pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of geneticsJournal URL: redirect3.cgi?&&auth=0JOt6Opl0dzEC4iOFawlApQeHQr2QB29iHhOC9QNN&reftype=publisher&artid=1202840&article-id=1202840&iid=121276&issue-id=121276&jid=301&journal-id=301&FROM=Article|Banner&TO=Publisher|Other|N%2FA&rendering-type=normal&&http://www.genetics.org/
Genetics. 1986 June; 113(2): 305–319.
PMCID: PMC1202840
Autosomal Modifiers of the Bobbed Phenotype Are a Major Component of the Rdna Magnification Paradox in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Craig H. Marcus, Anne E. Zitron, David A. Wright, and R. Scott Hawley
Departments of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
Received August 12, 1985; Accepted February 18, 1986.
Abstract
rDNA magnification in Drosophila melanogaster is defined experimentally as the ability of bb/Ybb- males to produce exceptional progeny that are wild type with respect to rDNA associated phenotypes. Here, we show that some of these bobbed-plus progeny result not from genetic reversion at the bb locus but rather from variants at two or more autosomal loci that ameliorate the bobbed phenotype of rDNA deficient males in Drosophila. In doing so we resolve several aspects of a long-standing paradox concerning the phenomenon of rDNA magnification. This problem arose from the use of two genetic assays, which were presumed to be identical, but paradoxically, produced conflicting data on both the kinetics of reversion and the stability of magnified bb+ chromosomes. We resolve this problem by demonstrating that in one assay bobbed-plus progeny arise primarily by genetic reversion at the bobbed locus, whereas in the other assay bobbed-plus progeny arise both by reversion and by an epistatic effect of autosomal modifiers on the bobbed phenotype. We further show that such modifiers can facilitate the appearance of phenotypically bobbed-plus progeny even under conditions where genetic reversion is blocked by magnification defective mutants. Finally, we present a speculative model relating the action of these modifiers to the large increases in rDNA content observed in males undergoing magnification.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (990K).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Boncinelli, E; Graziani, F; Polito, L; Malva, C; Ritossa, F. rDNA magnification at the bobbed locus of the Y chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Differ. 1972 Jun;1(2):133–142. [PubMed]
  • Hawley, RS; Marcus, CH; Cameron, ML; Schwartz, RL; Zitron, AE. Repair-defect mutations inhibit rDNA magnification in Drosophila and discriminate between meiotic and premeiotic magnification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(23):8095–8099. [PubMed]
  • Hawley, RS; Tartof, KD. The effect of mei-41 on rDNA redundancy in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1983 May;104(1):63–80. [PubMed]
  • Hawley, RS; Tartof, KD. A two-stage model for the control of rDNA magnification. Genetics. 1985 Apr;109(4):691–700. [PubMed]
  • Henderson, A; Ritossa, F. On the inheritance of rDNA of magnified bobbed loci in D. melanogaster. Genetics. 1970 Nov;66(3):463–473. [PubMed]
  • Locker, D. Instability at the bobbed locus following magnification in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet. 1976 Feb 2;143(3):261–268. [PubMed]
  • Malva, C; La Volpe, A; Gargiulo, G. Comparison between rDNA magnification and bb lethal mutation frequencies in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet. 1980;180(3):511–515. [PubMed]
  • Ritossa, F; Malva, C; Boncinelli, E; Graziani, F; Polito, L. The first steps of magnification of DNA complementary to ribosomal RNA in Drosophila malanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jul;68(7):1580–1584. [PubMed]
  • Polito, LC; Cavaliere, D; Zazo, A; Furia, M. A study of rDNA magnification phenomenon in a repair-recombination deficient mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1982 Sep;102(1):39–48. [PubMed]