skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 061735  
Title: REASONABLE DOUBT
Journal: POLICE MAGAZINE  Volume:2  Issue:6  Dated:(NOVEMBER 1979)  Pages:18-26
Author(s): D C ANDERSON
Corporate Author: Criminal Justice Publications, Inc
United States
Publication Date: 1979
Pages: 9
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: THE EDITOR OF POLICE MAGAZINE DESCRIBES HIS EXPERIENCE AS A MEMBER OF A JURY IN A CASE OF ARMED ROBBERY AND HIS SUBSEQUENT INTERVIEWS WITH THE JUDGE, POLICE OFFICERS, AND ATTORNEYS INVOLVED.
Abstract: AFTER A LENGHTY SELECTION PROCESS, THE JURY WAS CHOSEN AND CHARGED WITH DECIDING IF JOSE DIAZ HAD PARTICIPATED IN A FOUR-MAN ROBBERY OF A HISPANIC BAR IN THE WILLIAMSBURG SECTION OF BROOKLYN. A BARMAID IDENTIFIED THE DEFENDANT, BUT HER TESTIMONY DIFFERED ON SOME POINTS FROM THAT OF THE POLICE OFFICERS WHO HAD APPREHENDED THE SUSPECT. JOSE DIAZ STATED THAT HE HAD BEEN A CUSTOMER IN THE BAR AND WAS INNOCENT, BUT HE WAS UNABLE TO EXPLAIN DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN HIS TESTIMONY AND THAT OF OTHER WITNESSES. THE JURY DELIBERATED FOR ALMOST 2 DAYS WITH THE MAJORITY MOVING TOWARD ACQUITTAL. THEY FINALLY RETURNED A VERDICT TO ACQUIT ON THE FIRST DEGREE COUNTS, BUT WERE UNABLE TO REACH CONSENSUS ON THE SECOND DEGREE ROBBERY, LARCENY, AND POSSESSION CHARGES. AFTER THE TRAIL ENDED, THE JURORS LEARNED THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS ALREADY SERVING A SENTENCE FOR ARMED ROBBERY. THE JUDGE HAD RULED NOT TO PERMIT DISCLOSURE OF THIS INFORMATION BECAUSE IT COULD PREJUDICE THE JURY. WHEN INTERVIEWED, THE ATTORNEYS AND POLICE OFFICERS INVOLVED IN THE CASE EXPRESSED SUPRISE THAT THE DEFENDANT HAD NOT BEEN CONVICTED. JOSE DIAZ COULD NOT BE LOCATED FOR AN INTERVIEW. THE CASE IS USED AS AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE INEPTNESS OF THE TRIAL PROCESS IN HANDING DOWN CONCRETE JUSTICE. FOLLOWING INTERVIEWS WITH THE MAJOR TRIAL ACTORS, THE AUTHOR IS CONFUSED AS TO THE CORRECTNESS OF THE JURY DECISION, AS MUCH SO AS IF THE TESTIMONY HAD NOT BEEN HEARD AND DEBATED. THE ISSUE OF GROUP DECISIONMAKING IS ALSO RAISED. (MJM)
Index Term(s): Testimony ; Multiple charges ; Criminal proceedings ; Jury decisionmaking
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=61735

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder