pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of medjournmedJournal URL: redirect3.cgi?&&auth=0h_GmoWvN_efGSpDgcH4uiEJVHex-bt5yl4bH6k4U&reftype=publisher&artid=2329780&article-id=2329780&iid=164604&issue-id=164604&jid=571&journal-id=571&FROM=Article|Banner&TO=Publisher|Other|N%2FA&rendering-type=normal&&http://www.medscapejmed.com
Medscape J Med. 2008; 10(3): 60.
Published online 2008 March 11.
PMCID: PMC2329780
Possible Role of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Schistosomal and Non-Schistosomal-Associated Bladder Cancer
Olfat Ali Hammam, MD, Assistant Professor of Pathology, Ahmed A. Aziz, MD, Professor of Urology, Mamdouh S. Roshdy, MD, Assistant Professor of Urology, and Ahmed M. Abdel Hadi, MD, Professor of Pathology
Olfat Ali Hammam, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt Author's email: drolfathammam/at/hotmail.com.
Disclosure: Olfat Ali Hammam, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships in addition to her employment.

Disclosure: Ahmed A. Aziz, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships in addition to his employment.

Disclosure: Mamdouh S. Roshdy, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships in addition to his employment.

Disclosure: Ahmed M. Abdel Hadi, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships in addition to his employment.

Abstract

Background and Purpose
Cyclooxygenase (COX) is an angiogenic factor that is strongly related to inflammatory diseases and the development of cancer and metastasis in several cancers. It is overexpressed in a variety of premalignant and malignant conditions, including urinary bladder cancer. Our aim was to investigate and compare the expression of COX-2 enzyme in patients with bladder cancer, chronic cystitis, and normal bladder tissue. The results were correlated to the classic prognostic factors, mainly tumor stage and grade, in a trial to determine the prognostic significance of COX-2 marker.

Materials and Methods
Seventy-five bladder samples were taken, including 50 cases with bladder cancer (31 were schistosomal-associated and 19 non-schistosomal-associated), 20 samples from cases with chronic cystitis (7 were nonschistosomal and 13 were schistosomal cystitis), and 5 samples from normal bladder tissue taken as control. The specimens were stained by streptavidin-biotin immunohistochemistry protocol, with COX-2 monoclonal antibody.

Results
Although no notable expression of COX-2 was observed in the normal bladder, it was slightly expressed in chronic cystitis especially in areas of dysplasia and squamous metaplasia, whereas there was a significant increase in COX-2 (P < .001) with moderate-to-strong granular cytoplasmic expression in all malignant histologic types. The COX-2 reactivity was higher in transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) than in squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) (P < .01). COX-2 expression was significantly higher in schistosomal-associated TCC than in non-schistosomal-associated TCC (P < .01). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between COX-2 expression and tumor grade (P = .0052). COX-2 expression was significantly higher in grade 3 bladder TCC than in grades 1 and 2 bladder TCC (P < .05, P < .01). A correlation between COX-2 expression and progression of bladder TCC also was observed (P = .001). There was a significant difference in COX-2 expression level between the bladder TCCs at different clinical stages (P < .01).

Conclusion
COX-2 is overexpressed in schistosomal-associated bladder cancer. COX-2 may be of significance to the development and proliferation of bladder TCC, consistent with a potential role for COX-2 inhibitors in the prevention and management of this disease.

Introduction

Schistosomiasis is a widespread parasitic infection caused by blood flukes of the genus Schistosoma and transmitted by specific freshwater snails. The infection is reported to have plagued humans since ancient times.[1] Some of the factors that influence the transmission of schistosomiasis in an endemic area include the presence of snail intermediate hosts of the parasites and human contact with the infected waters. Out of the 3 main human-infecting species of Schistosoma (S haematobium, S mansoni, and S japonicum), S haematobium is the predominant species in Africa – endemic in about 53 countries in Africa and the Middle East.[2,3] In Egypt, bladder cancer accounts for about 30% of all cancers, where it is the most common malignancy in men and the second most common malignancy in women after breast cancer,[46] and has been associated with many pathogenetic factors – most commonly bilharzial infestation, which is an endemic infection in the Nile River Valley.[6,7] In countries with a long history of schistosomiasis, research studies have identified the following risk factors for infection with S haematobium: male gender, an age < 20 years, living in smaller rural communities, exposure to canal waters, reagent strip detected hematuria and proteinuria, and a history of burning micturition.[1,810] Most investigators have accepted the association between schistosomiasis and bladder cancer since the work of Ferguson in 1911.[11] Evidence for this relationship derives from the geographic correlation between the conditions and the distinctive patterns of sex and age at diagnosis; the development of bladder cancer in a younger age group affects males more, is usually associated with schistosomal infection, and shows a high mortality rate and clinicopathologic features of schistosomal-associated bladder cancer (SABC).[4,12,13] The high frequency of squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) is due to schistosomiasis-infested bladders that frequently show squamous metaplasia and dysplasia of the transitional epithelium.[12,13] A relative increase in the frequency of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC)-associated bladder cancer has been noted.[4]

Studies involving a range of human malignancies have shown significant overexpression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 in tumors compared with normal tissues, with an increase in the level of its downstream prostaglandin (PG) products.[1416] COX catalyzes the conversion of arachidonic acid to PGs by 2 different COX isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2. COX-1 is constitutively expressed in most tissues and mediates the synthesis of PGs required for normal physiologic functions, whereas COX-2 is primarily responsible for PGs produced in inflammatory sites and undetectable in most tissues (normal tissues) under physiologic conditions, but it is induced by cytokines, growth factors, oncogenes, and tumor promoters.[1720] The PGs produced by COX-2 promote tumor development by stimulating cell proliferation and angiogenesis and by suppressing programmed cell death and immune defense.[21]

Numerous reports from human epidemiologic studies, animal models, and in vitro cell culture experiments now suggest that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX inhibitors have chemopreventive effects against colon cancer and reduce the risk for colorectal cancer.[1619,22]

COX-2 has been found to be upregulated and overexpressed in tumors of the colon,[23,24] stomach, pancreas, and lung cancers as well as in bladder cancer, suggesting an important role for COX-2 in their tumorigenesis.[2527] For the urinary bladder there have been several reports of COX-2 upregulation in nonschistosomal bladder cancer, and on the potential role of nonselective and selective COX-2 inhibitors in suppressing experimental tumorigenesis. This tumor-specific expression of COX-2 suggested to the authors the potential utility of this COX-2 promoter for the construction of a novel replication-selective adenovirus for the treatment of bladder cancer.[2830]

In the present study, we investigated the predictive value of COX-2 in the development of schistosomal and nonschistosomal bladder lesions because of its potential therapeutic implications. We also investigated and compared the expression of COX-2 in patients with bladder cancer, chronic cystitis, and normal bladder tissue. The results were correlated to the classic prognostic factors, mainly tumor stage and grade, in a trial to determine the prognostic significance of COX-2 marker.

Material and Methods

The study included 75 patients (64 men and 11 women) between ages 25 and 75 years. Patients were subjected to detailed history taking, full and complete clinical examination, urine analysis and routine laboratory investigations, urine cytology abdominal-pelvic ultrasonography, excretory urography, cystoscopic examination, and transurethral resection biopsies taken from the apparent lesions. Specimens were obtained from the urology department of Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), Cairo, Egypt, and fixed in buffered formalin 10% and sent to the pathology department, TBRI. Serial sections were examined histopathologically and assessed for tumor grade according to the World Health Organization (WHO)[31] and pathologic tumor stage, in accordance with the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC).[32] Informed consent from all patients underwent cystoscopy, and biopsies from apparent growth and lesions were taken. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of TBRI according to the Institutional Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects and adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland. Diagnosis of schistosomal infestation was based on detection of Schistosoma eggs in tissues and/or detection of circulating Schistosoma antibodies in sera of patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

All specimens were processed into paraffin blocks; 5-micrometer (mcm)-thick sections were cut on slides, which were treated with TESPA (3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane, Sigma) for immunohistochemistry (IHC).

IHC Procedures
For IHC, a standard 3-layer protocol was used, as previously described.[15] Unstained sections were processed for immunostaining with COX-2 monoclonal antibody as follows: Positive control sections were added to be processed with the bladder tissue sections in the same run for precision and standardization of the elaborated IHC result. The sections were deparaffinized with xylene and then dehydrated with 100%, 98%, and 70% ethanol. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by immersing slides in methanol with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 30 minutes. The sections were incubated in 5% skim milk for 30 minutes at room temperature. The antibody-binding epitope of the antigen was retrieved by microwave treatment for 30 minutes in boiling 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0). The slides were allowed to cool for 20 minutes in the citrate buffer before further treatment. After a quick rinse in phosphate buffered saline, 2 sections were covered with COX-2 primary antibody and COX-2 used at a dilution of 1:50, and incubated for 24 hours in a humid chamber. (The COX-2 monoclonal antibody Catalog number is C-20 and can be purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Company, Santa Cruz, California.) The sections were then incubated for 30 minutes with the secondary biotinylated antibody followed by avidin peroxidase complex for another 30 minutes according to the manufacturer's instructions (Universal Detection Kit, Dako, Denmark). A brown color was developed with diaminobenzidine for 2-4 minutes, washed in distilled water, and counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin for 1 minute. The entire procedure was performed at room temperature. In addition, negative controls in which the primary antibody was omitted and replaced by phosphate buffered saline were also used. Colonic mucosa known to express COX-2 was used as a positive control.

The expression of COX-2 was measured in 10 successive high-power fields (x400). COX-2 showed mostly cytoplasmic expression with condensation on the nuclear membrane. Two of the authors (O.H. and A.A.) analyzed the intensity, distribution, and pattern, and evaluated COX-2 immunoexpressions independently. If there was a discrepancy, a consensus was reached after further evaluation. The percentage of positively stained cells was determined semiquantitatively by assessing the whole tumor section, and each sample was assigned to one of the following categories according to the percentage of positive cells: 0 (0% to 4%), 1 (5% to 24%), 2 (25% to 49%), 3 (50% to 74%), or 4 (75% to 100%).[33] Specimens were regarded as COX-2-negative if less than 5% of the cells were stained and COX-2-positive if 5% or above of the cells were stained.

Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis of the results was done with analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare COX-2 scores. Results were given as mean ±SD. Distribution of negative and positive cases was studied with cross tables (Z-test). To investigate a possible correlation of COX-2 scores with tumor grade and stage, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used (SPSS software program, version 9). In all tests, P < .05 was considered to indicate significant.

Results

The median age (range) of the 75 patients (64 men and 11 women) was 50.24 (25-75) years. They were grouped accordingly.

Group I
Four men and 1 woman (age range, 20-48 years), with normal healthy urothelium, served as the control group undergoing cystoscopy for reasons other than lower urinary tract symptoms; uretroscopy or ureteric catheter or double-J insertion and biopsies were taken upon their consent.

Group II
The benign bladder lesions group included 20 cases, classified as:
  • 7 cases with chronic nonschistosomal cystitis and
  • 13 cases with chronic schistosomal cystitis, which include
    • 9 cases with premalignant lesions (3 cases with squamous metaplasia, 5 cases showing dysplastic changes, and 1 case with leukoplakia) and
    • 4 cases with simple schistosomal cystitis.

Group III
Malignant group: 50 cases from this group were subclassified into 2 groups:
  • SqCC: 16 cases; all cases were associated with schistosomiasis, and all were invasive (pT2 + PT4). Four tumors were grade 1 (well-differentiated), 6 grade 2 (moderately differentiated), and 6 grade 3 (poorly differentiated).
  • TCC: 34 cases included 15 cases of schistosomal-associated TCC and 19 cases of non-schistosomal-associated TCC. For research purposes, pathologic staging of TCC was identified as 11 superficial tumors (pTa and pT1) and 23 invasive tumors (pT2, pT3, and pT4). Twelve tumors were grade I, 12 grade II, and 10 grade III.

In group I (control cases), there was no expression of COX-2 in the urothelial cells. However, 6 out of 20 cases (30%) in group II (chronic cystitis group) showed positive expression of COX-2 in the urothelial cells (5 of the 6 positive for COX-2 were chronic schistosomal cystitis). The urothelium in these positive cases had focal squamous metaplasia and/or showed areas of dysplasia. COX-2 reactivity was detected infrequently and at a weak intensity in the urothelium (Figures 13). In the dysplastic areas, staining was usually more intense in the basal layers of the epithelium. The COX-2 expression was significantly higher in schistosomal cystitis than in nonschistosomal cystitis (P < .05). The smooth muscles and endothelial cells within the sections with no tumor did not express COX-2 (Table 1).

Figure 1Figure 1
Cyclooxygenase-2 expression and distribution of positive cases in different studied bladder lesions.
Figure 2Figure 2
A control case, negative for cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression (immunostain for COX-2, diaminobenzidine, x40 micrometers [mcm]).
Figure 3Figure 3
A case of chronic schistosomal cystitis, showing mild cytoplasmic expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, involving the whole layers of the urothelium (immunostain for COX-2, diaminobenzidine, x40 micrometers [mcm]).
Table 1Table 1
COX-2 Expression and Distribution of Positive Cases in Different Studied Bladder Lesions

For group III, in all positive cases, COX-2 expression was more pronounced in the tumor cells than in the nonmalignant urothelium (P < .01). In tumor cells, the expression was mainly cytoplasmic and granular with occasional focal condensation around the nuclear envelope. Also, the expression of COX-2 positivity is markedly heterogeneous in most cases of TCC and SqCC, in which the percentage and intensity of positive staining markedly varied from one field of the tumor to another, whereas homogeneous staining was usually obtained in tumors of higher grade. COX-2 expression was significantly higher in TCC (22 of 34 positive cases for COX-2, 64.8%) than in SqCC (7 of 16 positive cases, 43.2%) (P < .01). Also, COX-2 expression was significantly higher in schistosomal TCC (13 of 15 positive cases, 85.2%) than in nonschistosomal TCC (9 of 19 positive cases, 47.3%) (P < .01). COX-2 expression was significantly higher in grade 3 bladder TCC than in grades 1 and 2 (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively) (Figures 47). Also, there was a significant difference in COX-2 expression level between the bladder TCCs at different clinical stages between the superficial and invasive tumors (P < .01) (Table 2). There was a significant and positive correlation between COX-2 expression and tumor grade (rs = 0.38, P = .0052) and with tumor stage (pT) (rs = 0.44, P = .0035).

Figure 4Figure 4
A case of superficial papillary transitional cell carcinoma, grade 1, showing moderate cytoplasmic expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 in about 50% of malignant urothelial cells (immunostain for COX-2, diaminobenzidine, x40 micrometers [mcm]).
Figure 5Figure 5
A case of invasive transitional cell carcinoma, grade 2, showing marked cytoplasmic expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 in the majority of malignant urothelial cells (immunostain for COX-2, diaminobenzidine, x40 micrometers [mcm]).
Figure 6Figure 6
A case of schistosomal-associated moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma showing moderate cytoplasmic expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 in about 70% of the malignant squamous cells (immunostain for COX-2, diaminobenzidine, x20 micrometers (more ...)
Figure 7Figure 7
A case of well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma showing focal cytoplasmic expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 in the malignant squamous cells (immunostain for COX-2, diaminobenzidine, x20 micrometers [mcm]).
Table 2Table 2
COX-2 Expression and Distribution in Different Histopathologic Grades and Stages of TCC

Discussion

Data on the role of COX enzymes in SABC are lacking. In our work, COX-2 was expressed in none of the 5 normal bladder specimens, in accordance with the results of Margulis and colleagues,[34] who showed no expression of COX-2 in all 9 control cases. We assessed the nonmalignant but chronically inflamed and metaplastic urothelium commonly associated with schistosomal infestation from patients with SABC. There was notable COX-2 positivity, and a significantly increased expression of COX-2 in schistosomal cystitis than in nonschistosomal cystitis, in contrast to previously published studies of nonmalignant nonschistosomal urothelium, in which completely negative staining has always been reported.[28,29] Upregulation of COX-2 expression may result from the severe and chronic inflammatory reaction commonly associated with chronic schistosomal infestation, and which has been described in active inflammation, eg, inflamed, nondysplastic colonic mucosa in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.[35]

In the present study, we found increased COX-2 positivity in group III in schistosomal-associated TCC and SqCC. The present results are consistent with those obtained by El-Sheikh and colleagues[36] in cases with SABC and those obtained by Kömhoff and coworkers,[26] Mohammed and coworkers,[27] Diamantopoulou and colleagues,[37] Wadhwa and coworkers,[38] Wild and coworkers,[39] and Gurocak and colleagues[40] in cases with non-SABC.

The overexpression of COX-2 in tumor cells can be attributed to transcriptional and posttranscriptional factors. The COX-2 gene promoter contains transcriptional regulatory elements linked to multiple signaling pathways downstream of growth factors and cytokines.[18] The proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, which are produced by activated macrophages at the sites of chronic inflammation, are inducers of COX-2 expression[41] and may contribute to mechanisms by which chronic inflammation initiates transformation of urothelial cells in SABC. However, the inflammatory reaction alone cannot account for upregulated COX-2 expression in SABC because the nonmalignant epithelium exposed to the same inflammatory stimuli had a significantly lower level of COX-2. Growth factors with tyrosine kinase second messengers, eg, epidermal growth factor (EGF) and TGF-alpha, are also known to be inducers of COX-2,[42] and both are involved in progression of bladder neoplasia, including SABC[43] and N-nitrosamine-induced bladder cancer.[44] In addition, activating H-ras mutations detected in cases of nonschistosomal and SABC[45] can upregulate the expression of COX-2 and increase the stability of COX-2 mRNA by 3.5-fold, providing an additional source of increased COX-2 activity by posttranscriptional regulation.[46]

N-Nitroso compounds, the chemical carcinogens present in higher levels in patients with urinary schistosomiasis,[47] are possible targets for this upgraded COX-2 activity. Moreover, increased COX-2 expression, partly brought about by the normal physiologic response to injury and inflammation, may accelerate genetic damage through the increased production of malondialdehyde, a mutagenic byproduct of COX-mediated PG synthesis and lipid peroxidation.[48]

In the current work, we found that there was a statistically significant positive correlation between COX-2 expression and tumor grade (P = .01). COX-2 expression was significantly higher in grade 3 bladder TCC than in grades 1 and 2 (P < .05, P < .01). Correlation between COX-2 expression and progression of bladder TCC was observed; there was a significant difference in COX-2 expression level between the superficial TCC and invasive TCC (P < .01). These results are in accordance with El-Sheikh and colleagues[36] who confirmed COX-2 overexpression in SABC and a significant correlation between COX-2 and tumor grade. There was no correlation between the stage of SABC and COX-2 reactivity in their study.i

A previous study of 75 non-SABC TCCs by Kömhoff and coworkers[26] showed that COX-2 is highly expressed in malignant bladder tumors but not in benign bladder tissues; also, they detected no correlation between COX-2 expression and the individual clinical stages pTa-pT4, although such a correlation was present when stages pT1-pT4 were combined and compared with noninvasive TCC (pTa). Schmitz and colleagues[49] demonstrated in their study of cases with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma high levels of COX-2 expression associated with reduced apoptosis and increased proliferation of tumor cells, and concluded that COX-2 expression is an independent prognostic factor in resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, offering a potential adjuvant to therapeutic approach with COX-2 inhibitors.

There is much evidence that the COX-2 gene is involved in features of tumor aggressiveness, such as invasiveness and metastasis.[41] For example, COX-2 increases adhesion to the extracellular matrix and reduces the level of the cell-adhesion molecule, E-cadherin, in rat intestinal epithelial cells.[41] Human colon cancer cells transfected with a COX-2 expression vector have increased activity of metalloproteinase-2, which is necessary for the degradation of extracellular matrix, resulting in increased tumor cell migration.[50] However, there is no evidence that COX-2 is associated with invasiveness and metastasis in human tumors.

In the present study, COX-2 was expressed in muscle-invasive bladder tumors that are at a more advanced stage than superficial-type tumors; this is in accordance with the results of Wadhwa and coworkers,[38] Gurocak and colleagues,[40] and Margulis and colleagues.[34] Thus, it would be interesting to determine in additional studies whether COX-2 is a prognostic factor in bladder tumors.

