j lines; second, whether it has safeguarded 'public interests in keeping taxation t> the the lowest point; third, whether it will have a tendency to stimulate public interest in muncipal affairs so that the self-seeing, dis-'¦ honest and incompetent shall not manage the affairs of the city, robbing the people in taxes and debauching the morals of the community by failure to administer the : laws. Mr. Nicholas the a told the story of the ' drafting of the charter. He called attention : to the fact that although the char-iter, in substance, was printed in ! all the papers, and although the call to the hearing before the senator from this district was extensively published, lest than a huu-dreJ persons gathered to see the senator. Two gentlemen only had appeared before him to discuss the charter and its provisions. The speaker pointed out these facts to show that comparatively few citizens manifested the slightest interested in the charter. Women Ought to Vote. "Either the people thought the charter as published a most perfect instrument," said Mr. Nicholas, "or they are dead to theiri own interests. If anything in the world; could convince me that women ought to j vote it is the fact that men, largely through 1 their own indifference, are not more thau half fit to govern themselves." _,___ I A MUNICIPAL LEAGUE","" THE ORVTOR OF THE EVENING MAKES AN INTERESTING ADDRESS. P. N. NICHOLAS SPEAKS UPON THE CHARTER AND THE NEEDS OF A CITY. I am asked to address this association "The Geneva Political Equality Club" I upon "Our City Goverment and how it is supported." If I were addressing a I political body I would be influenced to say many things that would probably be out of place here, and yet I am not at all sure that I am not addressing a political body, divided not perhaps on the lines that to-day separate other political parties, but on lines none the less distinct I and definite. i: Before I consented to speak to you on thcjcity cl*a.'-terl thir!:, maybe it would iiarro-weu -w,!, In botn'j Caer -Executive- aud t'ollce Departments of the city Mr. Nicholas continued : Now to turn from what might be to what is,.I wish to express my appreciation of our present police force, and especially for our Chief of Police, from whom I have not only a high regard but a feeling of personal friendship. I voted as Police Commissioner for four out of the five of the present forca. I believe they are honest and capable, and, under the stimulating influence of a proper public opinion, would not be excelled in the state for efficiency. I k.;ow what they have had to contend with. You may say it is the inuiflerence 01 wie Police Commissioners or laxity in the Poiice Court. These may be the immediate but not the primary causes. The primary causes are the laxity and indifference of public opinion. The stream will not rise higher than its source. Now while I have outlined a possible . state of affairs which would make the formation of a Municipal League almost a necessity, I want to say that I think that the City is to be congratulated upon most of the appointments already made. The B'Kird of Public Workshasappointed as Superintendent Mr. Seybolt whose fitness is acknowledged by all. The Board of Health has appointed Dr. Bishop as Health Officer, a physician eminently qualified for the work, and the Board of Charities has appointed as Poor Master. John Jordan, than whom for the place there is no better man for the place. The Mayor in appointing Mr. Hofmann as assessor, has I tnink chosen a man with as large a combination of honesty experience and " gray matter " as any man in our city. I have had a great deal to do with him in the framing of the charter, and I speak from my personal knowledge of the man. Our cicy is well equipped in officers, our charter is, I believe, a good one and a source ot public sentiment will stand behind our City Government. There is no reason why our condition should not be immeasurably improved. Now with a municipal league divided up into committees to whom were given different departments, for investigation, not only in criminal mactors but in civil, Committees which have the courage to present to the grand jury for indictment, those officers, if any, who were derelict in their duty, or were dishonest in the man-agment of the trusts committed to them; who would prepare for the public preq-from time to time statements of lacts touching the managment of the different departments: I say with such a league efficiently managed, we would, secure a batter service than we are likely to get if we take everything for granted and believe that the things which do noi appear on the surface do not in ta.ee exist. My idea would be to engage in the prosecution, not of the so-called criminal class, but in the prosecution of thos officers charged with the duty of preventing crime, who knowingly allow crim' to e.dst; and in civil matters to secure indictments for dishonesty and exposure for inefficiency. To ascertain what city officers, if any were directly or indirectly interested in supplies furnished the city, which by the charter is made a 1 misdemeanor, and when the facts were ascertained publish them with the names of the guilty parties. Now all these matters, though they are far from pleasant, I think the members of this association are as capable of investigating as the men, I do noc say I think it is their duty to do it. any more than I think ¦ ¦¦I IMMII^—I it is their duty to vote, and yet, they, are matters which enter into every day municipal life, and do not take the |i strength of a man to perform, and they are some of- the very many disagreeable things of life which go with the privileges of full citizenship. And when such a league is formed, as I believe it will be formed. I shall be very glad to present the names of any or all the members of this club for election. Maybe you will all be black-balled, but no matter; you will have done your duty in offering to bear your share in the burdens of citizenship, and I will have done my duty and will have taken pleasure in having presented your names and in having voted for you. To turn to the real subject in hand tc-J night. I ought to say that 1 was not origin-1 ally selected to speak co you, and only consented to take Judge Mason's place because he requested it, and because n y refusal would have entailed upon him not only the effort of speaking here to-night, buJ also a preparatory study of a long and somewhat complicated statute, with which from the circumstances of the c; se| I was already somewuat familiar. It is now somewhat over a year since I was engaged in framingthe charter which' on the first day of January constituted us a city of the third class. "Whether that I change will enure to our benefit depends not on the change of name, but upon vhether, First: Our charter is elastic enoush or broad enough to allow growth and development along proper lines. Second: Wiiother ic has safe-guarded our interests in ke'eping taxation to the lowe-t point compatible with public safety and public comfort, and Third: Whether it will have a tendency tc stimulate public interest in municipal affairs so that the self-seeking, dishonest and incompetent shall not manage the affairs of the city, robbing tho.'[people in taxes and debauching the morals of the community by failure to administer th« laws. If, as I say, the new charter does provide the machinery, and if the people as citizens and not as politicians insist on their rights and privileges under it, then our new condition will bj a blessing, otherwise a curse. It is said that " A beetle is a beauty in the eyes of its mother," and so having aj paternal interest in the city charter, I! also may be blind to some of its defect, but if these detects are pointed out to me I shall be very glad to help remedy them, rather than belittle them to try to cover them up. ' Some of you possibly have read thei charter through, but if so it was surelj from a sense of duty, as it is not lighf reading, and cun hardly be • graspmhmi-if whole by one unfamiliar with legal? phraseology, or unacquainted with muni-oiial machinery. 1 confess myself to have forgotten many of the provisions in it. It was prepared by order of the Board of Trustees, under the direction of a committee, and the committee was authorized to employ certain counsel named in making the draft. It was prepared at the last under a good deal of pressure, and for several days we fed copy to three printing offices, reading proof and preparing new copy at the same time. The result was we were not satisfied with the first draft after it had passed to a second reading in the Senate and re-called it, for correction and change*, before the committee reported it. It was then reprinted and ordered ,;to a third reading, and still, on account of some clerical errors, was again .amended, re-Tinted, and then passed in its present form. jfrior to all this, however, and before _ the charter was voted upon by the people ' of Geneva, it was printed in the village L papers and scattered almost broadcast ¦. among the paople. ' ,.™ > After it was voted upon, and before it ' w»j passed by the Legislature, thejSenator ' I from this distiict gave notice thathe would give a public hearing in the trustee's room, and all were invited to come and say what they had to say for or against it. The call for that meeting was pnblished in our newspapers, and everybody knew of in. What was the result? A crowd of fifty or a hundred gathered to see the Senator. Two gentlemen only appeared before him to discuss the charter and its provisions. One opposed it because he was in the "annexed district"' and objected to being taxed, and as I remember it, that wos his sole objection to the charter as it stood, v z. its boundary lines. The other gem leman appeared by request of several laige tax-payers, and objected to it first becuis* it provided for the election at a time when a state election was being heid, and secondly because it did away w.th the tax-meeting. Mr. Raines said: "Gentlemen, your people have voted emplviric:illy for a city charter; the question thwi only is what sort of a charter do you '.witit ? " Kovv I do not say thao the objections made by the two gentlemen w.io appeared were not good objections irom their point of view. They were both lawyers and both I nresume had read the charter and under-sto )d it, and one of them I know had studied it quite carefully. But what I want to call your attsntion to is the fact of a general lack of interest shown in the most vital of public affairs. One would have supposed that after the first publication of the charter there would have been 50 or 100 men who would havo had intelligent criticisms or sugges-ion