skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 123532  
Title: Non-Lethal Weapons: The Potential and the Pitfalls
Journal: Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice  Volume:6  Issue:1  Dated:(February 1990)  Pages:1-7
Author(s): G Geis ; A Binder
Publication Date: 1990
Pages: 7
Type: Surveys
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: The use of nonlethal weapons by the police could significantly reduce the number of episodes involving deadly force.
Abstract: Killing a human being, whether the person is guilty or innocent, often causes a heavy psychological burden for police officers. Nonlethal weapons offer an opportunity to save life and to avoid the uncomfortable and sometimes devastating consequences that can accompany police shootings. However, there seems to be a reasonable fear among police officers that they will be saddled with technological devices that will further inhibit their reliance on guns for self-protection. The ideal kind of nonlethal weapon would presumably employ an agent, such as a chemical, to produce a numbing or other disabling effect. The effect would have to be instantaneous if the officer is in immediate danger. Agents such as tear gas, used in dangerous situations, could lead to random weapon firing and an even more serious threat than nonaction. The best agent would be one that is absorbed immediately into the body through the skin, although these projectiles would have to penetrate clothing yet not be as dangerous as bullets. A fundamental problem regarding nonlethal weapons is that it is impossible for the average police officer to have on hand an entire arsenal of equipment and then to weigh a situation and select the most appropriate time for weapon use. 8 references. (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Nonlethal weapons
Index Term(s): Police weapons use ; Police use of deadly force
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=123532

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder