E-Mail-2000-2399
| # | Sender | Subject | Date | Body |
| EM-2000 | Denny Newton <NEWTON2551@comcast.net> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/4/2008 10:42:53 |
I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. Sincerely, YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS Dennis Newton 591 W. Sherman Apt. 9 Lebanon, OR 97355 |
| EM-2001 | Michael Brown <miguelcafe@mac.com> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/4/2008 10:55:14 | I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. My opinion is that the WOPR is a *bad* idea. Sincerely, Michael D Brown 2850 Warren St Eugene, OR 97405 |
| EM-2002 | Steven Harrison <smharrisnvirginia@hotmail.com> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/4/2008 10:57:12 | I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks.
Sincerely, Steven Harrison 48080 SE Coalman Rd Sandy OR 97055 Make distant family not so distant with Windows Vista® + Windows LiveT. Start now! |
| EM-2003 | Mary Brown <mcb@cadence.com> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/4/2008 11:09:28 | I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks.
Sincerely, MaryBrown 2850 Warren St. Eugene, OR97405 |
| EM-2004 | Charlotte Sahnow <csahnow@oregon.uoregon.edu> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/4/2008 11:52:04 | January 4, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely Charlotte Sahnow 2756 Chad Dr Eugene, OR 97408-7306 |
| EM-2005 | John Janus <unokayakero@yahoo.com> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/4/2008 12:13:16 | Dear BLM,
I live in Oregon for a variety of reasons, including the old-growth forests, excellent recreation, and opportunities to view wildlife on public lands. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will degrade my ability to enjoy the public lands in western Oregon. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing will unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Some of my concerns include: - I'm disappointed that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. These areas contain unique values that many people seek out to enjoy. These areas should not be opened to logging. - The increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. Over 1,000 miles of new logging road and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. - Clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy - catering to the timber and motorized vehicle industry alone is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. But the WOPR is a step back to the unsustainable days of clear-cutting this amazing resource, endangering wildlife, muddying streams, and fueling public outcry. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. John Janus 23818 Henderson Corvallis, OR 97333 |
| EM-2006 | John Janus <unokayakero@yahoo.com> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/4/2008 12:13:42 | Dear BLM,
I live in Oregon for a variety of reasons, including the old-growth forests, excellent recreation, and opportunities to view wildlife on public lands. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will degrade my ability to enjoy the public lands in western Oregon. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing will unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Some of my concerns include: - I'm disappointed that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. These areas contain unique values that many people seek out to enjoy. These areas should not be opened to logging. - The increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. Over 1,000 miles of new logging road and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. - Clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy - catering to the timber and motorized vehicle industry alone is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. But the WOPR is a step back to the unsustainable days of clear-cutting this amazing resource, endangering wildlife, muddying streams, and fueling public outcry. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. John Janus 23818 Henderson Corvallis, OR 97333 |
| EM-2007 | Richard Russell <ahcenter@msn.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/4/2008 12:32:05 | January 4, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Protecting our streams and forests is the most important task or our government, especially here in Oregon. The value of our forests and streams, and the fish,game,and recreation they provide is far greater if left in their natural state than any economic benefit to be gained by exploiting them in the short run. Sincerely Richard L Russell 2117 Dennis Ray Ave NE Keizer, OR 97303-2007 |
| EM-2008 | Christine Lawson <christinelawson@mac.com> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/4/2008 12:50:29 | I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. Please consider permanent protection old growth forests for the generations to come to enjoy. In turn keeping Oregon green and protecting wildlife habitat and clear streams. Sincerely, Christine Lawson 2891 N Emerson Ct Portland Oregon 97217 |
| EM-2009 | Cameron Hyde <cameron@sdra.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/4/2008 13:12:02 | January 4, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely Cameron Hyde 3150 SW Hamilton St Portland, OR 97239-1312 |
| EM-2010 | Dave Emrich <dave.emrich@homepower.com> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/4/2008 14:06:00 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very disturbed with the direction the Bush regime is headed with the mis-management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and will definitely lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is totally outrageous and completely unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is clearcut stupidity that depletes our natural resource base for your children by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace alternative building methods, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We will protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Enough is enough! Earth First! David Emrich 299 Gresham St. Ashland, OR 97520 -- ********************************* David Emrich Graphic Designer, Home Power Magazine 541-512-1631 ********************************* |
| EM-2011 | Jim Salter <mcsalty@hughes.net> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/4/2008 15:36:20 | I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. I was born and raised in Oregon and have lived in logging communities for many years. I know the timber industry and its contribution to local economies, as well as some of the costs of this economy to these same communities and our public resource base. Timber is one renewable resource and is necessarily harvested for its valuable uses, but there are many other resources and assets which are a part of the forests which are already of incalculable valuable to the public health and many other parts of our state's overall economy. Logging irresponsibly and degrading our water resources will forever destroy the much more valuable public resources contained in those pristine and sensitive areas which the plan needlessly targets. This plan seems a foolhardy, pound foolish, and greed driven approach which could easily be adjusted to protect the more sensitive areas while still increasing supply to the timber industry. The plan plainly works against the true public interest by grossly ignoring the real value of biological and wildlife resources, our clean water assets, and the super carbon capture capability of our old growth trees. I am firmly opposed to the adoption or implementation of this plan without major changes to its "revised" management approach. Sincerely, James Salter 19909 SW Meadow View Dr. McMinnville, OR 97128 |
| EM-2012 | kerry cutler <rollinggnome@hotmail.com> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/4/2008 15:41:04 | Dear BLM,
I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Kerry Cutler 81868 Lost valley lane Dexter Oregon 97431 _________________________________________________________________ Get the power of Windows + Web with the new Windows Live.http://www.windowslive.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_powerofwindows_012008 |
| EM-2013 | valerie GILES <javagiles@msn.com> | wopr | 1/4/2008 16:51:17 | please harvest timber under wopr and give oregonians real jobs.I received a letter from oregon heritage forests,and it's the same kind of letter that has cost our state families and jobs. I vote for the plan! john giles |
| EM-2014 | Patty Bonney <pattybonney@hotmail.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/4/2008 17:22:03 | January 4, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely Patty Bonney 8625 SW Oleson Rd Portland, OR 97223-6828 |
| EM-2015 | Carole Tante <nuxtabadun@aol.com> | More areas merit wilderness recommendation | 1/4/2008 17:32:01 | January 04, 2008
BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office 333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, OR 97204 Dear BLM Western Oregon Plan Revision, I am writing to urge a reevaluation and expansion of the areas that should be recommended as wilderness in the Western Oregon Plan Revision (WOPR). The Bureau of Land Management�s (BLM) preferred alternative recommends only five areas, despite a total of 146 inventoried areas in the lands managed by the plan. The BLM�s process for evaluating and determining wilderness resources and wilderness recommendations in the WOPR was inadequate, resulting in many well-known wild places exhibiting excellent wilderness characteristics being improperly omitted. The Wild Rogue Additions is a prime example of an area that clearly meets the criteria for wilderness recommendation, and yet was not recommended. In the Wild Rogue North Watershed Analysis, the BLM itself noted the value of the large, roadless areas for aesthetics, solitude, undeveloped recreational opportunities, wildlife, fisheries, water quality, and the intrinsic value of having wild, undeveloped places (see Version 2.0 of this analysis, issued in December 1999 and available online: http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/medford/plans/files/wild_rogue_north_wa_acc.pdf). Despite these findings, BLM omits the Wild Rogue from its wilderness recommendations. BLM�s analysis and recommendations must take into account the economic importance of wilderness as well as the non-commercial values of the public lands it stewards, instead of considering lands primarily for their timber values. This approach demonstrates an unbalanced interpretation of the BLM�s legal obligations, and must be reviewed. Additional areas that should be recommended for wilderness protection include Reuben Creek, Williams Creek, Wild Rogue Additions, Whiskey Creek, Wellington Mountain, Clackamas Wilderness � Bull of the Woods/Opal Creek Additions, and Coast Range Wilderness - Wasson Creek. The WOPR is a heavily forested area, and contains rare old growth with trees that stood before our nation existed. Many of these deserving wild lands should be recommended as wilderness to preserve these ancient giants and the beautiful landscapes that surround them. Failure to protect these increasingly endangered wild places from timber harvest is a mistake that cannot be undone once the old growth trees have been cleared. I urge BLM to reexamine its wilderness recommendations in the WOPR, and to expand the recommendations to include the wild places listed above that should be managed to maintain their wilderness characteristics. Sincerely, Carole Tante 3 Fino Ln Hot Springs Village, AR 71909-3805 USA nuxtabadun@aol.com |
| EM-2016 | lefko <lefko@jeffnet.org> | blm wopr comments | 1/4/2008 18:41:15 | Dear BLM,
Count me as one who is against opening up an ATV area at Anderson Butte. 1. It will increase the fire danger which is already acute. 2. It will increase erosion affecting the salmon runs on Sterling Creek and other streams in the watershed (the salmon runs are now just beginning to increase in these fragile tributaries). 3. ATV use will negatively affect the fragile and rare plant ecosystems within the watershed, including the savanna oak forests. 4. ATV use will increase the noise pollution in the rural Sterling Creek valley where I live. 5. ATV use will increase carbon-emitting vehicular traffic and increase road maintenance costs. 6. ATV use will negatively affect wildlife causing increasing mammal injuries, including deaths. 7. ATV use will negatively affect the pristine solitude which I regularly enjoy by myself or with friends as we either walk, jog or yes, bicycle, these remote, quiet, beautiful watersheds. So please, reject the ATV park on Anderson Butte. Consider promoting long-term sustainable uses, rather than giving way to such an exclusive, short-term and non-sustainable use. In short, I am against further sacrificing our precious soils, plants, animals, water, air and quiet for the short-term benefits of an ATV park anywhere near Anderson Butte. Best Regards, David Lefkowitz 8900 Sterling Creek RD Jacksonville, OR 97530 541-899-6908 |
| EM-2017 | serge vrabec <vrabec1@aol.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/4/2008 19:12:02 | January 4, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely serge vrabec 5902 SE Milwaukie Ave Portland, OR 97202-5258 |
| EM-2018 | Sean Brady <sa_brady@comcast.net> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/4/2008 21:45:10 | Dear BLM,
My family and I live in Oregon for a variety of reasons, including the old-growth forests, excellent recreation, and opportunities to view wildlife on public lands. We are avid hikers, fly fishers, and campers. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will degrade my ability to enjoy the public lands in western Oregon. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing will unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Some of my concerns include: - I'm disappointed that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. These areas contain unique values that many people seek out to enjoy. These areas should not be opened to logging. - The increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. Over 1,000 miles of new logging road and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. - Clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy - catering to the timber and motorized vehicle industry alone is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. But the WOPR is a step back to the unsustainable days of clear-cutting this amazing resource, endangering wildlife, muddying streams, and fueling public outcry. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. Sean Brady 1124 E 14 Lafayette, OR 97127 |
| EM-2019 | Mark Fritch <Mfritch@loghomz.com> | Protect BLM forests, harvest if needed, but do it wisely | 1/4/2008 23:46:04 | To Whom It May Concerns,
I am a professional forester (BS Forestry, MS Forestry and BA Education) in Sandy, Oregon. I've used my skills, education and interests to build beautiful handcrafted log homes. While I'm concerned for the environment, I realize that harvesting is not the entire problem. The problem is not allowing foresters to WISELY MANAGE of our resources. I have no problem with managing and harvesting our timber resources. I do have a problem with the unwise harvesting and doing so at below market values. I support the harvesting of forests when it makes sense ecologically, financially and biologically. I also recognize the need and place for wilderness areas. We need both. There is a lot of pressure to not do anything with our forests. Many people don't see the forest for the trees. For example, old-growth forests don't necessarily help Global Warming that much. Old-growth trees do put out oxygen, but not at a rate high enough to offset the carbon dioxide produced by the decaying forest matter on the same forest floor. It is young, vibrant forests that do more to cool the atmosphere and produce more net oxygen than old-growth forests. I am not advocating for the harvesting of our wilderness areas. We need both wilderness areas and areas that we can manage and harvest. I encourage the protection of our wilderness areas AND freeing up our state and national forests for the wise management for timber. Another thing that we as Americans don't realize is that we are dumping out harvesting on other countries. If we shut down logging here in the U.S.without reducing our consumption by the same amount, all we are doing is forcing that harvest on Canada, New Zealand, Chile, Russiaor other countries where there are little or no environmental controls. The net result is that we are still damaging the planet. It's just that we "can't see it from our backyard." We are also then forced to transport these products farther than if we produced the lumber right here in Oregon. We have better quality timber which produces better quality lumber which then can be used to produce better quality homes. What we need to do is produce better quality homes that will last longer than the crap houses that we're now building. This would allow us to have good homes while wisely harvesting local forests. The young forests that get replanted will then produce far more oxygen than older mature forests. In saying this, I am not advocating harvesting of all old-growth. I am simply stating that we have a seriously polarized mentality on the issue. There are ways that we can both protect AND utilize our forest resources. We need good foresters who have the freedom to plan, manage and harvest our forests as needed while protecting the entire resource base. Timber harvesting, wildlife, recreation and watershed management are not mutually exclusive activities. There are good people on both sides of this issue and we need to find solid middle ground not driven by either big business concerns and big environmental concerns. We all need to do our part in protecting the environment. I do mine by building high value, handcrafted log homes. Yes, I use more timber in my homes than the average tract home. The flip side of that is that my houses are extremely energy efficient, they are very green, they are valuable assets, they produce more tax revenue to the counties where they are built AND they use less wood per year than the typical frame house. How is that possible you say? I design and build my homes so that they can last 400-500-600 years. Yes, that is possible. We only need to go to Europeto see this. So I say there are ways to wisely manage our forests and utilize the resources in a way that improves the environment. All it takes is the willingness to work together. I invite you to factor into the equation of your decisions that it is possible to meet the needs of all parties involved. Sincerely, Mark! [IMAGE] Mark Fritch Mark Fritch Log Homes Box1720 Sandy, Oregon 97055 503-668-7130 Office 503-668-3285 Fax 503-849-6316 Cell mfritch@loghomz.com www.loghomz.com - image002.jpg |
| EM-2020 | Steve Garrett <smgmkg@ccountry.net> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/5/2008 5:22:03 | January 5, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely Steve Garrett 1593 Wedgewood Dr Eagle Point, OR 97524-7788 |
| EM-2021 | David O'Connor <dophotos@mac.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/5/2008 6:22:04 | January 5, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely David O'Connor 7622 N Newman Ave Portland, OR 97203-4613 |
| EM-2022 | Roger Gertenrich <gertr@comcast.net> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/5/2008 9:52:02 | January 5, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely Roger Gertenrich 3570 SW River Pkwy Unit 501 Portland, OR 97239-4536 |
| EM-2023 | David Schott <fglc@peak.org> | Western Oregon Plan Revisio1 Attn Ed Shepard | 1/5/2008 10:14:39 | Western Oregon Plan Revision 1/5/08
Comments Topics of comment: 1) Mandates of the O&C Act of 1937 2) Health of our forests 3) Economic health of our counties 4) Global warming 1) Mandate of the O&C Act of 1937: The BLM is required under the Act to apply sustained yield management with the primary purpose of providing for the economic benefit of the counties located within those lands. In so doing, the BLM is to insure that water quality be maintained and that recreation benefits to the population be provided for. Most importantly, in the recent case "National Association of Homebuilders v Defenders of Wildlife (US Supreme Decision June 25, 2007)" the Endangered Species Act Section 7 (a) (2)'s no-jeopardy duty covers "only discretionary agency actions and does not attach to actions..that an agency is required by statute to undertake once certain specific triggering events have occurred. This reading is not only reasonable, inasmuch as it gives effect to ESA'sprovision, but it also comports with the canon against implied repeals [of conflicting legislation] because it stays Section 7 (a)(2)'s mandate where it would override otherwise mandatory statutory duties." In other words if an earlier statute tells an agency to do something, Section 7 (a)(2) does not modify that mandate. In this case, the earlier statute is the O&C Act of 1937. The ESA does not supercedethe mandates of that act. 2) With regard to the alternatives proposed for the WOPR to date, none consider the forest health as an entirety. Fire is the 900 pound gorilla continually hovering in the background and without intricate planning to provide for fire mitigation, this entire WOPR exercise is ultimately futile. The entire O&C land base managed by the BLM need to be managed. None of the alternatives presented for consideration provide for that. Moreover, the forests of Southwest Oregon are so prone to fire, disease and insect infestation, that to manage only a portion of those lands actually subjects all BLM, USFS and private lands in Southern Oregonto a much greater risk of catastrophic loss. This risk is not imagined or blown out of proportion, it is devastatingly real. Not having managed public lands for the last 20 years has dramatically increased the risk of enormous forest loss. By placing 52% off limits or outside the "timber management area" (as in alternative 2) the BLM would be ignoring its duty to protect the entire forest landscape. That is unacceptable. I would strongly urge that your final decision for timber management areas only exclude Riparian Management Areas, Administratively Withdrawn Areas and those lands in the National Conservation System. It is just too important to fight for the health and resiliency of the rest of the forestland. 3) Economic Health: The mandate of the O&C Act of 1937 is to provide primarily for the economic returns to the counties. For many of the counties, especially in the southern end of the state, the monies realized from O&CLandharvesting are critical to county government. Moreover, the jobs created by a healthy forest industry are family wage type jobs. Those same jobs further contribute to county health in that they support other businesses and provide for state and local tax revenues. The importance of a reliable, continuous and much increased supply of federal timber, as opposed to that which we have seen over the last 20 years, cannot be overstated. The infrastructure that remains for the processing of all timber is a tiny fraction of that which existed even 20 years ago. If we lose any more production capacity in Southern Oregonthe ability to process logs through industry will decrease dramatically. There is only one sawmill left in Jackson County, one in Josephine County, one in Curry County, two in Klamath County and one in Lake County. There are 3 or 4 mills that peel logs in Southern Oregon. Without a reliable and increased supply of federal timber, the likelihood is that some of these mills will be gone within two years. Where will the timber go for processing when that happens????? It is imperative that timber be made available in quantities much greater than envisioned in any of the proposed alternatives. I think a target of 175 MM bd. ft. in Southern Oregonis much more reasonable goal. Foresthealth, county receipts and economic viability would all benefit from this harvest target. Note,this would still be well under a sustainable harvest level. 4) The one area of concern that has totally escaped discussion in preliminary studies is that of GLOBAL WARMING. If global warming is linked with increased amounts of carbon in our atmosphere, as a number of scientists believe, then it becomes important to look at the effects of fire on that problem. There are a number of studies that indicate that forest fires are one of the biggest contributors to carbon release into our atmosphere. If Dr. Thomas Bonniksenis correct, for each acre that burned in the Angora fire in and around South Lake Tahoelast summer 60 tons of carbon was released into the atmosphere. Moreover, over the next 20-30 years, an additional 190-200 tons per acre will be release through the decomposition of dead timber (at least if it isn't harvested and the carbon isn't sequestered in the form of manufactured lumber). According to those figures, the initial fire released 186 thousand tons of carbon (fire size was 3100 acres), and over the next 30 o r so years an additional 590 thousand tons of carbon will be released. Even if these figures are twice the actual amount that is an enormous figure for carbon release. Now consider what was released by the Biscuit fire on 2002. In that fire, almost 500,000 acres burned. The carbon release figures are mind numbing. This is an overriding reason why we must consider increasing harvest levels dramatically from present levels, if only to attempt to mitigate the concern of catastrophic fire. We will never catch up through harvesting to reach a level of total forest health. Fire will rear its ugly head. What we can do is to try to mitigate the ability of catastrophic to take hold by thinning in much greater volume in strategic areas. It is possible to work with private landowners and create fire breaks contiguous with their already thinned lands across a much broader landscape than currently occurs. But the only way to make our forests healthier and more resilient is to increase the harvest levels, thin where most expedient to keep fire from spreading, and work with the USFS and private timberland owners in concert to create a much larger vision of what is needed to create a healthy forest landscape. Let's manage all the O&C lands with these goals in mind. David R Schott Exec VP Southern OregonTimber Industries Assn. 1 541 7735329 Fax 7733663 |
| EM-2024 | PAUL SPRIGGS <psfoots@msn.com> | WOPR | 1/5/2008 10:55:22 | I am an OHV user and I also use back country roads for recreation access. Keep roads open! Closing areas is a poor way to manage them. I support all of the Southern Oregon OHV emphasis areas. I do not feel the 13 areas in the preferred alternative number 2 are enough to accommodate existing and future OHV recreation, especially accounting for its popularity and the growth of the area. Loop connectivity between use areas is desirable for recreation purposes. Loop connectivity of OHV trails prevents trail blazing and riding off trail to get to another trail. Looping trails to connect ohv areas would be benificial. Motorized trail use is increasing at a much faster rate than non-motorized, especially in this area. The lack of OHV trails proposed in the WOPR is unacceptable! OHV recreation trails need to be be made to keep OHV on designated trails. What specifically are the criteria for final selection of an area? Comment numbers? Complaint? Funding? The 13 identified emphasis areas include 3 existing designated areas and 10 identified as existing intensely used areas. Ohv use is increasing in popularity . Making more trails and managing areas for OHVs is necessary for OHV control. __Paul Spriggs Address____2950 Foots_Creek Road____Gold Hill ________________________
State ___OR___Zip Code ____97525 541-582-2383 |
| EM-2025 | Reida Kimmel <rkimmel@uoneuro.uoregon.edu> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/5/2008 11:31:51 | Dear BLM,
I am very concerned with the direction the BLM is headed with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes the agency is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. BLM lands in western Oregon contain about 1-million acres of our remaining older forests. The WOPR would increase logging of forests over 200 years sevenfold, and threatens some of Oregon's best remaining ancient forests. Two thousand square miles of forest would be put in "Timber Management Areas," where clearcutting is emphasized. By logging closer to streams the WOPR reduces important protections for clean water and Pacific salmon. High quality drinking water originates on BLM lands for the citizens of Salem, Corvallis, Eugene, and 70 other Oregon communities. Salmon need cool, clean water, but the WOPR would remove stream buffers that shade streams and keep sediment from the water. Please leave the existing protections for riparian areas in place. Wildlife such as elk and black bear and threatened species like the northern spotted owl and the marbled murrelet rely on BLM forests. The WOPR would reduce protections for wildlife populations and diminish habitat for countless plant and wildlife species. Please choose an alternative that leaves habitat protections for wildlife, especially in existing old-growth forests, in place.The remaining old growth forests are not just timber, they are the most diferse forest habitats we have in the Northwest. The species they house, and the complex biological webs within them are the seed banks for the regeneration and preservation of our soil, watersheds and woodlands in the future. No second or third growth forest is as healthy or as rich as the native forest which the BlM promises to reduce once again. When an old growth stand is felled or thinned, changes to the soil, loss of species, however seemingly insignifigant, is irreplaceable. Not only should the BLM's logging alternatives in its WOPR proposals be scrapped, logging of what little old growth remains should be banned. There are many less sensitive and more practical places to generate wood fiber than our last remaining ancient forests, like the millions of acres of young, even-age tree plantations that have grown since previous clearcuts. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - the BLM would provide wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. Instead, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clearcutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clearcut these natural treasures. Reida Kimmel 30306 Fox Hollow Rd. Eugene, OR 97405 |
| EM-2026 | Melissa Yslas <melissayslas@yahoo.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/5/2008 11:35:36 | I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks.
Sincerely, Melissa Yslas 4000 NW Witham Hill Drive #9 Corvallis, OR 97330 Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. |
| EM-2027 | James Berl <fishingyd@aol.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/5/2008 12:02:03 | January 5, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely James Berl 56324 Mckenzie Hwy Mc Kenzie Bridge, OR 97413-9610 |
| EM-2028 | Hedy Lou <hedylou@charter.net> | 'WOPR' COMMENTS | 1/5/2008 12:07:31 | I am commenting to go on the record that I oppose the logging of old growth timber. The value the timber provides is nothing compared to the other values old-growth forests provide. While lumber is a renewable resource, old-growth forests are not. They provide drinking water, wildlife habitat, salmon streams, climate regulation and recreation. They can never be replaced. The thought of further diminishing this very scarce resource seems short sighted indeed.
Louis Sequeira 138 Kanaka Flats Rd. Jacksonville, OR 97530 541 899-6903 |
| EM-2029 | john coleman <johnlcoleman@hotmail.com> | Re: WOPR Revision | 1/5/2008 12:18:32 | Dear Sir and/or Madam,
Regarding the proposed WOPR. I have been following this process for several years and it seems to be predicated on the belief that logging more old growth trees is needed. It's not. There seems to be no way to stop the BLM from increasing logging. The process of "revision" appears to be simply a way of justifying a policy that has already been decided. It's quite clear that this process is driven from the dark bowels of the Bush administration and their misguided desire to reward campaign contributors in the timber industry before they get removed from office. In an attempt to stop the insanity let me once again state...DON'T REVISE THE PLAN AT ALL. Leaving the current plan in place is the only reasonable thing to do given the highly politicized environment at the BLM. In closing, my thanks to the many BLM employees who are trying to do their job according to the best science of the day and a holistic view of how public land should be managed. It's unfortunate they do not set policy for the BLM. Sincerely, John L. Coleman Ph.D. Watch "Cause Effect," a show about real people making a real difference. Learn more |
| EM-2030 | William Vorachek <w_vorachek@msn.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/5/2008 12:22:03 | January 5, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely William Vorachek 16070 Oakdale Rd Dallas, OR 97338-9113 |
| EM-2031 | maggiemead <maggiemead@sbcglobal.net> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/5/2008 12:38:42 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old- growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Maggie Mead 2210A California St. Berkeley, CA 94703 |
| EM-2032 | Chad Derosier *The Chai Guy* <chaiguy@heartsongchai.com> | I adamantly oppose the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions. | 1/5/2008 12:52:09 | January 5, 2008
To the folks at BLM I adamantly oppose the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions. As resident of southwestern Oregon, I frequently visit these wildlands as a place for to enjoy wildlife in a serene and undisturbed setting. I find solace in wilderness away from the hustle and bustle of everyday life and all of the noise that humans create. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. I find that the WOPR is a most heinous forest ?management? plan. Here are several reasons why I oppose the plan: ? The WOPR would increase logging of forests over 200 years sevenfold, and threatens some of Oregon?s best remaining ancient forests. Two thousand square miles of forest (an area the size of Delaware) would be put in ?Timber Management Areas,? where clearcutting is emphasized. ? The BLM cannot eliminate protection for old-growth forests, without undermining the Northwest Forest Plan and protections for threatened and endangered species and clean water. To do so, the BLM needs to violate the Endangered Species and Clean Water Acts and other laws. ? Wildlife rely on BLM forests such as elk and black bear and threatened species like the northern spotted owl and the marbled murrelet. The WOPR would reduce protections for wildlife populations and diminish habitat for countless plant and wildlife species. An increase in noxious, invasive weeds and wildlife species is predicted under the WOPR. ? By logging near streams the WOPR reduces important protections for clean water and Pacific salmon. High quality drinking water originates on BLM lands for the citizens of Salem, Corvallis, Eugene, and 70 other Oregon communities. Salmon need cool, clean water, but the WOPR would remove stream buffers that shade streams and keep sediment from the water. ? The Northwest Forest Plan is a landmark agreement that private, state and federal landowners rely on to protect threatened old growth species while producing timber in compliance with environmental law. Removing BLM forests would unravel the whole fabric of the Plan and produce uncertainty for other landowners. There is a better way. We should protect what is left of Oregon?s old growth heritage forests, and restore those forests that have been degraded. Half of BLM forests were clearcut in the past century and converted to overstocked tree plantations. Thinning small trees could offer more than 2 billion board feet of commercially valuable timber if actively thinned while preserving our last, best public lands for generations to come. It is extremely disappointing and unsettling that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. I strongly urge you to protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. STOP LOGGING OLD-GROWTH I look forward to your comments. Sincerely, Chad M. Derosier cc: Senator Ron Wyden Senator Gordon Smith Rep. Greg Walden (R-2nd) Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-4th) ***************************** Chad M. Derosier The Chai Guy, Vice President Heartsong Herbal Brewing Company 2220 Ashland Street Ashland, OR 97520 (541) 488~5614 (541) 488~5629 fax www.heartsongchai.com ***************************** Raising the vibration of the nation through hydration. The Heartsong Herbal Brewing Company exists to revitalize human body, mind, spirit and community through good brews and good business. ***************************** |
| EM-2033 | Walter Kortge <kortge@charter.net> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/5/2008 12:52:50 | Dear BLM,
WOPR IS A BUSH ADMINISTRATION GIVEAWAY TO THE LOGGING INDUSTRY!! I am very concerned with the direction the BLM is headed with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes the agency is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. BLM lands in western Oregon contain about 1-million acres of our remaining older forests. The WOPR would increase logging of forests over 200 years sevenfold, and threatens some of Oregon's best remaining ancient forests. Two thousand square miles of forest would be put in "Timber Management Areas," where clearcutting is emphasized. By logging closer to streams the WOPR reduces important protections for clean water and Pacific salmon. High quality drinking water originates on BLM lands for the citizens of Salem, Corvallis, Eugene, and 70 other Oregon communities. Salmon need cool, clean water, but the WOPR would remove stream buffers that shade streams and keep sediment from the water. Please leave the existing protections for riparian areas in place. Wildlife such as elk and black bear and threatened species like the northern spotted owl and the marbled murrelet rely on BLM forests. The WOPR would reduce protections for wildlife populations and diminish habitat for countless plant and wildlife species. Please choose an alternative that leaves habitat protections for wildlife, especially in existing old-growth forests, in place. There are many less sensitive and more practical places to generate wood fiber than our last remaining ancient forests, like the millions of acres of young, even-age tree plantations that have grown since previous clearcuts. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - the BLM would provide wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. Instead, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clearcutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clearcut these natural treasures. Walter Kortge 5615 Mill Creek Rd The Dalles., OR 97058 |
| EM-2034 | Anne J. Banks <banksbaby@sbcglobal.net> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/5/2008 13:06:52 | Dear BLM,
I live in Oregon for a variety of reasons, including the old-growth forests, excellent recreation, and opportunities to view wildlife on public lands. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will degrade my ability to enjoy the public lands in western Oregon. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing will unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Some of my concerns include: - I'm disappointed that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. These areas contain unique values that many people seek out to enjoy. These areas should not be opened to logging. - The increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. Over 1,000 miles of new logging road and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. - Clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy - catering to the timber and motorized vehicle industry alone is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. But the WOPR is a step back to the unsustainable days of clear-cutting this amazing resource, endangering wildlife, muddying streams, and fueling public outcry. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. Anne J. Banks 705 New britain Ave. Hartford, CT 06106 |
| EM-2035 | Puckamok <puckamok@yahoo.com> | WOPR comment | 1/5/2008 13:21:43 | The BLM's western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR) needs
to be revised. As a rural Jackson County resident I am opposed to any plan that involves clear-cutting anywhere, removal of any old growth, or weakens protections for watersheds. Our forests are most valuable if we harvest only what we need and we are careful doing it. Some places must be left alone, some must be thinned, some restored, but clear cutting as a part of any plan for a healthy forest is not scientific or moral. It is irresponsible to sell out our forests to the highest bidders at a time when we need our forests to store carbon, cycle and filter the water and hold up hillsides and keep streams cool. Our national forests and BLM lands belong to every one of us. Allowing private companies to profit from the destruction of our forests is a betrayal of the American people. The WOPR seems to ignore scientific research, put aside the desires of most Americans and caters to Big Timber. Please do what you can to oppose this horrific plan. Sincerely, Dana Rose Rogue River, Oregon "A human being is a part of the whole, called by us "Universe," a part limited in time and space. He experiences his self, his thoughts, and feelings, as something separate from the rest-- a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion, to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in it's beauty. Nobody is able to achieve this completely, but the striving for such achievement is in itself part of the liberation and foundation for inner security." --Albert Einstein ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping |
| EM-2036 | Anne J. Banks <banksbaby@sbcglobal.net> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/5/2008 13:34:30 | Dear BLM,
I live in Oregon for a variety of reasons, including the old-growth forests, excellent recreation, and opportunities to view wildlife on public lands. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will degrade my ability to enjoy the public lands in western Oregon. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing will unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Some of my concerns include: - I'm disappointed that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. These areas contain unique values that many people seek out to enjoy. These areas should not be opened to logging. - The increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. Over 1,000 miles of new logging road and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. - Clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy - catering to the timber and motorized vehicle industry alone is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. But the WOPR is a step back to the unsustainable days of clear-cutting this amazing resource, endangering wildlife, muddying streams, and fueling public outcry. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. Anne J. Banks 705 New britain Ave. Hartford, CT 06106 |
| EM-2037 | Brenda Kameenui <my240house@yahoo.com> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/5/2008 13:36:10 | Dear BLM,
I have read many reviews of the new Northwest Forest Plan, and I find no possible reason to follow through with this plan. Please put a halt to it. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will degrade my ability to enjoy the public lands in western Oregon. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing will unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Some of my concerns include: - I'm disappointed that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. - The increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. Over 1,000 miles of new logging road and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. - Clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy - catering to the timber and motorized vehicle industry alone is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. But the WOPR is a step back to the unsustainable days of clear-cutting this amazing resource, endangering wildlife, muddying streams, and fueling public outcry. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. Brenda Kameenui 4003 Dillard Rd. Eugene, OR 97405 |
| EM-2038 | <judykempphoto@sbcglobal.net> | whopper | 1/5/2008 13:59:59 | The new BLM forest management plan is mismanagement. I am angry and incredulous that our goverment proposes clear cutting on federal lands.
There are responsible ways to log forests, but clear cutting any forests especially older forests is just irresponsible and should be criminal! Water pollution, loss of wildlife habitat, visual blight. After all these years of talking about and studying logging practices, this is the best we can come up with? Judy Kemp Property Owner in the Siuslaw Watershed |
| EM-2039 | Richard Spotts <spotts@infowest.com> | My WOPR comments | 1/5/2008 14:01:45 |
January 5, 2008 Bureau of Land Management Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office 333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, OR 97208 RE: My comments on BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM officials: Please accept this letter with my comments on the above-referenced matter. I strongly oppose BLM's proposed management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging roads in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. While BLM claims that the O&C Lands law requires old-growth logging, and therefore limits its management discretion, I believe that this legal interpretation is suspect and self-serving for the Bush Administration that is pushing the timber industry's agenda. The federal Endangered Species Act was passed after the O&C Lands law, as were a number of other modern environmental laws. Under standard conflicts of law court decisions, more recent legal requirements can supersede or at least modify older legal requirements. BLM apparently does not want to acknowledge an arguably more progressive or ecologically enlightened legal position vis-a-vis WOPR because this would undercut its ability to give the timber industry what it wants. This approach is myopic and contrary to the national public interest. For the preceding reasons, please abandon the current proposal. In its place, please develop a proposal that will protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Although I am not an Oregon resident, I am a frequent visitor. I enjoy hiking and wildlife watching on BLM lands in Oregon. Since these BLM lands are owned by all Americans, and my taxes help support BLM management programs, I believe that I am a "stakeholder" to provide WOPR comments. Thank you very much for considering my comments. Sincerely, Richard Spotts 1125 W. Emerald Drive St. George UT 84770 spotts@infowest.com |
| EM-2040 | Kirk Matteson <kirkmatteson@yahoo.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/5/2008 14:02:03 | January 5, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely Kirk N. Matteson 2753 NE Thompson St Portland, OR 97212-4902 |
| EM-2041 | Aleson Macfarlane <alesonm@hotmail.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/5/2008 14:02:06 | January 5, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely Alesn Macfarlane 4603 SE Ivon St Portland, OR 97206-1645 |
| EM-2042 | Colby Hawkinson <colbyhawkinson@hotmail.com> | Public comment from Colby Hawkinson re:Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/5/2008 14:43:08 | Saturday, January 5th, 2008
Bureau of Land Management Western Oregon Plan Revisions PO Box 2965 Portland, OR 97208 Dear Bureau of Land Management, I tried to submit comments via your website on January 10th, but found that was only set up for Oregon residents. I trust that you will consider these comments of mine regarding the Western Oregon Plan Revisions or 'WOPR' process and that you enter them to the public record even though I do not currently live in Oregon. I lived in Corvallis from 1979 until 2001. I grew up hunting blacktail deer and fishing fishing for trout, salmon or steelhead in a number of drainages that are being considered for resource extraction under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions or 'WOPR' process. Since moving to Idaho in 2001 I no longer hunt BLM lands in western Oregon. However, I do still visit them a few times each year to fish as a nonresident for steelhead and salmon and to hike in old growth forests such as the one you administer in Crabtree Valley. I deeply enjoy being able to return to fish and hike those western Oregon BLM areas that are part of my outdoor heritage. I am also glad I can contribute sustainable dollars to local Oregon economies by visiting those BLM lands. I spend considerable money in communities nearest your lands to purchase the gas, food, license and tags, bait and tackle, etc. needed for my trips. I hope you will understand my interest in seeing that the fishing,hiking and solitude opportunities I currently enjoy on your lands are available in the very same quality for my children and for their kids. I appreciate your hard work on this plan but I do not see that you provided an adequate diversity of choices in the draft plan. I would like to have seen more alternatives that retain current protections for fish, wildlife, forests and streams. I urge you to ensure that security habitat areas for elk and deer as well as opportunities for solitude while fishing and hiking are enhanced on your western Oregon lands, not diminished. Finally I urge you to ensure that off-highway vehicles are kept on existing, recognized routes only, and are not allowed to travel cross-country or otherwise damage the fishery resources and opportunities for solitude that keep me coming back to BLM land in western Oregon each year. I thank you for this opportunity to give my comment and for your time spent reviewing it and adding it to the public record as part of the WOPR process. Sincerely, Colby Hawkinson 207 S. Asbury St. Unit B Moscow, ID 83843 _________________________________________________________________ Get the power of Windows + Web with the new Windows Live.http://www.windowslive.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_powerofwindows_012008 |
| EM-2043 | Edward Neal <eneal24@mac.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revision | 1/5/2008 16:26:34 | I am alarmed and concerned about with the Western Oregon Plan
Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. Please stop the destruction of our old growth forests now. This is a travesty. Sincerely, Edward Neal, MD 4201 NE Couch Street Portland, OR 97213 |
| EM-2044 | Troy Lubianski <xzantar@juno.com> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/5/2008 16:55:56 | Dear BLM,
I do not support making old growth forest available to timber companies to chop down. These forests are the quality of life that makes Oregon the beautiful and enjoyable place to live that it is. Please edit the WOPR so that no old growth forests will be cut down. Thank you, troy Lubianski I am very concerned with the direction the BLM is headed with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes the agency is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. BLM lands in western Oregon contain about 1-million acres of our remaining older forests. The WOPR would increase logging of forests over 200 years sevenfold, and threatens some of Oregon's best remaining ancient forests. Two thousand square miles of forest would be put in "Timber Management Areas," where clearcutting is emphasized. By logging closer to streams the WOPR reduces important protections for clean water and Pacific salmon. High quality drinking water originates on BLM lands for the citizens of Salem, Corvallis, Eugene, and 70 other Oregon communities. Salmon need cool, clean water, but the WOPR would remove stream buffers that shade streams and keep sediment from the water. Please leave the existing protections for riparian areas in place. Wildlife such as elk and black bear and threatened species like the northern spotted owl and the marbled murrelet rely on BLM forests. The WOPR would reduce protections for wildlife populations and diminish habitat for countless plant and wildlife species. Please choose an alternative that leaves habitat protections for wildlife, especially in existing old-growth forests, in place. There are many less sensitive and more practical places to generate wood fiber than our last remaining ancient forests, like the millions of acres of young, even-age tree plantations that have grown since previous clearcuts. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - the BLM would provide wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. Instead, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clearcutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clearcut these natural treasures. Troy Lubianski 1305 NE 69th Ave Portland, OR 97213 |
| EM-2045 | Kristi Cowles <kkc@apbb.net> | 1/5/2008 17:03:20 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue, Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Hello BLM, I am horrified, and unfortunately, not surprised, that the Bush Administration is planning to clear cut nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions!!! I just moved from Wisconsin to the Applegate Valley in October and am shocked to find that clear-cutting still exists, not to mention reading about these drastic measures. I do not accept your current proposal and will do everything in my power to help the citizens of Oregon prevent the BLM from destroying our old growth forests!!! This plan must be about corporate money for you to even think of destroying old-growth forests -- your myopic and idiotic, nonsensical proposal strongly suggests that you are living in the dark ages. A short term economic fix, which feeds the giant, corporate logging magnets is obviously going to do nothing except inflame the controversy. I intend to send my letter to all the local newspapers, the Environmental Defense Fund, The Sierra Club, The Native Forest Council, The National Wildlife Federation, American Rivers, the San Francisco newspapers, and my whole address book, which consists of about 200 environmental activists who will make this letter have an exponential effect from across the USA and from Norway to New Zealand. I might remind you that public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, so you are really asking for big trouble with this ridiculous plan. Isn't it time to grow up and realize that our old growth, what's left of it, is precious and should be protected at all costs????? I suggest you look up the definition of the word "integrity" and integrate that meaning into your policies. Sincerely, Kristi Cowles, M.A. 2369 Humbug Creek Road Applegate OR 97530 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation (sent snailmail) Senator Ron Wyden 1220 SW 3rd Ave., Suite 585, Portland, OR 97204 Senator Gordon Smith 121 SW Salmon St., Suite 1250, Portland, OR 97204 Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-4th) 405 East 8th Ave. #2030, Eugene, OR 97401 Rep. Greg Walden (R-2nd) 843 East Main Street, Ste 400, Medford, OR 97504 Rep. Earl Blumenhauer (D-3rd) 729 N.E. Oregon St., Suite 115, Portland, OR 97232 Rep. Darlene Hooley (D-5th) 315 Mission Street SE #101, Salem, Oregon 97302 |
|
| EM-2046 | Ginger Rilling <grilling@mind.net> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/5/2008 17:58:21 | I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcuttingin currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. It is a well-known fact to even a layperson such as myself, thatprotecting the riparian areas along our rivers and streams is essential to the health of the streams and the fish in them. This plan will drastically reduce the protected riparian borders along streams, thus increasing stream temperature, which in turn, will kill the fish.
All the provisions in this plan are harmful to Oregon's forests. It should not be adopted. Sincerely, Ginger Rilling 557 Foss Rd. Talent, OR 97540 |
| EM-2047 | Paul Moss <paul@themailpath.com> | Wild Rogue Additions should be recommended wilderness | 1/5/2008 18:02:01 | January 05, 2008
BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office 333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, OR 97204 Dear BLM Western Oregon Plan Revision, I am writing to urge a reevaluation and expansion of the areas that should be recommended as wilderness in the Western Oregon Plan Revision (WOPR). The Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) preferred alternative recommends only five areas, despite a total of 146 inventoried areas in the lands managed by the plan. The BLM's process for evaluating and determining wilderness resources and wilderness recommendations in the WOPR was inadequate, resulting in many well-known wild places exhibiting excellent wilderness characteristics being improperly omitted. The Wild Rogue Additions is a prime example of an area that clearly meets the criteria for wilderness recommendation, and yet was not recommended. In the Wild Rogue North Watershed Analysis, the BLM itself noted the value of the large, roadless areas for aesthetics, solitude, undeveloped recreational opportunities, wildlife, fisheries, water quality, and the intrinsic value of having wild, undeveloped places (see Version 2.0 of this analysis, issued in December 1999 and available online: http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/medford/plans/files/wild_rogue_north_wa_acc.pdf). Despite these findings, BLM omits the Wild Rogue from its wilderness recommendations. BLM's analysis and recommendations must take into account the economic importance of wilderness as well as the non-commercial values of the public lands it stewards, instead of considering lands primarily for their timber values. This approach demonstrates an unbalanced interpretation of the BLM's legal obligations, and must be reviewed. Additional areas that should be recommended for wilderness protection include Reuben Creek, Williams Creek, Wild Rogue Additions, Whiskey Creek, Wellington Mountain, Clackamas Wilderness � Bull of the Woods/Opal Creek Additions, and Coast Range Wilderness - Wasson Creek. The WOPR is a heavily forested area, and contains rare old growth with trees that stood before our nation existed. Many of these deserving wild lands should be recommended as wilderness to preserve these ancient giants and the beautiful landscapes that surround them. Failure to protect these increasingly endangered wild places from timber harvest is a mistake that cannot be undone once the old growth trees have been cleared. I urge BLM to reexamine its wilderness recommendations in the WOPR, and to expand the recommendations to include the wild places listed above that should be managed to maintain their wilderness characteristics. Sincerely, Paul Moss 1849 Whitaker St. White Bear Lake, MN 55110-3755 USA paul@themailpath.com |
| EM-2048 | Ginger Rilling <grilling@mind.net> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/5/2008 18:14:56 | I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcuttingin currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks.
Sincerely, Dieter Rilling 557 Foss RD Talent OR 97540 |
| EM-2049 | Arthur Coulton <art@apbb.net> | WOPR proposal | 1/5/2008 18:43:25 | How pathetic our government agencies are that BLM will propose the cancellation of the NW Forest Plan by introducing WOPR (whopper) to us. This returns us to the dark ages of logging, as the WOPR will clear cut so much of our ancient forest around us. How are our interests, as residents, protected, when land slides, new roads, off road vehicle use, ruined salmon habitat will no doubt occur. Is BLM charged with the duty to administer and protect our PUBLIC LANDS or are they the puppets of Corporate America? Know that I will not support or vote for anyone in favor of WOPR. or any further degradation of our ancient forest lands
Arthur Coulton 3269 Humbug Creek Road Applegate, Oregon 97530 |
| EM-2050 | Dinda Evans <dindamcp4@yahoo.com> | management plan that will affect 2.5 million acres of public forests in western Oregon, possibly for decades to come. | 1/5/2008 18:57:32 | We must all stop This ¡®Plan Revision¡¯ put out by
BLM. It is, first of all, a lie. It pretends to be some kind of improvement over the Northwest Forest Plan, claiming to have found a way to increase old growth forests (this is very much like wiping out the village to keep the peace), while at the same time upping the cut. In my watershed, the Coquille Basin, the cut will increase fourfold, from 32 mmbf, to 132 mmbf. The North Fork of the Coquille River was designated as a ¡°key watershed¡± under the Northwest Forest Plan because it provided some of the last, best salmon habitat in the Northwest. It is not a coincidence that this watershed was home to some of the largest, oldest forests on the coast. The BLM is now proposing seven times the amount of old growth logging in western Oregon. By some obtuse mathematics and sleight of hand manipulation, the BLM claims that this revision will mean that in the ¡®future¡¯ there will be more forests averaging 200 years old then there is now. Among other lies, this ignores the fact that at 200 years, a forest is just beginning to reach old growth characteristics. The average age of a Douglas fir is 750 years, the maximum is 1200 years (Maser,1990). The biggest lie of all is that there is some kind of legitimate need for this plan. All the faux scientific babble of the 1,600 page so-called EIS does not mention that this entire effort is the result of an out-of-court settlement between the timber industry and the present administration. Political payback. We put you in office, now you can let us cut, cut, cut. Nevermind that deforestation is a major cause of global warming, nevermind that the cleanest, coldest water flows out of old growth, nevermind that up to 200 species of animals depend upon old growth habitat, nevermind that future generations deserve to live in a world that is complete and habitable... So, it is a lie. And it is an attack on the very life support systems that make planet Earth the only home we have. The only wise, sane plan for our forests will include protection of the small, fragmented remnant of the vast old growth forest that once blanketed the Northwest. There is plenty of logging to do in the vast tree plantations that now blanket the Northwest. And there is plenty of employment to be had in the creative, intelligent pursuit of a new type of restoration forestry that may begin to repair ecosystems ruined by 150 years of rapacious overcutting ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping |
| EM-2051 | Arran Thomson <nehara777@naturemail.net> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/5/2008 20:12:02 | January 5, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely Arran E. Thomson 4317 NE 7th Ave Portland, OR 97211-3929 |
| EM-2052 | Norm Young <npyoung@apbb.net> | WOPR | 1/5/2008 21:40:50 | Dear BLM,
I'm writing you with some disappointment today over this WOPR. I've lived in the Applegate since 1987, and witnessed and participated in the "Timber Wars" of the late 80's and early 90's. I was under the mistaken impression that we had already got this subject hashed out in favor of forest-centered biology and a new economy rather than just timber production, but I suppose I shouldn't be surprised considering who is in the White House and their near epic disregard for science when making policy decisions. I've watched with approval as Rich Drehobl and like minded forward-looking BLM forest managers turned us away from clear cuts to thinning and aggressive fire management over the last fifteen years. The results were great; lower fire danger, wood for the mills, healthy forests, and preservation of the beauty of the area that underpins our successful transition from resource extraction to a knowledge and value-added economy. Finally Rich and other like minded policy makers ended the Timber Wars and brought about social peace. But apparently, it was too good to be true. So, at the risk of pointing out the obvious (like last time), stripping all the trees off a living forest is bad science, bad forestry, and bad economics. Let's start with the last first since it's supposedly the driver for this drastic change of course. Annually, timber production adds roughly $4 billion to the GDP of the USA, while recreation, fishing, wildlife, and water catchment on federal lands add $224 billion to GDP. Anecdotally, I think I've met maybe a handful of people that work in the timber business, over the twenty years and hundreds of people I've met as I've lived here, and frankly, none of them depend on clear cuts for their jobs. Furthermore, my job and those of those I employ depend on the beauty of the Applegate. A large part of my customer base are folks that could live anywhere, and they choose Southern Oregonbecause of its natural beauty. So, let's put on our thinking cap before risking the largest part of the economy for 1.7% of the economy. Additionally, that 1.7%, representing the forest industry is hardly suffering without clear cuts, as they have made the transition to smaller diameter and fewer logs on a sustainable basis over the years; else they wouldn't be here now. Let me quote www.rogueimc.com, as they make my points better than I can: "Most land owners in the O&C corridor will lose between $5,000-10,000 in property value. In JosephineCounty, the total loss of property value will be about 300 million, which represents as much as 30 million in lost revenue for real estate agents. For the average land owner, it will take about 70 years of so called O&C tax breaks to recover what will be lost in property value. Tourism jobs will be the hardest hit by the plan. The intense clear-cuts proposed by the WOPR, which the BLM describes as having no standing green vegetation that will create landscapes of distracting visual impacts, destroys the scenery that 50-70 percent of Americans travel to see. Travelers work hard for their vacation time and if a community doesn't provide the experiences these traveler seek, then Oregon can expect 50-70 percent of its travelers will go to communities that provide these experiences, risking the loss of tourism revenues to another state. The loss of scenic landscapes is a disadvantage for Oregoncommunities who spend advertising money to attract and retain spending by travelers. Communities are put into a position of losing revenues worth millions of dollars and these lost revenues place tourist dependent businesses at risk. Lost revenues result in job loss and the potential value of jobs lost from tourism appears to be a straight-across trade for an equal value of jobs created in timber. The WOPR is a strategy of trade-offs, not job gains. The prospect for jobs trade-offs is actually much worse. Timber jobs have experienced a steady decline over the past 20 years due to automation, mechanization, advances in technology, outsourcing to over sea mills, export of timber, and selling of private timber land to land developers. The WOPR projects it will create 3,600 timber jobs but these are unlikely to be sustainable due to automation and other factors. Ironically, the WOPR is actually facilitating a future of timber job loss by converting the forest into plantations that can be managed at all levels of the production cycle by mechanized equipment with one person doing the job of dozens. The biggest concern for future job loss will be triggered by the eradication of forest values that attract small businesses, entrepreneurs, innovators, home-based telecommuters, retirees, and others who make significant contributions to a community's economy and can live anywhere they want. Some authorities point to these jobs as the most promising financial foundation for rural communities in the emerging global economy. These people look for and move to communities that offer a high quality of life and bring with them the skills to create their own employment opportunities or small businesses that support jobs. The WOPR will eradicate the values these people seek and, hence, reduce Oregon's ability to attract an economic sector that represents the future of rural communities in the emerging global economy. Also, I wonder if anyone at BLM has thought to ask the forest industry whether it can process a significant increase timber in light of the sustained downturn in the housing industry and the lack of the capability to process large diameter timber. Maybe you'd just be offering up timber at give away prices in order to get anyone to bid on it---and killing the larger part of our new economy here in Southern Oregon for nothing more than an blind adherence to rigid ideology forced down upon you from the top.the same disease that killed the old Soviet Union. As for the bad science and bad forestry part, I refer you to Wikipedia. Just look up clear cut. There's nothing good about them, drastic reduction in biotic diversity, soil erosion, and dog hair stands just waiting for a fire to wipe them out. Why don't we take clear cut out of our lexicon; it's not good for our community, our economy, our forest.or our BLM. Respectfully, Norm Young Cc: Senator Wyden Senator Smith Representative Walden |
| EM-2053 | Michael Kresko <mjkresko@hotmail.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/6/2008 1:02:05 | January 5, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. I am an angler, a forester by training, and, currently, a middle school educator. I am concerned with the BLM's draft version of the WOPR. The regulation changes do not improve natural resource conditions for our fisheries and will denigrate the fishing experiences of our citizens. I often visit BLM land in western Oregon to recreate but mostly to fish. I teach my students about the importance of wise natural resource management and the current state of our fisheries in Oregon. They look forward to exploring these areas on their own. Buffers near sensitive fish bearing or fish spawning areas should be more than 25 feet. Siltation could smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Also the removal of vegetation along rivers can raise the temperature of streams making them unsuitable for fish to spawn or survive. Additional road building just encourages poaching and the spread of exotic species. Please offer some better alternatives for improving the fisheries and non-motorized recreational opportunities. Sincerely Michael J. Kresko 952 Polk St Eugene, OR 97402-4538 |
| EM-2054 | Dick Artley <DArtley@connectwireless.us> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/6/2008 5:19:32 | January 6, 2006
To: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions public comment representative The Western Oregon Plan Revisions or WOPR are ALL (emphasis added) unacceptable. I recently retired from the Forest Service. The first 14 years of my career was spent in timber. Based on that experience, I know exactly the extent of damage that logging and roading inflicts on any forested ecosystem. The standard excuses for giving away the birthright belonging to my grandchilren's grandchildren to corporate America (community stability, jobs, species conversion,) is being rejected by a larger percentage of Americans each day. During my last years with the Forest Service I was a forest planner, NEPA reviewer and advisor, and the appeals & litigation coordinator with our Regional Office. My knowledge of the system is vast and I use it weekly to appeal atrocities committed by the USFS for timber companies. Not a single acre of the public land that the BLM supposedly "manages" for the American people belongs to the timber industry, yet when a representative from a mill or logging company walks inside one of your District offices and says "jump", you say "how high." This is wrong. Why is this such a difficult concept for a BLM or USFS manager to grasp? I know exactly how the BLM can stay out of court on this issue. Don't be stupid and remember who owns this land and natural resources! Sincerely. Dick Artley Dick Artley 415 NE 2nd Grangeville, Idaho 83530 dartley@connectwireless.us Hardcopies sent to: Senators Ron Wyden and Gordon Smith Reps. Earl Blumenhauer, Darlene Hooley, Peter DeFazio and David Wu |
| EM-2055 | Marcia Fyfe <rollingstove@cox.net> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/6/2008 8:14:54 | Dear BLM,
I lived in Oregon for a variety of reasons, including the old-growth forests, excellent recreation, and opportunities to view wildlife on public lands. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will degrade my ability to enjoy the public lands in western Oregon. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing will unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Some of my concerns include: - I'm disappointed that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. These areas contain unique values that many people seek out to enjoy. These areas should not be opened to logging. - The increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. Over 1,000 miles of new logging road and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. - Clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy - catering to the timber and motorized vehicle industry alone is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. But the WOPR is a step back to the unsustainable days of clear-cutting this amazing resource, endangering wildlife, muddying streams, and fueling public outcry. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. Marcia Fyfe 98 Shore Rd Westerly, RI 02891 |
| EM-2056 | Tamara Rousso <trousso@mac.com> | WOPR | 1/6/2008 8:38:22 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue, Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Tamara Rousso 1212 Hogan Road Applegate, Oregon CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Senator Ron Wyden 1220 SW 3rd Ave., Suite 585, Portland, OR 97204 Senator Gordon Smith 121 SW Salmon St., Suite 1250, Portland, OR 97204 Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-4th) 405 East 8th Ave. #2030, Eugene, OR 97401 Rep. Greg Walden (R-2nd) 843 East Main Street, Ste 400, Medford, OR 97504 Rep. Earl Blumenhauer (D-3rd) 729 N.E. Oregon St., Suite 115, Portland, OR 97232 Rep. Darlene Hooley (D-5th) 315 Mission Street SE #101, Salem, Oregon 97302 |
| EM-2057 | Laura Hisrich <laurarose@jeffnet.org> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/6/2008 10:05:32 | Dear BLM,
If you have ever lived in a non-Western state, maybe you too can appreciate Oregon's special attributes. There are extremely few places left in the WORLD like Oregon. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned about the changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing. The idea of increasing logging of old-growth forest is totally unacceptable. The only changes that should be made to the WOP should be to DECREASE old-growth logging. Global warming is upon us. Ignore it at your peril. Some of my concerns include: - I'm disappointed that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. These areas contain unique values that many people seek out to enjoy. These areas should not be opened to logging. - The increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. Over 1,000 miles of new logging road and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. - Clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy - catering to the timber and motorized vehicle industry alone is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. If you want Oregon to (re)join the ranks of states and countries participating in unsustainable and unhealthy and unfair development, the WPOR is right for you. May you never sleep peacefully again. If you want your grandchildren or anyone to still be living healthy lives in a diverse, beautiful place then oppose the WOPR with all your effort. A good conscious makes a soft pillow. Laura Hisrich 306 High St. Eugene, OR 97401 |
| EM-2058 | David Kenagy <kenagyphoto@yahoo.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/6/2008 11:12:02 | January 6, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. I know you are being told to do this by the Bush administration. Mr. Bush is already a lame duck president. Wait until a new administration and congress is in office to revise this purely political mandate. Oregonians and the nation deserve better. The consequences to biological systems and sportsmen and women are potentially disastrous. You owe it to the land and the citizens to completely revisit this right-wing extremist mandated mess. Sincerely David Kenagy 3253 NW Valley View Dr Albany, OR 97321-9647 |
| EM-2059 | sharon nardello <snardello@hughes.net> | Western Oregon Plan | 1/6/2008 11:20:18 | Dear Sir or Madam:
We are very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased landslide and tree falls during heavy storms. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Furthermore, this solution to the county funding crises will only transfer the current shortfall to our children and grandchildren. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, John and Sharon Nardello |
| EM-2060 | Nils Osterberg <nils.osterberg@yahoo.com> | Please Increase Number of Wilderness Recommendations | 1/6/2008 11:32:01 | January 06, 2008
BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office 333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, OR 97204 Dear BLM Western Oregon Plan Revision, I am writing to urge a reevaluation and expansion of the areas that should be recommended as wilderness in the Western Oregon Plan Revision (WOPR). The Bureau of Land Management�s (BLM) preferred alternative recommends only five areas, despite a total of 146 inventoried areas in the lands managed by the plan. The BLM�s process for evaluating and determining wilderness resources and wilderness recommendations in the WOPR was inadequate, resulting in many well-known wild places exhibiting excellent wilderness characteristics being improperly omitted. The Wild Rogue Additions is a prime example of an area that clearly meets the criteria for wilderness recommendation, and yet was not recommended. In the Wild Rogue North Watershed Analysis, the BLM itself noted the value of the large, roadless areas for aesthetics, solitude, undeveloped recreational opportunities, wildlife, fisheries, water quality, and the intrinsic value of having wild, undeveloped places (see Version 2.0 of this analysis, issued in December 1999 and available online: http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/medford/plans/files/wild_rogue_north_wa_acc.pdf). Despite these findings, BLM omits the Wild Rogue from its wilderness recommendations. BLM�s analysis and recommendations must take into account the economic importance of wilderness as well as the non-commercial values of the public lands it stewards, instead of considering lands primarily for their timber values. This approach demonstrates an unbalanced interpretation of the BLM�s legal obligations, and must be reviewed. Additional areas that should be recommended for wilderness protection include Reuben Creek, Williams Creek, Wild Rogue Additions, Whiskey Creek, Wellington Mountain, Clackamas Wilderness � Bull of the Woods/Opal Creek Additions, and Coast Range Wilderness - Wasson Creek. The WOPR is a heavily forested area, and contains rare old growth with trees that stood before our nation existed. Many of these deserving wild lands should be recommended as wilderness to preserve these ancient giants and the beautiful landscapes that surround them. Failure to protect these increasingly endangered wild places from timber harvest is a mistake that cannot be undone once the old growth trees have been cleared. I urge BLM to reexamine its wilderness recommendations in the WOPR, and to expand the recommendations to include the wild places listed above that should be managed to maintain their wilderness characteristics. Sincerely, Nils Osterberg 30 Chatterton Ave White Plains, NY 10606-1106 USA nils.osterberg@yahoo.com |
| EM-2061 | carsten <carsten@peak.org> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/6/2008 12:59:58 |
I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. We value clean, pure water, hiking on trails through old growth, sustainable logging on a lengthy cycle, consideration of widlife habitats over single-minded profit-taking. Sincerely, Bruce and Diana Carsten Corvallis, OR |
| EM-2062 | patricia mercier <patriciamercier@hotmail.com> | 1/6/2008 13:08:03 | · Dear BLM Decision makers
I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. I have lived in Oregon for almost 40 years, and have watched the steady removal of so many of our old-growth forests. Particularly now that we are more aware of the impact of these actions on the overall health of our planet, I am appalled that this administration is yet again ignoring that impact. The Northwest Forest Plan's protections should remain in place for BLM lands, not sacrificed in an out-of-court deal between the timber industry and the White House. Oregon ancient forests deserve permanent protection and should be managed to maintain important public assets such as clean drinking water, habitat for fish and wildlife, diverse recreation opportunities, stunning scenery, and jobs in forest restoration, fire safety and tourism. Ancient forests in Oregon also serve as an important carbon storage and sequestration resource to help mitigate global warming. The BLM's plans for increased logging in these ancient forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revision will take America backwards in efforts to prevent global climate change. Clearcutting and damage to soils from logging has been shown to release tremendous amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, while old forests absorb and store carbon dioxide. I am concerned that the changes the BLM has proposed in its Western Oregon Plan Revision will lead to the loss of Oregon's irreplaceable ancient forests, water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Much of the BLM forests in western Oregon are adjacent to private landowners who would like to see nearby forest managed to protect their home from wildfire and to preserve their water supply, scenery, and recreation opportunities. Additionally, these forests are owned by Americans across the nation, who would like to see them strongly protected for future generations to enjoy. Please protect western BLM forests and maintain the Northwest Forest Plan reserve system. Please use your power in Congress to rein in the Bush administration and prevent them from spending money to log old growth forests, and stop the BLM from selling off Oregon's ancient forest heritage. Sincerely, Patricia Mercier Pat Mercier 5615 Skyline Rd., S Salem, OR 97306 (503)708-1143 Cell Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista® + Windows LiveT. Start now! |
|
| EM-2063 | Douglas Dorr <dorrs@mac.com> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/6/2008 13:14:21 | I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. I go fishing, hiking and camping in these forests. Once they are gone they will be gone and I will not be able to share this natural resource with my children. Please protect them for Oregonians and not out of state logging companies. Sincerely, Doug Dorr 688 NE Terry Ct Hillsboro, OR 97124 |
| EM-2064 | Lucy Robinson <hodgrob@earthlink.net> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/6/2008 13:24:22 | Dear BLM,
I visit Oregon as a tourist with who plans eventual retirement there. I particularly adimire the old-growth forests, excellent recreation, and opportunities to view wildlife on public lands. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will degrade my ability to enjoy the public lands in western Oregon. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing will unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Some of my concerns include: - I'm disappointed that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. These areas contain unique values that many people seek out to enjoy. These areas should not be opened to logging. - The increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. Over 1,000 miles of new logging road and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. - Clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy - catering to the timber and motorized vehicle industry alone is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. But the WOPR is a step back to the unsustainable days of clear-cutting this amazing resource, endangering wildlife, muddying streams, and fueling public outcry. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. Lucy Robinson 652 Broadway 9th floor New York, NY 10012 |
| EM-2065 | Dennis Svenpladsen <sven@starband.net> | Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/6/2008 13:33:57 | Dear BLM,
I live on the East Fork of the Coquille River. The number of salmon and steelhead that return to the river is decreasing every year. I fear any revision to the 1994 Northwest Forest Plan will lead to their demise entirely. I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clear-cut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Dennis Svenpladsen Myrtle Point, OR 97458 |
| EM-2066 | Carol Valentine <valentine@cavenet.com> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/6/2008 14:35:11 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, As a Selma resident and homeowner, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will illegally remove BLM lands from the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, leading to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy, all of which would negatively affect the quality of life for me, my family, and my heirs. I am alarmed by the proposal's creation of overt 100,000 acres of OHV emphasis areas in Josephine and Jackson counties. While some businesses stand to make money by turning Southern Oregon into a national destination area for off-roaders, the long-term cost in reduced property values, degraded water and soil, impact on wildlife, and a property owner's right to live in the peace and quiet that attracted them to this area, is far too high to justify. The Lake Selmac area, one of the denser residential neighborhoods in Selma, is a particularly bad area for this emphasis, as increased erosion would degrade the quality of lake water which is already prone to toxic algae growth. Air and noise pollution would make the lake an unappealing site for campers, swimmers, and fishermen. The BLM's current proposal to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning would deplete our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. This flies in the face of what most Americans want: thinning of second-growth forests to provide timber, jobs, and a reduced threat of catastrophic wildfire. In light of this, I ask you to reconsider the Natural Selection Alternative. The NSA fulfills the WOPR's "Purpose and Need" (all required laws), whereas the BLM's proposed action alternatives do not. The NSA retains and restores natural forests; it would greatly contribute to the long term economic stability of the communities in the BLM Western Oregon planning areas and achieve permanent forest production. The NSA retains the species, their functions and environments that retain forest ecosystems; BLM proposed alternatives do not. The NSA places forest health first, which lays the foundation for all forest products and uses at a sustainable level, providing community long term economic stability and social health; BLM proposed alternatives do not. Please reject alternatives that would destroy our precious remaining fire-resistant old growth forests, and choose to protect our water, wildlife, economy and serenity for future generations. Sincerely, Carol Valentine 6545 Lakeshore Dr. Selma, Oregon 97538 |
| EM-2067 | Carol Valentine <dwyer@cavenet.com> | official comments | 1/6/2008 14:39:54 | 6545 Lakeshore Drive
Selma, OR 97538 dwyer@cavenet.com 541-597-2839 January 6, 2008 As a Selma homeowner for the last thirty-five years, I am a stakeholder in BLM practices. I therefore must strenuously object to the WOPR as it relates to increased logging and OHV use in my valley, as this will hurt my neighbors and my property values and degrade the quality of life that brought us here. I will cite specifics. 1. Deer Creek runs through my property. I have learned first-hand and from old-timers how this creek once had steady summer flows and sustained large salmon runs, how it became prone to drought and flood due to overlogging of the principally BLM lands upstream, how the salmon disappeared, and most importantly, how this creek has begun to recover since logging upstream was slow in the 90's. Salmon have reappeared and flows are beginning to stabilize. 2. The effect of logging on watersheds is clearly established. A recent residential boom in the Illinois Valley has made freshwater supply become increasingly jeopardized. No amount of short-term logging revenue can compensate for the economic loss possible if new building is curtailed due to a water shortage. 3. Turning the Lake Selmac area into a magnet for OHV use will increase erosion of the slopes above it, further compromising the lake's water quality. Already, the lake is subject to being too warm and stagnant in summer, leading to toxic algae and lake closures. In addition, those in the past who have chosen this park for fishing, swimming, and camping will not enjoy the noise made by heavy OHV use, and many will not return. Was a study of this economic blow made? Degrading this county park while attempting to increase its use by OHV's seems ultimately self-defeating. 4. I have spent six years on the board of the IVCDO (formerly the IVCRT), working to create a better economy for our region. I have learned that the foundation of this region's long-term economic future is its natural beauty and attraction to tourists. OHV drivers could be seen as part of this tourism solution, except that the noise, air, and water pollution they engender will ruin the traditional attractions of our area. 5. One positive local development in the attempt to wed tourism with forestry revenues has been the designation of some BLM forests for Natural Selection forestry. With the recent move of the Siskiyou Field Institute to Selma, this area is poised to be a locus for new ideas in forest stewardship, with numerous opportunities for educational and economic gain. I am asking that you reconsider the NSA, as it is the most sustainable, balanced approach for both forestry and tourist revenues, and it will enhance this valley's new identity. 6. Most of my neighbors and I live here for the clean air and water, the beautiful vistas, and the relative quiet of this rural setting. All of these qualities of life, as well as our property values, will be eroded by the WOPR plan, especially the clear-cutting and the plan to increase OHV use. In sum, the BLM's WOPR plan is bad environmental and economic policy that will hurt both the quality of life and property values of my neighbors and me here in Selma. Please help reverse this ill-conceived plan. Jack Dwyer |
| EM-2068 | Clinton Darling <darlingc@catlin.edu> | Protect the old-growth forests! | 1/6/2008 14:54:01 | Dear BLM,
I live in Oregon for a variety of reasons, including the old-growth forests, excellent recreation, and opportunities to view wildlife on public lands. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will degrade my ability to enjoy the public lands in this wonderful state. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing unravels the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, significantly degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Some of my concerns include: - that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. These areas contain unique values that many people seek out to enjoy. These areas should not be opened to logging. - that over 1,000 miles of new logging roads and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. And that the increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. - that clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy Catering only to the timber and motorized vehicle industries is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. But the WOPR is a step back to the unsustainable days of clear-cutting this amazing resource, endangering wildlife, muddying streams, and fueling public outcry. Clinton Darling 8825 SW Barnes Rd Portalnd, OR 97225 |
| EM-2069 | DORIAN JONES AMELIA R JONES <soundsgood25@msn.com> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/6/2008 15:26:07 |
I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. Sincerely, Dorian Jones 513 Dimick St Oregon City, Oregon 97045 YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS |
| EM-2070 | K1 <jbc-k1@casco.net> | Revisiting the logging issues | 1/6/2008 16:00:39 | Gentlemen: It way past time the general public was informed on just what the mission statement of the BLM really is. And we need to educate the liberal public here in Oregon about the money distribution to inefficient countys. Lets also talk about the county road departments getting the lions share of the harvest money and the county commissioners taking an "administration" fee from these funds. The schools should now get the larger cut of the money not the road departments. Remember all the county roads have been built to access the timber, and remember now that "spotty" rules along with the Murrelett we barely even use these roads anymore, and we should be contracting out to the private sector anyway to reduce this redicuolus PERS liability as far as county road maintenence goes. Lets move on to the bs about clean water regarding log harvest. Can you take me right now to a silted in salmon sponning bed? Can you take me right now to a stream next to a regenerative harvest that I could not take a drink out of? Can you on paper show me how much oxygen a 20 year old plantation of douglas fir trees gives off compared to the same acreage of old growth? Its too bad the original "Hatfield Owl Guarantee Bill" was approved, it has had a detramental affect on reality to school teachers and county officials, they should have been cut off just like us in the industry who were thrown to the side without respect and expected our small businesses to survive in predominatly rural areas where we could not diversify and our employees went down with the ship as well. The folks who are voicing their concerns now over starting up the logging again, which is just the practice of silvaculture and responsible management never talk about the liabilitys in their own back yard, which is usually Portland or Eugene where wastewater treatment plants displace millions of gallons of water daily into waterways that support salmon. This water is superheated in many cases and injected with chlorine. These same folks will not even bitch one bit about Grant Mcombies documentarys on seal and sea lion massive kills on migrating salmon around Bonneville dam and the Caspian Terns killing literally millions of smolts returning to the ocean from the upper reaches of the Columbia river system. The so called concerned citizen will not comment on how after "spotty" was listed their was more logging harvest permits issued than ever before in the history of record keeping at the state dept. of forestry here in Oregon because the price of saw log timber increased three fold. The same liberal will not comment on how Weyerhauser now has a monopoly on the north american lumber market since "spotty" was listed. And the same liberal will bitch about someone using an elephant tusk for a cribbage board but not comment one word when Senator John Edwards builds a 28,000 sq. ft. home or Senator John F. Kerry uses massive quanitys of Brazilain Teak wood for trim on his & Teresa's little 90' yacht., or better yet when Hillary constructs a cedar fence around her house in Chappaquaw. Why is their no outrage in the liberal "end users" of wood? On the other hand I always fear the expansion of government. As a lifelong logger & roadbuilder here in the Siuslaw national forest and the various holdings of BLM land here in Lincoln, Benton, Lane county's I watched in the 1970's & 80's the expansion of more road engineers, more TSO"s and they engineered a road down every ridge to provide jobs for themselves without consideration of breaking up large blocks of pristine habitat. But why can we not clean up the forest? What is the sustained yield of the BLM"s holdings west of the cascades? How much windblown & bugkill timber is laying next to roads ready for relatively easy harvest? Someone better get it right because for an educated society to fear work is proof to many people are working for the government with a guaranteed paycheck and no sence of how a democracy works. This country receives 80% of its tax revenue from small business and the entitlements of government will not last if you kill anymore oppertunity for us in the private sector who operate with no safety net and believe in the constitution and our founding fathers wishes and concerns for starting this country. Quite frankly they would be appalled by the lack of common sence used in making policy decisions in our government agentcys today. I hope the BLM will do its homework and make a coherent argument when it submits another final plan to restart the practice of silvaculture. With respect...Mr. Kelly J. Hockema (541) 563-7607 New Address 135 sw Wakonda Beach Rd. Waldport, Or. 97394 |
| EM-2071 | RCKingsnorth@aol.com | WOPR / OHV comments | 1/6/2008 16:19:56 | OHV activity is among the most environmentally destructive forms of recreation that the BLM and Forest Service must deal with. An OHV rider can travel far more miles in an hour than any hiker, equestrian, or mountain biker, and causes far more damage to the soils, vegetation, and wildlife habitat. When selecting OHV areas, the BLM must recognize the future environmental damage of ever increasing traffic and consider the means to repair, or at least contain, the resulting damage. Adjacent private land must be protected from any negative impact.
