'-'I--z- .I 21 October 1976 Dr. F. M. 63. Crick, F.R.S., Tha Salk Institute, Pas% Office Bsx 18OEs, San Dfego, California 92112, U.S.A. Dear Fr&Rcls * Thank you for eiI1 the new letters, ~~~ti~~l~r~y tbo correspondence wi.th BE&. P certainly is an excitiug tiw?. and I very much liks your idea of ths supersolanafd. I have called a ehrsmatin mgsetingg for tu.5 +. Fridsy , at which Ashburner and dney will be prasernt. I have already had a wcwd with S dney, and he 3 ERks your point (in your Jotter of 14 October) about translaoation fe a good one. I wfll write again after th9 mm3ting at whfch the gcmatic ~rn~l~c~%~~~g will have been d~S6~SS~d. OR the supersol~~sid itself, I havs novi fournd my notes on the E.M. ~~%0%~n~ in Jemsal3m, and Bans Ris def ni%ely said that mitotic ch~omosmies were3 fcrlpnnefd by folding the 250 ffbre into OR.63 of dfmster about 108Q - 0 w. ~iCira>wew%r hs did not ~r~s%~t amy ~~~t~~ss (his slides were lost when his baggage wcw srtalen at Par%s Airport!) but I suspect they would splow tha SL~MQ sort af murky pfct~es 88 k&km@, and the, ddea of coiling into a thfcker fibre is just a @neral oue. I doubt- i-f hs has any shard evfdencs, but he may hawe borne estimates of diams%srs from seations. This value -r;ay be a tsicky one since I would Lmagirae that it could shange fairly Qasfly if the coils of tka aupsraolsnoid were not held by ties. dary idaa of tha ties bafng preserved fs 8 very xlsat cm%, but 3 wonder if it isn't r;all ov%rs~mpI~f~ed. Sid~cey ,thaught it urtlikely, but I do gee the point of the possible correlation between the smorllnsss of DrssopfiJtla mrEstaphass chromosome and that smaller size of the genes. I have been. looking at g~-~pere on ths elactlron microscopy af sectioned m.ftotfu chromubaomes asld there is just ILO trace of a hollow cexltre . There Pilre many examplwt, but I enclose a reprint of ai old psper of Hugh's, SBCB flgura 14, Richard Skaer has a380 brought in Born& much more rscent photographs, and what one 8888 ia transverss*section m-63 fairly dense bsdias about a micron across. Even allowing for the posalble double helical coilfng at the next level, I think 8 hollow tube would have bmm svfdont ~VMJ. if it had bean canafderabPy flgsttened. " ' Perhaps the lumen is filled wvfth other proteins and possibly some lot?ser DNA. This last notion is distasteful as I thzink you are right that the metrjcphaae chromosome should have a compact, and therefor% rsgular , structuru3. . . 'Ibours ever, .