The mechanism of elevated COX-2 expression in tumor cells may depend on the activation of oncogenes. Activation of the K-ras oncogene is associated with an elevated expression of COX-2,[32,33,41] and the K-ras oncogene is frequently activated in bladder tumors.[35] This particular mechanism may help explain the level of COX-2 expression found in bladder tumors. COX activates many carcinogens, one of which binds directly to hot spots for mutation in the p53 gene in lung[27] and bladder[26] cancer. Thus, COX may be involved in tumorigenesis by inactivating tumor suppressor genes, such as p53.

PGs have also been found to induce glutathione S-transferase-pi, an enzyme linked to cisplatin chemoresistance in bladder cancer.[51] In cases of SABC, the expression and activity of this enzyme were higher in tumor tissues than in uninvolved tissues.[52] The chemopreventive potential reported for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including aspirin, ketoprofen, piroxicam, and the recently developed specific COX-2 inhibitors, are thought to be mediated by the induction of apoptosis and are effective against the development of superficial rat urinary bladder carcinomas even after initiation with N-nitrosamines.[53]

In conclusion, TCC tissue in the bladder, especially the muscle-invasive type, frequently expresses COX-2. Thus, there may be a link between COX-2 expression and the development and progression of TCC in the bladder. Additional investigations are needed to determine whether COX-2 expression has any prognostic value and whether COX-2 inhibitors are useful for chemoprevention and cancer treatment of bladder tumors. Additional work is required to elucidate the possible downstream molecular targets of COX-2 products, and to assess the potential role of selective COX-2 inhibitors in preventing and treating SABC. Meanwhile, consideration of low-cost COX-2 inhibition in areas of endemic schistosomal infestation may be a simple and affordable intervention to limit the development and possibly the progression of SABC, diminishing such a devastating disease.

Footnotes
Readers are encouraged to respond to the author at drolfathammam/at/hotmail.com or to George Lundberg, MD, Editor in Chief of The Medscape Journal of Medicine, for the editor's eyes only or for possible publication as an actual Letter in the Medscape Journal via email: glundberg/at/medscape.net
All author affiliations

Olfat Ali Hammam, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt Author's email: drolfathammam/at/hotmail.com.

Ahmed A. Aziz, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt.

Mamdouh S. Roshdy, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt.

Ahmed M. Abdel Hadi, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt.

