pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of heartJournal URL: redirect3.cgi?&&auth=0F91kxatPrLfGSX13dVB-AdNJqUPdhymDHZphm59A&reftype=publisher&artid=1728760&article-id=1728760&iid=139437&issue-id=139437&jid=159&journal-id=159&FROM=Article|Banner&TO=Publisher|Other|N%2FA&rendering-type=normal&&http://heart.bmjjournals.com
Heart. 1998 July; 80(1): 80–85.
PMCID: PMC1728760
New electrocardiographic criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter: correlation with electrophysiological study and radiofrequency catheter ablation
L Lai, J Lin, L Lin, W Chen, Y Ho, Y Tseng, C Chen, Y Lee, W Lien, and S Huang
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei.
Abstract
Objective—To develop new electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters.
Background—Traditionally, the ECG differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters is based on the flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads. However, determination of flutter wave polarity is subjective and sometimes difficult, especially in flutter waves of undulating pattern.
Patients—The study comprised 37 consecutive patients with drug resistant atrial flutter; 30 had counterclockwise and 17 had clockwise atrial flutter (10 had both forms of atrial flutter). The isthmus dependence was confirmed by entrainment study and catheter ablation. The ECG patterns of both types of atrial flutter were compared and the flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads was determined by four independent cardiologists.
Results—The flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads appeared negative in 24, positive in one, and equivocal in five of the counterclockwise atrial flutters; polarity appeared negative in one, positive in 10, and equivocal in six of the clockwise atrial flutters. However, the aVF/lead I flutter wave amplitude ratio was > 2.5 in all counterclockwise but < 2.5 in all clockwise atrial flutters. The flutter wave nadirs in the inferior leads corresponded to the upstrokes in V1 in all counterclockwise atrial flutters, but corresponded to the downstrokes in V1 in all clockwise atrial flutters.
Conclusions—The flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads does not correlate well with the flutter wave rotating direction. However, counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters can be differentiated by new ECG criteria with high accuracy.

Keywords: atrial flutter;  radiofrequency catheter ablation;  electrocardiography
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (202K).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Klein, GJ; Guiraudon, GM; Sharma, AD; Milstein, S. Demonstration of macroreentry and feasibility of operative therapy in the common type of atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 1986 Mar 1;57(8):587–591. [PubMed]
  • Beckman, K; Ta-Lin, H; Krafchek, J; Wyndham, CR. Classic and concealed entrainment of typical and atypical atrial flutter. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1986 Nov;9(6 Pt 1):826–835. [PubMed]
  • Olshansky, B; Okumura, K; Hess, PG; Waldo, AL. Demonstration of an area of slow conduction in human atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Dec;16(7):1639–1648. [PubMed]
  • Cosio, FG; López-Gil, M; Goicolea, A; Arribas, F. Electrophysiologic studies in atrial flutter. Clin Cardiol. 1992 Sep;15(9):667–673. [PubMed]
  • Olshansky, B; Wilber, DJ; Hariman, RJ. Atrial flutter--update on the mechanism and treatment. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Dec;15(12):2308–2335. [PubMed]
  • Waldo, AL. Atrial flutter. New directions in management and mechanism. Circulation. 1990 Mar;81(3):1142–1143. [PubMed]
  • Cosio, FG; López-Gil, M; Goicolea, A; Arribas, F; Barroso, JL. Radiofrequency ablation of the inferior vena cava-tricuspid valve isthmus in common atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 1993 Mar 15;71(8):705–709. [PubMed]
  • Feld, GK; Fleck, RP; Chen, PS; Boyce, K; Bahnson, TD; Stein, JB; Calisi, CM; Ibarra, M. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of human type 1 atrial flutter. Identification of a critical zone in the reentrant circuit by endocardial mapping techniques. Circulation. 1992 Oct;86(4):1233–1240. [PubMed]
  • Chen, SA; Chiang, CE; Wu, TJ; Tai, CT; Lee, SH; Cheng, CC; Chiou, CW; Ueng, KC; Wen, ZC; Chang,, MS. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter: comparison of electrophysiologically guided focal ablation technique and linear ablation technique. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Mar 15;27(4):860–868. [PubMed]
  • Kirkorian, G; Moncada, E; Chevalier, P; Canu, G; Claudel, JP; Bellon, C; Lyon, L; Touboul, P. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter. Efficacy of an anatomically guided approach. Circulation. 1994 Dec;90(6):2804–2814. [PubMed]
  • Cosio, FG; Goicolea, A; López-Gil, M; Arribas, F; Barroso, JL; Chicote, R. Atrial endocardial mapping in the rare form of atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 1990 Sep 15;66(7):715–720. [PubMed]
  • Wells, JL, Jr; MacLean, WA; James, TN; Waldo, AL. Characterization of atrial flutter. Studies in man after open heart surgery using fixed atrial electrodes. Circulation. 1979 Sep;60(3):665–673. [PubMed]
  • Lesh, MD; Kalman, JM. To fumble flutter or tackle "tach"? Toward updated classifiers for atrial tachyarrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 May;7(5):460–466. [PubMed]
  • Saoudi, N; Nair, M; Abdelazziz, A; Poty, H; Daou, A; Anselme, F; Letac, B. Electrocardiographic patterns and results of radiofrequency catheter ablation of clockwise type I atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 Oct;7(10):931–942. [PubMed]
  • Tai, CT; Chen, SA; Chiang, CE; Lee, SH; Ueng, KC; Wen, ZC; Chen, YJ; Yu, WC; Huang, JL; Chiou, CW; Chang, MS. Electrophysiologic characteristics and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with clockwise atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;8(1):24–34. [PubMed]
  • Kalman, JM; Olgin, JE; Saxon, LA; Lee, RJ; Scheinman, MM; Lesh, MD. Electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characterization of atypical atrial flutter in man: use of activation and entrainment mapping and implications for catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997 Feb;8(2):121–144. [PubMed]
  • Ferguson, JJ. American College of Cardiology 45th Annual Scientific Session, Orlando, Florida, March 24 to 27, 1996. Circulation. 1996 Jul 1;94(1):1–5. [PubMed]
  • Ferguson, JJ. American College of Cardiology 45th Annual Scientific Session, Orlando, Florida, March 24 to 27, 1996. Circulation. 1996 Jul 1;94(1):1–5. [PubMed]
Figures and Tables
Figure 1  Figure 1  
Fluoroscopic picture and electrograms during mapping and entrainment study. (A) Position of the Halo catheter in the right atrium (60° left anterior oblique projection). (B) Entrainment study in a patient with counterclockwise atrial flutter. (more ...)
Figure 2  Figure 2  
Twelve lead ECG (left panel; 25 mm/second) and intracardiac electrograms (right panel; 50 mm/second) from (A) patient 19 and (B) patient 5 in table 1. Both had counterclockwise atrial flutter as shown by the Halo catheter (more ...)
Figure 3  Figure 3  
Twelve lead ECG (left panel; 25 mm/second) and intracardiac electrograms (right panel; 50 mm/second) from (A) patient 17 and (B) patient 24 in table 1. Both had clockwise atrial flutter as shown by the Halo catheter study, (more ...)