HYDRODYNAMIC AND WATER QUALITY 
MODELING FOR THE A.R.M. LOXAHATCHEE 
NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
PHASE 1: PREPARATION OF DATA
Task 1: Data Acquisition and Processing 
University of Louisiana at Lafayette 
Ehab A. Meselhe, PhD, PE 
Alonso G. Griborio, PhD, EI 
Shankar Gautam, MS, EI 
Report #LOXA05-014 
November 2005 

Table of Contents 
1. Introduction................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Objectives........................................................................................................ 2
2. Constituents to Be Modeled........................................................................................... 3
3. Period of Record........................................................................................................... 4
4. Types of Data................................................................................................................ 4
5. Procurement and Quality Assurance of Bathymetric Data.............................................. 5
5.1 Marsh Elevation Data...................................................................................... 5
5.2 Rim Canal Cross Section Data......................................................................... 8
6. Procurement and Quality Assurance of Water Level Data.............................................. 13
6.1 Interior Stations Stages.................................................................................... 13
6.2 Head and Tail Water Levels from Hydraulic Structures................................... 17
7. Procurement and Quality Assurance of Flow Data......................................................... 24
8. Procurement and Quality Assurance of Meteorological Data ......................................... 32
8.1 Rainfall Data.................................................................................................... 32
8.2 Evaporation and Potential Evapotranspiration Data.......................................... 35
8.3 Air Temperature Data...................................................................................... 36
8.4 Wind Data....................................................................................................... 38
9. Procurement and Quality Assurance of Water Quality Data........................................... 40
9.1 Water Quality Data.......................................................................................... 40
9.2 Total Phosphorus Data – EVPA Stations.......................................................... 41
9.3 Total Phosphorus Data – Enhanced Stations..................................................... 45
9.4 Total Phosphorus Data – XYZ Stations............................................................ 50
9.5 Total Phosphorus Data – Hydraulic Structure Stations ..................................... 54
9.6 Total Phosphorus Data – Additional Stations ................................................... 54
9.7 Chloride Data – EVPA Stations ....................................................................... 59
9.8 Chloride Data – Enhanced Stations .................................................................. 62
9.9 Chloride Data – XYZ Stations ......................................................................... 66
9.10 Chloride Data – Hydraulic Structure Stations ................................................. 70

9.11 Chloride Data – Additional Stations ............................................................... 74
10. Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................ 76
11. References................................................................................................................... 77
12. Appendices.................................................................................................................. 80
12.1 Appendix A: Stage Plots................................................................................ 80
12.2 Appendix B: Flow Plots................................................................................. 124
12.3 Appendix C: Rainfall Plots............................................................................ 166
12.4 Appendix D: Evaporation and ET Plots.......................................................... 186
12.5 Appendix E: Wind Plots................................................................................. 189
12.6 Appendix F: Water Quality Parameter Plots................................................... 195
12.7 Appendix G: Monthly Missing Data .............................................................. 242

List of Tables 
Table 1. Cross Section Information at L-7 and L-39 canal transects 10
Table 2. Cross Section Information at L-40 canal transects 11
Table 3. Available Interior Stage Data .............................................................................. 14
Table 4. Summary of Water Level Data Available at Interior Stations .............................. 16
Table 5. Available Head and Tail Water Level Data ......................................................... 18
Table 6. Summary of Head/Tail Water Level Data Available at Northern Hydraulic 
Structures......................................................................................................................... 20
Table 7. Summary of Head/Tail Water Level Data Available at Western Hydraulic 
Structures......................................................................................................................... 21
Table 8. Summary of Head/Tail Water Level Data Available at Southern Hydraulic 
Structures......................................................................................................................... 22
Table 9. Summary of Head/Tail Water Level Data Available at Eastern Hydraulic 
Structures......................................................................................................................... 23
Table 10. Available Flow Data ......................................................................................... 24
Table 11. Summary of Flow Data Available at Northern Hydraulic Structures.................. 26
Table 12. Summary of Flow Data Available at Western Hydraulic Structures................... 27
Table 13. Summary of Flow Data Available at Southern Hydraulic Structures.................. 28
Table 14. Summary of Flow Data Available at Eastern Hydraulic Structures .................... 29
Table 15. Cumulative Inflows and Outflows to the Loxahatchee Refuge for the Period 
that Goes from January 1995 to December 2004. Flow Through Water Control 
Structures 31
Table 16. Available Rainfall Data..................................................................................... 33
Table 17. Summary of Available Rainfall Data................................................................. 34
Table 18. Available Evaporation and Evapotranspiration Data.......................................... 35
Table 19. Available Wind Data......................................................................................... 38

Table 20. List of Water Quality Parameters Measured at EVAP Water Quality 
Monitoring Site. ................................................................................................................ 40
Table 21. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for the EVPA Stations ........... 43
Table 22. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for the "Enhanced" Stations ... 46
Table 23. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for the District Transect 
Monitoring Sites ("XYZ" Stations).................................................................................... 52
Table 24A. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for Monitoring Sites 
Located at the Hydraulic Structure Locations (Grab Samples) ........................................... 55
Table 24B. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for Monitoring Sites 
Located at the Hydraulic Structure Locations (Composite Samples) .................................. 57
Table 25. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for Additional Monitoring 
Sites Associated with the Refuge....................................................................................... 58
Table 26. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the EVPA Stations......................... 60
Table 27. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the “Enhanced” Stations ................ 63
Table 28. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the “XYZ” Stations........................ 67
Table 29. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the Monitoring Site at Hydraulic 
Structure Locations ........................................................................................................... 72
Table 30. Summary of Chloride Data Information for Additional Monitoring Sites 
Associated with the Refuge ............................................................................................... 75

List of Figures 
Figure 1. Loxahatchee Refuge 2003 USGS Bathymetric Data .......................................... 6 
Figure 2. North to South Ground Profile of the Loxahatchee Refuge ................................ 7
Figure 3. West to East Ground Profile of the Loxahatchee Refuge.................................... 7
Figure 4. Rim Canal Transects (IFAS Survey) .................................................................. 8
Figure 5. Cross Section for the L40-01 transect, indicating channel bottom and sediment 
surface elevation ............................................................................................................... 9
Figure 6. Sediment Surface Elevation and Channel Bottom Elevation for the Western 
Canals (L-7 and L-39) ....................................................................................................... 12
Figure 7. Sediment Surface Elevation and Channel Bottom Elevation for the Eastern 
Canal (L-40) ..................................................................................................................... 12
Figure 8. Water Regulation Schedule for Water Conservation Area 1............................... 13
Figure 9. USGS water level monitoring stations ............................................................... 14
Figure 10. Location of Hydraulic Structures in the Loxahatchee Refuge .......................... 17
Figure 11. Location of Rain Gages and Weather Stations ................................................. 33
Figure 12. Seasonal Variation of ET Estimated at STA1W ............................................... 36
Figure 13. LOXWS Air Temperature ............................................................................... 37
Figure 14. Average Monthly Temperature from 1995 to 2004 Observed at Weather 
Station LOXWS 37
Figure 15. Location of Wind Stations ............................................................................... 39
Figure 16. Location of Water Quality Monitoring Sites Inside The Refuge ....................... 41
Figure 17. Location of the EVPA Water Quality Monitoring Sites.................................... 42
Figure 18. Location of the “Enhanced” Water Quality Monitoring Sites ........................... 45
Figure 19. Location of the “XYZ” Water Quality Monitoring Sites .................................. 50

Figure 20. TP Arithmetic Means at Refuge Transect Stations with Increasing Distance 
from the Rim Canal........................................................................................................... 51
Figure 21. TP Geometric Means at Refuge Transect Stations with Increasing Distance 
Figure 26. Cl and TP Arithmetic Means at Refuge Transect Stations with Increasing 
Figure 27. TP Geometric Means at Refuge Transect Stations with Increasing Distance 
Figure 30. TP vs. Cl Arithmetic Means at Monitoring Sites Associated with the 
Figure 31. TP vs. Cl Geometric Means at Monitoring Sites Associated with the 
from the Rim Canal........................................................................................................... 51
Figure 22. TP vs. Cl Arithmetic Means at EVPA Stations................................................. 59
Figure 23. TP vs. Cl Geometric Means at EVPA Stations ................................................. 59
Figure 24. TP vs. Cl Arithmetic Means at “Enhanced” Stations ........................................ 62
Figure 25. TP vs. Cl Geometric Means at “Enhanced” Stations ........................................ 62
Distance from the Rim Canal ............................................................................................ 66
from the Rim Canal........................................................................................................... 69
Figure 28. TP vs. Cl Arithmetic Means at “XYZ” Stations ............................................... 69
Figure 29. TP vs. Cl Geometric Means at “XYZ” Stations................................................ 70
Hydraulic Structures.......................................................................................................... 71
Hydraulic Structures.......................................................................................................... 71

Task 1: Data Acquisition and Processing 
1. Introduction
It is well known and documented that changes in water quantity, timing and quality are 
introducing negative impacts to the Everglades ecosystem (Richardson et al., 1990; 
Walker, 1991 and 1995; Davis et al., 1994; Ligth and Dineen, 1994; McCormick et al., 
1996; USFWS, 2000; Brandt et al., 2000; Raghunathan et al., 2001; Childers et al., 2003). 
Historically, the Kissimmee River discharged into Lake Okeechobee, and during wet 
cycles the lake would overflow its south bank, providing additional flow to the 
Everglades (Ligth and Dineen, 1994). Water, which once flowed in a broad swath across 
the Everglades, is now concentrated through canals, structures, and a series of water 
storage areas (Water Conservation Areas (WCA)). That water, when not used for 
municipal water supply or irrigation, is discharged to the Everglades National Park 
(ENP). 
According to the Comprehensive Conservation Plan for the Refuge (USFWS, 2000) “the 
construction of the levees has had significant effects on the hydrology, vegetation and 
wildlife in the refuge.” The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, 2000) indicated 
that changes in natural timing of water levels affect wading birds feeding patterns, apple 
snail reproductive output, and alligator nesting. Similarly, changes in the spatial 
distribution of water levels alter the distribution of aquatic vegetation and tree islands. In 
addition, and particularly during the dry season, lower water levels increase the potential 
for fire and damage to vegetation, soils and wildlife. The USFWS in partnership with the 
South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the U.S. Corps of Engineers 
are devoting considerable resources to restore and maintain appropriate water regimes for 
the Refuge. 
Along with the changes in water quantity and timing, the changes in water quality are an 
important threat to the Everglades ecosystem. High concentrations of nutrients 
(specifically phosphorus) in runoff from agricultural areas cause proliferation of cattails, 
and other undesirable species that negatively affect the ecosystem’s balance. Other 
negative impacts from increased nutrients include: increased soil phosphorus content, 
changed periphyton communities, loss of native sawgrass communities, increased organic 
matter in water, reduced dissolved oxygen, conversion of wet prairie plant communities 
to cattail, and loss of important habitats for wading birds (Stober et al., 1996). 
Along with ensuring an appropriate water regulation schedule, it is a priority for the 
Refuge to better understand and minimize the impacts of these excessive nutrient 
loadings. The purpose of the planned Refuge hydrodynamic and water quality modeling 
is to provide a quantitative framework for management decisions related to Refuge 
inflow and outflow quantity, timing, and quality. This modeling effort will provide 
projections of water movement and water quality resulting under alternative scenarios of 
structure operation, Storm Treatment Area (STA) performance, and structural changes 
within the Refuge. When fully calibrated and validated, the selected model should 

provide information and assist in answering questions on the hydrologic, hydrodynamic, 
water quality, and ecologic processes occurring under present conditions and 
management rules; and how these processes would be altered by different structural 
changes and management scenarios. For example: How different management scenarios 
(structural alterations, management decisions, strategies, and regulations) alter: 
o The hydrology. How will the spatial and temporal distribution of water 
inside the Refuge be altered? Will portions dry out and for how long? Is 
significant surface-groundwater interaction in the Refuge occurring? If so, 
what are the effects? 
o The hydrodynamics. How will near field hydrodynamics close to 
hydraulic structures be altered? How will far field current patterns be 
altered? 
o Water quality. How will water quality be altered? How will the spatial 
and temporal distribution of phosphorous inside the Refuge be altered? 
o The ecosystem. How will the ecosystem be affected by changes in 
hydrology? Will local changes in hydroperiod sustain the needs of desired 
plants and wildlife? 
It should be emphasized that the numerical model that will be developed is not a regional 
model. Therefore, it will not project the response of the natural system outside the 
Refuge’s boundaries to any alternations. It will however, provide detailed information 
about the response of the Refuge to regional management changes and alterations. 
This report focuses on data acquisition and processing, starting with the selection of the 
water quality constituents to be modeled and the selection of periods of records for 
calibration and validation. It assesses whether sufficient data is available to achieve the 
modeling goals. It also provides recommendation for monitoring where additional data is 
needed. The description of the Refuge’s background, hydrology, soils, physiographic, 
water management and regulation, as well as a comprehensive literature review of 
previous modeling efforts within the Refuge and wetland systems, will be presented in 
companion reports. 
1.1 Objectives
As indicated in the previous paragraph the main goals of this report are: 
• Identify the period of record for calibration and validation of the numerical 
model. 
• Identify the constituents to be modeled. 
• Compile the data needed to support the modeling effort. 
• Check the quality and resolution of the gathered data. 
• Determine if sufficient data is available to achieve the modeling goals. 

2. Constituents to Be Modeled 
Since the everglades are oligotrophic-phosphorus limited systems (Childers et al., 2003; 
McCormick et al., 1996; Raghunathan et al., 2001; SFWMD, 2000), the discharge of 
excess amount of this nutrient will promote the eutrophication process and ecosystem 
imbalance, e.g., shifts in plant community composition. The 2000 Everglades 
Consolidated Report (2000 ECR) by the SFWMD indicated that the ratio of total nitrogen 
to total phosphorus (TN:TP) in the Refuge, increased from near 50:1 in the canal to near 
150:1 in the marsh interior. Since values of TN:TP higher than 8:1 suggests phosphorus 
(P) limitation, the ratios for the Refuge are a clear indication that: (1) P is the more 
important limiting nutrient in both the marsh and canal waters; and (2) the severity of P 
limitation increases with increasing distance from the canal. The USFWS (2000) 
indicated that areas in the western, southwestern, southern and southeastern portions of 
the Refuge continue to be eutrophied by the influx of high nutrients runoff (specifically 
phosphorus) from agricultural lands. The hydrodynamic and water quality models being 
developed will be of value in testing this conjecture. 
According to Childers et al. (2003) water column total phosphorus concentrations in the 
Everglades are typically less than 10 mg/L. It is well documented that water flowing into 
the Everglades has an anthropogenic load of nutrients and other contaminants (e.g., 
Richardson et al., 1990, Stober et al., 1996; USFWS, 2000). Nutrient loading from urban 
areas and the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) has significantly increased nutrient 
concentrations, particularly phosphorus, in the water conservation areas (USFWS, 2000). 
Childers et al. (2003) reported that in northern Everglades regions, near to the EAA, total 
phosphorus concentrations often exceed 100 mg/L. Therefore, it is a priority for the 
Refuge to better understand the dynamics of nutrients on the systems, particularly of 
phosphorus, in order to minimize the impacts of this excessive nutrient’s loading. Total 
phosphorus in the sediments and in the water column is going to be modeled as a 
constituent in order to address this objective. 
It is important to accurately describe the hydrodynamic processes in order to determine 
and evaluate water quality impacts on wetlands (Mitsch, 1988; Mitsch and Reeder, 1991; 
Moustafa and Hamrick, 2000). The accurate description of the hydrodynamic often 
requires fine-tuning of certain model parameters, i.e., calibration, to match observed and 
predicted values, e.g., water surface elevations, water depths, water velocities, 
constituents’ concentrations, etc. After calibration, a validation process is usually 
conducted to ensure the model accuracy. However, the validation of velocities and 
transport subroutines are often not completed primarily due to lack of field 
measurements. 
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are no velocity measurements anywhere in 
the Loxahatchee Refuge. Therefore, a recommendation will be made to Refuge personnel 
to collect surface flow velocities in the rim canal as well as at interior sites. Although, the 
ability to model advection and diffusion can be assessed through modeling of 
conservative constituents, if deviation from the field measurements is observed, it would 
not be possible to determine whether the deviation is caused by error in the model’s 

advection or by the diffusion terms. It is believed that even a short term measurement of 
velocities at multiple locations within the Refuge will be of great value to this modeling 
effort. 
Traditionally, conductivity, total dissolved solids (TDS) and chloride have been used as 
conservative or semi-conservative tracers. Conductivity and TDS are highly correlated, 
and even though they are not fully conservative parameters, they can be used as such 
when high concentrations are present in the influent runoff/wastewater, assuming that 
wetlands have a negligible effect on these parameters. Kadlec and Knight (1996) 
indicated that wetlands have minimal effect on TDS. This is especially true because TDS 
concentrations are usually high in wastewaters and the individual components of these 
solids greatly exceed the biological requirements for growth. Kadlec and Knight (1996) 
recommended the use of chloride content as a tracer in wetland systems. They indicated 
that due to low biological demand, its abundance in surface water and its high solubility, 
the total mass of chlorine remains relatively constant in wetland systems. Based on this 
recommendation, the initial approach in this modeling effort will be to use chloride as 
tracer to evaluate the model transport subroutine. 
3. Period of Record 
Some of the processes and transformations that occur in wetland systems sometimes take 
years. An example of a long term process is the shift in plant community composition 
that may occur after the accumulation and/or release of phosphorus in the soil. These 
factors underline the need to perform long-term simulations. 
An ideal period-of-record (POR) covers a large number of years with periods of extreme 
meteorological and hydrological conditions that adequately calibrate and test the model 
performance. It is also of value to have a POR that includes major structural changes (e.g. 
diversion of S-6 pump, STA-1E operation) because this further tests the models ability to 
project such changes. It is desirable to select a POR ending as close as practical to the 
present. The POR for model calibration and possible verification should consider data 
availability, and quality. This task will require a preliminary review of data from various 
sources. Accordingly, a tentative POR is selected to be 1995 – 2004. This period will be 
further divided into two segments where one will be used for model calibration, and the 
other for validation. This report summarizes the types of data that have been collected for 
the POR, identifying any missing periods and indicating the apparent quality of such 
data. 
4. Types of Data 
The field measurements needed to support this modeling effort include bathymetric, 
meteorological, hydrologic, and water quality data. Many of these datasets are spatially 
variable (e.g., elevation), and some are both temporally and spatially variable such as all 
meteorological, hydrologic, and water quality parameters. Data sources will be identified 

for all data types required. The types of data that have been compiled and are discussed 
in this report are: 
• Bathymetric data 
• Hydrologic data: water level and discharges through hydraulic structures 
• Meteorological data: rainfall, temperature, evapotranspiration (ET), and wind 
• Water quality data: concentrations of the parameters of interest at available 
sampling sites. 
5. Procurement and Quality Assurance of Bathymetric Data 
5.1 Marsh Elevation Data
Bathymetric surveys for the Loxahatchee Refuge have been available from different 
sources and with different resolution. Lin and Gregg (1988) indicated that, in 1988, 
topographic maps of the Refuge were available from three different sources: (1) the U.S. 
Army Corps of Engineers (1958), (2) the Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of 
Interior (1963 and 1965), and (3) the South Florida Water Management District (1965). 
Lin and Gregg (1988) reported that, in some areas, there were considerable differences 
between the three sources. A later survey of the Refuge was conducted by Richardson et 
al. (1990) who collected topographic and vegetation cover data, as part of their study of 
refuge habitats and relationship to water quality, quantity and hydroperiod. The 
topographic data was collected at a resolution of approximately 1 minute (roughly 2 Km) 
by measuring the water depth at all grid locations and then subtracting from an assumed 
horizontal water level. A flat pool condition of water in the Refuge was obtained by 
holding water at the 17-foot level during the time that the grid survey was being 
conducted. 
The latest elevation data for the Refuge are available from the United State Geological 
Survey (USGS). The elevation data were collected as “bare earth” ground elevation on a 
400 by 400 meter grid. "Bare earth" in the Everglades swamp environment is considered 
to be the layer of "muck" which supports a one-pound weight on a bearing surface of 
approximately 5.3 square inches or 2.6-inch circle. According to Desmond (2003) the 
horizontal positions were established by GPS observations and are referenced to the 
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). The horizontal accuracy is +/- 15 centimeters. 
Similarly, the elevation data have a vertical accuracy specification of +/-15 centimeters 
(cm) relative to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). Desmond 
(2003) indicated that the vertical accuracy of the elevation data was determined based on 
the requirements for use as input to hydrologic models. More information about this 
elevation data is available at the USGS’s South Florida Information Access (SOFIA) 
website (http://sofia.usgs.gov/projects/elev_data/). Since the water level data from the 
Refuge interior stations and from the water management structures are based on the 
National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD29), the USGS’s bathymetric data were 
converted from the NAVD88 to the NGVD29 system using the National Geodetic Survey 

software “VERTCON” Version 2.1. Figure 1 shows the bathymetric contours for the 
Loxahatchee Refuge based on the USGS’s data. 
Results of this survey indicate that, in the Refuge, the bathymetry contours (excluding the 
rim channel) range from 18.50 to 10.61 ft (5.64 to 3.23 m) NGVD29, with a mean 
elevation of about 15.17 ft (4.62 m) NGVD29. 
Figure 1. Loxahatchee Refuge 2003 USGS Bathymetric Data 
As can be observed in the profile presented in Figure 2, the Refuge has a very mild north 
to south slope, which results in a generally slow southward flow movement. Lin (1979) 
indicated that flow through the heavily vegetated area in the Refuge is extremely slow as 
compared to the flow in canals. The north to south slope is estimated to be about 1.6 cm 
in 1 Km (1.0 inches per mile). In the west to east direction (see Figure 3), the terrain is 
undulated showing mounds and depressions, but with basically an average horizontal 
slope. 

10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
Ground Elevation (ft NGVD29)
Average Slope = 
0.085 ft/mile 
Overland Surface 
0 2 4 6 8 1012141618202224
Distance from Point A (miles) 
Figure 2. North to South Ground Profile of the Loxahatchee Refuge 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
Ground Elevation (ft NGVD29)
Average Slope = 
0.004 ft/mile Overland Surface 
0 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 91011121314
Distance from Point C (miles) 
Figure 3. West to East Ground Profile of the Loxahatchee Refuge 

5.2 Rim Canal Cross-Section Data 
The rim canal bathymetric data were collected by the University of Florida’s Institute of 
Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS), specifically by the Everglades Research and 
Education Center. This survey of the rim canal was performed in 2001 by Daroub et al. 
(2002) as part of the project: Implementation and Verification of Best Management 
Practices for Reducing Loading in the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA). The survey 
was conducted by measuring sediment depth and channel bottom depth with reference to 
the transect’s surface water level at the time of the measurement. The water depths were 
later converted to elevations using the mean tail-water elevation of station G-310 
(referenced to NGVD29) that prevailed on the day of measurement. It was assumed that 
there was no hydraulic gradient between G-310 and the transects at the time of 
measurement. Sediment samples and cross section elevations were taken approximately 
at one-mile resolution. The transect locations of the survey are shown in Figure 4. 
Figure 4. Rim Canal Transects (IFAS Survey) 
Twenty eight transects were taken for each canal system, i.e., the western system that is 
formed by the L-7 and L-39 canals and the eastern system that is formed by the L-40 

canal. The distance between transects ranges between 1.15 and 0.90 miles for the 
western system and between 1.03 and 0.92 miles for the L-40 canal, being the average 
distance equal to 1.0 mile for both systems. As indicated before, sediment surface levels 
and channel bottom levels were measured, and were standardized with the G-310 tailwater 
elevation as reference level. The G-310 tail-water level is based on the National 
Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD29). Figure 5 shows the cross section elevations for the 
L40-01 transect. 
L40-01 Penetrometer Data 
Elevation (ft NGVD29) 
06/27/01 
18 
16 
14 
12 
10 
8 
6 
4 
2 
0 
-2 
-4 
-6 
-8
-10
-12
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 
Sediment Surface 
Channel Bottom 
Marsh Elevation 
Levee 
Distance from Near Side (ft) (SW to NE) 
Figure 5. Cross Section for the L40-01 transect, indicating channel bottom and sediment 
surface elevation (Reproduced after Daroub et al., 2005). 
For the western canals, the sediment surface elevations range between 7.0 and -1.5 ft 
NGVD29 with a mean elevation equal to 2.4 ft. For the L-40 canal, the sediment surface 
elevations range between 6.7 and -5.7 ft NGVD29 with a mean elevation equal to 3.2 ft. 
The top width ranges between 205 and 120 ft for the western canal, and between 173 and 
88 ft for the L-40 canal, the mean top widths are 169.7 and 121.5 ft for the western and 
for the L-40 canals, respectively. Table 1 summarizes the transects’ information for the 
L-7 and L-39 canals, and Table 2 summarizes the information for the L-40 canal. 