References
1.
El-Harvey, MA; Amr, MM; Abdel-Rahman, AB, et al. The epidemiology of schistosomiasis in Egypt: Gharbia Governorate. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;62(suppl):42–48. [PubMed]
2.
Ejezie, GC. The epidemiology and control of schistosomiasis in Africa. Nigeria J Med. 1991;1:29–30.
3.
Ogbe, GM. Schistosoma haematobium: a review of the relationship between prevalence, intensity and age. Nigeria J Parasitol. 1995;16:39–46.
4.
Mostafa, MH; Sheweita, SA; O'Connor, PJ. Relationship between schistosomiasis and bladder cancer. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12:97–111. [PubMed]
5.
Jemel, A; Murray, T; Ward, E, et al. Cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:10–30.
6.
El-Mawla, NG; El-Bolkainy, MN; Khalid, HM. Bladder cancer in Africa: update. Semin Oncol. 2001;28:174–178. [PubMed]
7.
El Sebaie, M; Zaghloul, MS; Howard, G, et al. Sqamous cell carcinoma of the bilharzial and non-bilharzial urinary bladder: a review of etiological features, natural history, and management. Int J Clin Oncol. 2005;10:20–25. [PubMed]
8.
Abdel-Wahab, MF; Esmat, G; Ramzy, I, et al. The epidemiology of schistosomiasis in Egypt: Fayoum Governorate. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;62(suppl):55–64. [PubMed]
9.
Gabar, SN; Tarek, AH; Anwar, O; Eglal, S; Mahmoud, AK; Thomas, GS. Epidemiology of schistosomiasis in Egypt: Minyo Governorate. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;62(suppl):65–75.
10.
Koraitim, MM; Metwalli, NE; Atta, MA; El Sadr, AA. Changing age incidence and pathological types of schistosoma-associated bladder carcinoma. J Urol. 1995;154:1714–1716. [PubMed]
11.
Ferguson, AR. Associated bilharziasis and primary malignant diseases of the urinary bladder with observation on a series of forty cases. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1911;16:76–94.
12.
El Bolkainy, MN; Mokhtar, NM; Ghoneim, MA; Hussein, MH. The impact of schistosomiasis on the pathology of bladder carcinoma. Cancer. 1981;48:2643–2648. [PubMed]
13.
Zimmermann, KC; Sarbia, M; Weber, AA; Borchard, F; Gabbert, HE; Schror, K. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1999;59:198–204. [PubMed]
14.
Madaan, S; Abel, PD; Chaudhary, KS, et al. Cytoplasmic induction and over-expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human prostate cancer: implications for prevention and treatment. BJU Int. 2000;86:736–741. [PubMed]
15.
Lim, HY; Joo, HJ; Choi, JH, et al. Increased expression of cyclooxygenase-2 protein in human gastric carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:519–525. [PubMed]
16.
Spencer, AG; Woods, J; Arakawa, T; Singer, II; Smith, WL. Subcellular localization of prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthases-1 and -2 by immunoelectron microscopy. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:9886–9893. [PubMed]
17.
Smith, W; DeWitt, D; Garavito, R. Cyclooxygenases: structural, cellular, and molecular biology. Ann Rev Biochem. 2000;69:145–182. [PubMed]
18.
Sububaramaiha, K; Zakim, D; Weksler, BB. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase: a novel approach to cancer prevention. Exp Biol Med. 1997;216:201–206.
19.
Crofford, LJ; Wilder, RL; Ristimaki, AP, et al. Cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 expression in rheumatoid synovial tissues: effects of interleukin-1b, phorbol ester, and corticosteroids. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:1095–1101. [PubMed]
20.
Marks, F; Furstenberger, G; Muller-Decker, K. Tumor promotion as a target of cancer prevention. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2007;174:37–47. [PubMed]
21.
DuBois, RN; Giardiello, FM; Smalley, WE. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, eicosanoids, and colorectal cancer prevention. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1996;25:773–791. [PubMed]
22.
Mohammed, SI; Dhawan, D; Abraham, S, et al. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors in urinary bladder cancer: in vitro and in vivo effects. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:329–336. [PubMed]
23.
Yoshimura, R; Matsuyama, M; Tsuchida, K; Takemoto, Y; Nakatani, T. Relationship between cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and malignant tumors. Nippon Rinsho. 2005;63:1839–1848. [PubMed]
24.
Sano, H; Kawahito, Y; Wilder, RL, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1995;55:3785–3791. [PubMed]
25.
Yoshimura, R; Sano, H; Masuda, C, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in prostate carcinoma. Cancer (Phila). 2000;89:589–595. [PubMed]
26.
Komhoff, M; Guan, Y; Shappell, HW, et al. Enhanced expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in high-grade human transitional cell bladder carcinomas. Am J Pathol. 2000;157:29–35. [PubMed]
27.
Mohammed, SI; Knapp, DW; Bostwick, DG, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in human invasive transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urinary bladder. Cancer Res. 1999;59:5647–5650. [PubMed]
28.
Shirahama, T. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is up regulated in transitional cell carcinoma and its preneoplastic lesions in the human urinary bladder. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:2424–2430. [PubMed]
29.
Okajima, E; Denda, A; Ozono, S, et al. Chemopreventive effects of nimesulide, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, on the development of rat urinary bladder carcinomas initiated by N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine. Cancer Res. 1998;58:3028–3031. [PubMed]
