From: William Hastback [wghastba@gw.dec.state.ny.us] Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 4:06 PM To: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov Subject: Regarding FDA Docket No. 02N-0278 Regarding FDA Docket No. 02N-0278 Proposed Section 307 (Prior Notice of Imported Food Shipments) - requires that prior notice of food shipments be given to FDA. The notice must include a description of the article, the manufacturer and shipper, the grower (if known), the country of origin, the country from which the article is shipped, and the anticipated port of entry. The Secretary, through FDA, must issue final regulations by December 12, 2003. It seems unlikely that FDA could possibly have enough resources to enforce such regulations. At present FDA and Customs are almost completely ineffective in preventing raw or frozen molluscan shellfish products exported by non-MOU nations from entering the U.S. Dozens of shipments of molluscan shellfish enter the U.S. weekly, if not daily, from China and other countries that have not signed a memorandum-of-understanding with FDA agreeing to implement their shellfish sanitation program in a manner that assures a level of public health protection equivalent to that of the National Shellfish Sanitation Program (NSSP) of the United States. This failure to prevent the entry of tons of such molluscan shellfish products from non-MOU countries occurs despite FDA's own seafood HACCP regulations (21 CFR Parts 124 and 1240) adopted in December 1995. Said regulations clearly specify that shellfish that do not originate from an MOU country, or which cannot be proven to be produced in a manner equivalent to the NSSP, are defined by those regulations as adulterated and will be denied entry. Yet tons of such shellfish from many such countries is routinely NOT being denied entry, even when FDA knows that the country of origin is a non-MOU country and/or when no credible evidence is produced that the shellfish were produced in accordance with the HACCP regulations adopted in 1995. Apparently, FDA counsel is of the opinion that FDA's own regulations are so impotent that FDA cannot deny entry to such adulterated products. FDA's feeble effort to curtail the distribution of shellfish from non-MOU countries is to ALLOW it into the country and then ask the various states' shellfish sanitation programs to embargo the product. FDA does this knowing full well that states' shellfish and enforcement programs are nearly all operating at the limit of their resources. In fact, FDA's most recent program evaluation report found one northeastern state's shellfish enforcement program element to be nearly out of compliance with the requirements of the NSSP, yet it continues to allow shellfish from non-MOU countries into that state and hopes that state can embargo and destroy such adulterated product, creating additional work for that state's shellfish enforcement unit. If FDA cannot enforce its current regulations that apply only to seafood and molluscan shellfish, which make up but a small percentage of the foreign foods entering the U.S., even when those foods are adulterated under its own regulations, how will the new proposed regulations, Section 307 (Prior Notice of Imported Food Shipments), which govern an even broader spectrum of food products which may not be adulterated, ever be effectively enforced by FDA ? William Hastback 6 River Heights Drive Smithtown NY 11787