J. Hoi. Biol. (1961) 3, 71-S The Molecular Structure of Polyadenylic Acid I--- ALEXANDER RICH Department of Biology, 3Iassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MCLSS., U.S.A. DAVID R~A~ES Jational Institute of Mental HeaEth, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A. F. H. cc) `%& Medical Resewch Cou-ncil Unit for Molecular Biology, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, England -. J. D.%ATSO~ Department of Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A. (Received 28 September 1960) The structure of fibers of polyadenylic acid at acid pH has been studied by S-ray diffraction. A model is proposed consisting of two parallel intertwined helical chains, each having a screw of 3.8 .k and 45" and related to each other by a +-ad asis parallel to the fiber axis. Coordinates, bond distances and angles and the calculated Fourier transform are given for this model. Reasons are given why the quite different model of lKorgan & Bear is thought to be wrong. 1. Introduction The isolation of polynucleotide phosphorylase by Grunberg-Manago, Or& & Ochoa (1955) has made possible the synthesis of a variety of ribonucleotide polymers all having the same covalent backbone as natural RNA. Physical and chemical studies on these polymers have been widespread and have led to a better understanding of the general principles underlying nucleic acid structures. Among the first of these poly- mers to be investigated by the technique of X-ray diffraction was polyadenylic acid. In this paper we describe our studies of this material and give the precise coordinates for a molecular model which is in excellent agreement with all the experimental facts. Preliminary accounts of this work have appeared previously (Watson, 1957; Rich, 1957a; Crick, 1957). Since that time additional information has been obtained from the physical chemical investigations of Beers $ Steiner (1957), Fresco & Doty (1957) and Fresco (1959), and the results of these investigations will be incorporated into t.he present discussion. 2. Materials and Methods The polyadenylic acid originally used in this investigation was kindly supplied by S. Ochoa. Later preparations were synthesized by methods already described. A large number of preparations was investigated and the results were very similar in all cases except that some specimens of low molecular weight could not be oriented. Fibers were pulled from concentrated solutions of polyadenylic acid and X-ray diffrac- Con photographs of these fibers were obtained with fiber micro-Gamer=. The humidity of 71 72 -1. RICH, D. R. DAVIES, P. H. C. CRICK AND J. D. WATSOS t IIP lwlium i~tmosphere surrounding the fibers was controlled by bubbling the helium throupll nppropri&c saturated salt solutions befog it entored the camera. Both the micro- focus S-ray t.ube (Hilger, London) and the rotating anode tube which has been developed t&t the (`aventiish Laboratory, Cambridge, were used as high intensity X-ray sources. The intensities of tho diffraction maxima on the photographs were measured with a Joyce- Lo&l recording microdensitomoter. The structural investigation was carried out with the aid of molecular models built from 1% in brass rod to a scale of 5 cm = 1 A. Xodels were built of plausible helical structures ;mtl from these models a set of coordinatee could be obtained for the repeat unit of the hclis. III the early stages the cl&action pattern was obtained using an optical transform machine. Laxer, IBM computers were used to calculate from the coordinates the cylindric- allv a~rsgecl Fourier transform of the model. !&is calculation has been described pre- viously (Davies & Rich, 1959). Comparison between observed and calculnted diffraction patterns was then mado, and from this a decision could be reached as to the acceptability of the model. The coordinates of the fmal model were then r&n4 so that, nil distances anti angles w'cro stereochemically acceptable. 3. Results Well oriented fibers of polyadenylic acid are negatively birefringent with values up to 1)~ = - 0.10. Some less well oriented fibers produced smaller values of the bire- fringence but always of negative sign. Some preparations produced well oriented samples while others yielded poor orientation. The degree of orientation was best, correlated to t,he molecular length of the polymer, and the pH of the material. If the dampie had been prepared near neutral pH, it was very dif%cult to get a well oriented sample; however, lowering the pH usually resulted in a sample with more orient&ion. An S-ray diffraction photograph of polyadenylic acid is shown in Plate I. This is a t.ypical fiber diffraction photograph characterized by a series of off-equatorial streaks rather than a number of discrete spots such ae one would expect for a crystalline material. The diffraction photograph is dominated by a sharp, very intense meridional reflcsion at 340 d on the fourth layer line. The 0rst layer line in the photograph has a spacing of 15.2 & and has a medium to weak reflexion near the meridian; further out there is a moderately strong reflexion at a Bragg spacing of 5.2 A. The latter reflexion .?hows some arcing and is not confined entirely to the first layer line, but merges with a rcflesion on the equator. It is of interest to note that a similar reflexion also occurs in the diffraction pattern of natural ribonucleie acid fibers (Rich & Watson, 1954). The second layer line has nothing while the third layer line has a reflexion which is moderately weal; and is located just off the meridian. Sometimes this layer line can be broken up into two reflexions, one of which is closer to the meridian than the other. The fourth layer line has, in addition to the very intense meridional reflexion, 5~ suggestion of much weaker components which are further away from the meridian nut1 blurred. The fifth layer line has a reftexion of moderate,intensity which is off nx~riclional but arcs across it. 111 aclditiou to the above reflexions which can be seen with untilted fibers, there are two layer line reflesions which can only be seen by tipping the specimens. An example of ~1 tipped diffraction pattern is shown in Plate II. As Can be seen, there are two near- meridional reflesions which occur at G Bragg spacing of 1.90 A and 1.68 .A. It, should Ire uotcd that t.he 140 -1 reflexion is most intense on the meridian while the outer 1 .IjS cl retlesion covers a somewhat wider arc. Difl'r:lction photographs were taken of polyadenylic acid at a variety of relative h~unitliries in order to determine the influence of water on t,he structure. One of the PLATE I. An S-ray diffraction photograph of polyadenylic acid. The fiber axis is vertical and the relative humiditr is 780' The weak reflexion on the meridian just inside the intense 3-8 H arc is 10' due to Ii/3 radiniion. [!I'0 face page i2 PLATE II. An S-rax diffraction photograph of polyadenylic acid obtained with the fiber axis ;erticctl. but tipped about 20" into the beam. Two additional strong reflexions are seen as shown 7~ the arrows. 3IOLECULXR STRUCTURE OF POLYADEXYLIC ACID 73 !Ilost, unusual features of polyadenylic acid is the fact that the diffraction pattern ~~~~tnains intact even if the photograph is taken with the specimen in an evacuated ,.,\nlera nt zero relative humidity, so that almost all the labile water molecules are ,,,~lno\~ed. This stability is in marked contrast to deoxyribonucleic acid and most of the other synthetic polyribonucleotides, in which the diffraction pattern becomes ,~~~~orphous or blurred when the fiber is put in a vacuum. The variations in relative l~umiclity have only a small effect on the equatorial diffraction pattern of polyadenylic ;lcitl. The first reflexion on the equator, 100, is very strong and occurs at a spacing between 16 and 15 ,&. The lOOppacing is shown for polyadenyiic acid as a function of l,elative humidity in Fig. 1, and it can be seen that there is only a small change of less Relotrve humidity (%I Frc:. I. The change in the 100 reflexion with C~ELI.I@E in relative humidity. Zero &ativo hnmidit.y uxs produced by taking the diffraction photograph under vacuum. than :! -$ in this spacing over the whole range of relative humidity. In the two- stranded molecule of polyadenylic acid plus polyuridylio acid, the 100 spacing increases by over S Ai when the relative humidity is changed from near zero to 98% (Rich. l%ib). The reflexions on the equator are not particularly well defined and a degree of un- certainty must be attached to their spacings. They were measured with the Joyce- Loebl recording microdensitometer from twelve films which were the product of 10 *eparate photographs at different relative humidities. In general, only two reflexions could be seen easily, having a spacing of about 1'7 A and about 7.6 A. On several films a reflesion of spacing near S-6 L% could be seen, and on two films a fourth faint reflesion could be observed, but not measured. The first two reflexions may be tentatively indexed as the 100 and 210 reflexions from a square net of spacing 17 8. The third would then correspond to 200 and the fourth to 110. It seems to us most unlikely that these could be the result of diffraction from R hesagonal net, but in view of the paucity of the equatorial reflexions, and the rnthrr diffuse nature of those which are observed, their assignment to a tetragonal cell is not entirely certain. 4. Interpretation of the DiBraction Pattern Thr strong negatire birefringenoe of the fibers of polyadenylic acid suggested that the purine bases are oriented more or lese at right angles to the fiber axis. This inter- p(~tnticm was reinforced by the extremeIy strong meridional reflexion at 3.8 A. 74 A. RICH, D. R. DAVIES, F. H. C. CRICK AND J. D. WATSOS However, since the t.hickness of the purine bases is 3-4 A, it is clear that they must be tilted a little in order to explain the observed 3.8 A axial spacing. The distribution of meridional and off-meridional reflexions clearly suggests that the molecule is helical in character. The simplest helix that is compatible with this dis. tribution would be one in which there are four residues per turn with a pitch of 15.2 A. Accordingly, we spent some time investigating configurations of a variety of single- stranded polyadenylic acid models, since we were at that time uncertain of the dia- meter of the molecule. We tried to find a natural explanation for the 3-8 d reflexion, and in addition to normal stereochemistry, we looked for a reasonable system of hydrogen bonding to hold the structure together. After considerable effort in this direction, we concluded that it was impossible with a single-stranded molecule. Shortly after this we obtained somewhat more reliable data on the equatorial re- flexions of polyadenylic acid which indicated that there was a larger unit cell having an edge about 16 to 17 A long. It was clear that a single strand of polyadenylic acid could not easily 6ll a volume of this sort and accordingly we then began to investigate multi-stranded helical models. In general, there are two different classes of multi-stranded structures: those in which the purine residues are located in the center of the molecule, and those in which they are located on the outside of the molecule. Investigations of the configurations possible in the latter class led us to the conclusion that there were none that were plausible. This point will be discussed in greater detail when we consider the model advanced by Morgan & Bear (1958). Investigation of multi-stranded models with the bases on the inside showed that the ribose-phosphate backbone is not long enough to cover the distance required for a translation of 3.8 A and a rotation of 90" which was indicated by the strong meri- dional reflexion on the 4th layer line. However, two-stranded models can be built with a twofold rotation axis runnin g down the helix axis. The effect of this symmetry axis is to reduce the unit rotation to 45", and within this framework there are two struc- tures in which the adenines of opposite chains are joined together in pairs by hydrogen bonds. In the first of these structures the 6-amino group is hydrogen bonded to N, of the opposite purine ring. Models of this type were rejected by us because they require a large radial separation between phosphates of opposite chains. This would lead to strong reflexions near the meridian on the first layer line, contrary to what is observed. They were examined in more detail by Morgan & Bear (1958), and rejected for similar reasons. The second of these structures has the adenines paired in the same.way as in the crystal structure of adenine hydrochloride (Broomhead, 1948; Co&ran, 1951), namely, with hydrogen bonds between the 6-amino nitrogen and N7 of the opposite ring. A first primitive model of this sort had the bases stacked perpendicular to the helix axis with a separation of 3.8 A, and no attempt was made to pull in the ribose phosphate backbones closer to the axis. The calculated diffraction pattern showed reasonable agreement with the observed pattern, although the intensities of the first layer line reflexions were reversed, the iirst being strong and the second weak. However, at the same time a second model of this kind was constructed in which an additional hydrogen bond was made between the 6-amino nitrogen and a phosphate oxygen of the opposite chain. This additional hydrogen bond meant that the two strands were now held together by two purine-purine hydrogen bonds and two MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF POLYADENYLIC ACID 7: I~~kne-phosphate hydrogen bonds. Formation of this additional hydrogen bond l.esults in pulling in the phosphates closer to the helix axis with consequent improve- lllent of the agreement between the diffraction patterns. Furthermore, in order to ulal;e t.his bond. it is necessary to tip the bases so that they are no longer perpen- dicular to the helis axis; but inclined by 10" to 11" from the perpendicular. This tilting provides a natural explanation for the 34 A spacing rather than the expected rs.4 A spacing. TABLE 1 Coordinates of polyadenylic acid (The atoms listed are those illustrated in Fig. 5) Adenine residue s, Ribose-phosphate chain c', c', C'S C', C'S 0'1 Of* 0'3 P 05 06 0, lower 0', 1.X 3.68 0.35 4.08 64.3" 3.14 3.73 0.46 4.88 49.9" 3.92 2.70 0.35 4.76 34.5" 3.24 1.54 0.11 3.59 25.5' 1.89 1.39 - 0.02 2.35 36.3" I.08 2.52 0.10 2.74 66.7" I.59 0.08 - 0.27 I.59 2.7" 2.80 - 0.50 - 0.27 2.84 - 10*1o 3.81 0.33 - O-05 3.82 4.9" 0.21 2.55 0.01 2.56 94*7O 5.24 o-00 0.00 5.24 o*o" 5.69 o-29 1.44 5.70 2.9" 5.58 - 1.09 2.09 5.69 - 11.0" 6.04 - 2.02 0.98 6.37 - ls*5o 5.51 - 3.45 I.19 6.51 - 32.1" 5.48 - 1.42 -0.21 5.66 F - 14.6' 7.03 0.75 1.48 7.08 6.3" 6.46 - 1.22 3.26 6.58 - 10.7" 3.34 - 4.92 0.89 5.95 - 5iwil" 4.07 - 3.53 1.00 5.39 - 40-g* 1.86 - 4.65 o-90 5.01 - 68.2" 3.89 - 5.91 1.89 7.07 - 56*6O 3.71 - 5.45 - 0.54 6.58 - 55.7" -1 right-handed coordinate system is used for both Cartesian and cylindrical polar coordinates. Furthermore, tilting the bases alters the distribution of scattering intensity on the upper layer lines. If the bases were not tilted we would only expect higher orders of 38 A, e.g. t,he 1.9 X reflexion which is observed as moderately strong (Hate II). However, tilting also throws some diffracted intensity somewhat off the meridian so that we might expect additional reflexions to occur in that region. We have pointed out the occurrence of a second strong reflexion at 1.68 A which, as we will see below, is predicted by this model. By hydrogen-bonding the phosphate group to the adenine residue of the opposite chain, t.he molecule tended to become more rounded in cross section, and the helical 70 -1. RICH. D. R. DAVIES, F. H. C. CRICK AND J. D. WATSOX grooves, which are so marked in DNA, are considerably reduced in polyadenylic acid. This has the effect of reducing the predicted intensity of the second layer line near the meridian so that it is in closer agreement with the observed diffraction pattern. 5. Description of the Molecule Once we were convinced that this model was along the right general lines for pre- dicting the overall diffraction pattern, we carried out a series of successive adjust- ments whereby a careful set of atomic coordinatis was obtained which showed that it is etereochemically feasible to have a model of this sort. Thus, we have a set of atomic Fro. 2. -1 sketch to show the bond angles and distances of polyadenylic mid. Not to scale. coordinates which yield an accepted range of values for bond angles, distances, and van der Weals cont.acts between the atoms. The coordinates for polyadenylic acid are listed in Table 1, t'he bond distances and angles are shown in Fig. 2 (not to scale), and the &rtcr van der Waals contacts are marked on the projection of part of the structure shown in Fig. 3. The coordinates were finalized before the publication of the papers of Fuller (1959) and Spencer (1959). They could be revised slightlyzth advantage but all the dis- tances and angles are acceptable, although the angle N&C$a (106') is strained a little owing to the formation of the hydrogen bond between N,,, and 0,. The adenine has been based on Co&en's parameters for adenine hydrochloride (Co&ran, 1951). 310LECUL.iR STRUCTURE OF POLYADESYLIC ACID 77 The hydrogen bond from N,, to x7 is 6" away from the straight direction and that fi.om N,, to 0, is 14" away-; that is, the angle O,$IoH is 14". This is on the large side, [:llt acceptable. It should be mentioned here that it is necessary in the determination of molecular .trllcture from fiber patterns to show that a given molecular model is stereochemically FIG. 3. Part of the structure projected in the direction of the z axis. The shorter t-an der Waals ,>oilti\cts arc shown b!- tlottrtl lines. FIN. 1. Fchrluntic view of poll-adenylic acid as seen from the side. The flat ribbons represent the ribone-phosphate backbones lrhich are parallel to each other. The disks represent the adenine rings n-hirb arc hydrogen bonded together. feasible, and to present reasonably exact atomic coordinates. Tbis is not because it is necessary to compare in great detail the diffraction pattern of this refined model with what is observed esperimentally, for very often the experimental data on an X-ray 78 A. RICH, D. R. DAVIES, F. H. C. CRICK AXD J. D. WATSOX fiber diffraction pattern are not of high quali L - ty. The importance of presenting exact coordinates rests on the fact that this is a means for ruling out certain structures. It may be very easy to obtain an approximate set of coordinates, but it may prove to he impossible to refine the model properly so that it conforms to known values of atomic parameters as well as have the symmetry demanded by the diffraction pattern. The helical molecule of polyadenylic acid consists of two polynucleotide chains organized about a twofold rotation axis. Figure 4 is a schematic view of the molecule b which the flat ribbons renrc?nmt. t,he rihnnn.nhonnhnte hackhone chains and the disk2 _ =------- ---- ------ =---~~----- -l-__--.-. . FIG. 6. The two-stranded molecule of polyadenylic acid as viewed down the fiber axis. Each adenine residue forms three hydrogen bonds. An extra 0,' atom is shown to indicate the backbone connections. For clarity the hydrogen atoms on the sugar have been omitted. represent the adenine residues. Successive residues are related by a translation of 3.8 A and a rotation of 45". Both backbone chains are parallel to each other, as sho\rq `V arrows. This is in contrast to the two-stranded molecule of deoxyribonucleic acid h which the twofold rotation axes are perpendicular to the fiber axis, and the two back- bone chains are anti-parallel. The adenine rings are tilted about 10" from the hori- zontal, but this is not shown in Fig. 4. Because of the twofold rotation axis, the two bases which are hydrogen bonded to each other are tipped in opposite directi@! much like the blades of a propeller. Figure 5 shows a view of the molecule as seen down the fiber axis, The hydNeD bonding between the adenine residues is shown, aa well as the hydrogen bon&g MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF POLYADENYLIC ACID 79 l,t+ween the adenine amino group and the phosphate oqgen atom Corn the opposite &in. Two arrows point to successive 0, atoms of the ribose ring, and that atom is 5110wn twice in order to show how the backbone chain is connected. Nitrogen 1 of the :,&nine ring is protonated, with a positive charge on the ring. The reasons for this will be discussed below. 111 order to see the molecule in terms of the space which it occupies, we have made ;1 diagram in which the atoms are represented as spheres drawn with their van der \\`aals radii. Figure 6 shows this view of the molecule. The fiber and molecular axis is Polyadtnylic acid Adcninc 0 Ribosc carbon 0 Oxygen a Phosphorus FIG. ti. \`an der Waals model of polyadenylh acid. Hydrogen atoms am not represented in this Jin,oram. ~mtical, and it can be seen that the adenine b&s are slightly tilted. The outstanding feature which this diagram illustrates is the compactness of the molecule. The mole- cule is a helix, but the helical grooves are not very evident owing to the fact that the 1)hosphate groups are pulled in towards the center of the molecnle in order to hydra- gen-bond with the adenine amino group. This compact form is probably responsible for the faot that the helix is intact even under a vacuum. In addition, the rounded outline is probably responsible for random- ness in packing, as discussed below. so A. RICH, D. R. DAVIES, F. H. C. CRICK AKD J. D. WATSON 6. The Density and Space Group of Polyadenylic Acid To obtain an approximate estimate of the density to be expected we must estimate the number of mater molecules that will fit into the unit cell. This can be done approxi- mately by using the partial specific volume of polyadenylic acid in solution, which is known to be in the neighbourhood of 064 (R. Haselkorn, personal communication). If we t,ake a tetragonal cell with dimensions 16% x 16-S x 15-2 & then calculation shows that there should be room for about eight molecules of water per nucleotide. This gives a densit,y of about 1.47. If the fiber used contained a small amount of sodium ion (which occupies very little volume) this figure might be a little higher, say 1.5. This is rather lower than the observed value of I.53 obtained by flotation. This dis- crepancy can only be explained by assuming that in the fiber there were less crystalline regions with a higher density. As the postulated tetragonal cell is a very open one this is not implausible. In spite of these uncertainties the density shows clearly t,hat there are two nucleo- tides for every 3.8 x in the z direction, since three nucleotides would be an impossibly tight fit (calculated density 1.70) and one nucleotide would give far too low a density (calculated 1.23). The molecule of polyadenylic acid in the helical form described has a great deal of symmetry. In addition to the twofold rotation axis along the helix axis, there is also an eightfold screw axis, which can be used crystallographically as a fourfold screw axis. Hence the space group may well be P4, where a c-axis is 15.2 a and the asym- metric unit consists of two adjoining nucleotides. The helix is covalently linked in a right-handed fashion but this is not specified by the space group symmetry. 7. Comparison of Calculated and Observed Intensity Data From the final set of coordinates the continuous Fourier transform was calculated using the computer program already mentioned. This program computes a cylindric- ally averaged Fourier t,ransform for helical molecules. This is the most appropriate form of comparison to be used for polyadenylic acid since there is little evidence for crystallinity or sampling of the transform with one or two exceptions cited above. The program computes the cylindrically averaged intensity I(R, Z/c), where I(R,I/c) =~{~`Jn(2nqR)~os~(;-+,)+~}]~ + ~$.Jn(?m;R)Sill(n(~-#j) +?}I*} where j = total number of atoms in the asymmetric unit; rj, $, and z, are the cylin- drical polar atom coordinates, n = order of Bessel functions suitable for the helical symmetry. We have used four orders of Bessel function for each layer line; additional contributions could be neglected. In this computation we have not used a temperatm factor. Intensity data were collected from diffraction photographs obtained with the, multiple film technique. The intensities of the diffraction maxima were measured wit\ the recording microdensitometer by taking traces which went at right angles to the;' layer lines as well as along t.hem. This was done because, as a result of the lack O{ MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF POLYADENYLIC ACID 81 (Son$ete orientation of the fiber molecules, many of the reflexions were arced, with ;Ippreciable intensity off the layer lines. Because of this arcing of the re%eions, and Irecause of the limited integrating ability of the recording densitometer, we regard the intensity data obtained as only semi-quantitative. We have, therefore, not Laonsidered it worthwhile to correct the recorded intensities for the usual cyli&-ical & polarization factors. These corrections, if applied, would have the principal efect of reducing the recorded intensities near the meridian. It was possible to measure the relative intensities of the two reflexions which occur ilt 1438 $ and 1.90 A, but no attempt ha.4 been made to relate these accurately to the rest of the diffraction pattern. Rti-`) FIG. i. The observed and calculated intensities for polyadenylio acid. The cmlculeted intensities are indicated by the continuous curves. The observed data are plotted in the shaded areas, the apex indicating the position of maximum intensity. The height of the apex indicatea intensity, but the measurements may be in error by as much as 50%. The observed reflexions on layer lines 8 and 9 are not on the same scale as the other observed intensities. plot.ted at one-fifth the actual values. *Intensities on this layer line are The observed and calculated intensities on the various layer lines are shown in Fig. 7. It can be seen that there is moderately good but not perfect agreement. Note particularly t.hat the model predicts strong intensity at a spacing of l-90 A (second order of 3.8 +i) as well as a strong reflexion at 1.68 B which should be just off the meri- dian. This latter reflexion which can be seen in Plate II has an intensity distribution compatible with its being off-meridional. The observed intensity data are plotted in Fig. 7 in such a way as to indicate its semi-quantitative nature. The most intense part of the diffracted intensity on a layer line was located by projecting the diffraction pattern onto an appropriate Bernal chart. Tllis point was used to determine the position of the apex of the pentagonal G 8'1 -4. RICH, D. R. DAVIES, F. H. C. CRICK AND J. D. WATSON shaded areas which indicate observed intensity. This could be done unambiguously in most cases. However, the medium intense reflexion on the 5th layer line never split into its two off-meridional components. Hence ita position on the layer line wa determined by assuming that the arc originated on that layer line; this uniquely determines the cylindrical radius R for the reflexion. The same technique was used for the 9th layer line reflexion. The height of the shaded intensity figure was determined by the densitometer tracings, while the width was estimated using both the tracings and visual appraisal. The straight edges on the pentagonal intensity @n-es do not, of course, represent the shape of the diffraoted X-ray beams. In Fig. 7, the observed and calculated intensities for the 4th layer line (3.8 A) are plotted on a scale O-2 times that of the rest of the diagram, as indicated by an asterisk. Only the outermost equatorial re0exions are plotted in Fig. 7, since the inner reflexions are discrete and are handled separately. F 0 0.04 0.08 0.12 O.l6 0.20 R tk', FIG. 8. Observed and calculated structure faotom for the equator of polyadenylic acid. The dashed line represents the structure fa&or for the molecule minus the struoture faotor for a cylinder of mater. The observed date are hdi08ti by vertical linm which cross the horizontal axis. The positions of the reflexions at extreme vslues of the relative humidity am indicated by short vertical lines. When considering the agreement between the observed and calculated intensity diskibutions in Fig. 7 it should be emphasized that no allowance has been made for the effect of bound water molecules on the diffraction pattern. Polyadenylic acid takes up a small amount of water and holda it Grmly, and it is quite likely that this -. water will modify the diffraction pattern slightly. The water surrounding the molecule may have a substantial effect on the equatorial diffraction pattern. We have accordingly computed the equatorial intensities by,; taking this water environment into account. This calculation was catied out by assuming that the molecule is cylindrical in outline (cf. I!& 6), with an outer radius'; r,, and is suspended in a sea of water which extends from r, to infinity. The equated intensities or structure factors are then the difference between the contribution due t6" the molecule itself and that due to a cylinder of water of radius r,,. Thus, for tb: equator we have plotted in Fig. 8 the structure &&or for the molecule itself, th<' cylinder of water and the difference betwe$;n these quantities (dashed line). That is:! MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF POLYADENYLIC ACID P = F (poly A) - F (water cylinder) 83 ,, here E = height of the cylinder of water (34 A for 2 nucleotides); p = electron density of water = 0.33 electronslA3; r. = 7.5 A. It can be seen that the structure factor passes through zero very near the pint at ,\hich the 110 reflexion should appear in the square lattice. Hence this accounts for the failure to observe this reflexion. The fact that 210 reflexion is readily observed ,Vliereas 200 is frequently very weak may be partially, but not entirely, accounted for by the higher multiplicity of 210. Observed data are plotted in Fig. 8 for the rcflexions 100,200 and 210 at 20% and 9So/o relative humidity. These structure factor ,iiea.surements should be regarded as accurate only to approximately f 30%, due to tlic diffuseness of the reflexions. However, it can be seen that there is rough agreement l&k the calculated structure factor curve. The diffuseness of these equatorial reflexions may arise from several sources. It is quite likely that the molecules tend to crystallize in the tetragonal cell because of the 4~" rotation between adjoining nucleotide residues in the chain. However, there are cpportunities for various types of randomness. The chains are directional, and so they can be oriented up and down at random. In addition, because the helix is very com- pact and rounded, rotational disorder can be present. These may have the effect of ljroducing an equatorial packing domain which is small, and leads to broad diffuse equatorial reflexions. This randomness is also responsible for the smeared, non- discrete nature of the off-equatorial reflexions, which come closer to representing the continuous Fourier transform than a sampling at discrete points. We have spent aome time studying the packing between molecules m the tetragonal lattice at various equatorial spacings. There are several possibilities, but we shall not discuss them because the di.Eraction data are not sufficiently precise. 8. The Model of Morgan & Bear A paper was recently published by Morgan & Bear (1958) which described two possible structures for the molecule of polyadenylic acid. We believe both of these structures to be incorrect. Since these authors reject their second StNCtUre on the grounds that it does not fit the diffraction data, we need not consider it further here. Their structure I is very unusual in that the two polynucleotide chains are wrapped around each other in anti-parallel fashion with each chain containing four residues per turn. The ribose-phosphate chains are located in the center of the molecule with the adenine residues projecting out radially from the center core. The two chains are related by dyad axes, perpendicular to the fiber axis, going through each pair of hydrogen- bonded ribose rings. Although it has some provocative features, this model can be ruled out for several reasons which we shall proceed to outline. In the first place it is not clear to us that the structure can be built satisfactorily along the lines the authors have described. Whereas most of the bond distrtnces in their model are acceptable, many of the angles are not. In Table 2 we list the bond angles that occur in their structure together with the standard values. It can be seen that distortions are present as large aa 20" to 30", and these are quite unallowable. Furthermore, the authors have neglected to consider some of the unfavorable van der s4 -1. RICH. D. R. DAVIES, F. H. C. CRICK AND J. D. WATSOS \Ynals contacts bet,ween various units. Thus, they have the two charged phosphate groups "in contact" with each other. However, the phosphorus atoms are 3.89 A apart and the oxygen8 are 246 L% apart, both of these values being considerably below the accepted values. We think it is unlikely that these coordinates can be refined tc standard values. This is probably an example of the situation discussed above, in that a preliminary and uncritical examination of a potential molecular configuration looks promising but, on closer examination, it turns out that the model is not feasible stereochemically. TABLE 2 Bond angles in the model of Morgan & Bear Angle Vnlue in structure I Standard value Distortion O,`C,`C, S,C,`O,' C,`C,`O,' C,`C,`O?' PO,`C, O,`PO, 139" 132' 124" 120" 102" 77" lloO 110" 110o 110" about 120' 110" 29" 22" 14O 9" about 18" 33" Secondly, the structure looks energetically unfavorable. It is held together by one weak hydrogen bond between the sugars, and furthermore, the negatively charged phosphate groups are brought close together so that the molecule would tend to fly apart in solution, whereas it has been shown experimentally by Fresco (1959) that 1. polyadenylic acid retains its helical cotiguration in solution. It has been established by Fresco & Doty (1957) that the helical form of poly" adenylic acid is stable at pH 5, but not at pH 7. The atructnre of Morgan $ Bear does" not explain this. Nor does it explain in a natural way the spacing of 3.8 A between the bases. Further support for models having the bases on the inside arises from chemical work concerning the action of concentrated nitrous acid on the adenine residue in ribonucleotide chains. In 4 M-NaNO, at pH 4.3 adenine residues are usually oxidized: to hypoxanthine, since the amino group is replaced by an oxygen. However, poly-,,. adenylic acid does not react under these conditions when left at room temperature for_ four days. (A. Bendich & H. Rosenkranz, personal communication.) This result:; nould not be understandable if the adenine residues project away from the molecular&, ask into the solution; however, it is naturally explained by the fact that the adenintC:' residues are buried in the center of the molecule and are hence unreactive to nitrouri- acid. Finally, it should be mentioned that a cylindrically averaged transform calculati$i carried out with the Morgan-Bear coordinates does not yield a diffraction pattern in;. agreement with the observed data. The second strongest reflexion on the calculas pattern is on the 3rd layer line, while the near-meridional part of the 2nd layer @& is more intense than the contribution further out. In short, we'feel there is very litgtl chance that this model is correct. MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF POLYADEXYLIC ACID 85 9. Discussion We arrived at our interpretation for the structure of polyadenylic acid before the effect of hydrogen ion concentration was noted. Beers & Steiner (1957) pointed out that an abrupt shift occurred in the ultraviolet absorption spectrum of polyadenylic acid -when the pH was lowered to about pH 5. They correlated the shift in the spectrum with the absorption of one proton per nucleotide base. Shortly after that, Fresco & Doty (1957) showed that, at the lowered pH, the molecule had a rigid form composed of variable numbers of polyadenylic acid molecules in contrast to the flexible ran- domly coiled form which it exhibited at pH 7. Thus we were faced with the question of how the additional proton was absorbed in polyadenylic acid. The answer to this question is quite clear in the case of adenine hydrochloride in crystalline form. Co&ran (1951) has made a detailed analysis of the crystal structure of the protonated adenine residue and his results show that the additional hydrogen is located on N1 of the purine ring. We therefore considered the effects of adding a proton at this position on the structure which we had postulated for polyadenylic acid. The results are shown in Fig. 5 where a positive charge is shown on N1 in close proximity to the negatively charged phosphate group of the opposite ribose-phosphate backbone. In this position it is clear that the additional charge on the adenine residue stabilizes the molecule electrostatically. This might be described as an "inner salt," since the polymer no longer has an overall cha,rge, even though there are isolated charges on different parts of the helix. In this form the molecule has considerable stability. It haa been shown by Fresco S; Klemperer (1959) that the "melting temperature," T, (the mean of the tempera- t.ure ra.nge over which the material changes from a helical to a random coil form) of a soIution of polyadenylic acid at pH 4-25 and ionic strength 0.15 is about 90oC. This is roughly the same as the T,,, of calf thymus DNA at pH 7-O and similar ionic strength, and is considerably higher than the Tm's of polyinosinic acid, polyinosinic plus poly- cytidylic acid and polyadenylic p&z polyuridylic acid (Doty, Boedtker, Fresco, Haselkorn & Litt, 1959). Polyadenylio acid, in addition to combining with itself to form this two-stranded molecule, can also combine with polyuridylic acid to form two- and three-stranded structures (Rich & Davies, 1956; Felsenfeld, Davies & Rich, 1957). Similar structures are formed with polyinosinic acid (Rich, 1957u) and with polyribothymidylic acid (A. Rich, unpublished results). It should be noted that these structures are all formed at neutral pH where polyadenylic acid exists as a flexible single chain. All of these structures exhibit diffraction patterns that are quite different from that shown in Plate I. However they all have in common a configuration in which the charged ribose-phosphate chains are helically arranged on the outside of the molecule sur- rounding the hydrogen bonded purine or pyrimidine residues. We would like t.o ecknomledge assistance by Leslie Barnett, and also by Dr. S. Benzer in obtaining the final coordix~ates. REFERENCES Beers, R. F., Jr. $ Steiner, R. F. (1957). Nutwe, 179, 1076. Broomhead, J. (1948). A& Cryst. 1, 324. cochran, w. (1951). Acta cqst. 4, 81. S6 A. RICH, D. R. DAVIES, F. H. C. CRICK AND J. D. WATSON Crick, F. H. C. (1955). In Cellular Biology, Nu&io Acid.~ and Viruses, Special Publicatioa` of the New Yosk Academy of Sciences, V, p. 173. Davies, D. R. & Rich, A. (1959). Acta Cry&. 14, 97. Doty, P., Boedtker, H., Fresco, J. R., Haselkorn, R. & Litt, M. (1959). Proc. Nat. Aw, sci., Wash. 45, 482. Felsenfeld, G., Davies, D. R. & Rich, A. (1957). J. Amt. Chm~ Sot. 79, 2023. Fresco, J. R. (1959). J. Mol. Biol. 1, 100. Fresco, J. R. & Doty. P. (1957). J. Amer. Chem. Sot. 79, 3928. Fresco, J. R. & Klemperer, E. (1969). Ann. N.Y. Ad. Sci. 81, 730. Fuller, W. (1959). J. Phy-9. Chm.~ 63, 1705. . Gnmberg-Manago, M., Ortiz, P. J. & Ochoa, S. (1965). &&ace, 122, 907. Morgan, R. S. & Bear, R. S. (1968). S&nee, 127, 80. Rich, A. (1957a). In Cellular Biology, Nucleic A& and Vi'irusee, Special Publication of : the New York Academy of Sciences, V, p. 186. -Y Rich, A. (19576). In Chenaieal Bat& of Heredity, ed. by W. D. McElroy t B. Glass, p. 567;: Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press. Rich, A. d: Davies, D. R. (1956). J. Amer. Chem. Sot. 78, 3648. Rich, A. & Watson, J. D. (1964). Pwc. Nat. Acud. Sci., Woeh. 40, 769. Spencer, 11. (1959). Acta Cry8t. 12, 59 and 66. Watson, J. D. (1957). In The Chekcd B&of Heredity, ed. by W. D. McElroy & B. G%Aa p. 505. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.