National Cancer Institute National Cancer Institute
U.S. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute
Send to Printer
Adult Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment (PDQ®)     
Last Modified: 01/09/2009
Health Professional Version
Aggressive, Stage I and Contiguous Stage II Adult Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Current Clinical Trials

Note: Some citations in the text of this section are followed by a level of evidence. The PDQ editorial boards use a formal ranking system to help the reader judge the strength of evidence linked to the reported results of a therapeutic strategy. (Refer to the PDQ summary on Levels of Evidence 1 for more information.)

Patients with stage I or contiguous stage II diffuse large B-cell lymphoma are candidates for combination chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy. Four prospective randomized trials have evaluated the comparison of CHOP (cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine + prednisone) or more intensive CHOP-based chemotherapy alone versus combined modality therapy with CHOP and involved-field radiation therapy (IF-XRT).[1-5]

With 7 years' median follow-up, 576 patients older than 60 years with early-stage disease received four cycles of CHOP with or without IF-XRT; there was no difference in 5-year event-free survival (EFS) (61% vs. 64%, P = .5) or overall survival (OS)(72% vs. 68%, P = .6).[1][Level of evidence: 1iiA] A randomized trial of 401 patients comparing eight cycles of CHOP to three cycles of CHOP with IF-XRT was initially reported as having an OS advantage for the combined modality arm at 5 years, [2] but a re-evaluation for OS at 9 years showed no difference in either arm of the study.[3][Level of evidence: 1iiA] A randomized study (ECOG-1484 2) of 210 patients who attained a radiologic complete remission after eight cycles of CHOP compared IF-XRT with no further therapy; there was no difference in OS at 10 years (68% vs. 65%, P = .24).[4][Level of evidence: 1iiA] A randomized trial of 631 patients younger than 60 years compared more intensive CHOP-based chemotherapy versus three cycles of CHOP with IF-XRT; with 4 years' median follow-up, the intensive chemotherapy was superior in 5-year EFS (82% vs. 74%, P > .001) and 5-year OS (90% vs. 81%, P = .001).[5][Level of evidence: 1iiA]

The confirmation of efficacy for rituximab in advanced-stage disease as evidenced in SWOG-0014 3, for example, has suggested the use of R-CHOP (rituximab + CHOP) with or without radiation therapy but only on the basis of historical comparison to prior studies.[6]

Standard treatment options:

  • Chemotherapy with or without IF-XRT
    • R-CHOP (four to eight cycles).
    • R-CHOP (three to eight cycles) plus IF-XRT.

There are no comparative studies to establish an optimal number of chemotherapy cycles for patients with early stage disease.

Treatment options under clinical evaluation:

  • R-ACVBP (rituximab + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide + vindesine + bleomycin + prednisone).[5].
Current Clinical Trials

Check for U.S. clinical trials from NCI's PDQ Cancer Clinical Trials Registry that are now accepting patients with aggressive, stage I adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma 4 and aggressive, contiguous stage II adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma 5. The list of clinical trials can be further narrowed by location, drug, intervention, and other criteria.

General information about clinical trials is also available from the NCI Web site 6.

References

  1. Bonnet C, Fillet G, Mounier N, et al.: CHOP alone compared with CHOP plus radiotherapy for localized aggressive lymphoma in elderly patients: a study by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. J Clin Oncol 25 (7): 787-92, 2007.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  2. Miller TP, Dahlberg S, Cassady JR, et al.: Chemotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for localized intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 339 (1): 21-6, 1998.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  3. Miller TP, Leblanc M, Spier C, et al.: CHOP alone compared to CHOP plus radiotherapy for early stage aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: update of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) randomized trial. [Abstract] Blood 98 (11): A-3024, 2001. 

  4. Horning SJ, Weller E, Kim K, et al.: Chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in limited-stage diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study 1484. J Clin Oncol 22 (15): 3032-8, 2004.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  5. Reyes F, Lepage E, Ganem G, et al.: ACVBP versus CHOP plus radiotherapy for localized aggressive lymphoma. N Engl J Med 352 (12): 1197-205, 2005.  [PUBMED Abstract]

  6. Miller TP, Unger JM, Spier C, et al.: Effect of adding rituximab to three cycles of CHOP plus involved-field radiotherapy for limited-stage aggressive diffuse B-cell lymphoma (SWOG-0014). [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-158, 2004. 



Glossary Terms

Level of evidence 1iiA
Randomized, controlled, nonblinded clinical trial with total mortality as an endpoint. See Levels of Evidence for Adult and Pediatric Cancer Treatment Studies (PDQ®) for more information.


Table of Links

1http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/levels-evidence-adult-treatment/HealthPr
ofessional
2http://www.cancer.gov/search/viewclinicaltrials.aspx?version= heal
thprofessional &cdrid=71510
3http://www.cancer.gov/search/viewclinicaltrials.aspx?version= heal
thprofessional &cdrid=67707
4http://www.cancer.gov/Search/ClinicalTrialsLink.aspx?diagnosis=42714&tt=1&a
mp;format=2&cn=1
5http://www.cancer.gov/Search/ClinicalTrialsLink.aspx?diagnosis=42721&tt=1&a
mp;format=2&cn=1
6http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials