From grand_wazoo@geocities.com Fri Feb 28 11:41:02 1997 Return-Path: grand_wazoo@geocities.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00305 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:41:01 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA05578; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:41:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from mufasa.agn.net(160.79.1.12) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma005574; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:41:06 -0500 Received: from pool71-SEMichigan2.AGN.NET by Mufasa.AGN.NET with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #23) id m0w0VIg-000MCrC; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:36 WET From: grand_wazoo@geocities.com (The Grand WaZoo) To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Changes to telephony charges.... Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 16:41:47 GMT Organization: none of your business.... Reply-To: grand_wazoo@geocities.com Message-ID: <33180a98.172662614@mufasa.agn.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99g/16.339 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 62 This is a ridiculous situation... lurking in the darkness.... From SCHWARDNER@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:42:11 1997 Return-Path: SCHWARDNER@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00310 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:42:11 -0500 From: SCHWARDNER@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA05508; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:38:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout01.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.92) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma005494; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:38:37 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout01.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id LAA14810 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:38:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:38:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228113813_787137092@emout01.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Phone Company Charges for Internet! Content-Length: 548 It has come to my attention that my local phone company has filed with the FCC to allow charges for local phone calls utilizing internet access. I want to voice my objection to this course of action. Why should someone utilizing the internet pay extra for local phone usage as compared to someone who simply makes a lot of local phone calls to friends. I really don't think that internet users will take down the phone system with overuse. I think that phone companies are trying to make a buck. Please let me voice be heard. Steven Schwartz From HENNIGH@PSL.NMSU.EDU Fri Feb 28 11:42:12 1997 Return-Path: HENNIGH@pslibm.psl.nmsu.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00313 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:42:11 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA05470; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:37:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from relay1.uu.net(192.48.96.5) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma005465; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:37:22 -0500 Received: from pslibm.psl.nmsu.edu by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (peer crosschecked as: psl.NMSU.Edu [128.123.15.6]) id QQcewg07973; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:36:55 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Received: from default by pslibm.psl.nmsu.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:34:02 MST From: "Keith Hennigh" To: "ispc fcc" Cc: "Jim O'Neill" Subject: Respnse to the proposed telephone rate increase to internet providers Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:34:46 -0700 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 423 Is it necessary to get the government involved in strongarming the ISP's to cough up more money ? I don't believe so. I think the government tends to mess the situation up. The phone companies are trying to get a larger piece of pie. The ISP's are already paying for their links. If the locals need more cash to stay on the air, they should try to raise their rates. If competition is allowed, we should get a fair deal. From sampcohd@nceye.net Fri Feb 28 11:42:12 1997 Return-Path: sampcohd@nceye.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00316 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:42:12 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA05416; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:36:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from relay1.uu.net(192.48.96.5) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma005413; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:35:51 -0500 Received: from taz.nceye.net by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (peer crosschecked as: taz.nceye.net [206.154.21.2]) id QQcewg07552; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:35:22 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 23024 invoked from network); 28 Feb 1997 16:34:34 -0000 Received: from pm1s3.nceye.net (206.154.21.33) by taz.nceye.net with SMTP; 28 Feb 1997 16:34:34 -0000 Received: by pm1s3.nceye.net with Microsoft Mail id <01BC256A.F5585820@pm1s3.nceye.net>; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:31:37 -0500 Message-ID: <01BC256A.F5585820@pm1s3.nceye.net> From: "Curtis E. Holloman" To: "'isp@fcc.gov'" Subject: Response to NOI Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:29:33 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 330 Dear Commission: Please understand that i do not support the proposal which would allowe = the telephone companies to charge a surcharge for internet connection = via its telephone lines. I would appreciate a response to this message. = Thank you very much. Curtis E. Holloman Post Office Box 383 Clinton, NC 18329 910/596-0707 From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:42:12 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00319 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:42:12 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA05321; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:33:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma005318; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:33:20 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id IAA04460 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:32:57 -0800 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:32:57 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702281632.IAA04460@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: rupert@northrim.net Subject: Form Data from 206.206.31.77 Content-Length: 730 Date: Fri Feb 28 08:32:57 PST 1997 = P.O. Box 2781 city = Twin Falls comments = I feel that by imposing separate charges for internet use, it would be double jeopardy..We are already paying for phone time and do not want to be charged double. email = rupert@northrim.net name = Bonnie J. Gentry regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = ID statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 83303-2781 From ariannas@hotmail.com Fri Feb 28 11:42:13 1997 Return-Path: ariannas@f25.hotmail.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00322 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:42:12 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA05074; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:25:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from f25.hotmail.com(207.82.250.36) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma005069; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:25:19 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by f25.hotmail.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) id IAA17017; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:24:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:24:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199702281624.IAA17017@f25.hotmail.com> Received: from 205.177.58.10 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:24:46 PST X-Originating-IP: [205.177.58.10] From: " Sarah Arianna" To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: internet phone charges, NOT!! Content-Type: text/plain Content-Length: 332 I have one comment to make about this proposal from the phone company, Don't they make enough money off of us already?????? NO MORE INTERNET CHARGES!!!!!! --------------------------------------------------------- Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------- From rellett@thevision.net Fri Feb 28 11:42:13 1997 Return-Path: rellett@thevision.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00325 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:42:13 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA05129; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:27:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from vs1.invsn.com(204.216.26.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma005124; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:27:19 -0500 Received: from mpeywdzn (ds1_13.invsn.com [204.216.26.113]) by vs1.invsn.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id IAA18158 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:26:53 -0800 Message-Id: <199702281626.IAA18158@vs1.invsn.com> From: "Rob & Patty Ellett" To: Subject: per minute charges Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:28:15 -0800 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 289 you, the fcc, ma bell or whoever thinks they are due more of my $ will be in for the big surprise when and if a per minute charge is applied. we, the public power house, can and will find a service provider that wants us for more than the all-mighty $. do not do it. rellett@thevision.net From rashid@acd.ucar.edu Fri Feb 28 11:42:13 1997 Return-Path: rashid@acd.ucar.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00328 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:42:13 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA04802; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:17:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from acd.ucar.edu(128.117.136.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma004799; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:16:48 -0500 Received: by acd.ucar.edu (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA30076; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:16:24 -0700 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:16:24 -0700 From: rashid@acd.ucar.edu (Rashid Khosravi) Message-Id: <9702281616.AA30076@acd.ucar.edu> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: internet charges Content-Length: 456 Dear Members of the FCC: I am very very strongly against the per-minute charges which the local phone companies are trying to impose on internet use. This will severly diminish our usage of this invaluable resource for education and gathering information. On behalf of my family and friends, I am therefore urging you to please reject this proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, Rashid Khosravi (a frequent user and a concerned citizen of the internet) From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:42:14 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00331 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:42:14 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA04900; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:20:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma004893; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:20:03 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id IAA01837 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:19:40 -0800 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:19:40 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702281619.IAA01837@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: gordon@northrim.net Subject: Form Data from 206.206.31.81 Content-Length: 570 Date: Fri Feb 28 08:19:40 PST 1997 address = 526 Monte Vista city = Twin Falls comments = email = gordon@northrim.net name = Gordon Carter regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = Idaho statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 83301 From griz@ldd.net Fri Feb 28 11:42:14 1997 Return-Path: griz@ldd.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00334 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:42:14 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA04896; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:20:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from cdale3.midwest.net(204.248.40.16) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma004891; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:19:39 -0500 Received: from sikeston2.midwest.net (sikeston2.midwest.net [205.242.25.11]) by cdale3.midwest.net (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA04208 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:18:41 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:18:41 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <2.2.16.19970228101848.0b5f3e2e@ldd.net> X-Sender: griz@ldd.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@fcc.gov From: Shane Grissom Subject: NO FEES Content-Length: 515 I think the nations telephone service suppliers should concentrate their combined efforts, on providing a truly digital internet infrastructure, not on squeezing out MORE profits from an old antiquated analog system (that has not been radically changed in more than a three decades, I might add...), and that has paid for itself probably 20 times over... Thank you for your consideration... ------------------------- Shane Grissom 1617 Oak Lane Cape Girardeau, Mo. 573-339-0257 ------------------------- From Phhphoto@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:42:15 1997 Return-Path: Phhphoto@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00337 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:42:14 -0500 From: Phhphoto@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA04760; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:16:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout13.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.39) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma004755; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:15:58 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout13.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id LAA06909 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:15:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:15:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228111534_-1941672562@emout13.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: docket 96-263 Content-Length: 737 re docket 96-263 i am strongly opposed to the proposals being put forward by local telephone companies which advocate the imposition of per minute usage fees on telephone lines being used to provide access to the internet. my local telephone company already imposes charges for local service as well as a per call fee for each local call. they should not be entitled to impose additional fees. furthermore, this would have a serious detrimental effect on access and use of the internet, which benefits individuals and organizations worldwide. this very correspondence is facilitated by the fact that it is being transmitted over the internet. please do not sanction these fees. peter hay halpert 513 east 86th st # 2b ny ny 10028 From greywolf@nashville.net Fri Feb 28 11:42:15 1997 Return-Path: greywolf@nashville.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00340 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:42:15 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA04957; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:22:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from eve.telalink.net(199.1.88.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma004951; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:21:45 -0500 Received: from greywolf (pm3-04-dyn4-198.nash.telalink.net [207.152.4.198]) by eve.telalink.net (MTA-v3.5/5.6n) with SMTP id KAA13167 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:21:50 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <331705C1.4191@nashville.net> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:21:19 -0600 From: "John C. Peden" X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Proposed Internet Access Fees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 629 I would like to express my opposition to the additional Internet access fees that are being proposed. Personally, I have an ISDN line that was installed as my primary internet access vehicle. While this was my personal choice to add the additional line to my residence, I feel that people who can't afford a dedicated line should be penalized. The telephone companies should be investing in more up to date technologies rather than expanding their older networks. If other, better alternatives were more widely available, then some of the load would be taken off the analog system. Thank you for your attention, John Peden From shadowcat@webtv.net Fri Feb 28 11:42:15 1997 Return-Path: shadowcat@webtv.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00343 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:42:15 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA04780; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:16:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailsorter-1.isp.alma.webtv.net(205.180.153.85) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma004774; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:16:34 -0500 Received: from mailtod-102.bryant.webtv.net (mailtod-102.iap.bryant.webtv.net [207.79.35.82]) by mailsorter-1.alma.webtv.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA23107; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:16:10 -0800 (PST) Received: (from production@localhost) by mailtod-102.bryant.webtv.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA11131; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:16:09 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199702281616.IAA11131@mailtod-102.bryant.webtv.net> From: shadowcat@webtv.net (Barbara Hanson) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:16:09 -0700 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 (WebTV 1.0) Content-Length: 730 Gentlemen: This letter is to protest the proposed rate hikes and per-minute fees requested by local phones companies. Their claims that internet usage ties up existing lines is spurious at best, and is a last-ditch attempt to get on the bandwagon and get as much money as they can from the consumer. This request, if granted, will limit and in some cases curtail use of the internet by nearly everyone. I know I could never have done the amount of research that I have been able to do for my job, and for my own personal enjoyment, if I had to fork over a per-minute fee to my phone company. Please, use your best judgement in favor of the consumer, and deny this request! Barbara A. Hanson 1501 E. Iowa Dr. Tucson AZ 85706 From Matt.Smith@EMAIL.ALLIED.com Fri Feb 28 11:43:26 1997 Return-Path: Matt.Smith@EMAIL.ALLIED.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00350 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:25 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA04782; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:16:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from tmpil001.tmp.allied.com(198.80.19.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma004771; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:16:19 -0500 Received: by tmpil001.tmp.allied.com id AA05296 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for isp@fcc.gov); Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:15:54 -0700 Received: by tmpil001.tmp.allied.com (Internal Mail Agent-1); Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:15:54 -0700 Message-Id: From: "Smith, Matt (Microage)" To: "'isp@fcc.gov'" Subject: FW: For your info Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:14:42 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.57 Encoding: 49 TEXT Content-Length: 1547 People are totally against this and will fight this all the way! We pay enough taxes for everything else in the world, and for you to try and tack on something similar for the internet which started out as a FREE service is not right! People pay their phone bills and the phone companies better just deal with it. Why should we have to pay a special tax just for the way we use it! >---------- >From: CTC Email Support >Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 1997 4:05 PM >To: CTC Staff >Subject: FW: For your info > > > >Subject: For your info > >I am writing you this to inform you of a very important matter >>currently >>under review by the FCC. Your local telephone company has filed a >>proposal with the FCC to impose per minute charges for your internet >>service. They contend that your usage has or will hinder the operation >>of the telephone network. >> >>It is my belief that internet usage will diminish if users were >>required >>to pay additional per minute charges. The FCC has created an email box >>for your comments, responses must be received by February 13, 1997. >>Send >>your comments to isp@fcc.gov and tell them what you think. >> >>Every phone company is in on this one, and they are trying to sneak it >>in just under the wire for litiagation. Let everyone you know here this >> >>one. Get the e-mail address to everyone you can think of. >> >>isp@fcc.gov >> >>Please forward this email to all your friends on the internet so all >>our >>voices may be heard! >> >>Rob Jorgensen >>Ohio, USA >>onear15@alpha.wcoil.com > > From mbunzel@texoma.net Fri Feb 28 11:43:26 1997 Return-Path: mbunzel@texoma.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00353 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:26 -0500 From: mbunzel@texoma.net Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA04784; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:16:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.texoma.net(205.229.106.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma004772; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:16:20 -0500 Received: from ppp0426.texoma.com (ppp0426.texoma.com [206.65.113.154]) by mail.texoma.net (8.8.4/Internet_Texoma_961204) with SMTP id KAA27605 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:15:54 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:15:54 -0600 (CST) Posted-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:15:54 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <1.5.4.16.19970228101343.25271874@texoma.net> X-Sender: mbunzel@texoma.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: equal-access@texoma.net Subject: Re: ...Please EVOTE --- Very, Very Imporant... Content-Length: 1669 No I don't on all issues At 11:52 AM 2/10/97 -0600, you wrote: >Folks, > >Do you want to pay by the minute to the phone company when calling Internet >Texoma or another Internet service provider? > > > >Do you want to pay up to $150/month to the telephone companies for the new >phone service (ISDN)? > > > >Do you want to pay long distance rates to the phone companies when you call >across town using the new ISDN service if you have the old telephone service? > > > >Do you want equal access for rural Texas, including Texomaland? > > > >Should the current limit of 50,000 phone lines in a city be changed to 5,000 or >10,000 in order to have ISDN service? > > > >---cut here and send the above, along with >---your personal message and full name in a reply--- > >We need at least 2,500 emails today and tomorrow in support of this campaign. >At this time, we now have 121 EVOTES of support received in the last 12 >hours. > >We need 2,400 more EVOTES. Please EVOTE on this issue. > >To EVOTE, simply reply to this email and it will be "automagically" sent to: > >isp@fcc.gov >WOOD, PATRICK (CHAIRMAN), wood@puc.state.tx.us >GEE, ROBERT (COMMISSIONER), gee@puc.state.tx.us >ALSH, JUDY. (COMMISSIONER), walsh@puc.state.tx.us >WILLEY, Judy.(Comm. Recept.), willey@puc.state.tx.us > >We need your help in lobbying the Federal Communications Commission and the >Texas Public Utilities Commission (Texas PUC), and we need your support today. > >Without your support, we may not win the fight and we will all lose a part of >the future. > >Sincerely, > >Larry Vaden, founder and CEO >Internet Texoma, Inc. >bringing the real Internet to rural Texomaland > > > From KingDavidX@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:43:26 1997 Return-Path: KingDavidX@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00356 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:26 -0500 From: KingDavidX@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA04688; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:14:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout02.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.93) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma004685; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:14:17 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout02.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id LAA25638 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:13:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:13:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228111353_-1574126758@emout02.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Additional per -minute charge on Internet service? Content-Length: 557 This is wrong!! First of all, I use the telephone no less than I did before. If anything I use it more to call the places I find through the internet to do business with. I would without a doubt discontinue to have internet service were there an additional per-minute charge on it. Internet service is FAR too overpriced as it is. It was created to be free afterall.. This proposal is ridiculous and a ploy for more money from the greedy telephone companies who want into the public's wallets in every way possible. David Snyder KingDavidX@aol.com From jrt2@ix.netcom.com Fri Feb 28 11:43:27 1997 Return-Path: jrt2@ix.netcom.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00359 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:26 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA04507; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:05:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com(206.214.98.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma004500; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:05:32 -0500 Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id KAA17957 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:05:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from unknown(206.152.33.44) by dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma011821; Fri Feb 28 08:49:19 1997 Message-ID: <3316EFEF.46E3@ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:47:11 -0800 From: "James R. Taylor" Reply-To: jrt2@ix.netcom.com Organization: Triad Systems Corp. X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: TelePhone Charges Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 397 The proposal that the FCC has received from the phone service companies = to charge a per minute fee for local internet charges is a great = dis-service to myself and everyone I associate with. = This will cause the Information Highway to totally stop growth and = in-fact lose momentum. = Please do NOT allow this concept for more revenue from an existing = service = -- = GIF87a=BB From Deborah.McIntosh@chirondiag.com Fri Feb 28 11:43:27 1997 Return-Path: Deborah.McIntosh@chirondiag.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00362 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:27 -0500 From: Deborah.McIntosh@chirondiag.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id KAA03931; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:44:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from relay2.uu.net(192.48.96.7) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma003925; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:44:45 -0500 Received: from brixton by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP (peer crosschecked as: [207.78.114.129]) id QQcewc05244; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:44:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from cclink.chirondiag.com by brixton (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA17006; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:45:34 -0500 Received: from ccMail by cclink.chirondiag.com (IMA Internet Exchange 2.01 Enterprise) id 3170AF80; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:42:32 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:37:54 -0600 Message-ID: <3170AF80.@chirondiag.com> Subject: no charges for phone internet service To: isp@fcc.gov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part Content-Length: 119 I strongly disagree with the proposal of charging for internet phone service. Deb McIntosh From jphilips@flash.net Fri Feb 28 11:43:27 1997 Return-Path: jphilips@flash.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00365 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:27 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id KAA03970; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:46:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from endeavor.flash.net(208.194.223.40) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma003966; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:45:58 -0500 Received: from default (lpm1-39.flash.net [208.194.199.39]) by endeavor (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA26672 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:42:44 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199702281542.JAA26672@endeavor> From: "James H. Phillips " To: Subject: Per minute charges Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:40:31 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1288 If it is not too late, I would like to register my vote against the phone companies attempt to once again control how much of our takehome they get. The internet providers are providing a vital service at an affordable price unlike the phone companies. Just like everything else the big businesses get into they beg, buy, or steal from the little guy at the governments blessing. I am sick of it. I would like the phone companies to provide the services they tauted years ago at the prices they promised and then we could talk about the internet hurting their business. IT IS TIME FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO WAKE UP! It is the people who you should be listening to, not the fat cats that are destroying the fabric of our country for the sake of the bottom line. Do you honestly believe the employees would benefit? No! It would be the officers on their fat contracts and majority stake stockholders that would benefit. My name is James H. Phillips Jr, residing at 147 Indian Springs Dr., Alexander, AR 72002-3012. I would be very happy to hear from you that you have decided to let the people have this one and tell the phone companies to take their record profits and return some of their overpricing to the customers. PAY ATTENTION! PEOPLE ARE GETTING SICK OF THIS AND TAXES! From fireplug@digitalwebsat.com Fri Feb 28 11:43:28 1997 Return-Path: fireplug@digitalwebsat.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00368 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:27 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id KAA03836; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:39:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(207.238.82.11) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma003832; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:39:12 -0500 Received: from DEFAULT (DEFAULT [207.238.82.205]) by mail1.digitalwebsat.com (NTMail 3.02.10) with ESMTP id oa001964 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:36:36 +0000 From: "Robert Thomas" To: Subject: per minute charge Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:37:43 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <15363597602641@digitalwebsat.com> Content-Length: 128 Please do not add a per minute charge. The phone companies already charge too much for their services they provide. thank you From WVinzant@ix.netcom.com Fri Feb 28 11:43:28 1997 Return-Path: WVinzant@ix.netcom.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00371 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:28 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id KAA03706; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:35:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com(206.214.98.7) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xmaa03703; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:35:15 -0500 Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA27529 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:34:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from hay-ca6-41.ix.netcom.com(206.214.147.105) by dfw-ix7.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma027467; Fri Feb 28 09:34:16 1997 Message-ID: <33168ABD.87A@ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:36:27 +0000 From: Warren Vinzant Reply-To: WVinzant@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Electronic Submission Only Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2492 NOTE: THIS IS A SECOND ATTEMPT TO SEND THIS MESSAGE. Regarding CC Docket No. 96-263: Local telephone companies should not be allowed to assess interstate access charges against Internet Service Providers, or in any way require the payment of time-related charges against internet related use of the present public switched network. As a technical professional with a personal and business interest in seeing the internet continue to grow, I have a particularly unique perspective regarding the Local Telephone Company request for access charges. The vitality of the internet has grown only in the environment of unlimited fixed price access. The commecial attraction to the internet rides strictly on the amount of exposure that a given internet presence provides to the Web Page owner/service provider. In the present environment, internet users can explore the Web at their leisure, and for unlimited time. While exploring the Web, they have no pressures to stop exploring due to the cost of the time spent on the activity. This provides an environment in which more Web sites are seen by every user, therefore expanding the exposure of a Web Page owner/service provider.This is like "window shopping". In a general marketplace such as this, people do not pay to window shop. In an environment in which the Web user must "watch the clock", users will only go on line to quickly perform known existing operations, and will do so only with known web service providers. The ability to attract new business through advertising on the web, and gaining exposure through user exploration will be reduced significantly. An excellent example of what happens in the time-charged environment is the situation in Europe. Europe is FAR behind the US in internet activity precisely because of the excesively high charges for local telephone access to the internet. For the most part these countries have recognized that there is a significant problem that is holding them back from this important new technological arena, and THEY ARE TRYING TO REVERSE THE EXACT SITUATION THAT THE ACCESS CHARGES HERE WOULD CREATE! Charging access fees or allowing other time related charges will destroy the internet. It will damage a new and important area of commerce, perhaps irreparably. It would put the US behind the rest of the world in a strategic technology. Any efforts to allow these charges should be rejected. Thank you for your attention Warren Vinzant 2419 Irma Way Castro Valley CA 94546 From n.joydavid@ellijay.com Fri Feb 28 11:43:55 1997 Return-Path: n.joydavid@ellijay.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00374 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:28 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id KAA03631; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:31:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(206.30.220.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma003628; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:31:34 -0500 Received: from LOCALNAME by ellijay.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA24667; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:26:53 -0500 Message-ID: <33172419.51E1@ellijay.com> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:29:45 -0800 From: DAVID EARL SEWELL Organization: JOY X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Win16; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fcc Subject: (no subject) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2127 >Return-Path: mike@bae.uga.edu >From: Michael Gundlach >Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: warning]] (fwd) >To: noah99@mindspring.com >Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:06:41 -0500 (EST) > >According to Jennifer Gundlach: >>From gundy@arches.uga.edu Mon Feb 24 21:29 EST 1997 >Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 21:29:34 -0500 (EST) >From: Jennifer Gundlach >X-Sender: gundy@archa7.cc.uga.edu >To: skip@bae.uga.edu >cc: losburn@stc.net, david@bae.uga.edu, fkesler@berry.edu, mike@bae.uga.edu, > arturo@vivanet.com >Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: warning]] (fwd) >Message-ID: >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >Content-Length: 1147 > > > >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 09:07:02 -0500 (EST) >From: Heather Samson >To: Melissa Boespflug , > Katherine Perry , > Elizabeth Sekerak , > Shannon Bement >Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: warning]] (fwd) >Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 09:36:47 EST >Resent-From: "PERRY, KATHERINE MARSH" >Resent-To: > >--------------------------- Original Message --------------------------- > > >-------------------------------- >FORWARDED FROM: Jacobs, Merav > >>Apparently there is a nasty bug making the rounds on the Internet via >>E-Mail. If you see the message titled "Penpal Greetings!" DO NOT OPEN >>IT. DELETE IT IMMEDIATELY. If you open the message to read it, the >>virus will be activated in your computer system and will delete all of >>the information on your hard drive, after replicating and forwarding >>itself to everyone listed in your E-mail address book. >> >>Please do all of your online friends a favor and forward this >>information. > > > > > > > > > >-- >Michael Gundlach mike@bae.uga.edu. >Web Page: http://www.bae.uga.edu/other/mike/ > What has four legs and an arm? > From smithe@getnet.com Fri Feb 28 11:43:56 1997 Return-Path: smithe@getnet.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00377 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:56 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id KAA03463; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:23:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from gn2.getnet.com(204.157.9.29) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma003461; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:23:44 -0500 Received: from localhost (smithe@localhost) by getnet.com (8.7.4/8.7.1) with SMTP id IAA16446 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:23:19 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:23:17 -0700 (MST) From: Desertfox To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Per minute phone charges Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Length: 1804 If this is emailed to the wrong address, please forgive me and, if possible, advise me of the correct address to send my concerns. I am writing in response to the proposed per minute phone charges that local telephone companies have put under proposal to the fcc regarding internet use. Obviously, I think the idea of a per minute phone charge for internet use is a terrible idea. I also think it is extortion and illegal. First, let me say that the billing methods for local phone service have been fairly set and normalized for some time. The request to change billing methods; to raise billing methods, based only on what the phone service is being used for represents a great injustice, and in my opinion, an invasion of privacy. Billing methods should be based as they always have been, not on what the device is being used for. Secondly, let me say that here in phoenix, as is probably true in most major cities, telephone deregulation is a major influence. I, personnally feel that this proposal to the fcc is a last ditch effort on the part of the local phone providers to extort more money out of it's customers before their power base is eroded. Here, we have a prominent cable company and probably other companies gearing up to provide local phone service. Obviouly, the existing local phone provider's will experiance a drop in profit margin when deregulation becomes a reality. If this fcc bill should pass, I will certainly switch my phone service to the cable company and let the local phone companies know, that I'm no longer a locked customer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- smithe@getnet.com http://www.getnet.com/~smithe Desertfox ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From tlclark@nettally.com Fri Feb 28 11:43:56 1997 Return-Path: tlclark@nettally.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00380 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:56 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id KAA03505; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:25:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from gossimer.nettally.com(199.44.114.224) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma003498; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:25:41 -0500 Received: from m2-012.ppp.nettally.com ([199.44.114.12]) by gossimer.nettally.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-11170) with SMTP id AAA522 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:25:37 -0500 Message-ID: <331721A0.6CD@nettally.com> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:19:12 -0800 From: tlclark@nettally.com (Clark, Terrence) Reply-To: tlclark@nettally.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win16; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: They made their beds, now make them lie in them. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2039 Dear FCC, I am tired of big business in this country not wanting to spend some its profits to stay on the cutting edge. In the '70 you had car companies that did not care about the quality of their product and foreign companies then started sending over better cars for a lesser price. It has now taken the American car companies a decade to recover. Before that you had the steel mills that did not want to invest profits to up date machinery so they could produse steel at a cheaper cost. So the foreign companies did invest the money to up date and they started producing steel at a lower price. Now we have a lot of steel mills thst are shut down and they are not going to reopen. I realise that the only differnce between these two examples and the phone companies is phone companies do not have to worry about competition from foreign companies. This makes you the equalizer. I am sure that if the foreign companies could they would come in here and buy a smaller company and invest a lot of money to upgrade the equipment. They would then reduce the price to get the market share and then American companies would start sceaming we are losing money. They would start laying off people and demanding grant money so they can get back into the market. Of course they will then sell this idea to you as help save American jobs and if refuse then you look like the bad guy. Please tell the phone companies that they chose to make their equipment to handle short calls and now they are paying the price for lack of vision. Then remind them that if they spent less money on the lobbiests that are before you that they might be closer to developing a new technology that would solve the problem and allow them to recoupe some their losses. Remind them that they are not in a capitalist market because they have very limited competition. I thank you for your time and I hope you have a great weekend. -- Take Care. TLC ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Terrence L. Clark tlclark@nettally.com From agcbalto@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us Fri Feb 28 11:43:56 1997 Return-Path: agcbalto@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00383 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:56 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id KAA03319; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:17:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.bcpl.lib.md.us(204.255.212.10) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma003305; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:17:03 -0500 Received: from LOCALNAME by mail.bcpl.lib.md.us (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA27778; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:15:56 -0500 Message-ID: <331720A7.42AC@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:15:03 -0800 From: "John H. Josselyn" Reply-To: agcbalto@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us Organization: Associated Gun Clubs of Baltimore, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win16; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: PLEASE, DO NOT ALLOW PHONE COMPANIES TO CHARGE INTERNET USERS BY THE MINUTE!!! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 244 The power to tax is the power to contol. The 1st Amendment is not a consumer product to be taxed. -- John H. Josselyn, Legislative V.P. Associated Gun Clubs of Baltimore, Inc. P.O. Box 20102 Towson, MD 21284-0102 (410) 296-3947 (phone & fax) From briggsm@jordan.durham.k12.nc.us Fri Feb 28 11:43:57 1997 Return-Path: briggsm@jordan.durham.k12.nc.us Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00386 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:57 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id KAA03255; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:15:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.interpath.net(199.72.1.13) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma003251; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:15:26 -0500 Received: from mail-pc.fuller.durham.k12.nc.us (mail-pc.fuller.durham.k12.nc.us [206.211.84.15]) by mail.interpath.net (8.8.4/v1.0-cgb) with SMTP id KAA29978 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:13:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pc.fuller.durham.k12.nc.us with Microsoft Mail id <3316F5D9@mail-pc.fuller.durham.k12.nc.us>; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:12:25 EST From: "Briggs, Michael" To: isp@fcc.gov Date: Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:00:00 EST Message-ID: <3316F5D9@mail-pc.fuller.durham.k12.nc.us> Encoding: 5 TEXT X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0 Content-Length: 321 I am a school teacher, I generally do not use e-mail or the internet frivolously. It is for my professional use and if this legislation goes through, I may not be able to afford to continue to do this. Please consider this, and other educators that I am sure would be in the same situation, when a decision is made. From rjay@greatlakes.net Fri Feb 28 11:43:57 1997 Return-Path: rjay@greatlakes.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00389 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:57 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id KAA03318; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:17:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from glwebsvr.greatlakes.net(206.148.103.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma003303; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:17:02 -0500 Received: from net-09.greatlakes.net (net-09.greatlakes.net [206.148.103.89]) by glwebsvr.greatlakes.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA04175 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:11:34 -0500 Message-Id: <1.5.4.16.19970228151836.20e75df8@mail.greatlakes.net> X-Sender: rjay@mail.greatlakes.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:18:36 -0500 To: isp@fcc.gov From: rjay Subject: Access charges to internet users Content-Length: 752 To whom it may concern, Greed, thats what this is all about, if the phone company's start doing this the internet will become no longer for the majority of the people.The rich will be the only one's that will be able to afford it.We already pay for our phone lines so I believe that the phone company's just want a piece of the action.If they start charging per min charges that will be the end of the internet for me and for probablly most everyone else.If you let them do this I think it will be a major mistake.Besides the internet started a long long time ago so why are they starting this mess now. Concerned in michigan, rjay@greatlakes.net From lborg@aros.net Fri Feb 28 11:43:58 1997 Return-Path: lborg@aros.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00392 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:57 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id KAA03102; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:09:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhub.aros.net(207.173.16.17) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma003100; Fri, 28 Feb 97 10:08:47 -0500 Received: from Ed.aros.net (pm4-18.slc.aros.net [207.173.24.115]) by mailhub.aros.net (8.8.5/Unknown) with ESMTP id IAA19708 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:08:22 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199702281508.IAA19708@mailhub.aros.net> From: "Louis Borgenicht" To: Subject: Local phone company charges Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:24:26 -0700 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 451 I have discovered that local phone companies are trying to impose a minute per minute charge for Internet use, thus effectively cutting down individual's ability to use it to communicate or do research on the World Wide Web. I trust the FCC will give due consideration to this issue and not accede to phone companies' wishes. They do not need the money and Internet use does not interfere with phone company operations. Sincerely, Louis Borgenicht From clbh@usa.net Fri Feb 28 11:43:58 1997 Return-Path: clbh@usa.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00395 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:58 -0500 From: clbh@usa.net Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA02740; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:58:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(204.68.24.137) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma002734; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:58:06 -0500 Received: (qmail 21582 invoked by uid 0); 28 Feb 1997 15:00:23 -0000 Received: by netaddress.usa.net via web-mailer (2.0) on Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:58:25 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:58:25 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: the telephone company charging $1.00 per minute for using the internet Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 860 Hello FCC: I am a new user to the internet and just got an update as to the happenings of the telephone company. I have a question. If they are going to charge anything for the use of a phone line that is already being paid for, is this going to be for all phone lines? Are they going to charge for the star-crossed lovers that stay on the phone all night to hear each other breath? Are they going to charge for the time that it takes to get through to the destination that you desire, are they going to charge for the"busy signals" on our personal phone calls. my concern is that the phone company is already charging an exorbinate amount to the public, and to insist on charging more, is dealing into the monopoly that was suppose to have been dealt with years ago. thank you for listening to my concerns. Cassandra L. B. Hubbard New internet person From glassm@athena.ncat.edu Fri Feb 28 11:43:58 1997 Return-Path: glassm@athena.ncat.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00398 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:58 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA02616; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:52:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from diana.ncat.edu(152.8.1.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma002609; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:52:11 -0500 Received: from 152.8.7.62 (152.8.7.62) by athena.ncat.edu (PMDF V5.0-6 #10277) id <01IFY1COG7WG8Y57XP@athena.ncat.edu> for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:51:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:52:20 -0800 From: marihelen glass Subject: FCC Regulation of email To: isp@fcc.gov Message-id: <01IFY1COID2A8Y57XP@athena.ncat.edu> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 Content-Length: 386 Please do not all the phone companies to tack on a per minute charge for the use of Email. This will severely hamper the educational use of this wonderful resource. We already pay a fee to the phone companies to use their lines in our phone bills. The future of having a well trained workforce will be hampered. Please, please don't allow this to happen. Thanks for your support. From a6bf063@west.mc3.edu Fri Feb 28 11:43:59 1997 Return-Path: a6bf063@west.mc3.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00401 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:58 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA02618; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:52:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail3.voicenet.com(207.103.0.45) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma002610; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:52:12 -0500 Received: from west.mc3.edu (west.mc3.edu [207.103.102.3]) by mail3.voicenet.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA12155 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:55:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from MC3_WEST/SpoolDir by west.mc3.edu (Mercury 1.21); 28 Feb 97 09:58:26 EST Received: from SpoolDir by MC3_WEST (Mercury 1.21); 28 Feb 97 09:58:03 EST From: "Antizac" Organization: Montgomery Co. Community College PA To: isp@fcc.gov Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:58:02 EST MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: free internet Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.42a) Message-ID: <48E7FDB1AB4@west.mc3.edu> Content-Length: 391 dont let the phone companies rule over what is owned by the people!! They can't try to charge people for Internet use...they don't own the internet..the people do..never forget that...everyone wants to make money on the internet..but the internet was not set up as a money making opporunity..it was set up in an attempt to make information available to any and everyone who wants it!! From NANCY.DAVIS@spcorp.com Fri Feb 28 11:43:59 1997 Return-Path: NANCY.DAVIS@spcorp.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00404 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:59 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA02448; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:44:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from sp2.spcorp.com(198.16.9.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma002436; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:43:59 -0500 Received: by sp2.spcorp.com id AA15396 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for Isp@fcc.gov); Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:43:31 -0500 Received: by sp2.spcorp.com (Internal Mail Agent-1); Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:43:31 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:16:04 -0500 Message-Id: <316EDC40.1322@inet.spri.sp.com> Return-Receipt-To: NANCY.DAVIS@spcorp.com (NANCY DAVIS) From: NANCY.DAVIS@spcorp.com (NANCY DAVIS) Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 To: Isp@fcc.gov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part Content-Length: 399 The proposal being considered by the FCC to charge telephone users for internet time should not be supported. This would impact on the education system, small business and overall industry as well. Your agency's goal is to protect the consumer--please do not support this proposal. Nancy A. Davis 2000 Galloping Hill Road Kenilworth, NJ 07033 From hobbs@coastalnet.com Fri Feb 28 11:43:59 1997 Return-Path: hobbs@coastalnet.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00407 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:59 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA02506; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:46:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from abaco.coastalnet.com(204.183.40.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma002503; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:46:19 -0500 Received: from edhobbs (pm-gat1-20.coastalnet.com [205.245.117.20]) by abaco.coastalnet.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA11433; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:45:36 -0500 Message-Id: <199702281445.JAA11433@abaco.coastalnet.com> From: "Edward R. Hobbs" To: , "President Clinton" Subject: Opposition to ISP Access Charges Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:59:01 -0500 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01BC251A.F7AB3020" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2255 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01BC251A.F7AB3020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If ISP providers were charged by the minute when we logged on to their server, they would just pass the cost on to the consumer. We are already paying the phone company for our phone line as is the ISP. Many of us even pay for extra phone lines just for this purpose. Also the ISP is paying the phone co. for their ISDN lines as well. Telemarketing companies, other businesses that use their phone lines many hours per day, and even some residential customers who have very high usage don't pay this way so why should ISP's be singled out. I also beleive this would delay & hinder President Clinton's Idea of his Access America Blueprint he spoke of in his State of the Union Address. Please don't allow the phone company monopolies to do this to the taxpayers of this country. Sincerely, Edward R. Hobbs Corapeake, NC hobbs@coastalnet.com ------=_NextPart_000_01BC251A.F7AB3020 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If ISP providers were charged by the = minute when we logged on to their server, they would just pass the cost = on to the consumer. We are already paying the phone company for our = phone line as is the ISP. Many of us even pay for extra phone lines just = for this purpose. Also the ISP is paying the phone co. for their ISDN = lines as well. Telemarketing companies, other businesses that use their = phone lines many hours per day, and even some residential customers who = have very high usage don't pay this way so why should ISP's be singled = out. I also beleive this would delay & hinder President Clinton's = Idea of his Access America Blueprint he spoke of in his State of the = Union Address. Please don't allow the phone company monopolies to do = this to the taxpayers of this country.

Sincerely,
Edward R. = Hobbs
Corapeake, NC
hobbs@coastalnet.com

------=_NextPart_000_01BC251A.F7AB3020-- From ejohnson@catholicherald.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:03 1997 Return-Path: ejohnson@catholicherald.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00410 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:43:59 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA02309; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:38:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from raphael.catholic.org(207.95.245.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma002300; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:38:22 -0500 Received: from ejohnson.catholicherald.com ([208.208.84.2]) by mailhost.catholic.org (8.8.5/COL) with SMTP id IAA05385 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:40:54 -0600 Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19970228143501.00665288@mailhost.catholicherald.com> X-Sender: ejohnson@mailhost.catholicherald.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:35:01 -0500 To: isp@fcc.gov From: "Eric M. Johnson" Subject: Per-minute charges Content-Length: 726 To Whom it May Concern: What business is it of the government if someone transmits data or voice over a telephone line? Are you going to listen in on conversations? Please register my strongest objections to your proposed policy of charging on a per-minute basis for Internet access. I think there must be a better way to improve service. Sincerely, Eric M. Johnson --------------------------------------------------------------- Eric M. Johnson Staff Writer, Arlington Catholic HERALD 703-841-2591 voice ejohnson@catholicherald.com 703-524-2782 fax --------------------------------------------------------------- From broth@execpc.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:04 1997 Return-Path: broth@execpc.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00413 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:03 -0500 From: broth@execpc.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA02132; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:28:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailgate.execpc.com(169.207.16.5) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma002130; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:28:33 -0500 Received: from broth.execpc.com (garion.execpc.com [169.207.9.234]) by mailgate.execpc.com (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id IAA15426 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:28:09 -0600 Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19970228122722.006c4854@mail.execpc.com> X-Sender: broth@mail.execpc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:27:22 -0600 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: ISDN charges Content-Length: 439 Hi! CNET gave out your email address. In Milwaukee, Wisconsin, the rates for ISDN exploded last year. They had been charging a flat rate, about $40/mth. Then they went up to a per minute charge, which makes even AVERAGE use cost about $125-150/mth! Unfortunately, this Ameritech MONOPOLY wants to discourage growth with ISDN and has priced it out of the market. Just wanted to tell somebody. Thanks for being there--- Brett Roth From PetrPanBud@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:04 1997 Return-Path: PetrPanBud@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00416 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:04 -0500 From: PetrPanBud@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA02009; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:23:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout20.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.46) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma002005; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:23:49 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout20.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id JAA00149 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:23:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:23:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228092326_787120627@emout20.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Local phone co. surcharges Content-Length: 609 I am writing to you to express my displeasure at the news that the FCC has approved the first round of applications by local phone companies to surcharge on-line usage. One of the most important aspects of the growth of on-line services and potential future growth is the ability of consumers to access these services at the most competitive rates possible. Surcharges by local phone companies will make that much more difficult. It is in the best interests of the growth of this still fledgling industry to disallow surcharging. Thank you for your consumer-oriented response in this matter. Wendy Rossi From REITINGERK@spacecmd-emh2.army.mil Fri Feb 28 11:44:04 1997 Return-Path: REITINGERK@spacecmd-emh2.army.mil Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00419 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:04 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA02054; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:25:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from spacecmd-emh2.army.mil(158.4.1.6) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma002043; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:25:40 -0500 Received: from [158.4.1.5] by host.spacecmd-emh2.army.mil id aa28678; 28 Feb 97 7:19 CST Received: by SPACECMD-EMH2.ARMY.MIL with Microsoft Mail id <3316EA61@SPACECMD-EMH2.ARMY.MIL>; Fri, 28 Feb 97 07:23:29 mst From: "Reitinger, MAJ Kurt" To: "* JTAGS Europe - Williams, CPT" Subject: FW: March Launches. Date: Fri, 28 Feb 97 06:56:00 mst Message-ID: <3316EA61@SPACECMD-EMH2.ARMY.MIL> Encoding: 162 TEXT X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0 Content-Length: 4562 Please observe but don't report. L4 on the sheet I gave you. Will forward updates to times. R> ---------- From: Stew Stoddart To: Reitinger, MAJ Kurt Cc: wscooke; cookew Subject: Re: March Launches. Date: Friday, February 28, 1997 11:52AM Kurt, Let them archive only, no reporting. I think we are trying to duplicate a real scenario and with the addition of TAWS, we have enough. It has been hard enough getting it straight (we have not on the AF circuit) with only three playing, let alone five. My vote, please NO. Besides, it is not in the SIT plan AND I don't think it will do the shooter any good. More later on that, but I don't think they will be asking for non-reduced now, despite what Stan Nelson broadcasts. Thanks for the update on the other STEW and asking my opinion on EUR. Warm Regards, Stew At 01:06 PM 2/27/97 mst, you wrote: > >1. Don't bother stopping to see Stew unless you've got time to kill or an >interest in Llynx Eye. He's the command's rep for Llynx Eye, and I think >that's why he has an interest in upcoming lauches (not sure exactly why >though). I'm sure he'd share info with you, but I don't get the impression >he plays in more than that. >2. By the way, I'm exploring adding JTAGS-EUR to the mix for L4. I'm >working on finding out for sure if they can see the launch area in mono, and >if they can, I'd like to have them report TDIMF expanded mode as well. Need >to know what both of you think. >Kurt > ---------- >From: Stew Stoddart >To: reitingerk >Cc: cookew >Subject: Re: March Launches. >Date: Friday, February 28, 1997 7:41AM > >Kurt, > >What do you think about meeting with Stew Stout? Should I? Is he willing >to share his sources, etc.? SHIELD does not, at least I have never >received anything from them despite "promises." > >Stew > > >>From: "Stout, Stewart H." >>To: Stew Stoddart >>Subject: Re: March Launches. >>Date: Thu, 27 Feb 97 09:28:00 mst >>Encoding: 71 TEXT >>Content-Length: 2179 >> >> >>Stew, >>If you are in COS come by Army Space and see me. We are located at 1670 N >>Newport Rd, across from the Radison hotel by the old airport, near the >>corner of Fountain and Powers. Come up to the Second floor and have the >>security people call me. Give me a heads up if you think you will come by. >>Stew Stout >> ---------- >>From: Stew Stoddart >>To: Stout, Stewart H. >>Cc: reitingerk; cookew; miller.neal >>Subject: Re: March Launches. >>Date: Thursday, February 27, 1997 2:22PM >> >><> >> --=====================_856966941==_ >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >>Stew, >> >>Good to hear from you. Unfortunately, some of my sources are not with me >>and are classified. But, as far as March is concerned, I am very busy out >>in the South Pacific. Ask Major Reitinger about this one, please. >> >>However, I have recently received the attached Excel 7.0 (WIN95) file of >>scheduled events of interest. Unfortunately, firm dates are generally not >>available until 2-3 weeks prior. Sometimes at WSMR, as you may know, they >>do not become firm most of the time, until the Wednesday before the actual >>launch day. >> >>Thought this might help and be a start. TCMP 2C will be over with by 3 >>Mar. I'll be back in CONUS 4-8 Mar and probably into COS for a day. Maybe >>we could get together. >> >>Warm Regards, >>Stew >> >> >>At 12:22 PM 2/26/97 mst, you wrote: >>> >>>Stew, >>>How does the schedule for March 97 look? >>>Thanks, Stew Stout. >>> >>> >> --=====================_856966941==_ >>Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="Jttpc.xls"; >> x-mac-type="584C5334"; x-mac-creator="5843454C" >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: x-uuencode >>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Jttpc.xls" >> >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> -- >>This uuencoded part of the message containing the file Jttpc.xls has been >>decoded and converted into an attachment. >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> -- >> >> --=====================_856966941==_ >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> >>Stew Stoddart >>Aurora, CO >>1-800-759-8888 >>PIN: 182-1269 >>Phone: (303)-680-5157 >>Fax: (303)-693-1676 >> --=====================_856966941==_-- >> >> >> >Stew Stoddart >Aurora, CO >1-800-759-8888 >PIN: 182-1269 >Phone: (303)-680-5157 >Fax: (303)-693-1676 > > Stew Stoddart Aurora, CO 1-800-759-8888 PIN: 182-1269 Phone: (303)-680-5157 Fax: (303)-693-1676 From REITINGERK@spacecmd-emh2.army.mil Fri Feb 28 11:44:05 1997 Return-Path: REITINGERK@spacecmd-emh2.army.mil Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00422 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:04 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA02047; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:25:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from spacecmd-emh2.army.mil(158.4.1.6) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xmaa02043; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:25:43 -0500 Received: from [158.4.1.5] by host.spacecmd-emh2.army.mil id aa28680; 28 Feb 97 7:19 CST Received: by SPACECMD-EMH2.ARMY.MIL with Microsoft Mail id <3316EA68@SPACECMD-EMH2.ARMY.MIL>; Fri, 28 Feb 97 07:23:36 mst From: "Reitinger, MAJ Kurt" To: "* JTAGS Europe - Williams, CPT" Subject: FW: Updated Support Schedule Date: Fri, 28 Feb 97 06:56:00 mst Message-ID: <3316EA68@SPACECMD-EMH2.ARMY.MIL> Encoding: 52 TEXT, 689 UUENCODE X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0 X-MS-Attachment: SCHUP44.PPT 30720 02-26-1997 19:37 Content-Length: 44048 ---------- From: Stew Stoddart To: cookew; reitingerk; linncs Cc: MTAVIK Subject: Updated Support Schedule Date: Thursday, February 27, 1997 2:21PM [[ SCHUP44.PPT : 1551 in SCHUP44.PPT ]] --=====================_856966866==_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Steve, Kurt and Shane, Attached is an updated support schedule. If Steve and I have our act together, the info attached here should correspond to Steve's msg 270035Z FEB 97. Note changes are in BOLD in the attachments with the changes for L4 being of particular significance. I am hoping that by the time we are done with this activity, we have sorted out our comms "retagging" issues and have more duplicates than we generate collectively. Good work by all, especially CHIP FISHER, and his bunch. TO SUCCESS, THE ONLY THING THEY PAY US FOR! Stewball --=====================_856966866==_ Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="schup44.ppt"; x-mac-type="534C4433"; x-mac-creator="50505433" Content-Transfer-Encoding: x-uuencode Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="schup44.ppt" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- This uuencoded part of the message containing the file schup44.ppt has been decoded and converted into an attachment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- --=====================_856966866==_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Stew Stoddart Aurora, CO 1-800-759-8888 PIN: 182-1269 Phone: (303)-680-5157 Fax: (303)-693-1676 --=====================_856966866==_-- The following binary file has been uuencoded to ensure successful transmission. Use UUDECODE to extract. begin 600 SCHUP44.PPT MT,\1X*&Q&N$`````````````````````/@`#`/[_"0`&```````````````! M`````0``````````$```_O___P````#^____``````````#_____________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M_______________________]_____O___P,````$````!0````8````'```` M"`````D````*````"P````P````-````#@````\````0````$0```!(````3 M````%````!4````6````%P```!@````9````&@```!L````<````'0```!X` M```?````(````"$````B````(P```"0````E````)@```/[___\H````*0`` M`"H````K````+````"T````N````+P```#`````Q````,@```#,````T```` M-0```#8````W````.````#D````Z````_O__________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M_____________________________________________U(`;P!O`'0`(`!% M`&X`=`!R`'D````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````6``4`__________\!````44@$``````#`````````1@`````` M`````````*!'5)Y()+P!_O___P``````````4`!0`#0`,``````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M``H``@'_____`@```/____\````````````````````````````````````` M```````````"````.T@````````%`%,`=0!M`&T`80!R`'D`20!N`&8`;P!R M`&T`80!T`&D`;P!N````````````````````````````````````*``"`/__ M_____________P`````````````````````````````````````````````` M`"<```"D)P`````````````````````````````````````````````````` M````````````````````````````````````````````````____________ M____```````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M````````[=ZM"P0```!%%P``10`Q%SM(``!F`$0`*!<``"@```!Y````6P`` M``$`!```````P!8`````````````$`````````````````"```"`````@(`` M@````(``@`"`@```P,#``("`@````/\``/\```#__P#_````_P#_`/__``#_ M__\`________________________________________________________ M________________________\````/______________________________ M__________________________________________________````#_____ M____________________________________________________________ M_______________Q;"!$________________________________________ M________________________________________\"`@(/______________ M____________________________________________________________ M______\R,2W_________________________________________________ M_______________________________P+3(R________________________ M________________________________________________________\"`@ M(/__________________________________________________________ M______________________DP,S7_________________________________ M_______________________________________________\;V-K______`/ M`/``\`\``/``\/``#P#P\`#P#P`/``\`\`\`\/``\`\`#P#P`/__________ M____________\S$@;___________________________________________ M______________________________________PS("#_____\`\/`/```/`` M\`#P\`#P\`\`#P#P`/#P#P`/#P\`\`\/````\/#P`/`/#P#P#P``#P``#P\/ M___U04P@________________________________________________\/__ M__\/________________________\'=I;/__________________________ M______________________________________________________D)26[_ M____\``/``#_``\````/````\/``\`\`\`\`\`#P\/`/``\`\`\/\`#P`/`/ M``\``/```/`/`/_____W24Q,____________________________________ M____________________________________________\D5!3/_____P```/ M``\`\/`/``#P`/#P#P\````/`/````\/#P``#P#P\`\`#P#P#P`/`/`/#P`/ M#_________1(12#_____________________________________________ M___________________________________P3TX@__\`\`_P#P\`#P#P\`#P M\/`/`/``\`\``/`/#P`/``\/``#P#P\`\``/#P``\`#P#P#P#P`/\/``\/__ M]2!-0?______________________________________________________ M__________________________5.0TC_____________________________ M___________________________________________________S12!/____ M____________________________________________________________ M________________\``0`/______________________________________ M__________________________________________``$`#_____________ M____________________________________________________________ M_______P`!``________________________________________________ M________________________________\``0`/__`/______````_P\`\`#P M\/`/``\/``\`#_______________````_P\``/`/#P``#P#P`/__________ M9`#__P_______P____`/______#___\/```/``_______________P____`/ M__#__P`/\/__\/`/_______P````________________________________ M________________________________________________\````/______ M____________________________________________________________ M______________#_E0#__P`/``___P```/\/`/``\/#P#P`/``\/``______ M_________P```/\/``#P#P\```\`\`#________P````__\/#P`/__\/___P M#______P____#P\/#P#_______________\/___P#__P__\`#_#___#P____ M____]``4`/__________________________________________________ M______________________________L!``#_________________________ M_________________________________________________________V0` M__\`#_____\```#_#P#P`/#P\`\`#P`/#P`/______________\```#_#P`` M\`\/```/`/``#_______\````/__#P______#___\`______\/___P\/#P\` M________________#___\`__\/__``_P___P\`________````#_________ M____________________________________________________________ M___________P`D`"____________________________________________ M____________________________________\````/_P```````````````` M``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````__ M__#-_P'__P\/_____P____`/______#___\/#P\/`/_______________P__ M__`/__#__P`/\/__\/`/_______P````____________________________ M____________________________________________________\````/__ M____________________________________________________________ M__________________````#_\``````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````/___\TE)0__\/#_____\/ M___P#______P____#P\`#P#_______________\/___P#__P__\`#_#___#P M___________U^O______________________________________________ M__________________________________````#_____________________ M____________________________________________________________ M4>I*__\````/`````/#P`/``____________________________________ M________________________\````/______#P#____P___P____________ M__________________________________________________8<_XS_____ M____________________________________________________________ M_______________R4E#_________________________________________ M________________________________________\`B0V?______________ M____________________________________________________________ M______``'._W_ M``#L!H<[`0!$`R`!P/1P".#U```!`0`!``*4!X<[_?\``/P&ASL!`$4+(`$@ M"G`(0`L```$!``$``KP*ASO]_P``M`>'.P$`1`N0]R`*X/Y`"P```0$``0`" M!`N'._W_``#,"H<[`0!$`Y#WP/3@_N#U```!`0`!``),"X<[_?\``!0+ASL! M($&CT/EP_S`&D`D!!``!``$``@````#]_P``7`N'.T$0``=@^G#VH`7@_@$$ M``$``0`"`````/W_```!````!`"?12`!(`%``@``#````#``,``#`$`"```$ M`)]%(`$@`4`"```,````,``P``,`0`(```0`GT4@`2`!0`(```P````P`#`` M`P!``@``!`"?12`!(`%``@``#````#``,``#`$`"```$`)]%(`$@`4`"```, M````,``P``,`0`(```0`GT4@`2`!0`(```P````P`#```P!``@``!`"?12`! M(`%``@``#````#``,``#`$`"```$`)]%```````````,````,``P```````` M``0`GT4```````````P````P`#``````````!`"?12`!(`%``@``#````#`` M,``#`$`"```$`)]%(`$@`4`"```,````,``P``,`0`(```0`GT4````````` M``P````P`#```````````````(X!`````(X!`````+(``(```"P!(`ID"$`+ M__\8````__\`````0/^5`/__9````````````&0``````````0`!````,6,, M``$````0``$````!`````P`*``(``0``````&``!````'``!`````0```$#_ ME0#__V0``````````@!D````````````L@``@```+`$@"F0(0`O__Q@```#_ M_P````!`_Y4`__]D````````````9``````````!``$````Q;PP``0```!`` M`0````$````#``H``@`!```````8``$````<``$````!````0/^5`/__9``` M```````"`&0```````````"R``"````L`2`*9`A`"___&````/__`````$#_ ME0#__V0```````````!D``````````$``0```#%%#``!````$``!`````0`` M``,`"@`"``$``````!@``0```!P``0````$```!`_Y4`__]D``````````(` M9````````````#(``(````KZC?_V!7,)```,`````0``````0/^5`/__9``` M`````````&0`'@```````0``````#```````$```````&```````'``````` M"0````8````.``X``0#__PP``P`!`!4`````````!P````@````4!H<[```` M``4````*``````#O3@```````0``````````!`````(``P`P=0``$``'``P` M`````````0``!W#V\`8@^Q`(```!`0`!``(`````_?\``"P(ASL!```'P]4?^\`E'_@```0(``0`"````````````````0```![#U_O[P"?[^```! M`@`!``(```````````````!````'N/6K__@)J_\```$"``$``@`````````` M`````$````>U]6X`]0EN`````0(``0`"````````````````0```![WU)@'] M"28!```!`@`!``(```````````````!````'NO69`OH)F0(```$"``$``@`` M`````````````$````=I_$0#(/],`P```0(``0`"````````````````0``` M![WUY@']">8!```!`@`!``(````````````````.````W@``````#@`````` M<@``@```JO8M^58)P_O__PP```#__P````!`_Y4`__]D``````````$`9``` M```````!`"$```!$4ED@4E5.(%-#2$5$54Q%"RA!4R!/1CH@,B\R-R\Y-RD@ M#``A````$``$````$0````(`)``!``,```````H```````P````#```````" M`````@`,``$``P``````!```````#`````,``````!@`(0```!P``0```"$` M``!`_Y4`__]D``````````$`9``````````!`#(``(```!KVC?SF"7,&__\0 M````__\`````0/^5`/__9````````````&0`%````````0`+`P``1')Y(%)U M;@E$871E("AR968@3"U$87DI"4EN:F5C="`C,0D)26YJ96-T(",R"0E7:6YD M;W<-3#$@("`@("`@("`@("`@($PM-`D),#(O,C$S,%H)"3`S+S`Q,S!:(`D) M,#(O,C$P,"TP,R\P,S`P6@U,,2`@("`@("`@("`@("`@3"TS"0DP,R\R,3,P M6B`)"3`T+S`Q,S!:(`D),#,O,C$P,"TP-"\P,S`P6@U,,2`@("`@("`@("`@ M("`@3"TR("A"86-K=7`I"3`T+S(Q,S!:"0DP-2\P,3,P6@D),#0O,C$P,"TP M-2\P,S`P6@U,,B`@("`@("`@("`@("`@3"TT(`D),3'.P$`10L@`2`*<`A`"P```0$``0`"C`N' M._W_``#T"H<[`0!$"Y#W(`K@_D`+```!`0`!``(,"(<[_?\``&P+ASL!`$0# MD/?`].#^X/4```$!``$``C0(ASO]_P``Q`>'.P$`1`,@`<#T<`C@]0```0$` M`0`"E`>'._W_``!T!X<[`0!%"R`!(`IP"$`+```!`0`!``)4"X<[_?\``*0* MASL!`$0+D/<@"N#^0`L```$!``$``DP,ASO]_P``%`R'.P$`1`.0]\#TX/[@ M]0```0$``0`"E`R'._W_``!<#(<[`2!!H]#Y6QE```` M```-````0/^5`/__9````````P```&0`'@``````"P```$#_E0#__V0````` M``0```!D`!X``````",````@`````@`"``$`__\```,``0`5`````````"$` M```B````A`&'.QH````?````)```````ETX```]/`0`````````````````" M``(`_____P``!P`,```````````````````````.````*@```"<````````` M``#_____`P`$`!0`````````*````"D```"<`8<[)@`````````K```````` M```````"`````````!0```````(``@#_____```'``P````````````````` M``````X````Q````+@```````````/____\#````%``````````O````,``` M`+0!ASLM`````````#(```````````````,`````````%``!@#0+UTX``/]_ M```$```````T```````````````D`8<[`````"`!(`%``D`"8`-@`X`$@`0# M`$`"``#8````U`$@`=`"0`+P`V`#$`6`!`,`0`(```&`E!G73@(`_W\```0` M``````\`-@````0`-P``````````@`<````````````````````````````` M``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````@` M"``Y```````````````````````````````````````````````````````! M``$``0`!``$``0`!``$```#]_P```````&0`9`````````````$``0`!``$` M`````&0`9`!D``$``0"'.WA*@```````!P!8`/_______UD`````````!`!H MD6B1:)%9`````````$0`1V%;C_+],P```!2N```/`.S\!@'V*`4`V,[8SMC. M_?\```````!D`&0````````````!``$``0`!``````!D`&0`9``!``$`R`!F M38````````<`6`#_______]9``````````0`D9&1D9&160````````!$`&%A MCX_]_3,```"NK@``#P#\_`$!*"@%`,[.SL[.SOW_````````9`!D```````` M`````0`!``$``0``````9`!D`&0``0`!`%@`+DV````````'`%@`________ M60````````#__Y:6EI:6EED`````````__\``,S,F9G__S,S,S/,S/__S,S, MS/____^RLK*RLK+]_P```````&0`9`````````````$``0`!``$``````&0` M9`!D``$``0"J30!.@```````!P!8`/_______UD`````````!`"1D9&1D9%9 M`````````$0`86&/C_W],P```*ZN```/`/S\`0$H*`4`SL[.SL[.`8`L`==. M!0#_?P``!````````0`[`````P`\`````````````P`]`````0`^````1`&' M.U0!ASLT`8<[``!R`!^````L`````P`````````L`````P`````````L```` M`P`````````L`````P`````````L`````P``````0/^5`/__9``````````! M`&0```````````````#_E0#__V0```````$``0!D````````````````_Y4` M__]D```````"``$`9````````````````/^5`/__9````````P`!`&0````` M``````````#_E0#__V0```````0``0!D```````````````!`#(`'X```"`` M```!`````````!P````!`````````!@````!`````````!0````!```````` M`!0````!``````!!_Y4`__]D````````````9``4````````````0?^6`/__ M9````````0```&0`%````````````$'_E0#__V0```````(```!D`!0````` M``````!!_Y8`__]D```````#````9``4````````````0?^5`/__9``````` M!````&0`%```````````````,@`?@```#`````$`````````#`````$````` M````#`````$`````````#`````$`````````#`````$``````$#_E0#__V0` M``````````!D`!X```````````!`_Y4`__]D```````!````9``>```````` M````0/^5`/__9````````@```&0`'@```````````$#_E0#__V0```````,` M``!D`!X```````````!`_Y4`__]D```````$````9``>````````````__\R M`!^``0`>`````0```````0`>`````0```````0`>`````0```````0`>```` M`0```````0`>`````0``````%0&5````9````````````&0`%`#^_P`````` M`!4!E0```&0```````$```!D`!0`_O\````````5`94```!D```````"```` M9``4`/[_````````%0&5````9````````P```&0`%`#^_P```````!4!E0`` M`&0```````0```!D`!0`_O\``````````#,`'X```!@````!`````````!@` M```!`````````!@````!`````````!@````!`````````!@````!``````!` M_Y4`__]D````````````9````````````````/^5`/__9````````0```&0` M``````````````#_E0#__V0```````(```!D````````````````_Y4`__]D M```````#````9````````````````/^5`/__9```````!````&0````````` M``````$``0```````````00``0`"``0`,``P```````!```````!@.8&UTX$ M`/]_``!````````V````````````D`$`````````$E1I;65S($YE=R!2;VUA M;@```)]%````````8$8O1`\/``````$`%``*```(```%````````````D`$` M````````(D%R:6%L`$)&9[@/#^=0-`$!`%A&;_`/#P``8$8O1`\/```````` M!`"X1K=.```)````````````O`(`````````$E1I;65S($YE=R!2;VUA;@`* M```(```/#P``5`&'.Y!'``````$`%0`+```(```&````````````D`'_```` M````$E1I;65S($YE=R!2;VUA;@`*```(```/#P``5`&'.XY&````````MTX! M`%0!``#T_P$`!``````````L`2P!`````&`)Z@L!`+7_@_^K"6<,`0!(4"!$ M97-K2F5T(#,T,"!0 MK0O0SQ'@H;$:X0`````````````````````^``,`_O\)``8````````````` M``$````!```````````0``#^____`````/[___\``````````/__________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M____________________________________________________________ M_______^_P``!``"```````````````````````!````X(6?\OE/:!"KD0@` M*R>SV3````!T)P``#@````$```!X`````@```(`````#````K`````0```"X M````!0```-`````&````W`````<```#H````"````/0````2````#`$```L` M```L`0``#````#@!```-````1`$```X```!0`0``$0```%@!```"````Y`0` M`!X````B````34E34TE/3B!30TA%1%5,12`H05,@3T8Z(#(O,3`O.30`R`$<`1P`R`&0`7``@`$<`70!C M`%8`7`!=`%4`50`$`````@$"`!4```#[`L__````````D`$`````````$E1I M;65S($YE=R!2;VUA;@`5``0````M`0,`!````/`!`@`$````+@$8``4````* M`@`````%````"0(````"!0```!0"\,7__P0````"`0$`%@```#(*U_Q7_PH` M```H05,@3T8Z(#(O$``C`!L`#``B`!L`#0`,`!@`#@`$`````@$"`!4```#[ M`L__````````O`(`````````$E1I;65S($YE=R!2;VUA;@`P``0````M`0(` M!````/`!`P`%````"0(````"!0```!0"\,7__P0````"`0$`"@```#(*U_PM M``(````R-Q@`&``$`````@$"`!4```#[`L__````````D`$`````````$E1I M;65S($YE=R!2;VUA;@`5``0````M`0,`!````/`!`@`%````"0(````"!0`` M`!0"\,7__P0````"`0$`#0```#(*U_Q=``0````O.3````,@H\_?G\#P```$1A=&4@5VEN9&]W M("A:*0`N`!T`$@`<`!``/``2`"``(``@`"X`$``6`"<`%0`$`````@$"``4` M```)`@````(%````%`+PQ?__!`````(!`0`?````,@H\_3G_$````$YO;6EN M86P@1&%T92`H6BDN`"``,@`2`"``'``2`!``+@`=`!(`'``0`!4`)P`6``0` M```"`0(`!0````D"`````@4````4`O#%__\$`````@$!`!@````R"CS]>0$+ M````5&EM92!7:6YD;W<`)P`2`#(`'``0`#T`$@`@`"``(``N``0````"`0(` M!0````D"`````@4````4`O#%__\$`````@$!`!D````R"CS]N0,,````3F]M M:6YA;"!4:6UE+@`@`#(`$@`@`!P`$@`0`"<`$@`R`!P`!`````(!`@`5```` M^P+`_P```````)`!`````````!)4:6UE0$+````,C$P,"TP-C`P6B``(``@`"``(``6`"``(``@`"`` M)P`0``0````"`0(`!0````D"`````@4````4`O#%__\$`````@$!``\````R M"IG]N0,%````,#$S,%H`(``@`"``(``G``0````"`0(`%0```/L"P/\````` M``"0`0`````````25&EM97,@3F5W(%)O;6%N`#``!````"T!`@`$````\`$# M``0````N`1@`!0````H"``````4````)`@````(%````%`+PQ?__!`````(! M`0`?````,@KU_;GZ$````$PR("`@("`@("`@("`@("`G`"``$``0`!``$``0 M`!``$``0`!``$``0`!``$``0``0````"`0(`!0````D"`````@4````4`O#% M__\$`````@$!`!4````R"O7]^?P)````,B\R,2TR+S(U`"``$@`@`"``%0`@ M`!(`(``@``0````"`0(`!0````D"`````@4````4`O#%__\$`````@$!``T` M```R"O7].?\$````,B\R,2``$@`@`"``!`````(!`@`%````"0(````"!0`` M`!0"\,7__P0````"`0$`%@```#(*]?UY`0H````Q,S`P+3(R,#!:(``@`"`` M(``6`"``(``@`"``)P`$`````@$"``4````)`@````(%````%`+PQ?__!``` M``(!`0`/````,@KU_;D#!0```#$X,3%:`"``(``@`"``)P`$`````@$"`!4` M``#[`L#_````````D`$`````````$E1I;65S($YE=R!2;VUA;@`5``0````M M`0,`!````/`!`@`$````+@$8``4````*`@`````%````"0(````"!0```!0" M\,7__P0````"`0$`"@```#(*4OZY^@(```!,,R<`(``$`````@$"``4````) M`@````(%````%`+PQ?__!`````(!`0`3````,@I2_OG\"````#(O,C0$+````,3,P,"TR,C`P6B``(``@ M`"``(``6`"``(``@`"``)P`0``0````"`0(`%0```/L"P/\```````"\`@`` M```````25&EM97,@3F5W(%)O;6%N`!4`!````"T!`P`$````\`$"``4````) M`@````(%````%`+PQ?__!`````(!`0`3````,@JN_KD#"````#$X-3DZ,S!: M(``@`"``(``6`"``(``J``0````"`0(`%0```/L"P/\```````"0`0`````` M```25&EM97,@3F5W(%)O;6%N`#``!````"T!`@`$````\`$#`!4```#[`L#_ M````````D`$`````````$E1I;65S($YE=R!2;VUA;@`5``0````M`0,`!``` M`/`!`@`$````+@$8``4````*`@`````%````"0(````"!0```!0"\,7__P0` M```"`0$`'P```#(*"_^Y^A````!,-"`@("`@("`@("`@("`@)P`@`!``$``0 M`!``$``0`!``$``0`!``$``0`!``$``$`````@$"``4````)`@````(%```` M%`+PQ?__!`````(!`0`?````,@H+__G\$````#,O,38M,R\R,B`@("`@("`@ M`!(`(``@`!4`(``2`"``(``0`!``$``0`!``$``0``0````"`0(`!0````D" M`````@4````4`O#%__\$`````@$!`"4````R"@O_.?\4````,R\Q-BTS+S$W M("`@("`@("`@("`@`!(`(``@`!4`(``2`"``(``0`!``$``0`!``$``0`!`` M$``0`!``!`````(!`@`%````"0(````"!0```!0"\,7__P0````"`0$`&0`` M`#(*"_]Y`0P````R,3`P+2`P-C`P6B`@`"``(``@`!8`$``@`"``(``@`"<` M$``$`````@$"`!4```#[`L#_````````O`(`````````$E1I;65S($YE=R!2 M;VUA;@`P``0````M`0(`!````/`!`P`%````"0(````"!0```!0"\,7__P0` M```"`0$`$P```#(*"_^Y`P@````P,S4R.C,P6B``(``@`"``%@`@`"``*@`$ M`````@$"`!4```#[`L#_````````D`$`````````$E1I;65S($YE=R!2;VUA M;@`5``0````M`0,`!````/`!`@`5````^P+`_P```````)`!`````````!)4 M:6UE0$=````26YJ96-T M(",R('=I;&P@8F4@4D5!3"!O;B`R+S<`%@`@`!$`'0`<`!(`$``@`"``$``N M`!(`$@`2`!``(``<`!``*P`G`"X`)P`0`"``(``0`"``$@`@``0````"`0(` M%0```/L"P/\```````"0`0`````````25&EM97,@3F5W(%)O;6%N`#``!``` M`"T!`@`$````\`$#``0````N`1@`!0````H"``````4````)`@````(%```` M%`+PQ?__!`````(!`0`3````,@K:`+GZ"````$PR("`@("`@)P`@`!``$``0 M`!``$``0``0````"`0(`!0````D"`````@4````4`O#%__\$`````@$!`$`` M```R"MH`V?LF````26YJ96-T(",Q(&]N('1H92!C;&]C:R!A="`R,2\Q-#$Q M6B`@("`6`"``$0`=`!P`$@`0`"``(``0`"``(``0`!(`(``<`!``'0`1`"`` M'0`@`!``'``2`!``(``@`!(`(``@`"``(``G`!``$``0`!``!`````(!`@`% M````"0(````"!0```!0"\,7__P0````"`0$`-````#(*V@!Y`1X```!);FIE M8W0@(S(@=VEL;"!B92!214%,(&]N(#(O,C$6`"``$0`=`!P`$@`0`"``(``0 M`"X`$@`2`!(`$``@`!P`$``K`"<`+@`G`!``(``@`!``(``2`"``(``$```` M`@$"`!4```#[`L#_````````D`$`````````$E1I;65S($YE=R!2;VUA;@`5 M``0````M`0,`!````/`!`@`$````+@$8``4````*`@`````%````"0(````" M!0```!0"\,7__P0````"`0$`$@```#(*-@&Y^@<```!,,R`@("`@`"<`(``0 M`!``$``0`!``!`````(!`@`%````"0(````"!0```!0"\,7__P0````"`0$` M/````#(*-@'9^R,```!);FIE8W0@(S$@;VX@=&AE(&-L;V-K(&%T(#(X+S$T M-35:(``6`"``$0`=`!P`$@`0`"``(``0`"``(``0`!(`(``<`!``'0`1`"`` M'0`@`!``'``2`!``(``@`!(`(``@`"``(``G`!``!`````(!`@`%````"0(` M```"!0```!0"\,7__P0````"`0$`-````#(*-@%Y`1X```!);FIE8W0@(S(@ M=VEL;"!B92!214%,(&]N(#(O,C@6`"``$0`=`!P`$@`0`"``(``0`"X`$@`2 M`!(`$``@`!P`$``K`"<`+@`G`!``(``@`!``(``2`"``(``$`````@$"`!4` M``#[`L#_````````D`$`````````$E1I;65S($YE=R!2;VUA;@`P``0````M M`0(`!````/`!`P`$````+@$8``4````*`@`````%````"0(````"!0```!0" M\,7__P0````"`0$`#P```#(*DP&Y^@4```!,,R!"50`G`"``$``K`"X`!``` M``(!`@`%````"0(````"!0```!0"\,7__P0````"`0$`/````#(*DP'9^R,` M``!);FIE8W0@(S$@;VX@=&AE(&-L;V-K(&%T(#`Q+S$T-3E:(``6`"``$0`= M`!P`$@`0`"``(``0`"``(``0`!(`(``<`!``'0`1`"``'0`@`!``'``2`!`` M(``@`!(`(``@`"``(``G`!``!`````(!`@`%````"0(````"!0```!0"\,7_ M_P0````"`0$`,P```#(*DP%Y`1T```!);FIE8W0@(S(@=VEL;"!B92!214%, M(&]N(#,O,0`6`"``$0`=`!P`$@`0`"``(``0`"X`$@`2`!(`$``@`!P`$``K M`"<`+@`G`!``(``@`!``(``2`"``!`````(!`@`5````^P+`_P```````)`! M`````````!)4:6UE@$>````26YJ96-T(",R('=I;&P@8F4@4D5!3"!O;B`S+S$W%@`@`!$`'0`< M`!(`$``@`"``$``N`!(`$@`2`!``(``<`!``*P`G`"X`)P`0`"``(``0`"`` M$@`@`"``!`````(!`@`5````^P+`_P```````)`!`````````!)4:6UE`!T`#``,`",`#``B`",` M'0`C``P`+0`0`!T`'@`,`"``'0`;`"(`'@`=``P`$``C``P`(@`,`!X`(@`C M`",`(``B``P`(P`;`!T`'0`@``P`'@`B`!X`#``B`",`*P`0`"(`(P`=``P` M'@`0`"H`'@`,`!H`'@`B`",`(P`=`",`#``B`"``(P`C`!T`#``,`",`#``@ M`!T`(P`=``0````"`0(`%0```/L"S_\```````"0`0`````````25&EM97,@ M3F5W(%)O;6%N`#``!````"T!`@`$````\`$#``0````N`1@`!0````H"```` M``4````)`@````(%````%`+PQ?__!`````(!`0"'````,@K/`B7[50```%1) M344@0T%,3"!#04X@0D4@34%$12!&3U(@04X@041$251)3TY!3"!)3DI%0U1) M3TX@4%))3U(@5$\@5$A%($%#5%5!3"!,055.0T@@5$\@0TA%0TL`'@`0`"H` M'@`,`"``(@`>`!T`#``@`",`(@`,`"``'@`,`"H`(P`C`!T`#``;`"(`(``, M`",`(P`,`"(`(P`C`!``'0`0`",`(@`C`!T`#``0`",`$P`=`"``'0`0`",` M(@`,`!L`(``0`",`(``,`!T`(P`,`!T`(P`=``P`(P`@`!T`(P`B`!X`#``= M`",`(@`C`"``(P`,`!T`(P`,`"``(@`>`"``(@`$`````@$"`!4```#[`L__ M````````D`$`````````$E1I;65S($YE=R!2;VUA;@`5``0````M`0,`!``` M`/`!`@`$````+@$8``4````*`@`````%````"0(````"!0```!0"\,7__P0` M```"`0$`E@```#(*"`,E^U\```!#25)#54E44RX@(%1(12!)3DE424%,($E. M2D5#5"!724Q,($)%($].(%1(12!#3$]#2RP@3D]4(%1(12!#3U5.5"X@(%12 M3U5"3$4M4TA/3U1)3D<@24Y*14-424].4P`@`!``(``@`",`$``=`!L`#``, M``P`'0`C`!T`#``0`",`$``=`!``(P`=``P`$``C`!,`'0`@`!T`#``M`!`` M'@`=``P`(``=``P`(P`C``P`'0`C`!T`#``@`!T`(P`@`",`#``,`"(`(P`= M``P`'@`B`!X`#``@`"(`(P`C`!T`#``,``P`'0`@`",`(P`@`!T`'0`0`!L` M(P`B`",`'0`0`",`(P`,`!``(@`3`!T`(``>`!``(@`C`!L`!`````(!`@`5 M````^P+/_P```````)`!`````````!)4:6UE````0T%.($)%($U!1$4@248@5$A% M62!/0T-54B!!5"!,14%35"!/3D4@2$]54B!04DE/4B!43R!42$4@(E-,25!0 M140B($Q!54Y#2"!!5"!42$4@1$E30U)%5$E/3B!/1B``(P`C``P`(``=``P` M*P`B`",`'0`,`!``&P`,`!T`(P`=`",`#``C`"``(``B`"``#``C`!T`#``> M`!T`(P`:`!X`#``B`",`'0`,`",`(P`B`"``#``;`"``$``C`"``#``=`",` M#``=`",`'0`,`!0`&@`>`!``&@`;`!T`(P`3``P`'@`B`",`(P`@`"(`#``C M`!T`#``>`"(`'@`,`"(`$``;`"``(``=`!X`$``B`",`#``C`!H`!`````(! M`@`5````^P+/_P```````)`!`````````!)4:6UE`"(`'@`,`!T`'0`;``P`(``C`"(`(``C`!``(P`B`!X`(@`@ M``P`+@`0`!T`(P`,`!T`(@`>``P`(``B`",`(``C`"``(``=`",`(``=``P` M(P`;``P`'0`C`!T`#``;`!``'0`,`!T`'0`;`!X`#``@`"(`(P`C`"(`(``> M`"(`(``,``0````"`0(`!0````D"`````@0````M`0``!P```/P"`0`````` M```$````+0$"`!````#[`A``!P``````O`(``````0("(E-Y``<````6!`9`+@4!P*CZ"0```/H"!@`(```` M`````B(`!````"T!`P`%````%`)__:CZ!0```!,"A/TF!00````M`0``!``` M`"T!`@`$````\`$#``0````G`?__!````"T!```$````+0$"``,````>``<` M```6!`9`&`4!P*CZ"0```/H"!@`(`````````B(`!````"T!`P`%````%`)H M`*CZ!0```!,"8``0!00````M`0``!````"T!`@`$````\`$#``0````G`?__ M!````"T!```$````+0$"``,````>``<````6!`9`,`4!P*OZ"0```/H"!@`( M`````````B(`!````"T!`P`%````%`+?_:OZ!0```!,"V/TH!00````M`0`` M!````"T!`@`$````\`$#``0````G`?__!````"T!```$````+0$"``,````> M``<````6!`9`&`4!P*SZ"0```/H"!@`(`````````B(`!````"T!`P`%```` M%`+$`*SZ!0```!,"P``0!00````M`0``!````"T!`@`$````\`$#``0````G M`?__#P```"8&#P`4`%1.4%`$``P`````````````````"0```"8&#P`(`/__ M__\!````!````"T!```$````+0$"``,``````-#/$>"AL1KA```````````` M`````````#X``P#^_PD`!@```````````````0````$``````````!```/[_ >__\`````_O___P``````````________________ ` end From "d hauptly"@pottsville.infi.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:05 1997 Return-Path: "d hauptly"@pottsville.infi.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00425 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:05 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA01890; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:16:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhost.infi.net(208.131.167.6) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001885; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:16:06 -0500 Received: from queffer by mh004.infi.net with SMTP (Infinet-S-8.8.5) id JAA08479; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:16:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3316E693.5D58@pottsville.infi.net> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:07:15 -0500 From: denise hauptly <"d hauptly"@pottsville.infi.net> Organization: InfiNet X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Stop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 621 I just read an article in our local paper about the phone companies trying to get it approved that they could charge us for the time we spend on the internet, I wanted to say that this should be stopped, how could people afford this, we are already paying for the phone line, some of us even have two lines, one just for the computer....I am tired of these companies always trying to double dip. We are also paying a charge to an internet provider, which is fair, but these phone companies should be stopped......NOW. Thank You, Denise Hauptly 60 York Farm Road Pottsville, Pa. 17901 dhauptly@pottsville.infi.net From billsf@earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:06 1997 Return-Path: billsf@earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00428 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:05 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA01828; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:12:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from armenia-c.it.earthlink.net(204.250.46.106) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001824; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:12:41 -0500 Received: from my-system (Cust28.Max11.Los-Angeles.CA.MS.UU.NET [153.34.75.156]) by armenia.it.earthlink.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA29886 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:12:15 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970228061142.006a946c@earthlink.net> X-Sender: billsf@earthlink.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:11:45 -0800 To: isp@fcc.gov From: Bill Bailey Subject: Phone Company Tarrifs on Internet Access Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Length: 261 This concept has angered me since it's inception. Mark me down as one small citizen who is vehemently opposed to any sort of "Internet Phone Tax." Surely, this will choke the growth of this wonderful, burgeoning industry. Sincerely, William M. Bailey III From Kirker01@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:06 1997 Return-Path: Kirker01@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00431 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:06 -0500 From: Kirker01@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA01688; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:05:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout16.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001684; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:05:35 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id JAA01657 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:05:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:05:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228090512_1679788388@emout16.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: DON'T DO IT!!!! Content-Length: 369 Do not tax Internet usage on the PUBLIC phone lines. If this happens I will go to cellular modem and use my cellular phone to access the internet ( I have a plan that gives me unlimetd air time at particular hours). With all of my taxes combined the goverment already gets %50 of my taxes. TELL ME WHY I KEEP WORKING IF IT GETS ANY HIGHER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! From shappell@pottsville.infi.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:06 1997 Return-Path: shappell@pottsville.infi.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00434 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:06 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id JAA01623; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:01:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhost.infi.net(208.131.167.6) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001620; Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:01:10 -0500 Received: from hp-customer by mh004.infi.net with SMTP (Infinet-S-8.8.5) id JAA22429; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:02:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3316E477.2315@pottsville.infi.net> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:58:39 -0500 From: barbara shappell Reply-To: shappell@pottsville.infi.net Organization: InfiNet X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: possible internet charges Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 530 To whom it may concern, It has come to my attention that the phone companies are proposing that charges be assessed by the minute for internet use. I urge you not to permit this to happen. Many people would not be able to afford this extra expense. By allowing this to be, many children would be denied access to the internet. If President Clinton wishes for a computer in every home then this must be stopped now before it goes any further! Thank You, Barbara Shappell From PaganIndi@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:06 1997 Return-Path: PaganIndi@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00437 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:06 -0500 From: PaganIndi@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id IAA01479; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:54:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout08.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.23) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001475; Fri, 28 Feb 97 08:54:16 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout08.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id IAA16082 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:53:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:53:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228085352_-1038328158@emout08.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Increased On-Line Phone Bills Content-Length: 246 To Whom It May Concern, I wish to express my displeasure as an on-line user at the proposed increase in on-line phone costs. Is the FCC simply in collusion with Big Business, or does it have authority to legislate independently? Julian Indica From InkardJB@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:07 1997 Return-Path: InkardJB@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00440 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:07 -0500 From: InkardJB@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id IAA01458; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:52:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout07.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.22) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001450; Fri, 28 Feb 97 08:52:43 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout07.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id IAA05110 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:52:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:52:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228085215_951660734@emout07.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Content-Length: 1001 I strongly oppose granting the local telephone company the right to impose per-minute charges for Internet access. I strongly doubt that network performance has been degraded by such activity and believe that the request is merely based on the desire for revenue enhancement. I have not noted any increase in call blocking over the past few years. Had such blocking occurred, I would have believed that there was network degradation. Such timed charges for line use by non-commercial subscribers would appear to discriminate against those who use the telephone network for non-voice purposes. The ISP's appear to be paying their way and the telephone company is merely out to gouge the customer. They might do better to improve the quality of ISDN service so that it becomes economically viable outside the few areas where it is fine-tuned by design engineers acting as technicians. Arthur W. Downs 619 Hollywood Road Severna Park, MD 21146 (410) 315-9241 (Voice) (410) 315-9248 (Data/FAX) From Shon@stanly.org Fri Feb 28 11:44:07 1997 Return-Path: Shon@stanly.org Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00443 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:07 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id IAA01364; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:45:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(204.116.113.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001362; Fri, 28 Feb 97 08:44:51 -0500 Received: from STANLY1-Message_Server by stanly.org with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:44:10 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:41:43 -0500 From: Shon Barrier To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Proposed rate hikes Content-Length: 457 ** High Priority ** Please do not allow the telcos to run roughshod over consumers. Do not allow them to raise the rates, and thus cause higher priced Internet access. Instead encourage them to build better and more efficient digital networks, which would allow faster Internet access.This would also have the dual effect of freeing up the analog network for what it was built to do, that is carry voice traffic. Sincerely, Shon Barrier shon@stanly.org From jleonard@toad.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:08 1997 Return-Path: jleonard@toad.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00446 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:07 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id IAA01335; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:43:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from beast.toad.net(205.197.182.100) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001332; Fri, 28 Feb 97 08:43:38 -0500 Received: from johnleon (maxd14.toad.net [205.197.182.54]) by beast.toad.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA26465 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:43:15 -0500 Message-Id: <199702281343.IAA26465@beast.toad.net> From: "John Irwin Leonard" To: Subject: Telephone Charges Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:42:53 -0500 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 626 FCC: Is it true that telephone companies are attempting to add per-minute or other additional charges to my phone line usage bill? I have heard that this is true for lines used to make calls to internet service providers. As a consumer whose telephone charges are already inflated with taxes and high monthly rates, I would be against any extra charges on my phone line. It would be unfair to impose additional charges simply because I am using the connection for computer communication instead of a voice conversation. Your response on this question and to this matter will be appreciated. Sincerely, --- John Leonard From bhuffman@sarcom.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:11 1997 Return-Path: bhuffman@sarcom.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00449 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:08 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id IAA01070; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:25:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns1.sarcom.com(206.158.16.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma001057; Fri, 28 Feb 97 08:25:43 -0500 Received: from sarcom21.sarcom.com (col21.sarcom.com [206.158.17.21]) by ns1.sarcom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA27293 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:25:20 -0500 Received: by sarcom21.sarcom.com; Fri, 28 Feb 97 8:25:36 EST Date: Fri, 28 Feb 97 8:24:16 EST Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) To: From: "Brian Huffman" Subject: Phone line usage charges for the internet X-Incognito-SN: 2002 X-Incognito-Format: VERSION=2.01a ENCRYPTED=NO Content-Length: 2687 Dear Sirs/Madams: I understand that the local phone companies in the Cincinnati and other areas have jointly filed a petition to charge all customers for phone line usage for using the internet. I think the whole idea is ridiculous and we will, if necessary, form a customer coalition and oppose this vehemently (in court if we have to). The phone companies have failed to keep up with the times and the internet technology for long-distance communication now threatens their business. This is a pathetic attempt on their part to milk the customer. WE WILL NOT STAND FOR IT!!!!!!! Brian Christopher Huffman Computer/Applications Engineer Sarcom, Business Process Engineering Email: bhuffman@sarcom.com Brian.Christopher.Huffman@worldnet.att.net The following was included as an attachement. Please use UUDECODE to retrieve it. The original file name was 'ATTRIBS.BND'. begin 666 ATTRIBS.BND M0F5Y;VYD(%!A8VME9"!!='1R:6)U=&5S```+0514*```````4&AO;F4@;&EN M92!U2!F:6QE9"!A('!E=&ET:6]N('1O(&-H87)G92!A;&P@8W5S=&]M97)S(&9O M2P@9F]R;2!A(&-U2`H:6X@8V]UP$`9`&`30(`=@)`7P+ 8`2`-`<0.`6@0`0P2`;`3`505`?@6;@`` ` end From kentley@infowest.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:11 1997 Return-Path: kentley@infowest.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00452 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:11 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id IAA00756; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:08:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from infowest.com(204.17.177.10) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma000753; Fri, 28 Feb 97 08:08:36 -0500 Received: from Gallifrey.infowest.com (Gallifrey.infowest.com [204.17.177.103]) by infowest.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA27718 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:08:46 -0701 (MST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:08:46 -0701 (MST) Message-Id: <199702281309.GAA27718@infowest.com> X-Sender: kentley@infowest.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.3b4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@fcc.gov From: kentley@infowest.com (Kent) Subject: Possible Charges for per minute use of phone lines for internet service. Content-Length: 453 I was made aware of the following news: In related news, the FCC is currently reviewing a proposal to allow USWest and other telephone carriers to impose a per-minute charge for using phone lines for Internet service. Leave it up to the government and its special interest groups to think a new charge to hit customers with. Instead of looking at new ways to generate income the government should be trying to manage the funds they currently collect. From anysia@gte.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:12 1997 Return-Path: anysia@gte.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00455 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:12 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id IAA00769; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:09:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail1.gte.net(206.124.65.236) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma000764; Fri, 28 Feb 97 08:09:01 -0500 Received: from mail.gte.net (sm1.gte.net [207.115.153.18]) by smtp.gte.net (SMI-8.6/) via SMTP id HAA19246 for <@mail1.gte.net:isp@fcc.gov>; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:08:35 -0600 Received: from LOCALNAME (sst254016.gte.net [207.115.254.16]) by mail.gte.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AutoCF) via SMTP id HAA05955 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:08:13 -0600 Message-ID: <331701DB.19DF@gte.net> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:03:39 -0800 From: anysia Reply-To: anysia@gte.net Organization: House of Mayhem X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Raising rates for modem connect!? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1007 Once again the telephone companies are trying to get more money by intitiating a tarriff(for want of a better word) for modem calls. Oh please! My calling out by modem is not costing any more than if I picked up my phone and calling a friend and gabbing for a while. The phone companies are trying to say the need more money? Not from what I have seen. According to stock reports, and quarterly reports, they are doing just fine without hammering modem using customers with an additional charge. Since I use a phone company based ISP, I feel this is doubly unfair for company to try to squeeze even more money out of me. I don't run a business with my modem, I use it for email, some info searches on the internet, and sometimes chat with people in a forum. I pay my monthly fee, and that should be the end of it! How dare phone companies start offering internet access and then want to nail the subscribers with another possible fee for using the service the company themselves provided? Enough! From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:12 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00458 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:12 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id HAA00604; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:58:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma000598; Fri, 28 Feb 97 07:58:18 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id EAA04459 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:57:55 -0800 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:57:55 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702281257.EAA04459@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: jloden@earthlink.net Subject: Form Data from 206.85.117.81 Content-Length: 685 Date: Fri Feb 28 04:57:55 PST 1997 address = 25637 estoril st city = valencia comments = there's 2 ways to increase net revenue. increase taxes or lower expenses. I suggest you seriously consider the latter. email = jloden@earthlink.net name = jay l,oden regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = ca statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 91355 From severini@mbox.vol.it Fri Feb 28 11:44:12 1997 Return-Path: severini@mbox.vol.it Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00461 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:12 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id HAA00350; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:38:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from k100.mbox.vol.it(194.20.32.70) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma000348; Fri, 28 Feb 97 07:38:19 -0500 Received: from severini.vol.it (ip144.tin14.interbusiness.it) by mbox.vol.it with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA175243476; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 13:37:56 +0100 Message-Id: <3316D2B1.171F@mbox.vol.it> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 13:42:25 +0100 From: Piero Severini Reply-To: severini@mbox.vol.it Organization: vol.it X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: PLEASE, DO NOT ALLOW PHONE COMPANIES TO CHARGE INTERNET USERS BY THE MINUTE!!! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 248 It's absurd to start charging by the minute. Telephone companies are not even gonna benefit from this violence done to people that work besides other thing on the 'net, simply because 99% of the US is gonna stop using the internet. Piero Severini From Hotwomn@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:13 1997 Return-Path: Hotwomn@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00464 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:12 -0500 From: Hotwomn@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id HAA00210; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:17:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout18.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.44) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma000207; Fri, 28 Feb 97 07:17:00 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout18.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id HAA13458 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:16:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:16:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228071636_-2042345454@emout18.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: fw: sneaky telco money grab Content-Length: 603 To Whom It May Concern: I am simply appalled that the FCC would even think of allowing the local telephone companies to charge for per minute usage. We pay enough to the damned phone company as it is, and we also pay enough to our internet service suppliers. If this happens, myself along with many other acquaintences of mine from the internet will no longer be using the net as a service to our pc needs. Whatever happened to the freedom in this country??????????? Sincerely, Connie Gillespie #8 Willow Wood Ct. Caseyville, IL 62232 (618) 931-1644 FAX (618) 931-1645 e-mail Hotwomn@aol.com From taz@atw.fullfeed.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:13 1997 Return-Path: taz@mail.atw.fullfeed.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00467 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:13 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id HAA00212; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:17:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from peter.atw.fullfeed.com(199.201.68.100) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma000205; Fri, 28 Feb 97 07:16:57 -0500 Received: from pm-ok-0-2.athenet.net (pm-ok-0-2.athenet.net [204.248.246.42]) by peter.atw.fullfeed.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id GAA28694 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:16:31 -0600 (CST) X-Origin: Received: by pm-ok-0-2.athenet.net with Microsoft Mail id <01BC253E.F3E36F60@pm-ok-0-2.athenet.net>; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:16:36 -0600 Message-ID: <01BC253E.F3E36F60@pm-ok-0-2.athenet.net> From: David Henderson To: "'isp@fcc.gov'" Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:16:25 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1801 I am writing in response to the proposal made by telephone providers to the FCC. I do not think it is the best interest of the general public, nor is it in the best interest of the economy of the United States. The proposed "per-minute" charge scheme would be highly damaging to the fledgling economy developing across the computer networks in this country. It would also be harmful to researchers, students, and government agengies across the country and world-wide. If per-minute charges are allowed to take effect, the effect would be a reduction of consumer interest, and a stagnation of academic progress and communications. I urge you to deny the proposal as it would deny many people the right to fast communications, as they would no longer be able to afford the charges. Many non-profit organizations and research groups would have a much more restricted access to this indispensable mode of communication. I urge you to do what is right for the general public of the United States, and for its many invaluable organizations. Please do not grant telephone providers' proposal as it is a monopolistic measure and would contribute to the rapid decline of services involved with the internet. You should consider how much economic damage this proposal will do to local access providers, major access providers (e.g. AOL), and universities as these groups attempt to develop and improve the communications and services provided on the internet. They would be hard pressed to deal with this new burden. Thank you for your time and consideration, Sincerely, (David J. Henderson) ````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Beta Sigma Phi Mailing List (beta-sigma-phi@bcpub.com) Unsubscribe messages (majordomo@bcpub.com) Help (owner-beta-sigma-phi@bcpub.com) From Ceej29@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:13 1997 Return-Path: Ceej29@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00470 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:13 -0500 From: Ceej29@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id HAA00158; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:10:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout18.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.44) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma000156; Fri, 28 Feb 97 07:10:04 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout18.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id HAA10757 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:09:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:09:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228070940_-1607690281@emout18.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: FW: Sneaky Telco Money Grab Content-Length: 320 To Whom it may concern: I think that it is terrible that you would even ponder the thoughts of allowing us to be charged more money than we already are on the internet. I know that if this happens I will no longer use the service. Sincerely, C. Woods 1629 Ferguson Avenue Granite City, IL 62040 e-mail ceej@aol.com From MAJEWGL@ccmail.ceco.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:14 1997 Return-Path: MAJEWGL@ccmail.ceco.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00473 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:13 -0500 From: MAJEWGL@ccmail.ceco.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id HAA00128; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:06:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from firewall.ceco.com(198.29.253.130) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma000126; Fri, 28 Feb 97 07:05:40 -0500 Received: from ceco.ceco.com ([130.197.8.140]) by firewall.ceco.com (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA11472 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 05:02:30 -0600 Received: from ccmail.ceco.com (gol-bootp-209-158.ceco.com [130.197.209.158]) by ceco.ceco.com (8.7.5/8.6.4) with SMTP id GAA22432 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:05:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from ccMail by ccmail.ceco.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) id AA857131650; Thu, 27 Feb 97 09:56:46 CST Date: Thu, 27 Feb 97 09:56:46 CST Message-Id: <9701288571.AA857131650@ccmail.ceco.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Phone company charges for Internet access Content-Length: 585 Dear Sir/Madam: As a lowly Internet user, I would like to express my objection to the proposed phone company "surcharges" for Internet access that I've recently read about. Most Internet users already pay hefty premiums through their Internet access providers, on top of phone bills reflecting modem access. How many times and how many different people are we going to have to pay in the future? Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Grace Majewski majewgl@ccmail.ceco.com From geiger@ods.co.jp Fri Feb 28 11:44:14 1997 Return-Path: geiger@ods.co.jp Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00476 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:14 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id HAA29987; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 07:00:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(202.238.103.162) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029985; Fri, 28 Feb 97 07:00:01 -0500 Received: from 192.168.1.107 ([192.168.1.107]) by ns.ods.co.jp (8.8.0/3.5Wbeta) with SMTP id VAA02499 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 21:23:12 +0900 Message-ID: <33174780.1FA7@ods.co.jp> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 21:00:48 +0000 From: "J.D. Geiger" X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Per Minute Internet Charges Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 568 Why should telephone companies be permitted to charge per minute for Internet use when they offer me a plan for unlimited usage? When I don't use the phone much, they profit mightily. Allowing local phone companies to charge per minute will make the U.S. telecommunications market slow and expensive like Japan's, where charges are per minute and Internet-based networks are not economically compelling. Keep the U.S. the leader in network computing. Don't allow U.S. phone companies to renege on their agreement of unolimited phone time for a set monthly charge. From Tony39@concentric.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:30 1997 Return-Path: Tony39@concentric.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00479 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:14 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id GAA29968; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:55:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from darius.concentric.net(207.155.184.79) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029966; Fri, 28 Feb 97 06:55:34 -0500 Received: from cliff.cris.com (cliff.cris.com [199.3.12.45]) by darius.concentric.net (8.8.5/(97/02/12 3.22)) id GAA06903; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:55:11 -0500 (EST) [1-800-745-2747 The Concentric Network] Errors-To: Received: from anthony (61014d0007la.concentric.net [206.173.240.91]) by cliff.cris.com (8.8.5) id GAA26559; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:55:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <331656C3.2DB3@concentric.net> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:53:40 +0000 From: Tony39 Reply-To: Tony39@concentric.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Unlimited time or? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1788 To whom it may concern, Please, I wish to keep this anonymous. I joined this internet service, because my old isp, was offline more than on-line. I joined, because, first, I am totally disabled. I always loved reading, or talk- ing to people about many things, but my conditioned worsened and has left me totally incapacitated and in acute pain, 24 hrs. a day and have lost the ability to walk and have no right hand. My wife and family, saw how depressed this got me and suggested getting a cheap computer and going on-line. I can go days without sleep, due to my severe pain. This keeps me on-line for hours at a time, that's why I paid for unlimited use. I received an e-mail the other day, from my new isp, that threatens my use of my isp, that I should consider buying their $240.00 business account, because I was violating their "tos" terms of service. I phoned their business account office and they told me that I was in violation of their "tos", and I requested to know how I was in violation, since nobody but I, use my account and that I paid for unlimited use. Because I am disabled and on a limited lncome and this is why I purchased their $19.95 unlimited user account. I got the impression that if I continued to abuse my service, that I could be cut off, again I requested the reason and again they gave me no reason, just for me to watch it. I don't want to lose a good isp, but I know that I pay for unlimited use and that no company should try and muscle and threaten their customers. I would truely, appreciate your investigating this for me and leave me anonymous. If you need to speak to me, my home phone is (818)337-8153 again, I thank you for your time. Sincerely yours, Tony From hsoos@mtds.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:30 1997 Return-Path: hsoos@mtds.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00482 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:30 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id GAA29824; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:21:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(194.204.200.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029817; Fri, 28 Feb 97 06:21:02 -0500 Received: from mine.mtds.com (ppp13.mtds.com [194.204.200.77]) by mtds.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id LAA10654 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:24:12 GMT Message-ID: <3315FFAD.6728@mtds.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:42:06 +0000 From: "Helen E. Soos" Reply-To: hsoos@mtds.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Telephone companies charges for internet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 676 To whom it may concern: I have just heard that the FCC is considering a request by telephone companies to charge consumers for utilizing their phone lines for the internet. This is an outrage: the telephone companies have already increased their business significantly, by installing additional lines in many businesses and households. Consumers are paying established rates for these lines, and should not be penalized by the "Get richer quicker" mentality of big business. I hope that the FCC does not authorize this increase in the profits of telephone companies. Thank you for protecting us consumers as well as the integrity of business. Sincerely, Helen Soos From hsoos@mtds.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:30 1997 Return-Path: hsoos@mtds.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00485 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:30 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id GAA29837; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:22:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(194.204.200.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029835; Fri, 28 Feb 97 06:22:12 -0500 Received: from mine.mtds.com (ppp13.mtds.com [194.204.200.77]) by mtds.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id LAA10691 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:25:21 GMT Message-ID: <3315FFAD.6728@mtds.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:42:06 +0000 From: "Helen E. Soos" Reply-To: hsoos@mtds.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Telephone companies charges for internet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 676 To whom it may concern: I have just heard that the FCC is considering a request by telephone companies to charge consumers for utilizing their phone lines for the internet. This is an outrage: the telephone companies have already increased their business significantly, by installing additional lines in many businesses and households. Consumers are paying established rates for these lines, and should not be penalized by the "Get richer quicker" mentality of big business. I hope that the FCC does not authorize this increase in the profits of telephone companies. Thank you for protecting us consumers as well as the integrity of business. Sincerely, Helen Soos From hsoos@mtds.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:30 1997 Return-Path: hsoos@mtds.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00488 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:30 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id GAA29849; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:25:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(194.204.200.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029847; Fri, 28 Feb 97 06:25:29 -0500 Received: from mine.mtds.com (ppp13.mtds.com [194.204.200.77]) by mtds.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id LAA10754 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:28:29 GMT Message-ID: <3315FFAD.6728@mtds.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:42:06 +0000 From: "Helen E. Soos" Reply-To: hsoos@mtds.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Telephone companies charges for internet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 676 To whom it may concern: I have just heard that the FCC is considering a request by telephone companies to charge consumers for utilizing their phone lines for the internet. This is an outrage: the telephone companies have already increased their business significantly, by installing additional lines in many businesses and households. Consumers are paying established rates for these lines, and should not be penalized by the "Get richer quicker" mentality of big business. I hope that the FCC does not authorize this increase in the profits of telephone companies. Thank you for protecting us consumers as well as the integrity of business. Sincerely, Helen Soos From gmeserve@nettally.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:31 1997 Return-Path: gmeserve@nettally.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00491 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:31 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id GAA29733; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:04:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from gossimer.nettally.com(199.44.114.224) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029730; Fri, 28 Feb 97 06:04:26 -0500 Received: from gmeserve ([199.44.198.38]) by gossimer.nettally.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-11170) with SMTP id AAA245 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 06:04:23 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970227180422.00694c74@nettally.com> X-Sender: gmeserve@nettally.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:04:23 -0500 To: isp@fcc.gov From: gmeserve@nettally.com (Meserve, George) Subject: modem tax Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Length: 181 Instead of allowing phone companies to kill the net by metering time encourage them to upgrade facilities for digital traffic thereby offloading the net from the analog facilities. From hsoos@mtds.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:31 1997 Return-Path: hsoos@mtds.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00494 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:31 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id FAA29708; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 05:53:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(194.204.200.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029699; Fri, 28 Feb 97 05:53:13 -0500 Received: from mine.mtds.com (ppp12.mtds.com [194.204.200.76]) by mtds.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id KAA10349 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:56:18 GMT Message-ID: <3315FFAD.6728@mtds.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:42:06 +0000 From: "Helen E. Soos" Reply-To: hsoos@mtds.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Telephone companies charges for internet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 676 To whom it may concern: I have just heard that the FCC is considering a request by telephone companies to charge consumers for utilizing their phone lines for the internet. This is an outrage: the telephone companies have already increased their business significantly, by installing additional lines in many businesses and households. Consumers are paying established rates for these lines, and should not be penalized by the "Get richer quicker" mentality of big business. I hope that the FCC does not authorize this increase in the profits of telephone companies. Thank you for protecting us consumers as well as the integrity of business. Sincerely, Helen Soos From desdog@azstarnet.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:32 1997 Return-Path: desdog@azstarnet.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00497 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:31 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id FAA29594; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 05:24:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhost.azstarnet.com(169.197.1.8) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029592; Fri, 28 Feb 97 05:24:16 -0500 Received: from usr8ip26.azstarnet.com (usr8ip26.azstarnet.com [169.197.9.26]) by mailhost.azstarnet.com (8.8.3-p/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA15820 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:17:56 -0700 (MST) Received: by usr8ip26.azstarnet.com with Microsoft Mail id <01BC2526.F0BE0060@usr8ip26.azstarnet.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:24:43 -0700 Message-ID: <01BC2526.F0BE0060@usr8ip26.azstarnet.com> From: "Arthur J. Wiegand" To: "'isp@fcc.gov'" Subject: Telephone Companies !!!! Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:24:27 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 240 Geeze please don't let the telephone companies get into our information = superhighways. The Bill & Al show would certainly look bad, with all the = promotion of the internet use coming from the White House.... Respectfully: Art Wiegand From WJHL99C@prodigy.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:32 1997 Return-Path: WJHL99C@prodigy.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00500 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:32 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id FAA29520; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 05:06:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pimaia2w.prodigy.com(198.83.19.115) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029512; Fri, 28 Feb 97 05:06:03 -0500 Received: from mime4.prodigy.com (mime4.prodigy.com [192.168.254.43]) by pimaia2w.prodigy.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id FAA22912 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 05:00:01 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by mime4.prodigy.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id EAA111200 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:59:25 -0500 Message-Id: <199702280959.EAA111200@mime4.prodigy.com> X-Mailer: Prodigy Internet GW(v0.9beta) - ae01dm04sc03 From: WJHL99C@prodigy.com (MR ED A JONES) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:59:25, -0500 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Modem Tariffs Content-Length: 372 I just wanted to state my opinion concerning the proposed modem tariffs for computer users. In this time of great leaps forward in our communications abilities we need better access to the electronic world. Why not encourage development of new digital lines rather than attempting to increase profits at the cost of the future? Thanks, Ed A. Jones Johnson City, TN From wrs@leblink.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:32 1997 Return-Path: wrs@leblink.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00503 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:32 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id FAA29505; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 05:04:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from shell.leblink.com(206.65.254.193) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029503; Fri, 28 Feb 97 05:04:00 -0500 Received: from [206.65.254.200] (dl00.leblink.com [206.65.254.200]) by shell.leblink.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA28303 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:03:29 -0600 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:07:28 -0600 To: isp@fcc.gov From: wrs@leblink.com (Jake Simcoe) Subject: Phone Company additional charges for Web use. Content-Length: 258 The phone company provides a service for which they are well compensated. The idea that they would even suggest and additional charge for web use is outragous. I cannot immagine that you would even consider such a charge. Sincerely Yours, Wm. J. Simcoe From Ryspop@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:33 1997 Return-Path: Ryspop@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00506 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:32 -0500 From: Ryspop@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id EAA29467; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:55:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout07.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.22) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029465; Fri, 28 Feb 97 04:54:56 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout07.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id EAA17145 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:54:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:54:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228045433_820847322@emout07.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Per minute internet phone charges Content-Length: 232 I just heard about possible legislation that would enact a per-minute local telephone charge for internet use. I am against such a proposal. Would you please take my opinion into account, should this come before you. Thank you. From hsoos@mtds.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:33 1997 Return-Path: hsoos@mtds.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00509 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:33 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id EAA29415; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:41:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(194.204.200.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029411; Fri, 28 Feb 97 04:41:29 -0500 Received: from mine.mtds.com (ppp3.mtds.com [194.204.200.67]) by mtds.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id JAA09681 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:44:34 GMT Message-ID: <3315FFAD.6728@mtds.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:42:06 +0000 From: "Helen E. Soos" Reply-To: hsoos@mtds.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Telephone companies charges for internet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 676 To whom it may concern: I have just heard that the FCC is considering a request by telephone companies to charge consumers for utilizing their phone lines for the internet. This is an outrage: the telephone companies have already increased their business significantly, by installing additional lines in many businesses and households. Consumers are paying established rates for these lines, and should not be penalized by the "Get richer quicker" mentality of big business. I hope that the FCC does not authorize this increase in the profits of telephone companies. Thank you for protecting us consumers as well as the integrity of business. Sincerely, Helen Soos From hsoos@mtds.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:33 1997 Return-Path: hsoos@mtds.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00512 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:33 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id EAA29365; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:33:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(194.204.200.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029363; Fri, 28 Feb 97 04:32:31 -0500 Received: from mine.mtds.com (ppp3.mtds.com [194.204.200.67]) by mtds.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id JAA09582 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:35:19 GMT Message-ID: <3315FFAD.6728@mtds.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:42:06 +0000 From: "Helen E. Soos" Reply-To: hsoos@mtds.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Telephone companies charges for internet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 676 To whom it may concern: I have just heard that the FCC is considering a request by telephone companies to charge consumers for utilizing their phone lines for the internet. This is an outrage: the telephone companies have already increased their business significantly, by installing additional lines in many businesses and households. Consumers are paying established rates for these lines, and should not be penalized by the "Get richer quicker" mentality of big business. I hope that the FCC does not authorize this increase in the profits of telephone companies. Thank you for protecting us consumers as well as the integrity of business. Sincerely, Helen Soos From Strongj@UWSTOUT.EDU Fri Feb 28 11:44:33 1997 Return-Path: Strongj@UWSTOUT.EDU Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00515 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:33 -0500 From: Strongj@UWSTOUT.EDU Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id EAA29376; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:36:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from uwstout.edu(144.13.18.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029373; Fri, 28 Feb 97 04:36:16 -0500 Received: from @uwstout.edu (144.13.6.113) by UWSTOUT.EDU (PMDF V5.0-6 #13282) id <01IFXO396V1S006ZY7@UWSTOUT.EDU> for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:31:41 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:31:41 -0600 (CST) Date-warning: Date header was inserted by UWSTOUT.EDU Subject: This per minute surcharge and people vs Telcoms. X-Sender: Strongj@uwstout.edu To: isp@fcc.gov Message-id: <01IFXO39PVUQ006ZY7@UWSTOUT.EDU> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-Length: 1191 Excuse me, I thought America was the home of the free, and the brave. This idea of adding a charge on to a medium, that is already so vast, that would be hard to regulate is ubsurd. We are already for the most part charged out and above, what most of us can pay, for just our telephones. This ploy is somethign the the Telephone companies want to add more coin to a already huge pocket. To add such a thing as a charge is wrong and its already tapped by many sources across the world. I do not like seeing my local cable television bill skyrocketing because you officals have nothing better to do than to aceppt bribes from the Communication companies. I love this country to death, and I am no right wing, or left wing person I believe in moderation for all things. This is going to far already our phone bills, are above what they should be; yet it goes on. How can you think things will go on like this until there is nothing left that is not taxed or charged extra. I have no complaints with our tax system just so you know, but in this age of mass communication its ridiculous, to even consider asurcharge for internet access.... James.......... From jdmac@zam0.attnet.or.jp Fri Feb 28 11:44:34 1997 Return-Path: jdmac@zam0.attnet.or.jp Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00518 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:33 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id EAA29307; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:25:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.zama.attnet.or.jp(165.76.83.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029305; Fri, 28 Feb 97 04:24:55 -0500 Received: from mcclaskey by zam0.attnet.or.jp (8.7.5+Spin/3.4W4-PP-R4(10/07/96)) id SAA03028; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 18:24:30 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199702280924.SAA03028@zam0.attnet.or.jp> From: "Jeffrey W. McClaskey" To: Subject: Access to the Internet Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 18:27:51 +0900 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 177 Don't attempt to charge for the lines, I am paying already. If you want to join the circus, set up your own Netscape and charge for that, but don't put us in double jeopardy. From hsoos@mtds.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:34 1997 Return-Path: hsoos@mtds.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00521 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:34 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id EAA29335; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:30:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(194.204.200.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029314; Fri, 28 Feb 97 04:29:29 -0500 Received: from mine.mtds.com (ppp3.mtds.com [194.204.200.67]) by mtds.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id JAA09538 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:32:30 GMT Message-ID: <3315FFAD.6728@mtds.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:42:06 +0000 From: "Helen E. Soos" Reply-To: hsoos@mtds.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Telephone companies charges for internet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 676 To whom it may concern: I have just heard that the FCC is considering a request by telephone companies to charge consumers for utilizing their phone lines for the internet. This is an outrage: the telephone companies have already increased their business significantly, by installing additional lines in many businesses and households. Consumers are paying established rates for these lines, and should not be penalized by the "Get richer quicker" mentality of big business. I hope that the FCC does not authorize this increase in the profits of telephone companies. Thank you for protecting us consumers as well as the integrity of business. Sincerely, Helen Soos From paratrooper@worldnet.att.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:42 1997 Return-Path: paratrooper@worldnet.att.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00524 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:34 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id EAA29142; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:08:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhost.worldnet.att.net(204.127.131.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029139; Fri, 28 Feb 97 04:08:12 -0500 Received: from 770138629worldnet ([207.147.98.189]) by mtigwc03.worldnet.att.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0613 ) with ESMTP id AAA9313 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:01:25 +0000 From: "Mike" To: Subject: Has any1 argued that ISPs may build &/or purchase their own phone companies? Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:08:08 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19970228090124.AAA9313@770138629worldnet> Content-Length: 1 From paratrooper@worldnet.att.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:42 1997 Return-Path: paratrooper@worldnet.att.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00528 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:42 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id EAA29110; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:03:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhost.worldnet.att.net(204.127.131.33) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma029107; Fri, 28 Feb 97 04:03:13 -0500 Received: from 770138629worldnet ([207.147.98.189]) by mtigwc04.worldnet.att.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0613 ) with ESMTP id AAA54 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:00:44 +0000 From: "Mike" To: Subject: The extra money phone companies make as a result of Internet Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 04:03:13 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19970228090043.AAA54@770138629worldnet> Content-Length: 260 Please b advised, that the phone companies have an enormous increase in both telephone installations (they do make a profit on these things), and monthly service charges for modem using customers, u no, the additional phone lines. Thank you 4 ure kind attn. From dano@accessnv.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:42 1997 Return-Path: dano@accessnv.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00531 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:42 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id DAA28964; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:59:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from bighorn.accessnv.com(206.29.25.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma028962; Fri, 28 Feb 97 03:58:32 -0500 Received: from default (ppp004.anv.net [205.199.152.14]) by bighorn.accessnv.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA02341 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:59:25 -0800 Message-ID: <33169E15.2E0F@accessnv.com> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:57:57 -0800 From: April X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Unacceptable!!!! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 183 The idea of charging a per minute fee for internet access is insane. Please don't tell me the FCC is being lobbied by the phone companys. I will help fight this idea until I am dead! From along@inu.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:43 1997 Return-Path: along@inu.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00534 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:42 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id DAA28893; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:51:00 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199702280851.DAA28893@gatekeeper2.fcc.gov> Received: from downtown.inu.net(208.129.164.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma028890; Fri, 28 Feb 97 03:50:38 -0500 Received: from [208.129.164.62] by downtown.inu.net (SMTPD32-3.02) id ACEE879500DC; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 02:53:02 -0600 From: "Amy Toomim Long" To: Subject: CC Docket No 96-263 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 02:56:26 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 276 RE: CC Docket No 96-263 The phone company just wants to make more money. The idea of charging by the minute is just there way of trying to make money off of other peoples ideas. Don't let them get away with this! Sincerely, Amy Long 300 Champions #104 Lufkin, TX 75901 From TBurgener@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:43 1997 Return-Path: TBurgener@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00537 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:43 -0500 From: TBurgener@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id DAA28798; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:31:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout12.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.38) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma028793; Fri, 28 Feb 97 03:31:09 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout12.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id DAA01802 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:30:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:30:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228033045_278520594@emout12.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: DO NOT CHARGE PER MINUTE Content-Length: 237 Please don't let the local phone companies charge per minute for phone usage to connect to a computer phone number (like an internet service provider). This would ruin the internet industry and hurt many poketbooks. -Timothy Burgener From WVinzant@ix.netcom.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:43 1997 Return-Path: WVinzant@ix.netcom.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00540 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:43 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id DAA28565; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:06:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from dfw-ix11.ix.netcom.com(206.214.98.11) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma028563; Fri, 28 Feb 97 03:06:19 -0500 Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix11.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id CAA20473 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 02:05:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from hay-ca6-41.ix.netcom.com(206.214.147.105) by dfw-ix11.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma020466; Fri Feb 28 02:05:27 1997 Message-ID: <3316218C.DC1@ix.netcom.com> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:07:22 +0000 From: Warren Vinzant Reply-To: WVinzant@ix.netcom.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Electronic Submission Only Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2438 Regarding CC Docket No. 96-263: Local telephone companies should not be allowed to assess interstate access charges against Internet Service Providers, or in any way require the payment of time-related charges against internet related use of the present public switched network. As a technical professional with a personal and business interest in seeing the internet continue to grow, I have a particularly unique perspective regarding the Local Telephone Company request for access charges. The vitality of the internet has grown only in the environment of unlimited fixed price access. The commecial attraction to the internet rides strictly on the amount of exposure that a given internet presence provides to the Web Page owner/service provider. In the present environment, internet users can explore the Web at their leisure, and for unlimited time. While exploring the Web, they have no pressures to stop exploring due to the cost of the time spent on the activity. This provides an environment in which more Web sites are seen by every user, therefore expanding the exposure of a Web Page owner/service provider.This is like "window shopping". In a general marketplace such as this, people do not pay to window shop. In an environment in which the Web user must "watch the clock", users will only go on line to quickly perform known existing operations, and will do so only with known web service providers. The ability to attract new business through advertising on the web, and gaining exposure through user exploration will be reduced significantly. An excellent example of what happens in the time-charged environment is the situation in Europe. Europe is FAR behind the US in internet activity precisely because of the excesively high charges for local telephone access to the internet. For the most part these countries have recognized that there is a significant problem that is holding them back from this important new technological arena, and THEY ARE TRYING TO REVERSE THE EXACT SITUATION THAT THE ACCESS CHARGES HERE WOULD CREATE! Charging access fees or allowing other time related charges will destroy the internet. It will damage a new and important area of commerce, perhaps irreparably. It would put the US behind the rest of the world in a strategic technology. Any efforts to allow these charges should be rejected. Thank you for your attention Warren Vinzant 2419 Irma Way Castro Valley CA 94546 From ken@ccsi.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:44 1997 Return-Path: ken@ccsi.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00543 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:43 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id CAA28516; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 02:55:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from infinity.ccsi.com(198.6.201.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma028514; Fri, 28 Feb 97 02:55:39 -0500 Received: (from ken@localhost) by ccsi.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id BAA17584; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:46:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:46:25 -0600 (CST) From: Ken Loveless To: isp@fcc.gov cc: jyc3@aol.com, joecal@intellinet.com Subject: fcc (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Length: 1469 Dear isp, The FCC shouldn't let the phone companies charge extra for using the telephone lines for internet communications. The message below is one of several that I'm sure you have received. I'm glad to add my 2 cents worth and encourage everyone else to do the same. Regards, Ken Loveless ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 14:04:04 -0500 From: Ann Del Llano To: ken@ccsi.com Subject: fcc this is worth at least one e-mail to the fcc: I am writing you this to inform you of a very important matter currently under review by the FCC. Your local telephone company has filed a proposal with the FCC to impose per minute charges for your internet service. They contend that your usage has or will hinder the operation of the telephone network. It is my belief that internet usage will diminish if users were required to pay additional per minute charges. Send your comments to isp@fcc.gov and tell them what you think. Also, if only this country authorizes a per-minute charge for internet users, our share of the global economy will continue to shrink. Every phone company is in on this one, and they are trying to sneak it in just under the wire for litigation. Let everyone you know hear this one. Get the e-mail address to everyone you can think of. isp@fcc.gov Please forward this email to all your friends on the internet so all our voices may be heard! David A. Schulman via Ann del Llano From bluestar@fbo.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:44 1997 Return-Path: bluestar8@fbo.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00546 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:44 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id CAA28427; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 02:35:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from server.fbo.com(143.227.4.67) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma028425; Fri, 28 Feb 97 02:35:55 -0500 Received: from bluestar8 (du81.fbo.com [143.227.4.81]) by server.fbo.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-12750) with ESMTP id AAA236 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:31:47 -0800 From: "Stella Blue" To: Subject: Fw: TO THE Federal Communications Commission (FCC) RE: PER-MINUTE USAGE CHARGES\PHONE CO. Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:35:43 -0800 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19970228073144943.AAA236@du81.fbo.com> Content-Length: 1766 ---------- | From: Stella Blue | To: isp@fcc.gov | Cc: Don Bindley ; joann hoots ; mom & dad hoots ; Sandie & Chuck Rymal ; Barb & Dave | Subject: TO THE Federal Communications Commission (FCC) RE: PER-MINUTE USAGE CHARGES\PHONE CO. | Date: Sunday, February 23, 1997 10:43 PM | | I perceive the telephone companies' PROPOSED PER-MINUTE USAGE CHARGES as | yet another obstacle to the goal of raising the standards of living for | EVERYONE in the United States of America, which would make us a stronger | nation--a chain is only as strong as its weakest link. | | The excellent tool for learning called the Internet would become | unavailable to the general public and would become accessible only to those | able to afford it. | | The Internet is an invaluable means of educating large segments of the | population who would otherwise have no access to the INFORMnation | available there easily and without a lot of expense. | How else can we get bright kids with potential out of ghettos and out of | generational bondages (such as alcoholism, violence, welfare) and into our | working force so that this country can grow? We need to have INEXPENSIVE | learning tools available to the VOLUNTEER and humbly-budgeted organizations | and individuals who strive to educate EVERYONE in our country. We also | need to have this type of easily-accessed and affordable information | available to struggling middle-income families, single parents, and | students. | | Surely the phone companies are able to finance themselves and their growing | operational expenses in ways which will not penalize the American public or | be an instrument of DISCRIMINATION? | From a-dawns@MICROSOFT.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:44 1997 Return-Path: a-dawns@MICROSOFT.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00549 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:44 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id CAA28344; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 02:18:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail2.microsoft.com(131.107.3.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma028342; Fri, 28 Feb 97 02:18:18 -0500 Received: by INET-02-IMC.microsoft.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63) id <01BC2504.5E43CD90@INET-02-IMC.microsoft.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:17:15 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Dawn Shipway (General)" To: "'ISP@fcc.gov'" Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:19:28 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63 Encoding: 12 TEXT Content-Length: 397 I am sending this e-mail in support of your recent decision regarding local phone companies wanting to charge per minute fees for internet connection. Thank you for standing up for us. Charging per minute fees for access would price too many people out of this wonderful new opportunity available to all of us. Dawn Shipway 9494 Woodinville-Redmond Rd #301W Redmond WA 98052 (206) 861-1702 From jerryr@wcnet.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:45 1997 Return-Path: jerryr@wcnet.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00552 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:44 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id BAA27975; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:53:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(206.31.171.62) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027972; Fri, 28 Feb 97 01:53:25 -0500 Received: from jer.wcnet.com ([206.31.171.52]) by Wilma.wcnet.com (post.office MTA v1.9.1 **** trial license expired ****) with SMTP id AAA180 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 12:38:37 -0600 Message-Id: <2.2.32.19970228064313.0068c294@mail.wcnet.com> X-Sender: jerryr@mail.wcnet.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:43:13 -0600 To: isp@fcc.gov From: Jerry Rehak Subject: Against Additional Charges Content-Length: 82 Additional charges are not warranted for services that are already charged for From Ren8sance@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:45 1997 Return-Path: Ren8sance@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00555 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:45 -0500 From: Ren8sance@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id BAA27977; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:53:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout01.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.92) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027973; Fri, 28 Feb 97 01:53:34 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout01.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id BAA19497 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:53:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:53:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228015310_307260646@emout01.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: DO NOT CHARGE FOR INTERNET USE Content-Length: 456 If you decide to charge for per-minute use of the internet, I certainly will use it a lot less. I will use that time to search out some phone company that will not charge for per-minute use. I think that it is an outrageous move to make and falls into the realm of "price-gouging." What an infuriating proposition, and I am sad to see that this idea ever made it further than the thick skull of some slimy businessman/lawyer. Sincerely, Andrew Midgley From mcmoke00@dons.ac.usfca.edu Fri Feb 28 11:44:45 1997 Return-Path: mcmoke00@dons.ac.usfca.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00558 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:45 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id BAA27897; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:47:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from dons.ac.usfca.edu(138.202.32.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027892; Fri, 28 Feb 97 01:47:42 -0500 Received: (from mcmoke00@localhost) by dons.ac.usfca.edu (8.8.2/8.8.2) id WAA01427 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:47:30 -0800 From: Mc Morrow Message-Id: <199702280647.WAA01427@dons.ac.usfca.edu> Subject: Phone charges To: isp@fcc.gov Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:47:30 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 489 This message is to register my opposition to my local phone company trying to charge me for internet service. This is a ridiculous proposition designed to milk more money out of consumers. On top of that, is a ploy by the phone companies to try and sieze power from those who run the Internet. There has been no change in my phone service, no problems, delays, etc. in the 3 years I have been Online. To those at the FCC, I am strongly opposed to this plan. Thank you Kelly McMorrow From frankn@smartlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:46 1997 Return-Path: frankn@smartlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00561 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:45 -0500 From: frankn@smartlink.net Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id BAA27888; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:46:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from smartlink.net(204.118.4.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027886; Fri, 28 Feb 97 01:46:24 -0500 Received: from pm21-52.smartlink.net by warp10.smartlink.net(8.6.12/SMARTLINK-1.0) with id WAA22147 SMTP for on Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:48:44 -0800 Message-Id: <199702280648.WAA22147@warp10.smartlink.net> Comments: Authenticated sender is To: isp@fcc.gov Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:45:57 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: CC Docket Numbers 96-262, 94-1, 91-213, and 96-263 CC: reinerth@gs.net X-Confirm-Reading-To: frankn@smartlink.net X-pmrqc: 1 Return-receipt-to: frankn@smartlink.net Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.52) Content-Length: 820 I wish to strongly express my objection to the tariff increase proposed by the telephone companies. They complain that the increase in usage due to internet users is causing an overload on their equipment (which was paid for by those people who subscribe to the telephone companies' service and pay installation and monthly usage fees). If the problem is so drastic, why is it that the telephone companies are initiating and promoting their own Internet Service Provider organizations which would exacerbate the problem. It would appear that the telco's are attempting to initiate usage fees which would force private providers out of the business and make it available only to those who have free access to the telephone lines (that being the telephone companies who would then monopolize the industry). From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:46 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00564 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:46 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id BAA27840; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:39:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027833; Fri, 28 Feb 97 01:39:24 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id WAA26094 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:39:00 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:39:00 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702280639.WAA26094@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: cevc@pacbell.net Subject: Form Data from 207.104.100.180 Content-Length: 569 Date: Thu Feb 27 22:39:00 PST 1997 = 3760 Florida St, #111 city = San Diego comments = email = cevc@pacbell.net name = Christian Van Cleave regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = CA statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 92104 From chew@edm.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:46 1997 Return-Path: chew@edm.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00567 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:46 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id BAA27795; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:32:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.edm.net(206.103.180.11) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027793; Fri, 28 Feb 97 01:32:01 -0500 Received: from default (port208.edm.net) by mail.edm.net with SMTP (1.37.109.20/16.2) id AA023101496; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:31:36 -0800 Message-Id: <330292DF.1C38@edm.net> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 20:04:47 -0800 From: Steve Reply-To: chew@edm.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: (no subject) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 110 Please do not allow the telephone companies to charge for internet connection time. Steven R. Chew, D.D.S. From boneman@col-net.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:47 1997 Return-Path: boneman@col-net.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00570 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:46 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id BAA27712; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:22:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns1.mainnet.net(207.105.52.11) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027708; Fri, 28 Feb 97 01:22:34 -0500 Received: from default ([207.105.53.250]) by ns1.mainnet.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA23029; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:28:14 -0800 Message-ID: <33167951.3E61@col-net.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:21:05 -0800 From: "Richard E. Quinn" Organization: N.A. X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ISP@fcc.gov CC: noack@mail.doitnow.com Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 963 The proposed per minute charges for internet providers by the phone companies for local calls is the one of the most stupid ideas they have ever come up with. I'm on SSI and use the internet to find answers and information about my medical condition. I would not be able to afford that if there was a per minute charge. Why do the phone companies need to make more money? Greed. The internet is the most importent invention for the improvement of the human condition since the printing press. Now the phone companies want access only for the wealthy. No way, don't let this happen. Signed Richard E. Quinn, 5680 Sawtelle Blvd., Apt. E, Culver City, CA 90230 Phone (310) 397-5573 --

From 0002071478@mcimail.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:47 1997 Return-Path: 0002071478@mcimail.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00573 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:47 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id BAA27641; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:16:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from gatekeeper.mcimail.com(192.147.45.5) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027635; Fri, 28 Feb 97 01:16:43 -0500 Received: from mailgate.mcimail.com (mailgate.mcimail.com [166.40.135.3]) by gatekeeper.mcimail.com (8.6.12/8.6.10) with SMTP id FAA18737; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 05:59:52 GMT Received: from mcimail.com by mailgate.mcimail.com id aa20598; 28 Feb 97 6:18 WET Date: Fri, 28 Feb 97 01:17 EST From: Carolyn Robinson <0002071478@mcimail.com> To: FCC Cc: "Duane E. Richmond" <0005237175@mcimail.com>, Missouri Attorney General , "J. B. Jet Banks" , Roseann Bentley , "William L. Clay, Jr." , "Phil B. Curls" , Ronnie DePasco , Steve Ehlmann , "Francis E. Flotron" , Wayne Goode , Sam Graves , Ted House , "J. T. Howard" , Sidney Johnson , Bill Kenney , Peter Kinder , David Klarich , "James L. Mathewson" , Joe Maxwell , "William P. McKenna" , Walt Mueller , "Edward E. Quick" , Larry Rohrbach , "John E. Scott" , Betty Sims , Marvin Singleton , Danny Staples , Morris Westfall , Harry Wiggins , Vicky Riback Wilson , Fred Pouche , "Charles R. Pryor" , Chuck Purgason , "Bill L. Ransdall" , Annie Reinhart , "Randall H. Relford" , "David L. Reynolds" , "Mark L. Richardson" , Estel Robirds , Mary Lou Salle , Mike Schilling , David Schwab , Delbert Scott , Sue Shear , "Norman E. Sheldon" , "O.L. Shelton" , "Charles W. Shields" , Bill Skaggs , Don Steen , Lana Stokan , Steve Stoll , Carol Stroker , Don Summers , Chuck Surface , Phil Tate , Larry Thomason , Charles Quincy Troupe , Tim Van Zandt , Carl Vogel , Deleta Williams , "Marilyn A. Williams" , Ron Auer , "Gracia Y. Backer" , Charles Ballard , Rex Barnett , Joan Barry , Linda Bartelsmeyer , Jon Bennet , Judy Berkstresser , Matt Boatright , Dennis Bonner , Bill Boucher , Joan Bray , "David W. Broach" , "Gary L. Burton" , "Paula J. Carter" , Norma Champion , Rich Chrismer , "Connie J. Cierpiot" , Robert Clayton , Gene Copeland , Larry Crawford , "Wayne F. Crump" , Lloyd Daniel , Fletcher Daniels , Dorathea Davis , Jim Howerton , "Mitchell E. Rocky Johnson" , "Sandra D. Kauffman" , Pat Kelley , Glenda Kelly , Harry Kennedy , Jim Kreider , Scott Lakin , Kenneth Legan , Chris Liese , "William C. Linton" , Don Lograsso , "Beth L. Long" , John Loudon , Bill Luetkenhaus , "Brian H. May" , Carol Jean Mays , "Emmy L. McClelland" , Steve McLuckie , Ronnie Miller , "Ralph A. Monaco" , "Dana L. Murray" , "Patrick A. Naeger" , Patrick OConnor , "James P. OToole" , Cindy Ostmann , "Francis S. Overschmidt" , Kelly Parker , Jewell Patek , "Rita D. Davis" , Jon Dolan , "Laurie B. Donovan" , Patrick Dougherty , Marilyn Edwards-Pavia , "T. Mark Elliott" , "Catherine S. Enz" , Brent Evans , Nancy Farmer , Ted Farnen , Rodger Fitzwater , James Michael Foley , "Louis H. Ford" , "Bill L. Foster" , Richard Franklin , Charlie Fritts , "James V. Froelker" , Sam Gaskill , Steve Gaw , "Michael R. Gibbons" , Russell Goward , Chuck Graham , Jim Graham , "Timothy P. Green" , Charles Gross , "Mary M. Hagan-Harrell" , Glenn Hall , Tim Harlan , Ed Hartzler , Vicky Hartzler , Joe Heckemeyer , "Daniel J. Hegeman" , Carl Hendrickson , John Hickey , Katherine Hollingsworth , Thomas Hoppe , Craig Hosmer , President William Jefferson Clinton , Vice-President Al Gore , "Mrs. Hillary Clinton" , Attorney General Jay Nixon , "Lieutenant Governor Roger B. Wilson" , Governor Mel Carnahan Subject: Per Minute Charges for Internet Message-Id: <97022806174966/0002071478PJ4EM@MCIMAIL.COM> Content-Length: 6406 -- [ From: Carolyn J Robinson * EMC.Ver #3.2 ] -- Gentlemen/Ladies: I wish to file a formal complaint against the LEC/BOC's attempt in imposing per minute charges for Internet usage. This exhorbitant increase would drastically impact many Internet user's by prohibiting their usage due to cost constraints! As a former PAT Parent Educator and Speech Services Paraprofessional; the computer age has brought the world to remote school districts and children. These youth, who may never be able to travel overseas, let alone to a neighboring city, cannot be thwarted the opportunities to explore the universe from their homes or classrooms. It would be detrimental to our young people's future if this ruling is passed. The repercussions from limited access at schools, no access in rural, low-income areas, etc.; all because increased charges would make it unaffordable for these persons to benefit from services, research, and technologies via the Internet. Why not have the LEC's address the real issue; they want in the Internet market so badly and do not have the network capacity or technology of major providers! How else can they afford to monopolize the telco industry? Without additional monies provided by this bogus and feeble attempt in funding their Internet interests, they might not be as powerful and controlling as they are today! Carolyn Robinson PO Box 234 Reeds Spring, MO 65737 The entire FCC fact sheet follows: ********************************** [ Text Version | WordPerfect Version | ISP Home Page ] THE FCC, INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS AND ACCESS CHARGES This fact sheet offers informal guidance on an issue that has generated a great deal of public interest. For more specific details about the proceedings currently before the Commission, please visit our web site (http://www.fcc. gov/isp.html) or public reference room or call our duplicating contractor for a copy of CC Docket Numbers 96-262, 94-1, 91-213 and 96-263. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has requested public comment on issues relating to the charges that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and similar companies pay to local telephone companies. On December 24, 1996, the FCC opened a proceeding to reform the system of interstate access charges. Each long distance telephone call you make includes per-minute fees that your long distance carrier pays to the originating and terminating local telephone companies over whose facilities that call also travelled. Those fees, which are designed to recover the costs to local telephone companies for use of their facilities, are referred to as "access charges." As part of this proceeding, the FCC sought comment on the treatment of ISPand other "enhanced service providers" that also use local telephone companies' facilities. Since the access charge system was established in 1983, enhanced service providers have been classified as "end users" rather than "carriers" for purposes of the access charge rules, and therefore they do not pay the per- minute access charges that long-distance companies pay to local telephone companies. This issue is being considered on two different tracks. I. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Access Charge Reform The Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) on Access Charge Reform seeks comment on proposals to restructure the entire system of access charges paid to local telephone companies. The Commission is seeking to make the access charge system more consistent with the development of local competition in the telephone industry, and with principles of economic efficiency. As part of this process, the Commission considered whether enhanced service providers, such as ISPs, should be required to pay interstate access charges. The Commission tentatively concludes that ISPs should not be subject to access charges as currently constituted. If you want to learn more about this issue you should read paragraphs 282 through 290 in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the rest of the document covers other issues). You can also access this document on the FCC's Web site, or you can obtain this section of the document by calling our fax on demand system at 202/418-2830 and requesting document numbers, 96-262, 94-1, 91-213 and 96-263. The final deadline for comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is Friday, February 14, 1997. You can submit formal comments by delivering or mailing five copies to: Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room 239, 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20554. You can also send informal comments via email. If your email concerns the question of whether Internet and other enhanced service providers should pay access charges, it should be addressed to isp@fcc.gov. If your email concerns other issues in the Access Reform NPRM, it should be addressed to access@fcc.gov. II. Notice of Inquiry On Internet and Interstate Information Services In a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) launched with this same Access Reform proceeding, the FCC is seeking to identify what policies would best facilitate the development of the high-bandwidth data networks of the future, while preserving efficient incentives for investment and innovation in the underlying voice network. The NOI does not make any specific proposals, but seeks comment generally on the implications of information services such as Internet access for the telephone network. If you want to learn more about this issue you should read paragraphs 311 through 318, the NOI contained within the Access Reform document. You can also obtain this document from the FCC's Web site, or you can obtain this section of the document by calling our fax on demand system at 202/418-2830 and requesting document numbers, 96-262, 94-1, 91-213, and 96-263. The deadline for comments on the Notice of Inquiry is March 24, 1997. Reply comments, submitted in response to the initial round of comments, will be accepted through the close of business on April 23, 1997. You can submit formal comments by delivering or mailing five copies to: Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room 239, 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20554. You can also send informal comments via email by addressing them to isp@fcc.gov. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From Michel70@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:47 1997 Return-Path: Michel70@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00576 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:47 -0500 From: Michel70@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id BAA27509; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:02:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout06.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.97) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027505; Fri, 28 Feb 97 01:02:48 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout06.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id BAA07683 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:02:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:02:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228010224_139509455@emout06.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Per Minute Charges Content-Length: 422 Per minute charges would be unfair ... the internet is a growing medium for communication and business ... charging per minute fees would lower usage of internet ... which means less business and communication ... use of the internet means more business for telephone companies with all the calls going to ISPs and online services .. and with these calls they are getting money .. which should cover costs. thank you. From rickp@jcave.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:48 1997 Return-Path: rickp@jcave.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00579 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:47 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA27434; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:50:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from door.jcave.com(204.130.210.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027431; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:50:22 -0500 Received: from rickp.jcave.com (p109.cs2.jcave.com [204.130.210.109]) by door.jcave.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA20669; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:52:41 -0700 Message-Id: <199702280552.WAA20669@door.jcave.com> From: "SysCon Consulting" To: Cc: "Ted Twibey" , "Rich Chiles" , "Nessa" , "Kal Parmer" , "Jerry Nelson" , "JCave Admin" , "Eric" , "Dave Bitter" , "Craig Iverson" , "Alan Tebbs" Subject: Internet Rates Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:49:58 -0700 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 814 Hmmm... based on what I have read and conversations I've had with my local telephone provider (US West) pertaining to an increase/surcharge in Internet access fee's, I am at a loss to understand why the telephone companies want to invest the money(s) in expanding the current system as apposed to updating to a digitally based system (ISDN, etc.). Seems to me this is in effect the same as updating a Model T Ford to compete with a Maserati !!!!! What's going on ??? I hope the FCC doesn't bow to the ways of special interest groups.... after all, isn't there a "For Sale" sign out in front of the White House... you know, for $10K, you can sleep in the Lincoln Bedroom. God only knows where you could sleep if you gave $100K !!!! I think one (1) "For Sale" sign is enough. Rick Pleasants SysCon Consulting From webmaster@col-net.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:48 1997 Return-Path: webmaster@col-net.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00582 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:48 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA27410; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:48:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns1.mainnet.net(207.105.52.11) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027408; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:48:31 -0500 Received: from station13 ([207.105.53.239]) by ns1.mainnet.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA22771 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:54:11 -0800 Message-ID: <33167383.1BF9@col-net.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:56:19 -0800 From: Computers On-Line Reply-To: webmaster@col-net.com Organization: Computers On-Line X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ISP@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 870 This letter is to protest the proposed additional per minutecharges requested by the telephone companies. It is my belief that Internet usage will diminish if users were required to pay additional per minute charges. Your agency is supposed to protect consumers not the telephone company. It could hurt or destroy many small businesses as well as deprive children in schools of their access to Internet resources and interactiveprojects. It will hurt all Americans. The only beneficiaries would be the telephone companies. Thanks, Earl V. Cunanan --=20 ******************************************** Computers On-Line, Inc. 1062 Westwood Blvd. =95 Los Angeles, CA 90024 Tel: 310-209-7855 =95 Fax: 310-209-7859 E-mail: webmaster@col-net.com http://www.countries.com ******************************************* From DLewis3646@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:48 1997 Return-Path: DLewis3646@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00585 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:48 -0500 From: DLewis3646@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA27364; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:42:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout05.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.96) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027360; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:42:27 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout05.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA10344 for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:42:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:42:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228004204_1813146788@emout05.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: telephone per min charge Content-Length: 374 Sirs, If this this ruling is passed, I think that it will greatly hinder the growth of the internet. The telephone companies are getting more than their share of profit, from the many extra lines that internet users are requesting. I for one will stop using the net and will terminate my extra line if these charges go through, as will many others. Thank You, Don Lewis From GDEJ92A@prodigy.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:49 1997 Return-Path: GDEJ92A@prodigy.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00588 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:48 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA27329; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:39:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from pimaia4w.prodigy.com(198.83.18.139) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027327; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:39:09 -0500 Received: from mime3.prodigy.com (mime3.prodigy.com [192.168.253.27]) by pimaia4w.prodigy.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA25262 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:28:25 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by mime3.prodigy.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id XAA58744 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:44:38 -0500 Message-Id: <199702280444.XAA58744@mime3.prodigy.com> X-Mailer: Prodigy Internet GW(v0.9beta) - ae01dm04sc03 From: GDEJ92A@prodigy.com (MRS ROSEMARY HURLEY) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:44:38, -0500 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: NOI (CC Docket No. 96-263) Content-Length: 465 I urge you not to allow local phone companies to charge fees for usuage of internet access numbers. Local access should be totally free whether by voice or computer. Phone companies would destroy the internet if you allow this action. This would destroy any confidence consumers have in the FCC as a regulatory agency with our interests upermost in their decision making policy. Thank You, Mrs. Edward B. Hurley 1804 S Holly Ave Sioux Falls, SD 57105-2406 From bussbj@craft.camp.clarkson.edu Fri Feb 28 11:44:49 1997 Return-Path: bussbj@craft.camp.clarkson.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00591 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:49 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA27336; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:40:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from omnigate.clarkson.edu(128.153.4.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027333; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:39:55 -0500 Received: from craft.camp.clarkson.edu by omnigate.clarkson.edu with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #7) id m0w0L4O-001VMEC; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:41 EST Received: from far201a.dorm.clarkson.edu by craft.camp.clarkson.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA07945; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:38:15 -0500 Received: by far201a.dorm.clarkson.edu with Microsoft Mail id <01BC250F.F8B54E20@far201a.dorm.clarkson.edu>; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:40:18 -0500 Message-Id: <01BC250F.F8B54E20@far201a.dorm.clarkson.edu> From: Benjamin James Buss To: "'isp@fcc.gov'" Subject: per minute charges on net time Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:40:16 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 978 It is unrealistic for many to pay the amount it would naturally cost = them if they had to pay per minute charges on Internet time. My = computer, for instance, is perpetually on the net. It has been on the = net for about 3 weeks now - 7 days a week - 24 hours a day. There is no = way I could possible afford even 20 hours time a month on per minute = charges. Please do not allow the phone companies to do this or I fear = serious repercussions will arise. Thank you for your time.=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------- Ben J. Buss * "What this country needs is=20 bussbj@craft.clarkson.edu * a dime that will buy a good bjb5@craft.clarkson.edu * five-cent bagel." SE_970075@tccsa.ohio.gov * ~ Unknown -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------- Homepage is now at http://far201a.dorm.clarkson.edu, but is still = trashy.=20 From ginetteb@videotron.ca Fri Feb 28 11:44:49 1997 Return-Path: ginetteb@videotron.ca Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00594 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:49 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA27232; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:32:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from bizet.videotron.net(205.151.222.75) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027228; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:31:59 -0500 Received: from Hiron (ppp145.81.mque.videotron.net [207.253.81.145]) by bizet.videotron.net (8.8.5/8.8.2) with SMTP id AAA23539 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:31:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <33169A37.77C2@videotron.ca> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:41:27 -0800 From: GINETTE X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01I [fr] (Win95; I; 16bit) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: FCC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 456 Hi, I strongly object to this proposal with the FCC to impose per minute charges for the internet service. We are supposed to live in a free democratic country wich supports the fundamental law of liberty of expression and the rights wich we work hard to obtain. When a government stars to act as "Big Brother" we are in "Big Trouble" p.s. "Absolute power corrupts absolutely" --Shakespeare That's what I think about the FCC! bye! Ginette! From rjr@digisys.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:57 1997 Return-Path: rjr@digisys.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00597 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:49 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA27210; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:29:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from relay1.uu.net(192.48.96.5) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma027208; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:29:35 -0500 Received: from netrix.net by relay1.UU.NET with ESMTP (peer crosschecked as: sapphire.netrix.net [205.138.110.200]) id QQceun12884; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:29:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from default (modem97.digisys.net [205.138.110.146]) by netrix.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id WAA05280 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:28:37 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <33166CEF.6502@digisys.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:28:15 -0700 From: The Kalispell Redingers Reply-To: rjr@digisys.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Phone Co.'s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 171 I objectto any change in how the telephone companies handle line use for inter-net connections! Robert J. Redinger 513 Crestview Road Kalispell, MT 59901 rjr@digisys.net From ramcomp1@idt.net Fri Feb 28 11:44:58 1997 Return-Path: ramcomp1@idt.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00600 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:57 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26908; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:10:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from u2.farm.idt.net(169.132.8.11) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026897; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:10:02 -0500 Received: from 1242.IOS.COM (wks-47.ts-3.idt.net [169.132.7.47]) by u2.farm.idt.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA05611 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:09:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <33166980.6A6@idt.net> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:13:36 -0500 From: Robert Ramirez X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Telephone Company Per Minute Rates on Internet Access Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 670 The railroad that connected the East to the West is one of the great accomplishments of this nation that helped make it the largest industrial power of the world. We are at another crucial point in the history of the United States that will effect Americans for generations to come. It is the duty of the United States government to protect and nuture projects that are paramount to the national security and welfare of all Americans. In the information age the country with the most free flow of information will win. We must not allow greed to hinder progress. Our forefathers did the right thing. Are we going to let them down? Robert Ramirez ramcomp1@idt.net From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:58 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00603 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:58 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26769; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout16.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026751; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:54 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA15198; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000426_-1507395480@emout16.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Space Dude MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 19 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:58 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00606 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:58 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26816; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout05.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.96) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026802; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:05:27 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout05.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA15054; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000500_1846699457@emout05.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS msie 3.0 build 1110 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 22 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:59 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00609 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:58 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26734; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout04.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.95) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026706; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:36 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout04.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA01184; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000409_1612332608@emout04.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS NHL POWERPLAY (o1/o3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 18 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:59 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00612 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:59 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26791; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout06.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.97) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026759; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:05:06 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout06.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA29298; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000439_207384620@emout06.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS MegaMan 2 SNES Emulator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 20 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:44:59 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00615 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:59 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26787; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout03.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.94) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026758; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:05:05 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout03.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA14812; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000435_44154561@emout03.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Solo Yasoor For Win 3.xx MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 20 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:00 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00618 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:44:59 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26711; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout10.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.25) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026698; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:08 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout10.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA05408; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:43 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000341_-1105461184@emout10.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Remote Desktop II Cracked MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 16 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:00 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00621 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:00 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26772; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout19.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.45) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026753; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:57 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout19.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA26022; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000430_-1138709311@emout19.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Pov-Ray v3.0B (c) Pov Team MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 20 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:00 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00626 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:00 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26830; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout11.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.26) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026804; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:05:35 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout11.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA21722; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000505_-1941704895@emout11.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Live Wire v.1 WinNT (Full) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 22 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:00 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00629 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:00 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26810; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout09.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.24) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026798; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:05:15 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout09.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA02502; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000444_509355180@emout09.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Orion Burger (c) Sanctuary Woods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 20 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:01 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00632 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:01 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26715; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout08.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.23) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026693; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:06 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout08.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA03596; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000335_-1239365312@emout08.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Uploads from o6/23/96~o6/29/96 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 16 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:01 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00635 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:01 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26790; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout03.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.94) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026721; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:37 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout03.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA14450; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000405_1424475968@emout03.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS ChemScape Chime for Win95 & WinNT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 18 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:02 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00638 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:01 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26736; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout16.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026702; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:19 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA14746; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000352_476080064@emout16.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Onside Soccer - German Language Files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 17 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:02 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00641 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:02 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26809; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout12.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.38) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026799; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:05:18 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout12.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA24414; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000418_-1975259456@emout12.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Screaming Skies Degger Rage II [5/6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 19 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:02 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00644 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:02 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26712; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout01.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.92) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026704; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:28 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout01.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA16881; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000401_1114894912@emout01.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS W4 Server v2.5a (c) Antelope Software MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 18 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:03 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00647 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:02 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26718; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout14.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.40) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026700; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:13 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout14.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA22337; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000347_207384619@emout14.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Onside Soccer - Spanish Language Files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 17 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:03 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00650 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:03 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26806; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout13.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.39) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026800; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:05:24 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout13.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA16055; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:57 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000449_918081985@emout13.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Drafix QuickCAD v4.0 Win95/WinNT [o2/o2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 21 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:03 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00653 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:03 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26708; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout12.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.38) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026701; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:16 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout12.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA23247; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000242_-1373459905@emout12.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Accent Express v2.0 (c) Accent Software MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 12 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:04 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00656 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:03 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26773; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout15.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.41) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026752; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:56 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout15.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA14192; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000422_-1641194515@emout15.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Packard Bell CBT April 96 Part 3 [o1/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 19 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:04 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00659 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:04 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26763; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout09.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.24) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026748; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:43 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout09.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA02212; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000414_1913802304@emout09.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Panzer General speech addon for Win95 [1/2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 18 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:04 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00662 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:04 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26838; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:06:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout02.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.93) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026834; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:06:13 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout02.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA17180; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:05:44 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000455_1612332609@emout02.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: ^v^ My'TiC ^v^ Ultimate Doom (c) Id Software *FiX* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 21 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:04 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00665 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:04 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26739; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout18.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.44) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026703; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:04:26 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout18.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA15281; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000357_719050816@emout18.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: $% .y/\/\ %$ [ AO-Insanity ( the BEST AO prog the MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 17 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From bsgreen@juno.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:05 1997 Return-Path: bsgreen@juno.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00668 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:04 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26867; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:08:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from x1.boston.juno.com(205.231.100.21) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026860; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:07:51 -0500 Received: (from bsgreen@juno.com) by x1.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id AnD04342; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:39 EST To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Internet Phone Charges--USA only Message-ID: <19970227.230155.3518.1.bsgreen@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 1.15 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 2-3,8-9,13-14,22-23,27-32 From: bsgreen@juno.com (Brian S Green) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:39 EST Content-Length: 1703 I strongly protest any proposed minute-by-minute charges for internet use. I do not accept the reasoning that internet use will hinder operation of the phone networks. A phone company only knows that a line is use. How can you possibly tell if someone isn't simply having a voice conversation for an hour or more? And how can you differentiate someone who may dial up a local BBS versus someone dialing up and connecting to a mainframe for work at home reasons versus someone dialing up and connecting to the Internet? You cannot simply attempt to single out internet users and penalize them for their use. Your net will will snare people who may be using their phone and/or their computer for non-Internet purposes. This is grossly unfair to everyone. In addition to being unfair to all phone customers, it is most likely to severly inhibit, interfere, or even stop completely the technological advances computers and the Internet provide. It will halt personal and commercial avenues for people. Those on fixed incomes will not be able to take advantage of these avenues. Small businesses without deep pockets will not be able to do business using the Internet. Only those companies and individuals with significant funds will be able to use it. This will make it available to only the elite, not the general public. I strongly protest this proposal. I do not believe it to be based on any legitimate reasons. I do not believe it can be enforced fairly. It's just another get-rich-quick scheme that is grossly unfair to the public and private sectors. -- Brian Green, Danvers IL bsgreen@juno.com (text only) bsgreen@hotmail.com (attachments) www.geocities.com/Heartland/Plains/6532 From rkemper@texas.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:05 1997 Return-Path: rkemper@texas.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00671 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:05 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26596; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail2.texas.net(207.207.0.140) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026588; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:38 -0500 Received: from rkemper.texas.net (pmnet02-31.austin.texas.net [207.207.2.31]) by mail2.texas.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA18554 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:02:14 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <3316674B.1092@texas.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:04:11 -0600 From: Randy Kemper Reply-To: rkemper@texas.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No 96-263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 526 Dear FCC: Please reject the request by Southwestern Bell to begin a per minute charge for internet access. We all pay our local telephone companies a flat rate each month to use our lines as allowed by law, whether it be for my teenage daughter to talk on the phone for hours or for internet access. This would be an unfair burden to the consumer and will undoubtedly destroy the fun we all have on the web. Thank you for your consideration, and please feel free to E-Mail me at rkemper@texas.net Thank you. Randy Kemper From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:05 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00674 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:05 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26439; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout08.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.23) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026429; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:00:47 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout08.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA01124; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000014_620555452@emout08.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: CaT KiLLeR Beta .9_ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 1 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:06 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00677 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:05 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26530; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout11.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.26) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026501; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:48 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout11.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA19008; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000119_752520253@emout11.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Evil Gate [o1/o1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 6 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:06 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00680 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:06 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26598; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout05.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.96) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026586; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:32 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout05.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA13002; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000205_379687998@emout05.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS pcAnywhere 7.5 32bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 9 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:06 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00683 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:06 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26435; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout02.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.93) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026427; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:00:36 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout02.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA13669; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000008_77593532@emout02.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: + Content-Length: 1353 {P; SKiTZoS NeWist FaC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 1 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:07 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00686 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:06 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26670; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout10.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.25) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026661; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:03:35 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout10.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA05076; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000307_1148567999@emout10.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Scene & Demoscene Pac MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 14 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:07 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00689 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:07 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26577; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout01.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.92) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026544; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:27 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout01.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA15383; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000201_44154558@emout01.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Lenny's Musictoons [1/1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 9 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:07 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00692 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:07 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26552; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout01.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.92) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026537; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:00 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout01.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA15012; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000132_1679767741@emout01.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS NHL POWERPLAY (o2/o3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 7 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:08 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00695 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:07 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26549; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout18.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.44) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026527; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:57 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout18.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA13532; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000128_1424475965@emout18.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS NHL POWERPLAY (o2/o3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 7 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:08 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00698 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:08 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26469; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout15.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.41) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026452; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:00:58 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout15.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA10700; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235955_-1373459908@emout15.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS DirecPC v1.3 for Win95 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 0 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:08 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00701 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:08 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26512; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout16.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026497; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:38 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA12187; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000100_-1239365315@emout16.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: -=OmNi=- Norton Utilities 95 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 5 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:09 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00704 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:08 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26487; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout01.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.92) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026455; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:09 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout01.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA14407; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000041_1913802300@emout01.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Doggy Style v2.0 for mIRC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 3 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:09 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00707 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:09 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26672; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout02.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.93) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026665; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:03:48 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout02.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA16039; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000322_-2076204629@emout02.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS King Men (c) Horng Shen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 15 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:09 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00710 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:09 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26395; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout16.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026388; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:59:41 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA10848; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235916_685503931@emout16.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Doggy Style v2.0 for mIRC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 98 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:09 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00713 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:09 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26433; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout19.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.45) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026426; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:00:30 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout19.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA22168; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000000_-1105461188@emout19.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Space Hulk 2 (c) EA [2/5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 0 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:10 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00716 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:09 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26418; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout13.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.39) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026412; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:00:21 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout13.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA12610; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235949_-1607708573@emout13.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Netscape Mail Server 2.0b MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 0 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:10 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00719 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:10 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26489; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout07.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.22) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026456; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:14 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout07.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA21839; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000046_-2042367300@emout07.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Doggy Style v2.0 for mIRC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 4 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:10 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00722 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:10 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26462; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout18.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.44) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026454; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:06 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout18.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA12884; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000035_1612332604@emout18.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: $% .y/\/\ %$ [Tons of VBX's] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 3 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:11 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00725 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:10 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26622; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout20.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.46) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026593; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:52 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout20.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA26967; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000223_1549019070@emout20.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Manufacturing Manager 1.0b MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 11 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:11 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00728 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:11 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26571; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout05.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.96) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026540; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:09 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout05.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA12709; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:43 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000142_2028312253@emout05.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Telnet32 for Qmodem Pro 2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 8 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:11 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00731 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:11 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26680; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout16.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026664; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:03:44 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA14339; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000317_1746873919@emout16.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Cyber Passage Beta 3 [1/1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 15 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:12 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00734 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:11 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26508; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout01.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.92) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026496; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:35 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout01.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA14696; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000105_-870777155@emout01.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Telnet32 for Qmodem Pro 2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 5 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:12 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00737 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:12 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26532; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout14.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.40) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026502; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:50 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout14.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA20559; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000124_1081496893@emout14.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Panzer General (c) SSi [2/2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 7 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:12 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00740 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:12 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26437; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout01.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.92) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026428; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:00:39 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout01.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA13987; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000003_-937788228@emout01.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS MechWarrior 2:NetMech [o3/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 1 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:13 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00743 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:12 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26555; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout02.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.93) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026538; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:04 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout02.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA14735; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000137_1813140797@emout02.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS MechWarrior 2:NetMech [o2/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 7 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:13 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00746 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:13 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26646; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout18.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.44) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026635; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:03:26 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout18.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA14599; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000252_106742314@emout18.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Quake Joystick Support Driver MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 13 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:13 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00749 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:13 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26399; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout13.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.39) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026389; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:59:43 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout13.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA12184; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235911_509355174@emout13.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS SUy27 Flanker for DOS (c) SSI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 91 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:13 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00752 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:13 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26624; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout17.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.43) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026545; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:27 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout17.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA05435; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000156_-1105461186@emout17.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Ultimate Doom for Win95 [1/3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 9 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:14 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00755 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:13 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26506; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout11.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.26) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026475; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:24 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout11.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA18757; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000055_-1540949020@emout11.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS SUy27 Flanker for DOS (c) SSI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 5 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:14 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00758 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:14 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26365; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout17.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.43) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026352; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:59:02 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout17.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA03013; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235835_918081978@emout17.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS MEDIADEVELOPER OLE CONTROLS 2.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 45 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:14 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00761 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:14 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26391; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout19.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.45) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026379; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:59:24 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout19.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA21446; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235856_-1875854043@emout19.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Aeco ZipExplorer Pro v2 Win95 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 72 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:15 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00764 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:14 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26602; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout09.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.24) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026587; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:36 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout09.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA00777; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000210_620555454@emout09.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Sophos Sweep July Edition Win95 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 10 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:15 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00767 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:15 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26466; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout13.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.39) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026451; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:00:57 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout13.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA13076; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000021_951637436@emout13.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Orion Burger (c) Sanctuary Woods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 2 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:15 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00770 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:15 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26600; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout03.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.94) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026594; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:56 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout03.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA13316; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000228_1813140798@emout03.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Sophos Sweep July Edition Win95 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 11 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:16 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00773 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:15 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26504; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout09.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.24) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026500; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:44 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout09.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA29976; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000115_584867389@emout09.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Space Hulk 2 *Sound Addon* [o2/o5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 6 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:16 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00776 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:16 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26485; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout17.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.43) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026453; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:01 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout17.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA04449; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000030_1450011324@emout17.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Netmanage Chameleon v4.6.3 (o1/o1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 3 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:16 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00779 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:16 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26460; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout16.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026450; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:00:56 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA11725; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000026_1114894908@emout16.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Space Hulk 2 *CINEMA ADDON* [o3/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 3 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:17 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00782 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:16 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26676; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout15.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.41) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026662; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:03:38 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout15.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA13120; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000246_-1071908161@emout15.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS ChemScape Chime for Win95 & WinNT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 12 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:17 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00785 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:17 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26369; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout06.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.97) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026353; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:59:11 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout06.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA24932; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235845_1515459386@emout06.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS NHL PowerPlay 96 for Win95 [o2/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 62 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:17 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00788 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:17 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26366; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout13.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.39) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026339; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:58:57 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout13.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA11618; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235827_446451898@emout13.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Space Hulk 2 *CINEMA ADDON* [o3/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 38 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:18 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00791 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:17 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26678; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout14.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.40) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026663; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:03:39 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout14.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA21895; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000312_1481906495@emout14.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: << ----f0q XyZ q0f --- >> XyZ MaSS MaiLeR MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 14 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:18 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00794 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:18 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26370; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout04.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.95) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026354; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:59:13 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout04.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA26942; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235840_1424475962@emout04.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Screaming Skies Degger Rage II [2/6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 54 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:18 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00797 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:18 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26372; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout13.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.39) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026357; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:59:19 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout13.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA11889; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235850_1947357114@emout13.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Level 5 Quest Database Server [o1/o1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 66 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:18 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00800 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:18 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26648; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout06.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.97) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026636; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:03:32 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout06.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA27964; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000302_719050815@emout06.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS FPS Baseball HIGH END Audio (o1/o3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 13 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:19 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00803 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:19 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26605; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout14.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.40) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026591; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:44 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout14.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA21227; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000214_951637438@emout14.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Accent Express v2.0 (c) Accent Software MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 10 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:19 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00806 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:19 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26397; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout07.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.22) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026387; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:59:33 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout07.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA20711; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235905_-1004796101@emout07.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Win/NT 4.0 Release Candidate1 [o1/o2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 86 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:19 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00809 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:19 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26620; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout16.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026592; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:47 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA13062; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000218_1181978942@emout16.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS FPS Baseball HIGH END Audio (o2/o3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 10 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:20 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00812 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:20 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26644; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout03.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.94) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026634; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:03:26 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout03.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA13620; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000257_413239743@emout03.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Packard Bell CBT April 96 Part 3 [o3/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 13 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:20 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00815 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:20 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26547; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout08.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.23) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026543; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:24 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout08.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA02313; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000146_-1941704899@emout08.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Accent Express v2.0 (c) Accent Software MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 8 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:20 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00818 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:20 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26641; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout08.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.23) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026633; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:03:09 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout08.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA02922; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000238_-1741655511@emout08.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS FPS Baseball HIGH END Audio (o2/o3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 12 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:21 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00821 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:20 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26642; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout05.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.96) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026632; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:03:05 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout05.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA13361; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000234_-2076204630@emout05.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: [!CdZ!] Indycar Racing 2 Win95 Missing Disk #10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 11 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:21 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00824 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:21 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26575; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:02:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout13.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.39) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026542; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:02:19 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout13.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA14097; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000152_-1306477378@emout13.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: ^v^ My'TiC ^v^ Final Doom (c) id Software (o2/o3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 8 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:21 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00827 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:21 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26393; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout04.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.95) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026384; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:59:28 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout04.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA27213; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235900_-1406891717@emout04.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: ^v^ My'TiC ^v^ Final Doom (c) id Software (o1/o3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 79 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:22 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00830 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:21 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26464; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout10.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.25) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026457; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:19 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout10.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA03436; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000050_-1741655513@emout10.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS BoundsChecker Professional Edition for WinNT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 4 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:22 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00833 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:22 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26511; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout05.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.96) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026499; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:01:39 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout05.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA12356; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:01:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000110_379687997@emout05.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS FateFul Lightning: Civil War Narrative (o1/o4) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 6 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:23 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00836 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:22 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26674; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout03.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.94) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026666; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:03:56 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout03.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA13952; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000326_-1808744918@emout03.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS FateFul Lightning: Civil War Narrative (o2/o4) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 15 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:23 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00839 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:23 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id AAA26695; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:04:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout05.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.96) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026667; Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:03:57 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout05.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id AAA14009; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:03:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970228000331_-1574158873@emout05.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Windows 95 OEM SR2 Beta 3 (Build 1068) [o3/o5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 16 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From JRPHOENIX@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:23 1997 Return-Path: JRPHOENIX@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00842 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:23 -0500 From: JRPHOENIX@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26258; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout17.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.43) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026251; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:53:45 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout17.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA28905 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235319_-1540950298@emout17.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Profit? What Profit Content-Length: 218 Gentlemen and Ladies, The only reason for this "appeal" Is to correct the phone companies own short sightedness in their underestimation of how well the internet would take off...... DO NOT GIVE THEM WHAT THEY ASK! From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:24 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00845 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:23 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26271; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:54:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026267; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:54:37 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id UAA27942 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:54:14 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:54:14 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702280454.UAA27942@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: rstrader@pacbell.net Subject: Form Data from 207.105.202.83 Content-Length: 574 Date: Thu Feb 27 20:54:14 PST 1997 address = 413 Broadway city = Costa Mesa comments = email = rstrader@pacbell.net name = Robert G. Strader regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = CA statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 92627-2318 From Xiamak@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:24 1997 Return-Path: Xiamak@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00848 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:24 -0500 From: Xiamak@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26296; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:57:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout14.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.40) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026293; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:57:39 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout14.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA17587 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:57:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:57:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235717_1215696349@emout14.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO to fees for Internet Access Content-Length: 734 Two steps forward one step back!! Where does anyone get off to regulate the Internet? Haven't you and other government agencies done enough damage? The politicians in this country are "closet dictators"! Constantly telling the rest of us how to live. The white straight anglo male has shoved and rammed down their opinion and boring coventional life style down our throats for centuries. Are they ever going to stop? Why do schools and the Internet have to watch over children not to access pornographic material? What are their unfit-fornicating-socially-retarded parents doing? Obviously in the bedroom fornicating!! And now some capitalist greedy fat rich executives want a piece of the Internet. Charging fees my ass. From swilliam@seidata.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:24 1997 Return-Path: swilliam@seidata.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00851 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:24 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26283; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:56:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns1.seidata.com(206.160.242.33) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026281; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:56:13 -0500 Received: from NEC (sunman-7.seidata.com [206.160.243.136]) by seidata.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA01382 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:55:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <33169048.3A1B@seidata.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:59:04 -0800 From: Steve Williamson Organization: SEI Data X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02E-KIT (Win95; U; 16bit) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: [Fwd: CC Docket No. 96-263] Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Length: 1101 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 Message-ID: <3316441E.4DE1@seidata.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:34:06 -0800 From: Steve Williamson Organization: SEI Data X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02E-KIT (Win95; U; 16bit) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ISP@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear FCC; This letter is to protest the proposed additional per minute charges requested by the telephone companies. It is our belief that Internet usage will diminish if users were required to pay additional per minute charges. Your agency is supposed to protect the consumers not the telephone company. It could hurt or destroy many small business' as well as deprive children in schools of their access to Internet resources and interactive projects. It will hurt all Americans. The only beneficiaries would be the telephone companies. Thank you for your consideration of this letter while making your decision. Steve & Lisa Williamson P.O. Box 57 212 Vine Street Sunman, Indiana 47041 (812)623-2639 swilliam@seidata.com From vernalsl@juno.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:25 1997 Return-Path: vernalsl@juno.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00854 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:25 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26278; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:55:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from m1.boston.juno.com(205.231.100.199) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026276; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:55:03 -0500 Received: (from vernalsl@juno.com) by m1.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id XyJ09720; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:09 EST To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Comment on proposed rule (internet telephone charges) Message-ID: <19970227.205126.13150.0.vernalsl@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 1.15 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 1-2,5-6,14-15,19-20,24-28 From: vernalsl@juno.com (Samuel L. Vernallis) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:09 EST Content-Length: 1326 Regret this may be after your closing date. Just learned of the address to which to send comment. I most strongly oppose the imposition of time charges on local access to internet nodes. The telephone companies collect enough from me as it is. I have a second line, just for internet and fax. The telephone company (GTE in this case) offers me a choice: I can pay a low monthly basic fee, and then so much per minute. Or I can pay a much higher fixed fee and have unlimited access to the lines. I chose the latter. If they goofed on how much that fixed fee should be, that's their problem, and they should request a tariff increase from the PUC. It's bad enough that the banks are charging access fees to ATM machines, after they fired all the tellers to save money and push everyone to the machines. As soon as the cable is finished in the street in front of my house, I'll switch from telephone to a much faster, cleaner and more efficient method of accessing the internet. Until then, it's wrong for the telephone companies to expect to collect more. I'm sending this via a company called JUNO. They offer FREE email. All I have to do is let the advertisements scroll past the screen whilst I read or compose mail. I don't hear them complaining about having too many customers. fwiw Samuel L. Vernallis From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:25 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00857 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:25 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26259; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout15.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.41) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026250; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:53:36 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout15.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA03869; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235237_1181978932@emout15.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS MechWarrior 2:NetMech [o1/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1111 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:25 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00860 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:25 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26313; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout09.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.24) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026303; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:58:23 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout09.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA27557; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:57:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:57:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235755_2061865401@emout09.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Lost In The City MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 1 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:26 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00863 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:26 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26312; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout13.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.39) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026305; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:58:30 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout13.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA11302; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:04 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235803_-1775195356@emout13.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: Microsoft's Windows 3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 13 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:26 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00866 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:26 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26335; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout07.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.22) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026309; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:58:49 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout07.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA20220; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:23 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235822_77593530@emout07.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: =(LXIX)= ViSuaL BaSiC 3.0 PRo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 32 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:26 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00869 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:26 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26318; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout18.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.44) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026307; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:58:40 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout18.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA11111; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235812_-1473997511@emout18.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Telnet32 for Qmodem Pro 2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 22 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:27 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00872 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:26 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26321; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout03.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.94) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026308; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:58:44 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout03.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA10363; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235817_-1038353734@emout03.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Uploads from o6/23/96~o6/29/96 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 27 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:27 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00875 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:27 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26315; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout11.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.26) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026304; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:58:32 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout11.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA16421; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235800_-1975259463@emout11.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS The UPSS MM Bot _eta 2 _y XaOS MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 9 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:27 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00878 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:27 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26319; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout16.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026306; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:58:34 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA09926; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:58:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235808_-1641194522@emout16.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS LightWave 5.0 Final (Rev. C) 100% RiP [o2/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1219 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 17 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:28 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00881 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:27 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26209; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:51:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026205; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:51:36 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id UAA27036 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:51:09 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:51:09 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702280451.UAA27036@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: drkcloud@annex.com Subject: Form Data from 204.74.67.139 Content-Length: 561 Date: Thu Feb 27 20:51:09 PST 1997 = 19997 Ruston Rd. city = Woodland Hills comments = email = drkcloud@annex.com name = Bill Reiss regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = CA statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 91364 From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:28 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00884 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:28 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26230; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout06.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.97) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026224; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:52:53 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout06.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA20505; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:52:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:52:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235226_509355167@emout06.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS MechWarrior 2:NetMech [o1/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1111 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:28 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00887 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:28 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26234; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout10.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.25) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026226; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:53:07 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout10.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA27553; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:52:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:52:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235232_884532276@emout10.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS MechWarrior 2:NetMech [o1/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1111 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:29 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00890 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:28 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26236; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout20.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.46) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026227; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:53:10 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout20.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA20024; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:52:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:52:43 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235241_1679767732@emout20.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS MechWarrior 2:NetMech [o1/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1111 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:29 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00893 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:29 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26238; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout02.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.93) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026228; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:53:14 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout02.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA08480; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:52:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:52:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235246_2061865396@emout02.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS MechWarrior 2:NetMech [o1/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1111 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:29 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00896 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:29 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26232; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:53:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout15.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.41) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026225; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:53:05 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout15.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA03357; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:52:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:52:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235206_-1406891724@emout15.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS MechWarrior 2:NetMech [o1/o3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1111 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From Hollfam@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:30 1997 Return-Path: Hollfam@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00899 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:29 -0500 From: Hollfam@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26216; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:52:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout16.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026214; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:52:07 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA05051; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:51:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:51:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227235141_1215699251@emout16.mail.aol.com> To: NRodrig269@aol.com, LWebb24@aol.com, LazyH2@aol.com, SweetErn@aol.com, UTROTC@aol.com, CoBrAxOTC@aol.com, lswinney@3-cities.com, quanying@netscape.com, mccona@3-cities.com, pdbkhoo@televar.com, isp@fcc.gov, mr_weimar@pnl.gov Subject: UPS Uploads from o6/23/96~o6/29/96 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 1218 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = =A0=A0=A0=AB=8B- -=96|[=A4 Fate X 2.5 Mail Bomb =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB =A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0 =AB=8B- -=96|= [=A4 1 % Done =A4]|=96-- -=9B=BB _____________ __________ _________________ _____________ l \=3D- ______\l\=3D- __ \_ l\=3D- = - \ l \ - ______\ l=3D \=3D- \_____ ll \ =3D- \ \_ \__ l- \_____ =3D- = ____\ l=3D-\=3D- \_____ l \=3D- \=3D- ____\ \ \ =3D- \___\- \\ l_____l \- = \___ l \ \=3D- ____\ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \ - ____ \ \- \=3D-= \ \- \=3D- \ ___l \ \=3D- \__ \ \=3D- \ _ - l\=3D- \_ \=3D= -\=3D- \ \ \- \_ \- \ ______\ \ \_____\__l- \_____\ \- \_____\ \=3D- \ ___________\ =20 \ l=3D- l \ l =3D- l \ l =3D- l = \ l=3D- l \ l=3D- l \ l_______l \l_____l \l_____l \l______l \ l___________ l From TINMANII@prodigy.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:30 1997 Return-Path: TINMANII@prodigy.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00902 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:30 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26088; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:42:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail1y-ext.prodigy.net(198.83.19.113) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026086; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:42:34 -0500 Received: from rjiredff (port85.phnx.prodigy.net [204.237.66.85]) by mail1y-int.prodigy.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA49518 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:42:10 -0500 Message-ID: <33166234.11E3@prodigy.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:42:28 -0700 From: TINMANII Reply-To: TINMANII@prodigy.net Organization: Prodigy Internet X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ISP@FCC.GOV Subject: EMAIL/INTERNET CHARGES Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 821 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: 1 the consumer does not need to be charged for using internet service on the phonelines. 2 the responsibility of maintaing phone lines is just that; the phone companies. the cost of updating aned replacing lines is a cost of doing business. as technology exists they are already behind the times and it will be some time before the upgraded computers will be able to take advantage of the hardware that exists in their computer terminals today because of outdated phone technology. the phone companies will pass additional costs on to the consumer anyway or find other ways to cut into the overwelming growth in internet use and sales., i'm sure 2 consumers currently pay for phone service and internet service, they don't need to pay for something additional that they already pay for. From HKoritz@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:30 1997 Return-Path: HKoritz@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00905 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:30 -0500 From: HKoritz@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26034; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:37:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout06.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.97) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026025; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:37:41 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout06.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA09095 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:37:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:37:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227233714_1050789228@emout06.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Fwd: Unwarranted Rate Increases Content-Length: 1073 --------------------- Forwarded message: Subj: Unwarranted Rate Increases Date: 97-02-10 11:38:48 EST From: ActorAce To: HKoritz,Megabuk156,MALAIKA27 I am writing you this to inform you of a very important matter currently under review by the FCC. Your local telephone company has filed a proposal with the FCC to impose per minute charges for your internet service. They contend that your usage has or will hinder the operation of the telephone network. It is my belief that internet usage will diminish if users were required to pay additional per minute charges. The FCC has created an email box for your comments, responses must be received by February 13, 1997. Send your comments to isp@fcc.gov and tell them what you think. Every phone company is in on this one, and they are trying to sneak it in just under the wire for litiagation. Let everyone you know here this one. Get the e-mail address to everyone you can think of. isp@fcc.gov Please forward this email to all your friends on the internet so all our voices may be heard! From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:30 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00908 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:30 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA26008; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:36:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma026002; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:36:18 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id UAA22217 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:35:55 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:35:55 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702280435.UAA22217@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: chickchickwow@geocities.com Subject: Form Data from 206.154.246.14 Content-Length: 577 Date: Thu Feb 27 20:35:55 PST 1997 address = 8103 Valley Bend city = Huntsville comments = email = chickchickwow@geocities.com name = Annie Bosworth regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = AL statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 35802 From bretr@flash.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:31 1997 Return-Path: box@flash.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00911 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:30 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25918; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:28:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from centurion.flash.net(206.149.24.19) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025914; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:28:34 -0500 Received: (from box@localhost) by flash.net (8.8.5/8.7.5) id WAA16865; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:28:53 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199702280428.WAA16865@flash.net> From: Craig Rasmussen To: isp@fcc.gov Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:28:39 -0600 Subject: CCDocket No 96-263 cc: bretr@flash.net Content-Length: 465 To whom it may concern: As an avid user of the Internet, I feel the proposal to charge a per minute charge to internet users is absurd. Whoever the company was that proposed this, is obviously doing it with greed and money in mind. Having access to the Internet opens many new windows. The whole world is "connected" because of the Internet. Please don't allow us to become disconnected, because of the fees incurred by the telephone company. The Rasmussens From HKMK10A@prodigy.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:31 1997 Return-Path: HKMK10A@prodigy.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00914 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:31 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25961; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:31:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from pimaia2y.prodigy.com(198.83.18.95) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025959; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:31:44 -0500 Received: from mime2.prodigy.com (mime2.prodigy.com [192.168.253.26]) by pimaia2y.prodigy.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAB11470 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:52:26 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by mime2.prodigy.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id WAA104192 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:41:06 -0500 Message-Id: <199702280341.WAA104192@mime2.prodigy.com> X-Mailer: Prodigy Internet GW(v0.9beta) - ae01dm04sc03 From: HKMK10A@prodigy.com (MR ARTHUR M GOLDFARB) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:41:06, -0500 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Regional Telephone Co.'s & Internet Content-Length: 630 Gentlemen: I understand that the "Baby Bells" want to cash in on users of the Internet, by adding a surcharge for usage. The idea is preposterous, regardless of any claims that telephone line capacity is being strained. I hope you will not patronize any such proposals from the regional telephone line providers. If they want to profit from Internet usage, let them provide their own competitive gateway service, and participate that way. Add telephone line capacity if needed. If they cannot provide the capacity, let others compete. Let's stay with competitive and free enterprise please. No federally approved surcharges. From Terra220@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:31 1997 Return-Path: Terra220@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00917 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:31 -0500 From: Terra220@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25950; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:31:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout12.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.38) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025945; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:30:51 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout12.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA23146 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:30:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:30:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227232146_1017253166@emout12.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: charges Content-Length: 1155 To whom it may concern, I was recently informed that the phone companies were thinking about charging On-line users additional minute charges for On-line use. This idea seems obserd to me. I only go On-line to check my mail and do my reacerch reports. If there will be an additional charge added to my time then I will most probably no longer be able to afford my On-line server, or any other for that matter. I realize that I am only one person, however, I believe a lot of people feel this way. If there are going to be additional charges then it will limit the number of people able to use the internet. I see the benifits of this, but what about the people who need acess. Discluding work orientated use, there are a lot of people who cannot talk one-on- one face-to-face with people. Chat rooms provide an escape from that anxitey. There is much to be learned from the Internet fror people who don't have a lot of money. I do not belive it is a good idea to charge additionaly for use. Sincerly, Terra Wright From bshadow@centuryinter.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:32 1997 Return-Path: bshadow@centuryinter.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00920 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:32 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25932; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:29:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from www.pc.centuryinter.net(206.65.177.250) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025929; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:28:50 -0500 Received: from anxp12.pc.centuryinter.net by host.pc.centuryinter.net; (5.65/1.1.8.2/16Aug95-0520PM) id AA09880; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:28:26 -0500 Message-Id: <9702280428.AA09880@host.pc.centuryinter.net> From: "Karen" To: Subject: Phone Companies charging for Internet usage Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:25:23 -0600 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1227 I would like to voice my opinion regarding the phone companies charging per minute fees for Internet usage. First of all my phone company is my Internet provider and I already pay them a fee for the use. If they are allowed to charge per minute on top of that they would sure be making a nice little fee. Second, the Internet should be left free for everyone. It is bringing the world closer together. I know of no other way that my son would have met a friend in Australia. He is learning about other countries right from the source. What better way is there to get an education. If the prices go up and are charged by the minute I will have to drop the service. Most people I know will also have to drop it because it will no longer be affordable. This would be like turning it over to only people with money. Third, what would this do to all the schools and business that use it. Schools are using it to teach children and I doubt they could afford the extra costs. There are a lot of small businesses that use it to advertise. This proposal would effectively put an end to something that could bring the whole world closer together. Karen Beard 237 W. Huron Omer, MI 48749 bshadow@centuryinter.net From brodhow@flash.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:33 1997 Return-Path: brodhow@flash.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00923 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:32 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25883; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:24:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from endeavor.flash.net(208.194.223.40) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025881; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:24:29 -0500 Received: from tc4-181.flash.net (tc4-181.flash.net [207.181.195.181]) by endeavor (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA05740 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:21:13 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <3317CAB5.4189@flash.net> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:20:37 -0800 From: Howard Brodale Organization: We Are A Family X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No 96-263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1586 Though the deadline of Feb. 13, 1997 is past for this comment; I would still like to express one. My email was disabled for over a month. Dance with the ones who brought you this far. Things were fine when profits were high from the same ones who now want a different return for the millions the phone services have reaped. It is understandable that incurred higher costs should justify higher service charges. But why make it a tax on the users that will drive many away. AOL learned that charging by the minute, or by any other means, became a losing idea. Think of the businesses that have reaped manifold profits since advertising on the Internet. They are the ones to gain the most and who share a little of their profits to help you out. The average user does not stay on 24 hours a day. VP Gore would be so disappointed if some kids would be cut off from the info super highway. Netscape, Intel, and Microsoft might have a thing to say since they are staking their entire futures on the Internet, along with many others. Businesses and the government have a bigger, vested interest in the phone services. They are the ones envisioning and encouraging everyone to connect. The phone services will have to keep up or someone else will take their place. All the powerful entities mentioned above will ensure their profits being generated from all those users. This user tax will be a threat to them: WATCH OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ask them to ensure their visions... Sincerely Yours, In Christ, Howard Brodale From shaury@impulse.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:33 1997 Return-Path: shaury@impulse.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00926 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:33 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25802; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:17:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from impulse.net(204.188.6.10) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025799; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:17:22 -0500 Received: from default (pm-lo-7.terminus.com [204.182.12.231]) by impulse.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA17754 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:35:19 -0800 Message-Id: <199702280135.RAA17754@impulse.net> From: "Susan Haury" To: Subject: FCC Billing Plans for Net Use Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:45:08 -0800 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 620 To Whom It May Concern, We received an e-mail message today in regard to subject, and we are very upset at the prospect of paying, yet even, more fees for internet use. Our phones companies already charge substantial monthly fees for a variety of services, taxes, etc. We had the option of a flat monthly rate or a basic rate with a per call charge. We chose the flat monthly rate at a higher cost. We sincerely hope this does not pass and that you please listen to the public opinion. I'm sure it is by far against this telephone company proposal. Thanks for taking the time to read our comments. Tom and Susan From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:33 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00929 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:33 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25856; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:20:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025853; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:20:20 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id UAA17235 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:19:57 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:19:57 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702280419.UAA17235@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: SHoush@worldnet.att.net Subject: Form Data from 207.146.224.111 Content-Length: 761 Date: Thu Feb 27 20:19:57 PST 1997 address = 355 Osborne Street city = Vista, comments = I don't think the FCC should let the Telephone companies charge for time spent on the Internet. Our cost is high enough for just toll calls and long distance calls. Enough is enough!!!! email = SHoush@worldnet.att.net name = Shirley A. Housh regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = CA statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 92084 From jaevans1@flash.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:34 1997 Return-Path: jaevans1@flash.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00932 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:33 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25814; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:18:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from centurion.flash.net(206.149.24.19) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025810; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:18:04 -0500 Received: (from jaevans1@localhost) by flash.net (8.8.5/8.7.5) id WAA05565; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:18:23 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199702280418.WAA05565@flash.net> From: "Janet A. Evans" To: isp@fcc.gov Date: Fri, 04 Jan 1980 10:30:10 -0500 Subject: "CC Docket No 96-263" Content-Length: 1480 From: Janet A. Evans 28418 W. 8 Mile Farmington Hills, MI. 48336 e-mail address: jaevans1@flash.net or: janet.evans@juno.com Dear Sirs: I am writing you to protest your proposal which would suddenly charge me on a per-minute basis for use of the internet. I am a brand new subscriber and have waited several years to be able to even afford a new computer which would have a modem and enough power to access the internet. Also, I just paid a one year fee to my server and it is non-refundable. What a great disappointment if I never even truly learn how to use the net and also lose my money to the server just because the phone company is quite greedy. I will cancel at the time I am forced to pay on a per minute basis! I live only 7 miles from a good friend here in the Detroit area and I pay an average of $50.00 per month just to talk to this one person. The local phone company is already robbing me and I have tried everything to find a way to decrease this outrageous cost to no avail. Please do not bow to the pressure of this company and their supposed need for such handsome profits. Also, I know this message was to have been sent to you by Feb. 13, but I was not connected to the net on that date, so was unable to send it prior to today. Thank you very much for reading my e-mail. I am still hopeful that I will be able to use the Internet in the future at no per minute charge. Please write back soon. From jaevans1@flash.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:34 1997 Return-Path: jaevans1@flash.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00935 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:34 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25825; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:18:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from centurion.flash.net(206.149.24.19) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025820; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:18:21 -0500 Received: (from jaevans1@localhost) by flash.net (8.8.5/8.7.5) id WAA05827; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:18:40 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199702280418.WAA05827@flash.net> From: "Janet A. Evans" To: isp@fcc.gov Date: Fri, 04 Jan 1980 10:23:02 -0500 Subject: "CC Docket No 96-263 x-IntergoDate: 19800104102302 x-DeleteDate: 19800104 Content-Length: 1479 From: Janet A. Evans 28418 W. 8 Mile Farmington Hills, MI. 48336 e-mail address: jaevans1@flash.net or: janet.evans@juno.com Dear Sirs: I am writing you to protest your proposal which would suddenly charge me on a per-minute basis for use of the internet. I am a brand new subscriber and have waited several years to be able to even afford a new computer which would have a modem and enough power to access the internet. Also, I just paid a one year fee to my server and it is non-refundable. What a great disappointment if I never even truly learn how to use the net and also lose my money to the server just because the phone company is quite greedy. I will cancel at the time I am forced to pay on a per minute basis! I live only 7 miles from a good friend here in the Detroit area and I pay an average of $50.00 per month just to talk to this one person. The local phone company is already robbing me and I have tried everything to find a way to decrease this outrageous cost to no avail. Please do not bow to the pressure of this company and their supposed need for such handsome profits. Also, I know this message was to have been sent to you by Feb. 13, but I was not connected to the net on that date, so was unable to send it prior to today. Thank you very much for reading my e-mail. I am still hopeful that I will be able to use the Internet in the future at no per minute charge. Please write back soon. From jaevans1@flash.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:34 1997 Return-Path: jaevans1@flash.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00938 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:34 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25823; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:18:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from centurion.flash.net(206.149.24.19) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025819; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:18:18 -0500 Received: (from jaevans1@localhost) by flash.net (8.8.5/8.7.5) id WAA05759; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:18:37 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199702280418.WAA05759@flash.net> From: "Janet A. Evans" To: isp@fcc.gov Date: Fri, 04 Jan 1980 10:26:23 -0500 Subject: "CC Docket No 96-263" x-IntergoDate: 19800104102623 x-DeleteDate: 19800104 Content-Length: 1479 From: Janet A. Evans 28418 W. 8 Mile Farmington Hills, MI. 48336 e-mail address: jaevans1@flash.net or: janet.evans@juno.com Dear Sirs: I am writing you to protest your proposal which would suddenly charge me on a per-minute basis for use of the internet. I am a brand new subscriber and have waited several years to be able to even afford a new computer which would have a modem and enough power to access the internet. Also, I just paid a one year fee to my server and it is non-refundable. What a great disappointment if I never even truly learn how to use the net and also lose my money to the server just because the phone company is quite greedy. I will cancel at the time I am forced to pay on a per minute basis! I live only 7 miles from a good friend here in the Detroit area and I pay an average of $50.00 per month just to talk to this one person. The local phone company is already robbing me and I have tried everything to find a way to decrease this outrageous cost to no avail. Please do not bow to the pressure of this company and their supposed need for such handsome profits. Also, I know this message was to have been sent to you by Feb. 13, but I was not connected to the net on that date, so was unable to send it prior to today. Thank you very much for reading my e-mail. I am still hopeful that I will be able to use the Internet in the future at no per minute charge. Please write back soon. From jtw4894@ritvax.isc.rit.edu Fri Feb 28 11:45:35 1997 Return-Path: jtw4894@ritvax.isc.rit.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00941 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:34 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25858; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:20:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from vms1.isc.rit.edu(129.21.3.8) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025854; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:20:21 -0500 Received: from jtw4894 by ritvax.isc.rit.edu (PMDF V5.1-7 #14499) with SMTP id <01IFXFA3ULW49I46BA@ritvax.isc.rit.edu> for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:19:51 EST Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:27:15 -0500 From: JT Woolery Subject: Telephone Co. Internet charges To: isp@fcc.gov Message-id: <33165EA3.2A3A@rit.edu> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1415 I have just been made aware that local phone companies have filed a proposal with the FCC to impose per minute charges for internet service. This is very disturbing to internet users everywhere as this will make the internet unaffordable. I am an Electrical Engineering student and an RF technician and I rely on the internet everyday to do research, contact vendors, retrieve technical information, stay in touch with friends and family, read assignments written by professors, and just for fun. The hours I spend on the internet are enormous as well as important. The phone company need not worry about not being able to get me to spend more on them as I've been giving them plenty of business for years. The past two years I've been experiencing less than adequate service from the phone company. I've had to call them three times for repairs which took them days to respond to and two visits to fix on two separate occasions. There are two other tenants in this house with similar problems. There's so much noise and static on my line that there are nights I can't get connected to the internet! To have them charge me for services not rendered is adding insult to injury. Please don't allow this to happen! I will be notifying other students, friends, professors, and engineers of what I've learned and you will probably hear the same sentiments from them. Sincerely, JT Woolery From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:35 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00944 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:35 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25763; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:13:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025761; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:13:21 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id UAA14989 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:12:57 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:12:57 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702280412.UAA14989@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: monolink@earthlink.net Subject: Form Data from 206.250.112.164 Content-Length: 564 Date: Thu Feb 27 20:12:57 PST 1997 address = P.O. Box 4014 city = Lakewood comments = email = monolink@earthlink.net name = Russ Miller regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = CA statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 90711 From hwaltzer@flash.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:35 1997 Return-Path: hwaltzer@flash.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00947 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:35 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25738; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:11:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from endeavor.flash.net(208.194.223.40) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025732; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:11:02 -0500 Received: from john (ipm2-72.flash.net [208.194.205.72]) by endeavor (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA00090 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:07:42 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <330D2009.2DB8@flash.net> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 22:09:45 -0600 From: John Harris Organization: Harris Enterprises X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01KIT (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Per Minute Charges for Telephone Usage Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1002 A resource which is essentially free will be over subscribed. This is a trueism in the case of Internet connectivity. Suppliers of Internet connectivity often charge by the minute for connectivity because they know it will help meter resource usage. The telephone company has alway maintained a sufficient surplus of capacity to avoid periods during the day when users might encounter over subscribed resources and get a busy signal. Internet users tend to overuse the telephone resouces by keeping them tied up for hours on end. I am in favor of charging for all telephone useage by the minute. If I don't use it, I don't want to be charged for it as I am today by my telephone supplier. I do not wish to subsidize other telephone subscribers and I certainly do not wish to get a busy signal when I wish to make a telephone call. Please record my vote in favor of usage charges for all telephone use, not just Internet. John W. Harris, Jr. 664 Springhill Dr. Hurst, Tx. 76054 From smith3@digitalwebsat.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:36 1997 Return-Path: smith3@digitalwebsat.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00950 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:35 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25743; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:12:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(207.238.82.11) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025741; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:12:01 -0500 Received: from mail1.digitalwebsat.com by mail1.digitalwebsat.com (NTMail 3.02.10) with ESMTP id ra001603 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:09:18 +0000 Message-ID: <33165A87.1AB2@digitalwebsat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:09:43 -0600 From: Smith3 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Access charges for Internet and other enhanced service providers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2035 I regret that I have been performing duties for the US Navy for the last month and just recently became aware of the consideration to charge Internet Service Providers a per minute charge. It seems that this charge is an attempt by telephone companies to get a part of the 'Internet pie'. If allowed it will be passed on to the consumer with additional service charges added. It could very well mean the end of individual access to the Internet as we see it today. Today's Internet user uses the Internet to communicate with his neighbors throughout the country and the world. Internet communications have spawned a social intercourse never before seen in recorded history. People are learning the viewpoints of their fellow Americans thousands of miles away. They are being exposed to cultures and ideas which are new and sometimes different. They are learning to understand the thinking of people located in areas far removed from their own. This understanding is helping to foster continued peace not only in the United States, but also abroad. More importantly, people from other countries and cultures are being exposed to the United States culture. We are being understood better and better. This is good. This is necessary. Communications have long been the stumbling block to understanding and have caused conflict daily. The Intenet improves communications better than any other media since movies, television and, yes, the telephone. Internet Service Providers allow the average American a fair and affordable access to the Internet. The more the fees, charges or requirements that a government allows to be levied on these servants, the fewer will be the number of Americans who can communicate with their neighbors or world sharers. I beseech you to champion causes to help the individual and do not pass the per minute charge that phone companies are asking. Let them compete with everyone else fairly. Thank you, Milton Smith 420 Third Street Aransas Pass, TX 78336 512 758-5519 From jschm18@catamaran.netwave.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:36 1997 Return-Path: jschm18@catamaran.netwave.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00953 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:36 -0500 From: jschm18@catamaran.netwave.net Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25670; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:05:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from catamaran.netwave.net(207.112.132.11) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025668; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:05:37 -0500 Received: from distruction (pppc34.netwave.net [207.112.132.84]) by catamaran.netwave.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id WAA13440 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:20:41 -0600 Message-ID: <3316593F.3946@netwave.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:04:15 -0600 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: read this now then send something back Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1089 I believe that this will cause many users to turn away from the internet. Is this wrong or not that is up for you to decide. When I first heard about this, I thought about how Bill Clinton said lets buid a bridge to the 2100 century. To me it sound like the telephone companies are trying to tare down that bridge by charging an amount per min. I know one thing if the telephone companies get away with that I will not be using the internet because of the cost. I do not believe you know important the internet is to me. I use the internet a lot for school and the projects that are given to me by my teachers. I am an 18 year old student that attends Oswego Community High School. I do plane to go to college and to continue my education, which will be limited to just the school if this bill is passed. Please feel free to e-mail me at jschm18@netwave.net. Although I do not believe that I will hear back from someone because this letter probaly won't even be read. Yours Truly, Jonathon Michael Schmidt From mtstill@teknetwork.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:36 1997 Return-Path: mtstill@teknetwork.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00956 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:36 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25696; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:08:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from www.teknetwork.com(204.77.185.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025691; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:07:52 -0500 Received: from default (fre-26.ppp.teknetwork.com [204.77.185.36]) by www.teknetwork.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA21358 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:07:49 -0600 Message-Id: <199702280407.WAA21358@www.teknetwork.com> From: "Mike Still" To: Subject: No phone company internet access charges Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:12:01 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1120 To whom it may concern, I respectfully request that you deny the phone companies monopoly on the last bastion of free communications. The internet was originally developed using our tax dollars and now the monopolistic phone companies see that maybe, people have found a different avenue for the exchange of ideas and information outside of their realm. Several issues have been brought to light the last couple of years regarding "regulating" the internet. Who is to do it? and who is checking the checker?. I find the whole issue ludicrous at best and revolting at the very least. As an american who places great values on our country and it's principles, I can't understand why the government would want to "sell out" to the Bells. Please, I urge you to reject their request and keep the internet available to ALL americans. Information is essential in this day and age in which we live and such a move would only stifle it, making it harder for us to keep our world leader standing let alone educating our young so they might have a better life than our generation. Respectfully, mstill@teknetwork.com From skiboom@usa1.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:37 1997 Return-Path: skiboom@usa1.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00959 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:36 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25645; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:03:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.usa1.com(204.249.224.68) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025642; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:03:27 -0500 Received: from [204.249.225.162] by franklin.usa1.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-11518) with ESMTP id AAA163 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:00:50 -0500 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@fcc.gov From: "Richard A. Schwartz" Subject: Telephone Company Injustice Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:00:50 -0500 Content-Length: 408 I was just informed that the telephone companies are requesting additional charges for time spent on the internet. Please do everything possible to prevent them from taking advantage of the public and stifling the exchange of information and the freedom to communicate. The telephone companies make enough money already and don't need to bilk the public with another scheme. Thank you. Richard A. Schwartz From KSK2267@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:37 1997 Return-Path: KSK2267@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00962 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:37 -0500 From: KSK2267@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25615; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:00:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout17.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.43) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025600; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:59:45 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout17.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id WAA17706 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:59:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:59:23 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227225807_1646208665@emout17.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: internet access charges Content-Length: 638 I have been made aware of an attempt for the phone companies to charge the consumer either by the minute, or by the hour for accessing the internet or some of the internet servers. The number that I dial to reach my server is a local phone number. I do not have to pay extra charges for local calls and think it's ridiculous that the phone companies would pull such a tactic to make an extra dollar. I am terribly upset over this and I would like to let the FCC know that I am in disagreement with this act. If you have more information regaurding the proposed rates, I would appreciate the FCC for forwarding that information to me. From AnnBaba@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:37 1997 Return-Path: AnnBaba@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00965 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:37 -0500 From: AnnBaba@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id XAA25657; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:04:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout11.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.26) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025653; Thu, 27 Feb 97 23:03:49 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout11.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id XAA06190 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:03:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:03:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227230325_1947355925@emout11.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: per minute charge Content-Length: 1631 I am writing in response to the proposal made by telephone providers to the FCC. I do not think it is the best interest of the general public, nor is it in the best interest of the economy of the United States. The proposed "per-minute" charge scheme would be highly damaging to the fledgling economy developing across the computer networks in this country. It would also be harmful to researchers, students, and government agengies across the country and world-wide. If per-minute charges are allowed to take effect, the effect would be a reduction of consumer interest, and a stagnation of academic progress and communications. I urge you to deny the proposal as it would deny many people the right to fast communications, as they would no longer be able to afford the charges. Many non-profit organizations and research groups would have a much more restricted access to this indispensable mode of communication. I urge you to do what is right for the general public of the United States, and for its many invaluable organizations. Please do not grant telephone providers' proposal as it is a monopolistic measure and would contribute to the rapid decline of services involved with the internet. You should consider how much economic damage this proposal will do to local access providers, major access providers (e.g. AOL), and universities as these groups attempt to develop and improve the communications and services provided on the internet. They would be hard pressed to deal with this new burden. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Ann Baba AnnBaba@aol.com From GerryG3@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:37 1997 Return-Path: GerryG3@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00968 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:37 -0500 From: GerryG3@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25585; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:58:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout02.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.93) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025579; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:58:04 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout02.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id WAA26419 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:57:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:57:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227225735_1249250005@emout02.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Charges for Internet Use Content-Length: 191 Although beyond little-publicized suspense date, allow me to register vehement displeasure and protest against permitting telephone companies to charge for internet usage. Garth G. Germond From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:38 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00971 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:37 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25567; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:56:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025563; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:55:57 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id TAA08866 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:55:34 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:55:34 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702280355.TAA08866@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: artf@tstonramp.com Subject: Form Data from 206.55.129.30 Content-Length: 565 Date: Thu Feb 27 19:55:34 PST 1997 address = 11351 Hartford Lane city = Pomona comments = email = artf@tstonramp.com name = Art Foltz regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = Calif statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 91766 From biscuit@niven.imsweb.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:38 1997 Return-Path: biscuit@niven.imsweb.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00974 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:38 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25574; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:57:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from niven.imsweb.net(206.174.10.10) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025572; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:57:37 -0500 Received: from biscuit (pin1asr-p06.imsweb.net [206.174.11.105]) by niven.imsweb.net (8.8.3/SCA-6.6) with ESMTP id DAA02495 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 03:55:55 GMT Message-Id: <199702280355.DAA02495@niven.imsweb.net> From: "Nancy Folds" To: Subject: internet email proposal Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:03:58 -0500 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1157 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01BC2502.834794C0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1114 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01BC2502.834794C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Sir I object the new FCC proposal that the phone companys are trying to charge internet email user. I don't think this charge is fair! We pay enough for the service that we use. I OBJECT STRONGLY TO THIS PROPOSAL ! -biscuit@niven.imsweb.net ------=_NextPart_000_01BC2502.834794C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Sir

I object the = new FCC proposal that the phone companys are trying to charge internet = email user.
I don't think this charge is fair!

We pay = enough  for the service that we use. I OBJECT STRONGLY TO THIS = PROPOSAL  !

-biscuit@niven.imsweb.net


------=_NextPart_000_01BC2502.834794C0-- From kkorte@flash.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:38 1997 Return-Path: kkorte@flash.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00977 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:38 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25442; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:44:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from endeavor.flash.net(208.194.223.40) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025432; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:44:16 -0500 Received: from korte-s (auisdn1-29.flash.net [208.194.210.29]) by endeavor (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA18581 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:40:34 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <3316529D.A29@flash.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:35:57 -0600 From: "Matthew W. Korte" Reply-To: kkorte@flash.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-SBXA (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No 96-263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 284 From: Matthew W. Korte 4305 Red Cloud Austin, Tx 78759 Please do not allow the phone companies to charge on a per minute basis for local calls. That would unfairly impact millions of individuals and countless business which rely on a flat rate local phone service. Thank you. MK From rmizrahi@daci.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:39 1997 Return-Path: rmizrahi@daci.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00980 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:38 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25492; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:47:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(207.15.196.45) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025486; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:47:16 -0500 Received: from beavis (jfd42.daci.com [207.15.199.42]) by smtp.daci.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id WAA01913 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:48:25 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199702280348.WAA01913@smtp.daci.net> From: "Ron Mizrahi" To: Subject: per minute charges. Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:44:19 -0500 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1424 The idea of per minute charges seem lucicrous to me. By charging a per minute rate, you are insuring a world full of 'haves' and 'have-nots'. If the legislation passes to enact these additional charges, the internet will become a thing solely for the use of people that have money (the rest of us will not be able to afford it). It may be that that is the idea, but if that is the case, it is sick. I have been a responsible internet user for over ten years. My meager existence depends on the Internet. I am a web-page designer and a web-master. If these charges go into effect, I will not be able to afford the services that I now use. The internet is a thing of beauty. The masses have access to all the world's information for the first time EVER. Usage is up because people are realizing true freedom for the first time. If this freedom is causing the lines to become clogged, then we need to enhance our technology. As it stands right now, the net is affordable and many people have access to information that they otherwise wouldn't. I use the net to search for anything from used musical instruments to the latest pictures from the hubble telescope to the latest developments in the tech world. I dread the thought of not being able to afford these things. Please consider us little guys before dashing our hopes against the rocks of greedy capitalism. Thank you. Ron Mizrahi rmizrahi@daci.com From sully@tab.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:39 1997 Return-Path: sully@tab.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00983 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:39 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25444; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:44:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from eros.tab.com(206.224.80.15) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025433; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:44:20 -0500 Received: from tab.tab.com (tab.com [205.198.215.10]) by eros.tab.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA16062 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:44:28 -0600 Received: from tab.tab.net (pm2-37.tab.com [207.170.78.37]) by tab.tab.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA14096 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:40:10 -0600 Message-ID: <3315FBBC.6BFA@tab.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:25:16 +0000 From: Frank Reply-To: sully@tab.com Organization: Self X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: (no subject) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1636 To whom it may concern, I have recently heard the telephone company has tried to get you guys to impose a "per min. Charge" for internet use. This is crazy. I am strongly against this. I currently use the internet daily and would discontinue this use if this is imposed. I think that this charge would further hinder the use and development ot the internet. I am a single parent and try very hard to make ends meet. I think that the internet has brought the world together. Just last night I had a discussion with a few guys from Australlia. They gave me a few pointers and were able to help me with my problem. I could NEVER afford to call them using a telephone. This is just one advantage of the internet. I could list many, many more. THE BOTTOM LINE: The telephone company is mad because they are not getting thier piece of the pie. My advice to them is DEVELOPE A NEW PRODUCT. This is what my company must do to survive in a declining market. THE INTERNET IS FIXING TO GO SATELLITE, AND CABLE ANYWAY!!!!!! Tell the telephone comp that thier lines are to slow for or data transfer and we will not be using thier lines for much longer anyway! If they want to continue to capitolize on the market they need to go into a newer and better technology than they currently use. This would bring them back thier piece of the pie. They can't continue to dominate a market if they don't use research and new technology just like the rest of the world. tell them to MIND THIER OWN BUSINESS. Please keep me informed - Sullivaf@tx.slr.com Regards, Frank Sullivan From Elmo3190@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:39 1997 Return-Path: Elmo3190@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00986 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:39 -0500 From: Elmo3190@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25355; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:41:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout12.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.38) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025352; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:41:38 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout12.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id WAA18648 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:41:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:41:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227224015_1980727625@emout12.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: internet telephone charges Content-Length: 334 To Whom it may concern: I'll put it simply, concise and quickly: I am NOT in favor of telephone charges for internet use. The phone company definetly gets theirs overcharging us for the phone. Enough is Enough!! I seriously doubt they are going to go broke anytime soon. Thanks for listening. -Larissa DeBenedette From gmck@bangornews.infi.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:52 1997 Return-Path: gmck@bangornews.infi.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00989 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:39 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25390; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:43:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from fh101.infi.net(205.219.238.172) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025382; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:42:46 -0500 Received: from pa1dsp18.bgr.infi.net by mh101.infi.net with SMTP (Infinet-S-8.8.5) id WAA06544; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:42:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <33167E25.2A8C@bangornews.infi.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:41:41 -0800 From: Gary McKay Reply-To: gmck@bangornews.infi.net Organization: InfiNet X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: local tellephones Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 355 I have been reading about local phone companies wanting to charge for people using modems to call the internet. I can see no better way to kill the ability of our people to get information. Most of us strain our budget to pay for the internet service, to charge more for the phone would eleminate lots of people from participation in the information age. From JenMayo1@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:52 1997 Return-Path: JenMayo1@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00992 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:52 -0500 From: JenMayo1@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25395; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:43:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout07.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.22) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025386; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:43:11 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout07.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id WAA24939 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:42:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:42:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227224141_-1474006442@emout07.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 nonformal Content-Length: 743 I would like to express my vote about the Regional Bell Operating Companies request to surcharge its customers when using the telephone system for data transmissions. It is my personal business what I do over a telephone connection, whether it be voice or data. In fact, most voice calls are placed to convey data, just not in bits, but rather voice. Furthermore, if they (the RBOCs) do get the official ok to surcharge its customers for data transmission, where does that leave fax machines? Although it is not a call to an ISP, it is the same in that it is a transmission of data via bits. PLEASE DO NOT let the Baby Bells stick it to us, the consumers. Thank you for your time, Sincerely, Jennifer Mayo 2932 Adams Road Niles, MI 49120 From StShawn@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:53 1997 Return-Path: StShawn@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00995 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:52 -0500 From: StShawn@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25423; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:44:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout18.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.44) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025414; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:43:58 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout18.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id WAA16008 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:43:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:43:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227224322_542902176@emout18.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Phone rates Content-Length: 899 Hello, I am writing in response to something I had heard through the grapevine that the FCC and telepone companies are trying to make it so we who use the internet would have to pay a per minute charge. Naturally as an internet user I am very unpleased at the thought of such a thing. I believe it would be unfair. We alreay pay for our time and maintenenc etc by our regular monthly bills to whatever our phone company is. Well, I could go on and on, but I think you get my point. The charges we pay to our internet providers is costly enough as it is and if this sort of legislation passes internet use will plummet I am sure. And then what? It's a mad house. Please shut down any idea of such a thing. Thank you, Shawn R Hare From gdswanson@juno.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:54 1997 Return-Path: gdswanson@juno.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01004 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:53 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25170; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:28:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from x4.boston.juno.com(205.231.101.22) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025167; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:27:50 -0500 Received: (from gdswanson@juno.com) by x4.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id W~V29031; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:25:18 EST To: isp@fcc.gov Cc: dtswanson@juno.com Subject: Telephone Charges for Internet Access (CC Docket No 96-263) Message-ID: <19970227.202338.3374.0.gdswanson@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 1.15 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 10 From: gdswanson@juno.com (Gary D. Swanson) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:25:18 EST Content-Length: 760 I am writing to comment on a matter currently under consideration by the Federal Communications Commission. I do not understand why local telephone companies feel they should receive an additional per minute charges for internet services. Being connected to the internet doesn't create any more problems on local telephone networks than do long local telephone calls. What is the difference between a teenager talking on the phone with a friend for a long period of time versus someone being connected to the internet through a provider with a local telephone number for a similar period of time. In my opinion, the telephone companies are simply looking for a way to increase their profits. Gary D. Swanson, 7533 Bear Canyon Rd NE, Albuquerque, NM 87109 From ay4570a@american.edu Fri Feb 28 11:45:54 1997 Return-Path: ay4570a@american.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01007 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:54 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25221; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:32:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from carthage.american.edu(147.9.1.7) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025216; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:31:47 -0500 Received: from winwood.acc-lab.american.edu (winwood.acc-lab.american.edu [147.9.201.190]) by carthage.american.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA24470 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:31:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3303C35E.3FAD@american.edu> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 20:43:58 -0500 From: aaron yassin Organization: American University X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: letter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 668 To whom it may concern, I believe that the per minute charge proposed by many telephone companies for internet use is rediculous. The internet should be open and accessable to anyone who can get on-line, and users should not suffer by having to pay additional per-minute charges that will only create additional profits for already wealthy telephone companies. Before a decision like this is made please consider the far reaching implications this could have. Every person should have access to the internet and this goal of connecting idividuals all accross the country should not be erroded for the sake of any large corporation Sincerely, Aaron Yassin From wtmaw@atl.mindspring.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:54 1997 Return-Path: wtmaw@atl.mindspring.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01010 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:54 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA24996; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:10:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailmule0.mindspring.com(204.180.128.191) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024993; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:10:30 -0500 Received: from LOCALNAME (user-168-121-131-72.dialup.mindspring.com [168.121.131.72]) by mailmule0.mindspring.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id WAA24809 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:10:06 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199702280310.WAA24809@mailmule0.mindspring.com> X-Sender: wtmaw@pop.atl.mindspring.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:55:52 -0500 To: isp@fcc.gov From: Murph Subject: per minute charge for using the internet Content-Length: 273 There is a rumor floating around that the phone companies are petitioning the FCC to permitt them to charge a per minute fee for using the internet. The phone companies just want more money (as usual). Please deny the phone companies the right to do this. Bill Murphy From jschltz@flash.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:55 1997 Return-Path: jschltz@flash.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01013 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:54 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA24949; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:06:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from endeavor.flash.net(208.194.223.40) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024947; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:06:12 -0500 Received: from jschltz.flash.net (ctc2-84.flash.net [207.181.200.84]) by endeavor (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA02686 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:03:00 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <331648E9.2612@flash.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:54:33 -0600 From: "James P. Schiltz" Reply-To: jschltz@flash.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-NSCP (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No 96-263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 89 I would like to log my grievance against CC Docket No 96-263. James Schiltz Berwyn, Il. From lmalear@telsoft.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:55 1997 Return-Path: lmalear@telsoft.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01016 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:55 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA24965; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:07:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns1.telsoft.net(206.31.238.5) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024962; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:07:18 -0500 Received: from telsoft ([206.148.118.241]) by fmhlmis01.telsoft.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-12865) with SMTP id AAA99 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:06:07 -0500 X-Mailer: BeyondMail for Windows/SMTP 2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: isp@fcc.gov From: lmalear@telsoft.net (Laura Malear) Subject: Nooooo Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:12:33 -0800 X-BeyondMail-Priority: 1 Message-Id: Conversation-Id: <199702280116.UAA05128@zeus.netset.com> In-Reply-To: <199702280116.UAA05128@zeus.netset.com> Reply-To: Laura Malear Content-Length: 102 My name is Laura and I strongly object to charing per minute rates for internet use. It is not right. From tooltime@pilot.infi.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:55 1997 Return-Path: tooltime@pilot.infi.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01019 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:55 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA24938; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:05:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhost.infi.net(208.131.167.6) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024931; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:05:23 -0500 Received: from pa14dsp3.orf.infi.net by mh004.infi.net with SMTP (Infinet-S-8.8.5) id WAA25487; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:06:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3313DACF.4DAE@pilot.infi.net> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 22:40:23 -0800 From: Toolman Reply-To: tooltime@pilot.infi.net Organization: Tooltime X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: FCC charges for Internet service Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1387 Sir, There is no reason that the internet should have a per minute usage charge added to it. The telephone companies have been ripping off the american public for so long that they are tired of it and are finding other ways to communicate that the telephone companies cannot charge for. That is the only reason and I stress the ONLY reason that the telephone companies want a per minute usage charge for internet access. The telephone company has enough money and enough reasources to provide all services that are needed. What about celluar phones? I didn't hear the phone companies crying when they had to add area codes due to all of the cell phones that are out there. You know why? It is because they knew that they could charge the american public through the nose for it. Isn't enough enough. If there is a usage charge then the public schools could not afford the internet and neither could the parents of the school children. Lets try and keep our mind on the fact the our goal is to improve our way of life and living be teaching and educating the people not getting every cent out of people that they can squeeze out of them. I can guarante that if this was put to a vote by the american public that it would fail !! That is the exact reason that you are trying to shove it through with as little people knowing as possible. Signed, VERY UPSET Keith Pell From mlees@tenet.edu Fri Feb 28 11:45:56 1997 Return-Path: mlees@tenet.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01022 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:56 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA24872; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:01:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from leslie-francis.tenet.edu(198.213.2.9) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024870; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:01:16 -0500 Received: (from mlees@localhost) by francis.tenet.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA23747; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:00:50 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:00:49 -0600 (CST) From: Mary Fullingim Lees To: isp@fcc.gov cc: Mary Fullingim Lees Subject: charges per minute Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Length: 333 To Whom It May Concern: I was told that it is being discussed charging e-mail users with cost per minute rates. I am very much opposed to this and feel that this is just one more way for phone companies to benefit from preying on the consumer. I appreciate any help you can give in this area. Thank you. Sincerely, Mary Lees From kbrian@brainerd.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:56 1997 Return-Path: kbrian@brainerd.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01025 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:56 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA24914; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:04:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from alpha.brainerd.net(206.10.20.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024907; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:04:38 -0500 Received: from ascend1-5.brainerd.net by alpha.brainerd.net; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/18Jan96-0309PM) id AA23762; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:06:05 -0600 Message-Id: <3315F5DF.657C@brainerd.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:00:15 +0000 From: BDK Reply-To: kbrian@brainerd.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: PLEASE, DO NOT ALLOW PHONE COMPANIES TO CHARGE INTERNET USERS BY THE MINUTE!!! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 284 Greetings, If you should decide to allow phone companies to charge Internet users by the minute you will be single handedly killing the greatest learning tool of our time. This valuable tool will whither and die should you allow this. Please....stop them in their tracks Brian Kile From floroy@frii.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:57 1997 Return-Path: floroy@frii.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01028 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:56 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24809; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:58:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from phobos.frii.com(204.144.241.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024807; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:57:48 -0500 Received: from floroy-1 (ftc-72.ppp.frii.com [208.146.242.182]) by phobos.frii.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id TAA29139 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:56:53 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <33164463.14FA@frii.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:35:15 -0700 From: FMB Reply-To: floroy@frii.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: proposal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 124 I'm strongly opposed to the proposal filed with the FCC to impose per minute charges to internet charges. FMBarrowman, CO From lebao@nbnssmtp1.nb.rockwell.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:57 1997 Return-Path: lebao@nbnssmtp1.nb.rockwell.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01031 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:57 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24780; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:56:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from snail.nb.rockwell.com(129.172.125.251) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024777; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:55:40 -0500 Received: from nbnssmtp1.nb.rockwell.com (nbnssmtp1.nb.rockwell.com [129.172.197.16]) by nb.rockwell.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA18110 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:55:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by nbnssmtp1.nb.rockwell.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63) id <01BC24DF.5363AF00@nbnssmtp1.nb.rockwell.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:52:05 -0800 Message-ID: From: Le Bao To: "'isp@fcc.gov'" Subject: Protest. Date: Mon, 27 Feb 1995 09:52:28 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 156 I seriously protest the plan to charge internet telephone connection on per minute basis. Bao Le 736 N. East St. Anaheim, CA 92805 baole@earthlink.net From sosfas@mail.myriad.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:57 1997 Return-Path: sosfas@mail.myriad.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01034 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:57 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24782; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:56:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.myriad.net(204.57.67.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024778; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:55:41 -0500 Received: from sosfas.myriad.net (dialup501.myriad.net [206.96.201.11]) by mail.myriad.net (8.8.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id UAA26815 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:55:20 -0600 X-Disclaimer: The sender is solely responsible for the content of this message. Message-ID: <33133528.EEC@mail.myriad.net> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 12:53:28 -0600 From: "S.O.S." Organization: family X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: modem taxes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 693 Dear sirs, I have been reading how phone companies are requesting legislation/ regulation to charge internet modem users "per minute" rate, because they say we the internet users are overburdening their equipment. Phoooooo! They are and have been more than happy to charge us a set rate for phone lines which up until now may seldom get more than one or two personal or work related phone calls a week, but now that the consumer actually wants to use their service then they want more. If they really need to reduce line usage then perhaps they should come up with a way for consumers to stop unwanted (I personally don't want any) sales solicitations over the phone. Sincerely, S.O.Shepherd From twa1@lips.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:58 1997 Return-Path: twa1@lips.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01037 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:57 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24657; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:49:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from blubber.lips.net(208.137.160.20) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024652; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:49:15 -0500 Received: from default (modem-40.max1.lips.net [208.135.252.40]) by lips.net (8.8.3/8.7.4) with ESMTP id UAA16431 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:48:45 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199702280248.UAA16431@lips.net> From: "twa1" To: Subject: No Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:47:25 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1160 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 58 Please just say no to the telephone companies.Thank you. From jessy@cnwl.igs.net Fri Feb 28 11:45:58 1997 Return-Path: jessy@cnwl.igs.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01040 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:58 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24736; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:54:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from host.cnwl.igs.net(206.248.47.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024734; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:54:03 -0500 Received: from jessy.cnwl.igs.net (ttyA12.cnwl.igs.net [206.248.47.48]) by host.cnwl.igs.net (8.7.6/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA05888 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:53:31 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199702280253.VAA05888@host.cnwl.igs.net> From: "Jessy" To: Subject: Phone Bill !!!!!! Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2097 21:54:11 -0500 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 221 Eought, is Eought!!! Already. I think you make eought profits throughtout the year. You don't need to add more to my phone bills', just because I use the Internet for entertainment. I don't believe you guys!!!! Eought. From Xena18@prodigy.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:58 1997 Return-Path: Xena18@prodigy.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01043 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:58 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24674; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:50:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from pimaia2y.prodigy.com(198.83.18.95) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024671; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:49:57 -0500 Received: from mime2.prodigy.com (mime2.prodigy.com [192.168.253.26]) by pimaia2y.prodigy.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAB24532 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:31:40 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by mime2.prodigy.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id VAA14674 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:24:27 -0500 Message-Id: <199702280224.VAA14674@mime2.prodigy.com> X-Mailer: Prodigy Internet GW(v0.9beta) - ae01dm04sc03 From: Xena18@prodigy.com (MS AMBER L SMITH) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:24:27, -0500 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: DUH Content-Length: 380 The internet was originally created to be free, but company's got a hold of it so they could make money on it. We already pay for our internet use, it isn't fair to double charge for the use. It's not like anyone is calling long distance, thats why the company's are making the money. Yo can't just change the rules because it makes some poeples jobs a little harder!!!!! From lgerhard@juno.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:59 1997 Return-Path: lgerhard@juno.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01046 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:58 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24645; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:49:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from x18.boston.juno.com(205.231.101.29) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024642; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:48:39 -0500 Received: (from lgerhard@juno.com) by x18.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id VjP24764; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:47:30 EST To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Rate idea... Message-ID: <19970227.094944.8279.5.lgerhard@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 1.15 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 1-4 From: lgerhard@juno.com (Luke D Gerhardt) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:47:30 EST Content-Length: 132 I for my part do NOT approve of telephone company regulation of ISP's. (Even if my comment is past the deadline!) lgerhard :) From PouncerSAF@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:59 1997 Return-Path: PouncerSAF@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01049 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:59 -0500 From: PouncerSAF@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24620; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:47:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout20.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.46) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024613; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:46:59 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout20.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id VAA16930 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:46:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:46:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227214625_1646202518@emout20.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Additional per minute charges Content-Length: 321 To whom it may concern, How I use my phone line is my concern. Should I talk to a person next door or use the time for internet use is my choice. I pay a fee now for this phone line use. If what I am hearing about min. charges for internet usage is true, this would constitute a form of double billing. Eric Waddell From DEJMC@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:45:59 1997 Return-Path: DEJMC@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01052 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:59 -0500 From: DEJMC@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24619; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:47:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout04.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.95) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024614; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:47:01 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout04.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id VAA20506 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:46:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:46:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227214634_1450000821@emout04.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Internet Access Charges Content-Length: 662 I received an e-mail stating that there is a proposal with the FCC to impose per minute charges for internet usage. There is already a charge for the different internet companies and to be charged an additional charge just for using the phone lines is outrageous. We are already paying for phone service and should not be charged twice in addition to companies such as AOL that gives access to the internet. The internet opens many areas for education, research and it's like having a home library. I do hope the protest will change the minds of the telephone companies but mostly FCC who can put a stop to this. Thank you, De Mc Mahon San Diego, CA From drist@hotmail.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:00 1997 Return-Path: drist@f4.hotmail.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01055 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:59 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24489; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:39:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from f4.hotmail.com(207.82.250.15) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024485; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:38:45 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by f4.hotmail.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA20630; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:38:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:38:20 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199702280238.SAA20630@f4.hotmail.com> Received: from 206.52.52.185 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:38:19 PST X-Originating-IP: [206.52.52.185] From: "Jason Steagall" To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: OBJECT STRONGLY TO THIS PROPOSAL!!!!! Content-Type: text/plain Content-Length: 744 It is their belief that internet usage will diminish if users were required to pay additional per minute charges. The FCC has created an email box for your comments, responses must be received by February 13, 1997. in response This is just another way for the company to get more money not to menchen the Gove and I OBJECT STRONGLY TO THIS PROPOSAL thake you for you time Jason aka Drizzt drist@hotmail.com http://www.hotmail.com MY ISLAND HAVEN --------------------------------------------------------- Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------- From Akbrewer@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:00 1997 Return-Path: Akbrewer@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01058 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:00 -0500 From: Akbrewer@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24468; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:37:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout03.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.94) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024465; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:37:14 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout03.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id VAA22082 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:36:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:36:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227213650_-1373473471@emout03.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: cc docket no. 96-263 Content-Length: 587 it would be wrong to attach an extra fee to internet users phone lines. When customers sign up for phone lines it was and is with the understanding that the phone line would be unlimited usage. I use my modem for less than 15 minutes per day. Not all customers are on all day "tying up the lines" as you believe. I spend less time on the modem than I do on the phone. Are you then seeking to tack on a phone usage fine for phone customers who talk for extended periods of time? If so then you seriously need to consider adding this fine to second lines in houses with teenagers. From PlaCom3@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:00 1997 Return-Path: PlaCom3@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01061 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:00 -0500 From: PlaCom3@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24478; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:38:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout19.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.45) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024475; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:38:09 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout19.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id VAA27677; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:37:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:37:45 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227213744_851006219@emout19.mail.aol.com> To: JAMES314@aol.com, isp@fcc.gov, edlencorp@edlenc.fcc.gov, stargate@pwrnet.fcc.gov, changesint@megd.fcc.gov Subject: Gasoline go mlm Content-Length: 1929 -------------------- You can get on the list to be among the first to view this information when it is released next week. Then decide whether you can profit from that knowledge and the position that will be offered to you then. It costs nothing to drop your name in the hat. This information is very preliminary, and, as such, is subject to change when the official info is released. The one major industry that has not yet gone MLM is the gasoline and oil industry. In recent months, some major developments have been in the works. This is completely diferent from, and has absolutely no connection with any similar announcement that has been made in the distant past. A new network marketing company has been developed by a team of the biggest players in the industry. Lee Iacoca, Pat Robertson, and many top Executives at Mobil Corporation have purchased major investment positions in the startup of the MLM structure. Since the MLM structure is binary, a person can only have 2 legs - which means all additional recruits (beyond 2) MUST be placed somewhere in the existing downline under other people. You have a chance to be positioned at the very beginning of this organization - directly linked with the originators of this program - When info is available, you can decide to captalize on that positionit has not been launched yet! A business center has the potential to earn over $12,000 a day. Again, the binary structure allows for infinite depth in growth. This program is the product of major MLM players, it is hitting a market that is going to be the biggest industry yet to hit MLM. You can automatically build a large group of people and obtain more details by visiting http://192.41.34.190/gas.html To reserve your no obligation position, insert this email address in the referral box and then tell your key people. Sam Pe Touchsam@aol.com From SKLuster@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:01 1997 Return-Path: SKLuster@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01064 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:00 -0500 From: SKLuster@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24322; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:30:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout03.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.94) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024315; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:30:31 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout03.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id VAA16579 for ISP@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:30:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:30:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227213006_-837235795@emout03.mail.aol.com> To: ISP@fcc.gov Subject: Re: Increased Fees Content-Length: 509 To whom this may concern: I am absolutely appalled at the idea of the phone companies being able to charge extra money for the time spent online. We are already being charged for this and I have very strong feelings that should that happen many of us will not be able to continue to subscribe. If there are more details and information that I should be aware of than I certainly would appreciate receiving because at this time I am very angry with this possiblity of an extra charge being place on myself. From friendly@interaccess.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:01 1997 Return-Path: friendly@interaccess.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01067 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:01 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24396; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:33:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from mcfeely.interaccess.com(207.70.126.131) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024387; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:33:00 -0500 Received: from 206.183.68.116 (d116.loop.interaccess.com [206.183.68.116]) by mcfeely.interaccess.com (8.8.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id UAA19877 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:32:18 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <3316526C.714@interaccess.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:35:11 -0700 From: Steve Lafreniere Reply-To: friendly@interaccess.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Macintosh; U; PPC) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: No higher phone rates for Internet users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1504 To whom it may concern, I have just read a news article that angered me. It seems Ameritech and many local phone companies are trying to get you at the FCC to allow them to charge for Internet access separately from "regular" phone service, and by the minute. They claim they need the extra money to upgrade their equipment, lines, service, etc. I am absolutely against this. It's like a department store charging more for its merchandise, because of an increase in the number of customers to the store. The phone companies already have a set rate for phone service that realizes them a great deal of profit. They now have an increase in the number of phone customers. Regardless of whether it's because of actual phone or internet activity, it's still an increase in profit. They can pay for equipment changes, as always, out of that. Not only is it unfair to users of the Internet to pay a higher rate than phone customers, it will be to the detriment of the growth of the Internet. Already the "boom" of media interest has slowed since two years ago, as well as the numbers of new internest service subscribers leveling off. This is the crucial time when it's in the interest of everyone to get the "average", not-so-ahead-of-the-technology-curve type people interested in subscribing if the 'Net is to truly be the communications revolution it can be. Don't frighten these people off by an increase in the overall cost of than initial log-on. Thank you, Louis Lafreniere friendly@interaccess.com From Texmoses@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:01 1997 Return-Path: Texmoses@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01070 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:01 -0500 From: Texmoses@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24342; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:31:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout16.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024331; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:31:00 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id VAA12561 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:30:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:30:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227213036_207371935@emout16.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: per minute rates for local access to the Internet Content-Length: 1970 To whom it may concern... It has come to my attention that the local telephone companies have asked the FCC for permission to charge a per minute rate when computer users are accessing the Internet from their homes, via modems hooked up to plain residential telephone service. Now, I may not have all the details correct, as I have been informed of this through a "third person", but I do have a strong opinion on any scenario similar to this: As far as I am concerned, the local phone carriers have been getting away with murder for years, having had no competition to speak of, and have made a huge profit from local residential and business use during that time. Now, if what I hear is in any way true, they want a piece of the revenue pie from Internet use, as well. It is absurd for them to imply that telephone lines are being tied up by Internet connections, and therefore other local use is hindered. Faxes and modems have been around for many, many years, providing data transmissions via local land lines with never a peep from the local Bells. Further, the local Bell companies have done little to enhance the quality of connections, so that Internet users, such as I, continue to experience problems maintaining uninterrupted access to the 'Net. I firmly believe that, by allowing the local carriers to impose some per minute charge on Internet access, all Internet users will be poorly served by an agency it has entrusted with the the task of protecting against exactly this kind of abuse. Worse still, the chilling effect this kind of "tariff" would have on the use of local phone access might be extremely damaging to the Internet, itself. Higher costs associated with accessing the 'Net, would for many users mean substantially less use. The local carriers must be restricted, therefore, from imposing any kind of charge for access to the Internet, or any other kind of locally-accessed information resource. Thank you, Jonas Moses From 103747.365@CompuServe.COM Fri Feb 28 11:46:02 1997 Return-Path: 103747.365@CompuServe.COM Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01073 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:01 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24237; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:25:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from hil-img-1.compuserve.com(149.174.177.131) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024234; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:25:00 -0500 Received: by hil-img-1.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515) id VAA24860; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:24:37 -0500 Date: 27 Feb 97 21:23:54 EST From: "Allen S. Owens" <103747.365@CompuServe.COM> To: FCC Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Message-ID: <970228022353_103747.365_JHR45-1@CompuServe.COM> Content-Length: 605 >>> This letter is to protest the proposed additional per minute >>> charges requested by the telephone companies. It is my belief >>> that Internet usage will diminish if users were required to >>> pay additional per minute charges. Your agency is supposed to >>> protect us the consumers not the telephone company do not >>> allow this to happen it will destroy many small business' as >>> well as children in schools it will hurt all Americans the >>> only beneficiaries would be the greedy telephone companies. Allen Scott Owens 1101 E. Pecan Blvd. Suite 56 McAllen TX 78501 From bonjar@texas.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:02 1997 Return-Path: bonjar@texas.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01076 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:02 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24162; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:20:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail1.texas.net(207.207.0.34) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024160; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:20:27 -0500 Received: from texas-networkin (dnet06-23.sat.texas.net [206.127.4.173]) by mail1.texas.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA14567 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:20:03 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <33163F67.16B0@texas.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:13:59 -0600 From: "JOHN R. BARR" Reply-To: bonjar@texas.net Organization: Home X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Internet access charges Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 67 I would like to know when a decision will be made on this subject. From stefan1@webtv.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:03 1997 Return-Path: stefan1@webtv.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01079 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:02 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24168; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:21:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailsorter-1.isp.alma.webtv.net(205.180.153.85) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024165; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:20:47 -0500 Received: from mailtod-2.alma.webtv.net (mailtod-2.iap.alma.webtv.net [207.76.180.82]) by mailsorter-1.alma.webtv.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA04838; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:20:24 -0800 (PST) Received: (from production@localhost) by mailtod-2.alma.webtv.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA06421; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:20:22 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199702280220.SAA06421@mailtod-2.alma.webtv.net> From: stefan1@webtv.net (Stephan Martinez) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:20:22 -0800 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: internet fees Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 (WebTV 1.0) Content-Length: 993 while i'm sure that the explosion of line users has worried some phone companies i'm positive that they are really concerned about the revenues they are losing because they aren't price gouging yet. they were asleep at the wheel when the web came along and caught on with the general public. now they want to compensate because they know how profitible it could be to them if they only charged a "modest" fee. never before has so much information been readily available to the public and while it may have some ethical ramifications, it has proven to be an incredible way to communicat with others. i'm all for capitalism but this will get out of hand. soon, we would all pay premiums for different servers and monopoizing companieswould take us for a ride. please don't allow this to happen. stephan r. martinez "A life spent in constant labor is a life wasted, save a man be such a fool as to regard a fulsome obituary notice as an ample reward." George Jean Nathan (1882-1958) From snoble@thumb.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:03 1997 Return-Path: snoble@thumb.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01083 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:03 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24043; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:15:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from server.wnm.net(206.137.184.17) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024039; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:14:43 -0500 Received: from default ([206.137.185.104]) by server.wnm.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA04522 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:20:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3315F9D6.5BF8@thumb.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:17:10 +0000 From: noble Reply-To: snoble@thumb.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-KIT (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: per minute fees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 179 Please don't let the telephone companies impose a per minute charge for internet services. This action would render the Internet too expensive for me and many other users I know. From garussell@clandjop.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:04 1997 Return-Path: garussell@clandjop.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01089 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:03 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24005; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:13:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from joplin.com(204.71.98.15) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024001; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:12:42 -0500 Received: from garussell ([204.71.99.103]) by beeker.clandjop.com (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with ESMTP id AAA215; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:14:19 -0600 From: "Gary Russell" To: Cc: Subject: CC Dock No 96-263 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 08:55:23 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19970228021417809.AAA215@garussell> Content-Length: 420 The phone co. is getting aneff money from me. I have 2 phones in my house to acomidate my personal use and the internet. So, they are allrady getting payed for the internet. "Are thay going to ask for per-menit use on my other local calls next". My provide is paying for more then one T-line to the phone Co. and that is costing plany I'm sher too. Gary Russell 407 Grant Av. Neosho, Mo 64850 garussell@clandjop.com From hiSierra@as.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:04 1997 Return-Path: hiSierra@as.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01094 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:04 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA23852; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:06:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from web.as.net(205.167.153.4) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023850; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:05:50 -0500 Received: from hisierra (dl005.as.net [205.167.153.38]) by web.as.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id TAA02040 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:09:56 -0800 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970227195308.0068a550@pop3.as.net> X-Sender: hisierra@pop3.as.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:53:43 -0600 To: ISP From: csr Subject: Re: Per Minute Charge for Internet -Reply Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/enriched; charset="us-ascii" Content-Length: 810 I have been off-line for awhile and have a new E-mail address which is noted. Please fill me in on the latest status of the telephone companies wanting to double charge us internet users, Chuck and Ellen Rubey At 08:47 PM 2/6/97 -0500, you wrote: >This is an automated response to the message you sent to ISP@fcc.gov. Thanks for taking the time to write. We have established this mailbox for informal comments about usage of the public switched telephone network by Internet access and information service providers. More information on this subject is available at < We appreciate your input. > >Look for more features and announcements on our Web site, <, in the future! > >Sheryl Segal >ssegal@fcc.gov > > Chuck and Ellen From deke@efn.org Fri Feb 28 11:46:04 1997 Return-Path: deke@efn.org Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01101 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:04 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA23758; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:01:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from wakko.efn.org(198.68.17.6) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023755; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:00:54 -0500 Received: from garcia.efn.org (deke@garcia.efn.org [198.68.17.5]) by wakko.efn.org (8.8.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA22861 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:00:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:04:00 -0800 (PST) From: Deke Swallen To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: dumb... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Length: 176 Your idea is just plain,downright, gee golly, dumber than a dornail.........DUMB! Thank you :) -Deke Swallen deke@efn.org http://www.efn.org/~deke/ person who hates you... From mac@conninc.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:05 1997 Return-Path: mac@conninc.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01102 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:04 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23730; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:58:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from webserv.conninc.com(207.87.193.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023727; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:58:10 -0500 Received: by webserv.conninc.com from localhost (router,SLMAILNT V2.2); Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:59:28 Eastern Standard Time Received: by webserv.conninc.com from [207.87.193.140] (207.87.193.140::mail daemon,SLMAILNT V2.2); Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:59:27 Eastern Standard Time From: "mac" To: Subject: Charges!! Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:58:42 -0500 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19970227205928.0090f921.in@webserv.conninc.com> Content-Length: 190 I honestly don't think it's right!!.......one reason is that the phone company(s) need to add more to their systems. or everyone can just get 3-way calling and get a large group together. From felix22@sunlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:05 1997 Return-Path: felix22@sunlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01105 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:04 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA23789; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:02:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from earth.sunlink.net(204.170.191.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023784; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:02:19 -0500 Received: from m223.sunlink.net (m223.sunlink.net [204.170.188.55]) by earth.sunlink.net (0.0.1/9.9.9) with SMTP id VAA02849 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:02:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <33165C7A.1180@sunlink.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:18:02 -0800 From: John Thomas Reply-To: felix22@sunlink.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: PLEASE, DO NOT ALLOW PHONE COMPANIES TO CHARGE INTERNET USERS BY THE MINUTE!!! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 369 The cost of internet access would be exoribitant if the telephone companies are allowed to charge by the minute.This is just one way they are trying to get money from us because they didn't think the internet would become anything so great.It also affects freenets and educational instutions from using the internet for teaching pur- poses. This should not be allowed! From tturnbul@btigate.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:05 1997 Return-Path: tturnbul@btigate.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01108 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:05 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23697; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:57:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from btiserv.btigate.com(204.167.177.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023691; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:56:58 -0500 Received: from LOCALNAME (bti5200-1-a29.btigate.com [204.167.177.137]) by btiserv.btigate.com (8.7.4/8.6.12) with SMTP id TAA10350 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:54:27 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <331659C4.7A80@btigate.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:06:28 -0800 From: Tim Turnbull Reply-To: tturnbul@btigate.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-BTINet301 (Win16; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 627 From: Tim Turnbull 3000 Sand Hill Road Bismarck, ND 58501 tturnbul@btigate.com Dear Sirs: I would like to respond to the proposed per minute charge that the telephone companies are asking for. We are just getting to the point where the internet is available to almost everyone and now they want to start to charge more fees. There main concern is tying up the lines. With todays modern switching units this will not happen. I think this is just another way for the already rich phone companies to stick it to the average person on the street. Thank you for letting me voice my opinion...Tim Turnbull From cmiller@agate.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:05 1997 Return-Path: cmiller@agate.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01111 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:05 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23695; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:57:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from service.agate.net(199.191.1.80) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023690; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:56:40 -0500 Received: from cmiller.agate.net (cmiller.sdi.agate.net [204.117.17.46]) by service.agate.net (1.00) with ESMTP id UAA20607; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:56:08 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199702280156.UAA20607@service.agate.net> From: "Clark Miller" To: Cc: Subject: FCC Internet Access Fees Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:53:21 -0500 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Priority: 1 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2085 02/27/97 Dear Commissioners Quello, Ness, Chong, and Chairman Hundt: Living is rural Maine, I feel it is essential for you to hear my position regarding imposing fees on internet access, as issues in rural Maine are very similar to other rural areas of the country in obtaining internet access. I certainly agree with most of the positions the FCC takes in regulating the ever-expanding communication canopy under which we all live. What is important to me as an individual, who uses internet access for mainly educational purposes, is the fact that it is obvious to me that imposing fees will penalize people like me. Let me show you how: Where I live, I am limited to ONE server for internet access that does not incur a toll-call for me. Nationwide there are many people in this very situation. I truly believe that large corporations, such as America Online provide a squadron of lobbyists to influence the Commission to change the rules to something that may enable them to recovery from their recent problems with connection ability, service, and court orders. An access charge as proposed would favor America Online, and therefore increase growth, sales and the happiness of their stockholders. An access charge as proposed does however unfairly handicap the small internet access server /provider in rural areas such as mine. I feel that this would cause unfair trade, and thus be subject to very specific FTC statutes regarding fair trade and marketshare. I plan on making our State Attorney General , Drew Ketterer, aware of the proposal and probable effect on my ability to obtain simply internet access, from my little lobbyist-free server, for a fair price. Very Truly Yours, Clark Ross Miller P.O. Box 169, rt 150 Athens, ME. 04912 cmiller@agate.net From lorax@valueweb.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:05 1997 Return-Path: lorax@charon.valueweb.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01001 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:53 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25246; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:33:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(199.227.124.197) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025242; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:33:29 -0500 Received: from default (branch1-2-2.oaktree.net [208.134.79.60]) by charon.valueweb.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA16728 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:32:46 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199702280332.WAA16728@charon.valueweb.net> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "David Greene" To: isp@fcc.gov Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:29:42 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Reply-to: david@lorax.net Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.52) Content-Length: 521 i don't think telephone companys should be able to capitolize and control a seperate industry, please don't let this happen, i believe that an action such as putting per min. charges on phone use would only hinder students like me who pay for the internet out of their pocket... half of my resarch is done on-line! Why should anyone be allowed to take away from this valuable tool. DAVID GREENE ********************************* Visit my %NEW% Web Page @: http://www.lorax.net ********************************* From markv@sonic.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:01 1997 Return-Path: markv@sonic.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA00998 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:45:53 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id WAA25261; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:34:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from sub.sonic.net(208.201.224.8) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma025252; Thu, 27 Feb 97 22:34:00 -0500 Received: from d227.pm14.sonic.net (d227.pm14.sonic.net [208.201.230.227]) by sub.sonic.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA17315; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:33:32 -0800 Received: by d227.pm14.sonic.net with Microsoft Mail id <01BC24E5.0EFFFF20@d227.pm14.sonic.net>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:33:07 -0800 Message-ID: <01BC24E5.0EFFFF20@d227.pm14.sonic.net> From: Mark and Cherie van Gorder To: "'brownvk@assembly.ca.gov'" , "'isp@fcc.gov'" , "'kerry.mazzoni@assembly.ca.gov'" , "'president@whitehouse.gov'" , "'repriggs@hr.house.gov'" , "'senator.thompson@sen.ca.gov'" To: "'senator@boxer.senate.gov'" , "'senator@feinstein.senate.gov'" , "'vice-president@whitehouse.gov'" , "'woolsey@hr.house.gov'" Subject: Unlimited Service for Internet Service Providers Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:33:04 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2312 Dear Representatives: Currently, I am not charged for local telephone calls to connect to my Internet service provider. It is my understanding that if the local telephone companies are successful in their current lobby, they will require online service providers to do away with unlimited service. The result being that I and many other online service users will be charged for the amount of time we spend online. Such a change in Internet and other online access is clear: Those with money can and provide more information to than those with less money. In a time when the rich are getting richer it can be equally said that the information poor will get "information poorer" should such legislation be signed into law. The argument given by the local telephone companies is that they must charge by the amount of time used in order to provide enough "band width" to for regular telephonic service and that charging by the minute will encourage people to minimize their use of the online services. I encourage you to refuse the request by the phone companies to require Internet Service Providers to suspend unlimited service. The Internet provides a valuable tool for communication and commerce and I reject any attempt by phone companies to restrict, regulate or cause additional charges to be incurred for its use. We have been paying the phone companies for years now and portions of the monies received by the phone companies was to go toward building additional telephonic infrastructure. The fact that the telephone companies have failed to do so should not become the burden of people taking advantage of newly available technologies. More to the point, the Communications Act of 1995 was specifically written to increase competition among communications providers. If local telephone companies can no longer adequately support their operations perhaps it is time to let the market make its adjustments and let new entrepreneurial competitors take a shot at serving Internet service users. NOTE: Please respond to this email with either standard or email indicating the status of this issue or by providing me additional information if you have reason to believe that I am misinformed. Sincerely, Mark van Gorder 2001 Piner Road #258 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 From c21best@caribe.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:06 1997 Return-Path: c21best@caribe.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01120 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:05 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23561; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:44:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.caribe.net(204.183.116.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023555; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:44:51 -0500 Received: from caribe1-114.caribe.net (caribe1-114.caribe.net [199.0.181.114]) by mail.caribe.net (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA28904 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:36:05 -0400 (AST) Received: by caribe1-114.caribe.net with Microsoft Mail id <01BC24F6.C6E6CAE0@caribe1-114.caribe.net>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:39:57 -0800 Message-ID: <01BC24F6.C6E6CAE0@caribe1-114.caribe.net> From: Jonh Balossi To: "'isp@fcc.gov'" Subject: Cargo por minuto por aceso al Internet! Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:36:03 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 521 Me parece ridiculo que tan siquiera se considere cobrar por minuto por = acceso al Internet. Esto es igual a cualquier otra llamada con la gran = diferencia que ofrece educacion y conocimiento. No me parece justo que = se penalize al consumidor solo para hacer mas ricas a companias que ya = de por si explotan a los consumidores. Si de verdad el gobierno busca = hacer justicia social. En lugar de cobrar adicional al consumidor = deberia imponerle impuestos adicionales a esas companias. Atentamente, Angie Hernandez From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:06 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01123 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:06 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23522; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:40:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023515; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:40:32 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA25520 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:40:09 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:40:09 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702280140.RAA25520@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: GregleeM@aol.com Subject: Form Data from 152.163.237.17 Content-Length: 554 Date: Thu Feb 27 17:40:09 PST 1997 address = 309 Oriole St. city = Ojai comments = email = GregleeM@aol.com name = Greg Morin regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = Ca statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 93023 From josie7@ix.netcom.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:06 1997 Return-Path: josie7@ix.netcom.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01126 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:06 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23520; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:40:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com(206.214.98.14) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023518; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:40:50 -0500 Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA24498 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:40:26 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:40:26 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199702280140.TAA24498@dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com> Received: from ogd-ut1-07.ix.netcom.com(205.186.175.39) by dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma024364; Thu Feb 27 19:38:48 1997 From: josie7@ix.netcom.com (Mary J. Morton) Subject: Fwd: (Fwd) Phone Companies Suck To: isp@fcc.gov Content-Length: 11393 ---- Begin Forwarded Message Return-Path: Received: from server2.powernet.net (toor@server2.powernet.net [199.172.142.5]) by ixmail6.ix.netcom.com (8.7.5/SMI-4.1/Netcom) id PAA04887; Sun, 9 Feb 1997 15:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from default (rno_pm1-s10.powernet.net [206.42.18.40]) by server2.powernet.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA04883; Sun, 9 Feb 1997 16:11:08 -0800 Message-Id: <199702100011.QAA04883@server2.powernet.net> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Stef Fowler" To: xmas@oakweb.com, carlin@powernet.net, michael_klug@msn.com, gaholmes@interl.net, pat Parsons , Stan , josie7@ix.netcom.com (Mary J. Morton), evenstar@gulfsurf.i Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 15:42:53 -08:0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: (Fwd) Phone Companies Suck Reply-to: garnet@powernet.net X-Confirm-Reading-To: garnet@powernet.net X-pmrqc: 1 Return-receipt-to: garnet@powernet.net Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.42) ------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- Date: Sun, 09 Feb 1997 18:05:09 +0000 From: "Don E. Blackwell" To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Phone Companies Suck ------------4AE910644500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Please add your name to the bottom, and forward to everyone on your mailing list and especially to: isp@fcc.gov --------------------------------------------------------- To the proper authorities at the FCC: I am writing to you as a concerned citizen, in an effort to curtail a potential problem. I hear the phone companies are requesting that additional "per minute" charges be levied against Internet users, citing that our Internet usage has or will hinder the operation of the telephone network. I believe you would be ill-advised to support such a movement, and I will list my reasons for your consideration. #1- As telephone users, we have a right to use our telephones in any manner we see fit; as long as we do not break any laws while doing so. I realize the phone companies are attempting to create legislation to prevent the use of the Internet without additional charges, but at the current time, I am not aware of any laws we are breaking while using the phone to "dial-up" an Internet Service Provider. We are merely using technology to our advantage, which is something the phone companies have been doing for a long time. #2- Current Internet access charges are in-line with other communication facility charges. There are conventions in place to use the Internet for advertising. Just as our air waves are polluted with advertisements to assist in defraying the costs associated with broadcasting, these same opportunities are available through the Internet. As the Internet comes closer to integration with other broadcasting mediums, new opportunities will arise for commerce and taxation. The phone companies will have every opportunity to exploit these newfound advertising and marketing venues. They will not suffer losses created by these technologies, they will discover new ways to profit from them, ways that do NOT require unnecessary legislation or additional fees for Internet "access". #3- In many cases, the people using the Internet are already paying for additional phone service. They are adding additional phone lines, and this means profits for the phone companies. #4- The quality and availability of telephone service will dictate the public's willingness to pay for it. The technologies used to communicate over the Internet are clearly taking advantage of the existing capabilities offered by telephone networks. Rather than finding ways to increase the charges for use of existing technologies, the phone companies need to occupy themselves with taking the lead on development of "new and better" technologies. Most people, even when the opportunity to use an Internet telephone exists, will not rely on it for their sole communications tool. Just as the invention of the fax machine created new communications opportunities, so has the Internet. When the fax machine was invented, did the U.S. Postal Service lobby for legislation to "tax" fax usage, in an attempt to replace lost revenues? And if they did, were they successful? Or; did they step-up their efforts to provide a different, "higher in quality", delivery system? #5- Perhaps most importantly, telephone companies are currently taking every step possible to enter new markets, markets they intend to dominate, in an effort to increase their profits. In a free-market economy, they have every right to do so. They also have a responsibility to act in a manner that is in the best interest of the public. Adding additional charges for Internet use will further inhibit access to the world's knowledge base. This is in no way in the public's best interest. There is already a distance between the "classes" as it were, and a segment of the population that is prevented from enjoying the benefits of access to knowledge due to their economic and/or educational condition. They are already at a clear disadvantage. Do not further hamper their chances at gaining social, economic, and educational equality by making Internet access more unreachable to this segment of the population. In closing; I am a concerned, tax-paying citizen of the United States of America. I urge you to resist any attempts by the phone and telecommunications companies to impose new legislation and/or collect additional fees for Internet usage. Thank you, D. Rex Downham Trish Patterson Clay B. Sachtleben Ruth Anderson Matthew W. Klovenski, Sr. C'Anne Louder Monte Louder Don Blackwell ------------4AE910644500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Please add your name to the bottom, and forward to everyone on your   mailing  list and especially to:  isp@fcc.gov
---------------------------------------------------------   ;  To the proper authorities at the FCC:    I am writing to you as a concerned citizen, in an effort to curtail a  potential problem. I hear the phone companies are requesting that additional  "per minute" charges be levied against Internet users, citing that our  Internet usage has or will hinder the operation of the telephone network. I  believe you would be ill-advised to support such a movement, and I   will list  my reasons for your consideration.
 
#1- As telephone users, we have a right to use our telephones in any   manner  we see fit; as long as we do not break any laws while doing so. I realize  the phone companies are attempting to create legislation to prevent the use of the Internet without additional charges, but at the current time, I am not aware of any laws we are breaking while using the phone to "dial-up" an  Internet Service Provider. We are merely using technology to our   advantage,  which is something the phone companies have been doing for a long time.
 
#2- Current Internet access charges are in-line with other communication facility charges. There are conventions in place to use the Internet   for advertising. Just as our air waves are polluted with advertisements to assist in defraying the costs associated with broadcasting, these same opportunities are available through the Internet. As the Internet comes  closer to integration with other broadcasting mediums, new opportunities will arise for commerce and taxation. The phone companies will have every  opportunity to exploit these newfound advertising and marketing venues. They will not suffer losses created by these technologies, they will discover new ways to profit from them, ways that do NOT require unnecessary legislation or additional fees for Internet "access".    
 
#3- In many cases, the people using the Internet are already paying for  additional phone service. They are adding additional phone lines, and this  means profits for the phone companies.     
 
#4- The quality and availability of telephone service will dictate the  public's willingness to pay for it. The technologies used to communicate  over the Internet are clearly taking advantage of the existing capabilities offered by telephone networks. Rather than finding ways to increase   the charges for use of existing technologies, the phone companies need to occupy themselves with taking the lead on development of "new and better" technologies. Most people, even when the opportunity to use an Internet telephone exists, will not rely on it for their sole communications tool.  Just as the invention of the fax machine created new communications opportunities, so has the Internet. When the fax machine was invented, did the U.S. Postal Service lobby for legislation to "tax" fax usage, in an  attempt to replace lost revenues? And if they did, were they successful? Or; did they step-up their efforts to provide a different, "higher in quality",  delivery system?    
 
#5- Perhaps most importantly, telephone companies are currently taking every step possible to enter new markets, markets they intend to dominate,   in an effort to increase their profits. In a free-market economy, they have every  right to do so. They also have a responsibility to act in a manner that is in the best interest of the public. Adding additional charges for Internet  use will further inhibit access to the world's knowledge base. This is in no way in the public's best interest. There is already a distance between the "classes" as it were, and a segment of the population that is prevented from  enjoying the benefits of access to knowledge due to their economic and/or educational condition. They are already at a clear disadvantage. Do   not further hamper their chances at gaining social, economic, and educational equality by making Internet access more unreachable to this segment of the population.  In closing; I am a concerned, tax-paying citizen of the United States of America. I urge you to resist any attempts by the phone and telecommunications companies to impose new legislation and/or collect additional fees for Internet usage.    
 
Thank you,
Stef Fowler
D. Rex Downham
Trish Patterson  
Clay B. Sachtleben  
Ruth Anderson  
Matthew W. Klovenski, Sr. 
C'Anne Louder 
Monte Louder
Don Blackwell
------------4AE910644500-- If you would like to be removed from our mailing list, please email me at garnet@powernet.net. Thank you. Sincerely, Stef Fowler http://www.agiftcenter.com From Dokea@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:07 1997 Return-Path: Dokea@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01129 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:06 -0500 From: Dokea@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23447; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:35:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout02.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.93) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023442; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:35:00 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout02.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id UAA05176 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:34:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:34:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227203436_446427258@emout02.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Charging Internet Users for Local Access Content-Length: 464 Please, you must not charge Internet users for local calls! I don't know if this is an e-mail rumor, but if it's true that the FCC is considering allowing companies to charge Internet users for their calls to local Internet providers, please don't do it! The Internet is still young and growing, and charging for local access is not only obsurd and discriminatory, it could really hurt the "information superhighway" as a medium. What an outrage! Holly Ambrose From mfuson@caverns.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:07 1997 Return-Path: mfuson@caverns.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01132 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:07 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23375; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:32:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from pvia.caverns.com(206.206.164.10) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023371; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:31:59 -0500 Received: from default (dialup0.pm2.caverns.com [206.206.164.131]) by caverns.com (8.7.5/8.7.1) with SMTP id UAA00182 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:31:34 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970227182257.0068845c@caverns.com> X-Sender: mfuson@caverns.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 beta 12 (32) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:22:57 -0700 To: isp@fcc.gov From: Mardell Fuson Subject: FCC 96-488 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Length: 664 Gentlemen: You are doing an enormous disservice to those of us who use the Internet as a learning tool by wanting to charge a "per minute" for useage. All of on the Internet have a provider ( or server) to whom we pay a monthly fee for useage of their server. It is not like we are enjoying the benefits of the Internet free of charge. If this legislation is passed, what will it be next? Are you also going to want to charge us in addition to our cellular telephone carrier? Will you want to charge us for the use of CB Radios or two way communication devices? Mardell Fuson 207 S. Maple Street Carlsbad, NM 88220 mfuson@caverns.com From meiselc@novalink.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:09 1997 Return-Path: meiselc@novalink.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01135 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:07 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23435; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:34:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from bifrost.novalink.com(192.233.90.8) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023432; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:34:43 -0500 Received: from [204.166.233.151] ([204.166.233.151]) by bifrost.novalink.com with SMTP id <2729-9>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:29:55 -0800 X-Sender: meiselc@mail.novalink.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@fcc.gov From: meiselc@novalink.com (The Meisels) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:29:52 -0800 Content-Length: 1067 Folks: It has come to my attention that there is a proposal before your committee to allow a per minute surcharge on telephones using digital services on-line. It is a myth that phone companies need such relief. They have encouraged such use and indeed even offer internet access themselves knowing full well what heavy traffic (digital and voice) does to service. Making the internet user who uses the net for a shorter period than local voice customers is a clever scam by the companies.I urge you to protect the users of the internet rather than the phone companies. They simply want another way to offset the cost of the intense competition that now exists. If you want to know what causes bandwidth problems examine the cell phone industry where the companies make extraordinary profits for rather mundane services.Also the companies already get exorbatant fees from call-waiting and caller-ID which cost pennies to maintain, but cost dollars to the customer. Phone companies do not need more relief, but their customers do. David and Carolyn Meisel From mercutio@gatekeeper.intrcom.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:04 1997 Return-Path: mercutio@gatekeeper.intrcom.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01090 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:03 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA23909; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:08:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(204.216.105.10) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023899; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:07:27 -0500 Received: from default (kimballj@pppS31.intrcom.com [204.216.105.254]) by gatekeeper.intrcom.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA01013 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:15:18 -0600 Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19970228020711.0067a808@mail.intrcom.com> X-Sender: mercutio@mail.intrcom.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:07:11 -0600 To: isp@fcc.gov From: Jason Kimball Subject: FCC rates for Internet. Content-Length: 1407 Last time I checked the internet was a source of FREE exchange of ideas, from e-mail and newsgroups or online chatrooms and live video confrencing. There is no way the phone company can get away with this. If they want to make more money, why don't they start their own ISP service with the new digital phone lines they are installing to connect big univerisities that are faster than T3s? Please reply, I object strongly to any extra charge that I pay to access an international phenomenon. _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ |http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/park/7459/index.html |kimballj@hotmail.com |jkimball@mail.orion.org |_mercutio_@msn.com |mercutio@xband.com |CoDe CrAcKeR@xband.com |CoDe CrAcKeR2@xband.com |CoDe CrAcKeR3@xband.com |Nin64tendo@gnn.com |N64valley@geocities.com < /a> From PiggJ@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:09 1997 Return-Path: PiggJ@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01138 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:09 -0500 From: PiggJ@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23421; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:33:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout05.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.96) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023417; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:33:48 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout05.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id UAA28565; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:33:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:33:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227203322_-1440466695@emout05.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov cc: PiggDen@aol.com, KeckOne@aol.com, jwkwlk-ogmo@worldnet.att.net, ThePiggs@worldnet.att.net Subject: Internet local access charges by the minute Content-Length: 4510 To Whom it May Concern: I recently received the following email message. I would very much like to know whether or not this proposal is being discussed. If it is currently under consideration, I strongly oppose per minute charges being applied to service which I already pay for. Competition in the local markets should be accelerated with minimal government restrictions to help enhance current capacity shortfalls (assuming they do in fact exist.) Jay Pigg FORWARDED EMAIL MESSAGE -------------------------------------------------- >>ALL Internet Users: >> >> You may or may not know but the issue of 'Access charges for >>Internet' is currently being debated. Here is a message that's >>floating across the Net. >> >> Your local telephone company has filed a proposal with the FCC to >> impose per minute charges for your internet service. They contend >> that your usage has or will hinder the operation of the telephone >> network. >> >> Internet usage will diminish if users were required to pay >> additional per minute charges. >> >> The FCC has created an email box for your comments: >> >> Send your comments to isp@fcc.gov and tell them what you think. >> >> Every phone company is in on this one, and they are trying to sneak >> it in just under the wire for litiagation. Let everyone you know hear >> this one. Get the e-mail address to everyone you can think of. >> >> isp@fcc.gov >> >> Please forward this email to all your friends on the internet so all >> our voices may be heard! >> >> Just passing it on . . . >> >>Thank You >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>Clyde Messinger /CEO Voice 1-810-679-3395 >>System. Admin. Fax 1-810-679-2147 >>clydem@greatlakes.net Modem 1-810-679-9686 >>check us out at http://www.greatlakes.net >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> --------------------- Forwarded message: Subj: Fwd: important -Forwarded Date: 97-02-27 14:01:40 EST From: PiggDen To: PiggJ CC: ThePiggs@worldnet.att.net Just thuoght you guys might be interested in this if you haven't already seen it! --------------------- Forwarded message: From: whowlet@burnsmcd.com (Winnie Howlett) To: piggden@aol.com, tgriffith@ms.oakgrove.k12.mo.us Date: 97-02-27 10:24:08 EST Have you heard about this??? Pass it on to anyone that you think might be interested! Pooh Received: by deadend.burnsmcd.com; id CAA01480; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 02:05:53 -0600 From: Received: from emout19.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.45) by deadend.burnsmcd.com via smap (g3.0.3) id xma001467; Wed, 26 Feb 97 02:05:30 -0600 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout19.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id CAA04057; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 02:53:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 02:53:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970226025355_1913582936@emout19.mail.aol.com> To: StormLion@worldnet.att.net, kwalker@burnsmcd.com, SKennedy@ecs.fullerton.edu, Luvwatches@aol.com, PLKsign@aol.com, DavisonM@aol.com, MAS1@pacbell.net Subject: important FYI >> >>ALL Internet Users: >> >> You may or may not know but the issue of 'Access charges for >>Internet' is currently being debated. Here is a message that's >>floating across the Net. >> >> Your local telephone company has filed a proposal with the FCC to >> impose per minute charges for your internet service. They contend >> that your usage has or will hinder the operation of the telephone >> network. >> >> Internet usage will diminish if users were required to pay >> additional per minute charges. >> >> The FCC has created an email box for your comments: >> >> Send your comments to isp@fcc.gov and tell them what you think. >> >> Every phone company is in on this one, and they are trying to sneak >> it in just under the wire for litiagation. Let everyone you know hear >> this one. Get the e-mail address to everyone you can think of. >> >> isp@fcc.gov >> >> Please forward this email to all your friends on the internet so all >> our voices may be heard! >> >> Just passing it on . . . >> >>Thank You >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>Clyde Messinger /CEO Voice 1-810-679-3395 >>System. Admin. Fax 1-810-679-2147 >>clydem@greatlakes.net Modem 1-810-679-9686 >>check us out at http://www.greatlakes.net >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From Domtesch@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:04 1997 Return-Path: Domtesch@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01096 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:04 -0500 From: Domtesch@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA23764; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:01:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout03.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.94) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023756; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:01:00 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout03.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id VAA22332 for ISP@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:00:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:00:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227210036_-1909105821@emout03.mail.aol.com> To: ISP@fcc.gov Subject: Docket 96-263 Content-Length: 138 I am against tacking on extra phone charges for internet use. Please vote against this Dominic DeFrank 4618 W. 191st Torrance, CA 90503 From dwhitcmb@jeffnet.org Fri Feb 28 11:46:09 1997 Return-Path: dwhitcmb@jeffnet.org Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01141 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:09 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23175; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:24:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from jeffnet.org(204.203.90.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023169; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:24:41 -0500 Received: from dwhitcmb.JEFFNET.org (ip195.jeffnet.org [204.203.88.195]) by jeffnet.org (8.8.0/8.8.0) with ESMTP id RAA15244 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:36:49 -0800 Message-Id: <199702280136.RAA15244@jeffnet.org> From: "Duane Whitcomb" To: Subject: don't allow per minute charges Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:26:17 -0800 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 133 A word of concern that phone companies may be allowed to charge per minute fees. I wish to express my opposition to this proposal. From fkj4-ms-lp@emh6.korea.army.mil Fri Feb 28 11:46:10 1997 Return-Path: fkj4-ms-lp@emh6.korea.army.mil Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01114 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:05 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23608; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:49:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:49:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from emh3.korea.army.mil(143.138.10.20) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023601; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:49:30 -0500 Received: from [144.59.253.52] by host.emh3.korea.army.mil id aa12977; 28 Feb 97 8:01 KST X-Sender: kschramm@143.138.10.40 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.1.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@fcc.gov From: MAJ Kathy Schramm Subject: Phone Charges Message-ID: <9702280801.aa12977@host.emh3.korea.army.mil> Content-Length: 637 I realize this is past your deadline, but I still felt a need to let my voice be heard. I hope you have denied the request by phone companies to charge by the minute for access to the internet. If an internet provide pays for local or 800 service for their customers to contact them that is all the phone companies should profit from. If you allow local phone companies to start charging by the minute for access to the internet you will discourage use of the internet and open the door for increased phone charges, i.e., by the minute for all local service. I strongly oppose this move by telephone companies. Kathryn J. Schramm From gene@netset.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:10 1997 Return-Path: gene@netset.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01144 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:09 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23093; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:21:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from zeus.netset.com(206.183.227.10) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023083; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:21:39 -0500 Received: from gene (ppp057.dialup.cmh.netset.com [206.183.228.107]) by zeus.netset.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA05594 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:20:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:20:28 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199702280120.UAA05594@zeus.netset.com> X-Sender: gene@netset.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@fcc.gov From: SANDMAN Subject: MY COMMENTS Content-Length: 238 I DONT AGREE AT ALL WITH THIS RULE YOUR TRYING TO PASS, PLEASE JUST LEAVE US WEBAHOLICS ALONE. I AM ADDICTED AND I WONT LET YOU TAKE IT AWAY FROM ME. LEAVE THE INTERNET COSTS ALONE. YOU ALREADY HAVE TO PAY ENPUGH. ITS NOT LIKE ITS FREE. From summer@kingsnet.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:10 1997 Return-Path: summer@kingsnet.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01147 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:10 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23171; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:24:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from kingsnet.com(207.126.72.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023167; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:24:35 -0500 Received: from unknown (dialup-84.kingsnet.com [207.126.73.84]) by knet.kingsnet.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA29781 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:24:54 -0800 Message-ID: Priority: Normal To: isp@fcc.gov MIME-Version: 1.0 From: joanne Subject: Per minute charges. Date: Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:31:09 PST Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; X-MAPIextension=".TXT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 486 Thank you for letting me know about this so I can e-mail you and let my = voice be heard. I am a full-time college student working a full time job with a car payme= nt to make. If I have to pay per minute charges, then there is no way = I can continue to pay for access to the internet. The only reason I can = afford it now is because of the flat monthly rate. I sincerely hope the per minute charges do not take affect. Sincerely, Summer A Kings Internet User. From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:10 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01150 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:10 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23041; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:18:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023039; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:17:51 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA15372 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:17:28 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:17:28 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702280117.RAA15372@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: m5293984@themall.net Subject: Form Data from 204.80.123.39 Content-Length: 565 Date: Thu Feb 27 17:17:28 PST 1997 = 6404 N. Amherst St. city = Moorpark comments = email = m5293984@themall.net name = Patrick Jandorf regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = CA statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 93021 From PJG1872@ritvax.isc.rit.edu Fri Feb 28 11:46:10 1997 Return-Path: PJG1872@ritvax.isc.rit.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01155 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:10 -0500 From: PJG1872@ritvax.isc.rit.edu Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA22914; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:12:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from vms1.isc.rit.edu(129.21.3.8) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022912; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:11:48 -0500 Received: from ritvax.isc.rit.edu by ritvax.isc.rit.edu (PMDF V5.1-7 #21575) id <01IFX7KW9ODS9FOUMB@ritvax.isc.rit.edu> for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:11:23 EST Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:42:46 -0500 (EST) Subject: the internet To: isp@fcc.gov Message-id: <01IFX8PGEFHW9FOUMB@ritvax.isc.rit.edu> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-Length: 2011 To whom it may concern: I do not support the plan to charge for internet service by the minute. It is true that by charging by the minute the use of the internet will decrease. The question is is this a good idea. The internet is quickly bringing the world closer to the ideal, which in my mind is unity. It connects people across the world for hundreds of different reasons in a way that people could only dream about twenty years ago. Imagine what the protests of the sixties would have been like had they the internet. The internet also allows for immeasurable amounts of information to be accessed. I personally use the internet as a research tool every time I need to write a paper. Another thing the internet allows for is information of a different kind, as in fast movement of medical files, importants buisness documents, and personal letters. Finally the internet cuts down on the use of tree's for dumb letters/junk mail/promotional material. Soon the world will be saving thousands of trees just because Ed McMan will email you to say that you might have won ten million dollars. That's not to mention how much mail is being saved from being delivered (and we all know about those postal workers). The truth is that the internet does require some time to use but if the telphone service charges by the minute that time will not decrease, only it's use will. I offer this bone to the telephone services fo our great nation. Cable companies are testing even now to see how well they can provide internet services and results are promising. They soon will aleviate the load. If that isn't satisfactory I recommend they improve their telephone lines (they are pretty old in some areas). I think most tax payers wouldn't mind kicking in some extra money for increased fidelity on their phone lines. I am very interested in this. please email me with any developements. Thanks for your time, Patrick Gaynard PJG1872@rit.edu it does require a little patients and some time to use though. From avill@cube.ice.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:11 1997 Return-Path: avill@cube.ice.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01160 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:10 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA22763; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:03:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from cube.ice.net(206.102.146.5) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022757; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:03:29 -0500 Received: from default (slip69.ice.net [206.102.146.69]) by cube.ice.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA09882 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:03:00 -0600 Message-ID: <33162F15.7620@cube.ice.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:04:21 -0600 From: Avo Vill X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket #96-263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 168 From: Avo Vill 2706 Wellington Way Bloomington, Il 61704-4660 email: avill@cube.ice.net Message: Keep the internet system the same. Do not increase the line charge. From GALCOR01@msn.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:11 1997 Return-Path: GALCOR01@msn.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01162 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:11 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA22716; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:02:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from upsmot02.msn.com(204.95.110.79) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022709; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:01:57 -0500 Received: from upmajb02.msn.com (upmajb02.msn.com [204.95.110.74]) by upsmot02.msn.com (8.6.8.1/Configuration 4) with SMTP id QAA03151 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:58:13 -0800 Date: Sun, 9 Feb 97 03:30:50 UT From: "Gary Alcorn" Message-Id: To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: internet surcharge proposal Content-Length: 492 I have an extra line in my home just for internet service. If the FCC approves per minute charges for the internet two things will happen, my second line will be removed to compensate for the added charges, and satellite providers for internet service will look more attractive. Please don't allow the greedy to win this time, they are just fearful that their long distance service will see less use. Gary Alcorn galcorn@dynisys.com 4572 Wintergreen Dr N Saginaw, MI 48603-1943 From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:11 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01165 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:11 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22621; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:57:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022619; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:57:41 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA05212 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:57:18 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:57:18 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702280057.QAA05212@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: CrosbyMark@AOL.Com Subject: Form Data from 152.163.237.17 Content-Length: 562 Date: Thu Feb 27 16:57:18 PST 1997 address = 7717 Church Ave city = Highland comments = email = CrosbyMark@AOL.Com name = Mark Crosby regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = CA statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 92346 From ljames1@phoenix.nlci.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:11 1997 Return-Path: ljames1@phoenix.nlci.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01168 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:11 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22511; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:51:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from phoenix.nlci.com(206.64.96.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022507; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:51:00 -0500 Received: from james486802.nlci.com by phoenix.nlci.com via SMTP (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1502/951211.SGI) for id TAA01670; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:50:07 -0500 Message-Id: <199702280050.TAA01670@phoenix.nlci.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:11:27 -0800 From: James Laster X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Re: Telephone Charges for Internet Access Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Length: 766 Dear FCC It has came to my attention that many telephone companys have ask the FCC for permission to charge for Local Access to the internet by the minite. The internet is used by many technicial people as my self to get support from computer company. To allow phone a phone company to charge by the minute for internet on local telephone would greatly hinder this useful tool for infomation exchange. Please do not allow phone company to charge by the minute for the internet. After all they already charge for the telephone line that the internet providers need to have to be a server station. This charge by the minute for internet service is a attempt to monoploize on this new tech. Why can't they continue to do business as they always have. From aarons@zianet.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:12 1997 Return-Path: aarons@zianet.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01171 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:11 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22543; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:52:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from zianet.com(204.134.124.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022541; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:52:31 -0500 Received: from lc100.zianet.com (lc100.zianet.com [204.134.124.200]) by nova.zianet.com (NTMail 3.02.12) with ESMTP id ya367430 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:48:23 -0700 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970216175734.00695a18@zianet.com> X-Sender: aarons@zianet.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 Demo (32) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 17:57:48 -0600 To: isp@fcc.gov From: Aaron Soto Subject: Billing Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Length: 2199 To Whom this may Concern, My name is Aaron Soto. I am an 8th grader in Las Cruces, New Mexico. I have loved computers since I was 9. So of course I had to get on-line. Well, since those days, I have become popular when people need assistance. I became more and more involved in computers. Recently, I have given 3 workshops on various topics. Then, I presented "Kids, Teachers, and the Internet" at the SNMTC (Southern New Mexico Technology Conference). I gave 2 presentations with room fulls of teachers anxiously waiting to see what was on the on-line world that they had heard so much about. I was truly amazed at the amount of teachers that wanted to get on-line. The resources are unlimited. The possibilities are endless. I went to my brothers house to check out the Internet before I logged on. I saw a program named "Internet Phone." I logged on to the server to see a list of people who I had never met. Soon, I was calling people like crazy. By chance, I called someone named Francesco Barbato. When he and I talked, we found we had lots in common. He lived in Rome, Italy. Finally after of months of talking, he and I got the change to meet. He flew to El Paso where he and I finally saw each other. I was delighted for the entire month that he stayed here. Now, because of that name I clicked on, I will be traveling to Rome. I will meet new people, see amazing sights, and learn more than any class can ever teach me. I think that if every home in the world had the Internet, the students would be more educated, businesses could do more, and families could feast their eyes on amazing facts. If you charge people to get on-line, these possibilities will be cut off. No business will expand, no families will have excitement to look forward to in the evening, but most importantly, the students will suffer. They will not be able to learn, grow, or have a truly amazing experience like I had with Francesco. If you charge us to use the Internet, you will hurt America's future. You will hurt our youth. You will make us suffer. We will be the ones who pay the price. Aaron Soto aarons@zianet.com Aaron Soto aarons@zianet.com http://www.zianet.com/aarons/ From flanery@ramlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:12 1997 Return-Path: flanery@ramlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01174 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:11 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22564; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:54:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from ram.ramlink.net(199.1.24.4) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022558; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:54:31 -0500 Received: from ash30.ramlink.net (ash30.ramlink.net [199.1.24.95]) by ram.ramlink.net (8.6.12/8.6.11) with SMTP id TAA09803 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:05:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:05:12 -0500 Message-Id: <199702280005.TAA09803@ram.ramlink.net> X-Sender: flanery@ramlink.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@fcc.gov From: Kent Flanery Subject: Ma Bell is reaching for our pockets Content-Length: 3700 I am very disturbed and opposed to the proposal to collect per minute charges for internet access beyond those collected by the access server company, since it is impossible to track where the data transfer is coming from. This is a great international resource if it is not allowed to be stolen from the worlds citizens. I vote no!!!! >Return-Path: DCOMER@HNTB.com >From: Doug Comer >To: Joe Scannell , > "'Comerpels'" , > JOHN COOK , > "DANDJCOOK@aol.com" , > David Hunter , > "DSIMPSON_1@bhsi.com" >To: "'Donna C. Harris'" > , > flanery , > Gary Minter , > Bruce Snook , > "Jornat1@aol.com" , > Larry Meier >To: "'Elizabeth Comer'" > , > Mack Harris , > Ken Alderson , > P J DiBlasi , > "'Phil Banton'" >Subject: Ma Bell is reaching for our pockets >Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 10:01:37 -0600 >Return-Receipt-To: > >Forwarded message begins here. . . . > ---------- > >>List of House of Reps: >> >> http://clerkweb.house.gov/members/house.htm?57,22 >> >>List of Senators' published email addresses: >> >> http://www.senate.gov/senator/membmail.html >> >> I am writing you this to inform you of a very important matter >> currently under review by the FCC. Your local telephone company has >> filed a proposal with the FCC to impose per minute charges for your >> internet service. They contend that your usage has or will hinder the >> operation of the telephone network. >> >> It is my belief that internet usage will diminish if users were >> required to pay additional per minute charges. The FCC has created an >> email box for your comments, responses must be received by February >> 13, 1997. Send your comments to >> >> isp@fcc.gov >> >> and tell them what you think. >> >> Every phone company is in on this one, and they are trying to sneak >> it in just under the wire for litiagation. Let everyone you know here >> this one. Get the e-mail address to everyone you can think of. > > > > > > > > > > From HBMAL@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:12 1997 Return-Path: HBMAL@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01177 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:12 -0500 From: HBMAL@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22575; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:55:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout01.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.92) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022571; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:54:47 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout01.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id TAA00878 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:54:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:54:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227195424_-2042389852@emout01.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Re: CC Docket No. 96-263 Content-Length: 4162 In a message dated 97-02-27 03:57:42 EST, JerWel369 writes: << This letter is to protest the proposed additional per minute >> >>> charges requested by the telephone companies. It is my belief >> >>> that Internet usage will diminish if users were required to >> >>> pay additional per minute charges. Your agency is supposed to >> >>> protect us the consumers not the telephone company do not >> >>> allow this to happen it will destroy many small business' as >> >>> well as children in schools it will hurt all Americans the >> >>> only beneficiaries would be the greedy telephone companies. >> >>> >> Please don't let us the consumers down. Don't let this pass. Thank You! Sincerely, Kathy Malicoat 910 Sunsetview Blvd. Tallmadge, OH 44278 E-Mail hbmal@aol.com --------------------- Forwarded message: Subj: Fwd: FCC Ruling Date: 97-02-27 03:57:42 EST From: JerWel369 To: Matrix60,Gerber5876,Cybilldoo To: Monkeyn663,DIS CNTENT,ShyAngl2 To: ZhoraNex6,LC5001,SmokeyLP To: Sporacle,AScheidel,HBMAL To: parker@abelink.com --------------------- Forwarded message: From: welch@abelink.com (Tracy Welch) To: alpine1222@aol.com, jerwel369@aol.com Date: 97-02-26 18:41:59 EST Hey guys, Read this email and do as it says......getting charged for local calls to the internet will put us all offline! Tracy >> >> Just passing this along.. read and heed if you want. You could make a >> difference. >> >> Brethern >> Please read the following note and act on it accordingly .... >> >> >> >> FCC COMPLAINT - CORRECT SUBMISSION FORM >> This just in from a "Speeder" who has further information about the *form* >> in which our complaints to the FCC at to go as... >> >> I was just informed that the FCC requires us to be exact >> when writing them about their hearings. Our prior letters >> were probably deleted. Please write to the FCC and follow >> these guidelines. >> >> 1. You MUST put "CC Docket No. 96-263" in the subject line. >> >> 2. You MUST sign your message with your full name AND full >> mailing address. >> >> The FCC address is: ISP@fcc.gov >> >> If this is NOT done, comments will be DELETED with no >> consideration. So please write again following the above >> guidelines. >> >> Send this message to as many users as you can! Or we will >> get charged by the minute for local phone service. >> >> >> Your prompt attention is very important! All phone companies >> >> are after this and are trying to sneak this in...do not sit >> >> back and wait it out. Write tonight!!! >> >> >> >> Address mail to: ISP@fcc.gov >> >> Subject line must say: CC Docket No. 96-263 >> >> Body of mail must state your complaint and >> >> your full name and mailing address. >> >> >> >> Cut and paste what the following complaint if it is easier >> >> for you: >> >> >> >>> -------- >> >>> >> >>> This letter is to protest the proposed additional per minute >> >>> charges requested by the telephone companies. It is my belief >> >>> that Internet usage will diminish if users were required to >> >>> pay additional per minute charges. Your agency is supposed to >> >>> protect us the consumers not the telephone company do not >> >>> allow this to happen it will destroy many small business' as >> >>> well as children in schools it will hurt all Americans the >> >>> only beneficiaries would be the greedy telephone companies. >> >>> ><> Please do this > > > ***************************************************** Tracy Welch (welch@abelink.com) Cyber-Country Magazine www.abelink.com/personal/welch ***************************************************** ******** NOW FEATURING ********* Lonesome Dove www.abelink.com/personal/welch/lonedove.htm The webs only old west online community where you can chat live 24 hours a day ***************************************************** "You've gotta go back down the road you leave behind" - David Lee Murphy ***************************************************** From idc8425@CONNECTNET.COM Fri Feb 28 11:46:12 1997 Return-Path: idc8425@CONNECTNET.COM Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01183 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:12 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22286; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:35:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.connectnet.com(207.110.0.12) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022282; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:35:40 -0500 Received: from default (max-sc-70.connectnet.com [206.64.47.70]) by smtp.connectnet.com (8.8.5/Connectnet-2.2) with SMTP id QAA05130 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:36:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <33162956.5644@CONNECTNET.COM> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:39:50 -0800 From: roy underwood Reply-To: idc8425@CONNECTNET.COM X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: per minute charges Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 468 I am totally against any per minute charge for the use of a phone line that I am already paying for on a monthly basis. If I am to be charged a per minute fee for Internet use, what will be next a per call fee to dial 911. This can not be allowed to go into effect. The phone companies make enough money to upgrade their equipment to meet the demand instead of decreasing usage by applying an additional fee for the usage. Roy L. Underwood From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:13 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01188 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:12 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22306; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:37:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022302; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:37:00 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA24782 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:36:36 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:36:36 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702280036.QAA24782@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: jallen@northrim.net Subject: Form Data from 206.206.31.101 Content-Length: 585 Date: Thu Feb 27 16:36:36 PST 1997 address = 2911 S. 2000 E. city = Wendell comments = This is an outrage. email = jallen@northrim.net name = Jerry Allen regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = Idaho statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 83355 From hgtg@coastalnet.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:13 1997 Return-Path: hgtg@coastalnet.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01189 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:12 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22271; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:34:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from nubbin.coastalnet.com(204.183.40.17) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022268; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:34:15 -0500 Received: from default (pm-gv1-22.coastalnet.com [204.183.45.22]) by nubbin.coastalnet.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id TAA20757 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:33:33 -0500 Message-ID: <3316273F.2CD0@coastalnet.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:30:55 -0500 From: Huburt Griffey X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: FCC Billing Plans for Net Use Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 744 I have just recently became an internet user, and found out today about the cowardly way the phone companies slivered to you without letting someone know what was going on. This is absurd the telephone companies are making more than enough money on the over charging for our limited local service. As for hindering the telephone network how many times have you had a problem completing a local call? Me, I cannot recall one either. If the phone companies are allowed to charge internet users for a local call and nonusers are not, this sould be classified as discriminatory! We pay for the local service already and sometimes we have a second line for internet access. Don't penalize ous for something that is within our rights. From aria@sprintmail.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:13 1997 Return-Path: aria@sprintmail.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01194 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:13 -0500 From: aria@sprintmail.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22265; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:34:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailgate22-hme0.a001.sprintmail.com(205.137.196.54) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022263; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:33:58 -0500 Received: by mailgate22 (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id QAA19835; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:33:35 -0800 Received: from sdn-ts-001inindip15.dialsprint.net(206.133.101.34) by mailfep3-hme1 via smap (KC5.24) id Q_10.1.1.8/Q_8056_1_331627d7; Thu Feb 27 16:33:27 1997 Message-ID: <33162856.4073@sprintmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:35:34 -0500 Reply-To: aria@sprintmail.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-SI300B02 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Per min charge for internet usage Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 667 I find it an outrage that phone companies who already have a monopoly on local phone service, could even ask for a per minute charge for internet access. What difference is there betweeen someone talking on the phone for an hour or two (which we know in every house hold there are 1 or 2) and someone being on the net that same time. Futher unless you have 2 lines you will not be able to use your phone while you are on line. Therefore the phone company gets to sell more products, ie. a second line and or there answering service so people can get messages while still on line. It seems to me that the phone company just wnts it both ways. Sincerely S. Fallahi From KSKern@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:14 1997 Return-Path: KSKern@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01197 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:13 -0500 From: KSKern@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22240; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:32:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout10.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.25) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022238; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:32:40 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout10.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id TAA22843 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:32:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:32:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227193214_-1071934151@emout10.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Re: FCC Phone Charges w/docket # 96-263 Content-Length: 1726 I am writing in response to the proposal made by telephone providers to the FCC. I do not think it is in the best interest of the general public, nor is it in the best interest of the economy of the United States. The proposed "per-minute" charge scheme would be highly damaging to the fledgling economy developing across the computer networks in this country. It would also be harmful to researchers, students, and government agengies across the country and world-wide. If per-minute charges are allowed to be initiated, the effect would be a reduction of consumer interest, and a stagnation of academic progress and communications. I urge you to deny the proposal as it would deny many people the right to fast communications, as they would no longer be able to afford the charges. Many non-profit organizations and research groups would have a much more restricted access to this indispensable mode of communication. I urge you to do what is right for the general public of the United States, and for its many invaluable organizations. Please do not grant telephone providers' proposal as it is a monopolistic measure and would contribute to the rapid decline of services involved with the internet. You should consider how much economic damage this proposal will do to local access providers, major access providers (e.g. AOL), and universities as these groups attempt to develop and improve the communications and services provided on the internet. They would be hard pressed to deal with this new burden. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, K. Sean Kern From KittyPitt@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:14 1997 Return-Path: KittyPitt@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01200 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:14 -0500 From: KittyPitt@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22089; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:24:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout02.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.93) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022085; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:24:15 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout02.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id TAA06958; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:23:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:23:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227192346_207357596@emout02.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov cc: Docket.No.96-263@aol.com Subject: Per minute fees for use of internet Content-Length: 229 Please do not charge any extra fees for use of the internet/WWW. This would seriously hamper many of us from using the web. There is no good reason for it other than to increase profits for the telephone companies. Thank you. From leviski.sk@pg.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:14 1997 Return-Path: leviski.sk@pg.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01203 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:14 -0500 From: leviski.sk@pg.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22186; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:29:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from oldspice.pg.com(192.229.17.100) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022184; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:28:54 -0500 Received: by oldspice.pg.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id TAA29610 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:22:03 -0500 Received: by smtp400.pg.com via Worldtalk with X400 (3.0.4/1.64) id WT12378.1899; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:23:44 EST Date: 27 Feb 97 19:20:00 -0500 To: ISP@fcc.gov Subject: Comments Message-Id: Content-Length: 337 I don't believe the phone companies should be allowed to charge a per Minute charge for access to the internet on top of the charges we already incur to connect to our ISP. If the phone companies are hurting as much as they say they are why are they so actively advertising services for putting a second line into residential homes. From KittyPitt@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:14 1997 Return-Path: KittyPitt@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01206 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:14 -0500 From: KittyPitt@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22163; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:28:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout11.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.26) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022156; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:28:01 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout11.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id TAA14535; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:27:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:27:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227192736_1424451104@emout11.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov cc: Docket.No.96-263@aol.com Subject: Per minute phone charges for use of Web Content-Length: 464 From: Sheryl Gamble, 307 Ross Point Road, Post Falls, ID 83854 Please do not allow the phone companies to begin charging for use of the Web. It will seriously hamper use of the Web by many people. The information on the Web is an excellent source for children doing homework. Extra charges would jeopardize student usage as well as usage by other people seeking information. I sent an earlier E-mail but forgot to include my name and address. Thank you. From OlavHansan@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:15 1997 Return-Path: OlavHansan@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01209 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:15 -0500 From: OlavHansan@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22035; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:21:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout16.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.42) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022029; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:21:10 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id TAA24474 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:20:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:20:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227192013_-1842330551@emout16.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: OBJECT STRONGLY TO THIS PROPOSAL!!!!! Content-Length: 503 I just recieved notice that the phone companies are trying to soak me for more money for using my internet access! NO WAY NO HOW!!!!!!!!!! Please do not allow the fastest growing benefit that we have created practically in the history of mankind to be derailed by these greedy money grubbing sloths! The benefit of the Internet/WWW to the people of this planet is at stake, ie: educational, informational, recreational, entertainment, medicinal, etc...- ALL that the internet provides! Please.... From MegaHoss@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:15 1997 Return-Path: MegaHoss@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01212 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:15 -0500 From: MegaHoss@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA21904; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:15:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout02.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.93) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021900; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:14:54 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout02.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id TAA28733 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:14:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:14:32 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227191426_1249229998@emout02.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: What? Content-Length: 380 To whom it concerns, What is this I am hearing about a per minute charge for online service? If this is true I can tell you there will be millions of VERY unhappy people. This is just another way to try to get money for nothing. If this idea does go through I would guess that some law suits would be in order and I will be first in line!!! SAVE MY ONLINE!!!!!!!!!!! Aaron From sailorDDG22@msn.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:15 1997 Return-Path: sailorDDG22@msn.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01215 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:15 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA21954; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:17:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from upsmot01.msn.com(204.95.110.78) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021941; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:16:40 -0500 Received: from upmajb02.msn.com (upmajb02.msn.com [204.95.110.74]) by upsmot01.msn.com (8.6.8.1/Configuration 4) with SMTP id QAA24647 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:11:23 -0800 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 97 22:53:36 UT From: "Loren Morse" Message-Id: To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: RE: INTERNET USERS ALREADY PAY ENOUGH Content-Length: 687 The idea of increasing charges on a per minute basis is rediculous. Many of us who are everyday people cannot afford to pay on a per minute basis and would lose the ability to go on-line. If this is adopted and bussinesses have to pay higher costs, those costs will be passed on to the users and that is unfair. Please consider the long range effect this will have on the consumer and on-line advertisers. The cost is too great and the rates should stay the way they are. With all the users there are on-line these companies are making money and so is the advertisers etc; so why change a good thing. SINCERELY, Loren L. Morse A Microsoft Client and Internet Explorer user From Artistic.Impressions@postoffice.worldnet.att.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:11 1997 Return-Path: Artistic.Impressions@postoffice.worldnet.att.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01156 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:10 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA22853; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:08:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailhost.worldnet.att.net(204.127.131.34) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022846; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:08:45 -0500 Received: from [207.116.104.98] by mtigwc02.worldnet.att.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0613 ) with SMTP id AAA15320 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:08:21 +0000 Message-ID: <33165B29.6367@postoffice.worldnet.att.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:12:25 -0800 From: Melody & Carl Organization: Artistic Impressions X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02E (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: per minute phone charges Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 181 I am against the idea of allowing phone comapnies to charge by the minute for phone calls to and ISP. If they are going to bill by the minute, then it should apply to all calls. From rjms@ptdprolog.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:16 1997 Return-Path: rjms@ptdprolog.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01218 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:15 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA21996; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:18:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from srv1.ptd.net(204.186.0.131) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021991; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:18:26 -0500 Received: (qmail 18087 invoked from network); 28 Feb 1997 00:13:37 -0000 Received: from cs6-11.mah.ptd.net (HELO LOCALNAME) (204.186.10.91) by postoffice.ptd.net with SMTP; 28 Feb 1997 00:13:37 -0000 Message-ID: <33164DAE.3E7F@ptdprolog.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:14:54 -0800 From: "Ron,Marge, or Ted" Organization: n/a X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Win16; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Phone company charging to use internet! X-URL: http://home.ptd.net/~dbicht/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1163 I truly hope the FCC isn't seriously considering allowing the phone companies to charge extra when someone is using the line for internet use. I already pay a fee to them for unlimited use, a fee charged above and beyond the basic phone service. Since I already pay extra, what business or concern is it of their's if I'm using the internet or talking with a friend? In my area, there are phone companies who lure you in by offering free hookups for another phone line for internet users. So now there is a monthly charge on this extra line, and that's fine. But in no way should they be allowed to charge an additional fee just because I use the internet. It seems a little unethical to me, first they lure you in with special promotions, and then when they have you hooked they stick it to you. I understand President Clinton himself would like to see a computer in every home, especially for children. The internet is so useful for education that in no way should an extra tariff be allowed. Please don't let the phone companies stifle this wonderful tool. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Ron Sadusky Shenandoah, PA From Freebyhim@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:16 1997 Return-Path: Freebyhim@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01221 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:16 -0500 From: Freebyhim@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA21882; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:14:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout19.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.45) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021872; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:13:54 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout19.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id TAA27364 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:13:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:13:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227191307_-1373490085@emout19.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: telephone charge Content-Length: 631 to whom it may concern i allready pay a regular fee for my phone, they get that money even when i do not use my phone, like two week i am on vacation, they do not refund me for not using my phone a lot, so why should they be able to charge me more for using my phone with my computer, i feel it is unfair to allow the phone companies to charge for time i am on the internet, i pay them their monthly service fee,and my internet company a fee. this would be opening the door to larger fees that make a company that is allready being paid for a service able to charge more,. sincerely margie fulgenzi 2724 n. myrtle tempe, az 85281 From HZKE57A@prodigy.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:16 1997 Return-Path: HZKE57A@prodigy.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01180 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:12 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22371; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:41:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from pimaia4w.prodigy.com(198.83.18.139) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022366; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:40:58 -0500 Received: from mime4.prodigy.com (mime4.prodigy.com [192.168.254.43]) by pimaia4w.prodigy.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAC52566; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:39:41 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by mime4.prodigy.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id TAA109830; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:34:12 -0500 Message-Id: <199702280034.TAA109830@mime4.prodigy.com> X-Mailer: Prodigy Internet GW(v0.9beta) - ae02dm02sc06 From: HZKE57A@prodigy.com (MS KATHY R STRANC) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:34:12, -0500 To: wicca101@juno.com.Gloria.M.Torelll, wicca101@juno.com, hindsj@jcave.com, gbcathedu@connectinc.com, hmcl53a@prodigy.com, ISP@fcc.gov, jelarkin@micron.net, weasel13@juno.com.jayson.m.matuskaa, jobejo@juno.com, hindsj@jcave.com.John.Hindss Subject: NEW ID MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Length: 974 -- [ From: Kathy Stranc * EMC.Ver #2.5.3 ] -- Expanded recipient data: To: Gregory Gonce \ PRODIGY: (WSZK83A) To: Hawkbus@aol.com \ America On-Line: (HawkBus) To: HFLU28A (Unlisted Name) \ PRODIGY: (HFLU28A) To: James Hubbard \ PRODIGY: (RGAH40A) To: Janused \ America On-Line: (Janused) To: Jeff Labar \ CompuServe: (chronicwellness) To: Jennifer Jewell \ PRODIGY: (EESC22F) To: Joan Faus \ PRODIGY: (FTTQ09A) To: John Hurst \ America On-Line: (questsub) As you are all in my address book, I feel I should inform you, just in case you wish to send me something, my new address. Kathy Stranc, KRStranc@prodigy.com and VRNZ53A@prodigy.com are gone. New address is HZKE57A, no links to Web yet. HZKE57A@prodigy.com I will probably go in and get a web address that matches my old one, if I can. Love, Makiah, Kathy Stranc From pdmitch1@siu.edu Fri Feb 28 11:46:16 1997 Return-Path: pdmitch1@siu.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01224 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:16 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA21876; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:14:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from saluki-mailhub.it.siu.edu(131.230.252.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021874; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:14:08 -0500 Received: from 131.230.253.187 (port187.aixdialin.siu.edu [131.230.253.187]) by saluki-mailhub.it.siu.edu (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with SMTP id SAA02246; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:09:58 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <331624C9.5F52@siu.edu> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:20:28 -0600 From: "Percy D. Mitchell" Reply-To: pdmitch1@siu.edu Organization: Southern Illinois University X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: NO EXTRA Charges Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 858 I am writing to APPOSE the potential internet phone use surcharge being proposed by the telephone companies. I feel the internet is an important and growing sevice that is to utilized at the least possible cost to all. The information available is so vast and helpful, across almost any category you can imagine, the benefit to users is immesurable. If companies try to place more and more charges on the use of the net, the entire system will be able to be used only by those with enough surcharge money to use it. I think this is inherently a bad policy as part of the richest part of the internet, is it's almost infinite scope. It is important to curb those companies looking to make additional profit off of something that needs to be kept free of these types of additional charges here proposed! I strongly urge you to trash this harmful proposal. From jclausen@flash.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:17 1997 Return-Path: thestake@flash.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01227 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:16 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA21854; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:13:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from nexus.flash.net(208.194.223.12) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021847; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:13:12 -0500 Received: (from thestake@localhost) by flash.net (8.8.5/8.7.5) id SAA04726; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:13:58 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199702280013.SAA04726@flash.net> From: Jason Clausen To: isp@fcc.gov Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:01:44 -0500 Subject: RE:FCC Internet Access Charge Reform Content-Length: 1641 > > Dear FlashNet customer, > > We are writing you this to inform you of a very important matter > currently under review by the FCC. Your local telephone company has > filed a proposal with the FCC to impose per minute charges for your > internet service. They contend that your usage has or will hinder > the operation of the telephone network. > > It is our belief that internet usage will diminish if users were required > to pay additional per minute charges. The FCC has created an email box for > your comments; responses must be received by February 13, 1997. Send > your comments to isp@fcc.gov and tell them what you think. > > Alert everyone in your addressbook, and most importantly the subject > line should have "CC Docket No 96-263". FULL NAME AND ADDRESS SHOULD > ACCOMPANY THE EMAIL otherwise it will be deleted. Again, the email to FCC is > isp@fcc.gov > > More information can be found at the FCC website: > http://www.fcc.gov/isp.html > > Please forward this email to all your friends on the internet so all our > voices may be heard. > > Thanks for your time. > > ****************************************** > M. Scott Leslie > President - FlashNet Communications > a division of WebSite Management Co., Inc. > ****************************************** What exactly do you mean by "per minute charges"? I hope this doesn't mean that the phone company will be charging more for my phone call to this modem, than for a phone call to a person in the same area. please respond. If this is the case, I shall consider whether or not I wish to keep the internet service. Thank you. Jason Clausen From SEVENLOVE@msn.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:17 1997 Return-Path: SEVENLOVE@msn.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01230 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:17 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA21771; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:08:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from upsmot03.msn.com(204.95.110.85) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021767; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:08:26 -0500 Received: from upmajb06 ([204.95.110.89]) by upsmot03.msn.com (8.6.8.1/Configuration 4) with SMTP id QAA23849 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:02:31 -0800 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 97 00:05:35 UT From: "CLYDE CAPPS" Message-Id: To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Internet Content-Length: 102 I believe the internet should be free from the Phone company charge. Clyde E Capps sevenlove@msn.com From Carcarepln@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:17 1997 Return-Path: Carcarepln@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01233 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:17 -0500 From: Carcarepln@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA21559; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:57:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout18.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.44) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021556; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:56:41 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout18.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id SAA08491 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:56:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:56:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227185613_1880218386@emout18.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: added charges, why? Content-Length: 359 It has been brought to my attention that the phone companies are asking the FCC to OK a program for charging all internet users a by the minutes charges for using the web. I would think doing this would cause myself and others to quit the web habit all together. There by burning our bridge to future. Mark L. Smith P.S. Ignore this message if in error. From crestwel@flash.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:18 1997 Return-Path: crestwel@flash.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01236 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:17 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA21507; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:54:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from endeavor.flash.net(208.194.223.40) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021499; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:53:37 -0500 Received: from crestwel (pm5-159.flash.net [208.194.192.159]) by endeavor (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA19757 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:50:26 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199702272350.RAA19757@endeavor> From: "Timothy Crestwell" To: Subject: Additional charges for the Internet. Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:41:20 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 289 I is a shame that the phone companies want to try and stick there greedy little hands in everyone pot. first the phone industry, the the cable industry, and now the Internet Access. When is the FCC going to draw the line. can someone please tell me that. Internet User crestwel@flash.net From Tim_Grindheim@ptieng.procom.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:18 1997 Return-Path: Tim_Grindheim@ptieng.procom.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01239 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:18 -0500 From: Tim_Grindheim@ptieng.procom.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA21509; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:54:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from ni1.ni.net(192.215.247.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021500; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:53:51 -0500 Received: from notes1.procom.com (notes1.procom.com [206.16.199.115]) by ni.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA05050 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:53:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by notes1.procom.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.05 (274.9 11-27-1996)) id 8825644B.0082D4E6 ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:49:01 -0700 X-Lotus-FromDomain: PROCOM To: isp@fcc.gov Message-ID: <8825644B.00826C4D.00@notes1.procom.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:48:55 -0700 Subject: per minute charges Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Length: 346 I have heard that multiple phone companies are proposing per minute charges for Internet Usage. Is this true ? This is ridiculous !! Internet lines are no more expensive than talking to my brother on the phone !!!! What kind of scam are we facing now ? I would love to hear an explanation on this ludicrous proposal. Tim_g@procom.com From Thraxxus@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:18 1997 Return-Path: Thraxxus@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01242 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:18 -0500 From: Thraxxus@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA21386; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:48:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout12.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.38) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021380; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:48:07 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout12.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id SAA04635 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:47:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:47:44 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227184658_951601661@emout12.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: FCC Minute Charges Content-Length: 561 I believe that minute charges, even one time Charges, on Internet Service is Outrageous and an impingment on my civil liberties. I am sure that 99.9999% of all people on the Internet would disagree and challenge this proposition. I am one of the few who have received word about this proposal and am shocked that the telephone companies would try to sneak in under the wire, just to make a profit. Well I for one will not stand for this, and this letter proclaim my discontent and objection to the proposal. Thank You for your time. A concerned internet User From kc6mvg@juno.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:18 1997 Return-Path: kc6mvg@juno.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01084 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:03 -0500 From: kc6mvg@juno.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id VAA24200; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:23:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from m7.boston.juno.com(205.231.100.196) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma024196; Thu, 27 Feb 97 21:22:40 -0500 Received: (from kc6mvg@juno.com) by m7.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id VdV18439; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 21:16:30 EST To: n1esw@juno.com Cc: fred.barkeram@bbs.com, debbie.cappella@wang.com, sjcappell@aol.com, w6qca@compuserve.com, ab6qt@amsat.org, help@aesham.com, basil-2@juno.com, kr6k1@juno.com, n0nsv@amsat.org, isp@fcc.gov, w6fe@pacbel.nse, maritimeCA@aol.com, wc0m@juno.com, daveleas@utma.com, delab@minot.com, ag6u@msn.com, watsonpaul@msn.com, n6wuq@gate.w6ue.ampr.org, n6wuq@juno.com, rlpschell@juno.com, wa6vfs@juno.com, sheble1@msn.com, posys@pacbell.net, snyder@snydersmart.com, dmes@juno.com, ac6kr@juno.com Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 20:12:08 CST Subject: w9fqn@juno.com (Stanley E Rohrer): FCC & Internet Charges Message-ID: <19970228.201020.2743.0.KC6MVG@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 1.15 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-7,12,18-22,26-27,30,35,37,41,44-49,53,59,64-77 Content-Length: 3387 CAPT.R.E.CAPPY CAPPELLA MYLO NORTH DAKOTA,U.S.A. E-MAIL KC6MVG@JUNO.COM FAX. 701-656-3367 UNITED STATES MERCHANT MARINE PACIFIC --------- Begin forwarded message ---------- From: w9fqn@juno.com (Stanley E Rohrer) To: LYA@juno.com, n6fmk@juno.com, kc6mvg@juno.com, jcarter@owl.csusm.edu,joe@sd.inri.com, rdavis@qualcomm.com, rdenny@4dcomm.com,ac6v@ix.netcom.com, daved@cts.com, mwd@gerry.palomar.caltec.edu,david_drake@smtpgate.Mitchell.com, ke@voa3.VOA.GOV, PMEverett@aol.com,mkfisher@ix.netcom.com Cc: nsg77@aol.com, rgonsett@connectnet.com, bhaineau@cts.com,catlady9@ix.netcom.com, DavidH@orie.cornell.edu, WA6WZO@arrl.org,EKTP68A@prodigy.com, cynthiah@student.umass.edu, whoover@tiac.net,73712.2152@CompuServ.com, W6TFB@juno.com, 76770.3123@CompuServe.com,ish1935@aol.com, JKuivinen@aol.com, cnfelfe@msn.com, pleonel@telis.org Subject: FCC & Internet Charges Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:39:40 EST Message-ID: <19970227.144057.14318.4.W9FQN@juno.com> NOT SURE IF YOU HAVE SEEN THIS BUT IT WAS SENT TO ME THE 26TH AND MIGHT WANT TO BE WORTH YOUR CONSIDERATION IN AN ATTEMPT TO AT LEAST SLOW DOWN WHAT IS HEADED OUR WAY ..I ALSO LEAVE THE LOGIC OF THE SITUATION UP TO YOU. HERE IS WHAT I RECEIVED ...... Friends: there's a very important movement afoot by the phone companies to make ISP providers pay up to 90 cents a minute for Internet use. See NY Times of Feb. 8, 1997, "FCC Considering Access Fees for ISPs." The second paragraph of that article says that the FCC is considering imposing a per-minute, per customer fee on Internet service providers who offer dial-up connnections to customers thorugh modem-equipped phone lines." That sounds like us. That sounds like more money to the likes of Ma Bell and a lot of money out of our pockets to communicate. The FCC needs to hear from us on this. I wrote the FCC today. Please send in your comments to the FCC which has invited people to comment on the issue until March 24. This is a complicated issue (download the article and read it), but the idea of imposing such fees sounds ominous. It may not start out at 90 cents, but once they start on the upward slope of fees per minute, you know there's no limit. THE EMAIL ADDRESS IS: isp@fcc.gov EXAMPLE: "I understand local telephone companies are filing proposals with the FCC to impose per minute charges for internet service. They contend that customer usage has or will hinder the operation of the telephone network. The truth is that the phone company is in a panic that the internet is becoming a competitor, i.e., make a local call to internet then use the internet to have voice mail to anywhere in the world at minimal cost---undercutting the phone company profits. The phone companies technology is outdated and will be replaced by internet type connections. The only question is when. If they win, the public loses. It seems that the FCC is in a position to foster the future or safeguard the past. I hope you will look forward to what can be rather than protect what will become antiquated technology. Please reject these proposals and guarantee the public's access to this new medium. Yours truly, CHARLES M. SEVILLA" Chuck Sevilla Cleary & Sevilla, LLP cleasev@millennianet.com Telephone 619 232 2222 1010 Second Ave., Suite 1601 San Diego CA 92101-4906 --------- End forwarded message ---------- From did1007@flash.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:19 1997 Return-Path: did1007@flash.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01245 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:18 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA21388; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:48:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from endeavor.flash.net(208.194.223.40) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021381; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:48:11 -0500 Received: from dianepag (ipm1-22.flash.net [208.194.205.22]) by endeavor (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA17622; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:45:00 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <33161CD6.7D8E@flash.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:46:30 -0600 From: jay Hatfield Reply-To: did1007@flash.net Organization: DiJay, International X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-FlashNet (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov CC: docket#96-263@fcc.gov Subject: phone charges for internet access Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 457 This is to notify you of my opposition to this proposal. I pay a monthly fee for a phone line with unlimited usage. If I wanted to stay on the line and talk to my friend for hours on end, or my daughter doing the same(as she is wont to do)has not been a problem up to this point. The fact that I am now talking to my friends over the internet should make no difference. Thank you for your consideration. Jay Hatfield 2802 N. Surrey Carrollton, Tx. 75006 From revkev24@earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:19 1997 Return-Path: revkev24@earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01248 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:19 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA21279; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:39:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from sweden-c.it.earthlink.net(204.250.46.50) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021272; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:38:54 -0500 Received: from 153.34.196.185 (Cust57.Max30.San-Francisco2.CA.MS.UU.NET [153.34.196.185]) by sweden.it.earthlink.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA26391 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:37:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <33159CB1.1761@earthlink.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:39:52 +0100 From: Kevin Clarke Reply-To: revkev24@earthlink.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: NO on per-minute charges Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1605 I am writing in response to the proposal made by telephone providers to the FCC. I do not think it is the best interest of the general public, nor is it in the best interest of the economy of the United States. The proposed "per-minute" charge scheme would be highly damaging to the fledgling economy developing across the computer networks in this country. It would also be harmful to researchers, students, and government agengies across the country and world-wide. If per-minute charges are allowed to take effect, the effect would be a reduction of consumer interest, and a stagnation of academic progress and communications. I urge you to deny the proposal as it would deny many people the right to fast communications, as they would no longer be able to afford the charges. Many non-profit organizations and research groups would have a much more restricted access to this indispensable mode of communication. I urge you to do what is right for the general public of the United States, and for its many invaluable organizations. Please do not grant telephone providers' proposal as it is a monopolistic measure and would contribute to the rapid decline of services involved with the internet. You should consider how much economic damage this proposal will do to local access providers, major access providers (e.g. AOL), and universities as these groups attempt to develop and improve the communications and services provided on the internet. They would be hard pressed to deal with thisnew burden. Thank you for your time and consideration, Sincerely, Kevin Clarke revkev24@earthlink.net From BPerk90308@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:19 1997 Return-Path: BPerk90308@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01251 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:19 -0500 From: BPerk90308@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA21234; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:35:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout06.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.97) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021232; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:35:04 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout06.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id SAA00603 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:34:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:34:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227183439_542877968@emout06.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Legislation Content-Length: 479 Dear Sirs: I have recently heard that the telephone companies are lobbying for legislation that would a per minute additional rate for internet users This would defeat the purpose of making the Web available to individual users including teachers, students, and retired persons all of whom do not have much income to spare for additional taxes which is what this would really be. Please deny this rate increase. Sincerely, Barbara M. Perkins From jglembot@slonet.org Fri Feb 28 11:46:20 1997 Return-Path: jglembot@slonet.org Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01254 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:19 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA21268; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:38:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from oso.slonet.org(207.114.180.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021266; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:37:50 -0500 Received: from default (tsc5-110.snlo.dialup.slonet.org [206.190.92.110]) by oso.slonet.org (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA15269; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:33:33 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199702272333.PAA15269@oso.slonet.org> From: "Edward Glembotski" To: Cc: Subject: Phone charge Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:38:06 -0800 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1157 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 284 Dear People, I am 76yrs. old and as such am having a limitation of outlets. One of them is the internet. I understand there is a move by phone companies to start charging users an additional per minute fee. I sincerely hope you do not permit this additional cost. Edward Glembotski From FA94@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:05 1997 Return-Path: FA94@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01117 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:05 -0500 From: FA94@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id UAA23576; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:45:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout10.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.25) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma023570; Thu, 27 Feb 97 20:45:13 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout10.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id UAA22700 for isp@fcc.gov>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:44:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:44:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227204449_-837244574@emout10.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Internet surcharge Content-Length: 66 Please do not let phone companies charge for the use of Internet. From dalton@isidis.colorado.edu Fri Feb 28 11:46:23 1997 Return-Path: dalton@isidis.colorado.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01257 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:20 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA21207; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:34:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from vaxf.colorado.edu(128.138.129.9) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021196; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:33:38 -0500 Received: from isidis.colorado.edu by VAXF.COLORADO.EDU (PMDF V5.0-6 #18298) id <01IFX0MDM0DC000EKD@VAXF.COLORADO.EDU> for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:19:50 -0700 (MST) Received: by isidis.colorado.edu (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) id AA07505; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:32:48 -0700 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:32:48 -0700 From: dalton@isidis.colorado.edu (lizard man) Subject: Internet Telephone Charges To: isp@fcc.gov Message-id: <9702272332.AA07505@isidis.colorado.edu> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-Length: 1986 I feel that the proposal to charge per-minute fees for Internet access is the most disgusting attempt to "cash in" on the freedom of information that is the Internet so far. Internet users will not stand for this any more than they sat back and allowed discussions to be censored or the government to limit access. If these fees go through, Internet usage will drop off dramatically, since nobody wants to pay for what has been a free service for two decades. I have always had Internet access, continuously, since the early 80's, and i have been using modems since the 70's. Never have i had to pay for any of these calls: charging customers more to use the Net than for a normal telephone conversation of the same duration is ridiculous, as both utilize identical resources. Since i have had my access through schools, Universities, and government organizations like NASA and the US Geological Survey, i know that even though i won't be DIRECTLY affected, the costs will go to the government (and university) internet providers, and then onto the taxpayers. Which includes yourself, you who are reading this. If i need to work from home, i am going to be charged for this? Then why work at home? No, the entire idea is simply stupid and greedy, and past experience shows that hackers will be resourceful enough to circumvent it, causing entirely new problems. Leave Internet access alone, the phone companies are LYING if they say the Net costs them more. There is no difference between a half-hour local call for conversation, and a half-hour local call for email. The only difference, actually, may be that one is a more efficent utilization of resources. Why should higher efficiency cost more? Please reject the current proposals for per-minute Internet access charges. Remember, anybody with home Internet access is ALREADY being charged a monthly fee, which is prohibitve to many anyway. --James Dalton 2003 Grove #10 Boulder CO 80302 dalton@isidis.colorado.edu From swilliam@seidata.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:24 1997 Return-Path: swilliam@seidata.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01260 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:23 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA21156; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:31:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns1.seidata.com(206.160.242.33) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021153; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:31:18 -0500 Received: from NEC (sunman-7.seidata.com [206.160.243.136]) by seidata.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA12721 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:30:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3316441E.4DE1@seidata.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:34:06 -0800 From: Steve Williamson Organization: SEI Data X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02E-KIT (Win95; U; 16bit) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ISP@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 742 Dear FCC; This letter is to protest the proposed additional per minute charges requested by the telephone companies. It is our belief that Internet usage will diminish if users were required to pay additional per minute charges. Your agency is supposed to protect the consumers not the telephone company. It could hurt or destroy many small business' as well as deprive children in schools of their access to Internet resources and interactive projects. It will hurt all Americans. The only beneficiaries would be the telephone companies. Thank you for your consideration of this letter while making your decision. Steve & Lisa Williamson P.O. Box 57 212 Vine Street Sunman, Indiana 47041 (812)623-2639 swilliam@seidata.com From TDowns5664@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:24 1997 Return-Path: TDowns5664@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01263 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:24 -0500 From: TDowns5664@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA21092; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout12.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.38) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021089; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:26:59 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout12.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id SAA15217 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:26:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:26:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227182629_1215668647@emout12.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: re:internet access rates Content-Length: 993 I am writing concerning docket numbers,96-262,94-1,91-213, and 92-253. Being newly retired , I decided to buy a computer and learn about many different things on the internet and America Online our online service provider. My wife and I have had many hours of enjoyment in the last three months with this new found entertainment. Now, I understand the local phone companies are unhappy that they aren't getting enough money and want rates increased for usage. They never cared before when the ladies talked for hours on the phone or when the internet first got rolling. Now , since deregulation the Baby Bells etc. see they have missed the boat on a money making opportunity. The FCC has the power in it's hands to destroy the Internet growth by allowing local phone service providers to charge per minute rates for the internet. I only hope you realize how important this issue is and resist the pressure of any telephone companies to discriminate against certain uses of the phone lines. From putz@beagle.colorado.edu Fri Feb 28 11:46:24 1997 Return-Path: putz@beagle.colorado.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01266 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:24 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA20989; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:19:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from beagle.colorado.edu(128.138.212.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020984; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:18:59 -0500 Received: from beagle (putz@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beagle.colorado.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5/Unixops/Hesiod/(SDM)) with SMTP id QAA02277; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:07:42 -0700 (MST) Sender: putz@beagle.colorado.edu Message-ID: <331613BD.2C05@beagle.colorado.edu> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:07:41 -0700 From: Eric Putz X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; SunOS 5.4 sun4m) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov CC: ix@netherworld.com Subject: Internet ISP Per Minute Access Charges: NO! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 92 Telephone and media monopolies have got to stop. Don't hurt the pioneers. e. -- Eric Putz From jdKING@concentric.net Fri Feb 28 11:46:25 1997 Return-Path: jdKING@concentric.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01269 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:24 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA21014; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:20:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from darius.concentric.net(207.155.184.79) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma021008; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:20:22 -0500 Received: from cliff.cris.com (cliff.cris.com [199.3.12.45]) by darius.concentric.net (8.8.5/(97/02/12 3.22)) id SAA02697; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:20:00 -0500 (EST) [1-800-745-2747 The Concentric Network] Errors-To: Received: from cnc109037.concentric.net (cnc109037.concentric.net [206.173.42.37]) by cliff.cris.com (8.8.5) id SAA28899; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:19:58 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199702272319.SAA28899@cliff.cris.com> Reply-To: jdKING@concentric.net Date: 2/27/1997 18:14 From: Golden Wolf Subject: VERY IMPORTANT Apparently-To: Content-Length: 137 Please do not allow telephone companies to charge minute rates on internet access. Doing this may bring the internet to its downfall. From WBooth7225@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:25 1997 Return-Path: WBooth7225@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01272 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:25 -0500 From: WBooth7225@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA20938; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:17:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout05.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.96) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020932; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:17:20 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout05.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id SAA05911 for ISP@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:16:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:16:57 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227181654_1947322944@emout05.mail.aol.com> To: ISP@fcc.gov Subject: PHONE BILL Content-Length: 244 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, THE PHONE COMPANY ALREADY CHARGES ENOUGH MONEY FOR PHONE SERVICE AND IF THEY ADD A COST FOR ON LINE,YOU WILL LOSE ALOT OF PEOPLE.PLUS THE ON LINE SERVICE ALREADY CHARGES A FEE ALSO. NO NEED TO CHARGE US MORE!!!!!!!!!!!! From mlmckenzie@juno.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:25 1997 Return-Path: mlmckenzie@juno.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01275 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:25 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA20902; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:14:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from x16.boston.juno.com(205.231.101.28) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020900; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:14:32 -0500 Received: (from mlmckenzie@juno.com) by x16.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id SZJ20225; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:12:24 EST To: isp@fcc.gov Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:07:28 PST Subject: Internet Charge Message-ID: <19970227.180729.11078.0.mlmckenzie@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 1.00 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 5-6 From: mlmckenzie@juno.com (Michael L McKenzie) Content-Length: 394 More fees for internet use only will only hinder development. If phone companies need more dollars for new and additional lines, then charges should be on the customer using the line for internet purposes. Fees stacked onto fees through middlemen will only abrogate the problem by wasting money not specifically meant for physical plant and infrastructure upgrades. Michael L. McKenzie From fkj4-ms-lp@emh6.korea.army.mil Fri Feb 28 11:46:25 1997 Return-Path: fkj4-ms-lp@emh6.korea.army.mil Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01278 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:25 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA20912; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:15:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:15:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from emh3.korea.army.mil(143.138.10.20) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020906; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:15:16 -0500 Received: from [144.59.253.52] by host.emh3.korea.army.mil id aa12977; 28 Feb 97 8:01 KST X-Sender: kschramm@143.138.10.40 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.1.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@fcc.gov From: MAJ Kathy Schramm Subject: Phone Charges Message-ID: <9702280801.aa12977@host.emh3.korea.army.mil> Content-Length: 637 I realize this is past your deadline, but I still felt a need to let my voice be heard. I hope you have denied the request by phone companies to charge by the minute for access to the internet. If an internet provide pays for local or 800 service for their customers to contact them that is all the phone companies should profit from. If you allow local phone companies to start charging by the minute for access to the internet you will discourage use of the internet and open the door for increased phone charges, i.e., by the minute for all local service. I strongly oppose this move by telephone companies. Kathryn J. Schramm From emmett@xmission.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:26 1997 Return-Path: emmett@xmission.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01281 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:26 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA20779; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:09:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.xmission.com(198.60.22.22) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020773; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:09:09 -0500 Received: from xmission.xmission.com (heber1.modem.xmission.com [204.228.140.201]) by mail.xmission.com (8.8.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id QAA14804 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:08:34 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <33161313.5AAA@xmission.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:04:51 -0700 From: Adele X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Surcharges Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 76 I oppose the petition to ISP access surcharges!!!! Francis E. Higgins, CPA From Rzross@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:26 1997 Return-Path: Rzross@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01284 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:26 -0500 From: Rzross@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA20864; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:13:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout18.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.44) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020860; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:13:22 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout18.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id SAA01483 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:12:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:12:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227181256_-837258546@emout18.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Internet Service Charge? Content-Length: 254 You gotta be kidding. I'm a voter and I will vote no for every incumbent whether they're for or against this if this thing passes. That's it. Short and sweet. Please pass this along to whomever would be interested. Thank You, Randy Ross Rzross@aol.com From llowry@jeffnet.org Fri Feb 28 11:46:27 1997 Return-Path: llowry@jeffnet.org Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01287 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:26 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA20862; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:13:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from jeffnet.org(204.203.90.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020859; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:13:16 -0500 Received: from ip208.jeffnet.org (ip208.jeffnet.org [204.203.88.208]) by jeffnet.org (8.8.0/8.8.0) with SMTP id PAA00331 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:25:22 -0800 Received: by ip208.jeffnet.org with Microsoft Mail id <01BC24C0.42C29360@ip208.jeffnet.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:09:43 -0800 Message-ID: <01BC24C0.42C29360@ip208.jeffnet.org> From: Loni Lowry To: "'isp@fcc.gov'" Subject: Internet Access Charges Docket 96-262, 94-1, 91-213 and 96-263 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:09:39 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 307 We vehemently oppose adding per-minute access charges for use of the = Internet. It will stifle use of a burgeoning new way of sharing = information, thereby reducing international productivity. It is not a = good idea! Sincerely, David and Loni Lowry 4100 Payne Road Medford, OR 97504 From boblewis@cet.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:27 1997 Return-Path: boblewis@cet.cet.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01290 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:27 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id SAA20762; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:08:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from cet.cet.com(206.96.91.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020752; Thu, 27 Feb 97 18:08:46 -0500 Received: from boblewis.cet.com (spk-102.cet.com [206.96.90.102]) by cet.cet.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA26677 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:08:30 -0800 Message-ID: <331613AA.4F0E@cet.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:08:05 -0800 From: BOB LEWIS Reply-To: boblewis@cet.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket # 96-263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 917 I wish to thank you for this opportunity to express my oppinions on this subject. I believe that the local phone companies love any oportunity to increase there income. I have a separate line for which I pay an extra $15 dollars a month. I use this line less than 1.5 hours per day. I mainly need the line for infrequent incomming fax messages and short periods of internet use. I am certain many people use their home lines far more than that. I believe it is unfair for the local phone companies to try and jump on the bandwagon and suck more money from the community. Maybe what we really need is fiberoptic service directly to each home and bypass the phone companies switching equpment entirely. Then we wouldn't need them at all. Maybe that is what they are afraid of "PROGRESS". Thank you again. Bob Lewis 105 W. Florence Ave. Spokane, WA 99218 e-mail ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:27 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA20511; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:58:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from hot.hotcc.com(205.129.154.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020502; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:58:24 -0500 Received: from 3D (hot16.hotcc.com [205.129.154.16]) by hot.hotcc.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA13366 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:57:32 -0600 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:57:32 -0600 Message-Id: <199702272257.QAA13366@hot.hotcc.com> X-Sender: parsec@hotcc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@fcc.gov From: parsec@hotcc.com (Raum Bances) Subject: per min. prices... Content-Length: 1314 To whom it may concern, I got this address from my sister who filled me in on the per minute priceing. My name is Raum Bances and I have a fair ammount of experience with electronics, computers, business, and the internet. The phone companies are just sore because the world found a way to beat their rediculess priceing on long and short long distance calls and they want a piece of the action. If you are familiar with automobile technology, you may remember a time when a carberator that ran on water was designed in the sixties. The patent was bought out by Holley high performance automobile company, and never continued-- "It would not be profitable." We now find ourselves in a time where clean air and natural resources are getting scarce. If all large companies are allowed to rule the world by proffit and not greater good, the end of the world it truely coming. God would not have to destroy us, byt mearly sit back and watch us destroy ourselves. I am an Army reservist now, after serving 8 years of active duty. I believe in serving the greater good, but I don't believe in being abused by "Big Business." Please use what abilities you have to prevent this type of mooching of the public. Thank you for your time. Raum Bances Video GraffX Nashville, TN From John_Flannery@compuserve.com Fri Feb 28 11:46:28 1997 Return-Path: John_Flannery@compuserve.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01296 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:27 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA20430; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:53:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from arl-img-1.compuserve.com(149.174.217.131) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020424; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:53:17 -0500 Received: by arl-img-1.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515) id RAA23396; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:52:48 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:52:40 -0500 From: John Flannery Subject: OPPOSED: Bill to add surcharge to internet use To: "isp@fcc.gov" Message-ID: <199702271752_MC2-11D2-A53D@compuserve.com> Content-Length: 424 Please be aware that I and my wife are opposed to any litigation that would add surcharges for internet use. We believe the internet is a valuable resource in communication and the education of children. As such, it's use should not be artificially constrained by the government for any purpose, including the gratification of large telephone companys. John and Virginia Flannery 3 Pleasant Street Burlington, CT 06013 From vrnrn@atlsysnet.com Fri Feb 28 11:47:03 1997 Return-Path: vrnrn@atlsysnet.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01299 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:46:28 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA20491; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:57:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from nop3.ainop.com(206.139.121.6) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020485; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:57:37 -0500 Received: from mast28.ainop.com [206.139.120.236] (HELO DEFAULT) by nop3.ainop.com (AltaVista Mail V1.0/1.0 BL18 listener) id 0000_0050_3316_11f8_4816; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 18:00:08 -0500 Message-ID: <331639D7.357E@atlsysnet.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:50:15 -0800 From: Virgina Nason X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01KIT (Win95; U; 16bit) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Billing Plans for Net Use Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 650 Dear Sir: I was very distrubed to hear that the phone companies are trying to impose a per minute fee for internet users. They need to update their technology rather then try to interfer with new technology. Why do those who have made bundles of money for years , want to ruin a good thing for the common person. I am a nurse, support myself, and make no where near the salary these big phone executives make. It seems to me they could leave us little fellows a lone and let us enjoy a little bit of the good life. Virginia Nason vrnrn@ainop.com From kinnan@uiuc.edu Fri Feb 28 11:47:04 1997 Return-Path: kinnan@ux9.cso.uiuc.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01302 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:03 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA20469; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:56:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from ux9.cso.uiuc.edu(128.174.5.39) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020464; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:56:24 -0500 Received: (from kinnan@localhost) by ux9.cso.uiuc.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA11245; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:55:57 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:55:56 -0600 (CST) From: Jeffry Kinnan X-Sender: kinnan@ux9.cso.uiuc.edu To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Formal Comment Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Length: 731 Dear Sir, I believe that the implementation of timed rades for internet use would negatively affect the development of the internet and would affect new technologies of the future such as cable throught the internet and other such new inventions. Also, the new charges that internet service providers would be passed on to the consumer and would limit the use of the information superhighway. For these reasons, I believe that internet service providers should continue to be charged on a per-line basis as they are now rather than by the minute. Thank you for your time. My address is included in the lines below. Jeffry Wayne Kinnan 1112 Old Fence Road Addison, Illinois 60101-1134 e-mail: kinnan@students.uiuc.edu From joelrb@execpc.com Fri Feb 28 11:47:04 1997 Return-Path: joelrb@execpc.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01305 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:04 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA20419; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:52:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailgate.execpc.com(169.207.16.5) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020415; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:52:44 -0500 Received: from mail.execpc.com (mail [169.207.16.2]) by mailgate.execpc.com (8.8.5/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA11321 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:52:21 -0600 Received: from joel (resh.execpc.com [169.207.9.122]) by mail.execpc.com (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id QAA20793 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:52:18 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <31338B96.2F40@execpc.com> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 16:54:14 -0600 From: joel X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: ISP acess charges Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1533 To:FCC From: Joel Blumenschein Re:Acess Reform Document In regards to the proposed rate increase/imposition on local Internet providers I would like to offer the following. First, the regional telephone companies have been for years charging a flat per month rate regardless of the usage. Because of this, they have been able to profit from the non use of their system. Now that the internet has become very popular, not only to the end user but as a business segment, the RBOC's who failed to comprehend the profit potential of the Internet are now, after the fact, trying to recoup lost profit and revenues. While I do see the position of the RBOCs' a per minute fee would cripple the Internet. As the President has stated in the past the Internet is part of the bridge to the future. By allowing the RBOCs to effectively charge a toll on this bridge, access will not be available at a reasonable rate not only to the public but to government as well. With all of the political outcry concerning budget problems you have the direct abibity to hold down government expenses as well as educational costs. One possible solution would be to allow the RBOCs to increase their flat monthly fees. As it has been demonstrated the RBOCs know when data is passing down their lines. If there was a Flat 25% increase on the monthlly charge everyone would benefit. The Tel Cos would have increased revenues for improvement of their system and the ISPs' would know their fixed costs. Thank you for your time Joel Blumenschein From smith3@digitalwebsat.com Fri Feb 28 11:47:04 1997 Return-Path: smith3@digitalwebsat.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01308 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:04 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA20299; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:46:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(207.238.82.11) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020292; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:46:31 -0500 Received: from mail1.digitalwebsat.com by mail1.digitalwebsat.com (NTMail 3.02.10) with ESMTP id fa001435 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:43:52 +0000 Message-ID: <33160DED.4E0C@digitalwebsat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:42:54 -0600 From: Smith3 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Telephone per minute charge Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 838 Please look out for the individual and do not pass the per minute charge that phone companies are asking for in order to upgrade their equipment. The phone companies have budgeted for equipment upgrades. They are trying to get a foot in the door of the internet. If they want our business, let them upgrade, but don't make the consumer pay to make them competitive with other media like cable. The phone companies' have allowed their basic services to deteriorate since the AT&T monopoly was dissolved, allowing the various parts of AT&T to 'fool all the people some of the time and some of the people all the time. Let the phone companies provide internet access directly if they want a per minute charge. Let them compete with everyone else fairly. Thank you, Milton Smith 420 Third Street Aransas Pass, TX 78336 512 758-5519 From MJordan932@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:47:05 1997 Return-Path: MJordan932@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01314 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:05 -0500 From: MJordan932@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA19945; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:32:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout28.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.133) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma019940; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:32:32 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout28.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id RAA23964 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:32:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:32:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227173032_-1440485129@emout11.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: 2nd Request for Internet Fee Increase Content-Length: 252 To Whom It May Concern: I think it would be a huge mistake letting the phone put an access fee on internet use. It will be another example of the poor and middle-class not being able to enjoy the internet use. Michael Jordan MJordan932@aol.com From Vivase@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:47:05 1997 Return-Path: Vivase@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01317 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:05 -0500 From: Vivase@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA20073; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:37:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout18.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.44) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020069; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:37:17 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout18.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id RAA29022 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:36:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:36:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227173601_-1138747209@emout18.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: CC docket 96-263 Content-Length: 1177 Hello, My name is Michael and I wanted to write you about cc docket number 96-263. I would voice my oppisiton to this, this will be short and to the point. I don't make alot of money, now if this $1.00 surcharge is passed it will eventually filter down to us the consumer. Seeing as I live on my own, witch entails paying rent, utilities, car insurance ( since I am not 25 yet and I live in NJ it is quite high), and various bills I have very little money left(I almost forgot, food, I have to eat ya know). In addition, if you remember president Clinton said he wants every child to know how to get on to and know how to use the internet, how will this happen if this surcharge is imposed. It seems to me, if this surcharge is imposed, it will be like the same old thing, the rich people get the spoils and the hard working poor people of this country get stepped on. This surcharge is just another way for the capitalistic phone companies to get more money. Does the FCC and the phone companies really think we are that stupid to make us believe that extra and harder work go into the access for the internet. Wake up it is JUST A PHONE CALL. THANK YOU, Michael From 3810aston@umbsky.cc.umb.edu Fri Feb 28 11:47:06 1997 Return-Path: 3810aston@umbsky.cc.umb.edu Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01320 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:05 -0500 From: 3810aston@umbsky.cc.umb.edu Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA19785; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:25:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from gemini.cc.umb.edu(158.121.2.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma019779; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:25:38 -0500 Received: by umbsky.cc.umb.edu (MX V4.2 VAX) id 885; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:25:10 EST Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:25:05 EST To: ISP@FCC.GOV Message-ID: <009B085B.A2C7C940.885@umbsky.cc.umb.edu> Subject: Internet telephone charges Content-Length: 125 PLEASE prevent phone companies charging for intrnet calls. That will eliminate many of us on fixed incomes. Arlene C. Stone From JamRoseE@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:47:06 1997 Return-Path: JamRoseE@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01323 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:06 -0500 From: JamRoseE@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA19704; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:23:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout10.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.25) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma019699; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:23:09 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout10.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id RAA18960 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:22:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:22:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227171334_307214275@emout10.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: no, more charges Content-Length: 405 The thought of paying extra to the phone comany is atroshious. If the call is local no other charge should be applied, this is also true of the ATL line. This would probobly force the net to wilt for a while. No one in there right mind would pay more for sevices that should be provided. thanks JamieRose Endfinger From jjwedder@webaccess.net Fri Feb 28 11:47:07 1997 Return-Path: jjwedder@webaccess.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01326 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:06 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA19681; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:22:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from boris.webaccess.net(204.251.161.12) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma019671; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:22:32 -0500 Received: from jjwedder.webaccess.net ([204.251.161.57]) by boris.actnet.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-16334) with SMTP id AAA202 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:19:11 -0700 Message-ID: <331618AE.2B2B@webaccess.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:28:46 -0800 From: Jeremy Wedderburn X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I; 16bit) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: do not allow this to happen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 613 To Whom It may concern: Once again I can see that the phone company's are at it again, trying to take away what little freedom we have to communicate with other around the world while all the while trying to line their pockets with money. Have'nt they already taken enough of our money over the past years, why cant they just leave the Internet alone. Instead of the top management of these phone company making they million let them take a little pay cut. I beg you please do not allow this to happen, because not only will I suffer many other individuals would suffer. I Will write more a little later. JJW From vshroad@juno.com Fri Feb 28 11:47:07 1997 Return-Path: vshroad@juno.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01329 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:07 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA19719; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:23:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from x16.boston.juno.com(205.231.101.28) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma019711; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:23:44 -0500 Received: (from vshroad@juno.com) by x16.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id RwL20225; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:20:03 EST To: isp@fcc.gov Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:17:43 PST Subject: marykrause@juno.com (Mary Krause): cpambrose5@juno.com (Charles F Ambrose): Phone Co. rip-off Message-ID: <19970227.171745.2559.4.vshroad@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 1.00 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-1,4-10,13-27 From: vshroad@juno.com (Vincent J. ShroadJr.) Content-Length: 1267 --------- Begin forwarded message ---------- From: marykrause@juno.com (Mary Krause) To: SRBUSKIRK@aol.com, jh@meadow.brevard.K12.fl.us, ab985@seorf.ohiou.edu,lightbringer@juno.com, Murphyart@aol.com, naliq@aol.com,SEALGIRL@aol.com, vshroad@juno.com, MagPie3735@aol.com Subject: cpambrose5@juno.com (Charles F Ambrose): Phone Co. rip-off Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 14:00:45 EST Message-ID: <19970215.135523.4407.3.MaryKrause@juno.com> --------- Begin forwarded message ---------- From: cpambrose5@juno.com (Charles F Ambrose) To: bfrank@pacifier.com, JJolley-JADE-GA@worldnet.att.net, marykrause@juno.com,maureentassone@juno.com, kathytorma1@juno.com, dewiegner@juno.com Subject: Phone Co. rip-off Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 23:36:04 EST Message-ID: <19970214.232858.9039.0.cpambrose5@juno.com> The phone companies are asking the FCC to be able to add a per minute charge for signing onto the internet. Please e-mail to isp@fcc.gov and tell them how you feel about this. Even if the charge was a penny a minute...times 100 hours online per month your extra phone charge will be $60..Pass this around so the FCC will know how unfair this charge would be. --------- End forwarded message ---------- --------- End forwarded message ---------- Signed V. J. Shroad,Jr age 79 From Hsin@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:47:07 1997 Return-Path: Hsin@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01332 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:07 -0500 From: Hsin@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA19578; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:19:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout18.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.44) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma019572; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:18:50 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout18.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id RAA13624 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:18:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:18:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227171816_-1708142661@emout18.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: Phone Company Content-Length: 399 I undersand that telephone companies are trying to place a surcharge on AOL use claming that they are losing business. Well let me tell you. Before I had AOL my average long distance bill was $30.00. Now it is $250.00 because I meet people online and end up calling and talking to them. This is a very common with AOL users. Their long distance bills increase not decrease. Thank you for your time. From alchang@fairchild.lmco.com Fri Feb 28 11:47:08 1997 Return-Path: alchang@fairchild.lmco.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01335 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:07 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA19596; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:19:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from medusa_fast.fairchild.lmco.com(158.186.94.1) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma019585; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:19:15 -0500 Received: from alc by fairchild.lmco.com with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #9) id m0w0EA2-003E2fC; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:18 EST Date: Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:18 EST Message-Id: <2.2.16.19970227171857.11275e8e@fairchild.lmco.com> X-Sender: alchang@fairchild.lmco.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@fcc.gov From: Albert Chang Subject: Telephone Co. Charging for Internet Service Content-Length: 746 I wish to make my comments on our local telephone company charging for ISP service. I think this is unfair in that it will limit internet usage for most users. I do believe that internet does severely hinder the telephone service. This problem is extremely serious when ISP provides unlimited usage services. This is even a problem for ISPs. A perfect example is American OnLine. When the phone company charges 10 cents for untimed local calls and you add to it unlimited usage, users can log in all weekend. This especially true when the person has seperate phone line. I know people who does this. ISP should give generous usage for a base fee. Unlimited should have much higher fee to prevent this type of abuse. Al Chang Huntington, NY From dick@pobox.com Fri Feb 28 11:47:08 1997 Return-Path: dick@pobox.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01338 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:08 -0500 From: dick@pobox.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA19600; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:19:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:19:42 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199702272219.RAA19600@gatekeeper2.fcc.gov> Received: from babel.enteract.com(206.54.252.9) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma019587; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:19:26 -0500 Received: (qmail 19602 invoked from network); 27 Feb 1997 22:19:01 -0000 Received: from beelzebub-37.d.enteract.com (HELO 207.112.154.141) (207.112.154.141) by babel.enteract.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 1997 22:19:01 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: My Repeater,224.160 Mhz. (KA9OYO) is missing?? To: cberg@grayfox.svs.com, clark132@worldnet.att.net Cc: ka9oyo@aamerican.com, isp@fcc.gov, F#HAJEK@ccmail.ceco.com X-Mailer: SPRY Mail Version: 04.00.06.17 Content-Length: 2422 27 FEB - 1605 CST Hello Carl... Please check the database for the status of the KA9OYO 224.160 mhz repeater and advise Gregory Gately of its status. I suspect it may be in the "UNPUBLISH" list? I don't know why he CC'd the FCC without checking with us first. I am sure they are really thrilled to see this. They will have to generate a response to what I hope is nothing more than a routine inquiry brought about by Mr. Gately's failure to read in the newsletter that *ONLY* those repeaters on the PUBLISH list were listed in the newsletter. 73 - Dick, WD9GIG <---- Begin Forwarded Message ----> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 14:58:11 -0500 From: "The Gately's and or A-American.com" Reply-To: gately@aamerican.com To: "Bob Hajek, W9QBH (IRA Coordinator)" , "Carl Bergstedt, K9VXW (IRA Coordinator)" , "Chris Clark; KC9ZI (ACLR& IRA Coordinator)" , "Dick Isely, WD9GIG (IRA Coordinator)" CC: "Federal Communications Commission (GOV)" , "Ann L. Gately @ Motorola work." Subject: My Repeater,224.160 Mhz. (KA9OYO) is missing?? Dear Sirs: I received my first ever IRA Newsletter in the mail to day. I appreciate the newsletter, and noticed two things incorrect with in it. 1) My repeater, 224.160 Mhz. KA9OYO BSRC Brookfield, Il. was not listed in the database. Please update this listing. I have promptly returned your annual coordination surveys, and have copies to prove it. So their should be no reason that this repeater should still not be coordinated! This repeater is currently, and has been on the air, without absence since 1987. 2) You have an E-Mail listed for your Interference Problem chairman, Chris Clark, KC9ZI listed as clark123@worldnet.att.net. His actual E-Mail is clark132@worldnet.att.net. If you have any more questions or comments, you can call me at my listed phone number of (708) 387-7251. Or E-Mail me at mailto: ka9oyo@aamerican.com . Please respond with your conclusions. Either way, our repeater, 224.160 Mhz. will be there, ON-THE-AIR until the day I move, die, or the FCC takes away the 220 portion of the ham band (which will probably happen before the first two do). Sincerly; Gregory P. Gately, KA9OYO http://www.aamerican.com <---- End Forwarded Message ----> From CarloCord@aol.com Fri Feb 28 11:47:13 1997 Return-Path: CarloCord@aol.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01311 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:47:04 -0500 From: CarloCord@aol.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id RAA20122; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:39:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from emout12.mx.aol.com(198.81.11.38) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma020117; Thu, 27 Feb 97 17:39:36 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by emout12.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id RAA27727; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:39:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 17:39:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <970227173724_1424437821@emout12.mail.aol.com> To: isp@fcc.gov cc: rdeitz@errols.com Subject: phoneline usage/internet Content-Length: 424 I am opposed to a per minute charge for local phone line use for internet service. There must be other options to this situation. Please delay any laws and/or regulations that would impose such a charge until all options are identified and discussed. Only then can a non-rushed, educated and wel thought solution be made. Let the public have a say in this. We are the customers that pay the bills and use the services! From hglaw@access-one.com Fri Feb 28 11:48:02 1997 Return-Path: hglaw@access-one.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01342 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:48:02 -0500 From: hglaw@access-one.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA05749; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:48:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from access1.access-one.com(207.49.203.7) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma005738; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:47:59 -0500 Received: from MHS by access-one.com with MHS id AKCGAGCP ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:39:00 -0600 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:38:06 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Docket:NO. 96-262 & 96-263 To: isp@fcc.gov Content-Length: 156 Please keep access to the internet affordable to rural users. Do not allow phone companies to place a surcharge on phone lines accessing the internet. From dougvk@eps.mntm.org Fri Feb 28 11:48:04 1997 Return-Path: dougvk@eps.mntm.org Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01346 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:48:03 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA05759; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:48:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.mntm.org(207.40.156.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma005747; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:48:18 -0500 Received: from [208.10.16.145] by ns.mntm.org; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/30Oct95-1021AM) id AA23746; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 10:54:16 -0600 X-Sender: dougvk@eps.mntm.org (Unverified) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:49:18 -0600 To: ISP@fcc.gov From: dougvk@eps.mntm.org (Doug Van Kley) Subject: CC Docket No. 96-263 Content-Length: 762 This letter is to protest the proposed additional per minute charges requested by the telephone companies. It is my belief that Internet usage will diminish if users were required to pay additional per minute charges. Your agency is supposed to protect consumers not the telephone company. It could hurt or destroy many small business' as well as children in schools it will hurt all Americans the only beneficiaries would be the telephone companies." I am a teacher at a Public School and use of e-mail and the use of the internet is very valuable. The telephone companies are already making HUGE profits. The additional charges are not necessary Doug Van Kley Computer Teacher Edgerton, MN 56128 From nctrahan@Mickey.nat.k12.la.us Fri Feb 28 11:48:31 1997 Return-Path: nctrahan@Mickey.nat.k12.la.us Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01350 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:48:31 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA04733; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:15:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from alpha.nsula.edu(192.102.223.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma004701; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:15:02 -0500 Return-receipt-to: Reneva Trahant X-PMrqc: 1 Received: from mickey.nat.k12.la.us (mickey.nat.k12.la.us) by ALPHA.NSULA.EDU (PMDF V5.0-6 #15477) id <01IFY285WD5S009O46@ALPHA.NSULA.EDU> for isp@fcc.gov; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:16:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from MICKEY/MAILQUEUE by mickey.nat.k12.la.us (Mercury 1.21); Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:57:34 -0600 Received: from MAILQUEUE by MICKEY (Mercury 1.21); Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:57:30 -0600 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:57:27 -0600 From: Reneva Trahant Subject: new fcc e-mail regulations To: isp@fcc.gov Message-id: Organization: Natchitoches Central High School X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.52) Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Priority: normal X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Reneva Trahant" Content-Length: 941 To whom it may concern: The whole purpose of the Internet is the FREE and uninhibited exchange of information. Since I teach school, we have ( students and teachers) used the internet a great deal.....FREE! How will this affect the students who cannot afford to pay for internet use and e-mail on a per minute charge. Didn't our President, Clinton, have as one of the goals of the Department of Education free and unlimited access to the internet for ALL students??? The telephone companies apparently make a great deal of money and have spent a lot of it on trying to make more. I understand that this is the goal of an industry... to make money. But the scalping of people is totally unfair, expecially when it affects the low-income and middle income hard-working people the most. Please reconsider the proposal seriously...it could affect the people who need its use the very most!!! Sincerely, Mrs. Reneva Trahant From nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Fri Feb 28 11:48:31 1997 Return-Path: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01353 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:48:31 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id TAA22306; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 19:37:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from exodus.content.earthlink.net(206.250.94.3) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma022302; Thu, 27 Feb 97 19:37:00 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by exodus.content.earthlink.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA24782 for isp@fcc.gov; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:36:36 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 16:36:36 -0800 From: nobody@exodus.content.earthlink.net (SVR4 nobody uid) Message-Id: <199702280036.QAA24782@exodus.content.earthlink.net> To: isp@fcc.gov Reply-To: jallen@northrim.net Subject: Form Data from 206.206.31.101 Content-Length: 585 Date: Thu Feb 27 16:36:36 PST 1997 address = 2911 S. 2000 E. city = Wendell comments = This is an outrage. email = jallen@northrim.net name = Jerry Allen regarding = FCC Docket #96-263 state = Idaho statement = I understand the FCC has tentatively concluded that providers of information services (including Internet service providers) should not be subject to the interstate access charges that local telephone companies currently assess on long-distance carriers. I agree that Internet Service Providers should not be subject to the interstate access charges. zipcode = 83355 From jady@shana.com Fri Feb 28 11:51:06 1997 Return-Path: jady@mail.shana.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01357 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:51:05 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA05851; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:51:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from relay7.uu.net(192.48.96.17) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma005847; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:51:15 -0500 Received: from shana.com by relay7.UU.NET with ESMTP (peer crosschecked as: [199.185.237.2]) id QQcewh15632; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:50:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.185.237.134] by shana.com with SMTP (Apple Internet Mail Server 1.1.1); Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:57:12 -0700 Subject: Internet Charges Date: Fri, 28 Feb 97 09:50:41 -0000 x-sender: jady@mail.shana.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 1.1 From: John Ady To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <1354998664-127026740@shana.com> Content-Length: 812 To whom it may concern, Please note that I object to any charges levied by telephone companies for use by the internet. I feel it is nothing more than a money grab from a committed market, and will hinder future growth of the World Wide Web. This in turn will stifle many efforts underway to stimulate the economy by means of the internet by reducing exposure to many companies worldwide. Regards, John Ady National Accounts Representative ========================================================================== Shana Corporation Phone (403) 433-3690 x277 9744-45th Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6E 5C5 Fax (403) 437-4381 jAdy@shana.com http://www.shana.com ========================================================================== From hepfer33@juno.com Fri Feb 28 11:52:07 1997 Return-Path: hepfer33@juno.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01361 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:52:07 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA05915; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:52:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from m11.boston.juno.com(205.231.100.194) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma005907; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:52:22 -0500 Received: (from hepfer33@juno.com) by m11.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id L^Y19798; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:50:10 EST To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: charge per minute on internet service Message-ID: <19970227.235215.5351.0.Hepfer33@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 1.15 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-1,12-15 From: hepfer33@juno.com (Charlotte A Hepfer) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:50:10 EST Content-Length: 745 Dear sirs: As I understand the fcc is trying to propose a fee for using thte internet per minute,I would just like to say what a blessing it is to be able to keep in contact with my son who is in the Air Force stationed in Germany,I think this would be very unfair especially for the men and women in the military stationed so far away from home,this gives them a sense of being at home with keeping up with what is going on with the family,some are unable to go to other Countries to see their loved ones when they are there four years or longer and this keeps them in touch,especially the e-mail.I hope you will consider what this will do to the military and the internet that keeps them so close to home even being so far away. Thank You From spearsn@texas.net Fri Feb 28 11:56:38 1997 Return-Path: spearsn@texas.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01371 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:56:38 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA06089; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:56:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail1.texas.net(207.207.0.34) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma006083; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:56:54 -0500 Received: from LOCALNAME (dnet01-12.sat.texas.net [206.127.4.12]) by mail1.texas.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA04511 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:56:24 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <331729BE.328@texas.net> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:53:50 -0800 From: Noa Spears X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Win16; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: No charges at retail level for internet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 288 Re: CC docket No. 96-263; from: Noa Spears; 121 E. Mariposa; San Antonio, TX 78212. E-mail: spearsn@texas.net No monetary charge should be allowed for the individual's use of phone lines, cable or satelite, or other wired or wireless means of connection to the internet, world-wide. From wcarpent@mail.tds.net Fri Feb 28 11:57:08 1997 Return-Path: wcarpent@mail.tds.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01375 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:57:08 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA06107; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:57:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.tds.net(204.246.1.2) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma006099; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:57:05 -0500 Received: from novt1-a05.nfld.tds.net (novt1-a05.nfld.tds.net [204.246.12.38]) by mail.tds.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA13995 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:56:35 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:56:35 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199702281656.KAA13995@mail.tds.net> X-Sender: wcarpent@kear.tdsnet.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@fcc.gov From: Walter Carpenter Subject: PLease Deny the Phone Companies Per Minute for the INternet Content-Length: 1202 Dear FCC: I wish I could address this to a person directly involved in the phone company hearings about the internet. If the phone companies succeed in charging us by the minute, no one will be able to afford using the internet anymore. I work on the net, and my business would collapse out from underneath me if the companies succeed in getting the per minute rate charge. The phone companies are already getting paid handsomely by the internet. The local service providers are paying the phone companies some nice royalties for use of the phone lines, as well as other amenities. I beg you to please not let the companies get their per minute charges. That would destroy what the internet is. The telephone companies are, themselves, getting onto the net bandwagon to make more profits for their companies and shareholders. This charge would ruin it for everyone except the phone companies themselves. Please, deny this request on behalf of those of us who need the internet now. Sincerely, Walter Carpenter Box 163 Walterbury Center, Vt 05677 Voice: Vt (802) 229-1650; Fax: (802) 229-1650 Voice: NH (603) 526-9219 e-mail: support@netapproach.com From hglaw@access-one.com Fri Feb 28 11:59:08 1997 Return-Path: hglaw@access-one.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01381 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:59:08 -0500 From: hglaw@access-one.com Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA06159; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:59:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from relay3.uu.net(192.48.96.8) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma006157; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:59:23 -0500 Received: from access-one.com by relay3.UU.NET with SMTP (peer crosschecked as: access1.access-one.com [207.49.203.7]) id QQcewh02289; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:58:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from MHS by access-one.com with MHS id AKCIANCD ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:50:22 -0600 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:40:12 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Docket:NO. 96-262 & 96-263 To: isp@fcc.gov Content-Length: 156 Please keep access to the internet affordable to rural users. Do not allow phone companies to place a surcharge on phone lines accessing the internet. From reb@terraworld.net Fri Feb 28 11:59:12 1997 Return-Path: reb@terraworld.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA01380 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:59:08 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id LAA06161; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:59:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from sol.terranet.net(206.53.116.66) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma006148; Fri, 28 Feb 97 11:58:56 -0500 Received: from [206.53.116.215] by sol.terranet.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-16231) with SMTP id AAA229 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:01:18 -0600 Message-ID: <33170ECD.48D1@terraworld.net> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:59:17 -0600 From: "Brandenburg, Robert" Reply-To: reb@terraworld.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Macintosh; I; PPC) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: FCC96-488 Docket #96-263 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 337 Please by advised of my strong objection to the proposed internet usage fee by telephone companies. The Internet is needed to promote communication and especially education. This would be curtailed by adding a fee. Also, those of us who do genealogy via internet would be harmed by this fee, as we often use quite lot of air time. From callen@alpha.informatics.net Fri Feb 28 12:01:39 1997 Return-Path: callen@alpha.informatics.net Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA01426 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:01:38 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id MAA06240; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:01:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown(204.233.67.251) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma006238; Fri, 28 Feb 97 12:01:48 -0500 Received: from alpha.informatics.net by alpha.informatics.net (NTMail 3.02.10) with ESMTP id sa005556 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:59:24 -0600 X-Sender: callen@204.233.67.251 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: isp@fcc.gov From: Charlie Allen Subject: Docket 96-262 & 96-263 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 10:59:24 -0600 X-Info: http://www.informatics.net Message-Id: <16592432103412@informatics.net> Content-Length: 296 I am writing to protest STRONGLY any efforts to allow the phone company to add additional charges per minute for Internet access phone lines. In small communities like I live in, it would makie it almost prohibitively expensive for Net access. C. Allen Abilene, Ks. RE: Docket 96-262 & 96-263 From jrudisill@juno.com Fri Feb 28 12:11:15 1997 Return-Path: jrudisill@juno.com Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov (firewall-user@internet2.fcc.gov [165.135.0.253]) by www2.fcc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA01509 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:11:14 -0500 Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id MAA06510; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:11:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from m2.boston.juno.com(205.231.101.199) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via smap (V3.1.1) id xma006507; Fri, 28 Feb 97 12:11:24 -0500 Received: (from jrudisill@juno.com) by m2.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id McM10583; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:08:53 EST To: isp@fcc.gov Subject: re: phone line usage charge to connect to the internet Message-ID: <19970228.100928.3254.0.JRUDISILL@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 1.15 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-1,4-5,14-15,22-29 From: jrudisill@juno.com (JIM RUDISILL) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:08:53 EST Content-Length: 1305 Dear FCC Regarding the above attempt by the Telephone companies around the USA to charge additional charges for connecting to the internet over there telephone lines. Telephone companies say they are out of phone lines. However, they continue to offer promotions to hook up additional lines for Computer fax, modems, and access to the internet. It appears they need the new business for additional profits. The lines we have added are just sitting there 24 hours a day waiting to be used. There is already an additional charge for phone lines with unlimited usage. They set the fees they charge. If you want the line you have to pay there price. There is no bargaining for the individual with the phone company. Pay their price or you don't get it. An additional charge for usage because it's being used to access the internet is not justified. It is just another poor excuse for wanting more profit to use for investments in other than telephone related properties. U.S. West has become a company more interested in outside (other than Telephone Service) investments. They use the phone line charges as a vehicle to obtain more money to invest in their other interest. Please DO NOT grant them permission to add charges for Internet service. Thank you. Jim Rudisill jrudisill@juno.com