pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of jmedethJournal URL: redirect3.cgi?&&auth=0JunTmQgdsHZAAqXhgoVNfOGZEKD2E87iXIxpSQNC&reftype=publisher&artid=1765531&article-id=1765531&iid=140891&issue-id=140891&jid=168&journal-id=168&FROM=Article|Banner&TO=Publisher|Other|N%2FA&rendering-type=normal&&http://jme.bmj.com/
J Med Ethics. 2001 April; 27(Suppl 1): i54–i56.
doi: 10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i54.
PMCID: PMC1765531
Clinical governance—watchword or buzzword?
A. Campbell
Abstract
In the latest reform of the National Health Service great emphasis has been placed on the achievement and maintenance of quality. Mechanisms for ensuring this are being set up under the general title of "clinical governance". What is the meaning of this term? The metaphor behind the phrase is of navigation through stormy seas, but who guides the helmsman? Clinical ethics committees could have a part to play in these changes, provided their role is properly understood. Clinical governance is concerned with management according to an agreed set of aims. The task of ethics committees is Socratic rather than managerial. They should ask fundamental questions about the ethical norms of the services provided and give critical appraisal of the moral character of institutional policies. If these tasks are carried out then governance may become a watchword rather than just another buzzword.

Key Words: Governance • quality • National Health Service (NHS) • ethics committees • Socratic method NHS