Bibliographic Citation
See/Add Document Discussions Return to Search Results Return to Original Search Page Download as EndNote
Full Text	0 K   View Full Text or Access Individual Pages  -   search, view and/or download individual pages
Title	Intercomparison and Evaluation of Cumulus Parameterizations under Summertime Midlatitude Continental Conditions
Creator/Author	Xie, S ; Cederwall, R T ; Yio, J ; Xu, K-M
Publication Date	2001 May 17
OSTI Identifier	OSTI ID: 15013152
Report Number(s)	UCRL-JC-142040-REV-1
DOE Contract Number	W-7405-ENG-48
Other Number(s)	TRN: US200604%%187
Resource Type	Conference
Resource Relation	Conference: 11th Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Science Team Meeting, Atlanta, GA, Mar 19 - Aug 23, 2001
Research Org	Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA
Sponsoring Org	USDOE
Subject	54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; CONVECTION; EVALUATION; GENERAL CIRCULATION MODELS; HEAT EXCHANGERS; HEATING; INSTABILITY; PERFORMANCE; RADIATIONS; SIMULATION; TROPOSPHERE
Description/Abstract	Parameterization of cumulus convection in general circulation model (GCM) has been recognized as one of the most important and complex issues in the model physical parameterizations. In earlier studies, most cumulus parameterizations were developed and evaluated using data observed over tropical oceans, such as the GATE (the Global Atmospheric Research Program's Atlantic Tropical Experiment) data. This is partly due to inadequate field measurements in the midlatitudes. In this study, we compare and evaluate a total of eight types of the state-of-the-art cumulus parameterizations used in fifteen Single-Column Models (SCM) under the summertime midlatitude continental conditions using the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP) summer 1997 Intensive Operational Period (IOP) data, which covers several continental convection events. The purpose is to systematically compare and evaluate the performance of these cumulus parameterizations under summertime midlatitude continental conditions. Through the study we hope to identify strengths and weaknesses of these cumulus parameterizations that will lead to further improvements. Here, we briefly present our most interesting results. A full description of this study can be seen in Xie et al. (2001). The authors conclude that: (1) The SCM simulation errors are closely related to problems with model cumulus parameterizations. The schemes with triggering based on CAPE generally produce more active cumulus convection than the schemes with triggering based on local parcel buoyancy over land surface at midlatitudes since CAPE is usually large and is mainly determined by the strong solar diurnal heating there. The use of positive CAPE to trigger model convection can lead to an overestimation of convection during the daytime. This results in warmer/drier atmospheres in the former and cooler/more moist atmospheres in the latter. (2) A non-penetrative convection scheme can underestimate the depth of conditional instability for deep midlatitude continental convection, and therefore results in a cooler atmosphere in the upper troposphere. (3) The updraft mass fluxes in the SCMs agree quantitatively well with those in the CRMs. In contrast, most SCMs produce very weak downdraft mass fluxes compared with those diagnosed from the CRMs. These discrepancies are primary attributable to the neglect of mesoscale circulations in the SCMs, uncertainties in the diagnosed mass fluxes from the CRMs, and deficiencies in the SCM parameterizations of mass fluxes.
Country of Publication	United States
Language	English
Format	Size: 16
System Entry Date	2007 Nov 30
Document Discussions Discuss	User Name:  (for display) Email Address:  (Email address will NOT be displayed.) Discussion Subject:    (All fields required. Document Discussions not displayed until approved.)
See/Add Document Discussions Return to Search Results Return to Original Search Page Download as EndNote
Top