NPP Grassland: Tuva, Russia, 1978-1985

Summary:

Climate data for this site are also available: see Any Other Relevant Information in section 11 of this document.

More information on the entire Net Primary Production Project can be found at the NPP homepage.

Table of Contents

1. Data Set Overview
   
2. Investigator(s)
   
3. Theory of Measurements
   
4. Equipment
   
5. Data Acquisition Methods
   
6. Observations
   
7. Data Description
   
8. Data Organization
   
9. Data Manipulations
   
10. Errors
    
11. Notes
    
12. Application of the Data Set
    
13. Future Modifications and Plans
    
14. Software
    
15. Data Access
    
16. Output Products and Availability
    
17. References
    
18. Glossary of Terms
    
19. List of Acronyms
    
20. Document Information
    

1. Data Set Overview:

Data Set Identification:

Introduction:

Objective/Purpose:

Summary of Parameters:

1. Site

2. Treatment

3. Year

4. Month

5. Day

6. Date in decimal year

7. Above ground biomass

8. Standing dead

9. Litter

10. Above ground total matter

11. Below ground dead

12. Below ground total matter

13. Above ground net primary production (calculated)

14. Cumulative above ground net primary production (calculated)

Discussion:

Related Data Sets:

2. Investigator(s):

Investigator(s) Name and Title:

Title of Investigation:

Contact Information:

c/o Department of Rangeland Resources
Utah State University
Logan, Utah 84322-5230
USA
Telephone Number: +1 (801) 797-2578/2471
Fax: Not Currently Available
Email Address: Tagir_Gilmanov@sdstate.edu

3. Theory of Measurements:

Peak above-ground live biomass (or in some cases, the difference between maximum and minimum biomass) has been used as an estimate of net primary production - usually where only one or two measurements per year are available. Sometimes a conversion factor has been applied to take account of estimated turnover and the estimated ratio of above-ground to below-ground dry matter.

The "IBP Standard Method" of Milner and Hughes (1968) assumes that where live biomass increases between successive samples, production equals this increase; where biomass decreases or remains the same, production is assumed to be zero. Annual production is then obtained by summing the estimates for each sample interval.

Essentially, this method was used for the IBP synthesis by Singh and Joshi (1979), in particular for their estimates of below-ground production. A modified method was used for above-ground production, determined by a decision matrix (Singh et al., 1975); where increments in live biomass coincided with increases in standing dead matter, the latter were added to the monthly production.

The limitations of the above methods are discussed in detail by Long et al. (1989). In particular, the peak biomass method and variations on the IBP method underestimate production by not accounting for simultaneous growth and death. This may be significant in temperate grasslands with a long growing season, and is particularly a problem in tropical grasslands where the growing season may extend over much of the year. Some limited overestimation may occur by not accounting for periods of negative NPP (due to stress, or translocation between above and below ground plant parts) but underestimation of root turnover is probably the largest source of error. Long et al. (1989) estimated NPP for three terrestrial tropical grassland sites by summing monthly changes in live biomass plus losses due to death and decomposition for above and below ground vegetation. Monthly losses were determined as the change in dead matter plus the estimated disappearance of dead matter through decomposition. Dead matter disappearance was calculated each month as the product of relative decomposition rate and mean amount of dead matter.

Although some correlation between estimates obtained using different methods has been reported (Singh et al., 1975), the degree of underestimation may be strongly site-specific (Linthurst and Reimold, 1978; Long and Mason, 1983). Where sufficient data are available for a given grassland site, it may be possible to estimate NPP according to the different methods for the purposes of comparison. This may involve entry of data into algorithms or a spreadsheet containing these algorithms.

Methodological aspects of field experimental studies of biomass and production of grassland ecosystems in the Commonwealth of Independent States (former USSR) were summarized by Titlyanova (1988). The methods of field measurements of above-ground and below-ground biomass in Russian grasslands are based on the harvest technique and with respect to sampling area, replication, etc., are very close to the methods used by western ecologists during the IBP studies (e.g. Milner and Hughes, 1968; Sims and Coupland, 1979). The Russian approach to estimation of the annual production of grassland plant communities (with subdivision on aboveground and belowground components) is based on a calculation procedure utilizing data of repeated (usually 2-weekly) sampling during the season of live, standing dead and litter fractions of phytomass. This method of calculation gives the estimates of production which are 1.6 to 2.0 times higher than the seasonal maximum of the standing crop of the corresponding phytomass fraction (Titlyanova, 1988).

4. Equipment:

Sensor/Instrument Description:

• soil corer
• quadrat sampling frame
• laboratory balance

Collection Environment:

Platform/Source:

Platform/Source Mission Objectives:

Key Variables:

Principles of Operation:

Sensor/Instrument Measurement Geometry:

Manufacturer of Sensor/Instrument:

Calibration:

5. Data Acquisition Methods:

6. Observations:

Data/Field Notes:

site elevation (m): 800

mean annual precipitation (mm): 214

mean monthly min temperature (C): -39.2 (Jan)

mean monthly maximum temperature (C): 26.7 (July)

vegetation type: ultra-continental steppe

dominant species: Agropyron crystatum (C3 photosynthetic types)

historical long-term management regime (estimated): annual grazing

maximum aboveground live biomass (typical month): 103 g/m2 (July)

soil type: haplustosol/calciustosol

soil pH: 7.3

soil texture (sand/silt/clay): 0.74/ 0.17/ 0.09

soil carbon content: 4030 g/m2 (0-20 cm)

soil nitrogen content: 430 g/m2 (0-20 cm)

7. Data Description:

Spatial Characteristics:

Spatial Coverage:

Spatial Coverage Map:

Spatial Resolution:

Projection:

Grid Description:

Temporal Characteristics:

Temporal Coverage:

Temporal Coverage Map:

Temporal Resolution:

Data Description:

There are fifteen (15) parameters for this dataset. Items 1-2 refer to the site and the treatments, respectively. Minimum and maximum values for the remaining parameters are for the combined treatments.

1.
variable=Site
definition=site where data were gathered
code=tva: Tuva

2.
variable=Treatmt
definition=long term management of site
code=lngtrm: annual grazing

3.
variable=Year
definition=year in which data were collected
units=year
minimum=1978
maximum=1985

4.
variable=Mn
definition=month in which data were collected
units=month
minimum=01
maximum=12

5.
variable=Dy
definition=day in which data were collected
units=day
minimum=05
maximum=31

6.
variable=Tyear
definition=Date in decimal year
units=year plus the Julian date divided by 365
minimum=1978.370
maximum=1985.660

7.
variable=AGbiomass
definition=Above ground live biomass
units=[g][m^-2]
minimum=5
maximum=162

8.
variable=Stdead
definition=Standing dead
units=[g][m^-2]
minimum=10
maximum=95

9.
variable=litter
definition=dead biomass found above ground
units=[g][m^-2]
minimum=8
maximum=130

10.
variable=AGtotmatter
definition=above ground total matter
units=[g][m^-2]
minimum=63
maximum=265

11.
variable=BGbiomass
definition=Below ground biomass
units=[g][m^-2]
minimum=495.0
maximum=738.0

12.
variable=BGdead
definition=Below ground dead
units=[g][m^-2]
minimum=*
maximum=*

13.
variable=BGtotmatter
definition=below ground total matter
units=[g][m^-2]
minimum=*
maximum=*

14.
variable=ANPP
definition=Above ground net primary production
units=[g][m^-2]
minimum=*
maximum=*

15.
variable=CUMANPP
definition=Cumulative above ground net primary production
units=[g][m^-2]
minimum=0
maximum=224.0

* Results not available. Parameter included for format consistency with other NPP datasets.

Sample Data Record:

Site   Treatmt   Year    Mn   Dy   Tyear     AGbiomass    Stdead     litter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
tva    lngtrm    1978    05   15   1978.370  10.0         80.0       130.0

AGtotmatter    BGbiomass    BGdead    BGtotmatter   ANPP    CUMANPP
--------------------------------------------------------------------
220.0          -999.9       -999.9    -999.9        -999.9  91.0

8. Data Organization:

Data Granularity:

1. Data File tva_npp.txt 3.2 KBytes
Period: 15 May 1978 through 30 Aug 1985
Latitude: 51.83N, Longitude: 94.42E

A general description of data granularity as it applies to the IMS appears in the EOSDIS Glossary.

Data Format:

Site;Treatmt;Year;Mn;Dy;Tyear;AGbiomass;Stdead;litter;AGtotmatter;BGbiomass;BGdead;
BGtotmatter;ANPP;CUMANPP [units g/m2]

tva;lngtrm  ;1978;05;15;1978.370;  10.0;  80.0; 130.0; 220.0;-999.9;-999.9;-999.9;-999.9;  91.0
tva;lngtrm  ;1978;06;07;1978.430; 101.0;  60.0; 104.0; 265.0;-999.9;-999.9;-999.9;-999.9;  91.0

9. Data Manipulations:

Formulae:

Derivation Techniques and Algorithms:

Data Processing Sequence:

Calculations

Graphs and Plots

10. Errors:

11. Notes:

Limitations of the Data:

Known Problems with the Data:

Usage Guidance:

12. Application of the Data Set:

13. Future Modifications and Plans:

14. Software:

Software Description:

Software Access:

15. Data Access:

Contact Information:

Telephone: +1 (865) 241-3952
Email Address: ornldaac@ornl.gov

Data Center Identification:

Telephone: +1 (865) 241-3952
Email Address: ornldaac@ornl.gov

Procedures for Obtaining Data:

Data Center Status/Plans:

16. Output Products and Availability:

17. References:

Gorshkova, A.A., ed. (1982) Steppe vegetation of Siberia and some features of its ecology. Nauka, Novosibirsk. 134 pp.

Gorshkova, A.A. (1986) Steppe grazing lands of Siberia and their rational use. In: Productivity of haymows and pastures (Titlyanova, A.A., ed.). Nauka, Novosibirsk. pp. 123-129. (In Russian).

Gorshkova, A. A., and I. V. Stebayev. 1982. Net Primary Production for Tuva (Russia) Grassland Site Dataset, In Gorshkova, A.A., ed. (1982) Steppe vegetation of Siberia and some features of its ecology. Nauka, Novosibirsk. 134 pp.

Linthurst, R. and R.J. Reimold (1978) An evaluation of methods for estimating the net primary production of estuarine angiosperms. J. Applied Ecology 15, 919-932.

Long, S.P. and Mason, C.F. (1983) Saltmarsh Ecology. Blackie, Glasgow.

Long, S.P., E. Garcia Moya, S.K. Imbamba, A. Kamnalrut, M.T.F. Piedade, J.M.O. Scurlock, Y.K. Shen and D.O. Hall (1989) Primary productivity of natural grass ecosystems of the tropics: a reappraisal. Plant and Soil 115, 155-166.

Milner, C. and R.E. Hughes (1968) Methods for the Measurement of the Primary Production of Grassland. IBP Handbook No.6. Blackwell, Oxford.

Nosin, V.A. (1963) The soils of Tuva. Academy of Sci. Publ. House, Moscow. 342 pp. (In Russian).

Sims, P.L. and R.T. Coupland (1979) Producers. In: Grassland ecosystems of the world: analysis of grassland and their uses (ed. R.T. Coupland). Cambridge University Press. pp. 49-72.

Singh, J.S. and M.C. Joshi (1979) Tropical grasslands primary production. IN: Grassland Ecosystems of the World (R.T. Coupland, ed.) Cambridge University Press. pp. 197-218.

Singh, J.S., W.K. Lauenroth and R.K. Sernhorst (1975) Review and assessment of various techniques for estimating net aerial primary production in grasslands from harvest data. Botanical Review 41, 181-232.

Stebayev, I.V., N.N. Naplyekova and A.B. Gukasyan (1964) Locusta (Acrididae) and black beetles (Tenebrionidae) as stimulators of microbiological processes in soils of dry steppes of the Tuva autonomous republic. Pochvovedenie 9, 89-95. (In Russian).

Stebayev, I.V. (1976) Spatial structure of the animal population and of the biogeocoenoses in the transit geochemical series of landscapes. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 55, 191-204. (In Russian).

Stebayev, I.V. (1986) Ecology of the castanean soils and their zoological complexes in the north-eastern part of the Ubsunur basin. In: Information problems of studying the biosphere. Experiment Ubsu-Nur, Pushchino, pp.16-49. (In Russian).

Stebayev I.V. and L.B. Pshenicyna (1984) Possibilities of studying the trophic specialization of locusts (Orthoptera, Acrididae) based on the analysis of excrement. Entomologicheskoe obozrenie, 12, 433-446. (In Russian).

Titlyanova A.A., V.I. Kiryushin, I.P. Okhin'ko et al. (1984) Agrocoenoses of the steppe zone. Nauka, Novosibirsk. 247 pp. (In Russian).

Titlyanova, A.A. (1988) Methodology and methods of studying of the production-destruction processes in herbaceous ecosystems, In: Biologicheskaya produktivnost' travyanykh ecosistem [Biological productivity of herbaceous ecosystems] (V.B. Ilyin, ed.). Nauka, Novosibirsk (In Russian). pp. 3-10.

Volkovincer, V.I. (1978) Steppe cryoarid soils Nauka, Novosibirsk. 208 pp. (In Russian).

18. Glossary of Terms:

A glossary of EOSDIS terms is available at http://www-v0ims.gsfc.nasa.gov/v0ims/glossary.of.terms.html.

19. List of Acronyms:

The EOSDIS Acronym and Abbreviation List is located at http://www-v0ims.gsfc.nasa.gov/v0ims/acronyms.html

Document Information:

Document Revision Date:

Review Date:

Document ID:

Citation:

Document Curator:

Document Author:

Document URL: