pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of procbJournal HomepageAboutSubmitAlertsEditorial Board
Proc Biol Sci. 1998 October 22; 265(1409): 2009–2014.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0533.
PMCID: PMC1689479
Relatedness among honeybees (Apis mellifera) of a drone congregation
E. Baudry, M. Solignac, L. Garnery, M. Gries, J.-M. Cornuet, and N. Koeniger
Abstract
The honeybee (Apis mellifera) queen mates during nuptial flights, in the so-called drone congregation area where many males from surrounding colonies gather. Using 20 highly polymorphic microsatellite loci, we studied a sample of 142 drones captured in a congregation close to Oberursel (Germany). A parentage test based on lod score showed that this sample contained one group of four brothers, six groups of three brothers, 20 groups of two brothers and 80 singletons. These values are very close to a Poisson distribution. Therefore, colonies were apparently equally represented in the drone congregation, and calculations showed that the congregation comprised males that originated from about 240 different colonies. This figure is surprisingly high. Considering the density of colonies around the congregation area and the average flight range of males, it suggests that most colonies within the recruitment perimeter delegated drones to the congregation with an equal probability, resulting in an almost perfect panmixis. Consequently, the relatedness between a queen and her mates, and hence the inbreeding coefficient of the progeny, should be minimized. The relatedness among the drones mated to the same queen is also very low, maximizing the genetic diversity among the different patrilines of a colony.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (170K).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Adams, J; Rothman, ED; Kerr, WE; Paulino, ZL. Estimation of the number of sex alleles and queen matings from diploid male frequencies in a population of Apis mellifera. Genetics. 1977 Jul;86(3):583–596. [PubMed]
  • Blouin, MS; Parsons, M; Lacaille, V; Lotz, S. Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness. Mol Ecol. 1996 Jun;5(3):393–401. [PubMed]
  • Chakraborty, R; Jin, L. A unified approach to study hypervariable polymorphisms: statistical considerations of determining relatedness and population distances. EXS. 1993;67:153–175. [PubMed]
  • Estoup, A; Solignac, M; Harry, M; Cornuet, JM. Characterization of (GT)n and (CT)n microsatellites in two insect species: Apis mellifera and Bombus terrestris. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Mar 25;21(6):1427–1431. [PubMed]
  • Kocher, TD; Thomas, WK; Meyer, A; Edwards, SV; Pääbo, S; Villablanca, FX; Wilson, AC. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(16):6196–6200. [PubMed]
  • Mackensen, O. Viability and Sex Determination in the Honey Bee (Apis Mellifera L.). Genetics. 1951 Sep;36(5):500–509. [PubMed]
  • Morton, NE. LODs past and present. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):7–12. [PubMed]
  • Thompson, EA. The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann Hum Genet. 1975 Oct;39(2):173–188. [PubMed]