skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 086639  
Title: Child Snatching
Author(s): A Tresidder
Corporate Author: Oregon Legislative Research
United States
Sale: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States
Publication Date: 1981
Pages: 15
Origin: United States
Language: English
Note: Research Monograph
Annotation: Following an overview of child snatching, this monograph describes Oregon's laws relating to custodial interference, compares them with other State and Federal laws, and discusses Canada's judicial options.
Abstract: Parental kidnapping has been attributed to the exclusion of parents from Federal kidnapping laws, inconsistent enforcement of State laws, and frequent modification of one State's custody agreements by another State. The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act was drafted in 1968 to eliminate incentives for child snatching and has been adopted by 39 States including Oregon. This law, however, applies only to final decrees, does not provide for finding and returning the parent or child, and still allows States to assume jurisdiction and modify custody decrees. Oregon also has enacted criminal penalties for child snatching in Statutes 163.245 and 163.257, but critics contend that law enforcement agencies are reluctant to prosecute and prosecutors give custody cases low priority. To alleviate visitation problems which often contribute to child snatching, in 1977 Oregon enacted a law permitting joint custody. California has passed several laws to reduce child snatching through stiffer criminal penalties, encouraging joint custody, and using State agencies to locate abducted children. There is no uniform manner of statutorily addressing the issue, and States commonly adopt custodial interference laws. The 1981 Federal Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act requires States to accept custody decrees awarded by other States and allows the Federal Parent Locator Service to be used to find parents who kidnap their children. The Hague Conference on Private International Law has prepared a draft convention on international child abduction. In Canada, abduction of a child under 14 is punishable by a 10-year prison term. Courts can order a noncustodial parent to stay completely away from the child if he or she is interfering with the custody orders or find that someone charged with child snatching is either in contempt or in breach of a court order. The latter option is the most frequently exercised and may result in a fine or imprisonment. There is no law requiring one province to honor the custody decree of another. The paper includes 37 footnotes.
Index Term(s): State laws ; Child snatching ; Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act ; Uniform Child Custody Jurisdictn Act ; Oregon ; Canada
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=86639

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder