The
Swearingens Become Prominent Under Lord Fairfax Rule
1745
After years of dispute,
the Fairfax Northern Neck Proprietary was defined and reaffirmed
by the Privy Council in England, confirming the “first
fountain” of the Cohongoroota as the head of the Potomac
River, and making Fairfax the owner of over 5 million acres of
Virginia! This essentially created two separate colonies within
Virginia, at least in terms of acquiring a land grant, with Fairfax
now in charge of all grants between the Rappahannock and Potomac
Rivers. A survey was ordered to mark the western boundary that
became known as the Fairfax Line, a boundary line running NW
from near the present-day Big Meadow area of Shenandoah National
Park to the head spring of the Potomac near present-day Davis,
West Virginia; the surveyors laid a stone monument at the head
spring, known as the Fairfax stone, and its various replacements
can still be seen today. The surveyors included Peter Jefferson
(father of the third president), and Robert Brooke (the son of
the surveyor for the 1734 Anderson, Mounts and Jones survey near
Terrapin Neck). This created a situation where the Hites and
Fairfax now “owned” some of the same land. The Hites
and Fairfax got in a squabble and Fairfax refused to honor Hite
titles despite what he agreed to in 1738 (Couper 1952). Hite
apparently had taken a long time to grudgingly provide to Fairfax
names of settlers on lands Hite had surveyed, along with a description
of the property boundaries. When he finally did provide them,
the records and property descriptions were terrible; Fairfax
felt disinclined to issue grants to what he considered fictitious
people living on property with uncertain boundaries, and also
wondered why the name “Hite” frequently appeared
in the ledger obviously replacing a number of other erased names.
Later court documents show that a high percentage of the acreage
did go to the Hite family, though this was by no means a transgression
of the terms of the 1730 grant purchased from the Van Meters.
Using the names and acreages listed on page 174 in McKay (1951),
Jost Hite’s name is the “assignee” associated
with 12 of 52 parcels surveyed and patented in 1734 under the
Van Meter grant, amounting to 18,869 acres, or 41% of the total
acreage of 46,248 acres. There were 36 other family names in
the list, and if legitimate, this was 6 more than was strictly
needed. The 100,000-acre grant that Hite held with several partners
was perhaps more of an issue, as it was found that only about
a third of the listed families were actually living on the property
in question.
Fairfax also objected to the Hite surveys for their tendency to lock up the
water resources of an area. Many of the property boundaries of the Hite-surveyed
lands included only the long, thin bottomlands bordering a stream, plus any
adjacent choice uplands including the nearby springs. This made it difficult
for later settlers to utilize adjacent property because of the lack of water.
For example, in the Shepherdstown area John Van Meter acquired a long, thin
parcel totaling 1,786 acres that included most of the narrow watershed of what
is now known as Rocky Marsh Run, while the original Poulson, Mounts and Jones
patent included extensive Potomac River frontage, the lower portion of Rocky
Marsh Run, and an irregular shape designed to acquire the several major springs
in the area. Richard Morgan acquired a skinny 290-acre patent between and perpendicular
to the two grants listed above which included a spring and a meadow that ran
into Rocky Marsh Run (now the site of The Conservation Fund’s Freshwater
Institute). Israel Friend’s 300-acre patent was a long, narrow bottomland
tract adjacent to the Potomac just downstream from Packhorse Ford on the Virginia
side and was cited repeatedly by Fairfax as an example of just what he was
complaining about. Fairfax preferred what he called a “regular survey” that
followed the Virginia Assembly order of Oct. 22, 1712 which required that surveyed
parcels should have a breadth of at least one-third of their length (Brown
1965).
Because his original legal land grant description referred to “all
that entire Tract, Territory, or porcon of Land situate, lying and beeing in
America,
and bounded by and within the heads of the Rivers of Rappahannock and Patawomecke...”,
Fairfax encouraged everyone to begin using the name “Potomac” for
the river north of Harpers Ferry, instead of the old name of Cohongoroota,
which was of Indian derivation from the sound of a honking goose. Lawyers could
potentially have created mischief for his newly-won Proprietary if the boundary
for his claim was known by Cohongoroota rather than Potomac, so the original
Indian name had to go.
Closer to home, Thomas Swearingen was appointed guardian of John and Sarah
Jones, orphans of the deceased mill owner Josiah Jones and their more recently
deceased mother (O’Dell 1995). Thomas and his family had apparently moved
to the Jones Mill property near Terrapin Neck shortly before this time; Thomas
Swearingen and his heirs would own and run the “Jones” mill near
present-day Scrabble for more than 70 years. The mill location was adjacent
to the Cohongoroota, which would allow barrels of flour and grain to be boated
downstream to markets when water levels were high enough. Mill operators in
that day kept a percentage of the grain brought to their mills as payment,
and then sold the accumulated grain or flour to generate a profit (Stanton
1993).
In 1745, Thomas Shepherd was appointed overseer of a local road, in place of
Van Swearingen (Fred. Cty Court Journal, No. 2, p.2, in Smyth 1909).
This year also marked the death of John Van Meter, who had
been living upstream of the Jones Mill near present-day
Rocky Marsh Run about 2 miles west of the
little community being developed by John’s daughter Elizabeth and her
husband Thomas Shepherd. John had spent the last years of his life raising
horses in what became known as the Van Meter Marsh patent. He had given away
in 1744 “all stalyons, geldings, mares and colts, running in the woods,
branded on the left shoulder with the letter M” to various family members.
Note: Joseph and Remembrance Williams are mentioned in several
deeds in the Frederick County Court House in Winchester on
land near Jones Mill and the
area that eventually becomes RiverView Farm within the Poulson, Mounts and
Jones grant about this time, not sure what their relationship is to the property.
Two adjacent parcels were described with them as owners?, but they seem not
to have taken possession of the properties; this is probably a case of double
titles for the same property, the confusion in part from the ongoing Hite-Fairfax
controversy.
1746
A death threw Peter
Beller’s title to the Springwood property into doubt. By
decree of the Frederick County court, May 1746, Peter Beller “recovered
from Jonathon Simmons/Seaman an infant heir-at-law to Jonathon
Seaman, late of Frederick County” the 317 acres Simmons
Sr had bought from Joseph Mounts - the Springwood tract (described
in Frederick County, VA Deed Book 4, p.121). Jonathon Simmons
Sr died before the real estate sale to Beller was recorded (it
was a long journey to the Frederick County Court House), automatically
giving the property to Simmons, Jr., who was still a youngster.
Beller filed suit in Chancery Court to recover the property,
the court acknowledged Beller’s ownership and “ordered” the
infant to honor the transaction when he was legally old enough
to do so - within six months of his 21st birthday (this took
place in 1762, after Beller sold the property to Van Swearingen,
as will be seen).
1747
Twelve years after
his first visit, Lord Fairfax came back to the Virginia colony
from Great Britain to defend and administer his Proprietary claims.
He had settled his affairs in the British Isles and planned to
live the rest of his life in the Virginia colony. A map of his
Proprietary was finally published this year.
1748
Thomas
Swearingen acquired a 222 acre parcel (purchased from Richard Poulson)
near the mill and the mouth of Rocky Marsh Run (Frederick County,
VA DB 1, p. 396). He may have taken over the operation of the old
Jones Mill there at this time, along with taking on the responsibilities
and care of the Jones orphans.
1749
Lord
Fairfax, now living in Virginia full time, set up a land office
near Winchester and began surveying and selling grants of land.
If a settler wanted title to unclaimed land between the Rappahannock
and Potomac Rivers, the only choice now was to deal with the Fairfax
land office. Fairfax employed a number of young men to survey portions
of his Proprietary, including George Washington. Fairfax was also
commissioned Justice of the Peace for all Northern Neck lands, and
served as local magistrate, county lieutenant, and vestryman of
the Anglican Church. “Lord Fairfax, Baron of Cameron in
that part of Great Britain called Scotland, Proprietor of the Northern
Neck of Virginia” was now established as the ruler of
over 5 million acres. The Fairfax land office generally just re-granted
land surveyed and sold by the Hites back to the Hites and their
purchasers, despite all the squabbles, though this did not stop
the antagonism between the two groups on the 27 contested parcels.
Unfortunately Fairfax could not just re-grant the land on Terrapin
Neck to the Hite purchaser (Browning), because Browning was dead
and buried on the Eastern Shore of Maryland, had never settled the
property, and had no heirs around claiming possession; the late
date of the survey and sale may have also been a factor. The Swearingens
and others in the vicinity of Terrapin Neck were among the first
to apply to Fairfax for grants of land they already occupied and
elsewhere.
The Hite family and their partners were likely a bitter, dejected
lot at this time, though in the back of their minds all those years
they must have considered the possibility that the Fairfax claim
would be legally recognized. Despite almost 20 years of work their
expected fortunes had not been realized and the courts offered their
only hope of reclaiming their perceived losses. Predictably, Joist
Hite and his partners filed their own lawsuit to test the validity
of the Fairfax claim and to regain 36,686 acres of land that they
had surveyed but hadn’t been able to patent because of Fairfax
suddenly showing up out of the blue waving a decree from the King
(including the 1200 acres on Terrapin Neck that had been surveyed
6 months past the deadline). The Hite land grants were in dire legal
straits, and the Hite family certainly didn’t want to lose
the bond money they would have to pay if their buyer’s titles
proved defective! The Hites were only one of about a dozen groups
of speculators who had been surveying and selling land in the Shenandoah
Valley prior to Fairfax gaining legal title, but the Hites were
the only land speculators who Fairfax could not seem to accommodate
to their satisfaction, which Fairfax blamed in part on the Hite’s
effrontery (Hyman 1996).
1750
Peter Beller moved
from his patented Springwood tract to a new 400 acre Fairfax
grant near present-day Baker Heights (O’Dell 1995). With
the 300+ patented acres on the Potomac and the new 400 acre grant,
this suggests that Beller was primarily interested in plantation
agriculture with shoemaking a sideline business benefiting friends
and neighbors. Thomas Swearingen received a Fairfax grant of
478 acres next to his brother Van’s patented tract near
present-day Shepherdstown; he had been living on the property
near his mill, but was making plans for a new house and perhaps
a ferry by this time, closer to Thomas Shepherd’s little
town.
Farmers in the middle colonies, seeing diminishing returns from their fields,
began using clover and grasses to help restore nitrogen to the soil about this
time, 100 years after farmers in England first began the practice. Within a
few years, wheat exports from these same middle colonies, including Maryland
and northern Virginia, would account for about 20% of all colonial exports
(Dufour 1994).
1752
On 14
January, Van Swearingen received a grant from Fairfax for 187 acres
near the entry to present-day Terrapin Neck Road, just south of
the Beller property (maps are from data provided by G. Geertsema).
The shape of the grant indicated he had an eye on the Beller property
to the north, because the two properties combined would create a
much more square shape than the original 1734 Poulson, Mounts and
Jones patent boundary, while the 187 acres alone would be small,
strangely shaped, and provide no significant source of water. He
also had surveyed an additional 321 river-front acres on the east
side of his patented land purchased in 1744 (now the Cress Creek
development), and waited for a grant to be issued. His family had
grown to 6 children by this time. The vestry of the Episcopal Church
of Frederick County may have had at least two tight-faced members
in their meetings this year, as it included among its membership
John Hite (son of Joist Hite), Lord Fairfax, and Thomas Swearingen
(Couper 1952).
1753
Van
Swearingen hired a survey for a 200 acre tract along the unpatented
northern boundary of Terrapin Neck, but waited over 6 years for
the official grant from Fairfax to be issued. In his petition, he
described what he thought was about 400 acres of waste land currently
not claimed by anyone. He couldn’t claim all of Terrapin Neck
since Jeremiah York already had a Fairfax grant for 323 acres out
on the eastern end of the Neck, Vachel Medcalfe claimed an additional
300 acres, and Abraham James claimed 196 acres at the base of the
Neck. Van and his neighbors almost certainly were aware of the Browning
purchase in 1736, and the fact that the 1736 survey was completed
past the deadline, but seemed willing to take a chance on Fairfax
grants since there had never been a Browning trying to occupy the
land. The surveyor for Fairfax was Thomas Rutherford, whose son
eventually married Van’s daughter Drucilla. Van Swearingen
may have been living on Peter Beller’s property (Springwood)
by this time, but hadn’t paid for it yet. His neighbor out
on the end of the Neck, Jeremiah York, sold his 323 acres for which
he had received a Fairfax grant two years before to a William Chapline
for 58 pounds - thus indicating that Chapline was not particularly
worried about the Hite/Browning claim at this point either (FCDB
3, p. 90).
1754
British
settlers and explorers heading west over the Appalachian mountains
ran into French settlers and explorers heading south and east, with
tensions rising over which European group would control the upper
Potomac area and the Ohio River Valley. Many of the Native American
groups living in what are now Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio
and New York had become familiar with the French traders and settlers
during the more than 100 years of French exploration of the area,
and therefore many of them were convinced to ally with the French
in their dispute with the British colonies. (Several years later
the British had their own Native allies for a short time, when the
Cherokee and other groups in the Carolinas decided to weigh in on
the side of the British. Later the Iroquois Confederacy sided with
the British to use the growing British power to retain control over
Native groups in the Ohio River valley. The various Indian groups
across the continent had old alliances and scores to settle dating
back decades or even hundreds of years, and it had long been common
practice for them to travel thousands of miles to trade or fight
with other Natives - their participation in the British-French squabble
over half a continent was a variation on a very familiar lifestyle
for many of them.) By 1754 the French and Indian War had begun in
earnest, the conflict – international in scope and also referred
to as the Seven Years War – sparked by a young George Washington
and a group of Virginians and Native Americans who together attacked
a small party of Frenchmen sent to parley with the British group,
killing and wounding (and eventually scalping) a number of them
in a treacherous, less-than-honorable fashion even after a cease-fire
had been in effect (who did what and when is still a matter of some
controversy). Virginia’s Governor Dinwiddie, who had picked
Washington to lead the expedition, was a major stockholder in a
business venture known as The Ohio Company, which hoped to realize
enormous profits by settling and trading in the upper Ohio River
country. (Note that this venture was located in what is now western
Pennsylvania, an area well north of the Potomac River which had
been clearly defined as the boundary of the Virginia colony –
a Virginia claim for this area took some real chutzpa). This gave
him a personal incentive to send an inexperienced, unmotivated,
poorly outfitted, unpopular, expensive military expedition to protect
the company’s trading posts near present-day Pittsburgh, led
by an enthusiastic 21-year-old surveyor intent on making a name
for himself (see Anderson, 2001). Settlements in the lower Shenandoah
Valley were attacked repeatedly by Indians over the next few years,
and the terrified settlers occasionally dropped everything they
were doing and banded together in panic-stricken caravans heading
back east over the Blue Ridge. Several families and forts in the
Martinsburg-Shepherdstown area were annihilated in raids; note that
the terror was not a vicarious experience the Terrapin Neck settlers
read about in the paper, but a horror that preyed on their imaginations
every time a noise was heard in the night over a several year period.
Peace would not come soon for the settlements further west; in fact,
intermittent fighting in the upper Potomac Highlands and further
west along the Ohio River would continue for more than 40 years.
Authorities in Virginia committed a portion of their military forces
to frontier forts to protect against war parties coming from the
north, but an even larger number of militia were kept near home
to protect the colony from a potential slave uprising. A fort was
built in Thomas Shepherd’s little town around this time to
protect the local settlers, and most of the men were required to
join the local militia. Shepherd had begun to lay out town lots
by this time and felt compelled to offer them on good terms to keep
people from running away from the strife-torn area (see Dandridge
1910). Interestingly, his wife Elizabeth’s name was included
on all the deeds over the years as co-owner and co-seller, indicating
she considered herself a partner in the land business, an interest
she may have picked up from her father John Van Meter. Thomas and
Elizabeth Shepherd this year also became the proud parents of a
fifth son, the eighth of their nine children; they named him Abraham.
Abraham will become a salient figure in the history of Terrapin
Neck.
In his capacity now as a Justice of Frederick County, Thomas Swearingen
took several depositions regarding the granting of land by the Fairfax
land office (McKay 1951).
1755
Title
problems continued to plague many settlers in the area. For example,
100 acres of Thomas Swearingen’s 222 acres near Scrabble were
bought and sold several times by other parties who had bought it
from Joseph Mounts, even though J. Poulson had sold all 222 acres
in 1748 to Swearingen (Frederick Cty VA DB 4, p. 190 and 193). It’s
unknown if Swearingen knew about this at the time. Thomas Swearingen
also received official sanction from the Virginia Council to operate
a Ferry “from the land of Thomas Swearingen in the county
of Frederick, over Potomack River, to the land opposite thereto
in the province of Maryland” just north of the land owned
and being developed by the Shepherds as a new town; this area also
became known as Swearingen’s Ferry at the time - distinguishing
this river crossing from Harper’s Ferry, which was down the
river a few miles. Thomas would be remembered ever after as “Thomas
of the Ferry”. The regulation of ferries in Virginia was controlled
at the Virginia Assembly, meaning Thomas had to get a bill passed
in the Virginia Assembly before ferry operations could begin. Ferries
in Maryland, on the other hand, were either sponsored by the county
(the ferryman was a salaried county employee), or unregulated private
enterprise until a ferry regulation law was passed in 1781, meaning
that Thomas Swearingen did not have to get a separate license from
the colonial authorities in Maryland. The growing little community
near Pack Horse Ford (i.e. the Shepherds) agreed to maintain a road
from the town to the ferry landing near the present-day Bellevue
property, while Marylanders built a road along the route through
present-day Boonsboro and Sharpsburg to the ferry landing on the
Maryland side of the Potomac. Thomas charged three pence per person,
and an additional three pence per horse. In his first year of operation
he ferried General Edward Braddock and part of his military force
across the river on their ill-fated expedition to fight the French
and Indians near the site of present-day Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Maryland Governor Horatio Sharpe, namesake of Sharpsburg, accompanied
the expedition, and later reported paying “to Thomas Swearingen
on Potomac for ferriage of General Braddock party and guard £8.2.0”
(Green and Hahn, Ferry Hill Plantation Journal). Thomas Swearingen
Jr. is mentioned as a Captain of a militia company at this time,
as was his father Thomas and later his uncle Van Swearingen (Chalkley,
v.2, p.503).
Thomas Swearingen’s ferry landing on the Virginia side of
the river presented no problem because it was located on his own
property. The ferry landing on the opposite side, though, was an
issue because the property was owned at first by his neighbors in
Virginia. Directly across the river from his Virginia property was
the black walnut tree dividing the property known as Pell Mell then
owned by the Shepherd family, from the property called Spurgin’s
Lot, owned by William Spurgin, part of a larger tract called Antietam
Bottom. Swearingen chose to land the ferry on the downstream side
of the black walnut on Spurgin’s property, which seems not
to have bothered Spurgin since he sold the 50 acre property to Swearingen
three years later (Fred. Cty Md DB F, p. 504). The Shepherds, on
the other hand, later seem to seriously question the location of
the landing, feeling that it was actually part of Pell Mell, and
that the Swearingens were using the wrong walnut tree as a boundary
marker. And so the controversy begins.
In January of 1755, Maryland’s Governor Sharpe traveled the
Potomac River in a small boat from upstream near present-day Cumberland
to tidewater at Georgetown, in order to assess what work needed
to be done to make the river more navigable for boats floating military
equipment and farm products. Baltimore merchants tended to balk
at any scheme to promote Potomac River commerce, preferring that
goods move through their own ports, so the lead for development
of the Potomac River was carried on by Virginia mercantile interests,
most notably a young George Washington who had been on his own inspection
tours of the Potomac in August of that year (Hahn 1984). The Swearingens
were likely using the Potomac to transport flour, tobacco, wheat
and various other goods to the growing markets downstream in Alexandria
and Georgetown. They were no doubt very familiar with the impassable
Great Falls and Little Falls and other navigation hazards on the
lower Potomac because they had grown up near the Fall Line, and
still had relatives living there. Their farm products were likely
offloaded above Great Falls and then loaded onto wagons for transport
to the developing shipping ports on the tidal section of the river.
1756
Van Swearingen purchased
from Peter Beller 317 acres of the original Poulson, Mounts and
Jones patent for 135 pounds (FCDB 4, p. 121). Now he officially
owned the Springwood tract, which was just north of the Fairfax
grant he had purchased several years before. Peter Beller may
have been trying to escape all the troubles with title on Terrapin
Neck - including waiting for the “infant” Simmons
to sign a release when he reached the age of majority, the dispute
between Hite and Fairfax on neighboring land, plus there were
a lot of slaves and slave owners moving into the neighborhood
which German Protestants generally objected to. Beller also gave
Van Swearingen power of attorney to deal with any problems arising
from this sale and young Simmons (FCDB 4, p.123). Apparently
none of these problems dissuaded his neighbor Van Swearingen,
who was a slave owner and may have been a distant relative of
Simmons (Van’s cousin and sister-in-law Elizabeth was married
to another Jonathon Simmons, who died in 1761 in Prince George’s
County, MD). The Swearingen family also had the experience of
the past two generations that settled frontier lands of Maryland;
they may have been more comfortable with the inevitable problems
in a new country. For example, Van’s uncle (and father-in-law)
had settled on a piece of property in Maryland about 5 miles
north of Terrapin Neck on St. James Run, built a house and other
improvements, and then discovered someone else (probably Lord
Baltimore’s 10,594 acre Conococheague Manor tract) had
a prior claim - he had to settle for negotiating a lifetime lease
for himself and his sons.
Note that some or all of the Springwood tract (now the eastern portion of NCTC)
had been farmed by Europeans for more than 25 years before Van Swearingen acquired
it officially, suggesting that reduced soil fertility may already have impacted
the types of farming activities taking place on the new Swearingen plantation.
1757
Thomas
Swearingen polled 270 votes to George Washington’s 40 votes
for a seat in the Virginia House of Burgesses. His successful election
meant that he, along with Hugh West, would represent Frederick County
in the House sessions of March 25, 1756, April 30, 1757, and March
30, 1758. His son, also named Thomas Swearingen, 22 years old and
married to Mary Morgan, built a stone house next to his father’s
mill just west of present-day NCTC, which is still a private residence
today. They had a son named Thomas (of course) that same year.
1758
In September
Van Swearingen purchased an adjacent 132 acres of the Poulson, Mounts
and Jones patent for 70 pounds “Pennsylvania money”
that eventually became RiverView Farm (Frederick Cty VA DB 5, p.
187) and is now the western portion of NCTC; the boundaries were
somewhat different than present. This was purchased from Joseph
Poulson; there is no evidence that this was later regranted by Fairfax,
but like the adjacent Springwood parcel a patent from the 1730s
already covered it. Van and his brother Thomas together now owned
several miles of contiguous waterfront on the Potomac adjacent to
Terrapin Neck. Thomas was likely the wealthier and more influential
of the two brothers by this time, having acquired over 1600 acres
of land on the Virginia side of the river alone, in addition to
his property in Maryland (where his ferry landed) and elsewhere.
He was the elected representative from Frederick County in the Virginia
House of Burgesses and a captain in the local militia. He also owned
a mill near Scrabble (Jones Mill), and owned the ferry business
across the Potomac River. His ferry alone had the potential to make
him a wealthy man. In Fry and Jefferson’s map of Virginia
for this time period, the Great Philadelphia Wagon Road is shown
crossing the Potomac at Swearingen’s Ferry. Horsemen, footmen,
wagons and settler families numbering in the tens of thousands formed
a steady procession south over this road at the time. Relatively
low land prices in the Carolinas attracted newly-arrived immigrants
as well as many settlers from the more northern colonies. It has
been described as the most heavily traveled road in all America
at the time, with perhaps more traffic than all the other main roads
together (Rouse 1995). Some of these settlers, of course, chose
to cross the Potomac further north at Watkins Ferry, established
by the Virginia House of Burgesses Oct 9, 1744 at the site of present-day
Williamsport, and they could cross at various fords when the water
was low enough, but the Swearingen ferry, no doubt, did a considerable
business. Harpers Ferry, a few river miles to the south, would be
established officially a few years later in 1761. Travelers in Virginia
at this time could generally beg or barter meals, lodging and other
needs, but if they wanted to cross the river without getting wet,
they generally had to pay cash. A busy ferry operator therefore
could expect to acquire bags of coin that other businesses and individuals
would, of course, covet.
Thomas Swearingen was later described by George Washington “as
a man of great weight with the meaner class of people, and supposed
by them to possess extensive knowledge” (noted in Swearingen
genealogical file, Belle Boyd House), though this may have been
political rhetoric and it should be remembered that George Washington
as a young man had also described the settlers of the Shenandoah
Valley as a “parcel of barbarians” (Brown 1965).
Lord Fairfax in a letter to Washington also expressed his less-than-enthusiastic
opinion of Thomas Swearingen’s handling of militia matters
during the French and Indian War by writing “[Swearingen]
has always done everything in his power to occasion confusion if
his advice was not taken in everything” (Brown 1965).
The Swearingen’s militia company at least had strict requirements
for attendance: “At a Court Martial held for Frederick
County on Fryday the 27th October 1758 Ordered that Joshua Hedges
of the Company commanded by Captain Thomas Swearingen be fined 10
shillings for absenting himself from One General Muster within a
twelve months this last past” (Hedges family genealogy
forum entry).
George Washington again ran for election for a seat in the Virginia
House of Burgesses--in absentia because of military duties during
the hostilities with the French (which he had helped instigate).
Necessarily this time he had the campaign handled by friends. He
defeated Thomas Swearingen by being much in the news with his military
exploits and was perhaps aided by providing about a quart and a
half of liquor per voter at the polls (Couper 1952). Locals Thomas
Shepherd and his son David preferred not to back their close neighbor
Thomas of the Ferry, and instead voted for Washington (Smyth 1909).
Washington would now represent the “parcel of barbarians”
at the Virginia Assembly. The war with the natives was still very
much a concern for residents of the Shenandoah Valley. George Washington
received a letter in July this year from Joist Hite’s son
John addressed to “Collo. George Wasenton: …Our
Inhabitants is all Fled...and we are Generally in Great Fair of
the Enemy upon us” (S. M. Hamilton [ed.] Letters to Washington,
in Jones et. al 1979).
