skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 144576  
Title: SENTENCING GUIDELINES: A NEED FOR CREATIVE COLLABORATION
Journal: Yale Law Journal  Volume:101  Issue:8  Dated:(June 1992)  Pages:2043-2051
Author(s): M E Frankel
Publication Date: 1992
Pages: 9
Type: Legislation/policy analysis
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This article assesses the Federal sentencing guidelines as being too harsh and inflexible and proposes ways to ameliorate these characteristics.
Abstract: The Federal Sentencing Commission was established at a time was there was a strong punitive sentiment in the Federal legislature and elsewhere. The Commission's sentencing guidelines reflect this sentiment, as they actually increased the overall severity of Federal sentencing, with white-collar offenders being particular targets. Part of the pattern of excessive severity is the Commission's relatively cursory and mechanical handling of mitigating factors in sentencing. The guidelines would be enhanced by the inclusion of more mitigating factors to justify sentences in the low range of the guidelines, while leaving the option for departures from the guidelines when judges believe them appropriate for particular cases. Such departures should be received more hospitably by both the Commission and the appellate courts in these early stages of guidelines implementation. This would help the Commission and the appellate courts to ascertain and appreciate judicial judgments regarding sentencing. This is particularly important in these early years of guidelines implementation. 16 footnotes
Main Term(s): Sentencing guidelines
Index Term(s): Federal courts ; Sentencing commissions ; Courts/
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=144576

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder