|
When radioactive elements decay, one result is heat. Because it
will contain waste packages with many tons of decaying spent nuclear
fuel and high-level radioactive waste, the underground repository
proposed for Yucca Mountain will generate heat for thousands of
years.
Engineers with the Yucca Mountain Project call the amount of heat
generated by this radioactive decay within a particular area a "thermal
load."
The number, size and contents of the waste packages placed in the
repository will help determine the actual concentrations of heat
within the facility. How these waste packages are arranged will
determine which parts of the repository will become hottest.
Many packages placed closely together will concentrate considerable
heat nearby. This is similar to how heaping the coals in a grill
at the center focuses more intense heat there than at the edges.
Placing these same packages farther apart - a low thermal load -
results in lower temperatures over a greater area.
Scientists consider heat management to be an essential design element
for a repository. This is because the way heat moves through a repository
could affect its rock floors and walls, and therefore the facility’s
ability to do its job.
Each possible arrangement comes with its own potential advantages
and disadvantages. Scientists have conducted extensive underground
and laboratory tests of the man-made materials and the rock at Yucca
Mountain to determine which method of spacing will best contribute
to the safe disposal of highly radioactive materials there.
A high thermal load involves packing a large number of waste packages
into a relatively small area. The waste packages themselves would
be spaced closely together within their own tunnels. Temperatures
in and near these tunnels would reach 200 C (390 F), well above
the boiling point of water.
The main benefit of a high thermal load is that the concentrated
heat would force any moisture in the rock walls of the repository
away from the waste packages. Since corrosion is caused by the presence
of moisture, drier conditions near the packages would lessen corrosion,
and fewer packages would degrade over the thousands of years the
repository would function.
A possible drawback is the likelihood that moisture driven off by
heat would seep back once temperatures cool. Scientists also anticipate
permanent chemical, mechanical, and hydrological changes in the
repository rock, as well as a possible decline in the ability of
some zeolites within the rock at Yucca Mountain to keep radionuclides
from moving outward.
A low thermal load can be achieved by a number of means. These include
increasing the spacing between tunnels and waste packages; combining
hotter radioactive substances in waste packages with cooler ones;
waiting for radioactive materials to decay further, and thus become
cooler, before burying them, or by ventilating the repository for
longer periods of time.
The lower thermal loads that would result could produce peak temperatures
lower than 96 C (204F), below the boiling point of water. Such temperatures
would result in less movement of moisture, lower stresses in the
rock, and more limited changes to minerals and zeolites.
If very little or no rock is heated above the boiling point of water,
permanent mechanical, chemical, or hydrological changes within the
repository would likely be less substantial, and in a smaller volume
of rock, than for a high thermal load.
A possible disadvantage of a low thermal load is that moisture existing
in, and percolating through the rock may contact more waste packages
sooner than in the high thermal load scenario. Engineers believe,
however, that they can use waste packages made from more corrosion-resistant
metals to better resist degradation, as well as by using drip shields
to divert seeping water around the waste packages. Use of multiple
components in this way adds "defense in depth" to the
design.
The decision on how best to manage the heat with a repository will
be based on extensive studies of how heat and moisture will affect
the repository rock. Scientists now believe that a high thermal
load would extend the time that waste packages would remain dry,
thereby extending their lifetimes. A low thermal load, on the other
hand, would cause fewer changes in the rock.
|
|
|