The BLM recognizes the incompatibility of OHV use with other forms of recreation (WOPR Chapter 4, page 778), euphemistically saying, "nonmotorized forms of recreation would be dissuaded from using these areas." Dissuaded indeed. The noise of OHVs drives away anyone attempting to enjoy the natural beauty of our public lands. Sharing trails with fast moving OHVs is out of the question. Any area designated as an OHV Emphasis Areas-even a single trail designated for OHV use-will drive out other forms of recreation. Therefore, any area or trail designated for OHVs must be acknowledged as exclusively OHV. While the BLM acknowledges the incompatibility of OHV use with other forms of recreation, it has been slow to acknowledge the incompatibility of OHV use with private homes and private property. The BLM is required by Federal regulation to ensure the "compatibility" of OHV areas and trails "with existing conditions in populated areas, taking account noise and other factors." (Executive Order 11644, Interior Department 43 CFR §8342.1) The WOPR has recognized the "incompatibility" of OHV use with all other forms of non-motorized recreation. Chapter 4, page 776 states, "motorized and nonmotorized activities have limited compatibility." The paragraph continues, "This is especially true when high levels of both types of use are confined to the same area. For example, motorcycle riders and horseback riders using a narrow, single-track trail would likely result in visitor conflicts and safety concerns. Spatial segregation of these activities would reduce encounters, thereby improving the overall experience for visitors. This is also true of areas that are managed specifically for off-highway vehicle opportunities (e.g., designated trail systems and off-highway vehicle emphasis areas), which would also result in fewer visitor conflicts by deemphasizing nonmotorized recreation activities in these areas." As an additional acknowledgement of incompatibility, the WOPR expects hikers and equestrians to be "dissuaded" from using OHV areas and go elsewhere. (WOPR Chapter 4, page 778) "Since off-highway vehicle emphasis areas are specially managed to accommodate motorized recreational activities, visitors seeking nonmotorized forms of recreation would be dissuaded from using these areas." Whereas the WOPR recognizes the incompatibility of OHV use and other forms of recreation, the WOPR fails to address the incompatibility of OHV use and private homes and private property. The noise that "dissuades" hikers and equestrians is the same noise that "dissuades" residents in the area. OHV noise and private homes are not compatible. The checkerboard intermingling of BLM land and private property is an issue throughout the BLM western Oregon lands. Looking at maps of the 13 proposed OHV Emphasis Areas in the Medford District reveals the same checkerboard pattern. The noise from a dirt bike can carry a mile, more in a canyon, less over a ridgeline. With ownership divided into one mile squares, there is very little BLM land that would provide even a half-mile buffer from private land. Over 1600 Johns Peak / Timber Mountain residents and property owners have formally objected to the intrusion of noise, trespass, and property damage caused by OHV use. Residents of the other proposed OHV areas have recognized the same issues and are becoming vocal. They have many stories about the abuse and disrespect of private property shown by OHV riders. Although the majority of riders are law-abiding citizens, there will always be a few bad actors. It only takes one instance of trespass and property damage to destroy the reputations of all OHV riders. Even well intentioned OHV riders may not realize how far their noise carries, and the intrusiveness of that noise to a homeowner. An OHV trail is open 365 days per year. There is no relief for someone living in the area. Any OHV trail should be located so that any OHV noise reaching a private home would be undetectable to the resident. And based on the Executive Order 11644 and 43 CFR §8342.1, any future home must be similarly accommodated. Designating "OHV Emphasis Areas"-even OHV trails-will only draw more OHV activity. Recent publicity statements from the BLM (December WOPR Newsletter #8) claim that "designation as an 'Off-Highway Vehicle Emphasis Area' does not mean this area would necessarily be managed to promote or attract future OHV use." However, such statements conflict with the WOPR itself (Chapter 4, page 778) and defy common sense. "Build it and they will come" does apply. People who live in the proposed OHV Emphasis Areas are protesting existing levels of OHV use. What will the conflicts be as OHV use grows? How many private homes will be degraded or sacrificed for OHV recreation? Bob Kingsnorth Central Point, OR Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year. |
| EM-2072 | RCKingsnorth@aol.com | WOPR - Medford OHV proposal | 1/6/2008 16:46:21 | Regarding Medford District OHV proposals for the Johns Peak area:
Mr. Whittington is quoted as saying, "It won't be a huge 1,000-acre area." (Mail Tribune December 12, 2007 "End of the trails?") The WOPR proposes 16,375 acres for the Johns Peak OHV Emphasis Area (WOPR Chapter 2, Table 53, page 139). So, which is it? 1,000 acres or 16,375 acres? Is not the WOPR the official document? Is Mr. Whittington changing the proposal? If the BLM is really proposing 1,000 acres, why did it put 16,375 acres in the WOPR? Why is Mr. Whittington contradicting the WOPR during the public comment period? Bob Kingsnorth Central Point, OR Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year. |
| EM-2073 | Judith Eisen <eisen@uoneuro.uoregon.edu> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/6/2008 17:02:50 | Dear BLM,
I live in Oregon for a variety of reasons, including the old-growth forests, excellent recreation, and opportunities to view wildlife on public lands. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will degrade my ability to enjoy the public lands in western Oregon. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing will unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Some of my concerns include: - I'm disappointed that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. These areas contain unique values that many people seek out to enjoy. These areas should not be opened to logging. - The increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. Over 1,000 miles of new logging road and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. - Clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy - catering to the timber and motorized vehicle industry alone is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. But the WOPR is a step back to the unsustainable days of clear-cutting this amazing resource, endangering wildlife, muddying streams, and fueling public outcry. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. Judith Eisen 2788 Riverview Eugene, OR 97403 |
| EM-2074 | RCKingsnorth@aol.com | WOPR - OHV | 1/6/2008 17:11:31 | Every employee of BLM who is in any way involved with OHV management, should be aware of and understand the requirements of Executive Order 11644 and Interior Department 43 CFR §8342.1. These documents provide the guidance for designating and managing OHV use under the custody and control of the BLM. The heart of the regulations should be committed to memory:
"The designation of [OHV] areas and trails shall be in accordance with the following: (1) Areas and trails shall be located to minimize damage to soil, watershed, vegetation, or other resources of the public lands. (2) Areas and trails shall be located to minimize harassment of wildlife or significant disruption of wildlife habitats. (3) Areas and trails shall be located to minimize conflicts between off-road vehicle use and other existing or proposed recreational uses of the same or neighboring public lands, and to ensure the compatibility of such uses with existing conditions in populated areas, taking into account noise and other factors. (4) Areas and trails shall not be located in officially designated Wilderness Areas or Primitive Areas. Areas and trails shall be located in areas of the National Park system, Natural Areas, or National Wildlife Refuges and Game Ranges only if the respective agency head determines that off-road vehicle use in such locations will not adversely affect their natural, aesthetic, or scenic values." Considering the residential population around most of the proposed Medford District OHV Emphasis Areas, and the checkerboard intermingling of BLM and private land, a very important phrase should be posted in every room of the BLM offices: "Ensure the compatibility of [OHV] uses with existing conditions in populated areas, taking into account noise and other factors." The WOPR acknowledges the "incompatibility" of OHV and all other uses, therefore OHV use and private homes are also "incompatible". "Noise" is the most pervasive of the impacts on private homes. Trespass and property damage is the most "violating" impact. The BLM must buffer private homes from the pervasive OHV noise, and provide physical protection from the incidence of trespass. Bob Kingsnorth Central Point, OR Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year. |
| EM-2075 | RCKingsnorth@aol.com | WOPR - OHV | 1/6/2008 17:15:18 | When selecting areas for OHV trails and OHV Emphasis Areas, a major issue for adjacent residents and property owners is the trespass and property damage caused by OHV riders.
Some of the trespass is willful disregard of private property, and some is simply ignorance of property boundaries. "Control and management" of the OHV trails and areas is the BLM's solution for these problems. Unfortunately, the practical effect of such "control and management" is wishful thinking. The OHV riders are hidden in the forests, far from any practical oversight or control of an enforcement officer. Although the vast majority of riders are well intentioned, there will always be the few bad actors who ignore or even purposely violate the rules, and then there are those who simply do not know the rules or property boundaries. Instead of issuing meaningless platitudes about how "control and management" will provide the solution, the BLM (and Forest Service) should be exploring more innovative and proactive solutions to control the rogue OHV riders. One approach is to develop and deploy a positive monitoring and control of OHV users, such as developing a monitoring system that uses GPS technology to monitor every OHV. An on-board GPS unit could map every legitimate trail, detect any off-trail transgression, and broadcast its location to local or even satellite receivers. A computerized monitoring system could register every off-trail transgression, and notify on-duty patrol officers. Appropriate fines could be levied against the registered owner of the OHV, even without an officer present. The system could send a "ticket" by mail to the registered owner of the OHV. Likewise, heavy fines could be levied against any vehicle found not to have the necessary GPS equipment, or found to have non-operating equipment. Enforcement of rogue behavior would be real-time and complete. Such equipment would allow enforcement people to immediately locate the bad actors. There would be other benefits to such a system, such as providing the rider with his/her location, maps of the area trails, and features to explore. The system could also monitor and document trail use, and could even support Oregon's effort to monitor gasoline use (or miles traveled) for the calculation of gas tax allocation to the state OHV funds. Although this proposal may sound far-fetched, the technology exists today, and widespread application could drive costs to a practical level. Bob Kingsnorth Central Point, Oregon Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year. |
| EM-2076 | <shelob@presys.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/6/2008 17:27:34 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue, Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Linda Sherwood, RN, BSN POB 1488 Florence, OR 97439 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Senator Ron Wyden 1220 SW 3rd Ave., Suite 585, Portland, OR 97204 Senator Gordon Smith 121 SW Salmon St., Suite 1250, Portland, OR 97204 Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-4th) 405 East 8th Ave. #2030, Eugene, OR 97401 Rep. Greg Walden (R-2nd) 843 East Main Street, Ste 400, Medford, OR 97504 Rep. Earl Blumenhauer (D-3rd) 729 N.E. Oregon St., Suite 115, Portland, OR 97232 Rep. Darlene Hooley (D-5th) 315 Mission Street SE #101, Salem, Oregon 97302 |
| EM-2077 | Vajra Ma <VajraMa@GreatGoddess.org> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/6/2008 17:46:40 | Dear BLM,
I am a native resident of Oregon, returning after living out of the state for three decades. Oregon is an extraordinary place to live and I want to keep it that way. Some of the wonderful aspects of Oregon are the old-growth forests, excellent recreation, and opportunities to view wildlife on public lands. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will degrade my ability to enjoy the public lands in western Oregon, not to mention damage the ecological systems. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing will unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Some of my concerns include: - I'm disappointed that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. These areas contain unique values that many people seek out to enjoy. These areas should not be opened to logging. - The increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. Over 1,000 miles of new logging road and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. - Clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy - catering to the timber and motorized vehicle industry alone is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. But the WOPR is a step back to the unsustainable days of clear-cutting this amazing resource, endangering wildlife, muddying streams, and fueling public outcry. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. Vajra Ma 11 Tara Lane Sunny Valley, OR 97497 |
| EM-2078 | RCKingsnorth@aol.com | WOPR - OHV | 1/6/2008 17:56:16 | OHV noise is a major impact on other users of an area, "dissuading" them from sharing areas designated for OHV use. "Dissuading" other users is a euphemistic way of saying "driving away" other users. OHV noise is also the most pervasive and persistent impact on nearby private homes. The noise travels farther than many users realize. From the perspective of a quiet home, even the lowest level of detectable noise becomes a "Chinese water torture" for the resident.
Any OHV trail should be located to avoid the intrusion of OHV noise at a private home. The acceptable decibel level may need to be "below ambient". "At ambient", the unique character of the OHV noise may be detectable, causing on-going irritation and nuisance to the resident. The Executive Order 11644 and Interior Department 43 CFR §8342.1 requires that trails be located considering "the compatibility of [OHV] uses with existing conditions in populated areas, taking into account noise and other factors." The WOPR has recognized the "incompatibility" of OHV and other users, "dissuading" other users (WOPR Chapter 4, page 778). The same "noise and other factors" makes OHV and private homes "incompatible". The solution is to locate OHV trails far enough away from private property to isolate the private property from OHV noise. Terrain, vegetation, and even weather will influence how the noise travels, and must be accounted for. Another aspect of the noise issue is the allowed noise level of the OHV itself. I have seen published limits of 99 decibels. This is an extremely high level, and should be easily reduced by engineering the exhaust system. (What is the noise level of a Chevy Malibu exhaust system?) The next level of noise reduction can be achieved with battery powered OHV. Battery power also has the benefit of reducing the harmful emissions of internal combustion engines. OHV users claim that noise is beneficial, providing warning to wildlife that an OHV is coming. These groups apparently share the BLM's desire to "dissuade" wildlife from visiting the area. In addition, the OHV groups say that the noise provides warning to other OHV users on the trails. If an OHV rider is "in control of the vehicle", visual contact should be more than adequate. As a member of the Motorcycle Riders Association likes to say, "Less sound, more ground." Bob Kingsnorth Central Point Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year. |
| EM-2079 | RCKingsnorth@aol.com | WOPR - OHV | 1/6/2008 18:01:31 | The Johns Peak / Timber Mountain OHV designation was proposed in the RMP in 1995. Supposedly the plan was to "study" the "proposal".
Since that time, OHV use has increased significantly. The Johns Peak "OHV Site" is promoted in "The Official Guide to OHV Oregon" published by the Oregon State Parks. The Guide was reprinted in 2006, and continues to feature the Johns Peak OHV Site. The Guide is displayed and available at the Medford BLM offices. The Johns Peak site is promoted by numerous web sites: A google search for OHV "Johns Peak" produced 240 hits, a sampling follows: http://atv.prd.state.or.us/site_detail.php?UID=18 Oregon Parks and Recreation Department: ATVs Over 14,000 acres of trails with varying degrees of difficulty. For Class I, II and III vehicles. Jointly maintained by the BLM and the Motorcycle Riders Association. www.oohva.org/ohv%20area%20pages/johnspeak.html Oregon Off-Highway Vehicle Association "Over 14,000 acres open to Class I, II and III ATVs." http://www.atvaonline.com/ride/johnspeak.asp All Terrain Vehicle Association When it comes to ATV recreation in Oregon, it's hard to decide where to start, since the state boasts 24 separate OHV areas that allow ATV use. But you won't go wrong with the Johns Peak/Timber Mountain OHV area, located on the outskirts of Medford, Oregon's third-largest metropolitan area. One of the best reasons to choose this area is 600 miles of trails, some very well maintained, winding through 14,000 acres. https://www.trailsource.com/secure/registration.asp?TYPE=OHV&ID=18387&REFERRER=GOOGLE TrailSource, PO Box 2795 Crested Butte, CO 81224 USA "Johns Peak / Timber Mountain OHV Area in the Medford" http://4wheeldrive.about.com/b/2005/07/28/oregons-600-miles-of-atv-trails.htm About, Inc., A part of The New York Times Company. Medford, Oregon's John's Peak/Timber Mountain OHV Area offers 600 miles of trails winding through 14,000 acres for all-terrain vehicles. It is located just east of Central Point and northwest of Jacksonville. http://www.fordtruckfanatics.com/forum/archive/index.php?t-166.html John's Peak http://wikitravel.org/en/OHV_Riding_in_Oregon Wikitravel - Rogue Valley Motocross Johns Peak Has everything from hard fast trails to slow kid trails. The best part is that it doesnt get muddy during the winter. It is all on sandy loam and the water just sinks through. Making it a relatively clean fun ride during the winter. All this promotion and activity is based on a "proposal to study". What will the activity be like if the area is actually designated an OHV Emphasis Area? Is it a surprise that the residents of Johns Peak / Timber Mountain are concerned about the impact of an OHV designation in their neighborhoods? If the BLM cannot even get the "Johns Peak BLM OHV Site" removed from an Oregon Parks Department guide, what control will the BLM have over the Johns Peak area? Or is the BLM willingly promoting the area before it has completed an EIS? Bob Kingsnorth Central Point, Oregon Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year. |
| EM-2080 | Eric Wiser <emwiser@earthlink.net> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/6/2008 18:12:02 | January 6, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Salmon and Steelhead runs are so iprotant to the ecosystem. Please leave the larger buffer outside the streams. Plus it will help control local flooding. Sincerely Eric Wiser 1367 Dawn Dr Stayton, OR 97383-1320 |
| EM-2081 | Phil Schnabel <PhilSchnabel@comcast.net> | WOPR Whopper | 1/6/2008 18:18:05 | 5259 Olympic Circle
Eugene, OR 97402 email: PhilSchnabel@comcast.net January 7, 2008 Dear BLM Re: The whopper, WOPR. Corporations have done a lot of good. Almost always, however, the good they do is associated directly with PR & the bottom line. My career in the wood products industry started in 1940 when I worked as a "Brush Piler" for PFI near Lewiston Idaho. At that time, Weyerhaeuser owned PFI & widely advertised the Lewiston sawmill as the "Largest White Pine Mill In The World." They had huge log drives every year bringing log rafts down the Clearwater River to the mill pond. Where is all the White Pine now? Where are all the trees now. Where are Weyerhaeuser's "Trees Forever". What percentage of old growth has already been cut? Who does clear-cutting benefit? After receiving my engineering degree, & during my 33 years of supervisory & management responsibilities with: Weyerhaeuser (PFI), Crown Zellerbach, American Can Company, Pope & Talbot, & James River (later Georgia Pacific) I was close enough to the top to know when they had to choose between profits or doing the best thing for environment, wildlife, & future generations - the environment, wildlife, & future generations lost every time. They did do a lot of Public Relations advertising about the great things they were doing for the environment, wildlife, & future generations (but things they were required to do by law anyway). I'm urging you to please save our forests, watersheds, & the wildlife which depends on the meager remaining forests for survival. Permit NO old growth cutting - & NO clear cutting. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to recognize that clear cutting & old growth cutting (regardless of the 70+ years of false propaganda we've all been subjected to) benefit only the timber companies & landowners whose trees are cut. Don't be taken in. Sincerely, Phil Schnabel |
| EM-2082 | Lloyd A. Geraths <l_g_geraths@hotmail.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/6/2008 18:32:02 | January 6, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Most of the above statement BS. I personally know some of the authors and their integrity and knowledge of resource management is beyond reproach. Once again TU is feeding the public half truths and doomsday fears. That is one of the reasons I dropped my membership in that group. Sincerely Lloyd A Geraths 2347 NW Marken St Bend, OR 97701-8638 |
| EM-2083 | barb giudici <barbgiudici@yahoo.com> | OHVs | 1/6/2008 19:39:51 | I live 1 mile outside Jacksonville, OR, where the BLM
is considering a large OHV park. Other sites where OHVs have been driven are scarred with deep ruts causing disasterous runoff, total defacing of the area, and litter scattered unresponsibly. There is no question that the noise would pollute this part of the Rogue Valley. WHY would the BLM consider buying land to create a destructive "park"??? There is total negative effect on the citizens who live here! I ask for a veto on buying land for the Jacksonville OHV park. Barbara Giudici 3724 Walker Creek Rd. Central Point, OR 97502 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping |
| EM-2084 | Anne Banks <earthborngarden@gmail.com> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/6/2008 19:48:09 | Dear BLM,
I am very concerned with the direction the BLM is headed with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes the agency is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. We needto protect the old growth trees. They represent an important biomass that needs preserving. Don't just go for the short term gain. There is more at stake, here BLM lands in western Oregon contain about 1-million acres of our remaining older forests. The WOPR would increase logging of forests over 200 years sevenfold, and threatens some of Oregon's best remaining ancient forests. Two thousand square miles of forest would be put in "Timber Management Areas," where clearcutting is emphasized. By logging closer to streams the WOPR reduces important protections for clean water and Pacific salmon. High quality drinking water originates on BLM lands for the citizens of Salem, Corvallis, Eugene, and 70 other Oregon communities. Salmon need cool, clean water, but the WOPR would remove stream buffers that shade streams and keep sediment from the water. Please leave the existing protections for riparian areas in place. Wildlife such as elk and black bear and threatened species like the northern spotted owl and the marbled murrelet rely on BLM forests. The WOPR would reduce protections for wildlife populations and diminish habitat for countless plant and wildlife species. Please choose an alternative that leaves habitat protections for wildlife, especially in existing old-growth forests, in place. There are many less sensitive and more practical places to generate wood fiber than our last remaining ancient forests, like the millions of acres of young, even-age tree plantations that have grown since previous clearcuts. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - the BLM would provide wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. Instead, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clearcutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clearcut these natural treasures. Anne Banks 278 Mitchell St. Hillsdale, NY 12529 |
| EM-2085 | barb giudici <barbgiudici@yahoo.com> | old growth forests in Oregon | 1/6/2008 19:51:39 | I am writing to request that the BLM reconsider
allowing the cutting of old growth forests for timber. They beautify our state, and cannot be replaced in our lifetime, or that or our grandchildren. Where is the responsible forethinking in such a decision? My understanding of the BLM is that it stands for the "preservation of the beauty of our lands, as well as use of its resources". Barbara Giudici 3724 Walker Creek Rd. Central Point, OR 97502 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping |
| EM-2086 | Jim & Mona Bronson <jimona22@comcast.net> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/6/2008 19:56:06 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM administrators: Since public commentary on the pending Western Oregon Plan Revision has been invited through 1/11/08, I submit the following for your consideration. As an Oregon resident for the past 24 years, I've enjoyed many recreational uses of Western Oregon's diverse, forested areas and am deeply concerned about the potential damage to these ecosystems for the sake of increased industrial timber consumption. Healthy, protected forests are one of Oregon's most important natural assets. Old growth clearcutting promises only a short-term economic boom for the few, while an economic bust is easily foreseeable under this plan as fish, wildlife, and the old growth forests that they rely on dwindle. I am therefore strongly in favor of the BLM taking NO ACTION in revising the Northwest Forest plan, and am opposed to the BLM's preference for Alternative 2 of the plan. Alternative 2 would take many forested areas of outstanding natural value out of Late Successional Reserve and move them to Timber Management Areas for clearcutting. However, by removing large areas of mature and old growth forests which store significant amounts of carbon, Alternative 2 would contribute to global warming as would the aggressive clearcuts planned in this Alternative. Since greater oxidation of the forest floor occurs following clearcuts, climate concerns are involved. Also, scientific research has shown that cut-over areas recover much better with the protection of green standing trees, snags, decomposing downed trees, etc. Alternative 2 would also support salvage logging even in Late Successional forests, which is bad science and an invitation to arsonists. These and other carbon problems have not been addressed in the BLM's Draft Environmental Impact Statement. This represents a serious scientific flaw. This Alternative would also greatly shrink riparian buffers, which protect streams and rivers and provide "dispersal habitat" for many species, and would thereby reduce habitat for salmon, spotted owls, marbled murrelets, and other wildlife. I urge the Bureau of Land Management to stay with the Northwest Forest Plan/No Action Alternative, which was painstakingly worked out as a compromise among many parts of our community and is based on sound science. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Mona Bronson 2435 Van Buren Street Eugene, OR 97405 |
| EM-2087 | Sally Palmer <palmerlavinduo@gmail.com> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/6/2008 20:17:02 | Dear BLM,
As a life-long Oregon resident, I have witnessed many people, organizations, and universities working for years trying to balance logging interests with forest protection interests. With endless hours of time, love, care and money, so many people have been trying to work out these delicate compromises for salmon recovery, stream and river health, rare plant and animal protection, and for all the many other wonderful and necessary things old growth forests bring to us. There is so much at stake. Cutting these biggest trees in these most intact and natural forests takes away some of the last of what we are hanging onto by a thread. It takes away Oregon! It takes away the best of what this state stands for and the spirit of the place that draws people to come here and to stay and be happy here. Losing more natural forests before we understand the depths of the impact of this loss on Oregon, could be a bigger disaster ecomically and environmentally then we even already know it is. As more is lost it becomes too late even to learn the extent of the damage to all of us. It is simply not in the best interests of the state on any level to tear us all apart again with new gut wrenching debate, for a false sense of temporary economic gain instead of real, long term sustainable economy building. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. Sally Palmer 2763 Potter Alley Eugene, OR 97405 |
| EM-2088 | seafauna2@earthlink.net <seafauna2@earthlink.net> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/6/2008 20:23:31 | I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. Sincerely, Fauna-June and Frank Fauth, 21690 E.BeavercreekRd., Cloverdale, Or. 97112-9493
seafauna2@earthlink.net EarthLink Revolves Around You. |
| EM-2089 | Ron Patton <patton_news@msn.com> | BLM's WOPR proposal | 1/6/2008 20:47:36 | The BLM's WOPR proposal is completely unacceptable in every respect. Absolutely NO to a seven-fold increase in old-growth clear-cutting beginning with 58,000 acres of old-growth clear-cut in the first ten years. Absolutely NO to fewer, smaller old-growth reserves making those reserves 48% smaller than the minimum needed for legal compliance and recovery of threatened species. Absolutely NO to dramatically reducing stream buffers by 75%. Absolutely NO to Degrading our water quality, where more clear-cutting and roads will only make it harder to fix the already 600 miles of polluted streams on BLM land. Absolutely NO to all clear-cutting of Oregon's National Forest and creating a situation where Owl nest stands are left unprotected. Absolutely NO to creating a 40% reduction in marbled murrelet nesting habitat and spotted owl dispersal habitat. Absolutely NO to transforming fire-resilient old forests into dense young forests that are prone to high severity fire. And absolutely NO to continuing to advance a corporate agenda based on incompetent, environmentally, and socially destructive practices orchestrated by the Bush administration. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes.
Sincerely, Ronald and Sandra Patton 2216 15th Street Springfield, OR 97477 |
| EM-2090 | Kevin Bruner <sfkrb32@hotmail.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/6/2008 21:12:02 | January 6, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely Kevin Bruner 2306 NE Couch St Portland, OR 97232-3121 |
| EM-2091 | Dave & Joanne <forsduo@presys.com> | Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/6/2008 22:36:52 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue, Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, David and Joanne Forsberg CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Senator Ron Wyden 1220 SW 3rd Ave., Suite 585, Portland, OR 97204 Senator Gordon Smith 121 SW Salmon St., Suite 1250, Portland, OR 97204 Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-4th) 405 East 8th Ave. #2030, Eugene, OR 97401 |
| EM-2092 | Benjamin House <bjammmin@yahoo.co.uk> | Scrap the WOPR | 1/6/2008 22:59:00 | Dear BLM,
I live in Eugene, Oregon. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will destroy irreplaceable old growth forest habitat in western Oregon. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing will unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, degraded wildlife and salmon habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. The problems with this plan (WOPR) are too many to list. It all adds up to an environmental catastrophy. BLM needs to go back to the drawing board. They need to remember that there is no replacing the Ancient Trees once they are gone. Benjamin House 1380 jefferson st. Eugene, OR 97402 |
| EM-2093 | Chris Cox <chris240b@netzero.com> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/6/2008 23:00:51 |
I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. I'm currently a biology student specializing in forest ecology and I can tell you that every educated person in the field of ecology is very concerned about how this will effect us for the next few hundred years. Remember, those replanted trees will not become old-growth until your great, great, great, great, great, great grandchildren will be retiring! Very concerned citizen, Chris Cox 13589 SW Electric ST Beaverton, OR 97005 |
| EM-2094 | David Jaffe <david-jaffe@comcast.net> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/6/2008 23:02:01 | January 6, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. Sincerely David Jaffe 2224 SE 170th Ave Portland, OR 97233-4122 |
| EM-2095 | will roddingsoma <grannyfartpudding@yahoo.com> | Please preserve ALL old growth forest | 1/7/2008 3:32:47 | I hope all of you at the BLM get a chance to visit an
pacific NW virgin old growth forest and get an understanding of the complex subtle systems that make these powerful fragmented ecosystems so precious. One that contradicks the current offical "facts" rooted in the twisted logic of capitalist foresters teamed up with the timber industry. I do not belive you when you say you will plant 100,000 trees where a grove of 100-1100 year old trees stood a decade before and say an old growth forest with the rich biodivirsity and health will arise from those saplings. Just the fungi present in a PNW old growth douglas fir forest is amazing in its interwoven bond with the canopy above. There is much more than fungi present there so I plead with honest sorrow for our mother earth and all she has endured under man's rule and ask you the people ruling these lands under our current society, for the ancient forests will outlive the greatest of empires if we let them, to protect what little of the virgin forest there is left and to come out publicly and proffessionally against all logging of rich diverse forest for any reason. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs |
| EM-2096 | Aaron Aasen <aaronaasen@hamptonaffiliates.com> | BLM Western Oregon Plan Revision | 1/7/2008 7:23:24 | Aaron Aasen
1904 7th Street Tillamook, OR 97141-3801 January 7, 2008 Edward Shepard OR/WA State Director Bureau of Land Management PO Box 2965 Portland, OR 97208 Dear Edward Shepard: Please accept the following comments on the BLM's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Revision of the Resource Management Plans for Western Oregon. None of the three alternatives presented in the DEIS meet the requirements of the O&C Act because they do not manage the land for the dominant use of timber production. Reserving the majority (52%) of the suitable timberlands for the purpose of a listed species is contrary to the O&C Act. The BLM must develop and analyzes at least one alternative that maximizes the amount of land in timber production and receipts to local county governments, and meets its no jeopardy obligation. Congress and the Administration must ensure that when the Plan is finalized that the BLM receives adequate funding so that it can be fully implemented. When implemented, the Plan should live up to the full commitment that was made to local counties. Timber sale revenues must generate at least an amount equal to the funding that was provided to local counties through the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act on a yearly basis. It is the obligation of the BLM to manage these timberlands to maximize timber production while at the same time provide suitable habitat for wildlife and fish species as set forth in the O&C Act. Increasing timber sale revenues will generate much needed dollars for county programs throughout the state while at the same time provide desperately needed jobs in rural communities throughout Western Oregon. In summary, the economic viability of our rural communities and the overall health of our federal forests are of vital importance to me. I ask that you give these comments full consideration as you prepare the final Environmental Impact Statement and select the final management plans for the Western Oregon BLM Districts. Sincerely, Aaron Aasen (503) 842-8519 |
| EM-2097 | Kris McCall <krismccall@hamptonaffiliates.com> | BLM Western Oregon Plan Revision | 1/7/2008 7:37:57 | Kris McCall
1616 North 18th Street Suite 108 Mount Vernon, WA 98273-2600 January 7, 2008 Edward Shepard OR/WA State Director Bureau of Land Management PO Box 2965 Portland, OR 97208 Dear Edward Shepard: Please accept the following comments on the BLM's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Revision of the Resource Management Plans for Western Oregon. None of the three alternatives presented in the DEIS meet the requirements of the O&C Act because they do not manage the land for the dominant use of timber production. Reserving the majority (52%) of the suitable timberlands for the purpose of a listed species is contrary to the O&C Act. Because of the unique nature of the O&C Lands, by law these lands are not available to be part of a reserve system designed to recover a listed species. The BLM should consider active management for the protection of listed and sensitive species and their habitat before adopting passive, reserve strategies. The alternative selected by the BLM, however, should be one that will not jeopardize the continued existence of listed species within the species entire habitat range. The BLM must develop and analyzes at least one alternative that maximizes the amount of land in timber production and receipts to local county governments, and meets its no jeopardy obligation. Congress and the Administration must ensure that when the Plan is finalized that the BLM receives adequate funding so that it can be fully implemented. Congress and the Administration must ensure that when the Plan is finalized that the BLM receives adequate funding so that it can be fully implemented. When implemented, the Plan should live up to the full commitment that was made to local counties. Timber sale revenues must generate at least an amount equal to the funding that was provided to local counties through the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act on a yearly basis. All BLM administered land should be managed to minimize the threat of catastrophic wildfire on these lands and surrounding state and private lands. Access should be maintained through BLM administered lands for private land access, fire suppression, as well as recreational uses, such as hunting, fishing, boating and sightseeing. In summary, the economic viability of our rural communities and the overall health of our federal forests are of vital importance to me. I ask that you give these comments full consideration as you prepare the final Environmental Impact Statement and select the final management plans for the Western Oregon BLM Districts. Sincerely, Kris McCall (360) 848-0404 |
| EM-2098 | Frank Sprouse <fsprouse@sps.lane.edu> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/7/2008 8:17:09 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Frank Sprouse 598 Brookside Dr. Eugene, OR Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT 19 |
| EM-2099 | Xan Augerot <xan_augerot@yahoo.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/7/2008 9:42:03 | January 7, 2008
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear Western Oregon Plan Revisions, As a sportsman in western Oregon, I am deeply concerned with the Bureau of Land Management's recently released draft version of the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The plans outlined in the document would dramatically alter public lands management in western Oregon to the detriment of fish and wildlife and, by extension, hunting and fishing. I frequently visit Bureau of Land Management land in western Oregon, and I'm worried the BLM's plan would have a significant impact on my ability to hunt and fish in this region, and, more importantly, my ability to pass down my sporting heritage to the next generation of hunters and anglers in western Oregon. For example, reduction of streamside buffers to 25 feet would most certainly have a negative impact on our trout and salmon fisheries throughout the region. Timber harvest in close vicinity to fish-bearing or fish-spawning waters will contribute sediment to the systems, with the potential to smother fish eggs and spawning gravel. Additionally, removing streamside vegetation will reduce cover and likely result in temperature increases that could prove fatal to our fisheries. What's more, plans to construct about 1,000 miles of new roads over the next decade, and to allow 14,000 acres of clearcut logging annually could have drastic impacts on the region's struggling, but recovering, fisheries. Add in the conversion of our low-elevation oak savanna forests to conifer plantations and the creation of new off-highway-vehicle emphasis areas, and the plan becomes detrimental to our big-game herds and upland game bird populations. In short, the Western Oregon Plan Revisions are unacceptable from a hunting and angling standpoint. Ideally, the BLM would offer a full range of alternatives when it comes to the plan revisions, with all of those alternatives providing some measure of fish and wildlife protection. Finally, off-highway vehicle management should not be addressed at the region-wide level, but rather by individual BLM districts, and with a generous opportunity for public comment at the local level. All of the BLM options seem to be solutions to the wrong problem. The real issues are county finances and forest health, not subsidizing timber company operations. These measures seem designed mostly to support the latter. At a time of low timber demand and falling prices, I believe the BLM should be working with other Coast Range land owners to experiment with more creative landscape scale timber management that will foster long-term fish and wildlife productivity, recreation, and timber values. Sincerely Xan Augerot 1615 SE Bethel St Corvallis, OR 97333-1251 |
| EM-2100 | Kirsten A Flynn <kir@declan.com> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/7/2008 9:43:59 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will undo the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. We need to preserve our remaining old growth forests and log in second growth lands. These forests are the "lungs" of the western states and play an important role in sequestering carbon to prevent global warming Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry . Sincerely, Kirsten A Flynn Sustainable Home www.sustainablehome.com 471 Matadero Ave Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-855-9476 |
| EM-2101 | Clare Miflin <c.miflin@kisscathcart.com> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/7/2008 9:59:00 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Clare Miflin Kiss + Cathcart, Architects 44 Court Street, Tower C Brooklyn, NY 11201 Tel 718 237 2786 Fax 718 237 2025 www.kisscathcart.com |
| EM-2102 | Joseph Gregory <je_gregory@comcast.net> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/7/2008 10:00:28 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old- growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Joseph E Gregory 9587 Nittany Drive #304 Manassas, VA 20110 |
| EM-2103 | cyril waterjuice <cyril.waterjuice@gmail.com> | forests | 1/7/2008 10:00:53 | To Whom it May Concern,
Please make every effort to preserve our remaining forests, While it might seem that logging will benefit many people, the truth is that in the long run it will harm many more. We are at a point in our history as humans that we need to start finding alternative ways to solving things and to stop taking things for granted as if they are of endless supply, Its already catching up to us. please save the forests. Cyril Kollock |
| EM-2104 | shazna jai <shaznajai@gmail.com> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/7/2008 10:13:00 | Dear BLM,
I am very concerned with the direction the BLM is headed with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes the agency is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. BLM lands in western Oregon contain about 1-million acres of our remaining older forests. The WOPR would increase logging of forests over 200 years sevenfold, and threatens some of Oregon's best remaining ancient forests. Two thousand square miles of forest would be put in "Timber Management Areas," where clearcutting is emphasized. By logging closer to streams the WOPR reduces important protections for clean water and Pacific salmon. High quality drinking water originates on BLM lands for the citizens of Salem, Corvallis, Eugene, and 70 other Oregon communities. Salmon need cool, clean water, but the WOPR would remove stream buffers that shade streams and keep sediment from the water. Please leave the existing protections for riparian areas in place. Wildlife such as elk and black bear and threatened species like the northern spotted owl and the marbled murrelet rely on BLM forests. The WOPR would reduce protections for wildlife populations and diminish habitat for countless plant and wildlife species. Please choose an alternative that leaves habitat protections for wildlife, especially in existing old-growth forests, in place. There are many less sensitive and more practical places to generate wood fiber than our last remaining ancient forests, like the millions of acres of young, even-age tree plantations that have grown since previous clearcuts. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - the BLM would provide wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. Instead, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clearcutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clearcut these natural treasures. shazna jai 262 Grant ST #A Ashland, Or, OR 97502 |
| EM-2105 | Forwarded by alan_hoffmeister@blm.gov | Fw: WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Question Only | 1/7/2008 10:19:05 | ----- Forwarded by Alan Hoffmeister/ORSO/OR/BLM/DOI on 01/07/2008 10:18 AM -----
chaiguy@heartsongchai.com 01/05/2008 12:48 PM To orsowopr@blm.gov cc Subject WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Question Only Requestor: Chad M. Derosier Street: 952 B Street #3 Location: Ashland, OR 97520 E-mail address: chaiguy@heartsongchai.com Comments/Question: January 5, 2008To the folks at BLMI adamantly oppose the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions. As resident of southwestern Oregon, I frequently visit these wildlands as a place for to enjoy wildlife in a serene and undisturbed setting. I find solace in wilderness away from the hustle and bustle of everyday life and all of the noise that humans create.The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests pl ay in regulating the climate.I find that the WOPR is a most heinous forest "management" plan. Here are several reasons why I oppose the plan:. The WOPR would increase logging of forests over 200 years sevenfold, and threatens some of Oregon's best remaining ancient forests. Two thousand square miles of forest an area the size of Delaware would be put in "Timber Management Areas," where clearcutting is emphasized.. The BLM cannot eliminate protection for old-growth forests, without undermining the Northwest Forest Plan and protections for threatened and endangered species and clean water. To do so, the BLM needs to violate the Endangered Species and Clean Water Acts and other laws.. Wildlife rely on BLM forests such as elk and black bear and threatened species like the northern spotted owl and the marbled murrelet. The WOPR would reduce protections for wildlife populations and diminish habitat for countless plant and wildlife species. An increase in noxious, invasive weeds an d wildlife species is predicted under the WOPR.. By logging near streams the WOPR reduces important protections for clean water and Pacific salmon. High quality drinking water originates on BLM lands for the citizens of Salem, Corvallis, Eugene, and 70 other Oregon communities. Salmon need cool, clean water, but the WOPR would remove stream buffers that shade streams and keep sediment from the water.. The Northwest Forest Plan is a landmark agreement that private, state and federal landowners rely on to protect threatened old growth species while producing timber in compliance with environmental law. Removing BLM forests would unravel the whole fabric of the Plan and produce uncertainty for other landowners.There is a better way. We should protect what is left of Oregon's old growth heritage forests, and restore those forests that have been degraded. Half of BLM forests were clearcut in the past century and converted to overstocked tree plantations. Thinning small trees cou ld offer more than 2 billion board feet of commercially valuable timber if actively thinned while preserving our last, best public lands for generations to come.It is extremely disappointing and unsettling that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms.I strongly urge you to protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes.STOP LOGGING OLD-GROWTHI look forward to your comments.Sincerely,Chad M. Derosier |
| EM-2106 | Forwarded by alan_hoffmeister@blm.gov | Fw: WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Electronic Copy Request | 1/7/2008 10:23:29 | ----- Forwarded by Alan Hoffmeister/ORSO/OR/BLM/DOI on 01/07/2008 10:23 AM -----
eaeriel@yahoo.com 01/06/2008 09:53 PM To orsowopr@blm.gov cc Subject WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Electronic Copy Request Requestor: Ethan Matthews Street: 82750 Bradford RD SO Location: Creswell, OR 97426 E-mail address: eaeriel@yahoo.com Requested Item: Electronic Draft EIS Comments/Question: Hello,I writing on behalf of myself and others at my workplace that have notified me of the plan to to log a possible 2mil+ acres of land in Oregon. I am opposed to this redesignation of land use laws, have already seen the damage it caused many years ago, and even beyond the Spotted Owl issue see the negative impacts on the broader environment via logging and other destructive forms of enterprise. I also recognize that such law revisions should be voted on by the people who are most affected by it- Those residents of Oregon and those in the logging communities. It should not, as a matter of \democracy\ be decided in unpublicized committee until finding out about this from a very imformed co-worker, I knew nothing about a deadline for public discourse.Thank for you for your time in reading my reply to WOPR. I hope my coments are understood and taken in good faith. I am requesting a draft below as I want to read the whole thing myself. Thanks again for your time,Ethan Matthews |
| EM-2107 | Forwarded by alan_hoffmeister@blm.gov | Fw: WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Electronic Copy Request | 1/7/2008 10:23:53 | ----- Forwarded by Alan Hoffmeister/ORSO/OR/BLM/DOI on 01/07/2008 10:23 AM -----
chrisconcilla@mindspring.com 01/06/2008 10:22 PM To orsowopr@blm.gov cc Subject WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Electronic Copy Request Requestor: chris concilla Street: 34518 highway 58 Location: eugene, OR 97405 E-mail address: chrisconcilla@mindspring.com Requested Item: Electronic Draft EIS Comments/Question: Do Not! Increase the logging of old growth forests in Oregon!!! Chris Concilla |
| EM-2108 | Forwarded by alan_hoffmeister@blm.gov | Fw: WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Question Only | 1/7/2008 10:24:56 | ----- Forwarded by Alan Hoffmeister/ORSO/OR/BLM/DOI on 01/07/2008 10:24 AM -----
swheeler@c-cor.com 01/07/2008 09:29 AM To orsowopr@blm.gov cc Subject WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Question Only Requestor: Steven B. Wheeler Street: 5332 NE Broadway Location: Portland, OR 97213 E-mail address: swheeler@c-cor.com Comments/Question: Dear BLM,I\m unable to get to the comment page.In case it\s not fixed by the 11th, I want to say I strongly oppose the changes in this draft EIS. Stream setbacks of 100 feet or less are ludicrous. Clear-cutting is irresposible and harmful logging practice. This EIS takes the BLM back to the bad old days before the Clinton years. It certainly looks like something that would come out if the Bush administration where the motto is, \If it\s good for a buck,it\s good for the country.\I urge you to scrap this farcical EIS and return to science-based, sustainable forest management.Steve Wheelerswheeler@c-cor.com |
| EM-2109 | Dave Graham <dgraham@nassets.net> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/7/2008 10:29:22 | Dear BLM,
I drink water and eat fish, please protect my water and fish by opposing th WOPR. I also value old growth forests, tree farms are very ugly and are not a natural ecosystem. There is no economy without ecology, no people without a planet. Please be a leader not a corporate sellout. Dave Graham 112 Alberta St Eugene, OR 97404 |
| EM-2110 | Forwarded by alan_hoffmeister@blm.gov | Fw: WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Question Only | 1/7/2008 10:34:34 | ----- Forwarded by Alan Hoffmeister/ORSO/OR/BLM/DOI on 01/07/2008 10:34 AM -----
nerak@charter.net 01/01/2008 07:57 PM To orsowopr@blm.gov cc Subject WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Question Only Requestor: Karen Schauer Street: 1985 Culver Loop Location: Sutherlin, OR 97479 E-mail address: nerak@charter.net Comments/Question: I request that all old growth trees that are left be protected for what they were worth intrinsically in eons past, for what they are worth asthetically and environmentally at the present and for what they will be worth in the future. There are plenty of \forest tree plantations\ in our state currently have you been to the west side of our state lately to see the cutting? without destroying the whole forest. From what I have read there is only 16 percent of old growth forests left in Oregon - that is a \drop in the bucket\. Would it be a sin to save that small percentage for perhaps state parks or recreation areas for hiking, fishing, or perhaps the simple enjoyment of sheer beauty? If they are in fact, accessible? Let\s face it, most of the real big trees of yesteryear are gone, and what is left of the \old growth forests\ are small and possibly hard to reach. . . again, what would it hurt to save those few trees that are left from the early slaughter o f the giants???? I had the privilege of being in Cristchurch New Zealand in 2002. I learned they actually harvest the trees in valley plantations. Why can\t Oregon do the same? The trees would grow much faster warmer climate and be easier to cut flat land. I believe this procedure is done right here in the southern part of our country Louisiana, Mississippi, with all the flat land in Oregon, why couldn\t we do the same? Well, I am sure there would be restrictions, but it could be incentives for farmers and ranchers to enhance their property they don\t use for grazing, farming, etc.I must sound like a dreamer to you, but, I know the economy has to go on, and that the Oregon economy is so dependent on the lumber industry and people need the jobs and we need the money for schools. I am just a little person in the big picture of all this American forest capitalization. But, I do believe the old growth forests were put here not just for money making purposes, but for someth ing much bigger than that. They were put here just to be what they are, something magnificent and higly beneficial to the animal world as well as the human\s in hundreds of ways.Valley forest plantations, New Zealand saves it forests because it realizes the value of such a resource, and it has large open valley floors. The trees grow very fast, and are ready for cutting in 20 years. Build them here, and reap the benefits, without spoiling what is left of the \old forests\, or just save the old trees, what would it hurt. Here\s another idea, how about a Douglas Fir State Park? Wouldn\t that be nice, just like in California where a small percentage of the giant redwoods were saved, I think, thanks to a Roosevelt, in beautiful parks, and people come from all over the world to see. Oregon could benefit from that as well, it could be open year round, imagine that, a state park dedicated to what is left of Oregon\s magnificent forest giants - it is time, it was almost too lat e for the redwoods, we could all learn something from that near disaster. I had no idea the Douglas Firs are just as beautiful as the redwoods or more so until I moved to this wonderful state five years ago.Karen SchauerSutherlin |
| EM-2111 | Forwarded by alan_hoffmeister@blm.gov | Fw: WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Question Only | 1/7/2008 10:39:19 | ----- Forwarded by Alan Hoffmeister/ORSO/OR/BLM/DOI on 01/07/2008 10:39 AM -----
kungfufreschi@yahoo.com 01/02/2008 07:41 AM To orsowopr@blm.gov cc Subject WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Question Only Requestor: David Freschi Street: 28 Hillside Ave Location: Verona, NJ 07044 E-mail address: kungfufreschi@yahoo.com Comments/Question: Please do not move forward with the current version of WOPR. It is not the best use of our public land. Please consider a plan that preserves more of the land. thank youDave FreschiVerona NJ |
| EM-2112 | Forwarded by alan_hoffmeister@blm.gov | Fw: WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Question Only | 1/7/2008 10:40:09 | ----- Forwarded by Alan Hoffmeister/ORSO/OR/BLM/DOI on 01/07/2008 10:39 AM -----
joelsheila@casco.net 12/31/2007 08:58 AM To orsowopr@blm.gov cc Subject WOPR Draft DEIS Information Request Form - Question Only Requestor: Joel Evans Street: P.O. Box 524 Location: Yachats, OR 97498 E-mail address: joelsheila@casco.net Comments/Question: Are you really going to go ahead with the logging of 2.2 million acres in Western Oregon? We are adamently opposed to this increase. It is nothing but a baldfaced effort by the Bush Administration to undercut the Endangered Species Act. We urge you to abandon WOPR. Our watersheds, our owls and murrelets are at risk. Reconsider this injurious plan. ess. a |
| EM-2113 | Marianna Delinck <marianna@fruition.net> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/7/2008 10:58:34 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clear cut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Marianna Delinck 1728 W, Catalpa Ave. Chicago, IL 60640 |
| EM-2114 | Marianne McElroy <marianne@backcountrygear.com> | Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR) | 1/7/2008 11:14:25 | I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy.
Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Marianne McElroy 2180 Pierce Street, Eugene, OR 97405 |
| EM-2115 | Claudia Beausoleil <mediation.center@earthlink.net> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/7/2008 11:16:44 | Dear BLM,
I am very concerned with the direction the BLM is headed with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes the agency is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. BLM lands in western Oregon contain about 1-million acres of our remaining older forests. The WOPR would increase logging of forests over 200 years sevenfold, and threatens some of Oregon's best remaining ancient forests. Two thousand square miles of forest would be put in "Timber Management Areas," where clearcutting is emphasized. By logging closer to streams the WOPR reduces important protections for clean water and Pacific salmon. High quality drinking water originates on BLM lands for the citizens of Salem, Corvallis, Eugene, and 70 other Oregon communities. Salmon need cool, clean water, but the WOPR would remove stream buffers that shade streams and keep sediment from the water. Please leave the existing protections for riparian areas in place. Wildlife such as elk and black bear and threatened species like the northern spotted owl and the marbled murrelet rely on BLM forests. The WOPR would reduce protections for wildlife populations and diminish habitat for countless plant and wildlife species. Please choose an alternative that leaves habitat protections for wildlife, especially in existing old-growth forests, in place. There are many less sensitive and more practical places to generate wood fiber than our last remaining ancient forests, like the millions of acres of young, even-age tree plantations that have grown since previous clearcuts. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - the BLM would provide wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. Instead, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clearcutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clearcut these natural treasures. Claudia Beausoleil 4495 Cedar Flat Rd. Williams, OR 97544 |
| EM-2116 | Lisa Pratt-Green House Framing <recycledframes@yahoo.com> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/7/2008 11:24:41 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan
Revisions Office 333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Lisa Pratt 3110 SE 71ST Ave. Portland, OR 97206 ----------------------------- Lisa Pratt Co-Owner/Artist Green House Framing www.recycledframes.com 503.777.8420 (Tues-Sat 8-5 PST) ----------------------------- ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs |
| EM-2117 | evelyn roether <evelynkr@gmail.com> | Comments on the WOPR | 1/7/2008 11:25:25 | PO Box 489 Williams, OR 97544
TO: Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office 333 SW 1st. Avenue, Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Greetings, I am writing to express my concern regarding the future management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. As a landowner whose property borders BLM LSR Reserve and an avid recreationalist whose playground is Oregon's public land, my lifestyle and quality of life is directly threatened by the WOPR. More importantly, the WOPR threatens the integrity of Western Oregon's prized ecosystems. If selected, the Preferred Alternative will have devastating effects on the remnant quality old growth and roadless habitat left for animals and will threaten water quality for our world class fish runs. Further, it threatens to unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and could lead to water pollution (by reducing riparian buffers), degraded habitat (with increased roading and clearcutting), and increased conflict and controversy (because the public will not stand for this devastation). The current proposal is unacceptable. The proposed increase of old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, the building of 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcutting at a 9-1 ratio to thinning is WRONG. It is crazy to think that the BLM would even consider turning its back on all the progress that has been made in improving their forest practices. The WORP is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. What about global warming? Science shows that depleted forest cover is exacerbating global warning. It is surely not prudent for the US govt land management agencies to further contribute to this impending global disaster! BLM efforts should be focused on RESTORATION of habitat that has already been degraded by poor management! Polls show that most Americans want federal land managers to focus their efforts on thinning second growth forests and to help safeguard communities from wildfire while protecting what remains of our nation's ancient forests. Previously logged public forestlands are a mess, from what I have seen during my 20+ years of living in Oregon. Most logged over areas are now overgrown with pecker poles and are in need of thinning. This thinned wood can feed local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. People are moving to and visiting Oregon because of its scenery, wildness and outdoor recreation opportunities. These qualities are the promise for a good economic future of our State - not logging! Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. It is of utmost concern that no more roads be built, that riparian reserves remain protected and that old growth habitat remain intact. Please choose the most conservative WOPR alternative and protect our public lands from further degradation. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Evelyn Roether PO Box 489 Williams, OR 97544 |
| EM-2118 | Diane Carlsen <dbmac@web-ster.com> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/7/2008 11:30:55 |
I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. Sincerely, Diane Carlsen P O Box 393 Canby, Oregon 97013 |
| EM-2119 | Northwest Mycological Consultants Inc <nwmycol@peak.org> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/7/2008 11:43:38 |
I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. I support the No Action Alternative. Do not liquidate an unreplaceable resource. We need to study our ancient forests more, not to eliminate them. They are a great resource in alleviating climate change, and this fact should not be ignored; that would be negligence! Sincerely, Kim Kittredge 24245 Ervin Road Philomath, OR 97370 |
| EM-2120 | Anne Borland <aborland@committedpartners.org> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/7/2008 11:53:15 | Bureau of Land Management,
Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office, 333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon, Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation, Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, Please save these treasures for our future generations. Oregon is very unique, nowhere in the world can you find the treasures of old growth that we have here. Let us not fool ourselves into believing that this particular resource is renewable. We will never have it again. Let's show the world our intelligence and forethought and set it aside for the benefit of all not just a few. We must be responsible with our country's gems. Please do what is right for all of us and protect it. Represent the people's wishes. Anne Borland 2463 Adams St., Eugene, Or 97405 (541) 345-8971 |
| EM-2121 | arun <arun@skippingstones.org> | Fw: WOPR | 1/7/2008 12:31:03 | ---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: arun <arun@skippingstones.org> Date: Dec 31, 2007 4:10 PM Subject: WOPR To: info@daylightdecisions.com Dear W.O.P.R. coordinator New Year's Greetings. I want to tell you that: 1. I found it frustrating to make comments on your website. The website for making comments is not user-friendly. Or, did you do it on purpose so as to discourage public comments. A few months ago, I asked for one copy of the proposed revisions and you sent me two big bulky boxes... wasting valuable natural resources. 2. SO, here are my comment: The planned revisions do not protect the Oregon forests. It does more harm than good. The agency is not doing public service but serving commercial interests. With the big global warming issues that we face, you should be trying to increase forests, our natural carbon sinks than what you propose. The future generations will say government and its officials, its agencies and representatives did not do their job. They went for short term profits. I have been reading the letters to the editors in newspapers and I see that your proposals are not at all liked by a majority of the people. 3. Please restore public trust in the government and stop making bad decisions (influenced by economic interests or money-driven). Protect our natural forests. I hope you will give us public some good news in 2008 as a new year present. Protect Western Oregon's Forests for ever. arun Arun Toké arun@skippingstones.org |
| EM-2122 | Benjamin VanderVeen <benvanderveen@gmail.com> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/7/2008 12:34:21 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, BENJAMIN VANDERVEEN Benjamin VanderVeen | 5264 NE 17th Avenue Portland, OR 97211 | www.benvanderveen.com | 734.223.9227 |
| EM-2123 | Collin Palkovitz <collin@elanyarts.com> | WORP | 1/7/2008 13:04:36 | Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions
Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, |
| EM-2124 | Richard Powell <dick@starkerforests.com> | WOPR - Protect, Sustain, Use, and Manage BLM forests | 1/7/2008 13:25:42 | Some thoughts on federal forest land management policies
DickPowell January 6, 2008 I'm an old codger whose forestry career began in 1962 when I entered forestry school. Except for a stint in the US Air Force in the late 60's, I've been in forestry that whole time. This has given me forty-five years to observe and learn about forests as well as lots of time to practice the art and science of forestry. I have some thoughts on BLM's WOPR. But first, there must be some understanding of biology and history. Without both, the WOPR process is pointless. Biology: In very simple terms, a forest is an ecosystem that happens to be dominated by trees; it is the presence of trees that distinguishes it from all other ecosystems. Without trees, the ecosystem would be a prairie, a desert, or something else. Further, all organisms in this and all other ecosystems germinate, hatch, or are born; they grow, mature, reproduce, and die. This biological truism is as certain with trees as with all other organisms. The life cycle is very short for some organisms (worms and zinnias) and very long for others (elephants and trees). While it is true that some tree species are capable of living a very long time, they will die. That all organisms have a finite lifespan is a biological given; that is nature's means of renewing itself. Up to a point, the best we can do is merely ensure that an organism does not meet an early demise. That means we see the doctor when we are ill or we take our pets or livestock to the veterinarian. In the case of forests, we try to prevent wildfire or insect or disease epidemics. We can choose to not cut a tree and hope it grows to an old age; we can hope that windstorms and volcanic eruptions do not destroy the forest. Nonetheless, all organisms, including trees, will die. Again, this is a biological given and we should all have learned this in our high school biology classes. It follows, therefore, that no living thing can be "saved" or "preserved". Since we can not preserve individual organisms, the question then becomes: How do we ensure the continued existence of a species as the individuals will surely die? How do we preserve a biological system? Again, the answer is simple biology - we make sure both the species and the system reproduce and perpetuate themselves. People have children and dogs have puppies. Roses and trees produce seeds and birds and turtles lay eggs. These are nature's means of reproduction and perpetuation/renewal. The old dies and makes way for the new. It also follows that every stand of trees will grow old and will die. There are many disturbance mechanisms out in the world; things such as disease, wind, fire, volcanoes, floods, and insects. All of these are nature's mechanisms that allow the forest to renew itself. (If that biology was not true, then we would all live to be hundreds of years old and we would routinely find forests that are many thousands of years old.) What does all this have to do with the management of forest ecosystems? How do we ensure the ecosystem perpetuates itself? Again, it all comes back to biology; we allow/assist the forest to renew itself as it ages or is destroyed by any of nature's disturbance mechanisms. History: I feel that much of the drive to "preserve" our forests is a desire to keep or return the forests as they were prior to the Europeans (i.e., Columbus in 1492). It is a desire to dehumanize the landscape. However, that desire completely overlooks history; it completely ignores the American Indian and their relationship with and management of the landscape. It is as if these people either did not exist, did not have the intellect to manage the landscape, or were a benign part of the landscape. Over the past several years, I've been reading a lot of history, particularly as it pertains to the environment. From that reading, I've found that, prior to Columbus, there was a very large, complex, native population throughout North, Central, and South America. These people were not nearly as nomadic as our school textbooks and movies would have us believe. Instead, many of these people lived in very large, sophisticated, stable, agrarian societies that, in many ways, were far superior to anything found in Europe. One of the largest and densest populations was the people in the Pacific Northwestwho relied on fishing. (In fact, a number of the colonists left the colonies and lived with the Indians. Some were forcibly, oftentimes in chains, returned to white society.) As people throughout time have done all over the world, these people were active and intensive managers of their landscapes. Their management was purposeful, planned, and made frequent use of fire. One author is of the opinion that the eastern US was a mix of orchards and farms (note that he said "orchards", not "forests"). In places, deforestation was a problem to these people. Increasingly, historians are coming to believe that the "native" prairies and oak savanna/woodlands of the WillametteValleyand adjacent hills were created and then maintained by people. (In fact, one historian told me he thinks Oregonwhite oak might even be an introduced species!) There is some thinking that deforestation and other human-caused disturbances to ecosystems actually caused the downfall of many early American civilizations. In other words, there were some Native American groups who had so altered the landscape that their needs could no longer be met. As a consequence, their societies collapsed and the forests grew back. They, as we are today, were totally dependent on natural resources but they did not always understand the concept of sustainable use of those resources. This management strongly influenced both flora and fauna. For instance, bison were not found in the southeastern US until after the native human populations had largely died off due to introduced European diseases. Because passenger pigeons were an excellent source of protein, good to eat, and easy to hunt, it follows that archaeologists should have found pigeon bones in villages and campsites. They did not. However, John Muir and others some years later reported huge flocks of these birds. Why the difference? One has to conclude that humans were the "keystone species"; the species that affects the survival and abundance of many other species. Thus, the last time there was a truly "natural" landscape was probably prior to the arrival of humans some 12-14,000 years ago. Since their arrival, the landscape has been consciously shaped by people. This includes the landscape found by the Europeans beginning with Columbusin 1492 and the landscape we find today. [Thomas Bonnicksen, Daniel Botkin, Bob Zybach, Steven Pyne, Douglas MacCleery, Jack Weatherford, Charles Kay, Charles Mann, James Loewen, Jared Diamond, and others are producing work that is giving a much clearer picture of the Native Americans and their relationship with the landscape.] The Sierra Nevada- a case study: Let's assume we can completely remove people from the forest and let's assume we have no economic or social interest in the forest; we have only biology. Dr. Thomas M. Bonnicksen, TexasA&MUniversity, has done considerable research in the ancient forests of the Sierra Nevada. In a 1993 paper, Ancient Forests of the Sierra Nevada, Bonnicksen says our forests have evolved with humans and that, "Erecting barriers that exclude people removes this natural force and begins chains of events that create new and artificial ecological communities. Locking up forests within dehumanized reserves radically alters nature to satisfy the esthetic taste of one segment of society." In the same paper, Bonnicksen says that John Muir wrote in 1894, "The inviting openness of the Sierra woods is one of their most distinguishing characteristics. The trees of all the species stand more or less apart in groves, or in small irregular groups enabling one to find a way nearly everywhere, along sunny colonnades and through openings that have a smooth, park-like surface." Muir spoke of the ground around the trees as "flowery". He described the ancient forest as a mosaic of even-aged groups of trees - some old and some young. There were openings of wildflowers and shrubs. Bonnicksen confirmed Muir's observations. In a study, he found that in these ancient forests: shrubs covered 19 percent of the ground and seedlings and saplings covered 28 percent. Pole-sized trees covered 15 percent of the ground. Clumps of large, old, even-aged trees covered 18 percent. The remainder consisted of meadows, gaps, and rocks. Each of these clumps was continuously changing as they grew older, died, or was replaced. Disturbances accelerated the process by thinning or destroying groups of trees; fire was the most powerful of these disturbances. Some fires were lightning-caused, but most were set by the Indians to create a landscape that better suited their needs. (Among their many reasons for burning, they burned to regenerate and protect black oak. These produced acorns which was their principle source of food.) These fires were frequent and low intensity. These fires occasionally killed clumps of trees and created openings in the forest. Large wildfires were extremely rare. However, excluding people (the Indians) and their fires has dramatically changed the forests. The 'protected' ancient forests are disappearing. The clumps of seedlings and saplings have declined dramatically as have the shrubs and hardwoods. Young trees (particularly white fir which can germinate in duff) have increased and have invaded the understory of the larger trees. Declining species are ponderosa pine, sugar pine, sequoia, and black oak; these all require openings (i.e., sunlight) and bare soil to germinate. For a time, Bonnicksen projects the forest will consist largely of big, old trees and have a tremendous amount of fuel. The forest will be "visually impressive" and be "completely artificial". Because of the lack of young trees in the landscape, when the old trees die or are killed by fire, the newly regenerated forest will closely resemble a plantation. These plantations will be the complete opposite of what many want our federal forests to be. To be sure, giant sequoias are not the trees we have in western Oregonand the Sierras are not the same as the Cascades or the CoastRange. Nonetheless, the principles of disturbance and biology work equally well in both places. The perpetuation of the forest requires renewal. The "perfect" forest: In a "perfect" world, we would see something like the following: [IMAGE] This graph is saying that in a "perfect" world, there is a whole continuum of forest ages; all the way from very young to very old. It is a whole and complete forest. To be sure, the line on this graph is not perfect and, because of natural disturbances to the forest, the line is not straight. Nonetheless, over a very long time and over a very large landscape, the line should smooth out and more or less approximate this graph. This forest has very young stands as well as immature, mature, and very old stands. By having this whole continuum of forests present at all times, this forest always has another stand immediately available to replace a stand that is lost to any natural or human-caused disturbance. Flora and fauna whose habitat is lost in one part of the landscape can find similar habitat nearby. This is nature at work and at its best. This forest also has the widest possible range of diversity. At all times, it has the habitats necessary for all species of both flora and fauna. It accommodates those species requiring young forests as well as old forests and everything in between. This forest could also support a great range of human use of the forest and the commodities produced. (In fact, it supported the Native Americans for many thousands of years!) There could be small-log mills as well as large-log mills. There could be people employed in the mills as well as in the forest. There could be commodities of very high value as well as lower value. Harvest receipts and tax revenues could flow into government coffers. This would be a whole and a complete forest and it probably closely approximates the forests prior to human exclusion. Today's model for tomorrow's forest: Using today's management model, we could expect something like the following: [IMAGE] This shows the forest industry with 22% of Oregon's forests and growing forests with short rotations. (Though this can vary greatly by owner, this example shows a 40-year rotation - it could just as easily be 30 years or 70 years.) It shows the federal government with 57% of Oregon's forest with the intent of creating primarily "late successional reserves" (LSR). The remaining 21% of Oregon's forests (state, municipal, small private landowners, etc.) are probably grown for something older than industry forests but less than federal forests. Also, as the industry acquires more and more of the lands now owned by the smaller private landowners, this graph will be skewed even more towards lands managed for either short-rotations (industry) or LSR (federal). As a consequence, the acreages of middle-aged forests (and the habitats they provide) will be increasingly underrepresented. Again, this is not a perfect representation but, under the current Northwest Forest Plan, the intent is for mostly LSR on federal lands, particularly on national forest lands. Of course, because of disease, fire, and other natural disturbance mechanisms, federal forests will never be exactly like this graph. Nonetheless, current forest policy seems aimed in this direction. Despite all the perceived faults or problems some see with forest industry and other private forest landowners, it is an indisputable fact that the owners of these lands are ensuring the forest is constantly being renewed. This is a business necessity (otherwise a company runs out of trees and goes out of business) and a biological necessity. Further, Oregon's Forest Practices Act requires the forest be renewed - it is the law! The federal forests (particularly the US Forest Service), on the other hand, are looking to have as much LSR as possible. The assumption seems to be that LSR status can be achieved and then "preserved". An understanding of biology and natural disturbance says these assumptions are false. A forest is not static and it will change. That is a biological given. In the absence of any harvesting, federal forests will have young forests only when there is a natural disturbance. Except for very large catastrophic events (e.g., the Yellowstone, Biscuit, or B&B Fires, Columbus Day Storms, or Mt. St. Helens Eruptions), there will be very little young forest. (Of course that assumes the disturbed area is regenerated quickly which is not a given.) It folloIf we want old growth forests in the future, we must produce a |
| EM-2125 | Northwest Mycological Consultants Inc <nwmycol@peak.org> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/7/2008 13:26:13 |
I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks. Sincerely, John Donoghue Corvallis Oregon YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS |
| EM-2126 | Amy Balint <foglark@gmail.com> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/7/2008 13:27:53 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Amy Balint 970 W. 3rd Ave. Eugene, OR 97402 |
| EM-2127 | Gail Mast <gailm@thejugscompany.com> | Stop WOPR - Protect BLM forests | 1/7/2008 13:32:36 | I am very concerned about the 2.6 million acres of forest managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Oregon. The BLM is moving forward with the Western Oregon Plan Revision, which will increase logging in Oregon's old-growth forests sevenfold by clearcutting in currently protected old growth forest reserves and sensitive salmon bearing rivers and creeks.
Let's not destory these trees that would affect so much in our ecosystem! Sincerely, YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS Gail Mast 10854 SW Parkwood Lane Wilsonville, OR 97070 |
| EM-2128 | Suzie Hemphill <falconsoar@sbcglobal.net> | BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions | 1/7/2008 13:52:45 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue, Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Suzie Hemphill MajesticVelvets.com http://stores.ebay.com/Royal-Coffers |
| EM-2129 | mtaylor@cnsp.com | PLEASE Protect the Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/7/2008 14:34:55 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable! The proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate! Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests! It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests!! Sincerely, Muriel Taylor 8048 Silver Fox Way Chesapeake Beach MD 20732 |
| EM-2130 | Sara Leverette <saraleverette@gmail.com> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/7/2008 14:49:01 | Dear BLM,
I am very concerned with the direction the BLM is headed with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes the agency is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. BLM lands in western Oregon contain about 1-million acres of our remaining older forests. The WOPR would increase logging of forests over 200 years sevenfold, and threatens some of Oregon's best remaining ancient forests. Two thousand square miles of forest would be put in "Timber Management Areas," where clearcutting is emphasized. By logging closer to streams the WOPR reduces important protections for clean water and Pacific salmon. High quality drinking water originates on BLM lands for the citizens of Salem, Corvallis, Eugene, and 70 other Oregon communities. Salmon need cool, clean water, but the WOPR would remove stream buffers that shade streams and keep sediment from the water. Please leave the existing protections for riparian areas in place. Wildlife such as elk and black bear and threatened species like the northern spotted owl and the marbled murrelet rely on BLM forests. The WOPR would reduce protections for wildlife populations and diminish habitat for countless plant and wildlife species. Please choose an alternative that leaves habitat protections for wildlife, especially in existing old-growth forests, in place. There are many less sensitive and more practical places to generate wood fiber than our last remaining ancient forests, like the millions of acres of young, even-age tree plantations that have grown since previous clearcuts. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - the BLM would provide wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. Instead, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clearcutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clearcut these natural treasures. Sara Leverette 3726 SE 16th Ave Portland, OR 97202 |
| EM-2131 | Lance Bisaccia <em4lanceb@mind.net> | The WOPR | 1/7/2008 14:51:33 | To the BLM:
The WOPR is a terrible plan. Such a radical increase in the total cut -- and in the amount of clearcutting -- is appallingly irresponsible, both in the harm it will do locally, to many essential life systems, and in its exacerbation of the climate crisis. Lance Bisaccia PO Box 579 Ashland, OR 97520 cc: Senator Ron Wyden Senator Gordon Smith Rep. Greg Walden |
| EM-2132 | Benjamin VanderVeen <benvanderveen@gmail.com> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/7/2008 15:13:59 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Ben Veen Benjamin VanderVeen | +Two Collective | ben@plustwocollective.com | 734.223.9227 |
| EM-2133 | Matthew Bristow <myst567@yahoo.com> | Please protect our old-growth forests! | 1/7/2008 15:18:00 | Dear BLM,
I live in Oregon for a variety of reasons, including the old-growth forests, excellent recreation, and opportunities to view wildlife on public lands. After learning about the BLM's Western Oregon Plan Revisions, I am very concerned this plan will degrade my ability to enjoy the public lands in western Oregon. The changes the Bureau of Land Management is proposing will unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan for old-growth forests and wildlife, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Some of my concerns include: - I'm disappointed that all special areas (Research Natural Areas and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern) won't be protected from logging under WOPR. These areas contain unique values that many people seek out to enjoy. These areas should not be opened to logging. - The increased, widespread clearcutting of forests under WOPR could reduce property values and the quality of life of thousands of Oregonians living near BLM lands. Over 1,000 miles of new logging road and 140,000 acres of clearcuts in the first decade alone would scar Oregon's spectacular landscape. - Clearcutting of old growth forests and proposed "Off Highway Vehicle Emphasis Areas" threaten the peace and quiet for rural residents, visitors, and wildlife. Oregon needs rural residents and tourism to feed our economy - catering to the timber and motorized vehicle industry alone is not a solution. Oregon's remaining old-growth forests are a treasure -- offering wonderful recreation opportunities, clean water, homes for wildlife, and offsetting global warming. But the WOPR is a step back to the unsustainable days of clear-cutting this amazing resource, endangering wildlife, muddying streams, and fueling public outcry. A better way is to protect our heritage forests and focus on thinning and restoration of the plentiful unhealthy plantations left over from the last logging boom. This approach would safeguard the many values of old-growth forests that make Oregon a place I want to live, while providing sustainable jobs and other economic benefits for rural communities. Matthew Bristow 2802 SE Monroe St Milwaukie, OR 97222-7667 |
| EM-2134 | Potter Stephanie Potter <spottermail@earthlink.net> | Say No to the WOPR!!! | 1/7/2008 15:30:36 | Dear BLM,
I find it distressing that the BLM wants to increase logging of old growth forests and reduce stream buffers from 300 to as few as 25 feet with it's Western Oregon Plan Revisions. This threat to salmon and wildlife is huge, much less the effect it would have on people who make their living from the tourist industry and who appreciate Oregon's heritage.The changes the agency is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. BLM lands in western Oregon contain about 1-million acres of our remaining older forests. The WOPR would threatens some of Oregon's best remaining ancient forests. Two thousand square miles of forest would be put in "Timber Management Areas," where clearcutting is emphasized. Logging old growth forests may make money in the short run, but what happens when the old growth is gone? And what about the fire danger of monoculture, immature tree plantations. And what about landslides from clear cuts, as we saw recently in Clatskine? By logging closer to streams the WOPR reduces important protections for clean water and Pacific salmon. High quality drinking water originates on BLM lands for the citizens of Salem, Corvallis, Eugene, and 70 other Oregon communities. Salmon need cool, clean water, but the WOPR would remove stream buffers that shade streams and keep sediment from the water. Please leave the existing protections for riparian areas in place. Wildlife such as elk and black bear and threatened species like the northern spotted owl and the marbled murrelet rely on BLM forests. The WOPR would reduce protections for wildlife populations and diminish habitat for countless plant and wildlife species. Please choose an alternative that leaves habitat protections for wildlife, especially in existing old-growth forests, in place. There are many less sensitive and more practical places to generate wood fiber than our last remaining ancient forests, like the millions of acres of young, even-age tree plantations that have grown since previous clearcuts. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - the BLM would provide wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. And with the threat of global warming we should be preserving our forests as carbon storage sites--not adding to the heating of our planet!!! The WOPR proposes to the logging conflicts of the 80's by increasing old-growth clearcutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clearcut these natural treasures. Say NO to the WOPR!!!!!! Potter Stephanie Potter 3226 NE Davis Portland, OR 97232 |
| EM-2135 | Vicki Shaylor <vickishaylor@hamptonaffiliates.com> | BLM Western Oregon Plan Revision | 1/7/2008 15:40:40 | Vicki Shaylor
16080 SW 80th PL Tigard, OR 97224-7588 January 7, 2008 Edward Shepard OR/WA State Director Bureau of Land Management PO Box 2965 Portland, OR 97208 Dear Edward Shepard: Please accept the following comments on the BLM's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Revision of the Resource Management Plans for Western Oregon. The BLM must develop and analyzes at least one alternative that maximizes the amount of land in timber production and receipts to local county governments, and meets its no jeopardy obligation. Congress and the Administration must ensure that when the Plan is finalized that the BLM receives adequate funding so that it can be fully implemented. In summary, the economic viability of our rural communities and the overall health of our federal forests are of vital importance to me. I ask that you give these comments full consideration as you prepare the final Environmental Impact Statement and select the final management plans for the Western Oregon BLM Districts. Sincerely, Vicki Shaylor 503/203-6497 |
| EM-2136 | Matthew Lutter <mlutter@bhengineers.com> | Don't log old growth forest!!! Get rid of the WOPR!!! | 1/7/2008 15:42:42 | Dear BLM,
I love to hike in old growth forests, observe wildlife in old growth forests and creek habitat, and hunt for mushrooms in old growth forests. I love to go fishing in wild and scenic river areas surrounded by old growth forest. I love to camp out in old growth forests. I need old growth forests to keep me going in this crazy world. And I am not alone in Oregon. I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Matt Lutter 1185 W. 25th Ave Eugene, OR 97405 Matt Lutter Commissioning Technician Balzhiser & Hubbard Engineers Mechanical - Electrical - Civil - Energy - Lighting - Surveying - Commissioning - Sustainability 100 West 13th Avenue, Eugene, Oregon 97401 (541) 686-8478 fax (541) 345-5303 |
| EM-2137 | Rob Feng <rob@brandnewschool.com> | Protect Public Forests, Rivers and Wildlife | 1/7/2008 15:46:30 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and may lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what remains of our nation's ancient forests. By focusing on previously logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of precious old-growth forests. In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon's most special places. We should protect our remaining mature and old- growth forests on public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes to do. It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old- growth protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex ecosystems into flammable tree farms. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Robert J Feng 6200 Banner Ave. #1 Los Angeles CA 90038 |
| EM-2138 | Carole LaVigne <clavigne@warpmail.net> | Protect Old Growth Forests | 1/7/2008 15:46:34 | Bureau of Land Management, Western Oregon Plan Revisions Office
333 SW 1st. Avenue Portland, Oregon Portland, OR 97208 CC: Oregon Congressional delegation Re: BLM Western Oregon Plan Revisions Dear BLM, I am writing to urge you to reject the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest Forest Plan, and will lead to water pollution, degraded mature forest habitat, and increased conflict and controversy. Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build 1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1 ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes our natural resource base for future generations by weakening protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate. Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes. Sincerely, Carole LaVigne PO Box 553 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0553 |
| EM-2139 | Laura Wickstrom <laurawickstrom@hamptonaffiliates.com> | BLM Western Oregon Plan Revision | 1/7/2008 16:07:25 | Laura Wickstrom
17370 Keasey Road Vernonia, OR 97064 January 7, 2008 Edward Shepard OR/WA State Director Bureau of Land Management PO Box 2965 Portland, OR 97208 Dear Edward Shepard: Please accept the following comments on the BLM's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Revision of the Resource Management Plans for Western Oregon. None of the three alternatives presented in the DEIS meet the requirements of the O&C Act because they do not manage the land for the dominant use of timber production. Reserving the majority (52%) of the suitable timberlands for the purpose of a listed species is contrary to the O&C Act. Because of the unique nature of the O&C Lands, by law these lands are not available to be part of a reserve system designed to recover a listed species. The BLM should consider active management for the protection of listed and sensitive species and their habitat before adopting passive, reserve strategies. The alternative selected by the BLM, however, should be one that will not jeopardize the continued existence of listed species within the species entire habitat range. The BLM must develop and analyzes at least one alternative that maximizes the amount of land in timber production and receipts to local county governments, and meets its no jeopardy obligation. Congress and the Administration must ensure that when the Plan is finalized that the BLM receives adequate funding so that it can be fully implemented. When implemented, the Plan should live up to the full commitment that was made to local counties. Timber sale revenues must generate at least an amount equal to the funding that was provided to local counties through the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act on a yearly basis. All BLM administered land should be managed to minimize the threat of catastrophic wildfire on these lands and surrounding state and private lands. Access should be maintained through BLM administered lands for private land access, fire suppression, as well as recreational uses, such as hunting, fishing, boating and sightseeing. In summary, the economic viability of our rural communities and the overall health of our federal forests are of vital importance to me. I ask that you give these comments full consideration as you prepare the final Environmental Impact Statement and select the final management plans for the Western Oregon BLM Districts. Sincerely, Laura Wickstrom |
| EM-2140 | Bruce Branson <brucebranson@hamptonaffiliates.com> | BLM Western Oregon Plan Revision | 1/7/2008 16:08:28 | Bruce Branson
1000 Willamina Creek Rd Willamina, OR 97396 January 7, 2008 Edward Shepard OR/WA State Director Bureau of Land Management PO Box 2965 Portland, OR 97208 Dear Edward Shepard: Please accept the following comments on the BLM's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Revision of the Resource Management Plans for Western Oregon. None of the three alternatives presented in the DEIS meet the requirements of the O&C Act because they do not manage the land for the dominant use of timber production. Reserving the majority (52%) of the suitable timberlands for the purpose of a listed species is contrary to the O&C Act. Because of the unique nature of the O&C Lands, by law these lands are not available to be part of a reserve system designed to recover a listed species. The BLM should consider active management for the protection of listed and sensitive species and their habitat before adopting passive, reserve strategies. The alternative selected by the BLM, however, should be one that will not jeopardize the continued existence of listed species within the species entire habitat range. The BLM must develop and analyzes at least one alternative that maximizes the amount of land in timber production and receipts to local county governments, and meets its no jeopardy obligation. Congress and the Administration must ensure that when the Plan is finalized that the BLM receives adequate funding so that it can be fully implemented. When implemented, the Plan should live up to the full commitment that was made to local counties. Timber sale revenues must generate at least an amount equal to the funding that was provided to local counties through the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act on a yearly basis. All BLM administered land should be managed to minimize the threat of catastrophic wildfire on these lands and surrounding state and private lands. Access should be maintained through BLM administered lands for private land access, fire suppression, as well as recreational uses, such as hunting, fishing, boating and sightseeing. In summary, the economic viability of our rural communities and the overall health of our federal forests are of vital importance to me. I ask that you give these comments full consideration as you prepare the final Environmental Impact Statement and select the final management plans for the Western Oregon BLM Districts. Sincerely, Bruce Branson 503-876-1328 |
| EM-2141 | JANE CAPIZZI <jgcapizzi@msn.com> | westernoregonplanrevision | 1/7/2008 16:09:50 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions--BLM
To whom it may concern: I have a few comments on the WOPR from the viewpoint of a fisherman, birder, citizen, Izaak Walton League past division president and an Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commissioner. 1. The preferred alternative allows logging within 25 feet from a stream. This will cause water temperature and fish habitat to be undesirable and deadly to the salmon, steelhead, trout and other cold water species. The mess left along streams will be unsightly. Tourism and just the pleasure of us ordinary people-fishing or just rafting-will be ruined. As is the usual case, the old $ comes in to hopefully tip the scales toward keeping Oregon attractive and inviting. 2. It is hard to believe BLM people of persuasion haven't been to the North Unpqua River, up the Sandy River, or to the North Santiam River to learn how valueable it is to fish and wildlife. It is crucial that these special beautiful fish and wildlife habitats not be eliminated. 3. As for Off Highway Vehicles, they have been illegally trespassing on federal, state, and private land since before the early 80's. When I was an Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commissioner through the 80's I asked the Oregon State Police Game Enforcement officer, Major Hyder, to check how other states were handling this problem. In most states the rules were in place but they were not being enforced. ` 4. It is short sighted to cut old growth trees when there is plenty of younger or unwanted trees available. The NW Forest Plan should be followed. The old growth habitat takes so long to be valuable to animal and birds of all sizes and degrees of threatened or endangered classification. The food chain crashes when the old growth trees crash. Finally, I hope the designers of this latest plan will listen to the biologists and rewrite the plan for the greatest scientific benefit to the fish and wildlife of our great state. Sincerely, Jane G. Capizzi 5440 SW Skyview Ave. Corvallis, Oregon 97333 |
| EM-2142 | icastes@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:11:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Kalev Pehme 389 Palos Verdes Blvd. #43 Redondo Beach, CA 90277 |
| EM-2143 | patrickl@mac.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:11:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Patrick Lovell 12244 Military Rd So Seattle, WA 98168 2427 |
| EM-2144 | amrsb@worldnet.att.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:11:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, richard schwartz 1676 Tacoma Ave Berkeley, CA 94707 |
| EM-2145 | jackdbrownjr@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:11:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Jack Brown Jr 334 3rd Ave N Payette, ID 83661 |
| EM-2146 | Tamara Shadbolt <shadbolt@interserv.com> | BLM Western Oregon Plan Revision | 1/7/2008 16:12:05 | Tamara Shadbolt
11640 SW Tiedeman Ave Tigard, OR 97223 January 7, 2008 Edward Shepard OR/WA State Director Bureau of Land Management PO Box 2965 Portland, OR 97208 Dear Edward Shepard: Please accept the following comments on the BLM's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Revision of the Resource Management Plans for Western Oregon. None of the three alternatives presented in the DEIS meet the requirements of the O&C Act because they do not manage the land for the dominant use of timber production. Reserving the majority (52%) of the suitable timberlands for the purpose of a listed species is contrary to the O&C Act. Because of the unique nature of the O&C Lands, by law these lands are not available to be part of a reserve system designed to recover a listed species. The BLM should consider active management for the protection of listed and sensitive species and their habitat before adopting passive, reserve strategies. The alternative selected by the BLM, however, should be one that will not jeopardize the continued existence of listed species within the species entire habitat range. The BLM must develop and analyzes at least one alternative that maximizes the amount of land in timber production and receipts to local county governments, and meets its no jeopardy obligation. Congress and the Administration must ensure that when the Plan is finalized that the BLM receives adequate funding so that it can be fully implemented. When implemented, the Plan should live up to the full commitment that was made to local counties. Timber sale revenues must generate at least an amount equal to the funding that was provided to local counties through the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act on a yearly basis. All BLM administered land should be managed to minimize the threat of catastrophic wildfire on these lands and surrounding state and private lands. Access should be maintained through BLM administered lands for private land access, fire suppression, as well as recreational uses, such as hunting, fishing, boating and sightseeing. In summary, the economic viability of our rural communities and the overall health of our federal forests are of vital importance to me. I ask that you give these comments full consideration as you prepare the final Environmental Impact Statement and select the final management plans for the Western Oregon BLM Districts. Sincerely, Tamara A. Shadbolt 503-624-6366 |
| EM-2147 | staylor4@tribune.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Steven Taylor 1702 Pullman Ln. Redondo Beach, CA 90278 |
| EM-2148 | lyle.funderburk@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Lyle Funderburk 610 NW Davis #2 Portland, OR 97209 |
| EM-2149 | scott_d_rankin@msn.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Scott Rankin 3917 SW Portland St. Seattle, WA 98136 |
| EM-2150 | mamalove@prodigy.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Sheri Norwood 125 N Allen Ave #211 Pasadena, CA 91106 |
| EM-2151 | bdill@earthjustice.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Brianaction Dill 426 17th Street, 6th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 |
| EM-2152 | aosmithaos@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Andrew Osborne-Smith 911 Leslie Court San Carlos, CA 94070 |
| EM-2153 | kcarbonn@fhcrc.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Karen Carbonneau 4500 Palatine Ave. North #101 Seattle, WA 98103 |
| EM-2154 | mfleming@earthjustice.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Maggie fleming 426 17th street oakland, CA 94612 |
| EM-2155 | darynnej@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, darynne jessler 4408 gentry ave Valley Village, CA 91607 |
| EM-2156 | aingerj@saccounty.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Joel Ainger 2313 25Th Ave Sacramento, CA 95822 |
| EM-2157 | patkl@charter.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Pat LeBaron 2368 Amaryllis Medford, OR 97504 |
| EM-2158 | careycorr@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Carey Corr 31 Seascape Drive Newport Beach, CA 92663 |
| EM-2159 | betsy.carey@phs.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Elizabeth Carey 3044 S. Kerckhoff Ave. San Pedro, CA 90731 |
| EM-2160 | c262@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:12:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Chris Egle 616 Brookside Ave. #6 Redlands, CA 92373 |
| EM-2161 | Michael Lynam <mikelynam@hamptonaffiliates.com> | BLM Western Oregon Plan Revision | 1/7/2008 16:12:23 | Michael Lynam
39216 Ski Park Road East Eatonville, WA 98328 January 7, 2008 Edward Shepard OR/WA State Director Bureau of Land Management PO Box 2965 Portland, OR 97208 Dear Edward Shepard: Please accept the following comments on the BLM's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Revision of the Resource Management Plans for Western Oregon. Because of the unique nature of the O&C Lands, by law these lands are not available to be part of a reserve system designed to recover a listed species. The BLM should consider active management for the protection of listed and sensitive species and their habitat before adopting passive, reserve strategies. The alternative selected by the BLM, however, should be one that will not jeopardize the continued existence of listed species within the species entire habitat range. When implemented, the Plan should live up to the full commitment that was made to local counties. Timber sale revenues must generate at least an amount equal to the funding that was provided to local counties through the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act on a yearly basis. In summary, the economic viability of our rural communities and the overall health of our federal forests are of vital importance to me. I ask that you give these comments full consideration as you prepare the final Environmental Impact Statement and select the final management plans for the Western Oregon BLM Districts. Sincerely, Michael Lynam 360-630-9983 |
| EM-2162 | Jerry and Toy LeChien <punkn@oregonfast.net> | a comment of the BLM Western Oregon Plan | 1/7/2008 16:12:45 | To whom it may concern, January 7, 2008
I have heard some of the comments and read some of the information on your website about the new plans for cutting over 48% of the old growth frorests. My husband and I are so saddened to hear that this fight continues, after all we've already lost because of the greed of our humanity. We would have hoped that the old trees and the beautiful life giving sancuary they provide would be considered a living thing that should not be destroyed. We would ask that there be no action taken against these trees. If necessary, only managed forest thinning of younger trees should be done. The replanting of trees sounds nice, but I have planted a few trees myself, and they are not ever going to grow into the giants we can see in our forests hundreds of years old! Here in Florence, there are several large clear cut areas along the highway 101 you can see from the road while driving by. It looks terrible. It looks like a bomb went off. We call it "ground zero". There doesn't seem to be any new trees planted there. I am sure the habitat is destroyed. Fire will happen. I am sure we will never be able to control that. Some forests that pose a threat to the population and their homes and structures might be better off if some of the undergrowth is thinned down? But we do believe that our earth was created to work and function just fine without our interferance or our so called "help". We moved from southern california 30 years ago to get out of the land of concrete and streets, smog and cars. We moved to Oregon because of the beauty of it's forests, streams, and wild areas. Our children deserve to see and enjoy these same wild and beautiful places. Please preserve our old growth forests. Set up another lotto or "casino" for the money they say they need so badly. Just where is all that money going anyway? People are spending thousands of dollars of those things every day. There could be a "Save the forest lotto". We hope you take our suggestions to your highest authority, and, we hope you agree, the trees and forests should not be clearcut. Mr and Mrs LeChien 53 Rhody Lp Florence, OR 97439 punkn@oregonfast.net |
| EM-2163 | regina@romancingyoursoul.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Regina Cates 318 S. Reeves Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90212 |
| EM-2164 | lleifer@fielding.edu | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Laura Leifer 1216 Cuesta Street Santa Ynez, CA 93460 |
| EM-2165 | tof@cox.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Johannah Frank 2685 Sunset Hills Escondido, CA 92025 |
| EM-2166 | goredwings@charter.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Stacey Smith 3008 Shipway Avenue Long Beach, CA 90808 |
| EM-2167 | jackiedern@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This is horrible and a terrible use of my/our/public land!!! This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Jacqueline Dern 9708 116th Ave NE Kirkland, WA 9803 |
| EM-2168 | pamgreen11@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Pamela Green 2200 Pacific Ave., Unit 11E San Francisco, CA 94115 |
| EM-2169 | babybuddha@coastside.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Amanda Dorell p.o.box 177 El Granada, CA 94018 |
| EM-2170 | moranacus@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Victor Glock 2412 Judson St. San Diego, CA 92111 |
| EM-2171 | chansen@loweenterprises.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Charlotte Hansen 11777 San Vicente Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90049 |
| EM-2172 | mikecroman@earthlink.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Michael Croman "3333 Madrona Beach Road, NW" Olympia, WA 98502 |
| EM-2173 | jackiepeloquin@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Jackie Peloquin 3138 W. Dakota Ave #234 Fresno, CA 93722 |
| EM-2174 | erika12572@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Erika Huston 6206 NE 25th Avenue Portland, OR 97211 |
| EM-2175 | akames@ucsc.edu | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Alexander Ames 228 Mountain View Ave Apt C Santa Cruz, CA 95062 |
| EM-2176 | mermishwomyn@msn.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Stefanie Zier 1935 21st Avenue SE Apt 98 Albany, OR 97322 |
| EM-2177 | david@davidspero.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, David Spero 2325 Casitas Way Palm Springs, CA 92264-8219 |
| EM-2178 | viettilsw@att.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Kara Vietti 2113 Vernon Rd. Lake Stevens, WA 98258 |
| EM-2179 | jacornwall@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Judith Cornwall 18209 167th Ave NE Woodinville, WA 98072 |
| EM-2180 | gmseverson@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Gregory Severson 15414 35th ave W. #6 Lynnwood, WA 98037 |
| EM-2181 | moongdes@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Diana Ginnebaugh 969G La Mesa Ter Sunnyvale, CA 94086 |
| EM-2182 | ingrid.behrsin@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, ingrid behrsin 990 Euclid Ave. suite P Berkeley, CA 94708 |
| EM-2183 | jzawaski@alnella.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Joan Zawaski 2883 MacArthur Blvd. Oakland, CA 94602 |
| EM-2184 | ahimsa9@juno.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, shannon abernathy 320 Dakota Ave. # 6 santa cruz, CA 95060 |
| EM-2185 | felstiner@stanford.edu | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, john felstiner 660 salvatierra st stanford, CA 94305 |
| EM-2186 | fredawhite@mac.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Freda White 10 Redondo Court Alameda, CA 94501 |
| EM-2187 | breed_twospirit@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Amergin O'Kai 5114 SE Ogden St Portland, OR 97206 |
| EM-2188 | bikofurry@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Karen Ennis 623 Wakerobin Lane San Rafael, CA 94903 |
| EM-2189 | Mikek@rosebudus.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Mike Kappus 2328 12th Ave San Francisco, CA 94116 |
| EM-2190 | fain@rand.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:13:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Terry Fain 703 Ozone Ave Santa Monica, CA 90405 |
| EM-2191 | barkcanoe@earthlink.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, John Lindman 1111 West 10th Ave Spokane, WA 99204 |
| EM-2192 | dpettry@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Deborah Pettry 1736 W. Montecito Way san diego, CA 92103 |
| EM-2193 | tmorris@coxcastle.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Tara Morris 1841 S. SHENANDOAH ST Los Angeles, CA 90035 |
| EM-2194 | agypsyrock@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, allen wall pob 1641 Lucerne, CA 95458 |
| EM-2195 | glenlivit@ca.rr.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Carol Bauer 9757 Sunland Blvd. Shadow Hills, CA 91040 |
| EM-2196 | sharronthomas@selzerrealty.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Sharron Thomas 146 Giorno Ave Ukiah, CA 95482 |
| EM-2197 | montysm@comcast.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, sally montgomery 485 mt. olympus dr sw issaquah, WA 98027 |
| EM-2198 | fginneba@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Fred Ginnebaugh 969G La Mesa Ter Sunnyvale, CA 94086 |
| EM-2199 | sanjivbajaj@charter.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Sanjiv Bajaj "1116 North Louise St., Apt. #3" Glendale, CA 91207 |
| EM-2200 | nicolettesmusic@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Nicolette Holman 8757 Canby Avenue Northridge, CA 91325 |
| EM-2201 | spamonika@charter.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Monika Peters 26573 Ocean View Dr Malibu, CA 90265 |
| EM-2202 | smunday@pacbell.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: STOP! We need our forests, please do not pass the WOPR. I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP). This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Susan Munday 1200 Lakeshore Ave #19F Oakland, CA 94606 |
| EM-2203 | dfirshein@comcast.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, David Firshein 187 Forrest Ave. Fairfax, CA 94930 |
| EM-2204 | cmunrow@earthlink.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Claudia Wornum 55 Genoa Place San Francisco, CA 94133 |
| EM-2205 | ghe34@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Gloria Ellwood 849 N.Harper Av. Los Angeles, CA 90046 |
| EM-2206 | patti_thompson_01@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Patricia Thompson 2181 NW Glisan St Apt 509 Portland, OR 97210 |
| EM-2207 | jillian@firstflight.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Jillian Saxty 839 Oak Street Alameda, CA 94501 |
| EM-2208 | ethanjohnnorris@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Ethan Norris 3311 NW 72nd St Seattle, WA 98117 |
| EM-2209 | joslyn.baxter@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Joslyn Baxter 1424 Grove Street Apt. 2 San Francisco, CA 94117 |
| EM-2210 | robyn@manoneng.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Robyn Rivers 15646 NE 100th Way Redmond, WA 98052 |
| EM-2211 | kaharris79@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Kimberley Harris 5355 Cochran St. #201 Simi Valley, CA 93063 |
| EM-2212 | anarudolph@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Ana Rudolph 351 Mariposa Street Brisbane, CA 94005-1538 |
| EM-2213 | peacemealgarden@msn.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Barbara Bartel 38200 S.E. Coupland Rd.. Estacada, OR 97023 |
| EM-2214 | tturner@earthjustice.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Tom Turner 426 Seventeenth St Sixth Floor Oakland, CA 94612 |
| EM-2215 | geoformer@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, George Reeves 721 Elaine Dr Stockton, CA 95207-4802 |
| EM-2216 | old_grayfox@comcast.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Kenneth Crandall 2712 107th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 |
| EM-2217 | mapolick@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, melissa polick 280 loring mill valley, CA 94941 |
| EM-2218 | Jerryc@pacbell.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:14:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Jerry Clymo 2551 Monarch Pl. Union City, CA 94587-1810 |
| EM-2219 | speirce@greenspeedisp.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, maja silberberg 12749 McCormick valley Village, CA 91607 |
| EM-2220 | renabchiu@verizon.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Rena Chiu 5360 NW Hawk Place Portland, OR 97229 |
| EM-2221 | barbtraveler@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Barbara Byrd 4825 NE 60th Avenue Portland, OR 97218 |
| EM-2222 | Mottman2@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Frank Mott 16852 Coach Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 |
| EM-2223 | maryetta@edmoose.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Mary Etta Moose 1962 Powell St San Francisco, CA 94133 |
| EM-2224 | paul.wilkins@bfcloans.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Paul Wilkins 350 Burchett St #233 Glendale, CA 91203 |
| EM-2225 | erootsmcbride@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Ellen McBride 7077 Enright Drive Citrus Heights, CA 95621 |
| EM-2226 | nigeldent30@hotmail.co.uk | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Nigel Dent 1282A 6th Avenue San Francisco, CA 94122 |
| EM-2227 | inoah@mff.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Ian Noah 5109 Showboat Lane Culver City, CA 90230 |
| EM-2228 | adam@adamgottschalk.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Adam Gottschalk 1470 NE Alberta Street Portland, OR 97211 |
| EM-2229 | juneajunebug@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, June Alexander 745 Racquet Club Circle Rohnert Park, CA 94928 |
| EM-2230 | steve.robey@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Steve Robey 25559 Brookshire Dr castro valley, CA 94552 |
| EM-2231 | judy@axisdance.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Judith A. Smith 2712 Grande Vista Ave Oakland, CA 94601 |
| EM-2232 | sharon@lebowmusic.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Sharon Earle 28220 Matador Place Santa Clarita, CA 91390 |
| EM-2233 | shannon.fouts@alaskaair.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Shannon Fouts S Wright Ave Tacoma, WA 98418 |
| EM-2234 | timtaurus@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. The presence of old-growth forests is what separtates Oregon and Washington. Look at the landscape of Washington's forests. It looks like a patchwork quilt. Please continue your policy of selective cutting. it is better policy. Please do not allow clear cutting. Sincerely, Timothy Curry 369 Maryann Lane Pomona, CA 91767-2833 |
| EM-2235 | lindsay@lauriedavid.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Lindsay Guetschow 1318 16th Street #104 Santa Monica, CA 90404 |
| EM-2236 | leisuregarden@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Brian Johnson 5455 Shafter Avenue Oakland, CA 94618 |
| EM-2237 | Elsparkle1@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Eloise Drew 2013 Garland Ct. Walnut Creek, CA 94595 |
| EM-2238 | d_stayner@hadw.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Don Stayner 3518 Fremont Ave. N. Seattle, WA 98103 |
| EM-2239 | rcberti@msn.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Ron Berti 155 SW 88th Ave Portland, OR 97225 |
| EM-2240 | kfalk@bbllaw.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Karen Falk 12612 2nd Ave S Seattle, WA 98168 |
| EM-2241 | luutersfriend@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, David Rasmussen 8470 Harold Way Los Angeles, CA 90069 |
| EM-2242 | scarrier@earthjustice.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Suzanne Carrier 5359 1/2 Broadway Oakland, CA 94618 |
| EM-2243 | barbara_orr@spe.sony.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:15:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Barbara Orr 19327 Citronia St. Northridge, CA 91324 |
| EM-2244 | bluelynne@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Lynne Preston 638 Rhode island St. San Francisco, CA 94107 |
| EM-2245 | boblich@juno.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Robert Lichtenstein 4223 Gregory Street Oakland, CA 94619 |
| EM-2246 | lgibb@ucla.edu | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Linda Gibboney 16715A Vanowen St. Van Nuys, CA 91406 |
| EM-2247 | ocache@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Otto Cache P.O. Box 711 Tujunga, CA 91043 |
| EM-2248 | jsdavine@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Jill Davine 4047 La Salle Avenue Culver City, CA 90232 |
| EM-2249 | bcollins@earthjustice.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Blair Collins 1016 Norwood Ave. Oakland, CA 94610 |
| EM-2250 | ccasilli@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Christopher Casilli 13230 Fiji Way Unit F Marina del Rey, CA 90292 |
| EM-2251 | RHINO@socal.rr.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Philip Smith 19552 Ditmar Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 |
| EM-2252 | DeesSupport@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Frances Devincenzi 8036 Moreland St. Stockton, CA 95212 |
| EM-2253 | nikitamisha1@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Lori Field Sutton 1000 El Camino Real Atherton, CA 94027 |
| EM-2254 | tami@hbdesign.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Tamara Mathews 1835 SE 59th Ave Portland, OR 97215 |
| EM-2255 | marktwexler@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Mark Wexler PO Box 5638 11650 Garnet Way #2 Auburn, CA 95604 |
| EM-2256 | rrrachel@cruzio.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Rachel Wolf 403 Emeline Avenue Santa Cruz, CA 95060 |
| EM-2257 | adriennekligman@verizon.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Adrienne Kligman 1560 El Verano Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 |
| EM-2258 | kingpatsfan@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Robert Roberto 10746 North Magnolia Ave 8C Santee, CA 92071 |
| EM-2259 | eddie8807@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Eduardo Gonzalez 11542 Willake Street Los Angeles, CA 90670 |
| EM-2260 | gebar@pobox.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Gordon Barrett 13591 Beaumont Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070-4917 |
| EM-2261 | relfalison@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Relf Alison Star 3442 1/2 Padua Ave. Claremont, CA 91711-2059 |
| EM-2262 | sjdean@mac.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Sandra Dean 5654 Broadway Oakland, CA 94618 |
| EM-2263 | pattonpacific@cox.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Md Fein PO Box 15413 Newport Beach, CA 92659 |
| EM-2264 | rcresch@jeffnet.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that will destroy these ancient forests. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Dr. Ruth C, Resch 1000 Terra Ave Ashland, OR 97520 |
| EM-2265 | mglanders@idahova.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Michael Glanders 515 Dee Drive Jerome, ID 83338 |
| EM-2266 | colleen@plazatravel.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Colleen Carter 18139 Erik Ct 258 Canyon Country, CA 91387 |
| EM-2267 | marjanagha@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Marjan Agha P.O. Box 9853 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 |
| EM-2268 | raven2501_2000@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Adrian Villarreal 650 East Bonita Ave APT. 1402 San Dimas, CA 91773 |
| EM-2269 | lisab@humboldt1.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Lisa Butterfield 2440 Wood Street Eureka, CA 95501 |
| EM-2270 | amypierre@wans.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Amy Pierre 138 Monte Cresta Ave Oakland, CA 94611 |
| EM-2271 | Carol@CraftedbyCarol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Carol Wagner 22226 SW 110th Place Tualatin, OR 97062-8158 |
| EM-2272 | johnra0a@comcast.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Richard Johnson 2080 West 25Th Avenue Eugene, OR 97405 |
| EM-2273 | bryan_kelley_1998@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Bryan Kelley 6250 SW Bonita Road F-105 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 |
| EM-2274 | jlseals2001@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Jeanne Seals 11033 Massachusetts Avenue #25 Los Angeles, CA 90025 |
| EM-2275 | cbournellis@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, cindy bournellis 3489 Wine Barrel Way San Jose, CA 95124 |
| EM-2276 | maxcalvillo@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, linda calvillo 1193 stagecoach road frazier park, CA 93225 |
| EM-2277 | riozen@riozen.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:17:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Philip Parker PO BOX 261931 Encino, CA 91426 |
| EM-2278 | drumsm@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Traci Rodriguez 655 Baker St H203 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 |
| EM-2279 | ddolotta@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, David Dolotta 1205 Del Oro Ave Santa Barbara, CA 93109 |
| EM-2280 | jfelton@pwcwire.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Jeff Felton 21756 SW Sherwood Blvd. #158 Sherwood, OR 97140 |
| EM-2281 | kurt@alliedbrokers.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Kurt Klemm 3012 Goodacre Place San Jose, CA 95125 |
| EM-2282 | phil.reser@radiology.ucsf.edu | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Phil Reser 1225 Terra Nova Blvd. Pacifica, CA 94044 |
| EM-2283 | howiecate@igc.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Howard Meyerson 120 Whit's Road Mountain View, CA 94040 |
| EM-2284 | sherriangl@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Please don't do this. Our world needs to protect our forests. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Sherri Pickel 6266 Lee Court Chino, CA 91710 |
| EM-2285 | mikebeilstein@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Mike Beilstein 1214 NW 12th St Corvallis, OR 97330 |
| EM-2286 | petelenhardt@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Peter Lenhardt 562 University Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025 |
| EM-2287 | cynthiaey@aol.com | STRONG Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: URGENT, I am writing in strong opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Cynthia Yandow 25946 Kings Ct Pioneer, CA 95666 |
| EM-2288 | naughton@alum.wellesley.edu | Use Your Head: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Judith Naughton 16593 Ferris Ave Los Gatos, CA 95032-5613 |
| EM-2289 | elainegraybill@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Martha Elaine Graybill 1125 Loma Avenue #121 Coronado, CA 92118 |
| EM-2290 | coastpi@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Chris Scrimiger 1670 Norwich Ave. Cambria, CA 93428 |
| EM-2291 | marti123@mac.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: As an Oregon resident, outdoorsman, biker, and fisherman, I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Destruction of our old-growth forest heritage cannot be our legacy, and the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home must be strengthened, not weakened. Our salmon populations and our own population depend on more intelligent stewardship of our land. Sincerely, Rich Martin 1663 5TH ST Hood River, OR 97031 |
| EM-2292 | starfirechild_2000@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Elizabeth Windham 8633 Lemon Ave, Apt 6 La Mesa, CA 91941 |
| EM-2293 | kenterway@msn.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Richard %pa_first_name% Carolyn Rosenstein 2194 Century Hill Los Angeles, CA 90067-3502 |
| EM-2294 | woicle@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Walt Oicle 627 Harkins Slough rd. Watsonville, CA 95076 |
| EM-2295 | eburke40@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Elizabeth Burke 4000 Derek Dr NE Bremerton, WA 98311 |
| EM-2296 | rolandsalvato@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Roland Salvato 2934 Larkin San Francisco, CA 94109 |
| EM-2297 | BettyLAtw@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Elizabeth Livingston 1518 Austin St Atwater, CA 95301-4505 |
| EM-2298 | stevedowning@cox.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Steve Downing 2316 Edgewater Way Santa Barbara, CA 93109 |
| EM-2299 | raiderman9@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Tom Nash 4313 Gloria Court Rohnert Park, CA 94928-1550 |
| EM-2300 | vrabec1@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, serge vrabec 5902 SE Milwaukie aVe portland, OR 97202 |
| EM-2301 | bardelsing@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, David Bard 3810 Black Forest Lane Yorba Linda, CA 92886 |
| EM-2302 | BLOLSON@IX.NETCOM.COM | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:18:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Brian Olson 953 17th St. Santa Monica, CA 90403 |
| EM-2303 | catstail9nh@netzero.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Elizabeth Hestevold 4401W.VerdugoAve.Apt I catstale9nh@netzero.com Burbank, CA 91505 |
| EM-2304 | lucy@lucyimhome.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Lucy Neale 3525 Alabama St. San Diego, CA 92104 |
| EM-2305 | kate@ddw.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Kathryn Greene 80 Corte TOluca GREENbrae, CA 94904 |
| EM-2306 | mspnutt@juno.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Patricia Nutt 500 Aloha St. Ph403 Seattle, WA 98109 |
| EM-2307 | carlsfrog@mac.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Carl Carter 3164 SE Timberlake Dr Hillsboro, OR 97123 |
| EM-2308 | mjlawler@coinet.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Martha Lawler 52715 Day Road La Pine, OR 97739 |
| EM-2309 | gimpergirl@earthlink.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Jacqueline Ward 240 Kendal Lane Cambria, CA 93428 |
| EM-2310 | lucylanc@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, deborah lancman 3040 brant st. san diego, CA 92103 |
| EM-2311 | alex.caras@greatlakes.nsw.gov.au | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in STRONG opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. THIS PROPOSAL APPEARS TO BE NOTHING MORE THAN A ULTRA RIGHT-WING, NEO-CONSERVATIVE MINDSET THAT HAS NO BASIS IN TODAY'S SOCIETY. IMPORTANTLY, the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. I IMPLORE YOU TO FULLY PROTECT our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. IF YOU IGNORE THIS REQUEST, THEN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY CAN EXPECT TO SPEND THE NEXT 2 TERMS IN THE WILDERNESS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sincerely, Alex Caras 21715 Ulmus Drive Woodland Hills, CA 91364 |
| EM-2312 | suzanne@rhaengineering.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Suzanne Russell 17750 Crown Creek Circle Riverside, CA 92503 |
| EM-2313 | revdaveb@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Dave Bean 4154 Calaroga Circle West Linn, OR 97068 |
| EM-2314 | shelbysmother@comcast.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Vicki Kertz 1985 Brookside Ave. NW Salem, OR 97304 |
| EM-2315 | plarson@sonotech-inc.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Margaret Larson 2457 West Shore Drive Lummi Island, WA 98262 |
| EM-2316 | Barneyla@webtv.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Barney Barney Colby Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90025 |
| EM-2317 | prncsssmrtypnts7@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Sally Klein 1349 n cherokee ave Hollywood, CA 90028 |
| EM-2318 | susangrosen@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Susan Rosen 6247 sunnyslope ave Van Nuys, CA 91401-2411 |
| EM-2319 | fprice@qualcomm.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Faith Price 1418 Peachwood Dr Encinitas, CA 92024 |
| EM-2320 | lingrey@bendbroadband.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:19:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Lin Moore 808 NW 9th St Redmond, OR 97756 |
| EM-2321 | evah@phenxint.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Eva Hofberg 824 W. 15th Street, #27 Newport Beach, CA 92663 |
| EM-2322 | scseer@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging. STOP Sincerely, Sharon Cozzette 5038 Tyler Lane Castro Valley, CA 94546 |
| EM-2323 | petercooper1@cox.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Peter Cooper 444 Sheffield Ave Cardiff, CA 92007 |
| EM-2324 | kellerxcom@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Shelly Keller 2717 Marty Way Sacramento, CA 95818 |
| EM-2325 | drtonil@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: Please protect our forests! I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Toni Leonetti "155 Granada Street, Suite A" Camarillo, CA 93010 |
| EM-2326 | veronica@ladolcev.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, veronica bowers 8050 elphick road sebastopol, CA 95472 |
| EM-2327 | elcapa@earthlink.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Paul Bechtel 734 Cajon Street Redlands, CA 92373 |
| EM-2328 | zappa@cnw.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, marc Daniel 119 e lawrence st mount vernon, WA 98273 |
| EM-2329 | crunyard@msn.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Chris Runyard 3942 S.E. Salmon Street Portland, OR 97214 |
| EM-2330 | g.murrow@earthlink.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Gary Murrow 5524 Johnson Point RD NE Olympia, WA 98516 |
| EM-2331 | Jfromberg@earthlink.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Jeff Fromberg 233 S Barrington Ave Apt 309 Los Angeles, CA 90049 |
| EM-2332 | b_margay@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Bonnie Margay Burke 4378 33rd Place San Diego, CA 92104-1405 |
| EM-2333 | genius5864@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Gail Van 9341 Bennett Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 |
| EM-2334 | chris-jan@att.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, j marbury pob 341 redwood city, CA 94061 |
| EM-2335 | cpowell2@bak.rr.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Cindi Powell 113 Buchanan street Taft, CA 93268 |
| EM-2336 | guthrieschrengohst@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Guthrie Schrengohst Apt . # 125 3022 NE 140th St Seattle, WA 98125 |
| EM-2337 | gegan@ehsd.cccounty.us | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, glenda egan 23 anchorage rd. sausalito, CA 94965 |
| EM-2338 | cc@s-gllp.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Catherine Curtis "212 26th Street, #291" Santa Monica, CA 90402 |
| EM-2339 | ds_mansfield@msn.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Donna Mansfield 215 100th St. SW C208 Everett, WA 98204 |
| EM-2340 | nslaton@calhfa.ca.gov | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Nicole Slaton 5249 El Cemonte Ave Davis, CA 95616 |
| EM-2341 | writeval@pacbell.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Valerie Grant 6131 Glen Oak St. Los Angeles, CA 90068 |
| EM-2342 | terryandjennifer2@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Jennifer Lee 3616 Las Palmas Glendale, CA 91208 |
| EM-2343 | white837@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Michael White 5929 Orange Ave. Long Beach, CA 90805-3530 |
| EM-2344 | daisylind@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, dorothy church 3355 descanso drive los angeles, CA 90026 |
| EM-2345 | annmarie4loans@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:20:21 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Ann-Marie Graham 8146 Chipwood Way Orangevale, CA 95662 |
| EM-2346 | erika@erikae.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, erika Ewers 3819 Dunn Drive Culver City, CA 90232 |
| EM-2347 | markcshaw@usa.net | I Oppose the WOPR | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I vehemently oppose the BLM's attempt to put our forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This is a misguided and unacceptable plan that would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the forests, their diversity of wildlife and the clean waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we will experience resumed logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. This proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Mark Shaw 5176 Miles Ave Oakland, CA 94618 |
| EM-2348 | pathcom@pacbell.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Sheila Irani 3219 Canyon Lake Drive LA, CA 90068 |
| EM-2349 | wolfman@mail2world.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Kristian Kelly 1934 Vale Dr. Redding, CA 96002 |
| EM-2350 | stormcrafted@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, l. tomko 14431 la pluma drive la mirada, CA 90638 |
| EM-2351 | bcrowley@pmc.ucsc.edu | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Brooke Crowley 324 B Ocean View Ave Santa Cruz, CA 95062 |
| EM-2352 | Dancer5940@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: In today's world, it is possible to live almost paper-free. It is not necessary to cut old growth forests. Forests such as these need to be protected, and paper harvested in a sustainable and responsible manner. I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Paula Cosio 4512 Workman Mill Rd D313 Whittier, CA 90601 |
| EM-2353 | jamaker2001@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, janet maker 925 malcolm av los angeles, CA 90024 |
| EM-2354 | luann@renderhaus.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Luann Tribble 75 miramonte dr Moraga, CA 94556 |
| EM-2355 | WhimsicalWarrior@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Amberly Mason 36 Sandview Dr. Bay Point, CA 94565 |
| EM-2356 | caribeno@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Tom Sanchez 2250 Dorris Place Los Angeles, CA 90031 |
| EM-2357 | davinci79@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, R. Gladish 1836 Hunsaker St. Oceanside, CA 92054 |
| EM-2358 | contact@waterfall-gardens.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, susan Tange 7269 Bergman rd. Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 |
| EM-2359 | karen.moreno@avizatechnology.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. This would be a real tragedy if this is allowed to happen! Millions of animals will lose their home and/or be killed and these ancient trees are too valuable to just chop down. We are supposed to be the stewards of this earth, not the destroyers, which is what we have become! Sincerely, karen Moreno 119 Catalpa St Santa Cruz, CA 95062 |
| EM-2360 | deeahnah1945@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Diana Sonne 3628 Linden Ave. N. Seattle, WA 98103 |
| EM-2361 | dalean3@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:21:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Daisy Anderson 945 W. 54th St. Los Angeles, CA 90037 |
| EM-2362 | oregon_tree_hugger@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, cynthia couture 3939 SE 26th Portland, OR 97124 |
| EM-2363 | j.c.ambrozaitis@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, John Ambrozaitis 1097 Barstow Ave Eugene, OR 97404 |
| EM-2364 | herbj@att.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Herb Joseph 3214 Via Alicante La Jolla, CA 92037-2747 |
| EM-2365 | merlinbirdhawk@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, David Burkhart Sunnyside Road Salem, OR 97306-9537 |
| EM-2366 | maritimus49@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Bruce Bennett 1001 Bridgeway #185 Sausalito, CA 94965 |
| EM-2367 | tia@anlf.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Tia Triplett 4073 Bledsoe Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90066 |
| EM-2368 | nesato@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Nancy Sato 2820 Monte Cresta Drive Belmont, CA 94002 |
| EM-2369 | elisaabelleira@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Elisa Abelleira 2831 R Street Eureka, CA 95501 |
| EM-2370 | robinsb@comcast.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Berklee Robins 14071 Chatham Court Lake Oswego, OR 97035 |
| EM-2371 | sjkreider@mac.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Steve Kreider 954 Oak Street San Francisco, CA 94117 |
| EM-2372 | lflores566@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Lydia Flores 8316 North Raisina Avenue Fresno, CA 93720-2083 |
| EM-2373 | tuttlef@comcast.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Frances Tuttle 130 Crestview Drive Orinda, CA 94563 |
| EM-2374 | raymond_gipson@digitalpath.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. 30 year environmental science and biology teacher Sincerely, Mr. %pa_first_name% Mrs. Raymond Gipson 79503 Panoramic Rd. Portola, CA 96122 |
| EM-2375 | marlene.fisher@gamcustom.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Marlene Fisher 550 N. Orlando Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90048 |
| EM-2376 | eewagner@earthlink.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Eric Wagner 5631 Cantaloupe Ave Valley Glen, CA 91401 |
| EM-2377 | tchinnick@davisgrimmpayne.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and totally unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also extremely concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Thank you. Sincerely, Therese Chinnick 14838 206th Ave SE Renton, WA 98059 |
| EM-2378 | mctoby@comcast.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Tom McEachern 40 Hilarita Avenue Mill Valley, CA 94941 |
| EM-2379 | CyrilBouteille@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Cyril %pa_first_name% Ingrid Bouteille 960 Bonita Ave Mountain View, CA 94040 |
| EM-2380 | stanojka14@hotmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, stanojka stuart 6837 deer lane anacortes, WA 98221 |
| EM-2381 | Ejmatchett1@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Eddie Matchett P. O. Box 97 Pinole, CA 94564-0097 |
| EM-2382 | schwartzelizabeth@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:22:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Elizabeth Schwartz 1604 NE Saratoga St. Portland, OR 97211 |
| EM-2383 | schwede@gonzaga.edu | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Carie Schwede 721 S. Lincoln St. #4 Spokane, WA 99204 |
| EM-2384 | MTASJ@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Sherry Marsh 5030 Alicante Way Oceansisde, CA 92056 |
| EM-2385 | MikeFrdman@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Michael Friedman 490 Pebble Drive El Sobrante, CA 94803 |
| EM-2386 | thiswritersturf@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Thank you for considering my comments. Sincerely, Shirley Smith 25115 E. Broadway Ave. Apt. 3 Veneta, OR 97487 |
| EM-2387 | fificosmo@prodigy.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, katrin wiese po box 336 wrightwood, CA 92397 |
| EM-2388 | mmitsuda@earthlink.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Michael Mitsuda 33210 LAKE ONEIDA ST FREMONT, CA 94555 |
| EM-2389 | tbreit82@centurytel.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Teri Breitenbach 832 291st Ave NE Carnation, WA 98014 |
| EM-2390 | MaryKO@aol.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Mary O'Brien 5703 South 320th Street Auburn, WA 98001 |
| EM-2391 | alicia.power@gmail.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Alicia Power 8531 12th Ave Nw Seattle, WA 98117 |
| EM-2392 | clare.lentz@providence.org | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Clare M. Lentz 4800 37Th Ave. S.W. Seattle, WA 98126 |
| EM-2393 | artperez2@juno.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Arsenio Perez 602 Santa Alicia Dr. Rohnert Park, CA 94928 |
| EM-2394 | key4skip@sbcglobal.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Donna Clark 2220 Westmont Dr Alhambra, CA 91803 |
| EM-2395 | patsy@pcdl-usa.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Patsy Martin 478 N. 8th Avenue Upland, CA 91786 |
| EM-2396 | duckturnip@earthlink.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Diana Parsons 7040 Archibald Ave. #29 Alta Loma, CA 91701 |
| EM-2397 | paul.harkness@csueastbay.edu | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Paul Harkness 2880 Kelly Street Hayward, CA 94541 |
| EM-2398 | hopkins1212@yahoo.com | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Cecilia Hopkins 321 Inger Drive C-10 Santa Maria, CA 93454 |
| EM-2399 | nic1@cox.net | Opposition to the WOPR: Protect Our Ancient Forests | 1/7/2008 16:24:25 | Western Oregon Plan Revisions Bureau of Land Management
To whom it may concern: I am writing in opposition to the BLM's attempt to put our nation's beloved forests at-risk through the proposed Western Oregon Plan Revisions (WOPR). This misguided and unacceptable plan would unravel the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) and threaten the magnificent forests, diversity of life, and clean salmon-rich waters of the region. Without the NWFP, we could see a return to logging of ancient forests and the degradation of hundreds of miles of rivers and streams up and down the Pacific coast. This proposal would take us backwards to the days of rampant old growth clear-cutting, destructive road building, and local controversy, and would fail to provide real stewardship of these resources. I urge you to reject this and every attempt to undermine science-based protections for our nation's natural resources. Clear-cutting over 100,000 acres of old-growth forest every decade is simply an unsustainable rate of logging that would destroy these ancient forests. I am also concerned that the proposal fails to appreciate how important these intact forests are in helping to slow global warming. Please do not allow the destruction of our old-growth forest heritage to be our legacy, and rewrite the plan to protect our ancient forests, clean water, and the wildlife that call these areas home. Sincerely, Nick Gaetano 430 Ashton Dr LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 |