Table 1. Cross Section Information at L-7 and L-39 canal transects. 
Cross 
Section 
Label 
Easting 
m 
Northingm Canal Mile 
Sediment 
Surface Elev. 
ft 
Channel 
Bottom Elev.
ft 
Top Width 
ft 
Average 
Sediment 
Depth 
ft 
L7-16 561525 2950503 0.00 0.87 -8.71 180 10.06 
L7-15 560710 2949311 0.90 4.62 -2.04 180 6.48 
L7-14 559806 2947996 1.89 4.12 -5.54 190 10.23 
L7-13 558869 2946632 2.92 4.10 -5.98 175 9.45 
L7-12 557955 2945304 3.92 4.19 -2.56 190 7.23 
L7-11 557046 2943980 4.92 4.77 -3.48 195 6.66 
L7-10 556140 2942659 5.91 3.85 -3.90 190 6.15 
L7-01 555256 2941284 6.93 2.51 1.93 177 2.53 
L7-02 555256 2939521 8.02 1.68 -1.15 185 2.74 
L7-03 555255 2937953 9.00 2.10 -0.65 200 3.69 
L7-04 555262 2936357 9.99 2.51 -1.15 175 3.01 
L7-05 555260 2934769 10.98 3.93 0.51 195 3.75 
L7-06 555259 2933103 12.01 3.01 1.18 195 3.19 
L7-07 555263 2931591 12.95 3.56 0.22 195 4.10 
L7-08 555262 2930066 13.90 3.81 -1.11 205 5.15 
L7-09 555315 2928408 14.93 4.31 1.81 180 3.43 
L39-01 556127 2926741 16.08 -1.28 -3.11 165 1.66 
L39-02 557056 2925424 17.08 -0.69 -3.19 155 1.97 
L39-03 557976 2924112 18.08 -0.47 -4.38 165 3.00 
L39-04 558916 2922783 19.09 -1.47 -3.97 159 3.28 
L39-05 559831 2921482 20.08 -1.22 -3.72 163 3.45 
L39-06 560773 2920146 21.09 -0.97 -4.30 165 5.23 
L39-07 561734 2918793 22.13 2.78 -0.72 149 2.73 
L39-08 562717 2917596 23.09 7.02 -0.73 124 3.94 
L39-09 564220 2917145 24.06 2.18 -1.32 135 2.70 
L39-10 565732 2916662 25.05 2.52 -2.07 120 3.07 
L39-11 567273 2916163 26.06 2.02 -1.73 120 2.88 
L39-12 568804 2915664 27.06 2.52 0.60 125 1.87 
The thalweg profiles for the sediment surface elevations and for the channel bottom 
elevations are presented in Figures 6 and 7, for the L-7/L39 canals and for the L-40 canal, 
respectively. The profiles for the L/7/L-39 canals are quite irregular with almost a 
horizontal average slope. Channel aggradation seems to have occurred in the L-7 canal as 
results of an adverse slope in the channel bed; for this canal the sediment depths vary 
between 10.2 and 2.5 ft with an average depth of approximately 5.5 ft. It is important to 
note two other major features in these profiles: a thalweg drop of more than 4 ft between 
canal miles 15 and 16, close to the confluence of the L-7 and L-39 canals; and a steep 
adverse slope with great accumulation of sediments between canal miles 21 and 23 in the 
L-39 canal. On the other hand, the profile for the L-40 canal is better defined with a north 
to south mild slope of about 3.2 inches per mile, see Figure 7. The sediment depths for 
the L-40 canal range between 6.6 and 0.9 ft with and average depth equal to 3.0 ft. 
Another interesting observation to the canal data is the difference of more than 8 ft on 

sediment elevations for the downstream ends of L-39 and L-40 canals, when these points 
are only about 1.7 miles apart. 
Table 2. Cross Section Information at L-40 canal transects. 
Cross 
Section 
Label 
Easting 
m 
Northingm Canal Mile 
Sediment 
Surface Elev. 
ft 
Channel 
Bottom Elev.
ft 
Top Width 
ft 
Average 
Sediment 
Depth 
ft 
L40-28 563533 2950633 0.00 3.92 -1.00 145 4.21 
L40-27 564165 2949288 0.92 4.08 -5.08 135 6.65 
L40-26 564832 2947867 1.90 4.25 -4.58 145 6.55 
L40-25 565882 2946594 2.92 5.08 -2.17 150 6.03 
L40-24 567106 2945548 3.92 6.10 1.77 132 4.57 
L40-23 568472 2944658 4.94 3.60 -1.56 88 3.01 
L40-22 569828 2943776 5.94 4.94 3.02 89 2.26 
L40-21 571184 2942902 6.95 5.77 -0.15 100 3.10 
L40-20 572296 2941771 7.93 6.69 1.60 95 3.38 
L40-19 573252 2940467 8.94 5.70 2.53 95 1.79 
L40-18 574218 2939160 9.95 5.95 2.45 105 2.04 
L40-17 575159 2937830 10.96 5.53 -1.22 100 3.26 
L40-16 576031 2936473 11.96 5.45 3.28 104 1.68 
L40-15 576694 2935015 12.96 5.28 -1.22 98 3.86 
L40-14 577228 2933471 13.97 4.70 2.53 98 1.22 
L40-13 577509 2931864 14.98 4.78 1.95 117 1.79 
L40-12 577535 2930277 15.97 3.57 -0.43 113 2.67 
L40-11 577579 2928671 16.97 3.71 -0.13 125 2.09 
L40-10 577443 2927070 17.97 3.04 1.79 129 1.42 
L40-09 577077 2925495 18.97 1.12 -2.71 125 2.70 
L40-08 576718 2923953 19.96 0.46 -4.71 123 2.90 
L40-07 576361 2922404 20.94 -1.46 -5.38 120 2.96 
L40-06 576090 2920841 21.93 0.46 -1.38 130 1.46 
L40-05 576115 2919246 22.92 1.36 -0.48 129 1.34 
L40-04 575529 2917746 23.92 1.19 -0.23 125 0.89 
L40-03 574601 2916419 24.93 -0.65 -6.98 145 1.98 
L40-02 573007 2916279 25.92 0.11 -5.31 168 3.21 
L40-01 571396 2916240 26.92 -5.73 -9.90 173 4.01 

-12 
-10 
-8 
-6 
-4 
-2 
0 
2 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
Elevation (ft NGVD29)
L-7 Canal L-39 Canal 
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 
Canal Mile 
Sed. Surf. Ele. Channel Bot. Elev. 
Figure 6. Thalweg Profiles for the Sediment Surface Elevation and Channel Bottom 
Elevation for the Western Canals (L-7 and L-39) 
-12 
-10 
-8 
-6 
-4 
-2 
0 
2 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
Elevation (ft NGVD29) 
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 
Canal Mile 
Sed. Surf. Ele. Channel Bot. Elev. 
Figure 7. Thalweg Profiles for the Sediment Surface Elevation and Channel Bottom 
Elevation for the Eastern Canal (L-40) 

6. Procurement and Quality Assurance of Water Level Data 
6.1 Interior Station Stages 
The water levels in the Loxahatchee Refuge change due to drought, rainfall, 
evapotranspiration, seepage, and surface water management based on regulation 
schedules that vary with the time of the year, hydrologic, and other needs (SFWMD, 
2005). According to the USFWS (2000) the purpose of these schedules is to regulate the 
water level in WCA-1 to produce maximum benefits for flood control, water supply, fish 
and wildlife, and prevention of salt water intrusion. A schematic diagram of the current 
water regulation schedule (established in May 2005) is shown in Figure 8. 
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
Water Elevation (NGVD feet) 
ZONE A1 
ZONE B 
Water releases, as needed, depending upon elevation at Lake Okeechobee 
Active ZONE A2 
Water releases 
linked to amount of 
rainfall and elevation 
at Lake Okeechobee 
ZONE C 
No net water releases due to drought 
w ater releases, due to flood conditions 
JanuaryFebruaryMarch 
April 
MayJune 
JulyAugust
SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember 
Figure 8. Water Regulation Schedule for Water Conservation Area 1 (Reproduced after 
Comprehensive Conservation Plan for the Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, 
USFWS, 2000) 
Spatial water level information inside the Refuge is scarce. Actually there are only five 
active stations inside the Refuge, two of them in operation just after mid 2001. These five 
stations are referred as 1-7, 1-9, 1-8T, North and South. The location of USGS’s water 
level monitoring stations is shown in Figure 9. Historic daily average water level data 
from 1954 to 2005 are available at USGS sites 1-7, 1-9, and 1-8C, although the site 1-8C 
is located in the rim canal. The stage-monitoring site 1-8T has water level measurements 
since 1979. Water level data from recently installed USGS sites North and South are 
available only after June, 2001. The water level data can be obtained at the SFWMD’s 

Environmental Data Base (DBHYDRO) website (www.sfwmd.gov/org/ema/dbhydro/). 
Table 3 shows the available and missing data for each of these stations for the POR. A 
more detailed description of the interior stage missing data is presented in Appendix G.1. 
Figure 9. USGS water level monitoring stations 
Table 3. Available Interior Stage Data 
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Start Date End Date Total Continuous 
1-7 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 0 0 
1-8T 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 7 3 
1-8C 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 88 88 
1-9 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 0 0 
North 6/26/2001 12/31/2004 24 6 
South 5/11/2001 12/31/2004 27 6 
Missing Data Days 
from Available PeriodStation 
Available Data Available Data 
Note: In this Table and in the rest of the document the data reported yearly correspond to 
a calendar year (if it is not otherwise indicated). 

The DBHYDRO database usually presents more than one time series available for each 
gage. For the selected POR (1995 to 2004), there are between 3 and 5 different time 
series available for each of the sites 1-7, 1-8T, 1-8C and 1-9. Most of these time series 
data sets have overlapping time periods. There is no explanation at the website about this 
issue, however, the DBHYDRO browser user documentation manual recommends that 
“whenever "PREF" data are available for a date record of interest it should be used to 
exclusion of all other data” since “such data sets already underwent a second level of 
quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) by engineers in Environmental 
Monitoring and Assessment Division” (SFWMD, 2003). Since not all the stations include 
a “PREF” file or the “PREF” file does not always cover the complete period of interest, 
all the time series available were retrieved from the DBHYDRO website and compared 
against each other. Appendix A1, Figures A1.1 to A1.22, shows the time series available 
for each gage and also the comparisons between them. Table 4 shows the names of the 
time series available for each gage, and also the time series that were selected to be used 
during the Refuge modeling effort. This table also indicates the arithmetic means of daily 
average water levels for the POR, and the maximum and minimum daily average stages 
reported during such period. The major observations to the time series, as well as any 
modification to the data, are also reported in Table 4. 
For the POR, the arithmetic means of daily average water levels for the interior stations 
(1-7, 1-8T, and 1-9) range between 16.55 and 16.26 ft NGVD29, and the maximum and 
minimum daily average stages are 18.12 and 13.94 ft NGVD29, respectively. For gage 18C 
(located in the rim canal) the arithmetic mean of daily average water level is 16.31 ft 
NGVD29, and the maximum and minimum daily average stages are 18.19 and 12.06 ft 
NGVD29, respectively. Gage North presents a higher average stage (16.73 ft NGVD29) 
than the rest of the stations, and gages South has a lower average stage (16.10 ft 
NGVD29), but these stations only have data for the period from May 2001 to December 
2004. 

Table 4. Summary of Water Level Data Available at Interior Stations 
Available Data Time Series Time Series to Data Information (ft, NGVD 29) 
Gage Start End Availables be used Average Maximum Minimum Observations/Modifications to data 
File 7627 was discarded for comparison due to the short period it covers. Files 
15808 and FE775 are very similar (Maximum difference is 0.12 ft, and average 
7627, 15808, difference is 0.01 ft) 
1-7 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 FE775 FE775 16.55 18.12 14.88 There are 15 days of apparently inconsistent data from 18/10/95 to 11/01/95 
7637, 15809, File 7637 was discarded for comparison due to the short period it covers. Files 
1-8T 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 P1031 P1031+15809 16.26 18.03 13.94 15809 and P10315 are identical 
Files 5400 and 7636 were discarded for comparison due to the short period they 
cover. The files 15810, FE776 and P1030 are very similar, but FE776 was selected 
5400, 7636, because it is the PREF file. The minimum stage equal to 12.06 ft corresponds to an 
15810, FE776, "extreme event" on May 2001. There is a long period of missing data (88 
1-8C 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 P1030 FE776 16.31 18.19 12.06 consecutive days from 9/5/04 to 12/1/04) in all the files 
File 7628 was discarded for comparison due to the short period it covers. Files 
15811, FE777 and P1032 are very similar (average difference is 0.003 ft, and the 
7628, 15811, maximum difference is 0.15 ft). FE777 was selected because it covers the complete 
1-9 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 FE777, P1032 FE777 16.35 17.90 14.78 period without missing data, and is the PREF file 
North 6/26/2001 12/31/2004 RW494 RW494 16.73 18.00 15.67 Only one file is available 
South 5/11/2001 12/31/2004 MW671 MW671 16.10 17.27 14.23 Only one file is available 

6.2 Head and Tail Water Levels from Hydraulic Structures 
Head-water and tail-water stage data, for the hydraulic structures associated with the 
Refuge, are also available from the DBHYDRO website. These data are essential for 
documenting the spatial and temporal stage variations along the rim canal. The water 
level data for the hydraulic structures were divided into four groups according to the 
structure location: a) the northern stations, this group includes structures S-5A, S-5AS, 
G-301 and G-300; b) the western stations, this group includes structures G-310, G-251, 
S-6, S-10E and G-338; c) the southern stations, structures S-10D, S-10C, S-10A and S-39 
are included in this group; and d) the eastern stations, structures S-362, ACME-1, 
ACME-2 or G-94D, G-94C, G-94B and G-94A are included in this group. Figure 10 
shows the location of the hydraulic structures associated with the Refuge. 
Figure 10. Location of Hydraulic Structures in the Loxahatchee Refuge 
Table 5 shows the available head- and tail-water level data for the nineteen hydraulic 
structures around the Refuge. As can be observed in the table, not all the structures were 
in operation from the start date of the POR. For example, structures G-301 and G-300 
started operating in August 1999 (Waldon, 2005). Structure G-310 started operating on 

July 2000 (Waldon, 2005). On the other hand, the structures located at the eastern part of 
the Refuge (ACME-1, G-94D, G-94C, G-94B and G-94A) were in operation for the 
complete POR. For these stations, the time series available at the DBHYDRO website are 
missing between 57 and 89 months with respect to their head and tail water levels, while 
some stations do not have head water levels available (see Table 5). The investigators are 
continuing to search for the missing data. 
Head and Tail water level data for the stations S-10D, S-10C and S10-A is also available 
at the USGS website (http://water.usgs.gov/data.html). A more detailed description of the head 
and tail water level missing data is presented in Appendix G.2. 
Table 5. Available Head and Tail Water Level Data 
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Start Date End Date Total Continuous 
HW 01/01/95 12/31/04 0 0 
TW 01/01/95 12/31/04 0 0 
HW 01/01/95 09/30/04 0 0 
TW 01/01/95 12/31/04 0 0 
HW 11/02/99 12/31/04 0 0 
TW 11/02/99 12/31/04 0 0 
HW 08/26/99 12/27/04 0 0 
TW 08/26/99 12/31/04 0 0 
HW 07/07/00 07/31/03 0 0 
TW 07/07/00 12/31/04 0 0 
HW 01/01/95 12/31/04 14 14 
TW 01/01/95 12/31/04 10 10 
HW 01/01/95 12/31/04 0 0 
TW 01/01/95 12/31/04 0 0 
HW 01/01/95 12/31/04 0 0 
TW 01/01/95 12/31/04 20 19 
HW 03/19/02 12/31/04 0 0 
TW 03/19/02 12/31/04 0 0 
HW 01/01/95 12/31/04 58 16 
TW 01/01/95 12/31/04 106 15 
HW 01/01/95 12/31/04 14 9 
TW 01/01/95 12/31/04 22 7 
HW 01/01/95 12/31/04 74 12 
TW 01/01/95 12/31/04 106 23 
HW 01/01/95 12/31/04 21 21 
TW 01/01/95 12/31/04 1 1 
HW 10/14/04 12/31/04 0 0 
TW 10/14/04 12/31/04 0 0 
HW 09/09/99 12/31/04 10 8 
TW 09/09/99 12/31/04 8 6 
HW 09/08/99 12/31/04 9 9 
TW 09/08/99 12/31/04 9 9 
HW 06/03/02 12/31/04 7 7 
TW 01/18/00 12/31/04 24 10 
HW 
TW 01/18/00 12/31/04 40 12 
HW 
TW 01/18/00 12/31/04 40 12S-5A 
S-5AS 
G-94A 
G-94D 
S-10A 
S-39 
ACME#1 
S-6 
S-10E 
S-362 
G-338 
Available DataStation 
Available DataData 
Type 
G-94C 
G-94B 
G-300 
G-301 
G-310 
G-251 
S-10D 
S-10C 
Missing Data Days from 
Available Period 
Head water data are available for this period 
Tail water data are available for this period 
Structure was in operation but data are not available 
Structure was not in operation during this period 

As in the case of the interior stations, the DBHYDRO database sometimes shows more 
than one time series available for the same station (see Tables 6 to 9); unfortunately, for 
the head/tail water levels there were not “PREF” files available. The time series available 
for each station, as well as the comparison among them, are included in Appendix A2, 
Figures A2.1 to A2.66. Data for the S-362 station is only available after 10/14/2004, and 
therefore the head and tail water levels time series for this station were not included in the 
appendices. Tables 6 to 9 summarize the major observations to the head and tail water 
level data, and also indicate the time series recommended to be used for the modeling 
effort. If not otherwise indicated, the data in the time series shown in Tables 6 to 9 and 
Appendix A2 are daily mean values. 
As seen in Tables 6 to 9, the arithmetic means of daily average water levels inside the 
Refuge range from 16.28 to 15.93 ft NGVD29 for the 17 hydraulic structures, and for the 
POR. Similarly, the maximum and minimum daily average stages are 18.98 and 11.54 ft 
NGVD29, respectively. It is observed that for the POR the water level for the structures 
along the rim canal, on average, is lower than that of the interior stations. However, the 
maximum daily average stage reported for the structures (i.e., 18.98 ft) is higher than the 
maximum value reported for the interior stations (i.e., 18.12 ft). This information shows 
that, on average, the water level in the channel is lower than the water level of the marsh. 
However, under certain conditions the water may overflow the rim canal and moves as 
sheet flow toward the interior of the Refuge. According to Waldon (2005) at high stages 
there is typically little difference between stage in the marsh and at non-operating 
structures and pumps. When outflow gates are opened, stages at the structure headwaters 
fall below the stage representative of the broader region of the canal in the vicinity of the 
structure. At lowest canal stage, water surface elevation falls below interior marsh soil 
elevation and monitored marsh stages. 
Note in Tables 4 to 9 and for the rest of this document, the term “extreme event” has been 
used arbitrarily to indicate a period of time when a particular parameter, e.g., water level, 
shows an unusual high or low value when compared to other high/low values and/or to 
the arithmetic or geometric mean of the data. The classification of a period of time as an 
“extreme event” is partially subjective, and has no other purpose than to illustrate such 
particularity of the data. 

Table 6. Summary of Head/Tail Water Level Data Available at Northern Hydraulic Structures 
Type Available Data Time Series Time Series to Data Information (ft, NGVD 29) 
Gage Location Start End Available be used Average Maximum Minimum Observations/Modifications to data 
The files 318 and TA382 are identical. The times series presented in files 
6676 and TA382 are similar (the average difference is 0.05 ft and the 
maximum difference is 0.31 ft). TA382 is the MOD1 file. The MOD1 file was 
used as input file for the South Florida Water Management Model (SFWMM). 
S-5A 
Pump 
HW 
Outside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 
318, 6676, 
TA382 TA382 + 6676 10.32 12.27 7.74 
The minimum stage equal to 11.91 ft corresponds to an "extreme event" on 
May 2001 
Station The files 320 and TA384 are identical. The times series presented in files 
6677 and 320 are similar (the average difference is 0.04 ft and the maximum 
difference is 0.32 ft). TA384 is the MOD1 file 
*The tendency of the data changed after September 1999. The average, 
TW 320, 6677, maximum and minimum tail water stages until September 1999 are 16.20, 
Inside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 TA384 320 15.47* 18.83* 10.43* 18.76 and 13.91 ft NGVD 29, respectively 
The files 323 and PN454 are very similar, but the files 323 and 6692 have 
HW 323, 6692, major differences (the average difference is 0.07 ft and the maximum 
S-5AS Outside 1/1/1995 9/30/2004 PN454 323 13.91 19.33 9.48 difference is 1.49 ft). This gage is outside of the Refuge 
Spillway Only one file available 
*The tendency of the data changed after September 1999. The average, 
TW maximum and minimum tail water stages until September 1999 are 16.18, 
Inside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 6693 6693 15.48* 18.98* 10.50* 18.98 and 13.84 ft NGVD 29, respectively 
Only one file available 
HW This structure started operating on August 26, 1999, hence there are 67 days 
G-300 Outside 11/2/1999 12/31/2004 KN627 KN627 14.83 18.39 10.54 of missing data 
Spillway Only one file available 
This structure started operating on August 26, 1999, hence there are 67 days 
TW of missing data. The minimum stage equal to 11.91 ft corresponds to an 
Inside 11/2/1999 12/31/2004 KN628 KN628 16.01 17.94 11.91 "extreme event" on May 2001 
HW 
G-301 Outside 8/26/1999 12/27/2004 KS685 KS685 14.90 18.87 10.58 Only one file available 
Spillway 
Only one file available 
TW The minimum stage equal to 11.95 ft corresponds to an "extreme event" on 
Inside 8/26/1999 12/31/2004 KS686 KS686 16.18 18.58 11.95 May 2001 

Table 7. Summary of Head/Tail Water Level Data Available at Western Hydraulic Structures 
Type Available Data Time Series Time Series to Data Information (ft, NGVD 29) 
Gage Location Start End Available be used Average Maximum Minimum Observations/Modifications to data 
HW 
G-310 Outside 7/7/2000 7/31/2003 M5154 M5154 8.88 9.99 7.22 Only one file available 
Pump 
Station 
The files M5155 and PI326 present similar information, the average stage 
difference among the two files is 0.03 ft and the maximum difference is 0.12 
TW ft. The minimum stage equal to 11.51 ft corresponds to an "extreme event" on 
Inside 7/7/2000 12/31/2004 M5155, PI326 M5155 + PI326 16.08 17.96 11.51 May 2001 
G-251 
Pump 
HW 
Outside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 16218 16218 11.07 13.64 8.83 Only one file available 
Station Only one file available 
TW The average value for station G-251 is 0.20 ft higher than the average value 
Inside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 16219 16219 16.28 18.43 12.06 for station G-310 
The two time series (356 and 6684) present major differences (the average 
HW difference is 0.15 ft and the maximum difference is 2.45 ft); however, since 
S-6 Outside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 356, 6684 6684 10.35 12.50 7.81 this gage is outside of the Refuge it won't affect the modeling effort 
Pump 
Station *The average stage is low compared to surrounding stations; but, the 
tendency of the data changed after May 2001. The average tail water stage 
TW until May 2001 is 16.20 ft NGVD 29. 
Inside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 6685 6685 15.17* 18.15 10.81 Only one file available 
HW 
Inside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 16229, P0854 16229 + P0854 16.23 18.15 12.20 Both time series (16229 and P0854) are very similar 
S-10E 
Culvert The time series only have 1 day in common (06/4/95) and the values for this 
day are different. The file 5556 only has data for two months, and therefore a 
time series was not included in the appendixes. 
TW A value equal to 0.07 ft on May 2, 1999, was converted into missing data. This 
Outside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 16230, 5556 16230 14.32 16.81 12.28 gage is outside of the Refuge. 
HW 
G-338 Outside 3/19/2002 12/31/2004 TA863 TA863 13.58 16.97 10.82 Only one file available 
Culvert 
Only one file available 
TW This structure is part of the S-6 diversion structure. It is located next to the S-6 
Inside 3/19/2002 12/31/2004 TA865 TA865 16.12 17.28 13.58 pump and would allow water to flow into the Refuge from the S-6. 

Table 8. Summary of Head/Tail Water Level Data Available at Southern Hydraulic Structures 
Type Available Data Time Series Time Series to Data Information (ft, NGVD 29) 
Gage Location Start End Available be used Average Maximum Minimum Observations/Modifications to data 
The data in the 7912 file are daily water readings (DWR). The data in the 
USGS-S10D-U are daily mean values. The file 7912 was discarded due to the 
S-10D 
Spillway 
HW 
Inside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 
7912, 
USGS-S10D-U USGS-S10D-U 16.15 17.75 13.35 
short period it covers and the amount of missing data. 
The USGS-S10D-U file ID is USGS262300080220001 
The data in the 7621 file are daily water readings (DWR). The data in the 
TW 7621, USGS-S10D-D are daily mean values. The file 7621 was discarded due to the 
Outside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 USGS-S10D-D USGS-S10D-D 13.35 16.98 11.45 short period it covers and the amount of missing data. 
The data in the 7910 file are DWRs. The data in the files USGS-S10C-U and 
G5070 are daily mean values. The file 7910 was discarded due to the short 
period it covers and the amount of missing data. The data in the files USGS-
S10C-U and G5070 are very similar. The 
S-10C 
Spillway 
HW 
Inside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 
7910, G5070, 
USGS-S10C-U 
USGS-S10C-U 
+ G5070 16.11 17.75 11.88 
USGS-S10C-U file ID is USGS262200080210001 
The minimum stage equal to 11.88 ft corresponds to an "extreme event" on 
May 2001 
The data in the 7911 file are DWRs. The data in the files USGS-S10C-D and 
G5071 are daily mean values. The file 7911 was discarded due to the short 
TW 7911, G5071, USGS-S10C-D period it covers and the amount of missing data. The data in the files USGS-
Outside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 USGS-S10C-D + G5071 13.32 16.90 11.47 S10C-D and G5071 are very similar. 
The data in the 7908 file are DWRs. The data in the USGS-S10A-U are daily 
mean values. The file 7908 was discarded due to the short period it covers 
and the amount of missing data. The USGS-
S10D-U file ID is USGS262100080190001 
S-10A HW 7908, The minimum stage equal to 12.06 ft corresponds to an "extreme event" on 
Spillway Inside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 USGS-S10A-U USGS-S10A-U 16.08 17.73 12.06 May 2001 
The data in the 7909 file are DWRs. The data in the USGS-S10A-D are daily 
TW 7909, mean values. The file 7909 was discarded due to the short period it covers 
Outside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 USGS-S10A-D USGS-S10A-D 13.31 16.74 11.44 and the amount of missing data. 
Only one file available 
S-39 
Spillway 
HW 
Inside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 6660 6660 15.93 17.99 11.54 
The minimum stage equal to 11.54 ft corresponds to an "extreme event" on 
May 2001 
TW 
Outside 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 4362, 6661 6661 7.99 11.50 5.07 This gage is outside of the Refuge 

Table 9. Summary of Head/Tail Water Level Data Available at Eastern Hydraulic Structures 
Type Available Data Time Series Time Series to Data Information (ft, NGVD 29) 
Gage Location Start End Available be used Average Maximum Minimum Observations/Modifications to data 
Only one file available 
S-362 
Pump 
Station 
HW 
Outside 10/14/2004 12/31/2004 T0891 T0891 13.50 14.29 12.88 
This time series was not included in the appendices (Due to the short period it 
covers) 
Only one file available 
TW This time series was not included in the appendices (Due to the short period it 
Inside 10/14/2004 12/31/2004 T0893 T0893 16.39 16.71 16.31 covers). This pump discharges from the STA-1E into the Refuge 
HW Only one file available 
ACME # 1 Outside 9/9/1999 12/31/2004 JO090 JO090 12.82 14.41 10.08 A value reported as 0 ft on 9/5/04 was converted to missing data 
Pump 
Station Only one file available 
Stage is measured in a small basin hydraulically connected to the L-40 Canal. 
TW When the pump is not discharging the stage should be representative of the 
Inside 9/9/1999 12/31/2004 JO091 JO091 16.24 18.98 12.01 L-40 stage (Waldon, 2005) 
HW 
ACME # 2 Outside 9/8/1999 12/31/2004 JO092 JO092 12.87 15.56 9.37 Only one file available 
Pump 
Station 
Only one file available 
Stage is measured in a small basin hydraulically connected to the L-40 Canal. 
TW When the pump is not discharging the stage should be representative of the 
Inside 9/8/1999 12/31/2004 JO093 JO093 16.16 18.93 11.98 L-40 stage (Waldon, 2005) 
HW 
G-94C Inside 6/3/2002 12/31/2004 OR352 OR352 16.18 17.36 13.43 Only one file available 
Culvert 
TW MG648 + The two time series (MG648 and OR351) present major differences; however, 
Outside 1/18/2000 12/31/2004 MG648, OR351 OR351 15.69 16.75 13.10 since this gage is outside of the Refuge it may not affect the modeling effort 
HW 
G-94B Inside Not gauged. No file is available from the DBHYDRO website 
Culvert The maximum stage equal to 15.78 ft corresponds to an "extreme event" 
TW during March 15 to 18, 2002,. besides this event, the maximum stage is equal 
Outside 1/18/2000 12/31/2004 NI745 NI745 12.23 15.78 9.53 to 13.86 ft 
HW 
G-94A Inside Not gauged. No file is available from the DBHYDRO website 
Culvert 
TW 
Outside 1/18/2000 12/31/2004 NI744 NI744 12.37 13.82 9.99 Only one file available 

7. Procurement and Quality Assurance of Flow Data 
The nineteen hydraulic structures associated with the water management of the Refuge 
are shown in Figure 10. In the previous section, these structures were classified according 
to their geographical location. They can also be classified according to the direction of 
the flow as: a) inflow structures: S-5A, G-310, G-251, S-6, S-362, ACME -1 and ACME 
-2 (ACME-2 is also referred as G-94D); b) outflow structures: S-10E, S-10D, S-10C, S10A, 
S-39, G-94A, and G-94B; and c) bidirectional flow structures: S-5AS, G-301, G300, 
G-338 and G-94C. 
Discharge Data are available for the 19 structures from the DBHYDRO website 
(additional data for the S-362 station was obtained from SFWMD’s personal). However, 
the data for some of the stations do not cover the complete period of record, namely from 
January 1995 to December 2004 (see Table 10). A more detailed description of the flow 
missing data is presented in Appendix G.3. 
Table 10. Available Flow Data 
Missing Data Days 
Available Data 
Available Data 
from Available Period
Station 
1995 
1996 
1997 
1998 
1999 
2000 
2001 
2002 
2003 
2004 
Start Date 
End Date 
Total 
Continuous 
S-5A 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
S-5AS 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
G-300 
11/2/1999 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
G-301 
8/26/1999 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
G-310 
7/7/2000 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
G-251 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
S-6 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
S-10E 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
G-338 
3/19/2002 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
S-10D 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
S-10C 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
S-10A 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
S-39 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
S-362 
9/21/2004 
12/31/2004 
15 
7 
ACME#1 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
G-94D 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
G-94C 
4/15/2000 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
G-94B 
4/15/2000 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
G-94A 
4/15/2000 
12/31/2004 
0 
0 
Flow data are available for this period 
Structure was in operation but data are not available 
Structure was not in operation during this period 
Table 10 shows that there are data available for the complete POR for stations S-5A, S5AS, 
and S-6. However, these stations were diverted away from the Refuge at some 
points during this period. The S-5A pump station discharged into the Refuge until August 
1999, when it was diverted to the western stormwater treatment area (STA-1W). 
Similarly, structure S-5AS and the S-6 pump were diverted away from the Refuge in June 
1999 and May 2001, respectively. The diversion of the S-6 pump represented a major 
removal of water and phosphorus loading from the Refuge (Waldon 2005). On the other 

hand, structures G-301 and G-300 started operating in August 1999. These structures are 
bidirectional and allow occasional discharge of water from the West Palm Beach Canal 
directly into the Refuge, and also release of water at the north end of the Refuge to the C51 
Canal. The water from the West Palm Beach Canal is normally discharge to STA-1W, 
and the effluent water from STA-1W is later discharged into the Refuge, approximately 
10.6 Km south of G-301 structure, through the large pumping station G-310 (3,040 cfs 
capacity), and a much smaller pumping station G-251 (Waldon 2005). Structure G-310 
started operating in May 1999. On the other hand, structures G-94A, G-94B and G-94C 
have been in operation during the complete POR. According to Waldon (2005) these 
structures are primarily for agricultural and urban water supply; they intermittently 
discharge relatively small volumes out of the Refuge during the dry season. The time 
series available from the DBHYDRO website for these stations are missing 
approximately 63 months of discharge data for each of the sites. 
For the selected POR (1995 to 2004), The DBHYDRO database presents between 2 and 6 
different time series available for each hydraulic structure, with the only exception of 
stations G-338 and S-362 that have only one time series available. As mentioned earlier, 
the DBHYDRO browser user documentation manual recommends the utilization of the 
data identified with the “PREF” recorder, since these time series already underwent a 
second level of QA/QC by SFWMD personnel. However, since not all the stations 
include a “PREF” file or the “PREF” file does not always cover the complete period of 
interest, all the time series available were retrieved from the DBHYDRO website and 
analyzed. Appendix B shows the discharge time series available for the hydraulic 
structures, as well as the comparisons among them (see Figures B.1 to B.84). 
Each of the available time series was reviewed, looking for outliers and discrepancies in 
the data. Tables 11 to 14 indicate the time series available for each site, summarize the 
major observations to the data, and indicate the time series that are recommended for 
future use during the Refuge modeling effort. The arithmetic mean of daily average, and 
the maximum and minimum daily average discharges were calculated for each structure, 
and are also reported in Tables 11 to 14. These tables also report the major periods of 
consecutive operational days, i.e., days of non-zero flow (this is referred as “flowing 
period”) and the major periods of zero-flow (this is referred as “non-flowing period”), 
and the modifications to the selected time series after the completion of the quality 
assurance checks. 
Based on the POR and according to the management structures’ operation, pumping 
stations G-310, S-6 and S-5A present the highest arithmetic mean of daily average 
inflows, with a flow close to 400 cfs. The maximum recorded daily average discharge is 
equal to 4,779 cfs through pumping station S-5A. Meanwhile, stations G-310 and S-6 
show maximum daily average discharges equal to 3,224 and 2,920 cfs, respectively. 
Structures S-39 and S-10D present the highest arithmetic mean of daily average outflows 
to the Refuge with a flow close to 180 cfs. Structures S-10C and S-10A have an 
arithmetic mean of daily average discharge (outflow) close to 145 cfs. The maximum 
recorded daily average outflow from the Refuge is 4,921 cfs through spillway S-10A. 

Table 11. Summary of Flow Data Available at Northern Hydraulic Structures 
Structure/Type/ 
Available Data 
Time Series 
Time Series to 
Data Information (cfs)
Flow
Start 
End 
Available 
be used 
Average 
Maximum 
Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to data 
The three files (6739, TA383 and JW226) are very similar. 6739 was selected because 
it covers the complete period. The flow is intermittent and unidirectional. During the 
S-5A 
studied period, the structure is "flowing" during 49.7% of the days with the maximum 
Pump Station 
flowing period equal to 67 days, from 07/29/02 to 10/3/02. On the other hand, the 
in 
structure is "not-flowing" 50.3% of the days with the maximum non-flowing period 
equal to 62 days (12/22/00 to 02/21/01). The S-5A pump station discharge was 
6739, TA383, 
diverted away of the Refuge on August 26, 1999. The average, maximum and 
1/1/1995 
JW226 
6739
12/31/2004 
471.0 
4837.0 
0.0 
minimum daily discharge until August 26, 1999 are 391.8, 4779 and 0 cfs; respectively. 
No time series covers the complete period. The files 6758, 12899 and 6757 cover from 
1/1/95 to 4/30/00. The files TA410 and L7444 cover from 6/1/99 to 12/31/04, and 
T0951 covers from 1/1/95 to 9/30/04. TA410 is the PREF file and it matches perfectly
S-5AS 
with L7444, but not with T0951. 6757 has lot of missing data. 12899 and 6758 have
Spillway 
major differences, but since 6758 matches better with TA410, for the overlapping
in - out 
period, it will be selected along with TA410. 
6758, 6757, 
The flow is intermittent and bidirectional (positive flow is in). For the studied period, the 
12899, 
structure is "flowing" 42.1% of the time, drawing water out of the Refuge 86.7% of this 
T0951,TA410, 
time. This structure was diverted away from the Refuge on 6/07/99. Until this day 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
L7444 
6758 + TA410 
-79.5 
1495.0 
-1019.0 
the average, max and min daily discharge are -112.8, 1495 and -966 cfs; respectively. 
The files KD315 and TA411 are identical. TA411 is the PREF file. The flow is 
intermittent and bidirectional (positive flow is in). The structure is "flowing" 30.6% of the
G-300 
time, with 60.5% of negative flow. The maximum flowing period is 104 days (11/9/00 to
Spillway 
2/22/01), and the maximum non-flowing period is 264 days (10/13/03 to 7/3/04). This
in - out 
structure started operating on August 26, 1999; but, the first flow is reported on 
11/2/1999 
KD315, TA411 
TA411
12/31/2004 
2.4 
2494.0 
-1302.0 
November 2, 1999. 
The two files (JJ809 and TA412) present major differences. TA412 is the PREF file, 
but only covers the period from 11/2/99 to 12/31/04. The JJ809 file starts at 08/26/99, 
and will be used for filling the gap between this date and 11/2/99. 
G-301 
The flow is intermittent and bidirectional. The structure is "flowing" only 18.9% of the 
Spillway 
time, with negative flow 50.1% of the time. The maximum flowing period is 30 days 
in -out 
(10/5/99 to 11/5/99), and the maximum non-flowing period is 148 days (9/14/01 to 
02/09/02). This structure started operating on late August 1999. According to Waldon 
(2005) calibration of flow rating is complicated at this gage by interaction with the G-
8/26/1999 
JJ809, TA412 
TA412+JJ809
12/27/2004 
28.4 
2758.0 
-1158.0 
302 gate (inflow to STA-1W) 

Table 12. Summary of Flow Data Available at Western Hydraulic Structures 
Structure/Type/ 
Available Data 
Time Series 
Time Series to 
Data Information (cfs)
Flow
Start 
End 
Available 
be used 
Average 
Maximum 
Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to data 
The files LQ977 and M2901 are very similar, while the file PK919 presents major
G-310 
differences with respect to these two files. M2901 is the PREF file and will be used for
Pump Station 
forcing the model. The flow is intermittent and unidirectional. The maximum flowing
in 
period is 93 days (7/17/04 to 10/17/04) and the maximum non-flowing period is 64 
LQ977, M2901, 
days (1/26/01 to 3/31/01) 
6/8/2000
PK919 
M2901
12/31/2004 
411.0 
3224.0 
0.0 
This structure started operating on July 7, 2000. 
G-251 
The three time series available are identical (15848, JW222 and P1047). The file 
Pump Station 
15848 will be used because it covers the complete period (1/1/95 to 12/31/04). The 
in 
flow is intermittent, but the flowing periods are dominant. The maximum flowing period 
15848, JW222, 
is 329 days (7/12/97 to 6/5/98) and the maximum non-flowing period is 164 days 
1/1/1995 
P1047 
15848
12/31/2004 
118.6 
430.0 
0.0 
(10/17/00 to 3/30/01) 
The time series 15034 and P1019 are identical. The time series 6741 is similar to 
these two with minor differences, and the 357 file presents major differences with 
S-6 
respect to the other files. The file 15034 covers the complete period and is the PREF 
Pump Station 
file. The flow is intermittent and unidirectional. The maximum flowing period is 88 days 
in 
(8/13/99 to 11/8/99) and the maximum non-flowing period is 144 days (10/17/00 to 
3/9/01). The S-6 pump station discharge was diverted away from the Refuge on May 
6741, 15034, 
2001. The average, maximum and minimum daily discharge until May 2001 are 398.6, 
1/1/1995 
P1019, 357 
15034
12/31/2004 
385.7 
2920.0 
0.0 
2920 and 0 cfs; respectively. 
S-10E 
The files K5484 and P1066 are very similar, but the file 16228 presents major 
Culvert 
differences. K5484 is the PREF file and covers the complete period. The flow is 
out 
intermittent and unidirectional. This structure draws water out of the Refuge. The 
16228, K5484, 
maximum flowing period is 150 days, from 2/5/96 to 7/3/96. The structure shows 
1/1/1995 
P1066 
K5484
12/31/2004 
33.4 
554.0 
0.0 
virtually no flow after August 7, 1997. 
Only one file available 
G-338 
This structure is part of the S-6 diversion structure. It is located next to the S-6 pump 
Culvert 
and would allow water to flow into the Refuge from the S-6. This structure has not 
in - out 
been used during the POR; however, the gates may have been opened for 
maintenance at times. Positive flows are into the Refuge. The time series MC705 was 
3/19/2002 
MC705 
MC705
12/31/2004 
0.0 
1.0 
-17.7 
not included in the Appendices (the flow for this structures is negligible). 

Table 13. Summary of Flow Data Available at Southern Hydraulic Structures 
Structure/Type/ 
Available Data 
Time Series 
Time Series to 
Data Information (cfs)
Flow
Start 
End 
Available 
be used 
Average 
Maximum 
Minimum 
The file 3790 is empty. The files 15263 and TA421 are very similar, but TA421 is the 
S-10D 
PREF file. The flow is intermittent and unidirectional. Non-flowing periods are dominant 
Spillway 
over flowing periods. The maximum non-flowing period is 329 days (9/18/03 to 
out 
8/12/04), while the maximum flowing period is "only" 37 days (9/7/04 to 10/13/04). 
This structure draws water out of the Refuge (positive flow is out). The time series 
3790, 15263, 
15263 presents a Q= -1622 cfs on 5/2/2004, however the S-10D gates were closed at 
1/1/1995 
TA421 
TA421
12/31/2004 
175.9 
2724.0 
0.0 
this date (Sylvester et al., 2005) and this negative value was discarded. 
The file 3796 is empty. The files 15262 and TA420 are very similar, but TA420 is the 
S-10C 
PREF file. The flow is intermittent and unidirectional. Non-flowing periods are 
Spillway 
dominant over flowing periods. The maximum non-flowing period is 435 days (6/4/03 
out 
to 8/12/04), while the maximum flowing period is "only" 44 days (9/2/04 to 10/15/04). 
This structure draws water out of the Refuge (positive flow is out). The time series 
3796, 15262, 
15262 presents a Q= -726 cfs on 5/2/2004, however the S-10D gates were closed at 
1/1/1995 
TA420 
TA420
12/31/2004 
146.3 
3276.0 
0.0 
this date (Sylvester et al., 2005) and this negative value was discarded. 
The file 3784 is empty. The files 15261 and TA419 are very similar, but TA419 is the 
PREF file. The flow is intermittent and unidirectional. Non-flowing periods are dominant 
over flowing periods. The maximum non-flowing period is 456 days (6/4/03 to 9/1/04),
S-10A 
Spillway 
while the maximum flowing period is "only" 42 days (9/2/04 to 10/13/04). 
out
This structure draws water out of the Refuge (positive flow is out). The time series 
15261 presents two negative values, Q= -1337 cfs on 5/2/04 and Q=-58 on 12/14/01, 
however the S-10D gates were closed at these dates (Sylvester et al., 2005) and these 
3784, 15261, 
negative values were discarded. The data present an "extreme event" of high flow 
1/1/1995 
TA419 
TA419
12/31/2004 
141.4 
4921.0 
0.0 
from October 15 to October19, 1999 
The files K5489, 6733 and P1012 are very similar. K5489 was selected because it is 
Spillway 
the PREF file. The flow is intermittent and unidirectional. For the studied period 57% of 
out 
the days are "flowing" and 43% are "not-flowing". The maximum flowing period is 140 
6733, K5489, 
days (11/10/98 to 3/29/99) and the maximum non-flowing period is 169 days (5/12/97 
1/1/1995 
P1012 
K5489
12/31/2004 
184.7 
888.0 
0.0 
to 10/27/97). This structure draws water out of the Refuge 

Table 14. Summary of Flow Data Available at Eastern Hydraulic Structures 
Structure/Type/Fl 
Available Data 
Time Series 
Time Series to 
Data Information (cfs)
ow
Start 
End 
Available 
be used 
Average 
Maximum 
Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to data 
The file SFWMD-S362 covers the period form 9/21/04 to 10/6/04. This files was 
provided by SFWMD's personal. The file T0897 was obtained from DBHYDRO and
Pump Station 
covers the period from 10/14/04 to 12/31/04. Since both time series cover short 
in 
periods and these periods don't overlap, the time series were combined into one (see 
T0897, 
T0897 + 
Appendices). The S362 pump discharges from STA-1E. It discharged during the 2004 
9/21/2004 
SFWMD-S362 
SFWMD-S362
12/31/2004 
98.2 
2044.5 
0.0 
hurricane season on an emergency basis. 
The files OH647, PI317 and JO088 are similar. The file 15022 presents major 
ACME # 1 
differences with respect to the other files. OH647 is the PREF file and covers the 
Pump Station 
complete period. 
in
The flow is intermittent and unidirectional. During the studied period 23.9% of the days 
were "flowing" and 76.1% were "not-flowing". The maximum flowing period is 19 days 
15022, OH647, 
(9/20/04 to 10/8/04), and the maximum non-flowing period is 100 days (12/14/02 to 
1/1/1995 
PI317, JO088 
OH647
12/31/2004 
21.4 
358.6 
0.0 
3/23/02) 
The files OH648, PI318 and JO089 are similar. The file 15023 presents major 
ACME # 2 
differences with respect to the other files. OH648 is the PREF file and covers the 
Pump Station 
complete period. 
in
The flow is intermittent and unidirectional. During the studied period 25.3% of the days 
were "flowing" and 74.7% were "not-flowing". The maximum flowing period is 19 days 
15023, OH648, 
(9/20/04 to 10/8/04), and the maximum non-flowing period is 100 days (12/14/02 to 
1/1/1995 
PI318, JO089 
OH648
12/31/2004 
19.8 
401.0 
0.0 
3/23/02) 

