pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of prosciProtein ScienceCSHL PressJournal HomeSubscriptionseTOC AlertsThe Protein Society
Protein Sci. 1997 December; 6(12): 2606–2616.
PMCID: PMC2143603
Simulating the minimum core for hydrophobic collapse in globular proteins.
J. Tsai, M. Gerstein, and M. Levitt
Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, California 94305-5126, USA.
J. Tsai: jotter/at/potential.stanford.edu
Abstract
To investigate the nature of hydrophobic collapse considered to be the driving force in protein folding, we have simulated aqueous solutions of two model hydrophobic solutes, methane and isobutylene. Using a novel methodology for determining contacts, we can precisely follow hydrophobic aggregation as it proceeds through three stages: dispersed, transition, and collapsed. Theoretical modeling of the cluster formation observed by simulation indicates that this aggregation is cooperative and that the simulations favor the formation of a single cluster midway through the transition stage. This defines a minimum solute hydrophobic core volume. We compare this with protein hydrophobic core volumes determined from solved crystal structures. Our analysis shows that the solute core volume roughly estimates the minimum core size required for independent hydrophobic stabilization of a protein and defines a limiting concentration of nonpolar residues that can cause hydrophobic collapse. These results suggest that the physical forces driving aggregation of hydrophobic molecules in water is indeed responsible for protein folding.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0M).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Akerström, B; Björck, L. A physicochemical study of protein G, a molecule with unique immunoglobulin G-binding properties. J Biol Chem. 1986 Aug 5;261(22):10240–10247. [PubMed]
  • Connolly, ML. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science. 1983 Aug 19;221(4612):709–713. [PubMed]
  • Dill, KA. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry. 1990 Aug 7;29(31):7133–7155. [PubMed]
  • Eliezer, D; Jennings, PA; Wright, PE; Doniach, S; Hodgson, KO; Tsuruta, H. The radius of gyration of an apomyoglobin folding intermediate. Science. 1995 Oct 20;270(5235):487–488. [PubMed]
  • Finney, JL. Volume occupation, environment and accessibility in proteins. The problem of the protein surface. J Mol Biol. 1975 Aug 25;96(4):721–732. [PubMed]
  • Gerstein, M; Tsai, J; Levitt, M. The volume of atoms on the protein surface: calculated from simulation, using Voronoi polyhedra. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jun 23;249(5):955–966. [PubMed]
  • Harpaz, Y; Gerstein, M; Chothia, C. Volume changes on protein folding. Structure. 1994 Jul 15;2(7):641–649. [PubMed]
  • KAUZMANN, W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv Protein Chem. 1959;14:1–63. [PubMed]
  • Levitt, M. Molecular dynamics of native protein. I. Computer simulation of trajectories. J Mol Biol. 1983 Aug 15;168(3):595–617. [PubMed]
  • Murzin, AG; Brenner, SE; Hubbard, T; Chothia, C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 7;247(4):536–540. [PubMed]
  • Privalov, PL; Gill, SJ. Stability of protein structure and hydrophobic interaction. Adv Protein Chem. 1988;39:191–234. [PubMed]
  • Rank, JA; Baker, D. A desolvation barrier to hydrophobic cluster formation may contribute to the rate-limiting step in protein folding. Protein Sci. 1997 Feb;6(2):347–354. [PubMed]
  • Richards, FM. The interpretation of protein structures: total volume, group volume distributions and packing density. J Mol Biol. 1974 Jan 5;82(1):1–14. [PubMed]
  • Wolfenden, R; Radzicka, A. On the probability of finding a water molecule in a nonpolar cavity. Science. 1994 Aug 12;265(5174):936–937. [PubMed]