Human Factors Home

 

 

 Search the tools:   

 

 


Risk Assessment > Hazard and Operability Analysis (HAZOP)
ABRM Analytic Blunder Risk Model
AT (symbol) Risk
Barrier Analysis
Bow - Tie Analysis
Change Analysis
Continuous Safety Sampling Methodology (CSSM)
Cooperative Evaluation
Event Tree Analysis
Expert Judgments
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
Fault Tree Analysis
FaultrEASE
Function Flow Diagram
Hazard and Operability Analysis (HAZOP)
Human Reliability Event Tree Analysis
Interface Analysis
Job Hazard Analysis (JHA)
Logic Diagram
Management Oversight Risk Tree (MORT)
Markov Latent Effects Tool for Organizational and Operational Safety Assessment
Multiattribute Utility Theory
Multilinear Events Sequencing Technology (MES)
Pareto Chart
Preliminary Hazard Analysis
Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA)
Reduced Aircraft Separation Risk Analysis Model
Relex Human Factors Risk Analysis
Safety and Risk Evaluation using Bayesian Nets (SERENE)
Scenario Process Tool
Subjective Expected Utility (SEU)
Table Top Analysis
TapRooT®
Technique Of Operations Review (TOR)
Technique to Estimate Operator’s Errors (TESEO)
The "What If" Tool
Traffic Organization and Perturbation AnalyZer (TOPAZ)
WinNUPRA
Limit 3 tools for comparision
Hazard and Operability Analysis (HAZOP)
Description : The HAZOP technique was developed to identify operability problems during the design stage of a plant. It uses a structured, systematic brainstorming approach with an interdisciplinary team to identify problems resulting from deviations from the design intent. It uses a standard set of guide terms which are then linked in every possible way with a tailored set of process terms. The process terms are developed directly from the actual process or from the operations analysis. The two words together, for example “no” (a guideword) and “flow” (a process term) will describe a deviation. These are then evaluated to see if a meaningful hazard is indicated.
Advantages : 1) Identifies potential hazards and their effects at every stage of the project life cycle. 2) Highlights where effort can be most effectively applied to improve the system safety, reliability and availability. 3) HAZOP can evaluate both technical defects and human errors 4) Useful in evaluating complex systems where failures are relatively rare events
Disadvantages : 1) HAZOP is a qualitative method; it does not attempt to quantify hazards 2) Time consuming and requires specific expertise which may increase costs. 3) Does not identify multiple failures or account well for dependencies between failures
Contact :
Tool Type : Brainstorming
References : Neogy, P., Hanson, A. L., Davis, P. R., & Fenstermacher, T. E. Hazard and Barrier Analysis Guidance Document. Department of Energy, Office of Operating Experience Analysis and Feedback, Report No. EH-33 (1996). http://pie.che.ufl.edu/guides/hazop/
More Info: 
Journal : 16
Proceedings : 6 "Click to see information"
Reports : 1
Books : 10