1759
Van
Swearingen built a large, fine stone house on the Springwood tract,
which included a fireplace in every room (several with beautiful
surrounds) and such architectural details as marble hearthstones,
wood moldings and other fine details - by no means a small, rough
cabin like many of his neighbors lived in. The present house on
the site, the private residence of Mrs. Hendrix, includes several
later additions. Despite the French and Indian War, or perhaps because
of the war and the profits that could be made, the latter half of
the 1750s must have been flush times for the Swearingen clan, as
Van, Thomas Sr and Thomas Jr were all able to complete fairly large
new stone homes near the Potomac. Many British colonists in the
Tidewater country at the time avoided building brick or stone homes
because of a deep-rooted fear that they were unhealthy (Wiencek
1988, p.8), so the Swearingen’s choice of building materials
may have been noteworthy at the time, at least among the British
crowd. Their Dutch heritage and German neighbors, as well as the
assuredly unhealthy pyric habits of marauding natives during the
ongoing war, and limestone rock lying readily at hand in their fields
may have all been factors in their decision to use stone.
By this time tobacco had started to stagnate as the major cash crop
from Virginia as wheat and other cereal grains became increasingly
more attractive for export. Demand for wheat and flour in the West
Indies and southern Europe provided a ready market for American
grains despite the Corn Laws that disallowed importation of grains
into Great Britain. Virginia has been described as the premier exporter
of Indian corn by the third quarter of the eighteenth century. The
growing of grains rather than tobacco also had the effect of facilitating
the establishment of towns rather than plantations because of all
the services required to plant, harvest, mill, barrel, bake, and
transport the grains (Siener 1985). Tobacco is mentioned as late
as 1788 as a crop grown by the Swearingens, but records indicate
they were growing a significant amount of wheat and other grains
for market as well during this time period.
1760
So much
for the big new home on Thomas Swearingen’s ferry property.
June of 1760 marks the death of Van’s brother Thomas of the
Ferry, 52-year-old patriarch of a large family (his will was signed
4 April 1760, proved 3 June 1760, suggesting an illness [Fred. Cty
Courthouse, Winchester VA]). Thomas left behind a wife and 9 children,
five of them 15 years old or younger; their uncle Van likely helped
raise and support these children, including a boy who was later
known to some as Van Swearingen Junior, though he was actually Col.
Van Swearingen’s nephew. Lands near Scrabble were willed to
Thomas’ sons, mostly to Thomas, Jr. (a.k.a. Major Thomas Swearingen)
who continued to operate the mill with his brother Andrew. (Major
Thomas’s son Thomas (b. 1757), with his wife Margery, would
eventually lay out a town they named “Hardscrabble”
in the vicinity of the mill, which has been shortened to “Scrabble”
- they may have been trying to develop a town like their neighbors
the Shepherds). The ferry operation was left to son Benoni, along
with the plantation on the Maryland side of the river. The actual
operation of the ferry was undertaken by his brother Major Thomas
for some time, as Benoni was only 5 years old at the time of his
father’s death. (It’s unclear when Thomas actually became
a Major, perhaps not until the Revolutionary War, but it will be
used here to distinguish him from the other Thomas Swearingens around
at the time).
Col. Van Swearingen finally received two grants from Fairfax that
had been surveyed some years earlier, one of them the 321 acres
near his original home tract and his brother’s ferry (now
east of the Cress Creek golf course). The other was the 200-acre
tract next door on Terrapin Neck, which seemed a safe bet after
24 years of being unclaimed by the Brownings. Little did he know.
Van Swearingen’s neighbor and cousin William Chapline who
had bought the old York place out on the end of Terrapin Neck seven
years earlier, died this year as well. His estate, including the
neck of land where the Steamboat Run subdivision is today, was divided
among his several children, with son Benjamin inheriting the Terrapin
Neck property.
British military victories in Canada resulted in a change of colonial
administration of that huge area to the north, putting an end to
the formal military hostilities between the two European powers
in America for the time being. The French were no longer sending
large groups of soldiers and natives to attack the colonies in the
mid-Atlantic region, but nonetheless the western periphery of the
colonies remained a dangerous place to live for several generations
of settlers. Because of their military service, the Swearingens
would eventually be eligible for land grants in the territory west
of the Appalachian mountains in what became known as the state of
Kentucky. But the remoteness and continual danger from Indian attack,
as well as British treaties allowing the land to remain with the
Cherokees, kept Virginia’s surveying parties who were responsible
for recording the new military land grant boundaries from carrying
out their surveys in the Bluegrass region for more than a dozen
years. The French may have been forced to give up their claim to
the area, but the native inhabitants certainly had not and were
more than willing to continue using violent means to make their
point.
1761
Van
Swearingen was Deputy of the King (Sheriff) and Colonel of the county
militia, and seemed fairly well connected with policy makers in
the colony. For example this year he received a letter from a politically
active George Washington looking for support in his bid for a seat
in the House of Burgesses:
Mr.
Stogden’s
May 15, 1761
Dear Sir:
At the Cock fight on Saturday last I promis’d to be at a Wedding
at Mendenhall’s Mill yesterday, which together with an Affair
that I had to settle on Bullskin (that detain’d me a day longer
there than I expected) prevented my taking Shepherds Town and your
House in my way, I intend this day to pass along the North Mountain,
and to morrow attend a Meeting at McGills on the Cumberland Road
and from thence to Winchester in order to wait my doom on Monday.
I have made a just and proper use of the Inclos’d and as I
shall pretty near finish my Tour to day, I send to you, that you
may, if you think it expedient, communicate the contents to your
Neighbors and Friends, Col. Stephens proceedings is a matter of
the greatest amazement to me. I have come across sundry of his Letters
directed to the Freeholders wherein he informs them that he acquitted
himself of what was charged to him in the streets of Winchester
while you were present, and goes on to draw Comparisons to prove
his Innocence, which are by no means applicable unless he had continued
them. However, His conduct throughout the whole is very obvious
to all who will be convinced, but I find there are some that do
not choose to have their Eyes opened. I hope my Interest in your
Neighborhood still stands good, and as I have the greatest reason
to believe you can be no Friend to a Person of Colo. Stephens Principles;
I hope, and indeed make no doubt that you will contribute your aid
towards shutting him out of the Public trust he is seeking, could
Mercer’s Friends and mine be hurried in at the first of the
Poll it might be an advantage, but as Sheriff I know you cannot
appear in this, nor would I by any mean have you do any thing that
can give so designing a Man as Colo. Stephens the least trouble.
(Doherty 1972)
Note: Colo. Stephens was the founder of Martinsburg and served with
Washington during the French and Indian War and under Washington
as a General during the Revolutionary War. Washington eventually
dismissed him, partly for strategic mistakes on the battlefield,
and partly for being drunk and unable to control his men at a key
period in a battle. Stephen’s men defended him by claiming
he wasn’t any more drunk than an officer ought to be under
the circumstances. Stephens was very bitter and wrote disapprovingly
of the ungentlemanly language Washington used toward him in the
heat of the moment
Van has been called King Swearingen because of his position as a
King’s Deputy; he also held a position as a vestryman in the
politically-important Anglican Church.
Joist Hite died in 1761, his lawsuit against the Fairfax Proprietary
still unresolved. His heirs had no intention of letting the issue
go away quietly, though, since given the right circumstances there
was still the possibility that those old surveys could yield a small
fortune.
1762
On the 6th of
October, Van Swearingen purchased the 334-acre Springwood tract
again, this time from Jonathon Simmons, Jr. (Frederick County
VA DB 7, p.56). The former infant Jonathon Simmons would have
turned 21 this year, finally “of age” to legally
turn over his right to the property acquired after his father’s
death. Thomas Swearingen, Jr. bought a 100 acre property near
Scrabble again (his father had first bought it in 1748) because
of double titles from John and Mary Pearce (Frederick County
Deed Book 7, p. 257). This now consolidated several miles of
river frontage near Terrapin Neck between Van and his nephew
Thomas.
Thomas Shepherd, who had laid out town lots for sale more than
a decade before, incorporated Mecklenberg this year. He may
have chosen the name Mecklenburg
in honor of the new English Queen, Charlotte of Mecklenburg, who had recently
become the blushing bride of King George the 3rd; (the town Charlotte, Virginia
was incorporated the same day - Kenamond 1963). The new name may have also
been an effort on the part of the Shepherd’s to head off any tendency
for people to call the town Swearingen’s Ferry, since after all, this
was the Shepherd’s little town. The little community included both German
and English schools for the children (Dandridge 1910).
Apparently the money that could be made from a ferry across the river tempted
another man to give it a try. An Act of the Virginia Assembly granted Thomas
Shepherd the right to start a ferry service across the Potomac (Henings Statutes v8,
p.164). Shepherd apparently had avoided mentioning the proximity of the Swearingen
Ferry in his petition, perhaps trying to take advantage of the recent death
of “Thomas of the Ferry”, whose will had specified the ferry operation
was to go to his 5-year-old son Benoni. Unfortunately for Shepherd, his ferry
Act was repealed by the Assembly a year later “because the same
being at a very small distance from a ferry already established from the
land of
Thomas Swearingen over Potomac in Maryland”. Note that the Shepherds
owned the adjacent riverside property upstream and north of the Swearingen
Ferry landing in Maryland, known as Pell Mell, but did not yet officially own
land on the river in Virginia, so it is unknown where they tried to cross with
their rival ferry operation, since the Swearingens had pretty well locked up
the Virginia shoreline north of town and surely wouldn’t allow the Shepherds
to have access there. At any rate, Swearingen heirs would continue their lucrative
ferry monopoly for more than 60 years, though later legal battles with the
Shepherd clan forced an occasional pause. As will be seen later in this manuscript,
the debate between the Swearingens and Shepherds over a ferry carried on into
the next generation--with repercussions for Terrapin Neck.
1763
Perhaps
in an attempt to cover all contingencies, Thomas Swearingen Jr applied
for and received a 324-acre Fairfax grant for his lands around present-day
Scrabble. He now held title both via Fairfax and via the original
Hite survey and King’s patent for Poulson, Mounts and Jones.
He also owned an adjacent Fairfax grant of 155 acres from his father’s
will.
The King and his Privy Council in England, trying to avoid further
antagonism, and also to live up to promises made to the Natives
living in the Ohio River valley during the recent war, forbid the
American colonists to take possession of land west of the Alleghenies.
They also did not want to continue to pay for military expeditions
to rescue settlers and forts on the frontier. The colony of Virginia,
nevertheless, had designs on the region known as Kentucky for use
as payment to officers and soldiers for their service in the French
and Indian War, and many wealthy prominent Virginians, including
Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and James Madison were involved
in various Kentucky land speculations in hopes of getting rich by
selling tracts to settlers. Squatters and debtors fleeing their
creditors were already flocking to the area, and the treaty, so
galling to the land speculators whose success depended on a clear
title, actually freed the squatters from the confining rules of
the swarms of surveyors, land agents and other minor officials;
they could rely on the old adage that “possession is nine-tenths
of the law” and patiently wait for an opportunity to gain
a patent, siting prior occupancy. (Holton 1999)
In a widespread uprising throughout the upper Great Lakes and Ohio
River region, Native tribal warriors forced many of the new English
colonial soldiers to withdraw from the region, in a year of vicious
fighting referred to as Pontiac’s Rebellion; raids were conducted
as far east as Winchester, Virginia. Virginia’s frontier was
under attack again, and the authorities were particularly worried
about the natives and enslaved blacks joining forces against the
white colonists.
1764
Van Swearingen
bought lots 54 and 56 in Mecklenberg (Shepherdstown). He also
received a Fairfax grant for 234 acres along both sides of Back Creek,
west of present-day Hedgesville. He and 2nd wife Priscilla eventually sold
this to a Snodgrass in 1779, who opened the historic Snodgrass tavern on the
site, favored by George Washington and others (BCDB 5, p.345, deed describes
it as recorded in Book M, p. 314 in the Proprietor’s office as
well).
David Shepherd, son of the town founder, entered a lawsuit in a Maryland
court to establish once and for all the boundaries of a piece of property he had
inherited from his mother across the river from the town, which was adjacent
to and just upstream of the ferry landing in Maryland. This 162-acre property,
referred to as “Pell Mell” was initially surveyed for David’s
grandfather John Van Meter back in 1743, several years before he died. After
John’s death, title passed to his daughter Elizabeth, who in turn passed
it to her son David (Smyth 1909). The court appointed three neutral commissioners
to referee the property boundary dispute and take testimony from witnesses.
Unfortunately for David Shepherd, the original 1743 surveyors Joseph Chapline
(the founder of Sharpsburg ) and Jacob Van Meter remembered the location of
the black walnut tree dividing the properties in Maryland as being above the
present location of the Swearingen Ferry landing, meaning that the Swearingens
were not trespassing on Shepherd property. They furthermore stated that the
reason the walnut tree in question was not “bounded” or marked
at the time was because John Van Meter had instructed them not to mark it until
the adjacent Antietam Bottom survey lines were known. One can imagine handshakes
and smiles in the Swearingen camp, and gloom and deprecations in the Shepherd
homes. In trying to establish their own ferry at their town, it seems that
the Shepherds wanted to try to extend their property in Maryland down around
the river meander as far as possible in order to line up with land not already
owned by the Swearingens on the Virginia side, but the above ruling should
have stymied their efforts considerably. Nevertheless, a year later on August
8, 1765 David Shepherd and his friend Hugh Stephenson were recorded as giving
bond to the King for the faithful keeping of the Ferry from “the land
of Thomas Shepherd at Mecklenburg to the opposite shore in Maryland”,
in another attempt to acquire the rights to the ferry (Fred. Co. Va Order Book
10, p.460 in Smyth 1909). The details are unclear, but this business seems
to have been short-lived as well. Perhaps part of the problem was the Shepherds
did not actually own any waterfront property on the Virginia shore as yet,
but they were working on it. A glance at the legal description and map included
on the old Hite survey in Virginia from 1734 shows that the surveyor drew the
eastern boundary of the Shepherd patent several hundred feet back from the
river’s edge; this may have been a deliberate omission by Thomas
Shepherd at the time in order to avoid having to pay for steep and
rocky land. But by
the 1760s the bluff next to the river had become valuable enough to
the Shepherds to apply for a Fairfax grant, which was finally issued
in 1768.
1766
Another
loss in the Swearingen family - Van Swearingen’s first wife
Sarah died, 44 years old; their youngest children were teenagers
at the time. Her burial site is unknown but it could have been at
the new Springwood property, or perhaps near their old home (they
had lived there about 15 years) in the present-day Cress Creek subdivision
where a daughter also likely was buried. Van eventually (before
1779) remarried to a Priscilla Metcalf, who may have already had
a daughter named Peggy. (The Metcalf family also owned property
on Terrapin Neck; Priscilla must have been quite a bit younger than
Van, probably closer to the age of his children).
1768
In October
Col. Van Swearingen bought two separate tracts of 101 acres and
63 acres near North Mountain and present-day Hedgesville, now in
the western portion of Berkeley County (FCDB 13, p.1, 88) and over
12 miles west of Terrapin Neck. These parcels were both originally
Kings Patents, and were also near his Fairfax grants. This continued
a pattern seen in his land acquisition strategy near Terrapin Neck,
where he acquired land both by Fairfax grant, and within colonial
Virginia patents (Kings patents).
Thomas Shepherd received a small Fairfax grant for a narrow strip
of land bordering the Potomac, located just downstream of a ravine
through which Princess Street now leads from the town to the river.
The Shepherds now held title to shoreline property on both sides
of the river, like their neighbors to the north, the Swearingens.
Unfortunately Pell Mell in Maryland was located around the corner
several hundred meters upstream, and the property directly across
the river from their new grant, part of the Antietam Bottom survey
known as “Easy Lot”, was still owned by a Levi Mills;
no doubt the Shepherds were inquiring about purchasing this property,
since it would give them a straight route across the river. Fortunately,
and probably deliberately, their new narrow strip of a grant on
the Virginia shore contained a very good site for a ferry landing
at its northern tip (it is now the public boat launch at the end
of Princess Street); or at least it was their opinion that the landing
site was within the new Fairfax grant. Another family in the area
disagreed.
Home / Timeline
/ Maps |