FDA Logo links to FDA home pageCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationHHS Logo links to Department of Health and Human Services website

FDA Home Page | CDRH Home Page | Search | CDRH A-Z Index | Contact CDRH U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health [Skip navigation]
horizonal rule

Super Search
510(k) | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | PMA | Classification | CLIA
CFR Title 21 | Advisory Committees | Assembler | Recalls | Guidance | Standards
 

 

Adverse Event Report

COCHLEAR LTD. NUCLEUS 24 CHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM   back to search results
Model Number CI24M
Device Problem Device failure
Event Date 12/02/1998
Event Type  Malfunction  
Event Description

The patient's parent reported that the child was not responding to sound sensations. Using the appropriate diagnostic equipment, it was determined that the device is not functioning according to manufacturer's specifications. Explantation/reimplantation surgery had not been performed as of the date of this report.

 
Manufacturer Narrative

Additional method code: follow up info regarding this pt, who resides and was implanted outside of the usa, was requested but was not made available. This is the final report. Clinical summary: mother of 4 year-old boy reported on 28 november 1998 that her son was not reacting to sound anymore since he hit his head on the implant side that day. This had also caused a little non-bleeding injury - a blue spot on the skin covering the implant was still visible 4 days after the incident. Integrity test by cochlear staff on 2 december 1998 confirmed device failure - no output. Visual inspection: the stiffening ring s3 and the electrode ring e17 was observed to br crushed. The ball electrode was observed to be severed in two locations and had a number of bends. The electrode array was observed to be severed between the helix and the stiffening rings. The electrode array was observed to be kinked between the helix and the stiffening rings. The silicone covering the electrode array was observed to have a cut between th helix and the stiffening rings, exposing electrode wires. The stimulator case was observed to be dented on both the plate electrode and the logso sides. The silicone covering the stimulator body was observed to have a tear and a cut. X-ray of the unit revealed a crack on the ceramic hybrid circuit. The crack on the ceramic hybrid circuit was confirmed visually after opening the titanium case of the unit. Electrical tests: the unit failed the telemetry response test. The unit failed the reflected impedance test. Conclusion: the implant failed due to a cracked hybrid integrated circuit. Electrode damage were observed. It cannot be ruled out that the damages to the electrodes occurred during explantation as the investigation, including clincial evidence, did not yield any other probable cause.

 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  new search  |  submit an adverse event report

Brand NameNUCLEUS 24 CHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Type of Device24 CHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Baseline Brand NameNUCLEUS 24 COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Baseline Generic NameCOCHLEAR IMPLANT
Baseline Model NumberCI24M
Baseline Device FamilyCOCHLEAR IMPLANT
Baseline Device 510(K) Number
Baseline Device PMA NumberP840024
Baseline Shelf Life Information Yes
Baseline Preamendment? No
Transitional? No
510(K) Exempt? No
Shelf Life(Months)24
Date First Marketed06/25/1998
Manufacturer (Section F)
COCHLEAR LTD.
14 mars road
lane cove, nsw
AUSTRALIA 2066
Manufacturer (Section D)
COCHLEAR LTD.
14 mars road
lane cove, nsw
AUSTRALIA 2066
Manufacturer (Section G)
COCHLEAR LTD.
14 mars road
lane cove
AUSTRALIA NSW 2066
Manufacturer Contact
nancy fowler-brehm
61 inverness dr east
suite 200
englewood , CO 80112
(303) 790 -9010
Device Event Key195835
MDR Report Key201622
Event Key189405
Report Number6000034-1998-00115
Device Sequence Number1
Product CodeMCM
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device Was Involved in the Event
1 Patient Was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/11/1998
Is This An Adverse Event Report? No
Is This A Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device MODEL NumberCI24M
Was Device Available For Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/08/1999
Is The Reporter A Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Device Agena
Date Manufacturer Received12/07/1998
Was Device Evaluated By Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/01/1997
Is The Device Single Use? Yes
Is the Device an Implant? Yes
Is this an Explanted Device?
Type of Device Usage Initial

Database last updated on December 31, 2008

horizonal rule

CDRH Home Page | CDRH A-Z Index | Contact CDRH | Accessibility | Disclaimer
FDA Home Page | Search FDA Site | FDA A-Z Index | Contact FDA | HHS Home Page

Center for Devices and Radiological Health / CDRH