Labs for the 21st Century logoLabs for the 21st Century  
Skip to main content Skip to main content
Skip to main content
 
Skip to main content

Design to Minimize Ownership Costs in an Energy Guzzling Large Animal Biocontainment Building

Kenneth Gow, Merrick and Company
  
Biocontainment laboratories are expensive to build and expensive to operate. The challenge of incorporating sustainability principles is to do so in a way that does not compromise the integrity of the biocontainment system that is essential in protecting occupant and environmental safety.

The USDA is currently building a BSL-3 Ag large animal housing facility as part of the modernization of the National Animal Disease Center in Ames, Iowa. The design of this building involved many challenges in providing for the needs of the research program in a structure that meets the exacting requirements laid down by the USDA for biocontainment integrity.

The containment design of the building was formidable in itself. The structure not only has to form a stable backing for the impervious containment barrier, it has to restrain and withstand severe impact loads from animals up to the size of bison. The electrical systems have to provide reliability and redundancy while withstanding the corrosive effects of decontamination. The mechanical systems provide high ventilation flows while HEPA filtering all supply and exhaust air.

To minimize the energy consumption and maintenance effort compounded the design effort. Heat recovery and flexible operating scenarios were incorporated. CFD analysis was used to maximize ventilation effectiveness and as much equipment as possible was located outside of the contained space.

Findings:

The operating costs of a BSL-3 Ag building are highly dependant on the ventilation rates. Ventilation rates are dictated by the requirements of AAALAC (Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care). Although AAALAC requirements allow a scientific approach to determining ventilation rates, compliance is most easily demonstrated by a proscriptive air change rate. Our CFD study showed that ventilation effectiveness is determined by room layout and air distribution location as much as by air quantities.

Other unusual aspects of the design process included the exceptionally close coordination required between different design disciplines. The rugged penning and gating required to restrain large animals such as bison, required substantial structural embedments in the poured in place concrete structure. These in turn interfered with electrical and plumbing services. Coordination required up to ten professionals working together to solve problems on a clash by clash basis. On top of this, the close relationship developed by the designers with the USDA scientific program staff, was essential to ensure that the scientific needs of the building were carried through into the design.

The USDA Ames modernization included additions and enhancements of the co-generation energy plant. This will serve the fully developed site with an energy efficient source of steam and chilled water. However, to reduce the energy demand of the all outside air system, run around coil heat exchangers were incorporated in the design.

Labs21 Connection:

The BSL-3 Large Animal Building at Ames is a state of the art facility designed to contain dangerous and exotic research pathogens. The buildings unique features both prevent accidental release and at the same time protect its occupants.

As the design developed, a "whole building" approach became essential as the interrelatedness of every building component became apparent. With the assistance of biocontainment experts, architects along with structural, electrical, agricultural and mechanical engineers worked together to integrate each component into the building.

Measures to reduce expected energy use included analysis of the fundamental ventilation requirements in the animal rooms and use of a run around energy recovery loop in the all outside air system.

A commissioning plan has been prepared as part of the design and detailed functional performance check lists will ensure that the system design intent is met.

Biography:

Ken Gow is a mechanical engineer with Merrick and Company of Denver. In his five years with Merrick, Ken has designed mechanical systems for laboratories built throughout the United States. He is presently working on the design of a number of biocontainment facilities.

Prior to joining Merrick, Ken gained many years of experience in Australia and South East Asia. His notable projects in Australia included mechanical designs of hospitals and laboratories. In Malaysia, he worked as a project engineer on the chiller plant and retail complex associated with the Petronas Towers.

Ken holds a bachelor of engineering degree from the University of Western Australia and a master of engineering management degree from Curtin University in Australia. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado and a member of the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers and the Institution of Engineers, Australia.

 

Back to the Agenda