pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of jcmJ Clin Microbiol SubscriptionsJ Clin Microbiol Web Site
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 May; 43(5): 2315–2329.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2315-2329.2005.
PMCID: PMC1153752
Extended Multilocus Sequence Typing System for Campylobacter coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. helveticus
William G. Miller,1* Stephen L. W. On,2 Guilin Wang,1 Samarpita Fontanoz,1 Albert J. Lastovica,3 and Robert E. Mandrell1
Produce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, CA 94710,1 Danish Veterinary Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark,2 Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Division of Medical Microbiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa3
*Corresponding author. Mailing address: USDA, ARS, WRRC, Produce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, 800 Buchanan St., Albany, CA 94710. Phone: (510) 559-5992. Fax: (510) 559-6162. E-mail: bmiller/at/pw.usda.gov.
Received September 3, 2004; Revised November 8, 2004; Accepted January 7, 2005.
Abstract
A multilocus sequence typing (MLST) system has been reported previously for Campylobacter jejuni to both differentiate strains and identify clonal lineages. However, sequence variation at the MLST loci prevents its use for closely related Campylobacter species. We describe herein an expanded MLST method to include three clinically relevant Campylobacter species, C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis, and a fourth Campylobacter species, C. helveticus. The C. coli and C. helveticus methods use the same seven C. jejuni loci (aspA, atpA, glnA, gltA, glyA, pgm, and tkt); however, adk and pgi were substituted for aspA and gltA in C. lari and for gltA and pgm in C. upsaliensis. Multiple C. coli (n = 57), C. lari (n = 20), C. upsaliensis (n = 78), and C. helveticus (n = 9) isolates, representing both clinical and environmental sources, were typed. All four species were genetically diverse: the majority (>80%) of the isolates had unique sequence types (STs). Using this method, mixed C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. helveticus isolates were identified; upon separation, each isolate was shown to contain two strains of the same species with distinct STs. Additionally, the expanded MLST method was able to detect potential lateral transfer events between C. jejuni and either C. coli or C. lari and between C. upsaliensis and C. helveticus. Thus, the expanded MLST method will prove useful in differentiating strains of five Campylobacter species, identifying mixed Campylobacter cultures, and detecting genetic exchange within the genus.
 
Campylobacter spp. are a major cause of human bacterial gastrointestinal illness in the developed world (1, 9, 23, 24, 61). The incidence of reported campylobacteriosis in the United States in 2003 was 12.6 cases per 100,000 persons, second only to infections by Salmonella spp. (14.5 cases per 100,000 persons) (9). The majority of campylobacterioses are caused by Campylobacter jejuni; however, the causative agents in many of these illnesses are typed only to the genus level, i.e., Campylobacter spp. C. jejuni is highly prevalent in poultry (4, 5, 19, 31), and poultry products are often assumed to be the source of most C. jejuni infections (22, 30, 49, 58, 62), although poultry isolates may not all be equally pathogenic (25, 51). Other sources, such as untreated water (7, 15, 29) and unpasteurized milk (18, 34), can also lead to campylobacteriosis. C. jejuni infections are mainly sporadic, although occasional outbreaks can occur (23, 54). The necessity of a reliable typing method to characterize C. jejuni strains and investigate the epidemiology of C. jejuni infections provided the impetus for the development of a multilocus sequence typing (MLST) system for C. jejuni. This method was developed by Dingle et al. (12) and has been used successfully to characterize C. jejuni strains (11, 13, 43, 59, 63) and investigate C. jejuni outbreaks (60). As with MLST methods developed in other taxa, this system amplifies and sequences portions of seven housekeeping genes. Based on the sequence information at each locus, allele numbers are assigned, with distinct allele sequences receiving arbitrary allele numbers. Typing of 194 strains identified 155 sequence types (STs); each ST consists of a unique allelic profile. C. jejuni allele sequences and sequence types were made available in a web-based Campylobacter MLST database (http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/). Since the development of this typing scheme, >1,000 STs have been identified. Selection of the seven housekeeping genes was based on the ability to amplify these genes from a diverse group of sources, sufficient sequence variation at each locus, and the absence of positive selection for each locus (12). The seven housekeeping genes chosen were aspA (aspartase A), atpA (ATP synthase α subunit; termed uncA in reference 12), glnA (glutamine synthetase), gltA (citrate synthase), glyA (serine hydroxymethyltransferase), pgm (actually Cj0360; phosphoglucomutase), and tkt (transketolase).

Although the majority of Campylobacter infections are caused by C. jejuni, other Campylobacter species, e.g., C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis, have been associated with either sporadic (10, 28, 37, 39, 52, 55, 65) or outbreak (8, 26, 40, 57) cases of gastroenteritis in humans. C. jejuni and C. coli are often isolated from the same hosts (48). C. lari and C. upsaliensis are infrequent contaminants of poultry (2, 42), but C. lari has been isolated from shellfish (i.e., mussels and oysters) (14, 66). C. upsaliensis is predominantly associated with domestic dogs and cats (3, 17); a related Campylobacter sp., C. helveticus, has also been isolated from dogs and cats (64) but has not been shown to cause human illness.

The current MLST method is designed to type only C. jejuni strains. Because of the nondegenerate nature of the C. jejuni MLST primer sets and substantial sequence diversity between C. jejuni and other Campylobacter species (21), these primer sets can be used to type some C. coli alleles or loci but cannot be used to type other Campylobacter species (e.g., C. lari and C. upsaliensis). Therefore, although the C. jejuni MLST method has identified potential genetic exchange between C. jejuni and C. coli (45, 63), it cannot identify genetic exchange and recombination between other Campylobacter species; such genetic exchange has been proposed to play a role in the evolution of the genus (45, 46). Thus, there is a need for an extended MLST scheme that types the non-C. jejuni campylobacters. The recent draft sequencing of the genomes of three additional Campylobacter species (i.e., C. coli, C. upsaliensis, and C. lari [21]) was available to expand the current C. jejuni MLST system to include these thermotolerant and clinically relevant Campylobacter species.

Here, we describe an expanded MLST method for C. coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. helveticus. The genomic sequences for these strains were used to construct novel, degenerate primer sets which can amplify seven housekeeping loci from five Campylobacter species (including C. jejuni). Over 150 Campylobacter strains, isolated from both clinical and environmental sources, were characterized with this system. One hundred twenty-eight STs were identified as well as clonal lineages in each species. Additional advantages of this MLST method were the capabilities of detecting mixed cultures of Campylobacter and genetic exchange and recombination between Campylobacter species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Growth conditions and chemicals. All Campylobacter strains were cultured routinely at 37°C on brucella agar amended with 5% (vol/vol) laked horse blood (BAB) (Hema Resource & Supply, Aurora, Oreg.). Atmospheric conditions for all strains were 5% H2, 10% CO2, and 85% N2. PCR enzymes and reagents were purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, Mass.) or Epicentre (Madison, Wis.). All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals (St. Louis, Mo.) or Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, Pa.). DNA sequencing chemicals and capillaries were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, Calif.).

DNA purification, amplification, and sequencing. Campylobacter genomic DNA was prepared as follows: cells were scraped from agar plates and resuspended in 1.5 ml 10% (wt/vol) sucrose, 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0). Two hundred fifty μl of a 10-mg ml−1 lysozyme solution (in 250 mM Tris, pH 8.0) and 600 μl of 0.1 M EDTA were then added to the suspension. The suspension was incubated for 10 min on ice, then 300 μl of a 5% (wt/vol) sodium dodecyl sulfate solution was added, and the mixture was vortexed briefly to clarify the solution. The lysates were incubated sequentially with 25 μl RNase A (1 mg ml−1) and 10 μl proteinase K (10 mg ml−1), and the DNA was spooled following addition of sodium acetate (1/10 volume) and ethanol (room temperature, 2 volumes). DNA was resuspended in Tris-EDTA (pH 8.0), extracted twice with phenol-chloroform (1:1, vol/vol) and once with chloroform, and concentrated by ethanol precipitation.

PCRs were performed on an MJ Research (South San Francisco, Calif.) Tetrad thermocycler with the following settings: 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 53°C, and 2 min at 72°C (30 cycles). Each amplification mixture contained 50 ng genomic DNA, 1× PCR buffer (Epicentre), 1× PCR enhancer (Epicentre), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 250 μM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 50 pmol each primer, and 0.2 U polymerase (New England Biolabs). Amplicons were purified on a BioRobot 8000 workstation (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, Calif.).

Cycle sequencing reactions were performed on an MJ Research Tetrad thermocycler using the ABI PRISM BigDye terminator cycle sequencing kit (version 3.0) and standard protocols. All extension products were purified on DyeEx 96-well plates (Qiagen). DNA sequencing was performed on an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) using the POP-6 polymer and ABI PRISM Genetic Analyzer Data Collection and ABI PRISM Genetic Analyzer Sequencing Analysis software. PCR/sequencing oligonucleotides were purchased from Qiagen.

Separation of mixed cultures. Strains C. coli RM1908, C. lari RM2816, C. upsaliensis RM3949, C. upsaliensis RM4048, and C. helveticus RM4087 were grown for 48 h on BAB plates. Approximately 5 to 10 μl of cells was removed from the plates with 1-μl loops and resuspended in 1 ml phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.0). The suspensions were sonicated (VWR Ultrasonic Bath Sonicator model 75T; VWR, West Chester, Pa.) for 4 min at the default intensity, vortexed for 30 s, dilution plated onto fresh BAB plates, and incubated for 48 h. For each strain, 8 or 16 well-isolated colonies were picked, resuspended in 100 μl 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0), lysed in a thermocycler (5 min at 94°C), and centrifuged to pellet cell debris. As a quick screen to determine which colonies represented different sequence types, genomic DNAs from all cell lysates were first amplified and sequenced using the aspAF1/aspAR1 (for strain RM1908) or aspAF2/aspAR2 (for strains RM2816, RM3949, RM4048, and RM4087) primer set. aspA allele sequences for each strain were aligned, and genomic DNAs representing different alleles were identified. These genomic DNAs were amplified subsequently and sequenced using all seven MLST primer sets. In both rounds of amplification, reaction conditions were as described above using 2 μl lysed culture supernatant per reaction.

Assignment of allele numbers, sequence types, and clonal complexes. The Perl program MLSTparser was written to extract allele sequences and assign allele numbers and sequence types. With an input of FASTA-formatted files representing the forward and reverse reads for each isolate, MLSTparser extracts the in-frame internal gene fragments from each read and compares the fragment sequence from the forward read and the complemented fragment sequence from the reverse read. Forward and complemented reverse sequences that are not identical are not analyzed further. MLSTparser then assigns allele numbers arbitrarily to unique sequences for each locus in the order that they are identified, by increasing “RM” strain number in this study. Similarly, sequence types are assigned arbitrarily to unique allelic profiles. All allelic sequences were queried against the Campylobacter jejuni/coli MLST database (http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/) and assigned secondary allele numbers, where applicable.

Sequence types were grouped into clonal complexes using the program eBURST (http://eburst.mlst.net) (20). Clonal complexes were defined as groups of two or more independent isolates that shared identical alleles at five or more loci. Where applicable, each complex was named after the putative founder sequence type (e.g., ST-1 complex). Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) dendrogram construction and calculation of the dn/ds ratios were performed using the computer program START (33). Variable sites were identified using MEGA version 2.1 (36).

AFLP profiling of C. upsaliensis strains. Genomic DNA was extracted from strains by use of an Easy-DNA kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA; protocol 3 per the manufacturer's instructions). AFLP profiling was performed subsequently by use of the method described by Siemer et al. (63a). Briefly, approximately 625 ng genomic DNA was digested with 1 U MfeI and 1 U BspDI in NEB4 buffer (New England Biolabs) for 1 h at 37°C, and adaptor sequences complementary to the restriction sites were ligated to the restriction fragments by the addition of 1 U T4 DNA ligase, 2 μl 10× T4 DNA ligase buffer (USB Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio), 2 μM FC adaptor, and 20 μM RC adaptor. After a 3-h incubation period at 37°C, the reaction mixture was diluted (1:25 ratio) with sterile, double-distilled water. PCR was then performed by use of nonselective, half-site-specific primers MfeI-F (5′ GAG AGC TCT TGG AAT TG 3′, FAM [6-carboxylfluorescein] labeled at the 5′ end) and BspDI (5′ GTG TAC TCT AGT CCG AT 3′) (DNA Technology, Århus, Denmark). Amplification conditions were as described previously (35), except that a 25-cycle program was used. AFLP fragments were detected on an ABI 377 automated sequencing machine (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), and data were collected and analyzed with GeneScan v. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) and BioNumerics v. 3.0 (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium), as described previously (53).

RESULTS

Experimental rationale. A multilocus sequence typing system for C. jejuni was described recently by Dingle et al. (12). The recent draft sequencing of the genomes of three additional Campylobacter species (i.e., C. coli, C. upsaliensis, and C. lari [21]) permitted an expansion of the C. jejuni MLST system to include these additional species. To keep the expanded MLST system as analogous as possible to the system described by Dingle et al. (12), we wanted our new system to include the same seven housekeeping genes (aspA, atpA, glnA, gltA, glyA, pgm, and tkt) and the same in-frame internal fragments. Additionally, in order to minimize the number of oligonucleotide primers required by the expanded system, each primer set should amplify as many species as possible, preferably all four (including C. jejuni). Our criteria for the expanded Campylobacter MLST system included both versatility and discriminatory power. Primer sets that did not amplify every isolate for a given species, or loci in which most or all alleles were identical, would be excluded from the final system for that species.

Design and characterization of the extended Campylobacter multilocus sequence typing system. To design a universal set of Campylobacter MLST primers, the sequences of the seven housekeeping genes described above were extracted from the complete or draft sequences of C. jejuni strains NCTC 11168 and RM1221, C. coli strain RM2228, C. upsaliensis strain RM3195, and C. lari strain RM2100 and aligned. The sequences of two additional housekeeping genes, adk (adenylate kinase) and pgi (glucose-6-phosphate isomerase), used previously in a second C. jejuni MLST method (43), were also extracted and aligned. Such alignments would be beneficial in the construction of universal primer sets; presumably, degenerate primers designed to amplify all four species would also amplify most, if not all, of the strains of each species. Despite substantial nucleotide sequence diversity between all four species, degenerate primer sets (Table 1) that would amplify genomic DNA from all four Campylobacter species could be constructed for four loci (adk, atpA, glnA, and glyA). Surprisingly, these same primer sets also amplified genomic DNA from isolates of a fifth species, C. helveticus, suggesting that the new MLST scheme could be expanded to type five Campylobacter species. Unfortunately, analysis of the closed C. lari RM2100 genome and PCR analysis of 20 other C. lari strains indicated that the gene encoding citrate synthase, gltA, was absent in RM2100 and possibly absent in C. lari in general. Sequence diversity at the remaining loci prevented the construction of single, universal primer sets: two different primer sets were constructed for the aspA and tkt loci and three primer sets were constructed for the pgi and pgm loci (Table 1).

TABLE 1.TABLE 1.
Campylobacter expanded MLST primer sets

To test these primer sets, genomic DNA from 57 C. coli, 20 C. lari (including four urease-positive strains), 78 C. upsaliensis, and 9 C. helveticus strains was amplified and sequenced. Every C. coli strain amplified with primer sets for all nine loci; however, to keep the C. coli and C. jejuni MLST methods comparable, the final seven loci were the same as described for C. jejuni. In contrast, either the loci of several C. lari, C. upsaliensis, or C. helveticus strains were inconsistently amplified (C. lari aspA, C. upsaliensis gltA, and C. helveticus pgi) or the resulting alleles were insufficiently variable (C. lari aspA and C. helveticus adk). Therefore, these loci were not included in the final expanded typing systems. The final C. upsaliensis typing system includes the following seven loci: adk, aspA, atpA, glnA, glyA, pgi, and tkt. The C. lari MLST system contains the following seven loci: adk, atpA, glnA, glyA, pgi, pgm, and tkt. The final C. helveticus typing system includes the same seven loci as described for C. jejuni.

Genetic diversity at the expanded Campylobacter MLST loci. Although a limited number of C. lari and C. helveticus isolates were typed, many alleles were found at each of the nine loci in these two species (Table 2): all eight of the C. helveticus isolates contained different glyA alleles and 14 of 19 (73.7%) C. lari isolates contained different adk alleles. A large percentage of variable sites were found in C. lari (15.5% to 19.1%). Many of these variable sites were due to the presence of five strains in the sample set: the urease-positive isolates RM3659, RM3660, RM3661, and RM4110 and the divergent isolate RM2824. The ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous base substitutions (dn/ds) ranged from 0 to 0.173 for C. coli, 0 to 0.047 for C. lari, 0.008 to 0.097 for C. upsaliensis, and 0 to 0.580 for C. helveticus (Table 2). With three exceptions (C. helveticus gltA, glyA, and tkt), these ratios were much less than 1; it is unclear what the high values for the C. helveticus gltA, glyA, and tkt loci represent.

TABLE 2.TABLE 2.
Diversity at the expanded Campylobacter MLST loci

Sequence types and clonal complexes. In accordance with the large number of alleles present in the four species at each of the nine loci, 126 STs were identified among the 152 isolates typed in this study: 37 STs in C. coli, 15 STs in C. lari, 66 STs in C. upsaliensis, and 8 STs in C. helveticus (Tables 3 to 6). Many of these STs were unique in the sample set, the most commonly identified STs being C. coli ST-1058 (STC-1058) and C. upsaliensis ST-12 (STU-12). The majority (31 of 37, 83.8%) of the C. coli STs were assigned to the ST-1017 complex; a smaller clonal complex, ST-1052, contained four members and two STs. One complex, termed ST-2, was present in C. lari. The C. lari ST-2 complex had five members but only two STs, STL-2 and STL-6. Six complexes were identified in C. upsaliensis. The ST-42 complex was the largest, with 20 members and 14 STs. The five other complexes, termed ST-16, ST-35, ST-45, ST-50, and ST-64, contained between two and four STs. Only one complex was identified in C. helveticus: ST-1 with two member STs.

TABLE 3.TABLE 3.
Allele numbers, sequence types, and lineages for C. coli isolates (n = 56)a
TABLE 6.TABLE 6.
Allele numbers, sequence types, and lineages for C. helveticus isolates (n = 8)a

In C. coli and C. lari, no correlation could be made between membership in any of the three complexes and the isolate source, the geographic location in which the strain was isolated, or the date of isolation. No definitive genogroups were identified by UPGMA analysis of the C. coli allele profiles (Fig. 1) However, three clonal complexes in C. upsaliensis (ST-42, ST-45, and ST-50) showed a definitive correlation with both isolate source and geographic location. Members of the ST-42 complex were all clinical isolates from South Africa, and members of both the ST-45 and ST-50 complexes were all clinical isolates from either Belgium or France (Table 5). Additionally, some isolates from household pets were associated with minor clonal complexes. In contrast, canine or clinical C. upsaliensis strains isolated at the California Department of Health Services laboratory in Los Angeles, CA (37), were all assigned unique STs; three of the STs (STU-19, STU-25, and STU-27) originated from the same household (Table 5). UPGMA analysis of the C. upsaliensis allele profiles defines two genogroups (Fig. 2). Genogroup II contains four subgroups, termed here “A” through “D.” Phylogenetic analysis of each of the seven loci produces dendrograms with similar topologies (data not shown), indicating that the phenogram in Fig. 2 is an accurate representation of genetic differences between the strains. Genogroups IIA and IIB are comprised exclusively of C. upsaliensis isolates from Belgium and France, genogroup IIC is comprised exclusively of isolates from South Africa, and genogroup IID is comprised of isolates from Belgium, South Africa, and the United Kingdom.

FIG. 1.FIG. 1.
UPGMA clustering of C. coli strains. Chicken strains are annotated with stars; swine strains are annotated with filled circles; human strains are annotated with open squares.
TABLE 5.TABLE 5.
Allele numbers, sequence types, and lineages for C. upsaliensis isolates (n = 76)a
FIG. 2.FIG. 2.
UPGMA clustering of C. upsaliensis strains. South African C. upsaliensis strains are annotated with stars; strains from Belgium or France are annotated with filled circles; strains from California are annotated with open squares.

Comparison of C. upsaliensis MLST and AFLP profiles. Reproducibility of the AFLP method was evaluated by examining nine C. upsaliensis strains in duplicate experiments. Strains were examined between two and four times on different occasions, and a total of 21 duplicate profiles were used. The mean similarity between paired, duplicate strain profiles was determined as 91%. The C. upsaliensis strains studied gave unique AFLP profiles containing 9 to 29 fluorescently labeled fragments (Fig. 3). Results of the cluster analysis showed an excellent correlation with that of the MLST data. Three major clusters were formed at the 50% similarity (S level), of which all strains in AFLP cluster 1 appeared phylogenetically related in the MLST analysis (Fig. 2). AFLP cluster 2 strains were similarly assigned to MLST cluster II (Fig. 2), with representatives of MLST subphenons IID and IIC, respectively, sharing a higher level of similarity by AFLP analysis to other representatives of the same subphenon. Moreover, the only two strains belonging to MLST subphenon IIC assigned to the same sequence type complex (RM3776 and RM3779; ST-42 complex) were highly related by AFLP analysis (85% similar). AFLP cluster 3 contained the only member of MLST cluster IIB studied.

FIG. 3.FIG. 3.
AFLP phenogram for a representative set of C. upsaliensis strains. South African C. upsaliensis strains are annotated with stars; a strain from Belgium or France is annotated with a filled circle; strains from California are annotated with open squares. (more ...)

Analysis of mixed Campylobacter isolates. During the course of sequencing the MLST amplicons, we noticed that traces from several, but not all, loci in five strains (C. coli strain RM1908, C. lari strain RM2816, C. upsaliensis strains RM3949 and RM4048, and C. helveticus strain RM4087) contained both a primary and secondary peak at certain nucleotide positions. These loci were reamplified and resequenced with identical results. Comparison of the forward traces with the reverse-complemented reverse traces indicated that the same secondary peaks were occurring at the same nucleotide positions. Further analysis indicated that these single-nucleotide polymorphisms represented normal allelic variation at these loci. For example, all C. lari aspA alleles contain an A or a T at nucleotide 234 and the C. lari RM2816 aspA traces contain both A and T peaks at that position. This suggested that these “strains,” designated as pure cultures, in fact were mixed cultures of two or more strains.

To verify that these strains were mixed, cells were sonicated to break apart potential aggregates, vortexed vigorously, and then dilution plated. Genomic DNA from well-isolated single colonies was amplified and sequenced. The resulting allele profiles and STs are shown in Table 7. For C. coli strain RM1908 and C. lari strain RM2816, two distinct allele profiles are present. Additionally, superimposition of the two forward traces at each locus corresponds accurately with the original “mixed” forward traces, demonstrating that the original RM1908 and RM2816 cultures were mixtures. The distribution of the profiles between the C. coli and C. lari colonies was approximately 0.3:0.7 (C. coli) and 0.5:0.5 (C. lari); however, one RM2816 colony remained “mixed” despite sonication and vortexing. Only one allele profile was isolated from C. upsaliensis strains RM3949 and RM4048 (Table 7) and C. helveticus RM4087 (data not shown), despite two attempts at separation. All traces for the first two strains were unambiguous and corresponded to the primary peaks of the mixed traces at these loci. The second profile (profile II) for each strain was inferred by subtracting the sequence of profile I from the mixed sequence; in most cases, the alleles of the second profile corresponded to alleles identified previously for other strains. The only “mixed” locus in the C. helveticus strain RM4087 was aspA. Interestingly, the aspA allele not obtained after either separation attempt was represented by the dominant profile in the mixture and was identical to the C. upsaliensis aspA allele aspA6.

TABLE 7.TABLE 7.
Allele profiles and sequence types for the separated alleles of strains RM1908, RM2816, RM3949, and RM4048a

Putative lateral transfer among thermotolerant Campylobacter species. All alleles identified in this study were queried against the Campylobacter jejuni/coli MLST database. The C. coli alleles at all seven loci were identical to alleles in this database (Table 3). The one exception was C. coli RM2225 aspA, which was approximately 88% identical to the four other C. coli aspA alleles identified in our study but was identical to C. jejuni aspA103. Phylogenetic analyses (data not shown) identified two groups of alleles at each locus in the Campylobacter MLST database; an additional group (group III) was identified at the atpA and pgm loci (Table 8). The members of one group (group I or group II) are, on average, about 86% identical to members of the other group. One group of alleles (group II, Table 8) is associated predominantly with C. coli. With the exception of RM2225 aspA, all of the identified C. coli alleles, including the remaining RM2225 alleles, are members of group II. Phenotypic and immunochemical tests indicated that strain RM2225 was a C. coli isolate (data not shown); therefore, RM2225 is another example of a C. coli strain which contains both C. jejuni and C. coli MLST loci.

TABLE 8.TABLE 8.
Divergent alleles in the Campylobacter MLST databasea

The MLST loci of the other three species characterized in this study have much less similarity to C. jejuni MLST loci (78 to 79% nucleotide identity). Therefore, it is noteworthy that C. lari RM4110 pgm11 was identical to the C. jejuni allele pgm110. The pgm110J allele is a member of pgm group III (Table 8), a tertiary group of pgm alleles identified in the Campylobacter MLST database. Group III is only 80 to 81% identical to group I (“C. jejuni”) alleles and 77 to 79% identical to group II (“C. coli”) alleles. Significantly, the remaining C. lari pgm alleles characterized in this study, such as RM2819 pgm5, which is 99.4% identical to C. jejuni pgm108, are >94% identical to other group III alleles. These results strongly suggest that the group III pgm alleles originated in C. lari. Additionally, they also suggest that the typed strains in the MLST database containing these alleles may have resulted from lateral transfer events between C. jejuni and C. lari.

Based on the above results, it was possible that MLST might reveal lateral transfer events between the four non-C. jejuni species. Therefore, pairwise BLAST combinations of all alleles were performed. Two groups of C. helveticus pgm alleles were identified: those with approximately 86% identity to C. upsaliensis pgm alleles, similar to the nucleotide identity at the other six loci, and pgm alleles with approximately 96% nucleotide identity to C. upsaliensis pgm alleles. Thus, these results suggest that lateral transfer events may have occurred between C. upsaliensis and C. helveticus at the pgm locus. However, no other significant identities were observed at any other loci.

DISCUSSION

A multilocus sequence typing method was developed previously for C. jejuni (12). Although this method has been used successfully to characterize C. jejuni strains and identify clonal lineages within the species (6, 11, 13, 43, 60), it cannot characterize strains from other, clinically relevant Campylobacter species (e.g., C. coli and C. upsaliensis), nor can it address interspecies genetic exchange within the genus. Therefore, an expanded MLST typing system was developed, encompassing four additional species: C. coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. helveticus. Where possible, the same housekeeping genes used in the C. jejuni MLST method were incorporated into the expanded method. This was feasible for C. coli and C. helveticus; however, it was necessary to substitute adk and pgi for aspA and gltA in C. lari and for gltA and pgm in C. upsaliensis.

A large number of alleles at each locus were identified in C. lari and C. upsaliensis relative to the number of strains analyzed (Table 2). Despite the small number of C. helveticus strains, several alleles were also identified at each locus in this species (Table 2); based on the number of identified alleles at each locus, the potential number of allele combinations (i.e., C. helveticus STs) is predicted to be at least 56,000. In contrast, relatively few alleles were identified in C. coli. Considering that a similar number of C. coli and C. upsaliensis isolates were characterized, approximately four times more alleles were identified in C. upsaliensis, suggesting that C. upsaliensis is more genotypically diverse than C. coli. Nonetheless, the majority of C. coli strains (38/56; 68%) contained unique STs, indicating that these seven loci are sufficient to type this species. In fact, the majority of strains typed in this study contained unique STs.

In the absence of codon usage bias, the rate of synonymous base substitution (which does not change the amino acid) in genes should equal the neutral substitution rate; nonsynonymous base substitutions (which change the amino acid) would be caused and maintained presumably by positive selection. Therefore, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous base substitutions (dn/ds) is an indicator of potential positive selection; such positive selection might make a gene unsuitable for MLST. By calculating the dn/ds ratio, Dingle et al. (12) demonstrated that the MLST loci in their typing scheme were not subject to positive selection. The dn/ds values for C. coli (0 to 0.173), C. lari (0 to 0.047), and C. upsaliensis (0.008 to 0.097) (Table 2) are consistent with those described previously for C. jejuni (0.028 to 0.059 [12] and 0.008 to 0.093 [11]). The values for C. helveticus are higher for some loci (Table 2) but are less than 1 in all cases. These results indicate that, as with C. jejuni, the MLST loci of the other four species are not subject to positive selection. The ability of the primer sets to amplify and sequence strains of each species from a variety of clinical and environmental sources, sufficient genotypic variation at each of the seven MLST loci, and the absence of positive selection all demonstrate that the expanded MLST method is a suitable typing scheme. Additionally, although the primer sets described by Dingle et al. (12) are sufficient to type C. jejuni isolates, the primer sets described in this method can be used also to amplify and sequence C. jejuni alleles (Table 1).

For C. coli and C. lari, there was no correlation between sequence or allele type and strain source (e.g., clinical versus environmental). A correlation with source could not be made with C. helveticus either since all of the strains were feline isolates. However, six clonal complexes were identified for C. upsaliensis (Table 5): the ST-42 complex, comprised exclusively of clinical isolates from South Africa; the ST-45 and ST-50 complexes, comprised exclusively of clinical isolates from Belgium and France; and the ST-16, ST-35, and ST-64 complexes, comprised primarily of isolates from household pets. UPGMA analysis of the C. upsaliensis allele profiles identified two distinct genogroups (Fig. 2). With one exception (RM4123, isolated in the United Kingdom), genogroup II is comprised of the South African, Belgian, and French isolates.

Several groups of strains with identical STs were found in C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis (e.g., STC-1058, STL-6, and STU-12; Tables 3 to 5). For some of these groups, e.g., STC-1058, the strains were all isolated from one location during the same year. However, the strains in many groups were isolated over the course of several years (STL-6, 7 years) or from widely separated geographical locations (STC-889). Additional typing will be required to determine if these groups represent prevalent Campylobacter strains. C. coli strains RM3230 and RM3232 have identical STs. Both strains are swine isolates from Australia. Investigation of the strain background for RM3232 indicated that this isolate was most likely RM3230, further illustrating the power of MLST to identify identical strains.

The ability to source track isolates from both sporadic and outbreak cases is a goal for most prokaryotic typing systems. The large number of alleles and STs in C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. helveticus would suggest that source tracking may be possible with MLST, although the potential of source tracking in C. lari and C. helveticus cannot be adequately addressed in this study due to the small set of typed isolates. All of the C. upsaliensis isolates were obtained from patients with campylobacteriosis or from domestic pets. While this precludes tracking these clinical isolates back to a food or water source, it does illustrate the potential use of MLST to investigate the zoonotic transmission of C. upsaliensis. As described above, C. upsaliensis is commonly isolated from domestic dogs and cats; therefore, handling of these animals, especially by children, is one possible mode of transmission for this organism. Labarca et al. (37) found that C. upsaliensis isolates recovered from a patient with gastroenteritis and dogs living in the same household had different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns; similar results were obtained after typing these isolates by MLST (STU-19, STU-25, and STU-27; Table 5). However, the stool specimens from the pets were obtained several months after C. upsaliensis was isolated from the owner; therefore, it is unclear, due to the lag between the isolation of the two sample sets, if the gastroenteritis was a result of zoonotic transmission. In contrast to C. upsaliensis, no correlation in C. coli between ST and either location/date of isolation or source was found, suggesting that source tracking might not be possible in C. coli with our MLST loci. Another possibility is that the number of C. coli strains typed in this study was, again, inadequate to address the potential of source tracking by MLST. This appears to be the case. In a related study, over 500 chicken, turkey, swine, and cattle C. coli isolates were typed using the MLST method described here. Several alleles were found to be predominantly associated with either chicken or swine isolates (W. G. Miller, unpublished data), suggesting that source tracking by MLST may be possible in C. coli.

It is noteworthy that all C. upsaliensis genogroup II strains (with the possible exception of RM4123) were isolated using a filtration protocol with no antibiotic selection (27, 44), referred to as the Cape Town Protocol filtration method (41), whereas most of the isolates in C. upsaliensis genogroup I were isolated on agar amended with cefoperazone or cephalothin. In contrast to many strains in genogroup I, strain RM3195 (isolated by filtration) is highly sensitive to cefoperazone (21). This suggests that the strains in genogroup II have increased cefoperazone sensitivity and that genogroups I and II are both genotypically and phenotypically distinct. The existence of two groups of C. upsaliensis strains has been confirmed also by additional genotypic and phenotypic data (C. K Fagerquist et al., unpublished data; R. E Mandrell et al., unpublished data). The existence of a C. upsaliensis subpopulation, more likely to be isolated by non-antibiotic selection methods (e.g., filtration), suggests that additional subpopulations of other Campylobacter species (e.g., C. jejuni and C. coli) remain undetected due to the almost universal use of antibiotic selection media. The possibility that subpopulations of strains are not being isolated has important implications for the identification of virulence factors, the sources of antibiotic resistance, and accurate epidemiology.

In addition to MLST, other typing methods, such as PFGE and AFLP analyses, have been described for Campylobacter (50). Although PFGE is used commonly as a typing method in Campylobacter (http://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/), the results are more prone to subjective interpretation and lab-to-lab variation than results from other, sequence-based methods. To compare our MLST method to existing typing methods, we typed a representative subset of C. upsaliensis strains by AFLP and compared the interstrain relationships derived from the two methods. The correlation between interstrain relationships inferred by MLST and AFLP analyses has been noted previously with a comparison of methods previously described for C. jejuni (63). We noted a similar correlation between our MLST and AFLP results for C. upsaliensis. All strains studied gave unique types in both methods. Furthermore, the cluster analyses of data derived from each method detected the same degree of relatively close, or also distant but discernible, interstrain relationships among strains. Strains assigned to the same ST complex also shared a high level of AFLP profile similarity. The results were epidemiologically significant, with strains in AFLP cluster 1 dominated by strains from the United States and those in cluster 2 dominated by South African isolates. These data validate both MLST and AFLP as complementary genotyping methods that have applicability in evaluating both epidemiological and genealogical relationships of Campylobacter spp. and demonstrate the relationship between the genotype and phylotype of strains.

Two additional benefits of the expanded MLST method were revealed in this study, i.e., detection of presumed “pure” cultures containing two strains of the same species and lateral transfer of DNA between Campylobacter species. We had reported previously that well-isolated single colonies could contain two strains, observed after plating mixtures of two fluorescence-tagged C. jejuni strains (47). Additionally, mixed cultures containing multiple strains representing different Campylobacter species have been reported previously (16, 56, 67). Obviously, mixed cultures, containing strains of different species, can be detected readily by other, less labor-intensive methods, such as PCR. However, detecting mixtures of the same species is very difficult without prior knowledge of the genotypes or phenotypes of the strains composing the mixture, as the differences between the strains are likely to be minor; however, in some instances, mixed cultures of the same species can be detected when the component strains have noticeably different colony morphologies (38). The ability to identify the presence of mixed cultures is important since it has obvious implications in both outbreak source tracking and monitoring of antibiotic resistance, as well as basic strain characterization. Therefore, it is very important to ensure that pure cultures have been obtained for characterization. Five mixed cultures, representing all four species, were clearly detected by the MLST system developed in this study. Four of the strains were environmental isolates, obtained from animals or seawater (Table 7). Environmental samples, as opposed to clinical samples, might be expected to contain multiple strains of the same species; therefore, special care should be taken when purifying strains from such samples. It is also relevant that one well-isolated, single colony of the C. lari strain RM2816 remained mixed, even after sonication and vortexing, illustrating the difficulty of separating mixed cultures. Although pure cultures of C. upsaliensis were obtained from “strains” RM3949 and RM4048, the secondary strain in each mixture could not be isolated. One explanation is that the secondary strain represented a minor proportion of the mixture. However, it was determined previously that mixtures in a ratio of greater than 4:1 cannot be detected by DNA sequencing, since the secondary peaks become indistinguishable from the background (data not shown). Therefore, it is unlikely that MLST would identify a mixture in which the primary strain was in >8-fold excess. A more probable explanation is that the secondary strains did not survive the sonication process or that they grew much more slowly on the BAB medium. Two strains, annotated originally as C. upsaliensis and C. helveticus, were determined in this study to be C. jejuni (data not shown). Since a number of well-characterized tests for C. jejuni exist and would have been used on these strains, it is also possible that the original cultures were mixed and eventually outgrown, during multiple passages, by minor C. jejuni subpopulations in the mixtures. Similar results with other Campylobacter mixtures have been seen previously (M. Englen, personal communication).

Multilocus sequence typing can also detect putative lateral transfer events between species. Expansion of the C. jejuni MLST to five Campylobacter species presents a unique opportunity to monitor genetic exchange between multiple species within the genus. Detection of such events between C. jejuni and C. coli has been reported previously (45, 63). In fact, 55 STs in the Campylobacter MLST database are composed of both “C. jejuni” and “C. coli” alleles. In 22 of these STs, the sole “C. coli” allele is atpA17, an allele strongly associated with the C. jejuni ST-61 complex. The potential association of this allele with C. coli has been noted previously (11, 12, 45, 63). It is likely that all of the group II alleles (Table 8) present in the database are derived from C. coli, due to the identity or near-identity to C. coli alleles or C. coli alleles characterized previously or in this study. Interestingly, C. lari alleles are also present apparently in the MLST database (group III: pgm100J, pgm108J, pgm109J, and pgm110J); the C. lari pgm allele pgm11L is identical to pgm110J. The atpA56J allele is also a group III allele (Table 8). BLAST analysis indicates that it is most related (89% identity) to the atpA alleles from the urease-positive C. lari strains RM3659, RM3660, and RM3661 (data not shown); however, the low identity suggests that this allele may belong to either a divergent C. lari genogroup or another species related to C. lari. The presence of only two C. lari-related loci in the C. jejuni MLST database likely precludes the possibility of these alleles being characterized via accidental typing of one or more C. lari isolates and suggests rather that these alleles are present in C. jejuni as a result of lateral transfer. Other than these group II and III alleles, no other potential lateral transfer events were detected in this study, with the exception of putative C. upsaliensis pgm (and possibly aspA) alleles in C. helveticus.

The small number of putative lateral transfer events detected in this study may reflect the relatively small sample size for each of the five species as well as the expected low frequency for such events. Additional lateral transfer events are likely to be identified as more strains are typed by this method. The small number of identified putative lateral transfer events may also reflect local synteny around each of the seven MLST loci. Presumably, the absence of conserved flanking genes would decrease the likelihood of recombination at each locus. Characterization of synteny between C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis strains is facilitated by the existence of closed genomes for the first three species and a draft genome for the fourth (21; W. G. Miller et al., unpublished data). Of course, an important qualification is that there might be significant differences in synteny between the sequenced strains and other strains from the same species, especially species with a high degree of inherent variation, such as C. lari. Nevertheless, the gene order around the seven MLST loci is very similar in the sequenced C. coli strain RM2228 and either of the two sequenced C. jejuni genomes (NCTC 11168 and RM1221). Conversely, the regions around the MLST loci in C. lari strain RM2100 and C. upsaliensis strain RM3195 are not very syntenic with similar regions in either C. jejuni or C. coli; in most cases, the breakpoint in gene order is either immediately adjacent to or within one gene of the MLST gene. This difference in synteny among species may explain the large number of C. coli alleles and the relatively small number of C. lari and C. upsaliensis alleles present in the Campylobacter MLST database. However, a few non-C. jejuni/coli atpA and pgm alleles described in this study have been identified in the C. jejuni MLST database. atpA is the middle gene in the atpFFHAGDC locus. Unlike the other six MLST loci, this extended locus is highly conserved among the four sequenced species; therefore, one might expect a higher frequency of allelic exchange at the atpA locus. Although the gene order downstream of pgm in C. jejuni and the urease-negative C. lari strain RM2100 is well conserved, the gene order upstream is not. However, the group III pgm alleles are most similar to the pgm alleles from the urease-positive C. lari strains. Therefore, it is possible that the upstream gene order at the pgm locus is more conserved between urease-positive C. lari strains and C. jejuni. Similar differences in synteny have been observed in C. lari at other loci (W. G. Miller, unpublished data). These results suggest also that genetic exchange of MLST genes between two species might be confined to small subsets of strains within those species.

This study describes an expanded multilocus sequence typing method for five Campylobacter species. While the expanded method will efficiently characterize these pathogenic, emerging campylobacters, the five-species MLST method will also prove useful in identifying both lateral transfer between Campylobacter species and mixed cultures. Allele and profile data from this study are available online (http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/, http://pubmlst.org/clari/, http://pubmlst.org/cupsaliensis/, and http://pubmlst.org/chelveticus/). Therefore, as more strains, both clinical and environmental, from these species become available, they can be compared readily to existing members of the database. Finally, while this method characterizes mainly the thermotolerant Campylobacter species (i.e., C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis), preliminary data suggest that this expanded method can be expanded further still. The atpA and glyA primer sets were used to amplify successfully genomic DNA from eight additional Campylobacter species (C. fetus, C. hyointestinalis, C. sputorum, C. mucosalis, C. concisus, C. curvus, C. showae, and C. lanienae). Noteworthy is the identification of a mixed C. mucosalis culture and the presence of a C. jejuni glyA allele (glyA27) in C. showae, suggesting that an MLST method encompassing all members of the genus can provide useful insights into Campylobacter biology and evolution.

TABLE 4.TABLE 4.
Allele numbers, sequence types, and lineages for C. lari isolates (n = 19)a
Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service CRIS project 5325-42000-041, and supports a U.S. collaboration in the European Commission Fifth Framework Project QLK1-CT-2002-0220, “CAMPYCHECK.” A.J.L. is indebted to the South African Medical Research Council and the University of Cape Town for financial support.

We thank M. Englen, R. Meinersmann, R. Harvey, L. Stanker, P. Vandamme, I. Wesley, and the California Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, Calif., for the generous contribution of strains for this study. We thank Kenn Kristiansen, Nina Helene Langhoff, Anna Bates, and John Michael Janda, Jr., for technical assistance and Berit Siemer for Genescan analysis and data collation of AFLP data. We also thank Craig Parker and Jeffery McGarvey for critical reading of the manuscript.

This publication made use of the Campylobacter MultiLocus Sequence Typing website (http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/) developed by Keith Jolley and sited at the University of Oxford (32). The development of this site has been funded by the Wellcome Trust.

REFERENCES
1.
Altekruse, S. F., N. J. Stern, P. I. Fields, and D. L. Swerdlow. 1999. Campylobacter jejuni—an emerging foodborne pathogen. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:28-35. [PubMed].
2.
Atanassova, V., and C. Ring. 1999. Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in poultry and poultry meat in Germany. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 51:187-190. [PubMed].
3.
Baker, J., M. D. Barton, and J. Lanser. 1999. Campylobacter species in cats and dogs in South Australia. Aust. Vet. J. 77:662-666. [PubMed].
4.
Berndtson, E., M. L. Danielsson-Tham, and A. Engvall. 1996. Campylobacter incidence on a chicken farm and the spread of Campylobacter during the slaughter process. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 32:35-47. [PubMed].
5.
Berndtson, E., M. Tivemo, and A. Engvall. 1992. Distribution and numbers of Campylobacter in newly slaughtered broiler chickens and hens. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 15:45-50. [PubMed].
6.
Best, E. L., A. J. Fox, J. A. Frost, and F. J. Bolton. 2004. Identification of Campylobacter jejuni multilocus sequence type ST-21 clonal complex by single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2836-2839. [PubMed].
7.
Bopp, D. J., B. D. Sauders, A. L. Waring, J. Ackelsberg, N. Dumas, E. Braun-Howland, D. Dziewulski, B. J. Wallace, M. Kelly, T. Halse, K. A. Musser, P. F. Smith, D. L. Morse, and R. J. Limberger. 2003. Detection, isolation, and molecular subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Campylobacter jejuni associated with a large waterborne outbreak. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:174-180. [PubMed].
8.
Broczyk, A., S. Thompson, D. Smith, and H. Lior. 1987. Water-borne outbreak of Campylobacter laridis-associated gastroenteritis. Lancet i:164-165.
9.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2004. Preliminary FoodNet data on the incidence of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food—selected sites, United States, 2003. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 53:338-343.
10.
Coker, A. O., R. D. Isokpehi, B. N. Thomas, K. O. Amisu, and C. L. Obi. 2002. Human campylobacteriosis in developing countries. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8:237-244. [PubMed].
11.
Colles, F. M., K. Jones, R. M. Harding, and M. C. Maiden. 2003. Genetic diversity of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from farm animals and the farm environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:7409-7413. [PubMed].
12.
Dingle, K. E., F. M. Colles, D. R. A. Wareing, R. Ure, A. J. Fox, F. E. Bolton, H. J. Bootsma, R. J. L. Willems, R. Urwin, and M. C. J. Maiden. 2001. Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:14-23. [PubMed].
13.
Duim, B., P. C. Godschalk, N. van den Braak, K. E. Dingle, J. R. Dijkstra, E. Leyde, J. van der Plas, F. M. Colles, H. P. Endtz, J. A. Wagenaar, M. C. Maiden, and A. van Belkum. 2003. Molecular evidence for dissemination of unique Campylobacter jejuni clones in Curacao, Netherlands Antilles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5593-5597. [PubMed].
14.
Endtz, H. P., J. S. Vliegenthart, P. Vandamme, H. W. Weverink, N. P. van den Braak, H. A. Verbrugh, and A. van Belkum. 1997. Genotypic diversity of Campylobacter lari isolated from mussels and oysters in The Netherlands. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 34:79-88. [PubMed].
15.
Engberg, J., P. Gerner-Smidt, F. Scheutz, E. Moller Nielsen, S. L. On, and K. Molbak. 1998. Water-borne Campylobacter jejuni infection in a Danish town—a 6-week continuous source outbreak. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 4:648-656. [PubMed].
16.
Englen, M. D., and P. J. Fedorka-Cray. 2002. Evaluation of a commercial diagnostic PCR for the identification of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 35:353-356. [PubMed].
17.
Engvall, E. O., B. Brandstrom, L. Andersson, V. Baverud, G. Trowald-Wigh, and L. Englund. 2003. Isolation and identification of thermophilic Campylobacter species in faecal samples from Swedish dogs. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 35:713-718. [PubMed].
18.
Evans, M. R., R. J. Roberts, C. D. Ribeiro, D. Gardner, and D. Kembrey. 1996. A milk-borne campylobacter outbreak following an educational farm visit. Epidemiol. Infect. 117:457-462. [PubMed].
19.
Evans, S. J., and A. R. Sayers. 2000. A longitudinal study of campylobacter infection of broiler flocks in Great Britain. Prev. Vet. Med. 46:209-223. [PubMed].
20.
Feil, E. J., B. C. Li, D. M. Aanensen, W. P. Hanage, and B. G. Spratt. 2004. eBURST: inferring patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from multilocus sequence typing data. J. Bacteriol. 186:1518-1530. [PubMed].
21.
Fouts, D. E., E. F. Mongodin, R. E. Mandrell, W. G. Miller, D. A. Rasko, J. Ravel, L. M. Brinkac, R. T. DeBoy, C. T. Parker, S. C. Daugherty, R. J. Dodson, A. S. Durkin, R. Madupu, S. A. Sullivan, J. U. Shetty, M. A. Ayodeji, A. Shvartsbeyn, M. C. Schatz, J. H. Badger, C. M. Fraser, and K. E. Nelson. 2005. Major structural differences and novel potential virulence mechanisms from the genomes of multiple Campylobacter species. PLoS Biol. 3:e15. [PubMed].
22.
Friedman, C. R., R. M. Hoekstra, M. Samuel, R. Marcus, J. Bender, B. Shiferaw, S. Reddy, S. D. Ahuja, D. L. Helfrick, F. Hardnett, M. Carter, B. Anderson, and R. V. Tauxe. 2004. Risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infection in the United States: a case-control study in FoodNet sites. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:(Suppl. 3):S285-S296. [PubMed].
23.
Friedman, C. R., J. Neimann, H. C. Wegener, and R. V. Tauxe. 2000. Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections in the United States and other industrialized nations, p. 121-138. In I. Nachamkin and M. J. Blaser (ed.), Campylobacter. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
24.
Frost, J. A., I. A. Gillespie, and S. J. O'Brien. 2002. Public health implications of campylobacter outbreaks in England and Wales, 1995-9: epidemiological and microbiological investigations. Epidemiol. Infect 128:111-118. [PubMed].
25.
Gilbert, C., and M. Slavik. 2004. Determination of toxicity of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from humans and from poultry carcasses acquired at various stages of production. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97:347-353. [PubMed].
26.
Goossens, H., B. A. Giesendorf, P. Vandamme, L. Vlaes, C. Van den Borre, A. Koeken, W. G. Quint, W. Blomme, P. Hanicq, D. S. Koster, et al. 1995. Investigation of an outbreak of Campylobacter upsaliensis in day care centers in Brussels: analysis of relationships among isolates by phenotypic and genotypic typing methods. J. Infect. Dis. 172:1298-1305. [PubMed].
27.
Goossens, H., B. Pot, L. Vlaes, C. Van den Borre, R. Van den Abbeele, C. Van Naelten, J. Levy, H. Cogniau, P. Marbehant, J. Verhoef, et al. 1990. Characterization and description of “Campylobacter upsaliensis” isolated from human feces. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:1039-1046. [PubMed].
28.
Goossens, H., L. Vlaes, M. De Boeck, B. Pot, K. Kersters, J. Levy, P. De Mol, J. P. Butzler, and P. Vandamme. 1990. Is “Campylobacter upsaliensis” an unrecognised cause of human diarrhoea? Lancet 335:584-586. [PubMed].
29.
Holme, R. 2003. Drinking water contamination in Walkerton, Ontario: positive resolutions from a tragic event. Water Sci. Technol. 47:1-6.
30.
Ikram, R., S. Chambers, P. Mitchell, M. A. Brieseman, and O. H. Ikam. 1994. A case control study to determine risk factors for campylobacter infection in Christchurch in the summer of 1992-3. N. Z. Med. J. 107:430-432. [PubMed].
31.
Jacobs-Reitsma, W. F. 1995. Campylobacter bacteria in breeder flocks. Avian Dis. 39:355-359. [PubMed].
32.
Jolley, K. A., M. S. Chan, and M. C. Maiden. 2004. mlstdbNet—distributed multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) databases. BMC Bioinformatics 5:86. [PubMed].
33.
Jolley, K. A., E. J. Feil, M. S. Chan, and M. C. Maiden. 2001. Sequence type analysis and recombinational tests (START). Bioinformatics 17:1230-1231. [PubMed].
34.
Kalman, M., E. Szollosi, B. Czermann, M. Zimanyi, and S. Szekeres. 2000. Milkborne campylobacter infection in Hungary. J. Food Prot. 63:1426-1429. [PubMed].
35.
Kokotovic, B., and S. L. On. 1999. High-resolution genomic fingerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli by analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 173:77-84. [PubMed].
36.
Kumar, S., K. Tamura, I. B. Jakobsen, and M. Nei. 2001. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics 17:1244-1245. [PubMed].
37.
Labarca, J. A., J. Sturgeon, L. Borenstein, N. Salem, S. M. Harvey, E. Lehnkering, R. Reporter, and L. Mascola. 2002. Campylobacter upsaliensis: another pathogen for consideration in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:E59-E60. [PubMed].
38.
Lastovica, A. J., E. Le Roux, and J. L. Penner. 1986. Mixed infections with different species and serotypes of Campylobacter. J. Infect. Dis. 154:375. [PubMed].
39.
Lastovica, A. J., and M. B. Skirrow. 2000. Clinical significance of Campylobacter and related species other than Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli, p. 89-120. In I. Nachamkin and M. J. Blaser (ed.), Campylobacter. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
40.
Lauwers, S., B. Hofman, M. Seghers, R. Van Etterijck, A. Van Zeebroeck, F. de Smet, and D. Pierard. 1991. An outbreak of C. upsaliensis in a day care center. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis 4:(Suppl.):S90.
41.
Le Roux, E., and A. J. Lastovica. 1998. The Cape Town protocol: how to isolate the most campylobacters for your dollar, pound, franc, yen, etc., p. 30-33. In A. J. Lastovica, D. G. Newell, and E. E. Lastovica (ed.), Campylobacter, helicobacter, & related organisms. Institute of Child Health, Cape Town, South Africa.
42.
Logue, C. M., J. S. Sherwood, L. M. Elijah, P. A. Olah, and M. R. Dockter. 2003. The incidence of Campylobacter spp. on processed turkey from processing plants in the midwestern United States. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95:234-241. [PubMed].
43.
Manning, G., C. G. Dowson, M. C. Bagnall, I. H. Ahmed, M. West, and D. G. Newell. 2003. Multilocus sequence typing for comparison of veterinary and human isolates of Campylobacter jejuni. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:6370-6379. [PubMed].
44.
Megraud, F., and Z. Elharrif. 1985. Isolation of Campylobacter species by filtration. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 4:437-438. [PubMed].
45.
Meinersmann, R. J., K. E. Dingle, and M. C. Maiden. 2003. Genetic exchange among Campylobacter species. Genome Lett. 2:48-52.
46.
Meinersmann, R. J., C. M. Patton, G. M. Evins, I. K. Wachsmuth, and P. I. Fields. 2002. Genetic diversity and relationships of Campylobacter species and subspecies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:1789-1797. [PubMed].
47.
Miller, W. G., A. H. Bates, S. T. Horn, M. T. Brandl, M. R. Wachtel, and R. E. Mandrell. 2000. Detection on surfaces and in Caco-2 cells of Campylobacter jejuni cells transformed with new gfp, yfp, and cfp marker plasmids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:5426-5436. [PubMed].
48.
Miller, W. G., and R. E. Mandrell. Prevalence of Campylobacter in the food and water supply: incidence, outbreaks, isolation and detection, p. 101-163. In M. E. Konkel and J. M. Ketley (ed.), Campylobacter: molecular and cellular biology. Horizon Scientific Press, Norwich, United Kingdom, in press.
49.
Neal, K. R., and R. C. Slack. 1995. The autumn peak in campylobacter gastro-enteritis. Are the risk factors the same for travel- and UK-acquired campylobacter infections? J. Public Health Med. 17:98-102. [PubMed].
50.
Newell, D. G., J. A. Frost, B. Duim, J. A. Wagenaar, R. H. Madden, J. van der Plas, and S. L. W. On. 2000. New developments in the subtyping of Campylobacter species, p. 27-44. In I. Nachamkin and M. J. Blaser (ed.), Campylobacter. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
51.
Newell, D. G., and J. A. Wagenaar. 2000. Poultry infections and their control at the farm level, p. 497-510. In I. Nachamkin and M. J. Blaser (ed.), Campylobacter. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
52.
Notario, R., N. Borda, T. Gambande, and E. Sutich. 1996. Species and serovars of enteropathogenic agents associated with acute diarrheal disease in Rosario, Argentina. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 38:5-7. [PubMed].
53.
On, S. L., and C. S. Harrington. 2000. Identification of taxonomic and epidemiological relationships among Campylobacter species by numerical analysis of AFLP profiles. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 193:161-169. [PubMed].
54.
Pebody, R. G., M. J. Ryan, and P. G. Wall. 1997. Outbreaks of campylobacter infection: rare events for a common pathogen. Commun. Dis. Rep. Rev. 7:R33-R37.
55.
Prasad, K. N., A. K. Dixit, and A. Ayyagari. 2001. Campylobacter species associated with diarrhoea in patients from a tertiary care centre of north India. Indian J. Med. Res. 114:12-17. [PubMed].
56.
Rautelin, H., J. Jusufovic, and M. L. Hanninen. 1999. Identification of hippurate-negative thermophilic campylobacters. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 35:9-12. [PubMed].
57.
Ronveaux, O., S. Quoilin, F. Van Loock, P. Lheureux, M. Struelens, and J. P. Butzler. 2000. A Campylobacter coli foodborne outbreak in Belgium. Acta Clin. Belg. 55:307-311. [PubMed].
58.
Rosenquist, H., N. L. Nielsen, H. M. Sommer, B. Norrung, and B. B. Christensen. 2003. Quantitative risk assessment of human campylobacteriosis associated with thermophilic Campylobacter species in chickens. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 83:87-103. [PubMed].
59.
Sails, A. D., B. Swaminathan, and P. I. Fields. 2003. Clonal complexes of Campylobacter jejuni identified by multilocus sequence typing correlate with strain associations identified by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4058-4067. [PubMed].
60.
Sails, A. D., B. Swaminathan, and P. I. Fields. 2003. Utility of multilocus sequence typing as an epidemiological tool for investigation of outbreaks of gastroenteritis caused by Campylobacter jejuni. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4733-4739. [PubMed].
61.
Savill, M., A. Hudson, M. Devane, N. Garrett, B. Gilpin, and A. Ball. 2003. Elucidation of potential transmission routes of Campylobacter in New Zealand. Water Sci. Technol. 47:33-38.
62.
Schorr, D., H. Schmid, H. L. Rieder, A. Baumgartner, H. Vorkauf, and A. Burnens. 1994. Risk factors for Campylobacter enteritis in Switzerland. Zentbl. Hyg. Umweltmed. 196:327-337.
63.
Schouls, L. M., S. Reulen, B. Duim, J. A. Wagenaar, R. J. Willems, K. E. Dingle, F. M. Colles, and J. D. Van Embden. 2003. Comparative genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by amplified fragment length polymorphism, multilocus sequence typing, and short repeat sequencing: strain diversity, host range, and recombination. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:15-26. [PubMed].
63a.
Siemet, B. L., E. M. Nielsen, and S. L. W. On. 2005. Identification and molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter coli isolates from human gastroenteritis, food, and animal sources by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis and Penner stereotyping. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:1953-1958. [PubMed].
64.
Stanley, J., A. P. Burnens, D. Linton, S. L. On, M. Costas, and R. J. Owen. 1992. Campylobacter helveticus sp. nov., a new thermophilic species from domestic animals: characterization, and cloning of a species-specific DNA probe. J. Gen. Microbiol. 138:2293-2303. [PubMed].
65.
Tam, C. C., S. J. O'Brien, G. K. Adak, S. M. Meakins, and J. A. Frost. 2003. Campylobacter coli—an important foodborne pathogen. J. Infect. 47:28-32. [PubMed].
66.
Van Doorn, L. J., A. Verschuuren-Van Haperen, A. Van Belkum, H. P. Endtz, J. S. Vliegenthart, P. Vandamme, and W. G. Quint. 1998. Rapid identification of diverse Campylobacter lari strains isolated from mussels and oysters using a reverse hybridization line probe assay. J. Appl. Microbiol. 84:545-550. [PubMed].
67.
Waino, M., D. D. Bang, M. Lund, S. Nordentoft, J. S. Andersen, K. Pedersen, and M. Madsen. 2003. Identification of campylobacteria isolated from Danish broilers by phenotypic tests and species-specific PCR assays. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95:649-655. [PubMed].