WSRC-MS-2000-00916

 

Remote Equipment Development for the Plutonium
Ceramification Test Facility at LLNL

K. D. Peterson
Westinghouse Savannah River Company
Aiken, SC 29808

 

This document was prepared in conjunction with work accomplished under Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500 with the U.S. Department of Energy.

DISCLAIMER

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy.

Available for sale to the public, in paper, from:  U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161,  phone: (800) 553-6847,  fax: (703) 605-6900,  email:  orders@ntis.fedworld.gov   online ordering:  http://www.ntis.gov/support/ordering.htm

Available electronically at  http://www.osti.gov/bridge/

Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062,  phone: (865 ) 576-8401,  fax: (865) 576-5728,  email:  reports@adonis.osti.gov

Abstract

The Plutonium Immobilization Plant will immobilize legacy nuclear materials in a ceramic material in the form of "pucks" and prepare it for permanent disposal. The Plutonium Ceramification Test Facility is being built at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to demonstrate proof-of-process with plant prototypic equipment, and will include a puck handling system to reduce operator exposure to radiation, to enhance operator safety, and to increase system throughput. Equipment has been selected and designed to meet the system requirements. The puck handling system is a custom-designed electromechanical unit that is configured to provide the required work envelope while fitting within the spatial constraints imposed by the glove box. Its work envelope is large relative to the spatial constraints in order to maximize its potential utility for non-routine operations such as recovery operations and housekeeping. A custom gripper was also designed to work within the severe spatial constraints imposed by other process equipment. A puck weighing/measuring station and a vacuum tool were also developed to meet system requirements. The equipment has undergone initial independent testing and is being installed to test its operation as part of the overall system.

1. Introduction

A process is being developed for immobilization and ultimate disposal of legacy nuclear materials. The Plutonium Immobilization Project (PIP) is a joint venture between the Savannah River Site (SRS) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). A Plutonium Ceramification Test Facility (PUCTF) is being built at LLNL, while the actual Plutonium Immobilization Plant (also PIP) will be built at SRS. The materials are formed into ceramic-based pucks in what is called the First Stage Immobilization (FSI) process. The basic FSI process steps consist of grinding and blending the nuclear material with ceramic precursors and other modifiers to create a fine powder, conditioning the powder, pressing the powder into "green" pucks in a press, and then sintering the pucks in a furnace.

The FSI puck handling system will provide automatic conveyance of pucks through several process steps beginning with removing the green pucks from the forming press, loading and unloading the pucks into/from the sintering furnace, and finally loading the sintered pucks into transport cans for removal from the PUCTF glovebox. It will eliminate several potential operator hazards arising from operating machinery within the glovebox, reduce operator exposure to radiation, reduce the chance of damaging pucks during handling and increase the throughput of the system. Ancillary equipment is also being developed and integrated with the puck handling system to determine the mass and geometric properties of both the green and sintered pucks.

Although the PUCTF is intended to demonstrate equipment that is prototypical of plant systems, significant differences exist between the envisioned PIP and the LLNL PUCTF in several instances, including the puck handling systems. The differences arise from factors of scaling and economics. The combined development team recognizes this disparity, and although the PUCTF puck handling system will not be plant prototypic in overall form, it will, however, be useful in addressing several plant-relevant puck-handling issues. Thus, the PUCTF puck handling system will provide both short-term benefits for operation of the PUCTF itself at LLNL, and support an overall project goal of demonstrating plant prototypic equipment for the SRS facility.

2. Equipment Selection

Initial steps in developing the puck handling system were to establish the functional and performance requirements, and to define the interfaces with other PUCTF equipment. Design specifics were then determined based on this basis. Functional requirements include:

Press Unloading

Furnace Unloading

Performance requirements include:

The puck handling system will interface physically and by electrical signals with the puck press, the sintering furnace, and the puck weighing/measuring system. It will also interface by electrical signals with the overall PUCTF control system.

Equipment selection was performed in parallel with development of the press, furnace and glovebox geometry, as well as the ancillary equipment selection. Following preliminary determination of the glovebox envelope, press geometry and furnace geometry, several automation strategies were reviewed for suitability to the application. Several models of articulated multiaxis robots, cylindrical robots, SCARA-style robots and Cartesian robots were evaluated. The Cartesian style was chosen for several reasons:

Having established the system configuration, methods of actuation were then evaluated. They included servopneumatic, belt drive and screw drive. A major criteria in selecting the method of actuation was to maximize the actuator stroke relative to its overall length, since a large workspace is required within the confines of the glovebox. Servopneumatic actuator technology is relatively new, and initially seemed to be a desirable option; they are relatively cheap (provided a compressed air source is already available), fast, and have high payload capacity. Although they have an apparently long stroke for a given overall actuator length, it was found that physical constraints imposed by the servopneumatic control system under consideration negated that advantage. The stroke-to-overall length ratio is further lessened with the addition of the integral linear transducer module. Although an external linear transducer can be used, its implementation is mechanically complex and generally undesirable for a glovebox application. Additionally, the servopneumatic system degraded in resolution as the stroke length was increased, and the stroke lengths required for the PUCTF resulted in unacceptable resolution. Most of the advantages of a servopneumatic system are irrelevant to the PUCTF application, since the pucks constitute a relatively light payload, extremely rapid motion is not required, and they offer no advantage in stroke-to-overall-length ratio.

Commercial screw drive and belt drive systems were then evaluated. Although both are capable of providing satisfactory performance, screw drive systems can be configured with a reverse parallel drive, offering the best stroke-to-overall length ratio, and were selected for the puck handling system. Although screw drive systems are speed-constrained in long stroke applications, maximum speeds are within target parameters for the stroke lengths required by the PUCTF. Screw drive actuators are available in enclosed modules that, while not absolutely sealed, offer high resistance to particulate intrusion. This is an important feature, since screw drives cannot tolerate high levels of particulate contamination such as might occur in the ambient glovebox environment of the PUCTF, especially near the press. An additional step that can be taken to protect the screw is to purge the actuator interior, creating a slight pressure differential that resists the influx of particulates. Screw drives can be driven by stepper or servo motors, and both motor types can be configured to operate in dry, inert atmospheres. Motor selection was, therefore, determined by the dynamic requirements of the system. Brushless servomotors were selected to meet performance and environmental requirements.

3. Equipment Design

Puck Handling System

The puck handling system was custom designed so that it could reach its extreme target points (the puck press and the sintering furnace trays), possess a large work volume, and fit within the glove box envelope. Its first axis is a horizontal screw drive linear actuator, which is attached to the glove box ceiling. A rotary joint is mounted to the horizontal actuator slide. The vertical column, also a screw drive actuator, is attached at its top end to the rotary joint. The last axis is another horizontal screw drive actuator, mounted to the vertical actuator slide, which serves as the extension joint to reach into the puck press and sintering furnace tray stack. The end effector is mounted to the last axis.

Illustration 1. Furnace Glovebox Layout with 4-axis Puck Handling System.
(The single vertical column and attached components
are shown in both the press pickoff position and
the furnace tray dropoff position.)

The end effector consists of custom designed gripper fingers that mate with a commercial pneumatic gripper. The physical constraints within the sintering furnace tray assembly required a gripper design that fits within the vertical space between each tray and is capable of approaching and retreating from a puck from the side, rather than from overhead, yet also does not collide with the tray walls when fully opened. Additionally, the sintering process reduces puck diameter from 3.5" to approximately 2.7", so the gripper was designed to accommodate that range of diameters. The furnace trays are composed of a refractory material, and are moderately fragile. Since the vertical actuator drive is non-compliant, it is conceivable that damage to the furnace trays could be incurred by collisions while loading the pucks due to variations in tray height. These variations can be expected to occur as a result of thermal cycling of the trays, variations in dimensions of specific trays at tray changeout, and variations in tray assembly position due to backlash in the sintering furnace tray loading mechanism. To mitigate this, vertical compliance was built into the gripper wrist, allowing up to 1/2" vertical variation in tray position.

Illustration 2. Puck Handling System Being Installed in Furnace Glovebox

Cable management has proven a challenging aspect of implementing the puck handling system. Each actuator is driven by a servomotor that requires two standard cables to connect to the controller/amplifier located outside the glove box: one for power and one for signals. Additional cables are necessary for connecting limit switches. Pneumatic lines also must be routed through the axes to reach the end effector. These all combine to create an imposing assembly that must comply with the system’s range of motion. A satisfactory cable management design has been developed for the puck handler, but at significant effort. Commercial servomotors are now available with a built-in controller and amplifier. Utilization of these type units would greatly reduce cabling requirements: they typically share a single set of power and signal cables, and also localize the wiring of limit switches.

Puck Weighing/Measuring Station

Puck weight, thickness and diameter will be routinely measured in the PUCTF so that the measured parameters can be correlated to variations in other process parameters and to off-normal events. The puck will be weighed using a commercial balance with an RS-232 serial communications port for control and data collection. Non-contact methods were evaluated for puck measurement to minimize the possibility of damage to the relatively fragile green pucks. It was found that ultrasound sensors could not reliably yield sufficiently precise measurements to meet the performance specifications. Laser micrometers typically have resolutions much greater than that required for the PUCTF (on the order of 5-100 m m), and Class II (eyesafe) systems are available with adequate depths of field to accommodate the range of measurements that will be taken. These systems typically rely on a diffuse reflection of the laser from the object’s surface. A commercial unit was tested with both "green" (white) and sintered (gray) pucks, and it was found that the diffuse reflectivity of both puck forms is well within sensor requirements for reliable measurements.

Illustration 3. Puck Weighing/Measuring Station

An overhead laser micrometer is used to measure the puck's thickness, which is calculated as the difference of the sensor-to-balance platform distance and the sensor-to-puck distance. A set of opposed laser micrometers are used to measure its diameter, which is calculated as the overall laser sensor span less the two measured sensor-to-puck distances.

To guarantee that the puck's diameter, rather than a chord is being measured (due to variations in puck placement), the laser array is mounted to a linear actuator. Once a puck has been placed on the balance platform, the laser array scans across the middle section of the puck. The maximum calculated "chord" distance among the measurements taken by the opposed lasers constitutes the puck's diameter. This method also allows several thickness measurements to be taken across the puck's face if desired.

Illustration 4. Laser Micrometer-Based Measurement of Puck Diameter

Vacuum Tool

The last step in processing each puck is loading it into a transfer can. Since the gripper is designed to handle pucks from the side, rather than from the top, a vacuum tool was designed to enable the system to lower pucks down into transfer cans. At the top of the tool is a round chuck that is designed to mate with the gripper. Chamfers on the top and bottom of the chuck aid in vertical alignment during gripper engagement, and preclude vertical slippage subsequent to engagement. A bellows vacuum cup is fixed to the bottom of a tube extending from the chuck. A port on top of the chuck is connected to a vacuum supply via a coiled hose.

Illustration 5. Vacuum Tool and Stand

To transfer a puck from the weighing/measuring station, the puck handler first grasps the chuck and removes the tool from its stand. The vacuum cup is placed over the puck and vacuum is applied. The bellows on the vacuum cup provides a vertical tolerance in tool position that aids in avoiding collisions that could damage the puck. The tool/puck is then positioned over the transport can and lowered into it. The chuck itself does not enter the can cavity, since it is being grasped from the side by the gripper. To avoid collisions between the puck and can (or pucks previously placed in the can), the puck is held slightly above its target height, and vacuum is shut off. Leakage at the vacuum cup lip results in a gentle descent of the bellows until the puck rests on the substrate. The tool is then removed and returned to its stand.

4. Conclusions

The puck handling system has been installed, programmed and cold tested in the PUCTF furnace glove box with the interfacing systems in a static condition. It readily met the relevant process functional and performance requirements under those conditions. The ancillary equipment has also been cold tested, and likewise meets the relevant requirements under those conditions. Further cold testing will be performed to assure the puck handling system's robust performance and interaction with the press, furnace, puck weighing/measuring station and vacuum tool under actual operating conditions, and to verify that it and the ancillary equipment meet all requirements. Subsequent utilization of the puck handling system and its ancillary equipment in the operational PUCTF will yield the desired reductions in physical hazards, operator radiation exposure and potential puck damage, while facilitating increased system throughput, as well as provide valuable information for use in developing the full scale plant system.

Acknowledgments

This paper was prepared in connection with work performed under DOE Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500 with the U. S. Department of Energy. All of the PIP Puck Handling Team Members at both LLNL and SRS made significant contributions to the development of the FSI puck handling system.