Leahy, Specter Press DOJ, DHS
On Investigations
Into Rendition Of Canadian Citizen Maher Arar To Syria
…Ask For Status of Internal
Inquiries
And Claims IG Officials Are Being Stonewalled
WASHINGTON
(Wednesday, February 28) – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman
Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Ranking Member Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) sent
a letter Wednesday to the independent investigative arms of the
Departments of Homeland Security (DHS) and Justice (DOJ) seeking
information on inquiries into the 2002 rendition of Canadian citizen
Maher Arar.
Mr. Arar is the
Canadian citizen who was detained by federal agents in New York City
in 2002 on suspicion of ties to terrorism and deported to Syria,
where he was held for 10 months. Late last year, a Canadian
commission found no evidence to support that Mr. Arar had any
terrorist connection or posed any threat, but
the panel found that he
was tortured and held in abhorrent conditions in Syria. The
Canadian government has apologized to Mr. Arar for its part in this
incident and has
announced that Canada will
pay Mr. Arar almost $10
million in compensation.
Department of
Justice officials briefed Senators Leahy and Specter earlier this
month on the Arar case following a request by the Judiciary
Committee for more information about Mr. Arar’s rendition.
Following the briefing, Senator Leahy said the
Administration still had yet to adequately explain its decision to
send Mr. Arar to Syria.
Senators Leahy and
Specter also sent a letter last week requesting that the Government
Accountability Office conduct an inquiry to determine whether the
government provides individuals with effective means to challenge
their presence on terrorist watch lists. That letter followed the
revelation that Mr. Arar remains on a U.S. watch list despite the
Canadian government’s determination that he poses no threat.
The text of the
letters is below.
# #
# # #
February 28, 2007
The Honorable Richard L. Skinner
Inspector General
United States Department of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20528
Dear Inspector General Skinner:
We have long been concerned about the
case of Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen who, while returning home
from a vacation, was detained by federal agents at JFK Airport in
New York City in 2002 on suspicion of ties to terrorism and deported
to Syria, where he was held for 10 months. A Canadian commission
found that there was no evidence that Arar had any terrorist
connection or posed any threat, but that he was tortured and held in
abhorrent conditions in Syria.
The Canadian government has apologized
to Mr. Arar for its part in this debacle. The head of the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police resigned, and the country has agreed to pay
Mr. Arar almost $10 million in compensation. Our country,
meanwhile, has not apologized or admitted any wrongdoing.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman
John Conyers requested in December 2003 that your office investigate
the role of the Department in the Arar case. Your predecessor,
Clark Kent Ervin, wrote to Representative Conyers in July 2004
indicating that the office was investigating the matter but had
experienced delays and obstruction in obtaining relevant documents
and interviewing relevant officials.
We write to ask the status of your
investigation. Please tell us if the investigation has continued to
experience delay and obstruction and, if so, please describe any
such delay and obstruction. Please also tell us whether your
investigation is ongoing, when you expect to complete it, and
whether you believe that you will have received all the information
you need to investigate the matter completely.
We look forward to your reply and to
your investigation into this important matter.
Sincerely,
PATRICK
LEAHY ARLEN SPECTER
Chairman
Ranking Member
# #
# # #
February 28, 2007
The Honorable Glenn Fine
Inspector General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 4706
Washington, D.C. 20530
Dear Inspector General Fine:
We have long been concerned about the
case of Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen who, while returning home
from a vacation, was detained by federal agents at JFK Airport in
New York City in 2003 on suspicion of ties to terrorism and deported
to Syria, where he was held for 10 months. A Canadian commission
found that there was no evidence that Arar had any terrorist
connection or posed any threat, but that he was tortured and held in
abhorrent conditions in Syria.
The Canadian government has apologized
to Mr. Arar for its part in this debacle. The head of the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police resigned, and the country has agreed to pay
Mr. Arar almost $10 million in compensation. Our country,
meanwhile, has not apologized or admitted any wrongdoing.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman
John Conyers has said publicly that he requested in December 2003
that your office and that the Inspector General for the Department
of Homeland Security investigate the roles of the respective
Departments in the Arar case. The Inspector General for DHS has
conducted an investigation which apparently remains ongoing. I look
forward to the results of that investigation, but there is also more
need than ever for a comprehensive examination of the Justice
Department’s role in this disastrous incident.
For years, our questions about Mr.
Arar’s case went unanswered. Finally, earlier this month, the
Department of Justice provided us with a confidential briefing about
this case, focusing on the decision to send Mr. Arar to Syria and on
his continued presence on a terrorist watch list. We both said
publicly after the briefing that, despite being briefed for an hour
and forty minutes, we came out with as many questions as when we
went in.
In this light, we write to ask whether
you have conducted any inquiry into this matter and, if so, what you
have found. To the extent that you and other relevant offices at
the Department are not already doing so, we request that you examine
the Justice Department’s role in the decision to send Mr. Arar to
Syria in 2003. We are interested in how the decision was made,
whether there were errors in judgment or violations of law and if so
by whom, and what steps have been taken to redress any such errors
and violations and to avoid repeating them in the future.
We look forward to your investigation
and insights on this important matter.
Sincerely,
PATRICK
LEAHY ARLEN SPECTER
Chairman
Ranking Member
# #
# # #
February
21, 2007
The
Honorable David M. Walker
Comptroller General
United States Government Accountability Office
441 G Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20548
Dear
Comptroller General Walker:
We have
long been concerned about the Government’s terrorist watch lists.
While we must make every effort to ensure our security, these lists
have often appeared to be over-inclusive and limited in their
effectiveness. They have too often ensnared innocent people without
providing any easy way for those caught up in their web to seek
redress.
Late last
year, we learned that Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen who was sent by
the United States to Syria where a Canadian commission has concluded
he was tortured, is still on a United States terrorist watch list
even though an exhaustive Canadian inquiry concluded that he poses
no risk and has no ties to terrorism. This revelation contributed
to our continuing concern about the Government’s watch lists.
In this
light, we were interested to review your September 2006 report,
“Terrorist Watch List Screening: Efforts to Help Reduce Adverse
Effects on the Public.” This report documents frequent
misidentifications and mistaken listings on the Government’s
terrorist watch lists and examines the varied procedures for
individuals to seek redress, several of which the report found to be
deficient. The report did not make specific recommendations because
the agencies managing the watch lists asserted they were in the
process of improving their systems.
We
request that you perform a follow up inquiry to determine whether
the agencies responsible for the Government’s terrorist watch lists
have, in fact, taken effective steps to reduce misidentifications
and mistaken listings and to provide individuals with effective
means to challenge their presence on these lists.
We ask
that you look at the redress available both to people wrongly
targeted in the course of their travel as a result of mistakes
related to the lists, as well as any recourse available to people
like Mr. Arar who are purposely placed on watch lists, but for whom
significant additional scrutiny has been conducted which may support
a different conclusion.
We look
forward to your further research and insights on this important
issue.
Sincerely,
PATRICK
LEAHY ARLEN SPECTER
Chairman
Ranking Member
# # # # #