skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 175171  
Title: Economy, Efficiency and Impartiality: Police Centralization in Nineteenth Century Tasmania
Journal: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology  Volume:31  Issue:3  Dated:December 1998  Pages:242 to 266
Author(s): S Petrow
Publication Date: 1998
Pages: 25
Origin: Australia
Language: English
Annotation: After examining the working of Tasmania's decentralized policing system from 1858 to 1898, this paper explains the introduction of police centralization in 1899 and examines its effects.
Abstract: In late 19th century Australia, Tasmania was the only colony with a decentralized policing system. Despite its uniqueness, few Australian scholars have analyzed how this policing system operated in practice or fully explained why centralization was introduced in 1899. After briefly examining the reasons why decentralization was introduced in 1858, this paper considers the numerous criticisms of the system. These included the failure of municipal police forces to enforce the laws impartially and uniformly, the lack of cooperation between forces; and, with each of the 21 forces being headed by a superintendent, the excessive cost of separate forces. A select committee of 1886 confirmed weaknesses in the system and thereafter successive ministries, seeking more efficient and rational government, campaigned for police centralization. Municipal opposition was only overcome when the Braddon government bribed the municipalities with substantial financial relief and persuaded them that municipal government would be strengthened by relinquishing the burden of controlling the police. 1 table, 17 notes, and 56 references
Main Term(s): Police organizational structure
Index Term(s): Efficiency ; Police management ; Organization development ; Foreign police ; History of policing
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=175171

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder