pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of archdischJournal URL: redirect3.cgi?&&auth=0NUhcL5dkusAoIIMTRVAKi9a8MxekLAgIfWLIzk3I&reftype=publisher&artid=1719107&article-id=1719107&iid=139158&issue-id=139158&jid=150&journal-id=150&FROM=Article|Banner&TO=Publisher|Other|N%2FA&rendering-type=normal&&http://adc.bmj.com/
Arch Dis Child. 2002 March; 86(3): 150–157.
doi: 10.1136/adc.86.3.150.
PMCID: PMC1719107
An evaluation of the First Parent Health Visitor Scheme
A Emond, J Pollock, T Deave, S Bonnell, T Peters, and I Harvey
Institute of Child Health, Education Centre, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8BJ, UK. Email: alan.emond/at/bris.ac.uk
Abstract
Aims: To assess outcomes in families who received the First Parent Health Visitor Scheme (FPHVS), in comparison with families who received conventional ("generic") health visiting.

Methods: Retrospective data on 2113 families were collected during 1986–92 as part of National Health Service (NHS) service provision. Prospective data were collected during 1993–98 on 459 mothers and their children, with outcomes assessed at one year (93% follow up) and two years (80% follow up).

Results: There were no differences between the groups of mothers in self esteem, locus of control, or depression rates. The women who received the FPHVS were more likely to have changed partners, but they also had a wider support network than comparison women, and consulted their general practitioner (GP) less often. Breast feeding rates were higher in the FPHVS mothers, who also gave their infants more fruit juice drinks than the comparison group. No differences were apparent in developmental outcome using the Bayley Scales at 1 and 2 years of age. Both height and weight Z scores at 2 years of age were lower in the FPHVS children than the comparison children. Receipt of the FPHVS was associated with increased use of electric socket covers and lower accident rates in the second year of life. No differences were seen in immunisation rates, uptake of child health surveillance, or use of hospital services. A higher proportion of families who received the FPHVS were registered on the local child protection register compared with comparison families.

Conclusion: Clustering effects dominated the analysis, but overall this evaluation could not show a clear advantage for the FPHVS over conventional health visiting.

Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (131K).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Cox, JL; Holden, JM; Sagovsky, R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782–786. [PubMed]
  • Gibson, CH. A concept analysis of empowerment. J Adv Nurs. 1991 Mar;16(3):354–361. [PubMed]
  • Beck, CT. The effects of postpartum depression on maternal-infant interaction: a meta-analysis. Nurs Res. 1995 44(5):298–304.Sep–Oct; [PubMed]
  • Deal, LW. The effectiveness of community health nursing interventions: a literature review. Public Health Nurs. 1994 Oct;11(5):315–323. [PubMed]
  • Hickey, Gary; Hardyman, Rachel. Using questionnaires to ask nurses about working in the community: problems of definition. Health Soc Care Community. 2000 Jan;8(1):70–74. [PubMed]
  • Farrington, D. Intensive health visiting and the prevention of juvenile crime. Health Visit. 1995 Mar;68(3):100–102. [PubMed]
  • Johnson, Z; Howell, F; Molloy, B. Community mothers' programme: randomised controlled trial of non-professional intervention in parenting. BMJ. 1993 May 29;306(6890):1449–1452. [PubMed]
Figures and Tables
Figure 1 Figure 1
Timeline structure of study.
Figure 2 Figure 2
Enrolment in the prospective phase. Total number of nulliparous women from the seven study centes booking March 1994 to August 1995.
Figure 3 Figure 3
Immunisations as % 1988 data. (A) Primary course; (B) MMR by 2 years; (C) all three pertussis.
Figure 4 Figure 4
Coverage of immunisations and surveillance checks.
Figure 5 Figure 5
Weight Z score changes between examinations: (A) 6 weeks to 9 months; (B) 6 weeks to 18 months; (C) 9 months to 18 months.
Figure 6 Figure 6
Height Z score changes between examinations: (A) 6 weeks to 9 months; (B) 6 weeks to 18 months.