30.
Dovedi, SJ; Kirby, JA; Atkins, H; Davies, BR; Kelly, JD. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition: a potential mechanism for increasing the efficacy of bacillus calmette-guerin immunotherapy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2005;174:332–337. [PubMed]
31.
Mostofi, F; Sobin, L; Torloni, H. International Classification of Tumors. Vol 10. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1973. Histological typing of urinary bladder tumours.
32.
Hermanek P, Sobin L. , editors. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 4th ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1992. pp. 309–313.
33.
Krajewski, S; Krajewska, M; Ehrmann, J, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of Bcl-2, Bcl-X, Mcl-1, and Bax in tumors of central and peripheral nervous system origin. Am J Pathol. 1997;150:805–814. [PubMed]
34.
Margulis, V; Shariat, SF; Ashfaq, R, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in normal urothelium, and superficial and advanced transitional cell carcinoma of bladder. J Urol. 2007;177:1163–1168. [PubMed]
35.
Agoff, SN; Brentnall, TA; Crispin, DA, et al. The role of cyclooxygenase 2 in ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasia. Am J Pathol. 2000;157:737–745. [PubMed]
36.
El-Sheikh, S; Madaan, S; Alhasso, A, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2: a possible target in schistosoma-associated bladder cancer. BJU. 2001;88:921–929.
37.
Diamantopoulou, K; Lazaris, A; Mylona, E, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 protein expression in relation to apoptotic potential and its prognostic significance in bladder urothelial carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2005;25:4543–4549. [PubMed]
38.
Wadhwa, P; Goswami, AK; Joshi, K; Sharma, SK. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression increases with the stage and grade in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37:47–53. [PubMed]
39.
Wild, PJ; Kunz-Schughart, LA; Stoehr, R, et al. High-throughput tissue microarray analysis of COX2 expression in urinary bladder cancer. Int J Oncol. 2005;27:385–391. [PubMed]
40.
Gurocak, S; Sozen, S; Erdem, O, et al. Relation between cyclooxygenase-2 expression and clinicopathologic parameters with patient prognosis in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Urol Int. 2006;76:51–56. [PubMed]
41.
Huang, ZF; Massey, JB; Via, DP. Differential regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) mRNA stability by interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in human in vitro differentiated macrophages. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000;59:187–194. [PubMed]
42.
Saha, D; Datta, PK; Sheng, H, et al. Synergistic induction of cyclooxygenase-2 by transforming growth factor-beta 1 and epidermal growth factor inhibits apoptosis in epithelial cells. Neoplasia. 1999;1:508–517. [PubMed]
43.
Tungekar, M; Linehan, J. Patterns of expressions of transforming growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor in squamous cell lesions of the urinary bladder. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51:583–587. [PubMed]
44.
Marjou, A; Delouvee, A; Thiery, J; Radvanyi, F. Involvement of epidermal growth factor receptor in chemically induced mouse bladder tumour progression. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:2211–2218. [PubMed]
45.
Badawi, AF. Molecular and genetic events in schistosomiasis-associated human bladder cancer: role of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Cancer Lett. 1999;105:123–138. [PubMed]
46.
Gilhooly, EM; Rose, DP. The association between a mutated ras gene and cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human breast cancer cell lines. Int J Oncol. 1999;15:267–270. [PubMed]
47.
Abdel Mohsen, M; Hassan, A; El-Sewedy, S, et al. Human bladder cancer, schistosomiasis, N-nitroso compounds and their precursors. Int J Cancer. 2000;88:682–683. [PubMed]
48.
Marnett, L. Chemistry and biology of DNA damage by malondialdehyde. IARC Sci Publ. 1999;150:17–27. [PubMed]
49.
Schmitz, KJ; Lang, H; Wohlschlaeger, J, et al. Elevated expression of cyclooxygenase-2 is a negative prognostic factor for overall survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2007;450:135–141. [PubMed]
50.
McDonnell, TJ; Korsmeyer, SJ. Progression from lymphoid hyperplasia to high-grade malignant lymphoma in mice transgenic for t (14:18). Nature. 1991;349:254–256. [PubMed]
51.
Kawamoto, Y; Nakamura, Y; Naito, Y, et al. Cyclopentenone prostaglandins as potential inducers of phase II detoxification enzymes. 15-deoxy-delta(12,14)-prostaglandin j2-induced expression of glutathione S-transferases. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:11291–11299. [PubMed]
52.
Hassan, A; Tagliabue, G; Codegoni, A; D'Incalci, M; El-Sewedy, S; Airoldi, L. Glutathione S-transferase activity and glutathione content in human bladder carcinoma associated with schistosomiasis: comparison with uninvolved surrounding tissues. Cancer Lett. 2000;121:19–23. [PubMed]
53.
Okajima, E; Denda, A; Ozono, S, et al. Chemopreventive effects of nimesulide, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, on the development of rat urinary bladder carcinomas initiated by N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl) nitrosamine. Cancer Res. 1998;58:3028–3031. [PubMed]