Cont. Table 14. Summary of Flow Data Available at Eastern Hydraulic Structures 
Structure/Type/Fl 
Available Data 
Time Series 
Time Series to 
Data Information (cfs)
ow
Start 
End 
Available 
be used 
Average 
Maximum 
Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to data 
The information for this structure is incomplete. This structure was already operational 
on 1/1/1995, and therefore the files are missing about 57 months of flow data. The files 
G-94C 
TA424 and OR446 are very similar, but TA424 is the PREF file. The files TA424 and 
Culvert 
OR446 only overlap for 119 days, presenting major differences during this period. The 
in-out 
PREF time series (TA424) only has data after 6/4/02. 
The flow is intermittent and bidirectional, with outflows being positives. During the 
MW385, 
MW385 + 
1715 days of available data, 1202 days (70.1%) are "not-flowing" days, 502 days 
4/15/2000 
OR446, TA424 
TA424
12/31/2004 
38.6 
400.1 
-257.3 
(29.3%) are outflow days, and only 11 days are inflow days (0.6%). 
The information for this structure is incomplete. This structure was already operational
G-94B 
on 1/1/1995, and therefore the files are missing about 57 months of flow data. The files
Culvert 
TA423 and SX615 are very similar, but TA423 is the PREF file. The files NI750 and
out 
TA423 only overlap for 220 days, presenting minor differences during this period. The 
PREF time series (TA423) only has data after 6/3/02. 
NI750, SX615, 
The flow is intermittent and unidirectional (outflow). During the 1703 days of available 
4/15/2000 
TA423 
NI750 + TA423
12/31/2004 
4.7 
268.9 
0.0 
data, 1644 days (96.5%) are "not-flowing" days, and only 59 days are "flowing" (3.5%) 
The information for this structure is incomplete. This structure was already operational
G-94A 
on 1/1/1995, and therefore the files are missing about 57 months of flow data. The files
Culvert 
TA422 and SX614 are very similar, but TA422 is the PREF file. The files NI751 and 
out 
TA422 only overlap for 219 days, presenting minor differences during this period. The 
files TA422 only has data after 6/4/02. 
NI751, SX614, 
The flow is intermittent and unidirectional (outflow). During the 1703 days of available 
4/15/2000 
TA422 
NI751 + TA422
12/31/2004 
20.3 
227.5 
0.0 
data, 1311 days (77%) are "not-flowing" days, and 392 days are "flowing" (23.0%) 

Table 15 shows the total cumulative inflows and outflows from water management 
structures into and out of the Loxahatchee Refuge. For the POR, the yearly average 
inflow to the Refuge is 579,038 acre-ft and the yearly average outflow is 576,141 acre-ft. 
For this long-term cumulative the total outflow is only 0.5% lower than the total inflow. 
The close balance between inflows and outflows through the water control structures, and 
the fact that the annual average rainfall and potential evapotranspiration (ETp) are similar 
(Abtew et al. 2005), indicates that water losses through seepage may not be significant in 
the long-term average scenario. The average annual rainfall in the entire region managed 
by the SFWMD is 52.8 inches, while the average ETp is reported to be 52.6 inches 
(Waldon 2005). 
Table 15. Cumulative Inflows and Outflows to the Loxahatchee Refuge for the Period 
that Goes from January 1995 to December 2004. Flow Through Water Control 
Structures. 
Total 
Operational Dates Operative Daily Net Inflow Net outflow 
Days during Average Volume Volume 
Structure Type of Flow Type of Flow Start End the POR Flow (cfs) (Ac-ft) (Ac-ft) 
S-5A Pump Station Inflow 1/1/1995 8/26/1999 1698 391.8 1,319,556 0 
S-5AS Spillway Bidirectional 1/1/1995 6/7/1999 1618 112.8 0 362,004 
G-300 Spillway Bidirectional 8/26/1999 12/31/2004 1954 2.4 9,302 0 
G-301 Spillway Bidirectional 8/26/1999 12/27/2004 1950 28.4 109,845 0 
G-310 Pump Station Inflow 7/7/2000 12/31/2004 1638 411.0 1,335,308 0 
G-251 Pump Station Inflow 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 3652 118.6 859,095 0 
S-6 Pump Station Inflow 1/1/1995 5/15/2001 2326 398.6 1,838,963 0 
S-10E Culvert Outflow 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 3652 33.4 0 241,937 
G-338 Culvert Inflow 1/1/1995 5/15/2001 2326 0.0 0 0 
S-10D Spillway Outflow 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 3652 175.9 0 1,274,156 
S-10C Spillway Outflow 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 3652 146.3 0 1,059,744 
S-10A Spillway Outflow 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 3652 141.4 0 1,024,250 
S-39 Spillway Outflow 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 3652 184.7 0 1,337,900 
S-362 Pump Station Inflow 9/21/2004 12/31/2004 101 99.2 19,873 0 
ACME # 1 Pump Station Inflow 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 3652 21.4 155,014 0 
ACME # 2 Pump Station Inflow 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 3652 19.8 143,424 0 
G-94C Culvert Bidirectional 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 3652 38.7* 0 280,329 
G-94B Culvert Outflow 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 3652 4.7* 0 34,045 
G-94A Culvert Outflow 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 3652 20.3* 0 147,046 
Total 5,790,380 5,761,411 
* This value was extrapolated by the authors to the period that covers the structure 
operational dates (1/1/95 to 12/31/04), from the period of available data (4/15/00 to 
12/31/04) 

8. Procurement and Quality Assurance of Meteorological Data 
8.1 Rainfall Data
Daily rainfall data are available at different locations inside and close to the Loxahatchee 
Refuge. There are five stations inside the Refuge: 5A, S-6, S-39, WCA1ME, LOXWS 
and one station located at the Everglades Nutrients Removal Project (ENRP) site, which 
is located adjacent to the northwestern boundary of the Refuge. These six rainfall 
measurements stations are operated by the SFWMD and Data are available from the 
DBHYDRO website. There are also ten additional rain gages located adjacent to the 
Refuge. Data for these stations were provided by USFWS’s personnel. The location of 
the rainfall measurements stations is shown in Figure 11. Stations S-5A, S-6, and S-39 
have daily average rainfall measurements since 1956, 1960 and 1963, respectively. The 
weather station WCA1ME has rainfall measurements since 1994, and weather stations 
LOXWS and ENRP have measurements since 1996. The aforementioned ten additional 
rain gages are located adjacent to the Refuge in Basin A and Basin B. Location of rain 
gages in Basin B (Gage 6 through Gage 10) is shown in Figure 11. Daily rainfall 
measurements from these gages are available since January 1997. Gage10 (PS-2) was 
added to this rain gage network in April 2000, and its daily rainfall Data are available 
since then. 
Historical rainfall measurements at USGS water level monitoring sites 1-7, 1-8C, and 1-9 
are also available at the DBHYDRO website. However, these rain gages are not currently 
in operation. Daily average rainfall data from these gages are available only for the 
period of 1960 to 1984. 
Availability of rainfall data for the POR (1995-2004) is shown in Table 16. This table 
also includes the information about missing data along with start and end dates of 
available periods. A more detailed description of the rainfall missing data is presented in 
Appendix G.4. 
Daily rainfall measurements from all these rain gages are plotted and presented in 
Appendix C. There are more than one time series of rainfall data available from stations 
S-39, S-5A, and S-6. Rainfall stations S-5A and S-6 have “PREF” time series files that 
will be used to estimate rain at those stations. Rainfall station S-39 has three time series 
files (6035, 16677, and K8674) that do not have a good agreement with each other. Time 
series 6035 and K8674 have better match with each other than with the time series file 
16677. Thus, the time series files 6035 and K8674 will be used to estimate rainfall at S39 
station. Plots showing comparison of rainfall records for different time series are also 
presented in Appendix C. 

Figure 11. Location of Rain Gages and Weather Stations 
Table 16. Available Rainfall Data 
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Start Date End Date Total Continuous 
S-5A 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 0 0 
S-6 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 0 0 
S-39 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 32 7 
STA1W 1/1/1995 9/30/2004 0 0 
WCA1ME 2/12/1996 12/31/2004 640 359 
LOXWS 12/31/1995 12/31/2004 216 85 
Gage 1 1/1/1997 12/31/2004 0 0 
Gage 2 1/1/1997 12/31/2004 0 0 
Gage 3 1/1/1997 12/31/2004 0 0 
Gage 4 1/1/1997 12/31/2004 0 0 
Gage 5 1/1/1997 12/31/2004 0 0 
Gage 6 1/1/1997 12/31/2004 0 0 
Gage 7 1/1/1997 12/31/2004 0 0 
Gage 8 1/1/1997 12/31/2004 0 0 
Gage 9 1/1/1997 12/31/2004 0 0 
Gage 10 4/1/2000 12/31/2004 0 0 
Missing Data Days from 
Available PeriodStation 
Available Data Available Data 
Summary of rainfall measurements from all the rain gages is shown in Table 17. This 
table indicates that the average annual rainfall records from new gages (Gage 1 to Gage 9 
in the table) are higher than the average annual rainfall from SFWMD’s rain gages. Years 
with more than 30 days of missing data were not included in the calculation of the annual 
average rainfall. For years with less than 30 days missing, the total sum of rainfall was 
compared with nearby gages with complete data. If the total cumulative rainfall for the 
year with missing data was smaller than the nearby gages, then a decision was made to 
discard such a year from the calculation of the annual average of rainfall. An exception 

was made with the 1999 data for the LOXWS gage. For this year the gage has 48 days 
missing, but the total rainfall sum was higher than nearby gages and also the highest 
individual year value for the gage, and therefore it was included in the calculation 
without filling any missing day. In summary, annual average rainfall recorded from these 
new gages from the year 1997 to 2004 is 64.56 inches, whereas, average rainfall recorded 
from SFWMD’s rain gages for the same period is 49.18 inches. The difference in annual 
rainfall measurements from these two different sources is about 15 inches, which is 
considerable. Such a large discrepancy must be addressed before the modeling efforts 
commence. Effort is underway to obtain RADAR rainfall estimates from the SFWMD. 
These estimates will be compared to the point gauge estimates and possibly used in the 
modeling effort. More discussion on this issue will be provided in subsequent reports. 
In terms of seasonality, more rainfall seems to be occurring during the months June-
October compared to the rest of the year. Maximum daily rainfall over the refuge was 
recorded on October 15, 1999. On that day, most rain gages recorded about 8 inches of 
rainfall, whereas stations S-39 and S-5A recorded less than 2 inches of rain. 
Table 17. Summary of Available Rainfall Data. 
Station 
Available Time 
Series 
Selected Time 
Series 
Maximum 
Daily 
(inch) 
Maximum 
Monthly 
(inch) 
Minimum 
Monthly 
(inch) 
Annual 
Average 
(inch) 
S5A 
5895, 16176, 
15202, 16645, 
K8682 
15202 7.18 17.48 0.00 53.04 
S6 15203, 16202, 
16651, K8685 
15203 6.36 16.78 0.01 48.74 
S39 6035, 16677, 
K8674 
6035+K8674 6.66 15.24 0.00 49.77 
LOXWS DU551 DU551 9.46 22.68 0.01 49.55 
WCA1ME DU517 DU517 8.35 18.33 0.00 51.28 
STA1W KN809, J5744 KN809+J5744 6.88 17.88 0.03 47.76 
Gage1 Shop (Basin A) 8.60 24.89 0.25 65.74 
Gage2 Water Plant (Basin A) 10.68 23.59 0.14 65.50 
Gage3 PS-3 (Basin A) 8.80 18.80 0.02 63.78 
Gage4 PS-4 (Basin A) 8.30 20.90 0.05 61.45 
Gage5 PS-5 Lift Sta. (Basin A) 8.30 21.10 0.13 66.82 
Gage6 Sth. Shore Sth. End (Basin B) 8.40 19.11 0.00 66.11 
Gage7 Wells @ Homeland (Basin B) 8.52 22.81 0.00 64.73 
Gage8 PS-1 (Basin B)8.20 16.22 0.05 61.12 
Gage9 Sewer Plant (Basin B) 9.88 22.86 0.15 65.86 
Gage10 PS-2 (Basin B) 5.55 16.51 0.00 59.31 

8.2 Evaporation and Potential Evapotranspiration Data
Evapotranspiration (ET) data for the Refuge are available from the ENRP (STA-1W) site. 
Also, pan evaporation and potential evapotranspiration are available from stations S-5A 
and LOXWS, respectively. The location of these stations is shown in Figure 11, and the 
availability of data is summarized in Table 18. A more detailed description of the 
evaporation and ET missing data is presented in Appendix G.5. Time series of 
evaporation and ET measurements are included in Appendix D. A comparison between 
ET measurements from STA-1W and potential ET from weather station LOXWS is also 
included in this Appendix. This comparison shows that, in general, potential ET 
estimated from LOXWS is less than ET measurements from STA-1W. 
Figure 12 shows the ET’s seasonal variation estimated from STA-1W for the POR. As 
can be observed in this figure, ET is higher during the months of March to August (with 
values higher than 4.5 inches), reaching a peak of about 6 inches in May. A regional 
evaluation of ET in the everglades conducted by German (2000) presented similar results 
to those shown in Figure 12. Annually, the average ET from the STA-1W station for the 
POR is equal to 52 inches, which is almost equal to the annual average rainfall from 
SFWMD’s rain gages. 
Table 18. Available Evaporation and Evapotranspiration Data 
Missing Data Days from 
Station 
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Start Date End Date 
Available Data Available Data 
Total Continuous 
Available Period 
Pan Evaporation 
S5A 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 1107 30 
Evapotranspiration 
STA1W 
1/1/1995 
12/31/2004 
0 
Potential Evapotranspiration 
LOXWS 
1/1/1995 
10/31/2004 
807 
106 

0 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
Monthly Evapotranspiration (inch) 
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 
Figure 12. Seasonal Variation of ET Estimated at STA1W 
8.3 Air Temperature Data
Air temperature data for the Refuge are available from weather station LOXWS (see 
Figure 11). The available data covers the complete POR; however, there are 320 days of 
missing data from which 85 days are continuous. A detailed description of the air 
temperature missing data is presented in Appendix G.6. It should be noted that there were 
five days with temperature equal to 0ºC that were converted to missing data. Figure 13 
shows the temperature time series from station LOXWS including the missing and zero-
temperature days. Excluding the five days with temperature equal to 0ºC, the daily 
temperatures range between 7°C to 30°C, with an annual average of 23.4 °C for the POR. 
Figure 14 shows the seasonal variation of air temperature observed at LOXWS for the 
POR. As can be observed in this figure, air temperature is higher during the months of 
May to October (with values close or higher than 25°C), reaching a peak of about 27.3°C 
in August. For the POR, the monthly average temperature ranges from 17.8°C to 27.3°C. 

0 
5 
10 
15 
20 
25 
30 
35 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Temperature (degrees) 
Air Temperature Measurements from Weather Station L0XWS 
4/15/98 5/20/99 
Figure 13. LOXWS Air Temperature 
Average Monthly Temperature 
0 
5 
10 
15 
20 
25 
30 
Temperature oC 
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 
Figure 14. Average Monthly Temperature from 1995 to 2004 Observed at Weather 
Station LOXWS. 

8.4 Wind Data
Wind speed data for the Refuge are available from weather stations LOXWS and 
ENR308 from the DBHYDRO website. For these sites, wind speed data are available for 
the complete POR, but there is not information about wind direction. The ENR308 site is 
a weather station located at the Everglades Nutrients Removal Project (ENRP), which is 
located adjacent to the northwestern boundary of the Refuge. Station S-5A also has wind 
speed measurements, but it covers only until August 1998, and wind direction data are 
also not available. Wind speed and wind direction data are available at three USGS 
stations located close to the Refuge, but data for two of these stations are only available 
for 1996 and 1997. The other USGS station has data for the period of January 1996 to 
September 1999. There is a fourth USGS station close to the Refuge, but the wind data 
are missing. More information about the USGS stations is presented in German (2000). 
Additional to the data of the aforementioned stations, wind direction along with wind 
speed data were obtained from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). The Local 
Climatological Data for the NCDC are collected at the West Palm Beach International 
Airport (PBI). The location of the wind stations is shown in Figure 15, and Table 19 
summarizes the availability of wind data. 
Table 19. Available Wind Data 
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Start Date End Date Total Continuous 
ENR308 1/1/95 9/25/04 1 1 
LOXWS 1/1/95 12/31/04 253 85 
S-5A 1/1/95 8/31/98 29 29 
PBI 1/1/95 12/31/04 4 1 
USGS-1 1/1/96 12/31/97 17 13 
USGS-2 
USGS-3 1/1/96 12/31/97 58 58 
USGS-4 1/1/96 9/30/99 97 21 
PBI 12/31/95 12/31/04 7 2 
USGS-1 1/1/96 12/31/97 15 13 
USGS-2 
USGS-3 1/1/96 12/31/97 0 0 
USGS-4 1/1/96 9/30/99 97 21 
Wind Direction 
West Palm Beach International Airport (PBI) 
Wind Speed 
Missing Data Days from 
Available PeriodStation 
Available Data Available Data 
A more detailed description of wind missing data is presented in Appendix G.7. 
Plots of the available wind speed and wind direction dara are presented in Appendix E. 
For the POR, the average wind speed for stations ENR308 and LOXWS are 6.97 and 
6.59 mile/hour, respectively. The maximum recorded daily average wind speed for these 
stations are 36.87 and 38.59 mile/hour respectively. The maximum wind speed at 
ENR308 was recorded on September 4, 2004, where the maximum wind speed at 
LOXWS was observed on March 01, 2001. Average S-5A wind speed from 1995 to 1998 

is 4.67 mile/hour, which is lower than wind speed from the other weather stations. The 
average wind speed for the USGS stations 1, 3 and 4 (see Figure 15) are 3.78, 4.67 and 
4.68 mile/hour, respectively. 
Figure 15. Location of Wind Stations 

9. Procurement and Quality Assurance of Water Quality Data 
9.1 Water Quality Data
Water quality data for the Loxahatchee Refuge are available from five different sources: 
1) the Everglades Protection Area (EVPA) water quality monitoring sites, 2) the 
“Enhanced” water quality monitoring sites, 3) the District Transect monitoring sites or 
XYZ data, 4) the water quality monitoring sites located at the hydraulic structures, and 5) 
additional independent monitoring sites. Water quality data for groups 1, 2, 4 and 5 can 
be downloaded from the SFWMD’s DBHYDRO database, and the XYZ data can be 
requested from the SFWMD. 
There are fourteen Everglades Protection Area (EVPA) water quality monitoring sites 
inside the Refuge marsh that were active during the period of study. These water quality 
stations were designed to monitor the physical, chemical and biological quality of the 
Refuge. Table 20 shows some of the water quality parameters that are measured in the 
EVPA stations, and Figure 16 shows the location of these monitoring sites. Most of the 
water quality variables are sampled and reported monthly; however, not all the 
parameters are measured at the same frequency. The sampling frequency of water quality 
monitoring stations is irregular. The current SFWMD monitoring programs are described 
by Germain (1998). According to Weaver and Payne (2004) the sampling frequency in 
the SFWMD monitoring stations varies by site depending on site classification, variable 
group, and hydrologic conditions. More than ten years of water quality data can be 
retrieved from the SFWMD’s DBHYDRO database. It should be noted that water quality 
data at inflow and outflow control structures are typically sampled biweekly when 
flowing and monthly otherwise. 
Table 20. DBHYDRO Variable Names and Description for Water Quality Parameters 
Measured at e EVPA Water Quality Monitoring Site. 
Variable Description Variable Description 
ALKA ALKALINITY, TOT, CACO3 SIO2 SILICA 
APA ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE SO4 SULFATE 
CA CALCIUM TDKN KJELDAHL NITROGEN, DIS 
CL CHLORIDE TDORC CARBON, DISSOLVED ORGANIC 
COLOR COLOR TDPO4 PHOSPHATE, DISSOLVED AS P 
DO DISSOLVED OXYGEN TDS TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS 
HARD HARDNESS AS CACO3 TEMP TEMP 
LCOND SP CONDUCTIVITY, LAB TORGC CARBON, TOTAL ORGANIC 
MG MAGNESIUM TOTAL ALUMINUM, TOTAL 
NH4 AMMONIA-N TOTCD CADMIUM, TOTAL 
NO2 NITRITE-N TOTCU COPPER, TOTAL 
NO3 NITRATE-N TOTHG MERCURY, TOTAL 
OPO4 PHOSPHATE, ORTHO AS P TOTZN ZINC, TOTAL 
PH PH, FIELD TPO4 PHOSPHATE, TOTAL AS P 
SALIN SALINITY TSS TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS 
SCOND SP CONDUCTIVITY, FIELD TURBI TURBIDITY 

It is important to note that care must be taken while interpreting some of the variable 
names and descriptions in DBHYDRO. TPO4 and TDPO4, for example, are respectively 
total phosphorus and total dissolved phosphorus as mg/L of phosphorus (not simply 
phosphate and not as phosphate mass). 
Figure 16. Location of Water Quality Monitoring Sites Inside the Refuge. 
9.2 Total Phosphorus Data – EVPA Stations 
Based on the selected POR, total phosphorus (TP), and chloride (Cl) were retrieved from 
the DBHYDRO database for the 14 EVPA monitoring sites, i.e., stations LOX3 to 
LOX16. Figure 17 shows the location of the EVPA stations. The TP time series for each 
station are included in Appendix F1. For the POR, the sample size (number of data points 
available) varies between 65 and 122, the arithmetic averages of measured TP 
concentrations vary between 7.3 and 11.8 mg/L, and the geometric means between 6.6 

and 10.1 mg/L. The TP mean concentration for all the EVPA sites together is between 9.2 
and 9.0 mg/L (the uncertainty in this estimate is due to several values that were reported 
to be less than the limit-of-detection). Table 21 indicates, for each EVPA site, the 
arithmetic average, the geometric mean, the maximum and the minimum reported value, 
the sample size, and the start and end dates of the available data (all this information is 
according to the selected POR). This table also summarizes the major observations to the 
data and the modifications it underwent after the quality assurance checks. 
Figure 17. Location of the EVPA Water Quality Monitoring Sites 

Table 21. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for the EVPA Stations 
Station 
Available Data Study Period Sample 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Data Information (mg/L) 
Observations/Modifications to DataStart End Start End 
Average* Geometric 
Mean* 
Maximum Minimum 
LOX3 1/11/1995 12/13/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 65 Irregular 11.8 - 11.7 10.1-9.9 50.0 4.0 
Two values were reported to be less than the limit-of-detection (LOD). These 
values were reported equal to -4mg/L on 11/13/95 and 1/10/96. The geometric 
mean of measured P concentrations for this station equals the total phosphorus 
criterion (10 mg/L). This station reports the highest arithmetic average and 
geometric mean of measured P concentrations 
LOX4 1/11/1995 12/13/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 80 Irregular 11.2 9.9-9.8 54.0 4.0 
A value was reported to be less than the LOD. This value was reported equal to -
4mg/L reported on 11/12/96. 
The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station does not 
exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
LOX5 1/11/1995 11/15/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 80 Irregular 10.7-10.6 9.3-9 80.0 5.0 
Four values were reported to be less than the LOD. These values were reported 
equal to -4mg/L on 10/16/95, 6/10/96, 7/8/96 and 11/12/96. The maximum value 
equal to 80 mg/L is particularly high, it corresponds to an "extreme event" that 
occurred on 2/8/95. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this 
station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
LOX6 1/11/1995 12/14/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 112 Irregular 8.1-7.9 7.3-7.0 44.0 4.0 
Eight values were reported to be less than the LOD. These values were reported 
as -4mg/L. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station 
does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
LOX7 1/11/1995 12/13/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 110 Irregular 8.9-8.8 8.4-8.1 19.0 4.0 
Four values were reported to be less than the LOD. These values were reported 
as -4mg/L on 11/13/95, 4/15/96, 3/3/97 and 6/10/97. The geometric mean of 
measured P concentrations for this station does not exceed the total phosphorus 
criterion (10 mg/L) 
LOX8 1/11/1995 12/13/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 113 Irregular 9.1-9.0 8.4-8.1 26.0 4.0 
Six values were reported to be less than the LOD. These values were reported as 
-4mg/L. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station does 
not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
LOX9 1/11/1995 12/13/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 88 Irregular 8.8-8.7 8.1-7.9 25.0 4.0 
Four values were reported to be less than the LOD. These values were reported 
as -4mg/L on 9/18/95, 11/13/95, 6/10/96 and 7/8/96. The geometric mean of 
measured P concentrations for this station does not exceed the total phosphorus 
criterion (10 mg/L) 
For these stations all the samples were collected as grab samples 
*The upper limits of the average and geometric means were calculated replacing the negative values in the time series by the limit-of-detection (LOD), and the 
lower limits were calculated replacing the negative values by half the LOD. A negative value is the convention used by the SFWMD to report values when are 
less than the LOD. The LOD is the absolute value of the number reported. 

Cont. Table 21. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for the EVPA Stations 
Station 
Available Data Study Period Sample 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Data Information (mg/L) 
Observations/Modifications to DataStart End Start End 
Average* Geometric 
Mean* 
Maximum Minimum 
LOX10 1/11/1995 12/13/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 79 Irregular 9.4-9.3 8.7-8.5 23.0 4.0 
Two values were reported to be less than the LOD. These values were reported 
as -4mg/L on 6/10/96 and 3/3/97. The geometric mean of measured P 
concentrations for this station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 
mg/L) 
LOX11 1/12/1995 12/14/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 108 Irregular 9.5 8.9-8.7 22.0 4.0 
Three values were reported to be less than the LOD. These values were reported 
as -4mg/L on 12/122/95, 7/9/96 and 3/4/97. The geometric mean of measured P 
concentrations for this station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 
mg/L) 
LOX12 1/12/1995 12/14/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 122 Irregular 8.6-8.5 7.7-7.5 47.0 4.0 
Four values were reported to be less than the LOD. These values were reported 
as -4mg/L on 10/18/95, 12/12/95, 2/6/96 and 2/4/97. The geometric mean of 
measured P concentrations for this station does not exceed the total phosphorus 
criterion (10 mg/L) 
LOX13 1/12/1995 12/14/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 104 Irregular 9.6-9.5 8.7-8.5 35.0 4.0 
Four values were reported to be less than the LOD. These values were reported 
as -4mg/L on 9/19/95, 12/12/95, 11/12/96 and 3/4/97. The geometric mean of 
measured P concentrations for this station does not exceed the total phosphorus 
criterion (10 mg/L) 
LOX14 1/12/1995 12/14/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 116 Irregular 8.2-8.1 7.6-7.5 20.0 4.0 
Three values were reported to be less than the LOD. These values were reported 
as -4mg/L on 10/16/96, 3/4/97 and 2/4/98; and a value was reported as -2 mg/L on 
11/6/01. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station does 
not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
LOX15 1/12/1995 12/14/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 118 Irregular 7.4-7.3 6.9-6.6 35.0 2.0 
Seven values were reported to be less than the LOD. These values were reported 
as -4mg/L. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station 
does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). This station reports the 
lowest arithmetic average and geometric mean of measured P concentrations 
LOX16 1/12/1995 12/14/2004 1/1/1995 12/31/2004 113 Irregular 9.5 8.5-8.4 78.0 4.0 
Two values were reported to be less than the LOD. These values were reported 
as -4mg/L on 1/12/95 and 12/14/04. The maximum value equal to 78 mg/L is 
particularly high, it correspond to an "extreme event" that occurred on 5/16/95. 
The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station does not 
exceed the total phosphorus criterion 
For these stations all the samples were collected as grab samples 
*The upper limits of the average and geometric means were calculated replacing the negative values in the time series by the limit-of-detection (LOD), and the 
lower limits were calculated replacing the negative values by half the LOD. A negative value is the convention used by the SFWMD to report values when are 
less than the LOD. The LOD is the absolute value of the number reported. 

9.3 Total Phosphorus Data – “ENHANCED” Stations 
There are thirty nine “Enhanced” stations inside the Loxahatchee Refuge. However, data 
for these stations are only available after June 2004, and the number of data points 
available for TP varies between just 4 and 7. The location of the “Enhanced” monitoring 
sites is shown in Figure 18. The arithmetic averages for the enhanced sites range from 7.8 
to 188.4 mg/L, and the geometric means from 7.4 to 138 mg/L. The TP mean 
concentration for all the enhanced sites together is 49.9 mg/L. The high values of the 
means and their wide ranges are related to the fact that some of the sites are located close 
to the rim canal, and are affected by the penetration of canal water into the marsh. Table 
22 shows a summary of the TP data for the enhanced sites, and also the major 
observations and modifications to these data. 
Figure 18. Location of the “Enhanced” Water Quality Monitoring Sites 

Table 22. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for the "Enhanced" Stations 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
This station is located about 1.5 miles south of S5A pump station. The geometric 
mean of measured P concentrations for this station exceeds the total phosphorus 
LOXA101 9/15/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 23.3 26.8 53.0 14.0 criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located about 1.5 miles northeast of G310 pumping station. The 
geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station exceeds the total 
LOXA102 9/15/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 13.0 12.8 15.0 10.0 phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located about 2 miles northeast of G310 pumping station. The 
geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station exceeds the total 
LOXA103 9/15/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 13.0 12.5 19.0 9.0 phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located in the L-7 Canal, about 0.5 mile north of G 310 pumping 
station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station 
LOXA104 6/8/2004 12/9/2004 7 Irregular 103.3 71.1 237.0 22.0 exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located close to the L-7 Canal, about 0.5 mile northeast of G 310 
pumping station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this 
LOXA105 9/15/2004 12/9/2004 4 Irregular 84.5 52.7 232.0 23.0 station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located close to the L-7 Canal, about 0.6 mile east of G 310 
pumping station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this 
LOXA106 9/15/2004 12/9/2004 4 Irregular 20.0 15.1 48.0 7.0 station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located about 1.5 miles southeast of G 310 pumping station. The 
geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station exceeds the total 
LOXA107 8/3/2004 12/8/2004 5 Irregular 10.8 10.4 16.0 7.0 phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located about 3.0 miles southeast of G 310 pumping station. The 
geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station equals the total 
LOXA108 8/2/2004 12/7/2004 5 Irregular 10.6 10.0 17.0 6.0 phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located about 3.0 miles south-southeast of G 310 pumping station. 
The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station exceeds the 
LOXA109 8/3/2004 12/8/2004 5 Irregular 12.4 11.5 22.0 8.0 total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located about 3.1 miles south-southeast of G 310 pumping station. 
The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station exceeds the 
LOXA110 8/3/2004 12/8/2004 5 Irregular 11.8 11.2 17.0 7.0 total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
For these stations all the samples were collected as grab samples 

Cont. Table 22. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for the "Enhanced" Stations 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
This is an interior station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for 
LOXA111 8/3/2004 12/8/2004 5 Irregular 9.0 8.7 13.0 6.0 this station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located between LOXA111 and the L-7 canal. the geometric mean 
of measured P concentrations for this station exceeds the total phosphorus 
LOXA112 8/3/2004 12/8/2004 5 Irregular 11.6 11.3 15.0 8.0 criterion (10 mg/L). 
This is an interior station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for 
LOXA113 6/8/2004 12/8/2004 6 Irregular 9.0 8.7 14.0 7.0 this station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This is an interior station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for 
LOXA114 6/8/2004 12/8/2004 7 Irregular 13.9 11.9 33.0 6.0 this station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located in the L-7 Canal, about 1 mile north of S-6 pumping station. 
The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station exceeds the 
LOXA115 6/8/2004 12/9/2004 7 Irregular 88.1 66.6 200.0 26.0 total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located close to the L-7 Canal, about 1.2 miles north of S-6 
pumping station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this 
LOXA116 8/3/2004 12/9/2004 5 Irregular 85.0 70.7 199.0 38.0 station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located close to the L-7 Canal, about 1.3 miles northeast of S-6 
pumping station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this 
LOXA117 8/3/2004 12/9/2004 5 Irregular 17.4 17.1 22.0 13.0 station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This is an interior station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for 
LOXA118 6/8/2004 12/9/2004 6 Irregular 8.8 8.1 18.0 6.0 this station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion 
This is an interior station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for 
LOXA119 6/8/2004 12/9/2004 7 Irregular 10.1 9.4 19.0 6.0 this station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion 
This is an interior station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for 
LOXA120 6/8/2004 12/9/2004 6 Irregular 9.0 8.5 16.0 6.0 this station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion 
For these stations all the samples were collected as grab samples 

Cont. Table 22. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for the "Enhanced" Stations 
Sample
Available Data 
Data Information (mg/L) 
Size 
Sampling 
Geometric
Average 
Maximum 
Minimum
Mean
Station 
(number)
Start 
End 
Frequency 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
This station is located close to L-39 canal, about 0.5 mile south of the S-6 
pumping stations. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations greatly 
LOXA121 
4 
Irregular
8/3/2004 
12/9/2004 
106.8 
88.9 
179.0 
32.0 
exceeds the TP criterion 
This station is located 1 mile southeast of S-6 pumping station. The geometric 
mean of measured P concentrations for this station exceeds the total phosphorus 
LOXA122 
5 
Irregular
8/3/2004 
12/9/2004 
12.4 
12.1 
17.0 
10.0 
criterion 
This station is located 3 miles northwest of S-10D structure. The geometric mean 
of measured P concentrations for this station exceeds the total phosphorus 
LOXA123 
5 
Irregular
8/3/2004 
12/9/2004 
15.0 
14.1 
25.0 
8.0 
criterion 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal, about 1 mile northwest of the G94A 
structure. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations greatly 
LOXA124 
4 
Irregular
9/14/2004 
12/7/2004 
62.5 
39.1 
151.0 
15.0 
exceeds the TP criterion 
LOXA125 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal, about 0.3 miles west of the Refuge 
boat ramp. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station 
LOXA126 
5 
Irregular
8/2/2004 
12/7/2004 
13.4 
10.9 
33.0 
6.0 
exceeds the TP criterion 
This station is located about 1.2 miles west of the Refuge boat ramp. The 
geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station exceeds the TP 
LOXA127 
8/2/2004 
12/7/2004 
5 
Irregular 
13.0 
11.2 
27.0 
6.0 
criterion 
This is an interior station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for 
LOXA128 
8/3/2004 
12/9/2004 
5 
Irregular 
12.4 
11.3 
21.0 
7.0 
this station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located in the L-40 canal, about 1 mile south ACME 2 pumping 
stations. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station 
LOXA129 
7 
Irregular
6/7/2004 
12/7/2004 
158.1 
112.9 
499.0 
58.0 
greatly exceeds the TP criterion 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal, about 2.7 miles northwest of the G94C 
structure. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this station 
LOXA130 
4 
Irregular
9/14/2004 
12/7/2004 
73.5 
39.0 
212.0 
11.0 
greatly exceeds the TP criterion 
For these stations all the samples were collected as grab samples 

Cont. Table 22. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for the "Enhanced" Stations 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
This is an interior station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for 
LOXA131 9/14/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 7.8 7.4 10.0 5.0 this station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion 
This station is located in the L-40 canal, below the ACME 1 pump station. This 
station shows the second highest geometric mean of measured P concentrations 
LOXA132 6/7/2004 12/7/2004 7 Irregular 170.4 116.1 574.0 64.0 (116.1 mg/L) 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal, 0.5 miles southwest of the ACME 1 
LOXA133 9/14/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 165.5 138.0 322.0 65.0 pump station. 
This station is located 1 mile west of the ACME 1 pump station, close to L-40 
LOXA134 9/14/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 72.3 42.0 216.0 23.0 canal 
This station is located in the L-40 canal, about 1 mile northwest of the ACME 1 
pump station. This station shows the highest geometric mean of measured P 
concentrations (127.6 mg/L) and the maximum measured value for all the stations 
LOXA135 6/7/2004 12/8/2004 7 Irregular 188.4 127.6 653.0 53.0 (653 mg/L). 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal, about 1.2 miles northwest of the 
LOXA136 9/14/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 108.3 86.3 238.0 40.0 ACME 1 pump station. 
LOXA137 9/14/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 30.5 26.8 57.0 14.0 This station is located 1.4 miles northwest of the ACME 1 pump station. 
This is an interior station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for 
LOXA138 9/14/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 13.0 12.6 18.0 10.0 this station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This is an interior station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for 
LOXA139 9/14/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 12.0 11.7 14.0 8.0 this station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal, about 4 miles southeast of the S5A 
pump station. The geometric mean of measured P concentrations for this 
LOXA140 9/15/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 21.8 19.9 31.0 13.0 station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L). 
For these stations all the samples were collected as grab samples 

9.4 Total Phosphorus Data – XYZ Stations 
There are eleven “XYZ” stations associated with the Loxahatchee Refuge, two canal 
stations (X0 and Z0) and nine marsh stations (X1, X2, X3, X4, Y4, Z1, Z2, Z3, Z4). The 
location of the “XYZ” stations is shown in Figure 19, and the TP time series for each 
station are included in Appendix F2. According to the SFWMD (2000) these stations 
were established along a nutrient gradient in the southwestern corner of the Refuge (see 
Figure 19) for biological and chemical sampling. Data for these stations are available 
from April 1996. The sample size for these sites varies between 107 and 142 values per 
site, for the POR. Arithmetic means of TP concentrations during the period of record 
range between 9.0 and 56.5 mg/L, and the geometric means vary between 8.1 and 49.9 
mg/L. The highest concentration values correspond to canal water, and it declines as the 
distance from the rim canal increases. Figure 20 and 21 shows the variation in the TP 
arithmetic and geometric means, respectively, with respect to the distance from the rim 
canal. In both cases, the TP concentration steadily decreases as the distance from the 
canal increases until about 1.5 Km, where the TP values become almost constant at about 
10 mg/L and independent of the distance from the canal. 
Figure 19. Location of the “XYZ” Water Quality Monitoring Sites 
Table 23 shows a summary of the TP data for the “XYZ” sites, and also the major 
observation and modifications to these data. 

XYZ Station 
0.0 
10.0 
20.0 
30.0 
40.0 
50.0 
60.0 
0 1 2 3 4 5 
Distance from canal (Km) 
TP Arithmetic Average( mg/L) 
Figure 20. TP Arithmetic Means at Refuge Transect Stations with Increasing Distance 
from the Rim Canal 
XYZ Station 
0.0 
10.0 
20.0 
30.0 
40.0 
50.0 
60.0 
0 1 2 3 4 5 
Distance from canal (Km) 
TP Geometric Mean( m g/L) 
Figure 21. TP Geometric Means at Refuge Transect Stations with Increasing Distance 
from the Rim Canal 

Table 23. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for the District Transect Monitoring Sites ("XYZ" Stations) 
Available Data* Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
This location is located in the L-7 canal, about 1.4 Km north of the S-6 pump 
station. The maximum value equal to 230 mg/L corresponds to an "extreme event" 
on 10/19/99. Besides this value, the maximum measured TP concentration is 140 
X0 5/9/1996 12/14/2004 107 Irregular 53.0 48.0 230.0 22.0 mg/L. 
This station is located 0.5 Km from the L-7 canal, about 1.59 Km north of the S-6 
pump station. The geometric mean of measured TP concentrations for this 
X1 4/24/1996 12/14/2004 122 Irregular 39.0 32.0 200.0 6.0 station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
This station is located 1.3 Km from the L-7 canal, about 2.26 Km north-northeast 
of the S-6 pump station. The geometric mean of measured TP concentrations 
X2 4/24/1996 12/14/2004 127 Irregular 16.3 14.7 78.0 4.0 for this station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
This station is located 2.2 Km from the L-7 canal, about 2.59 Km northeast of the 
S-6 pump station. The geometric mean of measured TP concentrations for this 
X3 4/24/1996 12/14/2004 124 Irregular 11.5 9.8 74.0 4.0 station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
This station is located 4.4 Km from the L-7 canal, about 4.69 Km northeast of the 
S-6 pump station. The maximum measured TP concentration reported as 130 
mg/L corresponds to an "extreme event" on 3/25/97. Besides this value, the 
X4 4/24/1996 12/14/2004 136 Irregular 13.1 10.9 130.0 5.0 
maximum TP concentration is 41 mg/L. The geometric mean of measured TP 
concentrations for this station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion 
This station is located 3.2 Km from the L-7 canal, about 4.38 Km east of the S-6 
pump station. The geometric mean of measured TP concentrations for this 
Y4 4/25/1996 12/14/2004 133 Irregular 11.8 9.3 110.0 4.0 station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
For these stations all the samples were collected as grab samples 
*There are not data reported between 10/15/2002 and 5/13/2003 

Cont. Table 23. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for the District Transect Monitoring Sites ("XYZ" Stations) 
Available Data* Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
This location is located in the L-39 canal, about 0.69 Km east-southeast of the S6 
pump station. The maximum value equal to 290 mg/L corresponds to an 
"extreme event" on 10/19/99. Besides this value, the maximum measured TP 
Z0 5/9/1996 12/14/2004 121 Irregular 56.5 49.9 290.0 19.0 concentration is 150 mg/L. 
This station is located 0.3 Km from the L-39 canal, about 0.69 Km east-southeast 
of the S-6 pump station. The maximum value equal to 180 mg/L corresponds to 
an "extreme event" on 6/15/04. The geometric mean of measured TP 
Z1 4/25/1996 12/14/2004 132 Irregular 41.8 36.2 180.0 11.0 concentrations for this station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
This station is located 1.1 Km from the L-39 canal, about 1.94 Km east-southeast 
of the S-6 pump station. The geometric mean of measured TP concentrations 
Z2 4/25/1996 12/14/2004 119 Irregular 15.5 14.5 44.0 6.0 for this station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
This station is located 2.2 Km from the L-39 canal, about 4.0 Km east-southeast 
of the S-6 pump station. The geometric mean of measured TP concentrations 
Z3 4/25/1996 12/14/2004 137 Irregular 10.8 9.2 64.0 4.0 for this station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
This station is located 3.1 Km from the L-39 canal, about 6.38 Km east-southeast 
of the S-6 pump station. The geometric mean of measured TP concentrations 
Z4 4/25/1996 12/14/2004 142 Irregular 9.0 8.1 39.0 4.0 for this station does not exceed the total phosphorus criterion (10 mg/L) 
For these stations all the samples were collected as grab samples 
*There are not data reported between 10/15/2002 and 5/13/2003 

9.5 Total Phosphorus Data – Hydraulic Structure Stations 
As indicated in a previous section, for the POR that goes from 1995 to 2004, there are 19 
hydraulic structures associated with the Refuge. Water quality Data are available from 15 
of these sites (for the complete POR); only the structures G-251, G-338, S-362 and G94A 
(see Figure 10) do not have data available, and structure G-94C presents data for 
only three single days. The data for the G-251 have been requested to the SFWMD. 
Stations S-5A, G-310 and S-6 have grab samples and composite samples. The rest of the 
stations have only grab samples. For the data that was gathered as “grab sample”, and 
excluding station G-94C, the sample size for the period of record ranges between 81 and 
534 samples per site, with a mean equal to 177 samples per station. The TP time series 
for these stations are included in Appendix F3. The TP arithmetic means vary between 
35.2 and127.4 mg/L, and the geometric means vary between 30.7 and 113.1 mg/L 
(excluding station G-94C). The arithmetic mean for all these sites together is equal to 
80.9 mg/L. Table 24A summarizes the information regarding “grab” TP measurements at 
these stations, and indicates the major observations and modifications to the data after the 
quality assurance checks. The composite data are for a 7-days period, and the date 
reported is the last day of the composite. The samples were composite either by time or 
by flow. Table 24B summarizes the information about the composite TP measurements at 
stations S-5A, G-310 and S-6. For the data gathered as “composite sample” the sample 
size for the POR ranges between 160 and 314 samples per site. The TP arithmetic means 
vary between 55.2 and 141.5 mg/L, and the geometric means vary between 44.2 and 
124.0 mg/L. The TP time series for these stations are also included in Appendix F3 
9.6 Total Phosphorus Data – Additional Stations 
Besides the data described in the previous sections, the DBHYDRO database includes 
data for other five stations associated with the Refuge. These stations are known as 
S5AD, S6D, L40-1, L40-2 and ACME1DS. Site S5AD and S-6D are downstream of the 
S-5A and S-6 pumping stations, respectively, and L40-1 and L40-2 are monitoring 
stations on the downstream side of ACME 1 and ACME 2. The site ACME1DS is 
located in the L-40 Canal. According to Waldon (2005) when the pump (ACME-1) is 
flowing this site may not be representative of the L-40 Canal because the sampling point 
is in the discharge from the gated culverts. For these additional stations, the sample size 
varies between 56 and 119 samples per site. The TP arithmetic means range between 57.8 
and 117.5 mg/L, and the geometric means range between 51.9 and 101.8 mg/L. The 
arithmetic mean for the four sites together is equal to 86.0 mg/L. Table 25 summarizes the 
information regarding TP measurements at these stations, and indicates the major 
observations and modifications to the data after the quality assurance checks. The TP 
time series for these additional stations are included in Appendix F. 

Table 24A. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for Monitoring Sites Located at the Hydraulic Structure Locations 
(Grab Samples) 
Start End 
S-5A 1/5/1995 12/28/2004 471 Irregular 
Station 
Available Data Sample 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
125.3 110.7 822.0 30.0 
Data Information (mg/L) 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
Composite samples were also taken in this station (see Table 24B). 
The maximum value equal to 822 mg/L corresponds to an "extreme event" on 
8/10/04. Besides this value, the maximum measured TP concentration is 435 
mg/L. This station was sampled at depths of 0 and 0.5 m 
S-5AS 1/30/1995 11/22/2004 102 Irregular 
G-300 5/3/2000 7/8/2004 111 Irregular 
G-301 4/28/2000 7/8/2004 112 Irregular 
101.0 88.6 272.0 29.0 
107.4 94.1 240.0 24.0 
127.4 113.1 305.0 27.0 
The average TP concentration for this station is 23% lower than the average 
value for S-5A. For this station all samples were taken at a 0.5 m depth 
This station is located in a diversion structure to the L-40 canal. The structure 
started operating on November 1999. For this station all samples were taken at a 
0.5 m depth 
This station is located in a diversion structure to the L-7 canal. The structure 
started operating on August 1999. For this station all samples were taken at a 0.5 
m depth 
G-310 6/1/2000 12/28/2004 247 Irregular 43.8 35.1 273.0 12.0 
Composite samples were also taken in this station (see Table 24B). 
This station is located at the outflow pump station of STA-1W. This station was 
sampled at depths of 0 and 0.5 m. 
G251 
S-6 1/5/1995 12/29/2004 534 Irregular 66.2 51.1 799.0 13.0 
No water quality data is available for this site 
Composite samples were also taken in this station (see Table 24B). 
This station is located upstream of the S-6 pump station. The maximum value 
equal to 799 mg/L corresponds to an "extreme event" on 9/7/99. This station was 
sampled at depths of 0 and 0.5 m. The S-6 pump station discharge was diverted 
away from the Refuge on May 2001 
S-10E 1/5/1995 12/22/2004 123 Irregular 
S-10D 1/5/1995 12/22/2004 140 Irregular 
67.4 58.4 200.0 22.0 
67.6 56.1 306.0 17.0 
This station is located on the L-39 canal. For this station all samples were taken 
at a 0.5 m depth 
This station is located on the L-39 canal. For this station all samples were taken 
at a 0.5 m depth 

Cont. Table 24A. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for Monitoring Sites Located at the Hydraulic Structure Locations 
(Grab Samples) 
Start EndStation 
Available Data Sample 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Data Information (mg/L) 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
S-10C 1/5/1995 10/11/2004 81 Irregular 51.9 42.4 159.0 11.0 
This station is located on the L-39 canal. For this station all samples were taken 
at a 0.5 m depth 
S-10A 1/5/1995 10/11/2004 85 Irregular 38.3 31.5 166.0 10.0 
This station is located on the L-39 canal. For this station all samples were taken 
at a 0.5 m depth 
S-39 1/5/1995 12/22/2004 170 Irregular 35.2 30.7 148.0 6.0 
This station is located on the L-39 canal. For this station all samples were taken 
at a 0.5 m depth 
ACME-1 2/5/1997 12/22/2004 106 Irregular 76.0 66.8 348.0 27.0 
This station is located on the L-40 canal. For this station all samples were taken 
at a 0.5 m depth 
G-94D 2/5/1997 12/22/2004 109 Irregular 
G-94C 3/19/2001 4/10/2001 3 Irregular 
96.4 83.4 305.0 21.0 
478.3 398.3 898.0 227.0 
This station is located on the L-40 canal. For this station all samples were taken 
at a 0.5 m depth 
This station is located on the L-40 canal. Only three values are reported for this 
station. This station shows the maximum TP measured concentration for the 
structure sites and also in general (898 mg/L) 
G-94B 8/25/1997 12/22/2004 87 Irregular 
G-94A 
89.5 62.6 495.0 18.0 
No water quality data is available for this site 
This station is located on the L-40 canal. For this station all samples were taken 
at a 0.5 m depth 

Table 24B. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for Monitoring Sites Located at the Hydraulic Structure Locations 
(Composite Samples) 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
The 314 samples were taken as flow composite samples (ACF). Grab samples 
were also taken in this station. A value reported as -4mg/L on 4/4/95 was replaced 
by 4mg/L. A negative values is the convention used by the SFWMD to report 
S-5A 5/23/1995 12/28/2004 314 Irregular 141.5 124.0 460.0 4.0 
values when they are less than the detection limit. The detection limit is the 
absolute value of the number reported. 
From the 160 composite samples 19 are time composite samples (ACT) and 141 
are flow composite samples. Grab samples were also taken in this station (see 
Table 24A). This station is located at the outflow pump station of STA-1W. The 
G-310 7/18/2000 12/28/2004 160 Irregular 55.2 44.2 493.0 14.0 maximum value equal to 493 mg/L corresponds to an "extreme event" on 3/11/03. 
The 312 samples were taken as flow composite samples (ACF). Grab samples 
were also taken in this station. The maximum value equal to 722 mg/L 
corresponds to an extreme envent on 3/18/97. Besides this value, the maximum 
S-6 2/21/1995 12/29/2004 312 Irregular 80.9 68.9 722.0 16.0 
measured TP concentration is 341 mg/L. The S-6 pump station discharge was 
diverted away from the Refuge on May 2001 

Table 25. Summary of Total Phosphorus Data Information for Additional Monitoring Sites Associated with the Refuge 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
This station is downstream of the S-5A pump and was inside of the Refuge until 
roughly 1999 when the S-5A was isolated from the Refuge (Waldon, 2005) 
The maximum value equal to 817 mg/L corresponds to an "extreme event" on 
S5AD 1/11/1995 12/13/2004 119 Irregular 117.5 101.8 817.0 19.0 8/9/04. This station was sampled at depths of 0 and 0.5 m. 
This station is downstream of the S-6 pump station. This site was not collected 
S6D 1/12/1995 12/4/2001 84 Irregular 57.8 51.9 210.0 20.0 after December 2001. This station was sampled at depths of 0 and 0.5 m 
This station is located on the downstream side of the ACME 1 structure in the L-
L40-1 1/5/1995 1/4/1999 59 Irregular 80.6 68.8 410.0 28.0 40 canal. All samples were taken at a 0.5 m depth 
This station is located on the downstream side of the ACME 2 structure in the L-
L40-2 1/5/1995 1/4/1999 56 Irregular 85.7 71.7 383.0 24.0 40 canal. All samples were taken at a 0.5 m depth 
ACME1DS 2/5/1997 12/22/2004 106 Irregular 76.0 66.8 348.0 27.0 This station is located in the L-40 canal. All samples were taken at a 0.5 m depth 

9.7 Chloride Data – EVPA Stations 
Ten years (1995 to 2004) of chloride (Cl) data were retrieved from the DBHYDRO 
database for the fourteen EVPA monitoring sites (see Figure 17). The sample size for Cl 
varies between 41 and 112 data points per site for the POR. The Cl arithmetic means 
range between 13.5 and 67.6 mg/L and the geometric means between 12.7 and 58.0 mg/L 
(see Table 26). The arithmetic mean for all the EVPA Cl measurements during the POR 
is equal to 31.8 mg/L. Table 26 indicates, for each EVPA site, the arithmetic average, the 
geometric mean, the maximum and the minimum reported value, the sample size, and the 
start and end dates of the available chloride data (all this information is according to the 
selected POR). This table also summarizes the major observations to the data and the 
modifications it underwent after the quality assurance checks. The time series for 
chloride are shown in Appendix F5. The relationship between TP and Cl arithmetic and 
geometry means can be observed in Figures 22 and 23, respectively. There is virtually no 
correlation between TP and Cl averages for the EVPA stations. 
EVPA Stations 
R2 = 0.0164 
0.0 
2.0 
4.0 
6.0 
8.0 
10.0 
12.0 
14.0 
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 
Cl Arithmetic Average (mg/L) 
TP Arithmetic Average(mg/L) 
Figure 22. TP vs. Cl Arithmetic Means at EVPA Stations 
EVPA Stations 
R2 = 0.0257 
0.0 
2.0 
4.0 
6.0 
8.0 
10.0 
12.0 
14.0 
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 
Cl Geometric Mean (mg/L) 
TP Geometric Mean(mg/L) 
Figure 23. TP vs. Cl Geometric Means at EVPA Stations 

Table 26. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the EVPA Stations 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data* 
This station was sampled at different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth 
shows almost no correlation, however, Cl sligthly decreases as the 
depth increases. The data show a period of high concentration (mean 
LOX3 1/11/1995 10/18/2004 41 Irregular 25.6 19.1 96.0 8.1 equal to 87 mg/L) between 11/13/95 and 4/15/96 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal. It was sampled at 
different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth shows no correlation. This 
station shows the highest arithmetic average and geometric mean for 
LOX4 1/11/1995 12/13/2004 66 Irregular 67.6 58.0 170.0 12.0 the measured Cl values 
This station was sampled at different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth 
shows almost no correlation, however, Cl sligthly decreases as the 
LOX5 1/11/1995 10/18/2004 55 Irregular 18.2 16.5 48.0 6.1 depth increases. 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal. It was sampled at 
different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth shows no correlation, however, 
Cl slighlty increases as the Depth increases. The data for this station is 
LOX6 1/11/1995 12/14/2004 95 Irregular 41.3 33.6 120.0 1.8 highly variable (standard deviation equal to 25.6 mg/L) 
LOX7 1/11/1995 12/13/2004 87 Irregular 23.4 21.0 55.0 5.4 
This station was sampled at different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth 
shows no correlation 
This station was sampled at different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth 
LOX8 1/11/1995 12/13/2004 94 Irregular 18.8 17.2 46.0 4.8 shows no correlation 
This station was sampled at different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth 
LOX9 1/11/1995 10/18/2004 65 Irregular 21.0 17.9 93.0 6.7 
shows no correlation. The maximum value equal to 93 mg/L 
corresponds to an "extreme event" on 11/6/2000 
This station is located close to the L-7 canal. It was sampled at different 
depths. The graph Cl vs Depth shows no correlation. The data for this 
LOX10 1/11/1995 11/15/2004 66 Irregular 50.0 36.5 150.0 10.6 station is highly variable (standard deviation equal to 40.7 mg/L) 
This station was sampled at different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth 
LOX11 1/12/1995 12/14/2004 86 Irregular 14.7 13.9 27.3 5.5 
shows almost no correlation, however, Cl sligthly increases as the 
depth increases. 

Cont. Table 26. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the EVPA Stations 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data* 
This station is located close to the L-39 canal. It was sampled at 
different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth shows no correlation. The 
data for this station is highly variable (standard deviation equal to 30.4 
LOX12 1/12/1995 12/14/2004 112 Irregular 42.8 34.5 124.3 5.5 mg/L) 
This station was sampled at different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth 
shows almost no correlation, however, Cl sligthly increases as the 
depth increases. This station shows the lowest arithmetic average and 
LOX13 1/12/1995 12/14/2004 83 Irregular 13.5 12.7 34.3 4.5 geometric mean for the measured Cl values 
This station was sampled at different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth 
shows almost no correlation, however, Cl sligthly increases as the 
depth increases. The maximum value equal to 115 mg/L corresponds 
LOX14 1/12/1995 12/14/2004 101 Irregular 23.2 18.4 115.0 6.3 to an "extreme event" on 9/9/03 
This station is located close to the L-39 canal. It was sampled at 
different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth shows no correlation, however, 
Cl sligthly increases as the depth increases. The data for this station 
LOX15 1/12/1995 12/14/2004 109 Irregular 60.4 48.3 140.0 6.5 is highly variable (standard deviation equal to 37.3 mg/L) 
This station was sampled at different depths. The graph Cl vs Depth 
shows almost no correlation, however, Cl sligthly increases as the 
depth increases. The maximum value equal to 97.2 mg/L corresponds 
LOX16 1/12/1995 12/14/2004 103 Irregular 19.5 16.1 97.2 0.2 to an "extreme event" on 8/10/04 
* See Chloride time series for EVPA Stations
All the Cl samples for the EVPA stations were collected as grab samples. 

9.8 Chloride Data – “Enhanced” Stations 
As indicated before, there are 39 “Enhanced” stations inside the Loxahatchee Refuge, but 
data for these stations are only available after June 2004 (see Figure 18). The number of 
data points available for Cl varies between just 3 and 7. All the CL samples at the 
“Enhanced” stations were collected as grab samples. The Cl arithmetic averages for the 
enhanced sites range from 16.9 and 114.0 mg/L, and the geometric means from 16.2 to 
110.2 mg/L. The Cl mean concentration for all the enhanced sites together is 58.7 mg/L. 
As in the case of the total phosphorus, the high values of the means and their wide ranges 
are related to the fact that some of the sites are located close to the rim canal, and are 
affected by the penetration of canal water into the marsh. Table 27 shows a summary of 
the Cl data for the enhanced sites, and also the major observations and modifications to 
these data. Figure 24 and 25 show the relationship between the means of TP and Cl for 
the enhanced stations. These figures show that the TP means tend to increase as the Cl 
means increases, however a poor correlation is observed between the variables. 
Enhanced Stations 
R2 = 0.280 
0.0 
50.0 
100.0 
150.0 
200.0 
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 
Cl Arithmetic Average (mg/L) 
TP Arithmetic Average(ug/L) 
Figure 24. TP vs. Cl Arithmetic Means at “Enhanced” Stations 
Enhanced Stations 
R2 = 0.302 
0.0 
50.0 
100.0 
150.0 
200.0 
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 
Cl Geometric Mean (mg/L) 
TP Geometric Mean(ug/L) 
Figure 25. TP vs. Cl Geometric Means at “Enhanced” Stations 

Table 27. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the “Enhanced” Stations 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
LOXA101 9/15/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 73.4 71.7 85.3 49.2 This station is located about 1.5 miles south of S5A pump station. 
This station is located about 1.5 miles northeast of G310 pumping 
LOXA102 9/15/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 64.6 55.7 127.0 32.7 station. 
This station is located about 2 miles northeast of G310 pumping 
LOXA103 9/15/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 69.6 62.8 118.0 37.0 station. 
This station is located in the L-7 Canal, about 0.5 mile north of G 310 
LOXA104 6/8/2004 12/9/2004 7 Irregular 114.0 110.2 175.0 80.1 pumping station. 
This station is located close to the L-7 Canal, about 0.5 mile northeast 
of G 310 pumping station. This station shows the highest arithmetic 
average and geometric mean of observed Cl concentrations for the 
LOXA105 9/15/2004 12/9/2004 4 Irregular 76.2 75.9 84.0 65.2 Enhanced stations. 
This station is located close to the L-7 Canal, about 0.6 mile east of G 
LOXA106 9/15/2004 12/9/2004 4 Irregular 63.6 60.8 97.5 44.9 310 pumping station. 
This station is located about 1.5 miles southeast of G 310 pumping 
LOXA107 9/15/2004 12/8/2004 3 Irregular 75.5 69.2 95.9 36.8 station. 
This station is located about 3.0 miles southeast of G 310 pumping 
LOXA108 9/15/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 25.8 25.2 33.4 19.2 station. 
This station is located about 3.0 miles south-southeast of G 310 
LOXA109 9/15/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 43.5 36.5 88.7 20.1 pumping station. 
This station is located about 3.1 miles south-southeast of G 310 
LOXA110 9/15/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 22.8 22.1 31.8 16.6 pumping station. 
LOXA111 9/15/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 27.3 22.4 59.4 12.7 This is an interior station. 
LOXA112 9/15/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 39.9 31.9 92.1 19.2 This station is located between LOXA111 and the L-7 canal. 
LOXA113 9/15/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 22.0 19.5 40.6 11.4 This is an interior station. 

Cont. Table 27. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the “Enhanced” Stations 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
LOXA114 9/15/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 17.9 17.0 25.4 10.8 This is an interior station. 
This station is located in the L-7 Canal, about 1 mile north of S-6 
LOXA115 6/8/2004 12/9/2004 7 Irregular 106.5 103.6 148.0 71.4 pumping station. 
This station is located close to the L-7 Canal, about 1.2 miles north of SLOXA116 
8/3/2004 12/9/2004 5 Irregular 85.8 81.9 135.0 57.0 6 pumping station. 
This station is located close to the L-7 Canal, about 1.3 miles northeast 
LOXA117 9/16/2004 12/9/2004 4 Irregular 78.9 73.5 123.0 51.3 of S-6 pumping station. 
LOXA118 9/16/2004 12/9/2004 4 Irregular 47.4 41.9 87.1 26.2 This is an interior station. 
LOXA119 6/8/2004 12/9/2004 6 Irregular 21.0 20.5 30.6 15.9 This is an interior station. 
LOXA120 8/3/2004 12/9/2004 5 Irregular 18.3 17.8 23.5 11.8 This is an interior station. 
This station is located close to L-39 canal, about 0.5 mile south of the SLOXA121 
8/3/2004 12/9/2004 4 Irregular 81.6 81.1 95.0 70.8 6 pumping stations. 
LOXA122 9/16/2004 12/9/2004 4 Irregular 97.3 95.8 123.0 78.7 This station is located 1 mile southeast of S-6 pumping station. 
LOXA123 9/16/2004 12/9/2004 4 Irregular 62.2 62.1 66.7 59.6 This station is located 3 miles northwest of S-10D structure. 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal, about 1 mile northwest 
LOXA124 9/14/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 24.4 23.3 37.8 17.7 of the G-94A structure. 
LOXA125 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal, about 0.3 miles west of 
LOXA126 9/14/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 53.8 51.0 86.5 40.9 the Refuge boat ramp. 
LOXA127 9/14/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 28.8 28.6 34.6 25.1 This station is located about 1.2 miles west of the Refuge boat ramp. 

Cont. Table 27. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the “Enhanced” Stations 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
This is an interior station. This station shows the lowest arithmetic 
average and geometric mean of observed Cl concentrations for the 
LOXA128 9/16/2004 12/9/2004 4 Irregular 16.9 16.2 21.5 10.6 Enhanced stations. 
This station is located in the L-40 canal, about 1 mile south ACME 2 
LOXA129 6/7/2004 12/7/2004 7 Irregular 81.3 77.1 130.0 54.0 pumping stations. 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal, about 2.7 miles 
LOXA130 9/14/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 56.3 53.8 66.6 30.7 northwest of the G-94C structure. 
This is an interior station. This stations showed the lowest arithmetic 
average and geometric mean of measured TP concentrations, 
LOXA131 9/14/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 62.5 60.6 87.5 45.3 however, the Cl concentrations are relatively high 
This station is located in the L-40 canal, below the ACME 1 pump 
LOXA132 6/7/2004 12/7/2004 7 Irregular 86.1 82.6 124.0 50.0 station. 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal, 0.5 miles southwest of 
LOXA133 9/14/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 58.0 55.7 69.7 33.2 the ACME 1 pump station. 
This station is located 1 mile west of the ACME 1 pump station, close 
LOXA134 9/14/2004 12/7/2004 4 Irregular 54.0 52.0 65.3 32.1 to L-40 canal 
This station is located in the L-40 canal, about 1 mile northwest of the 
LOXA135 6/7/2004 12/8/2004 7 Irregular 85.5 82.3 122.0 59.6 ACME 1 pump station. 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal, about 1.2 miles 
LOXA136 9/14/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 57.0 56.5 64.4 48.3 northwest of the ACME 1 pump station. 
This station is located 1.4 miles northwest of the ACME 1 pump 
LOXA137 9/14/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 49.9 47.9 72.8 35.5 station. 
LOXA138 9/14/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 51.7 46.2 84.8 26.2 This is an interior station. 
LOXA139 9/14/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 24.1 23.6 31.4 17.7 This is an interior station. 
This station is located close to the L-40 canal, about 4 miles southeast 
of the S-5A pump station. The geometric mean of measured P 
concentrations for this station exceeds the total phosphorus criterion 
LOXA140 9/15/2004 12/8/2004 4 Irregular 54.4 49.5 96.3 30.2 (10 mg/L). 

9.9 Chloride Data – XYZ Stations 
As indicated before, there are eleven “XYZ” stations associated with the Loxahatchee 
Refuge, two canal stations and nine marsh stations (see Figure 19). Chloride data for 
these stations are available from April 1996. For this period of record, the sample size 
varies between 103 and 121 data points per station. The Cl arithmetic means vary 
between 40.4 and 148.6 mg/L, and the geometric means range between 34.1 and 138.7 
mg/L. The arithmetic mean of all the Cl measurements during the period of record is 
equal to 92.7 mg/L. As in the case of TP, the Cl concentration exhibits a gradient of 
decreasing concentrations as the distance from the rim canal increases (see Figures 26 
and 27). However, as shown in Figure 26, the gradient for the TP is steeper and the 
concentrations decrease to a fairly constant value (about 10 mg/L) within the first 1.5 Km. 
The Cl concentration decreases less rapidly and it seems to drop to a relative constant-
interior value (about 50 mg/L) within 3.2 Km of the rim canal. The relationship between 
TP and Cl means for these stations are shown in Figures 28 and 29. The data in these 
Figures can be grouped into two different sets: (a) the stations close to the canal (distance 
to the canal less than 0.6 Km) that show high values for both TP and Cl, and (b) the 
stations located in the interior zone (distance to the canal greater than 0.6 Km) that show 
a almost constant value for the TP (varying between 9.0 and 16.3 mg/L for the arithmetic 
averages) and a variable Cl concentration (varying between 40.4 and 105.5 mg/L for the 
arithmetic averages). This tendency is not surprising, since the Cl is a more conservative 
substance than TP. TP concentrations are affected by biological uptake and other biochemical 
processes in the marsh, while the Cl concentrations basically decline as the 
result of dilution (SFW*-/MD, 2001). Table 28 summarizes the information for the Cl 
data at the “XYZ” sites. This Table indicates the major observations to the data. The Cl 
time series for each site during the period of record are included in Appendix F6. 
XYZ Stations 
0.0 
20.0 
40.0 
60.0 
80.0 
100.0 
120.0 
140.0 
160.0 
0 1 2 3 4 5 
Distance from canal (Km) 
Cl ArithmeticAverage (mg/L) 
0.0 
10.0 
20.0 
30.0 
40.0 
50.0 
60.0 
70.0 
80.0 
TP ArithmeticAverage (mg/L)
Cl 
TP 
Figure 26. Cl and TP Arithmetic Means at Refuge Transect Stations with Increasing 
Distance from the Rim Canal 

Table 28. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the “XYZ” Stations 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
This location is located in the L-7 canal, about 1.4 Km north of the S-6 
X0 5/9/1996 12/14/2004 107 Irregular 133.0 127.2 230.0 50.0 pump station. This station was sampled at a 0.5 m depth. 
This station is located 0.5 Km from the L-7 canal, about 1.59 Km north 
of the S-6 pump station. This station was sampled at different depths. 
X1 4/24/1996 12/14/2004 105 Irregular 122.9 118.5 190.0 40.0 The graph Cl vs depth shows no correlation. 
This station is located 1.3 Km from the L-7 canal, about 2.26 Km north-
northeast of the S-6 pump station. This station was sampled at 
different depths. The graph Cl vs depth shows almost no correlation, 
X2 4/24/1996 12/14/2004 109 Irregular 100.0 91.2 170.0 29.0 however, Cl slightly increases as the depth increases. 
This station is located 2.2 Km from the L-7 canal, about 2.59 Km 
northeast of the S-6 pump station. This station was sampled at 
different depths. The graph Cl vs depth shows almost no correlation, 
X3 4/24/1996 12/14/2004 106 Irregular 80.2 69.5 160.0 23.0 however, Cl slightly increases as the depth increases. 
This station is located 4.4 Km from the L-7 canal, about 4.69 Km 
northeast of the S-6 pump station. This station was sampled at different 
depths. The graph Cl vs depth shows almost no correlation, however, 
X4 4/24/1996 12/14/2004 113 Irregular 49.5 39.9 140.0 12.0 Cl slightly decreases as the depth increases. 
This station is located 3.2 Km from the L-7 canal, about 4.38 Km east 
of the S-6 pump station. This station was sampled at different depths. 
The graph Cl vs depth shows almost no correlation, however, Cl slightly 
Y4 4/25/1996 12/14/2004 111 Irregular 50.6 40.8 160.0 11.0 decreases as the depth increases. 
For these stations all the samples were collected as grab samples 
*There are not data reported between 10/15/2002 and 5/13/2003 

Cont. Table 28. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the “XYZ” Stations 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
This station is located in the L-39 canal, about 0.69 Km east-southeast 
of the S-6 pump station. This station was sampled at a 0.5 m depth. 
The arithmetic average and geometry mean of the data before 
10/15/2002 are 131.8 and 125.4 mg/L, respectively. The arithmetic 
average and geometric mean of the data for the period between 
Z0 5/9/1996 12/14/2004 121 Irregular 148.6 138.7 298.0 47.0 5/13/2003 and 12/14/2004 are 228.6 and 224.3 mg/L, respectively. 
This station is located 0.3 Km from the L-39 canal, about 0.69 Km east-
southeast of the S-6 pump station. This station was sampled at 
different depths. The graph Cl vs depth shows almost no correlation, 
Z1 4/25/1996 12/14/2004 112 Irregular 125.8 122.9 190.0 57.0 however, Cl slightly decreases as the depth increases. 
This station is located 1.1 Km from the L-39 canal, about 1.94 Km east-
southeast of the S-6 pump station. This station was sampled at 
different depths. The graph Cl vs depth shows almost no correlation, 
Z2 4/25/1996 12/14/2004 103 Irregular 105.5 101.5 180.0 38.0 however, Cl slightly increases as the depth increases. 
This station is located 2.2 Km from the L-39 canal, about 4.0 Km east-
southeast of the S-6 pump station. This station was sampled at 
different depths. The graph Cl vs depth shows almost no correlation, 
Z3 4/25/1996 12/14/2004 119 Irregular 68.3 59.9 170.0 18.0 however, Cl slightly increases as the depth increases. 
This station is located 3.1 Km from the L-39 canal, about 6.38 Km east-
southeast of the S-6 pump station. This station was sampled at 
different depths. The graph Cl vs depth shows almost no correlation, 
Z4 4/25/1996 12/14/2004 120 Irregular 40.4 34.1 130.0 11.0 however, Cl slightly decreases as the depth increases. 
For these stations all the samples were collected as grab samples 
*There are not data reported between 10/15/2002 and 5/13/2003 

XYZ Stations 
0.0 
20.0 
40.0 
60.0 
80.0 
100.0 
120.0 
140.0 
160.0 
0 1 2 3 4 5 
Distance from canal (Km) 
Chloride Geometric Mean(mg/L) 
Figure 27. Cl Geometric Means at Refuge Transect Stations with Increasing Distance 
from the Rim Canal 
XYZ Stations 
0.0 
10.0 
20.0 
30.0 
40.0 
50.0 
60.0 
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 
Cl Arithmetic Average (mg/L) 
TP Arithmetic Average ( m g/L)
Stations close to the 
rim canal (d< 0.6 Km) 
Figure 28. TP vs. Cl Arithmetic Means at “XYZ” Stations 

XYZ Stations 
0.0 
10.0 
20.0 
30.0 
40.0 
50.0 
60.0 
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 
Cl Geometric Mean (mg/L) 
TP Geometric Mean ( mg/L)
Stations close to the 
rim canal (d< 0.6 Km) 
Figure 29. TP vs. Cl Geometric Means at “XYZ” Stations 
9.10 Chloride Data – Hydraulic Structure Stations 
Chloride Data are available at 13 of 19 hydraulic structure locations around the Refuge 
for the period that goes form January 1995 to December 2004. Structures G-300, G-301, 
G-251, G-94A, G-338 and S-362 do not have data available, and the site associated with 
structure G-94C only presents data for three days (between March and April 2001). 
However, Cl data for the G-300 and G-301 may be assumed to be equal to the S-5A 
because of its proximity. Data for the G-251 have been requested from the SFWMD. 
Excluding station G-94C, the Cl sample size for the period of record ranges between 81 
and 218 samples per site, with a mean equal to 129 samples per station. The Cl time 
series for these stations are included in Appendix F7. The Cl arithmetic means vary 
between 49.7 and 148.7 mg/L, and the geometric means vary between 49.0 and 144.6 
mg/L (excluding station G-94C). The arithmetic mean for all these sites together is equal 
to 113.2 mg/L. Table 29 summarizes the information regarding Cl measurements at these 
stations, and indicates the major observations and modifications to the data after the 
quality assurance checks. 
Figures 30 and 31 show the relationships between the TP and Cl arithmetic and geometry 
means, respectively. For these stations, both the TP and the Cl concentrations are 
considerably higher than that of the interior stations. However, there is no correlation 
between the long term average TP and Cl concentrations. 

TP vs. Cl at Hydraulic Structures 
TP Arithmetic Average ( mg/L)
140.0 
120.0 
100.0 
R2 = 0.0002 
80.0 
60.0 
40.0 
20.0 
0.0 
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 
Cl Arithmetic Average (mg/L) 
Figure 30. TP vs. Cl Arithmetic Means at Monitoring Sites Associated with the 
Hydraulic Structures 
TP vs. Cl at Hydraulic Structures 
Mean Cl 
concentration 
for EVPA 
stations 
Mean TP concentration for EVPA stations 
TP Geometric Mean(mg/L) 
140.0 
120.0 
100.0 
80.0 
60.0 
40.0 
20.0 
0.0 
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 
Cl Geometric Mean (mg/L) 
Figure 31. TP vs. Cl Geometric Means at Monitoring Sites Associated with the 
Hydraulic Structures
R2 = 0.0005 

Table 29. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the Monitoring Site at Hydraulic Structure Locations 
Start End 
S-5A 1/5/1995 12/28/2004 218 Irregular 
S-5AS 1/30/1995 12/22/2004 103 Irregular 
Station 
Available Data Sample 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
135.1 121.9 344.8 37.5 
109.4 100.3 252.3 5.4 
Data Information (mg/L) 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
All the Cl samples were taken at a 0.5 m depth. The data for this 
station is highly variable (standard deviation= 59.3 mg/L). Some of the 
variability in Cl concentration may result from whether the water source 
is the Everglades Agricultural Area or discharge from Lake 
Okeechobee 
The average Cl value for this station is 20% lower than the average 
value for S-5A. The minimum value equal to 5.4 mg/L corresponds to 
an "extreme event" on 10/23/95. Besides this value, the minimum value 
is equal to 39.4 mg/L. The data for this station is highly variable. Flow 
at this structure is bi-directional, and variability may result from 
alteration of source water from the Refuge or S-5A pump, or the L-8 
Basin runoff (Waldon, 2005). For this station all samples were taken at 
a 0.5 m depth 
G-300 No chloride data is available for this site 
G-301 
G-310 7/18/2000 12/28/2004 117 Irregular 148.7 144.6 264.2 77.3 
No chloride data is available for this site 
This structure is located at the outflow pump station of STA-1W. 
Almost all the Cl samples were taken at a 0.5 m depth. This structure 
started operating on May 1999, approximately 437 days of chloride 
data are missing. This station shows the highest arithmetic average 
and geometric mean of measured Cl concentrations. 
G251 
S-6 1/5/1995 12/21/2004 200 Irregular 
All the Cl samples were collected as grab samples. 
143.4 133.9 756.0 42.2 
No water quality data is available for this site 
This structure is located at upstream of the S-6 pump station. A value 
reported equal to -0.1 mg/L on 10/11/99 was removed from the time 
series. The maximum value equal to 756 mg/L corresponds to an 
"extreme event" on 7/8/97. Besides this value, the maximum value is 
equal to 275 mg/L. Almost all the Cl samples were taken at a 0.5 m 
depth. 

Cont. Table 29. Summary of Chloride Data Information for the Monitoring Site at Hydraulic Structure Locations 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
This station is located on the L-7 canal. For this station all samples 
were taken at a 0.5 m depth. No data is reported on 7/8/97 (data of 
S-10E 1/5/1995 12/22/2004 126 Irregular 128.4 124.1 197.4 43.3 "extreme event" for S-6) 
This station is located on the L-39 canal. For this station all samples 
were taken at a 0.5 m depth. The data report a value equal to 101.7 
mg/L on 7/8/97, which is not consistent with values reported on the 
S-10D 1/5/1995 12/22/2004 141 Irregular 122.3 117.0 184.1 19.5 same day for stations S-6 and S-10C. 
This station is located on the L-39 canal. The maximum value equal to 
633.9 mg/L corresponds to an "extreme event" on 7/8/97. Besides this 
value, the maximum value is equal to 167.5 mg/L. For this station all 
S-10C 1/5/1995 10/11/2004 81 Irregular 117.4 106.5 633.9 22.0 samples were taken at a 0.5 m depth 
This station is located on the L-39 canal. For this station all samples 
were taken at a 0.5 m depth. No data is reported on 7/8/97 (data of 
S-10A 1/5/1995 10/11/2004 83 Irregular 86.9 77.0 158.9 13.2 "extreme event" for S-6) 
This station is located on the L-39 canal. For this station all samples 
were taken at a 0.5 m depth. No data is reported on 7/8/97 (data of 
S-39 1/5/1995 12/22/2004 174 Irregular 90.4 81.9 174.8 14.2 "extreme event" for S-6) 
This station is located on the L-40 canal. For this station all samples 
ACME-1 2/5/1997 12/22/2004 109 Irregular 89.5 83.8 171.0 24.2 were taken at a 0.5 m depth 
This station is located on the L-40 canal. For this station all samples 
G-94D 2/5/1997 12/22/2004 112 Irregular 61.5 52.3 156.9 18.3 were taken at a 0.5 m depth 
This station is located on the L-40 canal. Only three values are 
G-94C 3/19/2001 4/10/2001 3 Irregular 49.7 49.0 59.1 40.1 reported for this station 
This station is located on the L-40 canal. For this station all samples 
G-94B 8/25/1997 12/22/2004 87 Irregular 74.4 67.9 162.1 19.2 were taken at a 0.5 m depth 
G-94A No water quality data is available for this site 
All the Cl samples were collected as grab samples. 

9.11 Chloride Data – Additional Stations 
Chloride data for the S5AD, S6D, L40-1, L40-2 and ACME1DS sites were also retrieved 
from the DBHYDRO database. For these additional stations, the Cl sample size varies 
between 60 and 116 samples per site. The Cl arithmetic means range between 42.9 and 
128.0 mg/L, and the geometric means range between 37.9 and 117.6 mg/L. The 
arithmetic mean for the four sites together is equal to 103.0 mg/L. Table 30 summarizes 
the information regarding Cl measurements at these stations, and indicates the major 
observations and modifications to the data after the quality assurance checks. 

Table 30. Summary of Chloride Data Information for Additional Monitoring Sites Associated with the Refuge 
Available Data Sample Data Information (mg/L) 
Station Start End 
Size 
(number) 
Sampling 
Frequency 
Average 
Geometric 
Mean 
Maximum Minimum 
Observations/Modifications to Data 
This station is downstream of the S-5A pump and was inside of the 
Refuge until roughly 1999 when the S-5A was isolated from the Refuge 
(Waldon, 2005). The data for this station is highly variable (standard 
deviation= 51.8 mg/L). This station was sampled at depths of 0 and 0.5 
S5AD 1/11/1995 12/13/2004 116 Irregular 128.0 117.6 272.0 50.0 m. 
This station is downstream of the S-6 pump station. This site was not 
collected after December 2001. This station was sampled at depths of 
S6D 1/12/1995 12/4/2001 79 Irregular 128.0 123.8 210.0 67.0 0 and 0.5 m 
This station is located on the downstream side of the ACME 1 structure 
L40-1 1/5/1995 1/4/1999 61 Irregular 92.1 85.1 201.6 28.9 in the L-40 canal. All samples were taken at a 0.5 m depth 
This station is located on the downstream side of the ACME 2 structure 
L40-2 1/5/1995 1/4/1999 60 Irregular 42.9 37.9 177.1 12.5 in the L-40 canal. All samples were taken at a 0.5 m depth 
This station is located in the L-40 canal. All samples were taken at a 
ACME1DS 2/5/1997 12/22/2004 69 Irregular 94.3 87.9 171.0 24.2 0.5 m depth 
For these stations all the samples were collected as grab samples 

10. Conclusions and Recommendations
The main goal of this report was to compile and summarize the availability of data to 
support the Refuge hydrodynamic and water quality modeling effort. TP was selected as 
the main water quality parameter to be modeled, and chloride was selected as 
conservative tracer to evaluate the model transport subroutine. Marsh elevations, rim 
canal cross-sections, water level, discharge, rainfall, temperature, evapotranspiration, 
wind, TP and Cl data were gathered and evaluated. 
Overall, it is concluded that the available data is sufficient to achieve most of the 
modeling goals. In other words, the available data is sufficient to develop the boundary 
conditions that will force the hydrodynamic and water quality modules of the model. 
Data is also available for calibration and validation of the numerical model. 
Additional specific conclusions regarding the available field data include: 
o Data describing the interaction between surface and ground water is generally 
unavailable. However, there are estimates and studies that approximate leakage 
rates through the rim levee, and the recharge to groundwater from the marsh 
interior. A more detailed discussion about the surface-ground water interaction and 
the approach to address this issue will be provided in companion reports. 
o Wind direction data is only available at the West Palm Beach International Airport 
(PBI) station for the POR. There are wind-direction data available at three local 
stations but for only limited time (two years). 
o Atmospheric deposition data have not been discussed at this time. These data are 
currently being collected and evaluated. Even though, there is a good amount of 
data on both wet and dry deposition in the Everglades, the available time series 
have significant gaps due to instrumental failures and sample contamination (Ahn, 
1999). The initial approach in this modeling effort will be to use a constant “dry” 
deposition and a constant “wet” rain concentration, and to perform model 
sensitivity analyses to determine whether or not this approach is adequate. 
o It should be noted that there are no velocity measurements in the rim canal or in the 
interior marsh. Therefore, the transport module of the numerical model will be 
evaluated only through the ability to reproduce the spatial and temporal distribution 
of the conservative tracer. 

11. References
Ahn, H. (1999). Statistical modeling of total phosphorus concentrations measured in 
south Florida rainfall. Ecological Modeling, 116, pp.g 33 - 77 
Brandtl, L.A., Kenneth, M.P, and Kitchens W. M. (2000). Patterns of change in tree 
islands in A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge from 1950 to 1991. Wetland 
Vol. 20(1), pp. 1-15. 
Childers, D.L, Doren, R.F., Jones, R., Noe, G.B., Rugge, M, and Scinto, L.J. (2003). 
Decadal Change in Vegetation and Soil Phosphorus Pattern across the Everglades 
Landscape. J. Environ. Qual., 32, pp. 344-362. 
Daroub, S., Stuck, J.D., Rice, R.W., Lang, T.A., and Diaz, O.A. (2002). Implementation 
and Verification of BMPs for Reducing Loading in the EAA and Everglades Agricultural 
Area BMPs for Reducing Particulate Phosphorus Transport. Phase 10 Annual Report, 
WM 754, Everglades Research and Educational Center, Institute of Food and 
Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Belle Glade, Fl. 
Davis, S.M., Gunderson, L.H., Park, W.A., Richardson, J.R. and Mattson, J.E. (1994). 
Landscape dimension, composition, and function in a changing Everglades ecosystem. In 
Everglades: The Ecosystem and Its Restoration, S.M. Davis and J.C. Ogden, (eds.). St. 
Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL, pp. 419-444. 
Desmond, Greg. (2003). High Accuracy Elevation Data: U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, 
VA. 
Germain, G.J. (1998). Surface Water Quality Monitoring Network, Technical 
Memorandum # 356. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL. 
German, E.R. (2000). Regional Evaluation of Evapotranspiration in the Everglades. U.S. 
Geological Survey. Water Resources Investigation Report 00-4217. Tallahassee, Fl. 
Kadlec, R.H. and Knight, R.L. (1996). Treatment Wetlands. CRC Press, Inc. 893 pages. 
Light, S.S. and Dineen, J.W. (1994). Water Control in the Everglades: A Historical 
Perspective. Chapter 4 in Everglades: The Ecosystem and Its Restoration, S.M. Davis and 
J.C. Ogden, (eds.). St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL, pp. 47-84. 
Lin, S.S. (1979). The Application of the Receiving Water Quantity Model to the 
Conservation Areas of South Florida. Resource Planning Department, South Florida 
Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Fl. 
Lin, S., and Gregg, R. (1988). Water Budget Analysis Water Conservation Area 1. Water 
Resources Division. South Florida Water Management District, Fl. 

McCormick, P.V., Rawlik, P.S., Lurding, K. Smith. E.P., and Sklar, F.H. (1996). 
Periphyton-water quality relationships along a nutrient gradient in the northern 
Everglades. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 15, pp. 450-468. 
Mitsch, W.J. (1988). Productivity-hydrology-nutrient models of forested wetlands. In: 
W.J. Mitsch, M. Straskraba and S.E. Jorgesen (Editors), Wetland Modelling, Elsevier,
Amsterdam, pp. 115-132. 
Mitsch, W.J, and Reeder, B.C. (1991). Modelling nutrient retention of a freshwater 
coastal wetland: estimating the roles of primary productivity, sedimentation, resuspension 
and hydrology. Ecological Modelling, 54, pp. 151-187. 
Moustafa, M.Z. and Hamrick, J.M. (2000). Calibration of the Wetland Hydrodynamic 
Model to the Everglades Nutrient Removal Project. Water Quality and Ecosystem 
Modeling, 1, pp. 141-167. 
Raghunathan, R., Slawecki, T., Fontaine, T.D., Chen, Z., Dilks, D.W., Bierman, V.J., and 
Wade, S. (2001). Exploring the dynamics and fate of total phosphorus in the Florida 
Everglades using a calibrated mass balance model. Ecological Modelling, 142, pp. 247259. 
Richardson, J.R., Bryant. W.L., Kitchens, W.M., Matsson, J.E., and Pope, K.R. (1990). 
An Evaluation of Refuge Habitats and Relationship to Water Quality, Quantity, and 
Hydroperiod. Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of 
Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 166 pages. 
SFWMD (2000). 2000 Everglades Consolidated Report. January 2000. South Florida 
Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Fl, 
SFWMD (2001). 2001 Everglades Consolidated Report. January 2000. South Florida 
Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Fl, 
SFWMD (2003). DBHYDRO Browser User Documentation. South Florida Water 
Management District, West Palm Beach, Fl, 82 pages. 
SFWMD (2005). 2005 South Florida Environmental Report. February 2005. South 
Florida Water Management District and Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 
West Palm Beach, Fl, 
Sylvester, S., Waldon, M., and Newman, S. (2005). Personal Communication. 
Stober, J.D., Scheidt, R.J., Thornton, K., Ambrose, R. and France, D. (1996). “South 
Florida Ecosystem Interim Report. Monitoring for Adaptive Management: Implications 
for Ecosystem Restoration”. EPA-904-R-96-008. U.S. EPA Science and Ecosystem 
Support Division, Atlanta, GA. 

USFWS. (2000). A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge. Comprehensive 
Conservation Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. A.R.M. Loxahatchee NWR, Boynton 
Beach, Florida, 362 pages. 
Waldon, M.G. (2005). Refuge water quality and soil data – UF soil 2004. Personal 
Communitaion 
Walker, W.W. (1991). Water quality trends at inflows to Everglades National Park. 
Water Res. Bull. 27(1), pp. 59-72. 
Walker, W.W. (1995). Design for Everglades stormwater treatment areas. Water Res. 
Bull. 31(4), pp. 671-685. 
Weaver, K., and Payne, G. (2004). Chapter 2A: Status of Water Quality in the Everglades 
Protection Area. In: 2004 Everglades Consolidated Report, South Florida Water 
Management District. 

Appendix A 
(Stages Plots) 
A1 Interior Stages 
Station North_Lox 
Time Series RW494 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 2/5/96 7/28/01 9/1/02 
Stage (ft) 
3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A1.1 North_Lox Stage 
Station South_LOX 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Stage (ft) 
Time Series MW671 
Figure A1.2 South_Lox Stage 

Station 1-7 
Time Series 7627 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.3 Station 1-7 Stage 
Station 1-7 
Time Series 15808 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.4 Station 1-7 Stage 

82 
Station 1-7Time Series FE775 (PREF)
4681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.5 Station 1-7 Stage 
Station 1-7 Time Series Comparisony = 0.9911x + 0.1569R2 = 0.9962141516171819141516171819Time Series 15808 Stage (ft)
Time Series FE775 Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.6 Station 1-7 stage time series comparison. 

Station 1-8T 
Time Series 7637 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 
Stage (ft) 
2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A1.7 Station 1-8T Stage 
Station 1-8T 
Time Series 15809 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
Stage (ft) 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A1.8 Station 1-8T Stage 

84 
Station 1-8TTime Series P10314681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.9 Station 1-8T Stage 
Station 1-8T Time Series Comparisony = x + 0.0002R2 = 11314151617181913141516171819Time Series 15809 Stage (ft)
Time Series P1031 Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.10 Station 1-8T stage time series comparison. 

85 
Station 1-8CTime Series 158104681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.11 Station 1-8C Stage 
Station 1-8CTime Series FE7764681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.12 Station 1-8C Stage 

86 
Station 1-8CTime Series P10304681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.13 Station 1-8C Stage 
Station 1-8C Time Series Comaprisony = 1.0007x - 0.0111R2 = 0.999912131415161718191213141516171819Time Series 15810 Stage (ft)
Time Series FE776 Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.14 Station 1-8C stage time series comparison. 

87 
Station 1-8C Time Series Comparisony = x + 0.0004R2 = 1111213141516171819111213141516171819Time Series FE776 Stage (ft)
Time Series P1030 stage (ft) 
Figure A1.15 Station 1-8C stage time series comparison. 
Station 1-9Time Series 76284681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.16 Station 1-9 Stage 

88 
Station 1-9Time Series 158114681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.17 Station 1-9 Stage 
Station 1-9Time Series P10324681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.18 Station 1-9 Stage 

89 
Station 1-9Time Series FE7774681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.19 Station 1-9 Stage 
Station 1-9 Time Series Comparisony = 1.0009x - 0.0122R2 = 0.9994141516171819141516171819Time Series FE777 Stage (ft)
Time Series P1032 Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.20 Station 1-9 stage time series comparison 

90 
Station 1-9 Time Series Comparisony = 0.9983x + 0.0261R2 = 0.9995141516171819141516171819Time Series 15811 Stage (ft)
Time Series FE777 Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.21 Station 1-9 stage time series comparison. 
Station 1-9 Time Series Comparisony = 0.9994x + 0.0096R2 = 1141516171819141516171819Time Series 15811 Stage (ft)
Time Series P1032 Stage (ft) 
Figure A1.22 Station 1-9 stage time series comparison. 

91 
A2 Stages at Flow Control Structures 
Station S-5ATime Series 3184681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.1 Station S-5A Head Water Level 
Station S-5ATime Series TA3824681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.2 Station S-5A Head Water Level 

92 
Station S-5ATime Series 66764681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.3 Station S-5A Head Water Level 
Station S-5A Time Series Comparison 
y = 0.9916x + 0.0661R2 = 0.99217891011121378910111213Time Series 318 Head Water Level (ft)
Time Series 6676 Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.4 Station S-5A head water level time series comparison. 

93 
Station S-5A Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 17891011121378910111213Time Series 318 Head Water Level (ft)
Time Series TA382 Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.5 Station S-5A head water level time series comparison. 
Station S-5A Time Series Comparisony = 1.0021x - 0.0027R2 = 0.99327891011121378910111213Time Series 6676 Head Water Level (ft)
Time Series TA382 Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.6 Station S-5A head water level time series comparison. 

94 
Station S-5A 
Time Series 3204681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.7 Station S-5A Tail Water Level 
Station S-5ATime Series 66774681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.8 Station S-5A Tail Water Level 

95 
Station S-5ATime Series TA3844681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.9 Station S-5A Tail Water Level 
Station S-5A Time Series Comparisony = 0.984x + 0.2632R2 = 0.9981101214161820101214161820Time Series 320 Tail Water Level (ft)
Time Series 6677 Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.10 Station S-5A tail water level time series comparison. 

96 
Station S-5A Time Series Comparisony = 1.0001x - 0.0022R2 = 1101214161820101214161820Time Series 320 Tail Water Level (ft)
Time Series TA384 Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.11 Station S-5A tail water level time series comparison. 
Station S-5ASTime Series3234681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.12 Station S-5AS Head Water Level 

97 
Station S-5ASTime Series 66924681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.13 Station S-5AS Head Water Level 
Station S-5AS 
Time Series PN4544681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.14 Station S-5AS Head Water Level 

98 
Station S-5AS Time Series Comparisony = 0.9889x + 0.1698R2 = 0.992481012141618208101214161820Time Series 6692 Head Water Level (ft)
Time Series 323 Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.15 Station S-5AS head water level time series comparison. 
Station S-5AS Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 181012141618208101214161820Time Series 323 Head Water Level (ft)
Time Series PN454 Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.16 Station S-5AS head water level time series comparison. 

99 
Station S-5ASTime Series 66934681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.17 Station S-5AS Tail Water Level 
Station G-300Time Series KN6274681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.18 Station G-300 Head Water Level 

100 
Station G-300Time Series KN6284681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.19 Station G-300 Tail Water Level 
Station G-301Time Series KS6854681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.20 Station G-301 Head Water Level 

Station G-301 
Time Series KS686 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 
Tail Water Level (ft) 
2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.21 Station G-301 Tail Water Level 
Station G-310 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 
Head Water Level (ft) 
Time Series M5154 
2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.22 Station G-310 Head Water Level 

Station G-310 
Time Series M5155 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 
Tail Water Level (ft) 
2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.23 Station G-310 Tail Water Level 
Station G-310 
Time Series PI326 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 
Tail Water Level (ft) 
2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.24 Station G-310 Tail Water Level 

103 
Station G-310 Time Series Comparisony = 0.9996x + 0.0261R2 = 0.9891515.415.816.216.61515.415.816.216.6Time Series M5155 Tail Water Level (ft)
Time Series PI326 Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.25 Station G-310 tail water level time series comparison. 
Station G-251Time Series 162184681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.26 Station G-251 Head Water Level 

104 
Station G-251Time Series 162194681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.27 Station G-251 Tail Water Level 
Station S-6Time Series 3564681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.28 Station S-6 Head Water Level 

105 
Station S-6Time Series 66844681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.29 Station S-6 Head Water Level 
Station S-6 Time Series Comparisony = 0.9783x + 0.0817R2 = 0.99087891011121378910111213Time Series 356 Head Water Level (ft)
Time Series 6684 Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.30 Station S-6 head water level time series comparison. 

106 
Station S-6Time Series 66854681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.31 Station S-6 Tail Water Level 
Station S-10ETime Series 162294681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.32 Station S-10E Head Water Level 

107 
Station S-10ETime Series P08544681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.33 Station S-10E Head Water Level 
Station S-10E Time Series Comparisony = x + 0.0004R2 = 1141516171819141516171819Time Series 16229 Head Water Level (ft)
Time Series P0845 Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.34 Station S-10E head water level time series comparison. 

