BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration 2005 APR View/Print

OMB No. 2010-0032
Expiration Date 08/30/06

2005 Performance Track Annual Performance Report

BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration
A010028
Year 2 Annual Performance Report
Member Since 2001 (2nd Member Term)

SECTION A: GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION

A.1

Name of your facility:

BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration

A.2

Name of your parent company:

BAE SYSTEMS, INC.

A.3

Facility contact person for the Performance Track program:

Name:	Mr. Jeff Mathis
Title:	Manager of Environmental Affairs
Phone:	(603) 885-6037
Fax:	(603) 885-0462
Email:	jeffrey.d.mathis@baesystems.com

A.4

Facility location:

Street Address:	65 Spit Brook Road
Address Cont:	P.O. Box 868, MER12-1506
City:	Nashua
State:	NH
Zip Code:	03061
Mailing address (if different from above):
Mailing Address:
Address Cont:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
If your facility has multiple street addresses, please list any other addresses for its sites or buildings.
PLEASE NOTE THAT NAME OF THE PARENT COMPANY HAS BEEN CHANGED TO BAE SYSTEMS, INC. BAE Systems facilities include: H.W. Pope Technical Park Facility (PTP), 65 River Road, Hudson, NH 03051 (PTP includes Litchfield Property, Derry Road, Litchfield, NH, 03051); Merrimack Facility (MER), 130 and 144 DW Highway, No., Merrimack, NH, 03054 (MER includes the Milford Quarry, North River Road, Miliford, NH 03055 and Manchester 18, 1 Industrial Drive, Londonderry, NH, 03053); Canal Street Facility, 95 Canal Street, Nashua, NH, 03061; South Nashua - Headquarters, 65 Spit Brook Road, Nashua, NH, 03061.

A.5

Facility's website address (if any):

http://www.eis.na.baesystems.com/index.htm

A.6

Number of employees (full-time equivalents) who currently work in the facility:

More than 1,000

A.7

North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code(s) that is(are) used to classify business at the facility:

335999

A.8

In your application and, perhaps, in previous annual performance reports, you described what your facility does or makes. Have there been any (additional) changes to your facility's list of products and/or activities?

If yes, please list them here:

A.9

Have the environmental requirements applicable to your facility changed during this reporting period?

If yes, please describe these changes here:

Section B: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

B.1.a

When was an EMS assessment last conducted by an independent party at your facility?

2005

If an assessment was conducted during 2005, please provide the type (e.g., ISO 14001 certification), the scope, and the month(s) of each assessment.

Type Scope Dates

ISO 14001 Surveillance Audit

The audit included a detailed assessment of training, awareness and competence; and emergency preparedness and response. Also, the audit included a summary review of environmental management programs, communication, document control, EMS audits, nonconformance and corrective & preventative actions, and management review. The audit was performed by Elizabeth Hamblen, AWM Systems, Inc., Hixson, TN.
September 2005

ISO 14001 Surveillance Audit

The audit included a detailed assessment of environmental management programs and structure and responsiblity. Also, the audit included a summary review of communication, document control, EMS audits, nonconformance and corrective & preventative actions, and management review. The audit was performed by Elizabeth Hamblen, AWM Systems, Inc., Hixson, TN.
March 2005

B.1.b

When was an internal EMS assessment last conducted at your facility?

2005

If an assessment was conducted during 2005, please provide the scope and month(s) of each assessment.

Scope	Dates
Identify gaps and conformance deficiencies between the current EMS and the ISO 14001: 2004 standard. Audit performed by Mr. Hans-Peter Krahn, CoVeris, Inc., Portland, ME	October 2005
EMS audit for conformance with company procedures and training. Audit included area walkthroughs, assessment of local EMS-related procedures and employee interviews regarding their awareness of the EMS and their responsibilities. The audit was performed by Chris Ford, BAE Systems ISO 14001 Program Coordinator.	August 2005
EMS audit for conformance with company procedures and training. Audit included area walkthroughs, assessment of local EMS-related procedures and employee interviews regarding their awareness of the EMS and their responsibilities. The audit was performed by Chris Ford, BAE Systems ISO 14001 Program Coordinator.	July 2005

B.1.c

When was an internal or corporate compliance audit last conducted at your facility?

2005

If an audit was conducted during 2005, please provide the scope and the month(s) of each audit, and indicate who conducted the audit(s) (e.g., facility staff, corporate groups, third party). (Don't include audits, inspections, or site visits by regulatory or external organizations).

Scope Dates Who conducted the audit

Industrial discharge, NPDES, SPCC, and AST compliance audit that included a records review and site walkthrough of all facilities.
  October  2005 Cynthia Vodopivec, ERM, Inc., Hartford, CT and Anne Gagnon BAE Systems Environmental Program Manager

1. Hazardous waste audit for satellite, 90 day storage areas, training, manifests, records, and operator awareness.

2. Air Resources audit that included review of records and site walkthrough.

3. Groundwater & Wetlands audit that included site walkthrough and records review.
   December  2005 1. Sue Prior, Clean Harbors, Braintree, MA 2. Steve Piper, Michael J. Bradley & Associates, Manchester, NH 3. Richard Van Etten Haley and Aldrich Portland, ME

Solid waste transporter audit to ensure waste was delivered to the proper disposal facility. Audit included following solid waste transporter from facility to disposal site. Confirmed disposal site is approved by company.
  March  2005 Rich Palozollo BAE Systems Nashua, NH

SARA/TURA audit that included a records review and site walkthrough.
  September  2005 John Berry, Haley and Aldrich, Manchester, NH.

B.1.d

(Optional) If you would like to describe any other audits or inspections that were conducted at your facility, please do so here.

B.1.e

Briefly summarize corrective actions taken and other improvements made as a result of your EMS assessments and compliance audits.

Revised and improved inspection procedures to more accurately reflect EMS requirements and activities. Developed uniform system for performing and documenting programatic inspections. Improved containment systems and eliminated potential source of release to the environment. Reinforced employee awareness of training obligations and emergency procedures.

B.1.f

Has your facility corrected all instances of potential non-compliance and EMS non-conformance identified during your audits and other assessments?

If no, please explain your plans to correct these instances.

A minor non-conformance was identified during a 3rd party surveillance audit related to documentation of training. BAE Systems' continuing corrective action is to provide outreach training and support to the appropriate personnel. The auditor is satisfied with progress made to date on this finding.

B.1.g

When was the last Senior Management review of your EMS completed?

February 05

Who was the senior manager present at the review?

Name: Mr. Jack Dearborn

Title: Vice President of Performance Excellence

B.2.a

ISO 14001 Certification. Is your facility currently certified to ISO 14001?

Yes

B.2.b

Is your facility a Responsible Care-certified facility?

B.3 Environmental Aspects Identification. When did your facility last conduct a systematic identification and/or review of your environmental aspects?

March 05

SECTION C: ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS

C.1 COMMITMENT 1

BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration's first commitment is to reduce the facility's total (non-transportation) energy use.

C.1.a Briefly describe your activities and achievements related to this commitment or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress this year.

BAE Systems did not make overall progress in achieving this goal in 2005. Contributing factors to reduce electrical power consumption include implementation of energy efficiency projects (e.g., light fixture and motor replacements to save energy). Examples of these activities included replacement of over 966 T12 lights with T8 light fixtures, replacement of 42 mercury vapor with T5 light fixtures, replacement of 5 motors with variable speed drives, and replacement of 3 compressor packages with more energy efficient units (i.e., energy efficient compressor and variable speed drive motors). Other activities and potential opportunities for future reductions are identified through energy conservation audits.

*Note: Electricity numbers for 2003 and 2004 were changed due to the wrong units used in previous years. Natural gas for 2004 was changed for the same reason.

*Note: The normalizing factor for 2004 was changed from 1.15. to 1.12 due to a calculation error.

Activities Conducted During 2004:
IEWS attempted to achieve this goal through implementation of energy efficiency projects (i.e., light fixture replacement). Examples of these activities included replacement of over 450 light fixtures (upgrade from T12 to T8 lighting), replacement of 68 tons of heat pumps with high efficiency units, and replacement of 6 motors with variable speed drives, and installation of 4 premium efficiency motors. Our activities and potential opportunities for future reductions are identified through energy conservation auditing.

C.1.b Please report your facility's actual performance.

Energy Generated Off-Site

Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Units

Calendar Year 2003 2004 2005 2006

Electricity Purchased

Electricity from Grid/Utility 69,500 73,000 75,100 Mwh

Specify:

Electricity from Off-Grid Renewable Sources

Specify:

Total Electricity Purchased 237,134.00 249,076.00 256,241.20 MMBtus

If your facility purchases electricity from the grid, please confirm that the electricity geographic region shown below is correct. If incorrect, please contact the Performance Track Information Center.
NPCC New England

Steam

EPA will be determining the greenhouse gases associated with the generation of the steam that you purchase. We will be contacting you for additional information regarding the source of the steam generated.

Specify:

Total Energy Generated Off-Site 237,134.00 249,076.00 256,241.20 MMBtus

Sources of Energy Generated On-Site

Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Units

Calendar Year 2003 2004 2005 2006

Coal

Specify:

Natural Gas 6,826 28,000 64,700 MMBtus

Specify:

Crude Oil

Specify:

Fuel Oil 120,154 114,800 96,900 MMBtus

Specify:

Diesel 1,092 1,300 6,500 MMBtus

Specify:

Propane/LPG

Specify:

Gasoline

Specify:

Hydrogen Powered Fuel Cells

Specify:

Natural Gas/Methane Powered Fuel Cells

Specify:

Biomass

Specify:

Solar

Specify:

Wind

Specify:

Landfill Gas

Specify:

Geothermal

Specify:

Hydroelectric

Specify:

Tire Derived Fuel

Specify:

Other Fuel or Source
Specify:

Specify:

Total Energy Generated On-Site 128,072.00 144,100.00 168,100.00 MMBtus

C.1.c Total energy use and associated greenhouse gas emissions.

Actual Energy Use Total Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Perform.
Goal Units

Total Renewable Energy Use 35,736.09 37,535.75 38,615.55 n/a MMBtus

Total Non-Renewable Energy Use 329,469.91 355,640.25 385,725.65 n/a MMBtus

Total Energy Use 365,206.00 393,176.00 424,341.20 n/a MMBtus

Metric Tons of CO₂ Equivalents 37,760.17 39,917.00 41,735.78 n/a MTCO2E

Metric Tons of CO₂ Equivalents Offset due to Investments in Green Energy, e.g. green tags 0.0 0.0 MTCO2E

Net Metric Tons of CO₂ Equivalents 37,760.17 39,917.00 41,735.78 n/a MTCO2E

Normalized Energy Use Total Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Perform.
Goal Units

Normalizing Factor 1.0 1.12 1.13

Total Energy Use 365,206.00 351,050.00 375,523.19 351,216.80 MMBtus

Specify other:

Net Metric Tons of CO₂ Equivalents 37,760.17 35,640.18 36,934.32 36,091.47 MTCO2E

Specify other:

Basis for your Normalizing Factor:

C.1.d Please list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are reporting these data.

C.2 COMMITMENT 2

BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration's second commitment is to reduce the generation of, and improve the management of, the facility's hazardous waste.

C.2.a Briefly describe your activities and achievements related to this commitment or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress this year.

BAE Systems implemented multiple pollution prevention efforts related to management of discarded metals and universal wastes (e.g., lead and precious metals) and selection of equipment to reduce/eliminate the generation of hazardous wastes. Waste management reduction efforts included elimination of an alcohol waste stream through product recycling.

*Note: The normalizing factor for 2004 was changed from 1.15. to 1.12 due to a calculation error.

Activities Conducted During 2004:
IEWS continued implemention of multiple pollution prevention efforts related to recycling of metals (e.g., lead, silver) and selection of equipment to reduce/eliminate the generation of hazardous waste. Waste management methods are not specifically tracked, but were assessment based on waste characteristics.

C.2.b Please report your facility's actual performance.

Performance Data

Waste Management Method Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Units

2003 2004 2005 2006

Incineration

Specify other: Combined disposal of incineration and landfill.
52.4 60.3 51.5 Tons

Specify other:

Reused/recycled off-site

Specify other:
0 0 0.0 Tons

Specify other:

Landfill

Specify other:
18.7 5.3 15.5 Tons

Specify other:

Other management

Specify other: Wastewater treatment
0 3.8 3.5 Tons

Specify other:

Specify other: Wastewater treatment

Specify other:

C.2.c Summarized progress toward goal.

Actual Total Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Perform.
Goal Units

Total Hazardous Waste 71.10 69.40 70.50 68.90 Tons

Specify other:

Normalized Total Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Perform.
Goal Units

Normalizing Factor 1.0 1.12 1.13

Total Hazardous Waste 71.10 61.96 62.39 n/a Tons

Specify other:

Basis for your Normalizing Factor:
Hazardous waste disposal quantities will be normalized based on annual sales for the Performance Track member facilities from Business Area information. Actual 2003 annual sales were $1,140 Million. Future sales will be adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

C.2.d Please list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are reporting these data.

C.3 COMMITMENT 3

BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration's third commitment is to reduce the generation of, and improve the management of, the facility's non-hazardous waste.

C.3.a Briefly describe your activities and achievements related to this commitment or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress this year.

Ongoing recycling efforts were used to control the generation of solid waste at BAE Systems. This recycling included precious metals, paper, cans, scrap metal, and soil. Recycling activities are promoted through the strategic location of containers to collect batteries and paper. Also, outreach communications to encourage recycling and postings regarding our recycling activities are performed.

*Note: The normalizing factor for 2004 was changed from 1.15. to 1.12 due to a calculation error.

Activities Conducted During 2004:
Continued recycling efforts were used to control the generation of solid waste at IEWS. This recycling included precious metals, paper, cans, scrap metal, and soil. Recycling activities are promoted through the strategic location of containers to collect batteries and paper. Also, outreach communications to encourage recycling and postings regarding our recycling activities are performed.

C.3.b Please report your facility's actual performance.

Performance Data

Waste Management Method Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Units

2003 2004 2005 2006

Landfill

Specify other:
1,217 313 104 Tons

Specify other:

Incineration

Specify other:
1,190 944 756 Tons

Specify other:

Reused/recycled off-site

Specify other:
3,289 1,033 833 Tons

Specify other:

Specify other:

Specify other:

Specify other:

Specify other:

C.3.c Summarized progress toward goal.

Actual Total Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Perform.
Goal Units

Total Non Hazardous Waste 5,696.00 2,290.00 1,693.00 5,362.00 Tons

Specify other:

Normalized Total Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Perform.
Goal Units

Normalizing Factor 1.0 1.12 1.13

Total Non Hazardous Waste 5,696.00 2,044.64 1,498.23 n/a Tons

Specify other:

Basis for your Normalizing Factor:
Solid waste disposal quantities will be normalized based on annual sales for the Performance Track member facilities from Businee Area information. Actual 2003 annual sales were $1,140 Million. Future sales will be adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

C.3.d Please list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are reporting these data.

C.4 COMMITMENT 4

BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration's fourth commitment is to reduce the facility's total water use.

C.4.a Briefly describe your activities and achievements related to this commitment or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress this year.

Water usage reduction activites were completed in 2004 at the NCA facility and the anticipated reductions were achieved.
*Note: The normalizing factor for 2004 was changed from 1.15. to 1.12 due to a calculation error.

Activities Conducted During 2004:
Water usage reduction activites used to achieve the proposed goal includes replacement of once-through cooling systems at our Canal Street location. This project was completed in 2004 and IEWS is already accumulating the benefits of this project.

C.4.b Please report your facility's actual performance.

Performance Data

Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Perform.

Calendar Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 Goal Units

Actual Quantity (per year) 62,800,000 58,500,000 48,582,000 Gallons

Specify other:

C.4.c Normalized progress toward goal.

Normalized Total Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Perform.
Goal Units

Normalizing Factor 1.0 1.12 1.13

Normalized Quantity 62,800,000 52,232,142.86 42,992,920.35 54,300,000 Gallons

Specify other:

Basis for your Normalizing Factor:
Water usage (in gallons) will be normalized based on annual sales for the performance Track member facilities from Business Area information. Future sales will be adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

C.4.d Please list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are reporting these data.

Progress Towards Other Significant Aspects of your EMS

In the table below, please provide a narrative summary of progress made toward EMS objectives and targets other than those reported as Environmental Performance Commitments. You may limit the summary to environmental aspects that are significant and towards which progress has been made during the reporting year.

Do you have additional environmental aspects to report? No

Attachments (if applicable) :

SECTION D: PUBLIC OUTREACH AND PERFORMANCE REPORTING

D.1 Please briefly describe the activities that your facility conducted during the year to interact with the community on environmental issues and to report publicly on environmental performance.

BAE Systems posts the Performance Track program annual reports on our external web site. Each facility performs an annual evaluation drill which involves the local fire departments. BAE Systems personnel are active in Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs) and with the New Hampshire Business and Industry Association (NHBIA).

D.2 Please indicate which of the following methods your facility plans to use to make its Performance Track Annual Performance Report available to the public. Please check all that apply.

Web Site
URL: http://www.eis.na.baesystems.com/about/links.htm

Attachments (if applicable):

OMB No. 2010-0032
SECTION E: SELF-CERTIFICATION OF CONTINUED PROGRAM PARTICIPATION FOR ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is not yet in a position to accept electronic signatures and therefore requests a faxed, signed copy of the Section E page. Please complete Section E online, then print Section E using the link on the Overview page. Section E should be signed by the senior manager of your facility and faxed it to the Performance Track Information Center at (617) 354-0463.
On behalf of BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration, I certify that: I have read and agree to the terms and conditions as specified in the National Enviromental Performance Track Program Guide. This facility, to the best of my knowledge, continues to meet all program criteria; I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this Annual Performance Report. The information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and based on reasonable inquiry, true, accurate, and complete; My facility has an environmental management system (EMS), as defined in the Performance Track EMS criteria, including systems to maintain compliance with all applicable federal, state, tribal, and local environmental requirements, in place at the facility, and the EMS will be maintained for the duration of the facility's participation in the program; My facility has conducted an objective assessment of its compliance with all applicable federal, state, tribal, and local environmental requirements; and the facility has corrected all identified instances of potential or actual noncompliance; and Based on the foregoing compliance assessments and subsequent corrective actions (if any were necessary), my facility is, to the best of my knowledge and based on reasonable inquiry, currently in compliance with applicable federal, state, tribal, and local environmental requirements. I agree that EPA's decision whether to accept participants into or remove them from the National Environment Performance Track is wholly discretionary, and I waive any right that may exist under any law to challenge EPA's acceptance or removal decision. I am the senior manager with responsibility for the facility and am fully authorized to execute this statement on behalf of the corporation or other legal entity whose facility is part of the National Environmental Performance Track program.
Signature/Date:	______________________________________________________
Name:	Mr. William T. Perry
Title:	Director of Facilities/ESH
Phone Number:	603-885-2184
E-Mail Address:	william.t.perry@baesystems.com
Facility Name:	BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration
Facility Street Address:	65 Spit Brook Road P.O. Box 868, MER12-1506 Nashua, NH 03061
Mailing Address:	,
Performance Track ID#:	A010028

B.3	Environmental Aspects Identification. When did your facility last conduct a systematic identification and/or review of your environmental aspects?
	March 05

BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration's first commitment is to reduce the facility's total (non-transportation) energy use.
C.1.a	Briefly describe your activities and achievements related to this commitment or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress this year.
	BAE Systems did not make overall progress in achieving this goal in 2005. Contributing factors to reduce electrical power consumption include implementation of energy efficiency projects (e.g., light fixture and motor replacements to save energy). Examples of these activities included replacement of over 966 T12 lights with T8 light fixtures, replacement of 42 mercury vapor with T5 light fixtures, replacement of 5 motors with variable speed drives, and replacement of 3 compressor packages with more energy efficient units (i.e., energy efficient compressor and variable speed drive motors). Other activities and potential opportunities for future reductions are identified through energy conservation audits. Note: Electricity numbers for 2003 and 2004 were changed due to the wrong units used in previous years. Natural gas for 2004 was changed for the same reason. Note: The normalizing factor for 2004 was changed from 1.15. to 1.12 due to a calculation error.
	Activities Conducted During 2004:	IEWS attempted to achieve this goal through implementation of energy efficiency projects (i.e., light fixture replacement). Examples of these activities included replacement of over 450 light fixtures (upgrade from T12 to T8 lighting), replacement of 68 tons of heat pumps with high efficiency units, and replacement of 6 motors with variable speed drives, and installation of 4 premium efficiency motors. Our activities and potential opportunities for future reductions are identified through energy conservation auditing.
C.1.b	Please report your facility's actual performance.

Energy Generated Off-Site
	Baseline	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Units
Calendar Year	2003	2004	2005	2006	Units
Electricity Purchased
Electricity from Grid/Utility	69,500	73,000	75,100		Mwh Specify:
Electricity from Off-Grid Renewable Sources					Specify:
Total Electricity Purchased	237,134.00	249,076.00	256,241.20		MMBtus
	If your facility purchases electricity from the grid, please confirm that the electricity geographic region shown below is correct. If incorrect, please contact the Performance Track Information Center. NPCC New England
Steam EPA will be determining the greenhouse gases associated with the generation of the steam that you purchase. We will be contacting you for additional information regarding the source of the steam generated.					Specify:
Total Energy Generated Off-Site	237,134.00	249,076.00	256,241.20		MMBtus

Sources of Energy Generated On-Site
	Baseline	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Units
Calendar Year	2003	2004	2005	2006	Units
Coal					Specify:
Natural Gas	6,826	28,000	64,700		MMBtus Specify:
Crude Oil					Specify:
Fuel Oil	120,154	114,800	96,900		MMBtus Specify:
Diesel	1,092	1,300	6,500		MMBtus Specify:
Propane/LPG					Specify:
Gasoline					Specify:
Hydrogen Powered Fuel Cells					Specify:
Natural Gas/Methane Powered Fuel Cells					Specify:
Biomass					Specify:
Solar					Specify:
Wind					Specify:
Landfill Gas					Specify:
Geothermal					Specify:
Hydroelectric					Specify:
Tire Derived Fuel					Specify:
Other Fuel or Source Specify:					Specify:
Total Energy Generated On-Site	128,072.00	144,100.00	168,100.00		MMBtus

Actual Energy Use Total	Baseline	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Perform. Goal	Units
Total Renewable Energy Use	35,736.09	37,535.75	38,615.55		n/a	MMBtus
Total Non-Renewable Energy Use	329,469.91	355,640.25	385,725.65		n/a	MMBtus
Total Energy Use	365,206.00	393,176.00	424,341.20		n/a	MMBtus
Metric Tons of CO₂ Equivalents	37,760.17	39,917.00	41,735.78		n/a	MTCO2E
Metric Tons of CO₂ Equivalents Offset due to Investments in Green Energy, e.g. green tags		0.0	0.0			MTCO2E
Net Metric Tons of CO₂ Equivalents	37,760.17	39,917.00	41,735.78		n/a	MTCO2E

Normalized Energy Use Total	Baseline	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Perform. Goal	Units
Normalizing Factor	1.0	1.12	1.13
Total Energy Use	365,206.00	351,050.00	375,523.19		351,216.80	MMBtus Specify other:
Net Metric Tons of CO₂ Equivalents	37,760.17	35,640.18	36,934.32		36,091.47	MTCO2E Specify other:
Basis for your Normalizing Factor:

C.1.d	Please list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are reporting these data.

BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration's second commitment is to reduce the generation of, and improve the management of, the facility's hazardous waste.
C.2.a	Briefly describe your activities and achievements related to this commitment or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress this year.
	BAE Systems implemented multiple pollution prevention efforts related to management of discarded metals and universal wastes (e.g., lead and precious metals) and selection of equipment to reduce/eliminate the generation of hazardous wastes. Waste management reduction efforts included elimination of an alcohol waste stream through product recycling. *Note: The normalizing factor for 2004 was changed from 1.15. to 1.12 due to a calculation error.
	Activities Conducted During 2004:	IEWS continued implemention of multiple pollution prevention efforts related to recycling of metals (e.g., lead, silver) and selection of equipment to reduce/eliminate the generation of hazardous waste. Waste management methods are not specifically tracked, but were assessment based on waste characteristics.
C.2.b	Please report your facility's actual performance.

Performance Data
Waste Management Method	Baseline	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Units
Waste Management Method	2003	2004	2005	2006	Units
Incineration Specify other: Combined disposal of incineration and landfill.	52.4	60.3	51.5		Tons Specify other:
Reused/recycled off-site Specify other:	0	0	0.0		Tons Specify other:
Landfill Specify other:	18.7	5.3	15.5		Tons Specify other:
Other management Specify other: Wastewater treatment	0	3.8	3.5		Tons Specify other:
Specify other: Wastewater treatment					Specify other:

Actual Total	Baseline	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Perform. Goal	Units
Total Hazardous Waste	71.10	69.40	70.50		68.90	Tons Specify other:

Normalized Total	Baseline	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Perform. Goal	Units
Normalizing Factor	1.0	1.12	1.13
Total Hazardous Waste	71.10	61.96	62.39		n/a	Tons Specify other:
Basis for your Normalizing Factor:	Hazardous waste disposal quantities will be normalized based on annual sales for the Performance Track member facilities from Business Area information. Actual 2003 annual sales were $1,140 Million. Future sales will be adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

C.2.d	Please list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are reporting these data.

BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration's third commitment is to reduce the generation of, and improve the management of, the facility's non-hazardous waste.
C.3.a	Briefly describe your activities and achievements related to this commitment or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress this year.
	Ongoing recycling efforts were used to control the generation of solid waste at BAE Systems. This recycling included precious metals, paper, cans, scrap metal, and soil. Recycling activities are promoted through the strategic location of containers to collect batteries and paper. Also, outreach communications to encourage recycling and postings regarding our recycling activities are performed. *Note: The normalizing factor for 2004 was changed from 1.15. to 1.12 due to a calculation error.
	Activities Conducted During 2004:	Continued recycling efforts were used to control the generation of solid waste at IEWS. This recycling included precious metals, paper, cans, scrap metal, and soil. Recycling activities are promoted through the strategic location of containers to collect batteries and paper. Also, outreach communications to encourage recycling and postings regarding our recycling activities are performed.
C.3.b	Please report your facility's actual performance.

C.3.d	Please list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are reporting these data.

BAE SYSTEMS Information and Electronic Systems Integration's fourth commitment is to reduce the facility's total water use.
C.4.a	Briefly describe your activities and achievements related to this commitment or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress this year.
	Water usage reduction activites were completed in 2004 at the NCA facility and the anticipated reductions were achieved. *Note: The normalizing factor for 2004 was changed from 1.15. to 1.12 due to a calculation error.
	Activities Conducted During 2004:	Water usage reduction activites used to achieve the proposed goal includes replacement of once-through cooling systems at our Canal Street location. This project was completed in 2004 and IEWS is already accumulating the benefits of this project.
C.4.b	Please report your facility's actual performance.

C.4.d	Please list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are reporting these data.

D.1	Please briefly describe the activities that your facility conducted during the year to interact with the community on environmental issues and to report publicly on environmental performance.
	BAE Systems posts the Performance Track program annual reports on our external web site. Each facility performs an annual evaluation drill which involves the local fire departments. BAE Systems personnel are active in Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs) and with the New Hampshire Business and Industry Association (NHBIA).
D.2	Please indicate which of the following methods your facility plans to use to make its Performance Track Annual Performance Report available to the public. Please check all that apply.
	Web Site
	URL: http://www.eis.na.baesystems.com/about/links.htm
	Attachments (if applicable):

SECTION A: GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION

Section B: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

SECTION C: ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS

C.1 COMMITMENT 1

C.2 COMMITMENT 2

C.3 COMMITMENT 3

C.4 COMMITMENT 4

SECTION D: PUBLIC OUTREACH AND PERFORMANCE REPORTING

SECTION E: SELF-CERTIFICATION OF CONTINUED PROGRAM PARTICIPATION FOR ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT