What are the factors responsible for the higher rates of morbidity and mortality among men? Beliefs about masculinity and manhood that are deeply rooted in culture and supported by social institutions play a role in shaping the behavioral patterns of men in ways that have consequences for health. Men are socialized to project strength, individuality, autonomy, dominance, stoicism, and physical aggression, and to avoid demonstrations of emotion or vulnerability that could be construed as weakness.37,38 These cultural orientations and structural opportunities combine to increase health risks.
Marginality and the Absence of Work
Given Western culture’s socialization of men to accept norms that emphasize achievement and competence, men often feel pressure to ensure economic survival, and their traditional sense of self often includes success at work and being a good provider. Since the early writings of Karl Marx and Max Weber, sociologists have long noted the centrality of work to well-being.
39 Men are often judged on the basis of their occupational status. Accordingly, the economic marginalization of men can have long-term negative consequences for their health.
Men are overrepresented in a broad range of stigmatizing social conditions, such as incarceration, homelessness, unemployment, and institutionalization for substance use and severe mental illness, that reflect social exclusion and separation from the labor market. Eighty-nine percent of the over 600 000 jail inmates and 94% of the 1 million prisoners in state and federal penitentiaries are men.40 Men are also more likely to be homeless, and to be homeless for longer periods of time than women.41,42 Individuals who have less education, who have mental health and substance abuse problems, and who had been incarcerated also tend to be homeless longer than persons without those characteristics.42 Over 1 million clients received treatment at drug or alcohol treatment facilities in the United States in 1998, and 69% of them were men.40
Over the last 50 years, the unemployment rate has been twice as high for African American men as for their White counterparts, and the unemployment rate for African Americans and Hispanics tends to rise more during economic recessions.33 During the last half of the 20th century, labor force participation rates (employed or actively seeking work) declined in general for men and markedly for African American men.33 Among men aged 16 to 24, African Americans are 2.4 times as likely, and Hispanics are 1.8 times as likely, as Whites to be neither employed nor in school.33
Current trends suggest that the challenges for men with employment security are likely to worsen. The share of workers who are employed by temporary agencies has been growing in recent years, and the number of poverty-level and low-wage jobs is also on the increase.43 Relatedly, there is a global expansion of precarious employment.44 Precarious employees are part-time and temporary workers, workers subject to organizational change (workplace restructuring, downsizing, privatization, and corporatization) that leads to job losses and job insecurity, workers in outsourcing and home-based arrangements, and employees of small businesses.
Between 1973 and 1996, these changes in the nature of work led to stagnation or decline in the wages of men in the bottom two thirds of the income distribution, even as overall per capita income was increasing.45 Importantly, precarious employment is associated with worsening occupational health and safety in terms of injury rates, disease risk, and hazardous exposures.44 Poor African American and Hispanic men are also employed disproportionately in jobs with higher rates of layoffs and lower rates of reemployment after job displacement.21
Research reveals that unemployment and job insecurity are associated with elevated rates of stress, illness, disability, and mortality.40 Some of these effects are evident as soon as employees perceive that their jobs are threatened, with persons who are laid off reporting higher levels of stress, illness, and disability than those who keep their jobs.43 A study in Harlem showed, for example, that men who were not employed, who had a history of not having steady work, and who had a history of homelessness were more likely to be hypertensive and more likely to smoke than men who worked full-time and who had steady work.17
Health status changes for men following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 dramatically illustrate how economic marginality can adversely affect health. In the wake of increased inflation, unemployment, and reduced wages,46 life expectancy for men in Russia declined by 6 years between 1991 and 1994.47 The increases in mortality were largest for middle-aged urban males in manual occupations and for those with the lowest levels of education.47
Work Conditions and Stress
A growing body of research also indicates that the quality of employment affects the health status of men. Men tend to work in more dangerous jobs than women, and men represent 90% of job fatalities.
37 Occupational disease is responsible for an estimated 860 000 illnesses and 60 300 deaths annually.
48The specific conditions of work that are more likely to lead to poor health are the combination of high job demands with little control over them49 and the combination of high levels of effort with low levels of reward.50 Persons who have low occupational status at work often face elevated levels of stress in nonwork contexts as well.51 Moreover, the combination of these 2 sources of stress with other risk factors, such as social isolation and poor diet, can lead to altered functioning of neuroendocrine stress pathways that can adversely affect health.51
Stressors and the negative emotional states created by them can also lead to health behaviors such as impaired sleeping patterns, decreased physical activity, increased substance use, and the consumption of more food than usual, all of which can increase the risk of chronic diseases.52 In the Whitehall Study, good health practices were positively associated with occupational grade, but health behaviors accounted for only a small part of the variation in heart disease risk for men.51 In contrast, perceptions of control in the workplace accounted for more than half of the variation in the incidence of heart disease.53
Desirable occupational opportunities are differentially distributed by race. Relatively high percentages of White and Asian men are employed in managerial and professional occupations, while African American, Hispanic, and American Indian men are overrepresented in lower-skilled and lower-paid occupational categories such as operators, fabricators, and laborers.33 Since the 1970s, earnings for low-skilled men have deteriorated markedly. The African American, Hispanic, and American Indian men who are overrepresented at the low end of the earnings distribution have also been disproportionately affected by the earnings decline.33 The jobs in which low-SES men in general and minority males in particular are disproportionately concentrated are jobs that are characterized not only by low levels of income but also by high levels of stress (high demands and effort with low control and rewards).
Minority men also tend to be concentrated in jobs that pose high levels of exposure to pathogens in the physical environment. For example, agriculture is one of the most hazardous employment sectors for occupational injuries and deaths, and agricultural employers are exempted from many government workplace regulations that apply to other industries.54 Men in general, and Hispanic men in particular, are overrepresented among hired farm workers in the United States. Sixty percent of farm workers earn so little that their families live in poverty. Similarly, even after education and job experience are adjusted for, employed African Americans are more likely than their White counterparts to be exposed to occupational hazards and carcinogens.55,56
Personal Health Practices
Beliefs about masculinity and manhood can lead men either to take actions that harm themselves or to refrain from engaging in health-protective behaviors. Women are more likely to engage in a broad range of preventive and health-promoting behaviors than men, while men are more likely to engage in over 30 behaviors that have been shown to increase the risk of morbidity, injury, and mortality.
37 For example, compared with women, men are more likely to smoke cigarettes (26% vs 22%) and twice as likely to consume 5 or more drinks of alcohol in a single day.
11 At the same time, men are more likely to engage in leisure-time physical activity (65% vs 59%) and less likely to be overweight than women (21% vs 26%). Importantly, engaging in risky behavior, declining to take part in health-promoting activities, and claiming that high-risk behaviors (e.g., alcohol drinking) will not impair performance (e.g., driving) are often demonstrations of the norms of masculinity in the larger culture, and ways in which men construct and reinforce their masculinity.
37Gendered Responses to Stress and Coping
Differential exposure to stressors and responses to them also contribute to the health challenges that men face. Stress has been shown to have long-term negative consequences for a broad range of health outcomes, including mental health, susceptibility to infectious diseases, and risk of chronic conditions such as diabetes and hypertension.
52 Women are more exposed to stress than men,
38 but some evidence suggests that men may have higher levels of employmentrelated stress.
57,58 Moreover, women may employ more effective coping strategies, especially for interpersonal stress. Across multiple animal species and many human societies, females are more likely than males to seek social support, especially social support from other females in response to stress.
59 Compared with men, women seek more support, receive more, are more satisfied with the support that they receive, provide support more frequently, and are more effective in the provision of support.
59,60Cultural scripts that contribute to gender differences in responses to stress also lead to gender differences in specific types of illness. Although there are no gender differences in the overall prevalence of psychiatric disorders, women in many societies have higher rates than men of internalizing disorders (feelings are focused on self) such as depression and anxiety, while men have higher rates than women of externalizing disorders (emotions are expressed in outward behavior) such as alcohol, drug abuse, and antisocial behavior.60
Substance use (tobacco, alcohol, other drugs) is one externalizing coping response to high levels of stressors. People often turn to alcohol and drugs to escape adversity and numb the pain of negative social and economic conditions. Research from animal and human studies indicates that stress is a major contributor to the initiation of substance use and to the continuation of addiction to alcohol and other drugs, as well as to relapse.61 Exposure to stress may also underlie the pattern of racial differences in substance use over the life course. African American adolescents have lower levels of use of marijuana, alcohol, cigarettes, and binge drinking than Whites and Hispanics.62 However, although African American adolescent substance use begins at later ages, once initiated, heavy use continues for a longer time.21 The transition to adulthood for African Americans may be associated with heightened awareness of restricted opportunities that may lead to increased levels of stress in early adulthood and maladaptive patterns of coping.
The greater proclivity of men to use alcohol and drugs as a strategy to cope with stress is costly to them individually, as well as to their families and society. A comprehensive report on substance abuse outlined several reasons why it is America’s number one health problem.63 First, alcohol is a central cause of premature mortality and a major contributor to deaths from cirrhosis of the liver, accidents, suicide, and homicide—the causes of death where gender differences are most marked. Alcohol is responsible for almost half of cirrhosis deaths, traffic fatalities, and other accidents.
Second, the use of illicit drugs also has a marked effect on the health of men, especially minority men, through deaths directly related to illegal drugs, as well as through associated conditions such as HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, tuberculosis, falls, motor vehicle accidents, and homicide. Third, in addition to being a serious financial drain on a family, substance abuse is also a major cause of family problems, including divorce, separation, marital violence, child abuse, emotional and adjustment difficulties for children, and the increased risk of children, especially boys, becoming a substance abuser as an adult.
Fourth, substance use has a major impact on increasing health care costs. It is estimated that 25% to 40% of all general hospital patients are hospitalized because of complications related to alcohol use. Fifth, substance use is also a major determinant of crime. At least half of all persons arrested for major crimes such as homicide, theft, and assault were using illegal drugs at the time of their arrest and about half of the persons convicted of violent crime were under the influence of alcohol or drugs at the time the crime was committed. Finally, substance abuse often leads to lower levels of income and occupational mobility. Moreover, compared with Whites, African American and Hispanic adolescents and adults experience higher levels of the negative mental, physical, and social consequences of substance use even when their overall levels of use are lower than or similar to those of Whites.62
Use of Health Services
The male tendency to suppress the expression of need and minimize pain may also be reflected in lower male engagement in preventive health care visits.
37 These differences in use of care can importantly contribute to differences in health outcomes. In 1999, men were almost twice as likely as women (23% vs 12%) not to have visited a doctor, and 69% of women aged 18 to 64 had a dental visit compared with 60% of similarly aged men.
11Men also tend to have lower levels of adherence to medical regimens than women.64 These differences are pronounced for vulnerable subgroups of men. Compared with their higher-SES peers, low-SES men have lower levels of health information, and individuals dealing with high levels of stress tend not to make prevention and management of chronic disease a priority.52,65 Moreover, high levels of stress have been shown to reduce the efficacy of many pharmacological agents.66 Not surprisingly, African American men aged 18 to 49 have the lowest rates of awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension of all age, race, and gender groups in the United States.64
Health care institutions and practitioners also respond differently to men and women. For example, in the emergency room, men with depressive symptoms (inconsistent with gender norms) are more likely to be hospitalized than women with the same symptoms, and women with antisocial behavior or substance use problems are more likely to be hospitalized than men presenting these symptoms.60 In addition, compared with Whites, minority men and women receive less intensive and poorer-quality medical care for a broad range of medical conditions.67
There are also large gender differences in the typical medical encounter. Health care providers spend less time with men than women; provide them with fewer services, less health information, and less advice; and are less likely to talk about the need to change behaviors to improve health.37 One study found that physicians were 3 times more likely to routinely provide instruction to age-appropriate women on breast selfexamination (86%) than to age-appropriate men on testicular self-examination (29%).68
Cumulative Adversity Over the Life Course
Many of the risk factors considered here co-occur and lead to a pattern of cumulative disadvantage over time. That is, social and economic disadvantages are key determinants of health throughout the life course. Receiving a poor education, having high rates of unemployment and underemployment, being stuck in dead-end jobs, residing in a bad neighborhood, and having high job insecurity and poor-quality housing are multiple disadvantages that tend to be concentrated among the same individuals and households, and their effects tend to cumulate on health over time.
69,70The forces that affect the health of adult men often begin early in childhood. Early childhood exposure to poor social and economic conditions not only adversely affects child health and growth, but it sets the child on a low education and economic trajectory that increases the risk of poor physical and mental health in adulthood.71 For example, high rates of unemployment, poverty, violent crime, incarceration, and homicide among African American adult males reflect the cumulation of disadvantage at multiple transition points during their development.
Iron deficiency, fetal alcohol exposure, low birthweight, and exposure to lead are examples of conditions during infancy and childhood that contribute to poor health by placing the child on a trajectory of poorer cognitive functioning and low educational performance.21 There are marked SES and racial/ethnic differences for all of these factors. The experience of early abuse is another risk factor in childhood and adolescence that has pervasive adverse consequences. Abuse in childhood predicts poorer school achievement in childhood and adolescence and lower educational and occupational attainment in adulthood.72 Adolescent victims of abuse have lower educational aspirations and efforts as well as lower educational attainment, occupational status, and earned income as adults compared with individuals who did not experience abuse.72 Moreover, victimization in adolescence is predictive of future violent and nonviolent criminal behavior and substance use.72
Thus, growing up poor is associated with multiple adversities that lead to less readiness for school and poorer school achievement. There is little variation in parents’ expectations and aspirations for their children, even in the most economically disadvantaged neighborhoods.73 However, there are large variations in the availability of resources and in parents’ knowledge and expertise in navigating the social system to maximize opportunities for their children. There are also large variations in the quality of schools.74 High-risk children are more likely than others to attend poor-quality schools in disadvantaged neighborhoods where their vulnerabilities are further reinforced. These schools have more deteriorated buildings, fewer qualified teachers, more limited curricula, little serious academic counseling, fewer connections with colleges and employers, and higher levels of teen pregnancy.
These conditions can give rise to peer pressure against academic achievement and in support of crime and substance use. This combination of student and school characteristics leads to higher rates of dropping out of school and inadequate preparation for college and the labor market for those who remain in school.71 The path toward lower socioeconomic attainment and poor health status is further exacerbated by the structure of the labor market. In the last 4 decades, there has been a large out-migration of high-pay, lower-skilled jobs from the urban areas where poor African Americans are concentrated.75,76 The absence of employment opportunities for males leads to high rates of male joblessness, and prospects of low earnings in the legal job market can enhance the attractiveness of illegal activities.
Research reveals that the economic marginalization of African American males (high unemployment and low wage rates) is the central determinant of the high rates of female-headed households among African Americans.77–80 In 1960, two thirds of African American children were living with both parents, compared with 38% in 1999.81 In contrast, 82% of Asian children, 78% of non-Hispanic White children, 63% of American-born Hispanic children, 73% of foreign-born Hispanic children, and 55% of American Indian children lived with both parents in 1999.82 Male labor market earnings are the largest source of household income in the United States.33 Thus, the combination of low earnings for African American males with low pay for African American women leads to high rates of poverty for African American children.
Research reveals that levels of supervision of children are lower in single-parent households.80 For both African Americans and Whites, being raised in a single-parent home is the key determinant of increased risk of juvenile delinquency and participation in violent crime.80 Moreover, compared with children raised by 2 parents, those raised by single parents are more likely to grow up poor, drop out of high school, and be idle during their late teens and less likely to enroll in college.83
McLoyd and Lozoff21 further indicate that marked increases in African American male violence in recent decades coincided with increases in unemployment, the percentage of young African American male high school dropouts with no reported earnings, the use and trafficking of crack cocaine, and declines in the real earnings of young African American males, absolutely as well as relative to Whites. These processes unfolded in areas of concentrated poverty that were created by larger societal policies,84 at the same time that there was a shift in federal drug policy and a decline in federal spending on drug treatment.21 Moreover, aggressive and discriminatory mandatory sentencing of African American males for drug crimes85 removes a high proportion of African American men from the community and keeps them from providing economic and social support to families and children. A criminal record, in turn, reduces the chances for future employment.
Thus, racial differences in crime, unemployment, and single-parent households are not driven by differences in family values but by lifelong interactions of coping responses with restricted access to good neighborhoods, schools, and employment opportunities.