skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 088845  
Title: Forensic Serology (From Scientific and Expert Evidence - Second Edition, P 897-943, 1981, Edward J Imwinkelried, ed. - See NCJ-88831)
Author(s): B Wraxall
Sale: Practicing Law Institute
810 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
United States
Publication Date: 1981
Pages: 47
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: In forensic serology, the material used in the testing and the analyst's interpretive standards can affect test results and render them unreliable.
Abstract: Various factors may affect the outcome of the serological test. In absorption inhibition, one area of critical importance is the dilution of the antiserum prior to the test. The antiserum must be sufficiently strong (contain sufficient antibody) to cause obvious and unmistakable agglutination of red blood cells bearing its corresponding antigen. The available antisera are often below standard. Just as the material used can affect the test outcome, so may analyst error. The washing step in Rh absorption elution testing is particularly troublesome. Also, in many cases, the result of a serological test is a visual pattern the analyst must interpret. The interpretive process involves the analyst's comparison of the test result with exemplars of known blood types. It is important that controls be used in this process. The current state of the art does not permit the identification of a particular person as the source of a blood stain. Rather, the analyst needs a data base to evaluate the significance of a match in blood types. These data are required for properly evaluating the weight of the serological evidence. Key terms in forensic serology are presented and explained, and population data and 11 bibliographic entries are provided.
Index Term(s): Blood and body fluid analysis
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=88845

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder