ATAG 2.0 Tester (Author) Template (Form) A01-2 - for Success Criterion A.0.1-2

This form is divided into four parts: Part 1 - General Information, Part 2 - General Questions, Part 3 - Specific Questions, and Part 4 - Supplemental Questions. NOTE: If you need any additional help (for example, how to fill out this form) in order to answer any of the questions following, please access (site to be developed).

Part 1 - General Information

This part (1) contains background information to help you in completing the form.

DISCLAIMER: The submitter bears all responsibility for the accuracy of the data entered. The data entered on this form may be reviewed by the W3C AUWG, and will be made public. You should be familiar with all documents referenced from this form (if possible) before completing this form.

Answers to all questions are required (except for those questions marked OPTIONAL - OPTIONAL questions refer to information gathering on possible usage of ATAG techniques in satisfying the normative requirements)(however, you may refer to answers on other forms you have completed, if you wish, for efficiency's sake). If you feel a question is not applicable to testing an authoring tool, just write "not applicable" and specify why the question is not applicable. If you need additional ATAG information (including access to the ATAG2.0 specification and ATAG2.0 techniques (reference to be provided)) to complete this form, you may go to the ATAG site. If you need additional WAI testing resources, go to the WAI site. For additional information on quality assurance in relation to filling out this form, please consult the W3C Quality Assurance Site. Please submit this form to (site to be developed-see Test Report Collection Site example) or email to Tim Boland NIST as a short-term interim).

After submitting this form, you may proceed directly to the Tester Form for Success Criterion A.2.5-2, or back to the main ATAG test page. It is possible that some results may be machine-reportable, in which case the developer should have noted this information on the developer's entry, and relevant machine-reportable results could be linked from this entry. In this case, please provide (links to)(brief descriptions of) appropriate references (please choose formats of references from well-known reporting formats, if possible) . There are no other dependencies on other tester forms for filling out this form. Thank you.

TEST PURPOSE:

To evaluate an authoring tool according to SCA.0.1-2

TEST AGAINST:

Success Criterion A.0.1-2 -

Any component of an authoring tool that is accessed by the author within a web browser must conform to WCAG Level AA.

Part 2 - General Questions (ref: ATAG2.0 Conformance Profile?)

This part (2) asks for information about you and the authoring tool being tested.

Name of Tester (Author):




Date and Version of Specifications Tested Against (include ATAG and WCAG as appropriate):




Address of Tester/Author(s):




Email of Tester/Author(s):




Phone Number(s) of Tester/Author(s):




Fax# of Tester/Author(s):




Authoring Tool Tested (please be specific) - category of authoring tool, format(s) output from authoring tool, and platform that authoring tool uses) (please indicate if you believe authoring tool has Web-based or non-Web-based user interface components, and if authoring tool has preview features):




Have you accessed the actual developers entry (if available) for this particular authoring tool and success criterion? If so, do you have any questions on any of that information? It is not necessary (but desirable) for the developer to have submitted an entry for the authoring tool you are testing.




Part 3 - Specific Test Questions for Success Criterion A.0.1-2

This part (3) contains the actual test questions. First there are some INVESTIGATION tasks specified to provide preparation for answering questions AFTER THE INVESTIGATION. In answering these test questions, you may have access to information on the developers' entry as described .

INVESTIGATION:

  1. What components accessed by Web browsers did you find for this particular authoring tool? How was each component accessed? (NOTE: MAY WANT TO STOP AT THIS POINT TO GET INFORMATION NECESSARY TO ANSWER FOLLOWING QUESTIONS, AND RETURN TO FORM AT THIS POINT!)(may require authoring actions)



  2. What browsers did you use to access these components? (NOTE: MAY WANT TO STOP AT THIS POINT TO GET INFORMATION NECESSARY TO ANSWER FOLLOWING QUESTIONS, AND RETURN TO FORM AT THIS POINT!)(may require authoring actions)



AFTER THE INVESTIGATION:

If no components accessed by you within a Web browser were found for the authoring tool, please proceed to the point after questions following.

(NOTE: The WCAG 2.0 WD (per "WCAG20 Succ.." text following) is under development. Please consult the WCAG WG resource for more information.) Please answer the following questions for each component x from INVESTIGATION previous: (NOTE: "x" following loops from 1 to n (where n greater than equal to 1), so in your answers you would need to specifically link x to information pertaining to x)

  1. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 1.1? If so, how? If not, how not?





  2. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 1.2? If so, how? If not, how not?





  3. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 1.3? If so, how? If not, how not?





  4. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 1.4? If so, how? If not, how not?




  5. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 2.1? If so, how? If not, how not?





  6. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 2.2? If so, how? If not, how not?





  7. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 2.3? If so, how? If not, how not?





  8. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 2.4? If so, how? If not, how not?






  9. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 2.5? If so, how? If not, how not?





  10. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 3.1? If so, how? If not, how not?





  11. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 3.2? If so, how? If not, how not?





  12. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 4.1? If so, how? If not, how not?





  13. Were all WCAG20 level 1 and 2 conformance requirements met for x for WCAG20 Success Criterion 4.2? If so, how? If not, how not?





Continue

  1. If you determined that there were no components of the authoring tool accessed by you within a Web browser, explain why there were none?


  2. What test procedure did you use for SCA.0.1-2? What test environment did you use for SCA.0.1-2?


  3. SUMMARY QUESTION: Objectively, from your perspective as tester, did this authoring tool "pass" ("yes" or "N/A" answers to all non-OPTIONAL Part 3 questions AFTER THE INVESTIGATION) ATAG2.0 Success Criterion A.0.1-2? If yes, why? If not, why not? (please be specific)


Part 4 - Supplemental Questions

This part (4) asks for supplemental information of interest to the ATAG2.0 test suite maintainers.

Please give any other information you feel may be helpful (please be specific):




Please comment on the quality of the questions asked and/or the specification/techniques (please be specific):




What other questions do you feel might be helpful? Do you have any bugs/issues with this form? (please be specific)




Date of completion of this form (template):




Thank you very much! Your evaluation will be saved and made publicly available.