skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 101785  
Title: Practical Issues in Eyewitness Research (From Impact of Social Psychology on Procedural Justice, P 109-134, 1986, Martin F Kaplan, ed. - See NCJ-101784)
Author(s): G L Wells ; E F Wright
Sale: Charles C Thomas
2600 South First Street
Springfield, IL 62794
United States
Publication Date: 1986
Pages: 26
Type: Studies/research reports
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This paper presents an overview of psychological research findings on eyewitness testimony and analyzes two current methods for applying this knowledge to improve the justice system.
Abstract: Research findings indicate that eyewitness memory is distorted through seemingly trivial variations in question wording, that the accuracy of eyewitness identifications is strongly related to the instructions and structure of lineups and picture arrays, and that eyewitness certainty has little relationship to eyewitness identification accuracy. Two general approaches for applying these findings to the justice system's improvement are expert testimony by psychologists and system intervention in the collection of eyewitness evidence. Both approaches have problems. Expert testimony has suffered in part from being descriptive rather than proscriptive. System intervention has suffered from the lack of incentive for police to improve their procedures. An integration of the expert testimony and system approaches can make expert testimony proscriptive and introduce incentives for police to improve their eyewitness evidence collection procedures. 63 references. (Author summary modifed)
Main Term(s): Eyewitness testimony
Index Term(s): Suspect identification ; Expert witnesses ; Line-up ; Mug shots ; Police policies and procedures
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=101785

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder