The most serious criticism is the misclas&cation of the a&ve smoking status of the subjects, which can produce an apparent increased risk with involuntary smoking. Moreover, it is likely to result in differential misclassification because spouses tend to have similar smoking habits (Burch 1981; Sutton 1981; Higgins et al. 1937). Speculation that the positive results reported in Japan and Greece were due to cultural bias against the admission of smoking by women in these more traditional societies may be discounted because positive significant findings have now been observed in the United States (Correa et al. 1983; Garfinkel et al. 1985) and in Sweden (Pershagen et al., in press), where no comparable social stigma exists. Moreover, in the studies by Garfinkel and coworkers (1985) and Pershagen and coworkers (in press), the personal smoking status of each subject was validated and verified at interview, usually by next of km, who presumably would have no reason to misrepresent the true smoking status of the subject. Misclassification of the lung as the primary site and the lack of pathological confirmation are repeated concerns, but it must be stressed that this bias would tend to dilute a true effect. Correa (1983), Garfiiel (198!5), and Pershagen (in press) and their respec- tive colleagues addressed this issue by including only pathologically confirmed lung cancers and considering histological cell type in their analyses. In the study by Garfmkel and associates (1985), after & independent pathological review was conducted, a significant associ- ation of excess risk with involuntary smoking remained. Misclassifi- cation of exposure to RTS cannot be dismissed, since an index based solely on the smoking habits of a current spouse may not be indicative of past exposure, cumulative exposure, or the relevant dose to the respiratory tract. The magnitude of risk associated with involuntary smoking exposure is uncertain. Relative risks ranging from 2 to 3 were generally reported for the highest level of exposure based on the spouses' smoking habits, but since sample sixes in most studies are not large, the point estimates of effect are unstable, and confidence limits are broad and generally overlap from one study tc another. An index of involuntary smoking based on the smoking habits of the spouse is a simplistic and convenient measure. There is no reason to believe, however, that the excess risk associated with involuntary smoking is restricted to exposure from spouses. Nonsmokers married to smokers are likely to be more tolerant of EZS exposure and to experience more exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (Wald and Ritchie 1984). Higher risk estimates for involuntary smoking have been obtained in studies restricted to squamous cell and small cell carcinomas of the lung. Although involuntary smoking can be established as a cause of lung cancer, important questions related to this exposure require 101 further research. More accurate estimates for the assessment of exposure in the home, workplace, and other environments are needed. Studies of sufficiently large populations should also be performed. New data from such studies should yield more certain risk estimates and describe the magnitude of the lung cancer risk in nonsmokers. other Cancef8 several recent studies provide data on the relationship of RTS exposure to cancer at sites other than the lung. Two published reports address the risk of other cancers in adults from exposure to tobacco smoke from spouses. Using the same Japanese cohort described previously, Hirayama (1984a) reported excess mortality for cancers of the paranasal sinus (N=28) and brain (N=34) among nonsmoking women who were married to smokers. The standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for nasal sinus cancer were 1.00,1.67,2.02, and 2.65 for women whose husbands never smoked, or had smoked 10 to 14,15 to 19, or 20 or more cigarettes per day, respectively (one- sided p for trend, 0.03). The corresponding SMRs for brain tumors were 1.00, 3.03, 6.25, and 4.32, respectively (on+sided p for trend, 0.004). The total number of deaths due to nasa.l cancer and brain tumors was small, and the numerators in the risk calculations were unstable, based on five nasal cancers and three brain cancers in women whose husbands were nonsmokers. In one study (I3rinton et al. 19&Q, active tobacco smoking was associated with an increased risk of sinus cancer, particularly squamous cell tumors. Sidestream smoke has also been suggested to be of etiological importance in brain tumors in children (Preston-Martin et al. 1982). In a -ntrol study of adult cancers in relation to childhood and adult exposure to involuntary smoking, Sandier and coworkers (1965a, 1986) reported an overall cancer risk of 1.6 (95 percent C.I. 1.2, 2.1) associated with exposure to spouses' smoking, which was more marked in nonsmokers than smokers. Significant increases were observed for cancer of the breast (OR 1.8), cervix (OR 1.8), and endocrine organs (OR 3.2). This study has been criticized in its choice of controls and in the exclusion of certain cancers by the design of the study. The biological plausibility of the study's findings was also questioned because the highest risk estimates were observed for cancers that have not been consistently related to active smoking and because higher risks were observed for nonsmokers than for smkers. Failure to control for potential confounding factors and kmnvn risk factors for the individual cancer sites under study may have produced artifact& results QYiedman 1986; Mantel 1986; Rurch 1966). In a subsequent analysis of the same study population, Samher, Wilcox, and Everson (1985a,b) reported increasing cancer risks with incmahg exposure to involuntary smoking as measured by the number of smokers in the household and by the time periods of exposure. The biologic plausibility of these findings was aIso questioned (Burch 1985; Higgins 1985; Lee 1985). The effect of parental smoking on the development of cancers both during ~hildhd and in adult life is also of in&eat. The relationship of parental smoking to overall cancer risk in children or in adults has been assessed in three studies. A prospective survey (Neubl and Buck 1971) of about 90,060 infants in Canada and the United Kingdom followed for a maximum of 10 years found an overa.II cancer risk of 1.3 (95 percent C.I. 0.8, 2.2) associated with maternal smoking during pregnancy. No dose-response relationship was observed, but there were few heavy smokers (>l pack/day) in this study. A Swedish case-control study (Stjemfeldt et al. 1986) of aII cancers found a risk of 1.4 (95 percent CL 1.0, 1.9) for maternal smoking during pregnancy. A do-response relationship was dem- onstrated; the risk was highest in the most exposed group, those smoking 10 or more cigarettes per day (RR 1.6, p < 0.01). On the basis of the smoking habits of the parents of subjects up to 10 years of age, Samher, Everson, W&ox, and Browder (1985) reported no significant difference between all cancer cases and controls with respect to the mother's smoking (RR 1.1, 95 percent CL 0.7, 1.6), but the father's smoking was related to an overall increased risk (RR 1.5,95 percent CL 1.1, 2.0). In these three studies, analysis by specific cancer site revealed an increased risk of leukemia associated with parental smoking. Neutel and Buck (1971) found an almost twofold increased risk of leukemia in &i&en of mothers who smoked during pregnancy, but the association was not statisticahy significant. Stjernfeldt and colleagues (1986) reported a sign&ant positive association between maternal smoking and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The relative risks were 1.0, 1.3, and 2.1 (p for trend, 914-915, October 3,198l. MANTEL, N. Pee&e smoking in adulthood and cancer risk. &ztter). American Journal of &idemioL+y 123(2):367368, February 1986. MARTINEZ, F., ANTOGNONI, G.. MACRI, F., LEBOIVITZ, M., RONCHEXTI, R. Distribution of bronchial reqoneiveneae to a constrictive drug in a random pediatric population sample. (abetract). American Review of Respimtory Disease 13X4, part 2U242, April 1985. UmuKuRA, S., HAMADA, H., SEINO, Y., MURANAKA. H., HIGASHI, E. Peesive smoking. (letter). New E&and Journal of Medicine 312(11):72&721, March 14, 1985. ~l--U'Rh S., TAMINATO, T., IUTANO, N., SEINO, Y., HAMADA, H., UCHMASHI, M., N-, H., HIRATA, Y. Effects of environmental tobacco mde on UrinarJr cotinine excretion in nonemokem: Evidence for passive smoking. New England Jownal of i%dicine 311(132828-8%X, September n, 1984. MaNNOCH& KM., ROGHMANN, K.J. Bronchiolitis as a possible cauee of wheezing in hildhood: New evidence. Pediutrics 74(1):1-10, July 19&Q. MdMJNOCH?TE, KM., ROGm, K.J..Predicting clinically s-cant lower =PhtQrY tract illmsa in childhood following mild bronchiolitis. American J~wd of Diseases of Children 139(6):625-631, June 1985. MURRAY, A.B., MORRISON, B.J. The effect of cigerette smoke from the mother on tmmhid reeponsiveneee and severity of symptoms in children with esthma. Jow~l of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 77(4):675-581, April 1986. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SClENCES. Risk Assessment in the Fedeml Government: Maw&g he Jhws. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 1983. 114 NEUTEL, C.I., BUCK, C. Effect of smoking during pregnancy on the risk of center in children. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 47(459-63, July 1971. O'CONNOR, G., WEISS, S.T., TAGER, I., SPEIZER, F.E. The effect of passive smoking on nonspecific bronchial responsiveneee in a population sample of chiIdren and young adults. (abstract). CZinicaZ Reseaxh 34(2):581A, April 1986. PATHAK, DR, SAMET, J.M., HUMBLE, C.G.. SKIPPER, B J. Determinanta of lung cancer risk in cigarette smokers in New Mexico. Journal of the Natiorud Cancer Institute 76(4):597X)4, April 1986. PEDREIRA, F.A., GUANDOLO, V.L., FEROLI, E.J., MELLA, G.W., WEISS, I.P. Involuntary smoking and incidence of respiratory illness during the first year of life. Pediatrics 75(3):594-597, March 1985. PERSHAGEN, G., ZDENEK, H., SVENSSON, C. Passive smoking and lung cancer in Swedish women. American Journal of Epidemiology, in press. PETERS, J&I., FERRIS, B.G., Jr. Smoking, puhnonary function, and reepiratory symptoma in a college-age group. American Review of Respiratory L&ease 95(5):774-782, May 1967. PICKLE, L.W., BROWN, L.M., BLOT, W.J. Information available from surrogate respondents in casecontrol interview studies. American Journd of Epidemidgy 118(1):99-108, July 1983. PIMM, P.E., SILVERMAN, F., SHEPHARD. R.J. Physiological effects of acute passive exposure to cigarette smoke. Archives of Environmental Health 33(4):201-213, July-August 1978. PITTENGER, D.J. Passive smoking. Oetter). New England Journul of Medicine 312(11):720, March 14,1985. PRESTON-MARTIN, S., YU, MC., BENTON, B.. HENDERSON, B.E. N-nitroso compounds and childhood brain tumors: A casecontrol study. Cancer Reseamh 42(l2):6240-5245, December 1982. PULLAN, C.R., HEY, E.N. Wheezing, asthma, and pulmonary dysfunction 10 years after infection with respiratory syncytiaI virus in infancy. British Medical Joumul 284(6330):166&1669, June 5,198Z. PUKANDER, J., LUOTONEN, J., TIMONEN, M., KARMA, P. Risk facto= affecting the occurrence of acute otitia media among 2-3-yearold urban children. Acta W ZaryngoZiw 100@4):260-265, September-October 1985. RANTAKALLIO, P. Relationship of maternal smoking to morbidity and mortaiity of the child up to the age of five. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 67(5)621631, September 1978. RAWBONE, R.G., KEELING, C.A., JENKINS, A., GUZ. A. Cigarette smoking among secondary school children in 1975: Prevalence of respiratory symptoms, knowledge of health hazards, and attitudes to smoking end health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 32(1):53-X$ March 1978. REPACX, J.L., LOWREY, A.H. A quantitative e&mate of nonsmokers' lung cancer risk from passive smoking. Environment InternationaI 11(1X3-22,1985. ROBINSON, B.F. Effects of passive smoking. getter). New England Joumd of Medicine 299(16):896, October 19,1978. RUSH, D. Respiratory symptoms in a group of American secondary echo01 students: The overwhelming association with cigarette smoking. International Journal of Epidemidogy 3(2):153-X5, June 1974. RUSSELL, M.A.H., FEYERABEND C. Blood and urinary nicotine in nonsmokers. Lumet 7990(1):179-181, January 251975. RUSSELL, M.AH., JARVIS, M.J., WEST, R.J. Use of urinary nicotine concentration to estimate exposure and mortality from passive smoking in non-smokers. British Jownul ofAddiction 81:275-281,1986. RUTSCH, M. Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer (letter). British Medical Journd 2%X6269):936, March 21,198l. 11: SAG, D.L. B& h analptic reeeamh. Journal of Chronic Dkeaeee 32(1-a61-63, 1979. SAID, G., ZALOKAR, J., LELLOUCH, J., PATOIS, E. Parental smoking related to &n&j&,omy and tonsillectomy in ~hildt~~ JOUITUI~ of Epidemiology and Community He&h 32(2)97-101. June 1973. SALCGJEE, Y., VESEY, C.J.. COLE, P.V., RUSSELL, M.A.H. Carhoxyhemoglobin ~dp~mathiocyanate:~rnplemen~indicatorsOfSmO~behaviour?Thomr 37(7):521-525, July 1932. SAMET, JM., TAGER LB., SPEIEER, FE. The reIation8hip between respiratory fia h CM&,& and chronic air-flow ohetruction in aduhhood. Am&am Review of Respimtov LXeeaee 127(4X--=% April 1983. SANDIER, D-P., EVERSON, R.B., WILCOX, AJ. Passive smoking in adulthood and cancer r+k. Am&can Jownal of Epidemiology 121(1):37-48, January 1935. smq D.P., EVERSON, R.B., WILCOX, A. J. Passive smoking in aduhhood end cancer risk. getter). A merican Journal of Epidemiology 123(2):369-370, Fehruary 1988. SANDIER, D.P., EVERSON, R.B., WILCOX, A.J., BROWDER, J.P. Cancer ri& in &&hood from early life exposure to parents' smoking. American Journal of Public Hwlth 75(5):487-&Z, May 1935. SANDLER, DP., WILCOX, AJ., EVERSON, R.B. cumulative effects of I&time passive smoking on cancer risk. Lam-et 1(3424):312314, February 9,198sa MNDLER, D.P., WILCOX, A-J., EVERSON, R.B. Lifetime passive smoking and cancer risk. (letter). Lancet 1@433~:857, April 13,1985b. W, MB., SAMET, J.M., SPEZER, F.E. Effect of cigarette tar content and smoking habits on respiratory eymptoma in women. American Review of Reepim- tory Disease 125(6):634-699, June 1932. ScHENKFlR. M.B., SAMEI', J.M., SPEWER, F.E. Risk factors for childhood re~pira- tory dkae The effect of host factora and home environmental expomuea American Review of Reepimtory Disease 1!23(6):1036-1043, December 1933. 8CHIIUNG, R.S.F., LETAI, A.D., HUI, S.L., BECK, G.J., SCHOENBERG, J.B., BOUHUYS, A.H. Lung function, respiratory disease, and smoking in families. American Journal of Epidemialogv 106(4):274-2X& October 1977. SCHLESSELMAN, J.J. Case-Cbnbul Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis. Monographs in Epidemiol~ and Biostatistics, Vol. 2. New York, Oxford University Press, 1932. SCHMELTZ. I., HOFFMANN, D., WYNDER, E.L. The infiuence of tobacco smoke on indoor atmoephereez I. An overview. Prcucntiue Medicine 4(1):66-32, March 1975. SRELY, J.E., ZUSKIN, E., BOUHUYS, A. Cigarette smokingz Objective evidence for lung damage in teenagers. Science 172(3934):741-743, May 14,197l. SBEPHARD, R.J., COLLINS, R., SILVERMAN, F. `*Paggiye" exposure of asthmatic subjecta to cigarette smoke. Environmental Research 200:392-402, December 1979. SIMS, D.G., DOWNHAM, M.A.P.S., GARDNER, P.S., WEBB, J.K.G., WEIGHTMAN, D. Study of Syearold &i&en with a &tory of respiratory ~yncytiaI virue bronchiolitis in infancy. Bi-ittih dfedicol J0um1 1(6104):11-14, January 7, 1978. SPEIZER, FE., FERRIS, B., Jr., BISHOP, Y.M.M., SPENGLER, J. Reapiiatory d&!aee rates and pulmonary function in children associated with NO, exposure. American Review of Reepimtory Disease 121(1):3-10, January 1980. SPEIEER, F.E., TAGER, I.B. Epidemiology of chronic mucus hypersecretion and obstructive airways disease. Epidemiologic Reviews 1:124-142,1979. =`INAcI, S., ARGSSA, W., BURGIANI, M., NORTALE, P., BUCCA, C., DeCGNDUS SION. E. The effects of air pollution on the respiratory health of chikirem A cram- sectional study. Pediatric Pdm~n~logy 1(5):26%266,1935. STERLING, T.D. Nonsmoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer. Oetter). British Medical Journal 232(6270):1156, April 4,193l. 116 STEWART, A., WEBB, J., HEWITT, D. A survey of childhood malignancies. British Medical Journal 59@6):149&1508, June 18,1958. STJERNFELDT, hf., BERGLUND, K., LINDSTEN, J., LUDVIGSSON, J. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and rink of childhood cancer. Lancet 1(8494):1359-1352, June 14,1986. STGBER, W. Lung dynamics and uptake of smoke constituents by nonsmokers: A survey. Preventive Medicine 13(6X589-661, November 1984. SUTTON, G.C. Passive smoking and lung cancer. (letter). British bfcdiciul Joumul 282(6266):733, February 28.1981. SVENDSEN, K.H., KULLER, L.H., NRATON, J.D. Effecta of passive smoking in the Multiple Riik Factor Intervention Trial (MBFlT). Cimuhtion, Part H, No. 4, October 1985. TAGER, I.B. Passive smoking and reepiratory health in children: Sophistry or carwe for concern? Ameria n Review of Respimtory D&use 133(6):959-961, June 1986. TAGER, I.B., MUNOZ, A., ROSNER, B.. WEISS, S.T., CAREY, V., SPEIZER, F.E. Effect of cigarette smoking on the pulmonary function of children and adolescents. American Review of Reepimtory Disease 131(5):75%759, May 1985. TAGER, LB., WEISS, S.T., MUNOZ, A., ROSNER, B., SPEIZER, F.E. Longitudinai study of the effects of maternal smoking on pulmonary function in children. New England Journal of Medicine 309(12):699-763, September 22,1983. TAGER, LB., WEISS, S.T., ROSNER, B., SPElZER, F.E. Effect of parental cigarette smoking on the pulmonary function of children. American Journal of Epidemiolo- gy 119(1):1&26, July 1979. TASHKIN, D., CLARK, VA., SIMMONS, M., REEMS, C., COULSON, A.H., BOURQUE, L.B., SAYRE, J.W., DETERS, R, ROKAW, S. The UCLA population studies of chronic obstructive respiratory dieease: 7. Relationship between perenta smoking and children's lung function. American Review of Reepimtory LXaeaa X%X6):891-897, June 1984. TRICHOPOULOS, D. Pamive smoking and lung cancer. (ietter). Lancet 1(8378):684, March 24,1984. TRICHOPOUIDS. D., KALANDIDI, A., SPARROS, L. Lung cancer and passive smoking. Conclusion of Greek study. (letter). Lancet 2@351):677678, September 17.1983. TRICHOFOULUS, D., KALANDIDI, A., SPARROS, L., MacMAHON, B. Lung cancer and passive smoking. Internationul Journd of Ckzncer 27(1):14, January 15,198l. TSOKOS, C.P. NonamoLiag wives of heavy smokem have a higher risk of lung cancer. (letter). Britih Me&calJoumuZ 283(6364):146-+1465, November 28.1981. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE. Smoking and He&k A Rty& of the Surgeon GenemL DHEW Pub. No. @`HS)79-59066. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, OHice of the Am&ant Secretary for Health. Of&z-e on Smoking and Health, 1979. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. The Health Conse- quencee of Smoking for Women A Report of the Surgeon Geneml . U.S. Department of Health and Human Servim, Public Health Service, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office on Smoking and Health, 1980. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. The Health Conee- quences of Smoking: Cancer. A Report of the Surgeon GenemL DHHS Pub. NO. (PHS)82-59179. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health 8ervice, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office on Smoking and Health, 1982. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. The Health Conse- quences of Smoking: Car&ovas~ular Disease. A Report of the Surgeon GenemL DHHS Pub. No. (PHS)84-50264. U.S. Department of Health and Human Service% Public Health Service, Ofike of the Assistant Secretary for Health, OEce on Smoking and Health, 1983. 117 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. The Health Cbnee- qmmm of Smoking Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. A Report of the Surgeon &TUZ~Z. DHHS Pub. No. o&dso295. US. Department of Heaith and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Ass&ant Secretary for Health, OfSce on Smoking and Health, 1984. U.S. PLJRLIC HEALTH SERVICE. Smoking and Health. Report of the Advieoory Committee to the Surgeon GenemI of the F'ublic He&h Service. PHS Pub. NO. 1103. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Centers for Disesse Control, 1964. VAN STRENSELMOLL, H.A., V ALRENBURG, H.A., VANDENBROUCKE, J.P. Are maternal fertility problems related to cbildbood leukaemia? IntemutionaZ Journal of Epidemiology 14(4):555-559, December 1985. VEDAL, S., SCHENKER, M.B., SAMET, J.M., SPEIZER, F.E. Risk factors for chiMhocd respiratory disease: Analysis of pulmonary function. American Review of Respiratory Dkeaae 139(2):187-192, August 1984. VUTUC, C. Quantitative aspects of passive smoking and lung cancer. Prewntiuc Medicine 13(6):698-794, November 1984. WAlTE, C.L. Effects of passive smoking. oetter). i&w En&and Journal of Medicine 299(16):897,0&&x 19,1978. WAKRHAN, H. Effects of passive smoking. (letter). New England Journnl of Medicitae 299(16):896, Octcber 19,1978. WALD, N.J., BOREHAM, J., BAILEY, A., RITCHIE, C., HADDOW, J.E., RNIGHT, G. Urinary c&nine as marker of breathing other people's tobacco smoke. getter). Lancet 1@370):239-231, January 28,1984. WALD, NJ., IDLE, M., BOREHAM, J., BAILEX, A. Carbon monoxide in breath in relation to smoking and carboxyhaemoglobm levels. !l7wmx 36(5):366-369, May 1981. WALL4 N.J., RITCHIE, C. Validation of studies on lung cancer in nonsmokers married to smokers, getters). Lancet 1(8385):1067, May 12,1984. WALTER, S., NANCY, N.R., COLLIER, C.R. Changee in forced expiratory ~pirogram in YOUUJ male smokers. American Review of Respimtov Disease 1X3(5):717-724 1974. WARE, J.H., DOCKERY, D.W., SPIRO, A. III, SPEIEER, F.E., FERRIS, B.G., Jr. Passive SmOking, gas cooking, and respiratory health of children living in six cities. American Review of Respimtvry Dieeaee 129(3):366474, March 1984. =EWER, S.E., WEISS, S.T. Puhnonary d&ases. bx Burrow, G.N., Ferris, T.F. (A). Medical Complications During Rugnon~y. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 1981, pp. 465-4~. WEI% ST., TAGER, LB., MUNO& A., SPELZER, F.E. The relationship of respiratory infections in early childhood to the occurrence of increased levele of bronchial responsiveness and atopy. A April 1985. merican Review of Respimtory D&use 13X4):573-578, mm, S-T., TAGER, LB., SPEIZER, F.E., ROSNER, B. Persistent wheeze: Its relation ~ZJJ ~Piramry i)biesa, cigarette smoking, and level of pulmonary function in a population -pie of children. American Review of Reepimtory Disease 122(5X697- 707, November 1980. WHIT& J-R., FROEB, H.F. Small-airways dysfunction in nonsmokers chronically exposed ta tobacco smoke. New England Jouma[ of Medicine 392(13):720-723, March 27,198O. -MO% A., ALTSHULER, B. Lung cancer incidence in cigarette smokers: Further adysis of Doll and Hill% data for British physicians. Biometrics 32(4:805-816, December 1976. mD-3 I-W., MAHLER, D.A., LGRE J., VIRGULTO, J.A., SNYDER, P., =mY, R.A. Acute effecta of passive smoking on lung function and airway r~~ivity in asthmatic subjects. Chest 890:180-185, February 1986. 118 WOOLCOCK, A.J., PEAT, J.K., LEEDER, S.R., BLACKBURN, C.R.B. @de.). The development of lung function in Sydney children: Effecta of respiratory illness and smoking. A ten year study. European Joumul of Be8pimtoz-y Diseases 65(Suppl. 132):1-137,X% WLJ, A.H., HENDERSON, B.E., PIKE, M.C., YU, M.C. Smoking and other risk factora for lung cancer in women. Journal of the National Cuncer Institute 74(4):747-751, April 1985. WYNDER, E.L., HOFFMANN , D. Tobacco and Tobacco Smok Studk in &perimen- tal Cancinogeneais. New York, Academic Press, 1967. WYNDER, E.L. STELLMAN, S.D. Comparative epidemiology of totirelated caners. Cancer Research 37(12):4608-%22, December 1977. YARNELL, J.W.G., ST. LEGER, A.S. Respiratory illness, maternal smoking habit and lung function in children. British Joumal of Diseases of the Chest 79(3)%&236, July 1979. 119 CHAPTER 3 ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE CHEMISTRY AND EXPOSURE OF NONSMOKERS CONTENTS Introduction Laboratory Smoking Human Smoking Sidestream Smoke Formation and Physicochemical Nature Chemical Analysis Radioactivity of Tobacco Smoke Environmental Tobacco Smoke Comparison of Toxic and Carcinogenic Agents in Main- stream Smoke and in Environmental Tobacco Smoke Number and Size Distribution of Particles in Environ- mental Tobacco Smoke Estimating Human Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke Time-Activity Patterns Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Smokers Determinations of Concentration of Environmental Tobacco Smoke Microenvironmental Measurements of Concentration Monitoring Studies Conclusions References 123 Introduction The physicochemical nature of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is governed by the type and form of the tobacco product or products burned, by the prevailing environmental conditions, and by secondary reactions. Mainstream smoke (MS) is the complex mixture that exits from the mouthpiece of a burning cigarette, cigar, or pipe when a puff is inhaled by the smoker. Sidestream smoke (SS) is formed between puff-drawings and is freely emitted into the air surrounding a smoldering tobacco product. Sidestream smoke repre- sents the major source for ETS. The exhaled portions of MS and the vapor phase components that diffuse through the wrapper into the surrounding air constitute minor contributors to ETS. In the scientific literature, the terms "passive smoking," "involun- tary smoking," and "inhalation of ETS" are frequently used inter- changeably (US DHEW 1979; US DHHS 19821964). Laboratory Smoking Data on the composition of MS and SS originate from laboratory studies. For such studies, cigarettes, cigars, or pipes are smoked by machines under standardized reproducible conditions. It is a major goal of these measurements to compare the yields of the specific components in the MS or SS or both of a variety of experimental or commercial tobacco products and to simulate, though not to repro- duce, human smoking habits. The most widely used standard conditions for machine smoking cigarettes and little cigars (5 1.5 g) are one 35 mL puff of 2-second duration drawn once a minute to a butt length of 23 mm, or the length of the filter tip plus the over-wrap plus 3 mm (Brunnemann et al. 1976). The annual reports of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission on the tar, nicotine, and carbon monox- ide content of the smoke of U.S. commercial cigarettes are based on these laboratory smoking conditions. For cigars, the standard smoking conditions are a 20 mL puff of l&second duration taken once every 40 seconds, and a butt length of 33 mm CInternational Committee for Cigar Smoke Study 1974). The most frequently used pipe-smoking conditions call for the bowl to be filed with 1 g of tobacco and a 50 mL puff of l-second duration to be taken every 12 seconds (Miller 1964). A number of devices for collecting sidestream smoke have been developed (Dube and Green 1982). The most widely used device is a collection apparatus made of glass and cooled by water circulating through an outer jacket. The air entering the chamber through a distributor has a flow rats of 25 mL per second (1.5 L/min) (Brurmemann and Hoffmann 1974). Under these conditions, the yields of mainstream smoke components from a cigarette approxi- mate those obtained from the same cigarette when it is being smoked 125