*Eo i 27 LRAJI-ED ST.,tI-ES (;QV.LE-N-NI @iN -L L@ E t),LAt L ".L 't L C SER%'ICE TO BEMI-I I)ATE: FR,6'f Act Associate Director for.G@-ant and Conurac'L. Policy, DE.IP SUBJF@c-T: irierrora-ndu-,,i Recordin-F, Ilational Advisory Council actions on Regional f,',Iedi-@ pro@@- Applications 'the individual n heet e s s) The attached r,@erriora-ndLu. rep]-aces emos (PL@l L,h.11 os-. It will also become part two of the previously used for ' s purp the Council we-@tinS at which the actions were taken. minutes ol specific conditions relative to Details of t he recommendations and any --the aiiard are contained in the blue sheets. In a few instances in which so-,Pe further detail is reoulred the G--@ts iRevie-@i Braxich is preparing ard i-jill distribute shortly, addenda uo the blue sheets. -ind that these are '- e re-o --.-Please bear in @ kh - .77,-enr-lati-Ons of the Co,-mci and have no a(i@isi@.rat-@Lve re,-@l,t.',cti-ons 6r--Ibo@@-a 11 be different in aLl:,-,os@u all cases. Doctor Olson vlr4r. L--@%,is' Doctor Chad@iick Mr. Jones Doctor Sloan 14r. Friedlander Mr. Chambliss 14r. 'I'-horner Doctor Tmboden fix. -Peterson Doctor r@,@?-ier-@old Mr. Hilsen-roth Doctor Mr. Cavarocclu Yiiss Conrath Mrs. Silsbee Mr. La;,iton Doctor David 3 T c X VDAL@ L A A .0-11 I 28, 1969 DATE: Feb Director ruarjr Division of Rea onal fledical Provrams IFR6Nf Acting Associate Director for' Grant and Contract Policy, DPU@F suBjy.cr: Recordin,- of the actions taken by the National Advisory Coancil, on -Regional @'4edical Programs applications considered by them at the meeting on February 20 and 21,,1969 mended and commented uoon, I. Approval, as requested, and as recom by the Revie,,ti Co i,@ttee: 'LA!-IP,P,E V@TT?Y GREALr-r'ER D@, 0 al Ol-$587 631; 02-$619,734; 03-$629,627. @lOi-t: The -peratior Council requested that staff be-assured of the -ion @budgetinc- details on project #4, and that the rec. be urged to arrive at a satis.-Lactor-y cooperative inter-re-ionil arrancpr,,en'u- with the iNe,,v Jersey Rec-ional Medical Program. Plannin,.- Aoproval for extension of the conritrrent for two additional --.years, at the present annual level to be airarded as the operational core. LOUISIPI,,TA oi-$425,300;.02-$400,186;-03-$412 181 INDIANA oi-$82.)036; 02-$88,850 -I/ All amunts are direct costs only and,unless otherwise specified,'. refer to 12 month period,@z The desi&ia@ions 01, 02, etc., relate to the first, second, etc., budc,,et@, per-,ods of 'the subjec@u aoo'i-'Lca'uion Inot necessarily the budo@' u pe.L-lods ,-fl-lich they !.-,r i- "Ll actually supple,@nt. "IASTE 5 UCTIO@4 PROG.IA@A -MICHIGAN ol-$492135 GFORGT-A -ith bude;e uo 9,818 (this si t b@' dedfor a 15-mont Oi- -x mot 02-$659,414 $502407; 02-$145,207; 03-$144,572 MOUWALN STATES 04-$27910372 05-$273,252 ol@$256,537; 02-$247,463; 03-$272,30I.;' IMDIOIS Ol-$184, 500; 02-$P505000; 03-$270,000 SUSQ@-\ZTA VALIFY 2169.1 Ol-$129,742 :'2/69.2 Ol-$231,175 (Nine months only) -2/69.3 ol-$169,202;.o2-$44,ol4; 03-$45,614 .II Approval,'in part' as specifically recommended and commented on' UP by the Revie@ti Cornmittee ALABXIA 2169.1 = Ol-$256,683; 02-$188,500 2/69.2 = 01-Y "5112,369; 02-$42L[.1617 NORTT=:-,.N.l ETC- LA-',! D 01-7$728,727; 02-$705,727; 03-$700,727 -3- 1129; 03-$1,394,962 -$1,3863 oi-$1,306,934; 02 OHIO STATE 2258; 03-$55,572 oi-$1572890; 02-$134 -$839,205 only); 02-$13@011,159; 03 ten rionths ol-$l"20113 123 (Core for HAVLkii 03@-$30,000; 02-$303000 MISSOURI nly@ -_2/69.i. oi-$3.,400.,OOO N@i -council recommended the one year 0 with decision on subsequent years to. made f olloTt7ino, the site visit. be 03-$36.,o84 2/69.2 Ol-$743532; 02-$36io8O; JEJ YORK -$372 of which $60,0(0 is reserved); 02 333 Ol-$3703000 $376,335 8i7-1-1--- 02@$156,957; 03-$ll 0-T,.TV07@MIG OLOROO I'lly-C ol-$127,801; 02-$223,312.; 03-$242,5;'O KANSAS ,017 2'-9; 03-$361.,789; 04-$1411 2/69.1 and 2/69.2 ol-$396,230; 02-$3593 MAIME 017$500,245; 02-$493@6011; 03-$5521865 @HIS Ol-$49,900; 02-$26,88'i;' 03-$20,343 D. C. 149MOPOL-TTPII 02-$737)6011; 03-$739,1145 TE-NlqESSEE 14ID-SOUTH -@--.Ol-$lOO.%832; 02-$381361; 03-$33,776 9.1 Ol-$72,701 (for ten mnths); 02-$69,308; 03-$72,326 204 321 (for ten rron@uhs) VIISCONSIII Ol-$370,080; 02-$275,800; 03-$200,800 FLORIDA -02SI = Ol-$163,900; 02-$163,@000; 03-$163,900 02S2 = Disa,,op.L-oved 02S3 = Ol-$10-3,272; 02-$16@,272; 03-$163,272 02SIl = Ol-$73,172 (ei@u- months) First Operati-onal Ol-$792 3251; 02-$686,386; 03-$690,879 Operational Succier,.ent = Ol-$150 JOOO; 02-$150,000; 03-$150,000. (The --amunt is a-o@-@xi-rate and CoLL-icil deleo-ates to s'uaff, the se@tin- of an exact amount. Ccmmitmen@u Should be for three years.) I I I - RetLwn for revision under the conditions specified by the ew Cormii" -@'-@Arkansas IV. Deferral for further review and advise-as specified by the Review Committee Ohio Valley South Carolina V. Disapproval -@er conditions specified by the Review Comdttee Jerz ;Idbany VI under conditions specified by the Council ifornia '2169.1) Council endorsed the recori-,n--nda-uions of the Cal this applicati excep- &28 (A Coffdttee on all corrponenus of on u rr Comprehensive Stroke Proora-@.). In this case they acbepted the recorrmenda'uions of the site visitors. Ol-$556,369; 02-$546,145; and 03-$547,655 (2169.2) Endorsed Co,@t@ee recomeridation ($210-000 u '-l June month unt, 30, 1969).@,ii@h co@tted suoport for t,TO additional years, in an.arr:ounL@, to be set with the advice of site visitors. (2/69.4) Endorsed Cor,,-mi'tee recorarendation - Project 23 - L' Ol-$122,0q-O; 02-$127,540; and 03-$123,955. Project 22 to be returned for revision. Interr@,oun,,ain (2/69.1) Deferral, pending the development of a 6licy oovern-'Ln@ pro L p jects o' this kind (see Council'minutes) (2/69.2 and 3) Ol-$151,20'6;'02-$145,451-N 03-$269,319; 04-$265.,253 Roches' uer = Tne Council endorsed the reco@tendations of the Comnittee except on project 13. In this case they recorn@nded approval of olect in the peduc-ejd..amount@ecormended--by-.the.- ite.. 'sfto t@e p S Vl rs, but that no additional funds be added to the total award to the on. $25@,051; 02-$184 164; 03-$190 064 Western Pennsylvania The Council endorsed the general recommendations --7-of-the Reviev; Co, u@ttee Ttiith the folloi-rinv specific @dditions: .---.(a) 7ne a-rqoLLnt to be a,,%rarded for interim support of the core (April 1 thru June 30, 1969) is to be based upon an amual -..----level not in excess of the present level plus $100 Ooo.. 3 (b)- The amount for continuation of cor@ activities under @he operational grant (July 1, 1969 et' e@..) ;,rill'@e set by the Council ifnen it considers the e t@i e ooer-atiorial apolication and has the finding of the site visit. Mary and Tne Council x,,,as unable to arrive at a recoT,.menda;u-ion because of the difference be@i-reen It-,he recorn,@nda'L-,ions of the site visitors u the Co- and the reco,,@iendauions c.L U, ,,,dutee. Puthority for final ..-----action i..,as defeated toa referee. cori-dnittee of three rrerrbers. A total w.-iard ceilino, of $1 3 445,177 for projects @ras set. (NOM: A of the findings of the three member coL@'ttee wil be the report subject of a.subseqltent memo.