skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 062034  
Title: NUNN BILL - AN UNNEEDED COMPROMISE OF JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE
Journal: JUDICATURE  Volume:61  Issue:10  Dated:(MAY 1978)  Pages:476, 478-481
Author(s): J C WALLACE
Corporate Author: American Judicature Soc
United States
Publication Date: 1978
Pages: 5
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE NUNN BILL, PROPOSED TO MAKE THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY MORE ACCOUNTABLE FOR ITS BEHAVIOR, IS QUESTIONED IN THIS CRITIQUE.
Abstract: THE NUNN BILL (S.1423) PROVIDES FOR INQUIRIES INTO COMPLAINTS ABOUT FEDERAL JUDGE CONDUCT AND PROPOSES THE CREATION OF A COMMISSION AND A COURT BASED ON WASHINGTON, D.C., TO HANDLE JUDICIAL CONDUCT MATTERS. FROM A POLICY STANDPOINT, THE BILL IS UNWISE AND UNNECESSARY SINCE IT FRONTALLY ATTACKS THE INDEPENDENCE OF FEDERAL JUDGES. THERE ARE FEW JUDGES WHOSE CONDUCT WARRANTS THEIR REMOVAL, AND THE CREATION OF A FULL-FLEDGED BUREAUCRACY CONSISTING OF A COMMISSION AND A COURT IS NOT VIABLE. INSTEAD, JUDICIAL COUNCILS OF APPROPRIATE CIRCUITS SHOULD BE COMPRISED OF BOTH DISTRICT AND CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES ON AN EQUITABLE BASIS TO HANDLE THE FEW CASES WHERE MISCONDUCT MERITS ATTENTION. THESE COUNCILS SHOULD TRANSMIT THEIR REPORTS TO THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES IF RARE CASES ARISE WHERE ALLEGED CONDUCT REPRESENTS LARGE-SCALE CORRUPTION. BENEFITS OF HANDLING JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING SYSTEM ARE FLEXIBILITY IN MEETING LOCAL NEEDS, THE OPTION OF INFORMAL RESOLUTION, AND A STRUCTURE TAILORED TO MEET PERCEIVED NEEDS WITH ONLY MINOR INTRUSIONS ON THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY. IMPEACHMENT IS THE EXCLUSIVE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANS OF REMOVING A FEDERAL JUDGE FROM OFFICE. THE NUNN BILL IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, EMBODIES ERRONEOUS PRINCIPLES, AND IS ADMINISTRATIVELY BURDENSOME. CASE LAW IS CITED. (DEP)
Index Term(s): Discipline ; Judges ; Federal courts ; Judicial conduct and ethics ; Judge censure and removal ; Legislation ; Critiques/
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=62034

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder