login R063.ZS short=$ 2-U.S. v. Idaho Water Resources long=R063; 5/3/93. The McCarran Amendment, 43 U. S. C. sec. 666(a), does not long=waive the United States' sovereign immunity from the payment of the long=filing fees required by Idaho in its comprehensive state-court long=adjudication of water rights in the Snake River. Syllabus. keywords=92-190 U.S. Idaho Syllabus Rehnquist,CJ McCarran-Amdt Immunity keywords=43USC666(a) login R063_o.ZO short=$ 2-U.S. v. Idaho Water Resources long=R063-O; 5/3/93. The McCarran Amendment, 43 U. S. C. sec. 666(a), does long=not waive the United States' sovereign immunity from the payment of the long=filing fees required by Idaho in its comprehensive state-court long=adjudication of water rights in the Snake River. Rehnquist, C. J., long=opinion. keywords=92-190 US Idaho Opinion Rehnquist,CJ McCarran-Amdt Immunity keywords=43USC666(a) login R063a.ZC short=$ 2-U.S. v. Idaho Water Resources long=R063A; 5/3/93. The McCarran Amendment, 43 U. S. C. sec. 666(a), does not long=waive the United States' sovereign immunity from the payment of the long=filing fees required by Idaho in its comprehensive state-court long=adjudication of water rights in the Snake River. Stevens, J., concurring in judgment. keywords=92-190 US Idaho Concur Stevens,J McCarran-Amdt Immunity 43USC666(a) login R064.ZS short=$ 2-Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group long=R064; 5/3/93. Because respondent "Section 8" landlords have no contract long=right to unobstructed formula-based rent adjustments, the Court need not long=consider whether sec. 801 of the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development long=Reform Act of 1989 unconstitutionally abrogated that right. Syllabus. keywords=92-551 Cisneros AlpineRidgeGroup Syllabus White,J HUD Comparability keywords=Section-8 login R064_o.ZO short=$ 3-Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group long=R064-O; 5/3/93. Because respondent "Section 8" landlords have no long=contract right to unobstructed formula-based rent adjustments, the Court long=need not consider whether sec. 801 of the Dept. of Housing and Urban long=Development Reform Act of 1989 unconstitutionally abrogated that right. long=White, J., opinion. keywords=92-551 Cisneros AlpineRidgeGroup Opinion White,J HUD Comparability keywords=Section-8 login R065.ZS short=$ 2-Moreau v. Klevenhagen long=R065; 5/3/93. Because petitioner county deputy sheriffs are "employees long=not covered by subclause (i)" of sec. 7(o)(2)(A) of the Fair Labor long=Standards Act, subclause (ii) authorizes their employer to provide long=compensatory time for their overtime work pursuant to individual long=agreements. Syllabus. keywords=92-1 Syllabus Moreau Klevenhagen Stevens,J Comp-time keywords=29USC207(o)(2)(A Overtime login R065_o.ZO short=$ 2-Moreau v. Klevenhagen long=R065-O; 5/3/93. Because petitioner county deputy sheriffs are "employees not long=covered by subclause (i)" of sec. 7(o)(2)(A) of the Fair Labor Standards long=Act, subclause (ii) authorizes their employer to provide compensatory long=time for their overtime work pursuant to individual agreements. long=Stevens, J., opinion. keywords=92-1 Opinion Moreau Klevenhagen Stevens,J Comp-time 29USC207(o)(2)(A keywords=Overtime login R066.ZS short=$ 2-Stinson v. U.S. long=R066; 5/3/93. Official commentary to the federal Sentencing Guidelines long=is an authoritative intrerpretation that binds the federal courts unless long=it violates a statute or the Constitution, or is inconsistent with, or a long=plainly erroneous reading of, the guideline it interprets. Syllabus. keywords=Career-offender Kennedy,J Syllabus Sentencing-GuidelinesStinson keywords=Stinson US 91-8685 Commentary login R067_o.ZO short=$ 3-Stinson v. U.S. long=R066-O; 5/3/93. Official commentary to the federal Sentencing Guidelines long=is an authoritative intrerpretation that binds the federal courts unless long=it violates a statute or the Constitution, or is inconsistent with, or a long=plainly erroneous reading of, the guideline it interprets. Kennedy, J., long=opinion. keywords=Career-offender Kennedy,J Opinion Sentencing-GuidelinesStinson keywords=Stinson US 91-8685 Commentary login R067.ZS short=$ 2-Pro. Investors v. Columbia Pictures long=R067; 5/3/93. Litigation cannot be deprived of antitrust immunity as a long=sham unless the litigation is objectively baseless, regardless of the long=litigant's subjective intent in bringing suit. Syllabus. keywords=Syllabus 91-1043 Thomas,J Pro-Investors Columbia Antitrust keywords=Sham-litigation Immunity login R067_o.ZO short=$ 3-Pro. Investors v. Columbia Pictures long=R067-O; 5/3/93. Litigation cannot be deprived of antitrust immunity as a long=sham unless the litigation is objectively baseless, regardless of the long=litigant's subjective intent in bringing suit. Thomas, J., opinion. keywords=Opinion 91-1043 Thomas,J Pro-Investors Columbia Antitrust keywords=Sham-litigation Immunity login R067a.ZC short=$ 2-Pro. Investors v. Columbia Pictures long=R067A; 5/3/93. Litigation cannot be deprived of antitrust immunity as a long=sham unless the litigation is objectively baseless, regardless of the long=litigant's subjective intent in bringing suit. Souter, J., concurring. keywords=Concur 91-1043 Souter,J Pro-Investors Columbia Antitrust keywords=Sham-litigation Immunity login R067b.ZC1 short=$ 3-Pro. Investors v. Columbia Pictures long=R067B; 5/3/93. Litigation cannot be deprived of antitrust immunity as a long=sham unless the litigation is objectively baseless, regardless of the long=litigant's subjective intent in bringing suit. Stevens, J., long=concurring in judgment. keywords=Concur 91-1043 Stevens,J Pro-Investors Columbia Antitrust keywords=Sham-litigation Immunity login R068_o.ZPC short=$ 2-U.S. v. Padilla long=R068-O; 5/3/93. A co-conspirator does not obtain a legitimate long=expectation of privacy for Fourth Amendment purposes from having either long=a supervisory role in the conspiracy or joint control over the place or long=property involved in the search or seizure. Per Curiam. long=92-207 US Padilla Criminal-law PerCuriam Fourth-Amendment Seizures keywords=Co-conspirators