skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 066469  
Title: CHINESE CONCEPTIONS OF LAW - CONFUCIAN, LEGALIST, AND BUDDHIST
Journal: HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL  Volume:29  Dated:(JULY 1978)  Pages:1307-1329
Author(s): L T LEE ; W W LAI
Corporate Author: University of California
Hastings College of Law
United States
Publication Date: 1978
Pages: 23
Type: Histories/historical perspectives
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: AN UNDERSTANDING OF LAW IN PRESENT DAY CHINA IS SOUGHT THROUGH A REVIEW OF THE THREE MAJOR PHILOSOPHIES, CONFUCIAN, LEGALIST, AND BUDDHIST, ON WHICH CHINESE LEGAL THOUGHT IS FOUNDED.
Abstract: THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN CHINA GREW OUT OF THE THOUGHTS OF THE LEGALISTS, WHO HELPED TO ESTABLISH THE FIRST EMPIRE. THE IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING DYNASTY SAW A CONFUCIAN LEGALIST SYNTHESIS. THE OLDEST, CONFUCIAN, CONCEPT OF 'LI' REGULATES THE SOCIAL ORDER AND HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS BY AUTHORITY OF CUSTOM WITH THE FORCE OF LAW, FORBIDDING TRESPASSES BEFORE THEY ARE COMMITTED. 'LI' EMPHASIZES THE NATURAL ORDER AND MORAL RULES, CONSTITUTING A CODE OF ETIQUETTE AND RITUAL PROPRIETY ENFORCED BY SOCIETY RATHER THAN THE GOVERNMENT. 'FA,' ON THE OTHER HAND, PUNISHES CRIMINAL ACTS AFTER COMMISSION, WITH EMPHASIS ON GOVERNMENT BY DECREE, AS IT WAS ESTABLISHED BY THE LEGALISTS OF THE THIRD CENTURY HAN DYNASTY. THIS CONCEPTUAL DICHOTOMY OF 'LI' AND 'FA', COMPLEMENTING AND COORDINATING WITH EACH OTHER, HAS DOMINATED CHINESE LAW FOR 2,100 YEARS, REPRESENTING THE OLDEST CONTINUOUSLY SURVIVING LEGAL SYSTEM IN THE WORLD. IN ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN 'LI' AND 'FA,' TRADITIONAL CHINESE SOCIETY PREFERRED 'LI,' WHICH ALSO DOMINATED INTERSTATE RELATIONS. BUDDHA'S 'DHARMA' (TEACHING, LAW; CHINESE--'LU') BEGAN TO INFLUENCE CHINESE LAW IN THE FIFTH CENTURY. IT INTRODUCED A NEW ETHIC OF MOTIVATION BASED ON THE 'KARMA' (ACTION, DEED) OF THE MIND. BUDDHISM ALSO BROUGHT AN ALTERATION OF THE BASIC SOCIAL STRUCTURE. WHERE PREVIOUSLY ONLY STATE AND FAMILY AUTHORITY HAD EXISTED, THE BUDDHIST ORDER OF MONKHOOD ESTABLISHED A COMMUNITY INDEPENDENT OF EITHER AND GOVERNED BY ITS OWN CANON OF MONASTIC LAW, INCULCATING IDEALS OF UNIFORMITY, EQUALITY, AND SELF-DISCIPLINED INDIVIDUAL AUTONOMY. IN SUBSEQUENT CENTURIES, MAHAYANIST EMBELLISHMENTS OF THE BUDDHIST TEACHING IN CHINA POPULARIZED ESCHATOLOGICAL NOTIONS ABOUT THE DECAY OF ALL DOCTRINES AND THE IMMINENT ARRIVAL OF THE FUTURE BUDDHA. THESE GAVE RISE TO COMMUNISTIC PEASANT REBELLIONS AGAINST THE OPPRESSIONS OF LAW AND INSTITUTIONS. ATTITUDES IN CONTEMPORARY CHINA ECHO THE CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF ALL THREE PHILOSOPHIES. THE 'LI' OF MAO HAS REPLACED THAT OF CONFUCIUS; THE MASSES HAVE TAKEN PART IN THE FORMULATION OF 'FA.' ETHICS OF MOTIVATION HAVE BECOME 'THOUGHT REFORM' AND 'SELF-CRITICISM', INDIVIDUAL MERIT IS REWARDED, AND UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD REIGNS. WESTERNERS' ATTEMPTING TO UNDERSTAND CHINESE LAW TODAY MUST GO BEYOND THE SCRUTINY OF MERE STATUTES AND AIM AT INSIGHTS INTO THE NATURE OF CHINESE SOCIETY, HISTORY, AND PHILOSOPHY. FOOTNOTES ARE INCLUDED. (MRK)
Index Term(s): Socioculture ; Laws and statutes/ ; Legal doctrines ; China
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=66469

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder