\\ Species Tag:        &   17003 & Name:&  CH3D          
\\ Version:            &       1 & & Mono-deutero
\\ Date:       & Nov. 2008       & & methane
\\ Contributor:&  B. J. Drouin  & &
\\             &  H. S. P. M\"uller & &
\\ Lines Listed:       &     143 & Q(300.0)=&      806.8991
\\ Freq. (GHz) $<$     &    4829 & Q(225.0)=&      524.5613
\\ Max. J:             &      20 & Q(150.0)=&      286.2703
\\ LOGSTR0=            &    -8.0 & Q(75.00)=&      102.1602
\\ LOGSTR1=            &    -9.0 & Q(37.50)=&       36.9308
\\ Isotope Corr.:      &-3.824   & Q(18.75)=&       14.0565
\\ Egy. (cm$^{-1}$) $>$&     0.0 & Q(9.375)=&        5.9592
\\ $\mu_a$ = &   0.0056          & A=& 157412.
\\ $\mu_b$ = &                   & B=&116325.
\\ $\mu_c$ = &                   & C=&B
\headend

The J" = 0, 1 transition frequencies were taken from
(1) M. Womack, A. J. Apponi, L. M. Ziurys, 1996, Astrophys. J., 461, 897.
The J" = 2 - 4 transition frequencies were reported by
(2) V. Lattanzi, A. Walters, J. C. Pearson, and B. J. Drouin, 2008, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 109, 897.
In addition, infrared ground state combination differences were used in the fit. These were published in
(3) C. Chackerian, Jr., and G. Guelachvili, 1980, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 84, 447;
(4) C. Chackerian, Jr., E. S. Bus, W. B. Olson, and G. Guelachvili, 1986, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 117, 255;
(5) O. N. Ulenikov, G. A. Onopenko, N. E. Tyabaeva, J. Schroderus, and S. Alanko, 1999, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 193, 249.
Some discrepencies have been observed among the data sets, notably between (3), (5), and the high J transitions of (2). We have doubled the uncertainties of (3) and (5), omitted the J" = 4, K = 0, 1, and 2 transition frequencies of (2) and raised the uncertainties of the two remaining J" = 4 lines to 150 kHz. For that matter, predictions beyond 1 THz should be viewed with some caution. Nevertheless, because of the extensive IR data used in the fits the predictions are though to be fairly reliable throughout.
The dipole moment and distortion corrections were taken from
(6) J. K. G. Watson, M. Takami, and T. Oka, 1979, J. Chem. Phys., 70, 5376.
As the distortion effects are rather large the intensities should be viewed with increasing caution beyond J of about 8.