108 
Station S-10ETime Series 162304681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.35 Station S-10E Tail Water Level 
Station G-338Time Series TA8634.006.008.0010.0012.0014.0016.0018.0020.001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.36 Station G-338 Head Water Level 

Station G-338 
Time Series TA865 
4.00 
6.00 
8.00 
10.00 
12.00 
14.00 
16.00 
18.00 
20.00 
1/1/95 
Tail Water Level (ft) 
2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.37 Station G-338 Tail Water Level 
Station S-10D 
Time Series 7912 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 2/5/96 
Head Water Level (ft) 
3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.38 Station S-10D Head Water Level (DWR) 

Station S-10D 
Time Series USGS-S10D-U 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.39 Station S-10D Head Water Level 
Station S-10D 
Time Series 7621 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 2/5/96 9/1/02 
Tail Water Level (ft) 
3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.40 Station S-10D Tail Water Level (DWR) 

Station S-10D 
Time SeriesUSGS-S10D-D 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 2/5/96 9/1/02 
Tail Water Level (ft) 
3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.41 Station S-10D Tail Water Level 
Station S-10C 
Time Series 7910 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 2/5/96 
Head Water Level (ft) 
3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.42 Station S-10C Head Water Level (DWR) 

112 
Station S-10CTime Series G50704681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.43 Station S-10C Head Water Level 
Station S-10CTime Series USGS-S10C-U 
4.006.008.0010.0012.0014.0016.0018.0020.001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.44 Station S-10C Head Water Level 

113 
Station S-10C Time Series Comparisony = 1.0038x - 0.0924R2 = 0.998611121314151617181112131415161718Time Series USGS-S10C-U Head Water Level (ft)
Time Series G5070 Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.45 Station S-10C head water level time series comparison. 
Station S-10CTime Series 79114681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.46 Station S-10C Tail Water Level (DWR) 

114 
Station S-10CTime Series G50714681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.47 Station S-10C Tail Water Level 
Station S-10CTime Series USGS-S10C-D 
4681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.48 Station S-10C Tail Water Level 

115 
Station S-10C Time Series Comparisony = 0.996x + 0.0588R2 = 0.998511121314151617181112131415161718Time Series USGS-S10C-D Tail Water Level (ft)
Time Series G5071 Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.49 Station S-10C tail water level time series comparison. 
Station S-10ATime Series 79084681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.50 Station S-10A Head Water Level (DWR) 

Station S-10A 
Time Series USGS-S10A-U 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 2/5/96 9/1/02 
Head Water Level (ft) 
3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.51 Station S-10A Head Water Level 
Station S-10A 
Time Series 7909 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 2/5/96 9/1/02 
Tail Water Level (ft) 
3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.52 Station S-10A Tail Water Level (DWR) 

117 
Station S-10CTime Series USGS-S10A-D 
4681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.53 Station S-10A Tail Water Level 
Station S-39Time Series 66604681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.54Station S-39 Head Water Level 

118 
Station S-39Time Series 66614681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.55 Station S-39 Tail Water Level 
Station S-39Time Series 43624681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft)
` 
Figure A2.56 Station S-39 Tail Water Level 

119 
Station ACME #1Time Series JO0904681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.57 Station ACME #1 Head Water Level 
Station ACME #1Time Series JO0914681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.58 Station ACME #1 Tail Water Level 

120 
Station ACME #2Time Series JO0924681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Head Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.59 Station ACME #2 (G-94B) Head Water Level 
Station ACME #2Time Series JO0934681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.60 Station ACME #2 (G-94B) Tail Water Level 

Station G-94C 
Time Series OR352 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 2/5/96 9/1/02 
Head Water Level (ft) 
3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.61 Station G-94C Head Water Level 
Station G-94C 
Time Series MG648 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 
Tail Water Level (ft) 
2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.62 Station G-94C Tail Water Level 

Station G-94C 
Time Series OR351 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
1/1/95 
Tail Water Level (ft) 
2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure A2.63 Station G-94C Tail Water Level 
Station G-94C Time Series Comparison 
Time Series OR351 Tail Water Level (ft) 
16.6 
16.4 
16.2 
16 
15.8 
15.6 
15.4 
15.2 
y = 0.7328x + 4.4459 
R2 = 0.3432 
15.2 15.4 15.6 15.8 16 16.2 16.4 16.6 
Time Series MG648 Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.64 Station G-94C tail water level time series comparison. 

123 
Station G-94BTime Series NI7454681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.65 Station G-94B Tail Water Level 
Station G-94ATime Series NI7444681012141618201/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Tail Water Level (ft) 
Figure A2.66 Station G-94A Tail Water Level 

124 
Appendix B 
(Flow through Structures and Pump Stations) 
Station S-5ATime Series 673905001000150020002500300035004000450050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.1 S-5A Flow 
Station S-5ATime Series TA38305001000150020002500300035004000450050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.2 S-5A Flow 

125 
StationTime Series JW226 (PREF)
05001000150020002500300035004000450050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.3 S-5A Flow 
Station S-5A Time Series Comparison 
y = x + 0.0027R2 = 10500100015002000250030003500400045005000010002000300040005000Time Series 6739 Flow (cfs)
Time Series TA383 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.4 S-5A flow time series comparison. 

126 
S-5A Time Series Comparisony = 0.9999x + 0.0168R2 = 10500100015002000250030003500400045005000010002000300040005000Time Series 6739 Flow (cfs)
Time Series JW226 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.5 S-5A flow time series comparison. 
Station S-5ASTime Series 12899-3000-2000-10000100020003000400050001/1/19952/5/19963/11/19974/15/19985/20/19996/23/20007/28/20019/1/200210/6/200311/9/2004FLow (cfs) 
Figure B.6 S-5AS Flow 

127 
Station S-5ASTime Series TA410-3000-2000-10000100020003000400050001/1/19952/5/19963/11/19974/15/19985/20/19996/23/20007/28/20019/1/200210/6/200311/9/2004Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.7 S-5AS Flow 
Station S5-ASTime Series T0951-3000-2000-10000100020003000400050001/1/19952/5/19963/11/19974/15/19985/20/19996/23/20007/28/20019/1/200210/6/200311/9/2004Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.8 S-5AS Flow 

128 
Station S-5ASTime Series 6758-3000-2000-10000100020003000400050001/1/19952/5/19963/11/19974/15/19985/20/19996/23/20007/28/20019/1/200210/6/200311/9/2004Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.9 S-5AS Flow 
Station S-5ASTime Series L7444-3000-2000-10000100020003000400050001/1/19952/5/19963/11/19974/15/19985/20/19996/23/20007/28/20019/1/200210/6/200311/9/2004Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.10 S-5AS Flow 

129 
Station S-5AS Time Series Comparisony = 0.9504x - 7.2918R2 = 0.7667-1500-1000-5000500100015002000-1500-1000-5000500100015002000Time Series 6758 Flow (cfs)
Time Series 12899 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.11 S-5AS flow time series comparison. 
Station S-5AS Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 1-1500-1000-5000500100015002000-1500-1000-5000500100015002000Time Series TA410 Flow (cfs)
Time Series L7444 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.12 S-5AS flow time series comparison. 

130 
Station G-300Time Series KD315-2000-10000100020003000400050001/1/19952/5/19963/11/19974/15/19985/20/19996/23/20007/28/20019/1/200210/6/200311/9/2004Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.13 G-300 Flow 
Station G-300Time Series TA411-2000-10000100020003000400050001/1/19952/5/19963/11/19974/15/19985/20/19996/23/20007/28/20019/1/200210/6/200311/9/2004Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.14 G-300 Flow 

131 
Station G-300 Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 1-1500-1000-50005001000150020002500-1500-1000-50005001000150020002500Time Series KD315 Flow (cfs)
Time Series TA411 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.15 G-300 flow time series comparison. 
Station G-301Time Series JJ809-2000-10000100020003000400050001/1/19952/5/19963/11/19974/15/19985/20/19996/23/20007/28/20019/1/200210/6/200311/9/2004Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.16 G-301 Flow 

132 
Station G-301Time Series TA412-2000-10000100020003000400050001/1/19952/5/19963/11/19974/15/19985/20/19996/23/20007/28/20019/1/200210/6/200311/9/2004Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.17 G-301 Flow 
Station G301 Time Series Comparison 
y = 0.5894x + 15.407R2 = 0.2568-1500-50050015002500-1500-50050015002500Time Series JJ809 Flow (cfs)
Time Series TA412 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.18 G-301 flow time series comparison. 

133 
Station G-301 Time Series Comparison-2000-1500-1000-500050010001500200025006/6/996/5/006/5/016/5/026/5/036/4/046/4/05Flow (cfs)
JJ809TA412 
Figure B.19 G-301 flow time series comparison. 
Station G-310Time Series LQ9770100020003000400050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.20 G-310 Flow 

134 
Station G-310Time Series PK9190100020003000400050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.21 G-310 Flow 
Station G-310Time Series M29010100020003000400050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.22 G-310 Flow 

135 
Station G-310 Time Series Comparisony = x - 0.1136R2 = 0.9999050010001500200025003000050010001500200025003000Time Series LQ977 Flow (cfs)
Time Series M2901 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.23 G-310 flow time series comparison. 
Station G-310 Time Series Comparisony = 0.9958x + 0.0013R2 = 0.996605001000150020002500300035000500100015002000250030003500Time Series M2901 Flow (cfs)
Time Series PK919 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.24 G-310 flow time series comparison. 

136 
Station G-251Time Series 15848010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.25 G-251 Flow 
Station G-251Time Series P1047010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.26 G-251 Flow 

137 
Station G-251Time Series JW222010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.27 G-251 Flow 
Station G-251 Time Series Comparisony = x - 3E-05R2 = 101002003004005000100200300400500Time Series 15848 Flow (cfs)
Time Series JW222 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.28 G-251 flow time series comparison. 

138 
Station G-251 Time Series Comparisony = x + 1E-05R2 = 101002003004005000100200300400500Time Series 15848 Flow (cfs)
Time Series P1047 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.29 G-251 flow time series comparison. 
Station S-6Time Series 67410100020003000400050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.30 S-6 Flow 

139 
Station S-6Time Series 150340100020003000400050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.31 S-6 Flow 
Station S-6Time Series P10190100020003000400050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.32 S-6 Flow 

140 
Station S-6Time Series 3570100020003000400050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.33 S-6 Flow 
Station S-6 Time Series Comparisony = 0.9918x + 0.3713R2 = 0.9981050010001500200025003000050010001500200025003000Time Series 6741 Flow (cfs)
Time Series 15034 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.34 S-6 flow time series comparison. 

141 
Station S-6 Flow Comparisony = 1.0057x + 14.058R2 = 0.941050010001500200025003000350040004500050010001500200025003000350040004500Time Series P1019 Flow (cfs)
Time Series 15034 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.35 S-6 flow time series comparison. 
Station S-10ETime Series 16228-100010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.36 S-10E Flow 

Station S-6
Time Series K5484 
-100 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1000 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.37 S-10E Flow 
Station S-6 
Time Series P1066 
-100 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1000 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.38 S-10E Flow 

143 
Station S-10E Time Series Comparisony = 0.9959x + 0.3516R2 = 0.9975-200-1000100200300400500600-2000200400600Time Series 16228 Flow (cfs)
Time Series K5484 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.39 S-10E flow time series comparison. 
Station S-10E Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 101002003004005006000100200300400500600Time Series P1066 Flow (cfs)
Time Series K5484 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.40 S-10E flow time series comparison. 

144 
Station S-10DTime Series 152630100020003000400050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.41 S-10D Flow 
Station S-10DTime Series TA4210100020003000400050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.42 S-10D Flow 

145 
Station S-10D Time Series Comparisony = x - 0.0004R2 = 1050010001500200025003000050010001500200025003000Time Series 15263 Flow (cfs)
Time Series TA421 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.43 S-10D flow time series comparison. 
Station S-10CTime Series 152620100020003000400050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.44 S-10C Flow 

146 
Station S-10CTime Series TA4200100020003000400050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.45 S-10C Flow 
Station S-10C Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 105001000150020002500300035000500100015002000250030003500Time Series 15262 Flow (cfs)
Time Series TA420 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.46 S-10C flow time series comparison. 

147 
Station S-10ATime Series 1526105001000150020002500300035004000450050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.47 S-10A Flow 
Station S-10ATime Series TA4190100020003000400050001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.48 S-10A Flow 

148 
Station S-10A Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 1010002000300040005000010002000300040005000Time Series 15261 Flow (cfs)
Time Series TA419 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.49 S-10A flow time series comparison. 
Station S-39Time Series 6733010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.50 S-39 Flow 

149 
Station S-39Time Series K5489010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.51 S-39 Flow 
Station S-39Time Series P1012010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.52 S-39 Flow 

150 
Station S-39 Time Series Comparison 
y = x - 0.0005R2 = 10200400600800100002004006008001000Time Series 6733 Flow (cfs)
Time Series K5489 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.53 S-39 flow time series comparison. 
Station S-39 Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 10200400600800100002004006008001000Time Series K5489 Flow (cfs)
Time Series P1012 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.54 S-39 flow time series comparison. 

Station S-362 
Time Series SFWMD-S362 + T0897 
0 
1000 
2000 
3000 
4000 
5000 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.55 S-362 Flow 
Station ACME #1 
Time Series 15022 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1000 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.56 ACME #1 Flow 

152 
Station ACME #1Time Series PI317010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.57 ACME #1 Flow 
Station ACME #1Time Series OH647010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.58 ACME #1 Flow 

153 
Station ACME #1Time Series JO088010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.59 ACME #1 Flow 
Station ACME #1 Time Series Comparison 
050100150200250300350400050100150200250300350400Time Series 15022 Flow (cfs)
Time Series OH647 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.60 ACME #1 flow time series comparison. 

154 
Station ACME #1 Time Series Comparisony = x + 4E-06R2 = 1050100150200250050100150200250Time Series OH647 Flow (cfs)
Time Series JO088 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.61 ACME #1 flow time series comparison. 
Station ACME #1 Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 10501001502002503003504000100200300400Time Series OH647 Flow (cfs)Time Series PI317 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.62 ACME #1 flow time series comparison. 

155 
Station ACME #2Time Series 15023010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.63 ACME #2 (G-94D) Flow 
Station ACME #2Time Series OH648010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.64 ACME #2 (G-94D) Flow 

156 
Station ACME #2Time Series JO089010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.65 ACME #2 (G-94D) Flow 
Station ACME #2Time Series PI318010020030040050060070080090010001/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.66 ACME #2 (G-94D) Flow 

157 
Station ACME #2 Time Series Comparisony = 0.8795x + 0.9323R2 = 0.9230100200300400050100150200250300350400Time Series 15023 Flow (cfs)
Time Series OH648 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.67 ACME #2(G-94D) flow time series comparison. 
Station ACME #2 Time Series Comparisony = 0.9986x - 0.006R2 = 0.9988050100150200250050100150200250Time Series OH648 Flow (cfs)
Time Series JO089 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.68 ACME #2(G-94D) flow time series comparison. 

158 
Station ACME #2 Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 101002003004000100200300400Time Sereis OH648 Flow (cfs)
Time Series PI318 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.69 ACME #2(G-94D) flow time series comparison. 
Station G-94CTime Series MW385-300-200-100010020030040050060070080090010001/1/19952/5/19963/11/19974/15/19985/20/19996/23/20007/28/20019/1/200210/6/200311/9/2004Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.70 G-94C Flow 

Station G-94C 
Time Series OR446 
-300 
-200 
-100 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1000 
1/1/1995 
2/5/1996 
9/1/2002 
Flow (cfs) 
3/11/1997 
4/15/1998 
5/20/1999 
6/23/2000 
7/28/2001 
10/6/2003 
11/9/2004 
Figure B.71 G-94C Flow 
Station G-94C 
Time Series TA424 
-300 
-200 
-100 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1000 
1/1/1995 
2/5/1996 
9/1/2002 
Flow (cfs) 
3/11/1997 
4/15/1998 
5/20/1999 
6/23/2000 
7/28/2001 
10/6/2003 
11/9/2004 
Figure B.72 G-94C Flow 

160 
Station G-94C Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 1050100150200250050100150200250Time Sereis OR446 Flow (cfs)
Time Series TA424 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.73 G-94C flow time series comparison. 
Station G-94C Time Series Comparisony = 0.6214x + 37.83R2 = 0.1227050100150200250050100150200250Time Sereis MW385 Flow (cfs)
Time Series TA424 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.74 G-94C flow time series comparison. 

Station G-94B 
Time Series NI750 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1000 
Flow (cfs) 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure B.75 G-94B Flow 
Station G-94B 
Time Series SX615 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1000 
Flow (cfs) 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure B.76 G-94B Flow 

Station G-94B 
Time Series TA423 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1000 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Flow (cfs) 
y = x 
= 1 
100 
150 
200 
250 
Time Series TA423 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.77 G-94B Flow 
Station G-94B Time Series Comparison 
R2
50 
0 
0 50 100 150 200 250
Time Sereis SX615 Flow (cfs)
Figure B.78 G-94B flow time series comparison. 
162 

Station G-94B Time Series Comparison 
250 
Time Series TA423 Flow (cfs)
200 
150 
100 
50 
0 
0 50 100 150 200 250 
Time Sereis NI750 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.79 G-94B flow time series comparison. 
y = 1.0206x - 0.3333 
R2 = 0.9922 
Station G-94A 
Time Series NI751 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1000 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.80 G-94A Flow 

Station G-94A 
Time Series SX614 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1000 
Flow (cfs) 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure B.81 G-94A Flow 
Station G-94A 
Time Series TA422 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1000 
Flow (cfs) 
1/1/95 2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure B.82 G-94A Flow 

165 
Station G-94A Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 1050100150200050100150200Time Sereis SX614 Flow (cfs)
Time Series TA422 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.83 G-94A flow time series comparison. 
Station G-94A Time Series Comparisony = 0.9982x - 0.0003R2 = 1010203040010203040Time Sereis NI751 Flow (cfs)
Time Series TA422 Flow (cfs) 
Figure B.84 G-94A flow time series comparison. 

166 
Appendix C 
(Rainfall Measurements) 
LOXWS RainfallTime Series DU551012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.1 LOXWS Rain Measurements 
STA1W RainfallTime Series J5744012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.2 STA1W Rain Measurements 

167 
WCA1ME RainfallTime Series DU517012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.3 WCA1ME Rain Measurements 
S-39 Rainfall 
Time Series 6035012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Raiinfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.4 S-39 Rain Measurements 

168 
Station S-39Time Series K8674012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.5 S-39 Rain Measurements 
Station S-39Time Series 16677012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.6 S-39 Rain Measurements 

169 
Station S-39 Time Series Comparison01234567890123456789Time Series 6035 Rainfall (inch/day)
Time Series 16677 Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.7 S-39 rainfall time series comparison (daily) 
Station S-39 Time Series Copmarison01234567890123456789Time Series 16677 Rainfall (inch/day)
Time Series K8674 Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.8 S-39 rainfall time series comparison (daily). 

170 
Station S-39 Time Series Comparisony = 0.8628x + 0.0236R2 = 0.707901234567890123456789Time Series 6035 Rainfall (inch/day)
Time Series K8674 Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.9 S-39 rainfall time comparison (daily). 
Station S-39 Time Series Comparisony = 0.7494x + 1.6468R2 = 0.410246810121416182002468101214161820Time Series 6035 Rainfall (inch/month)
Time Series 16677 Rainfall (inch/month) 
Figure C.10 S-39 rainfall time comparison (monthly). 

Station S-39 Time Series Comparison 
20 
18 
16
Time Series K8674 Rainfall (inch/month)
14 
12 
10 
8 
6 
4 
2 
0 
y = 0.9183x + 0.2247 
R2 = 0.9459 
0 2 4 6 8 101214161820 
Time Series 16677 Rainfall (inch/month) 
Figure C.11 S-39 rainfall time comparison (monthly). 
Station S-39 Time Series Comparison 
Time Series K8674 Rainfall (inch/month)
18 
16 
14 
12 
10 
8 
6 
4 
2 
0 
y = 0.8516x + 0.8452 
R2 = 0.6807 
0 2 4 6 8 1012141618 
Time Series 6035 Rainfall (inch/month) 
Figure C.12 S-39 rainfall time comparison (monthly). 

172 
S-5A RaiinfallTime Sereis 6274012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.13 S-5A Rain Measurements 
Station S-5ATime Sereis 15202 (PREF)
012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.14 S-5A Rain Measurements 

173 
S-5A RainfallTime Series 16176012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.15 S-5A Rain Measurements 
S-5A RainfallTime Series 16645012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.16 S-5A Rain Measurements 

174 
Station S-5A Time Series Comparisony = 0.9539x + 0.0088R2 = 0.9104012345678012345678Time Series 15202 Rainfall (inch/day)
Time Series 16176 Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.17 S-5A rainfall time series comparison (daily). 
Station S-5A Time Series Comparison01234560123456Time Series 15202 Rainfall (inch/day)
Time Series 16645 Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.18 S-5A rainfall time series comparison (daily). 

175 
. 
Station S-5A Time Series Comparison01234560123456Time Series 15202 Rainfall (inch/day)
Time Series 5895 Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.19 S-5A rainfall time series comparison (daily). 
. 
Station S-5A Time Series Comparisony = 1.0505x - 0.2686R2 = 0.898702468101214161820222426280246810121416182022242628Time Series 15202 Rainfall (inch/month)
Time Series 16176 Rainfall (inch/month) 
Figure C.20 S-5A rainfall time series comparison (monthly). 

176 
Station S-5A Time Series Comparisony = 0.9358x + 0.1789R2 = 0.9329024681012141618024681012141618Time Series 15202 Rainfall (inch/month)
Time Series 16645 Rainfall (inch/month) 
Figure C.21 S-5A rainfall time series comparison (monthly). 
S-6 RainfallTime Series 15203 (PREF)
012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.22 S-6 Rain Measurements 

177 
S-6 RainfallTime Series 16202012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.23 S-6 Rain Measurements 
S-6 RainfallTime Series 16651012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.24 S-6 Rain Measurements 

178 
S-6 Rainfall 
Time Series K8685012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.25 S-6 Rain Measurements 
Station S-6 Time Series Comparisony = 0.9408x + 0.0091R2 = 0.88810123456701234567Time Series 15203 Rainfall (inch/day)
Time Series 16202 Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.26 S-6 rainfall time series comparison (daily). 

179 
Station S-6 Time Series Comparison012345601234567Time Series 15203 Rainfall (inch/day)
Time Series 16651 Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.27 S-6 rainfall time series comparison (daily). 
Station S-6 Time Series Comparisony = 0.834x + 0.0201R2 = 0.76740123456701234567Time Series 15203 Rainfall (inch/day)
Time Series K8685 Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.28 S-6 rainfall time series comparison (daily) 

Station S-6 Time Series Comparison 
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Time Series 16202 Rainfall (inch/month) 
0 2 4 6 8 1012141618 
Time Series 15203 Rainfall (inch/month) 
Figure C.29 S-6 rainfall time series comparison (monthly) 
Station S-6 Time Series Comparison 
y = 0.8447x + 0.4547 
R2 = 0.8113 
Time Series 16651 Rainfall (inch/month) 
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0 2 4 6 8 1012141618
Time Series 15203 Rainfall (inch/month)
Figure C.30 S-6 rainfall time series comparison (monthly) 
y = 0.988x + 0.1048 
R2 = 0.9643 

181 
Station S-6 Time Series Comparisony = 0.8943x + 0.1253R2 = 0.8805024681012141618024681012141618Time Series 15203 Rainfall (inch/month)
Time Series K8685 Rainfall (inch/month) 
Figure C.31 S-6 rainfall time series comparison (monthly) 
Shop (Basin A) Rainfall012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.32 Shop (Basin A) Rain Measurements 

182 
Water Plant (Basin A) Rainfall012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.33 Water Plant (Basin A) Rain Measurements 
PS-3 (Basin A) Rainfall012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.34 PS-3 (Basin A) Rain Measurements 

183 
PS-4 (Basin A) Rainfall012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.35 PS-4 (Basin A) Rain Measurements 
PS-5 Lift Sta. (Basin A) Rainfall012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.36 PS-5 (Basin A) Rain Measurements 

184 
Sth. Shore Sth. End (Basin B) Rainfall012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.37 Sth. Shore Sth End (Basin B) Rain Measurements 
Wells @ Home Land (Basin B) Rainfall012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.38 Wells @ Home Land (Basin B) Rain Measurements 

185 
PS-1 (Basin B) Rainfall012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.39 PS-1 (Basin B) Rain Measurements 
Sewer Plant (Basin B) Rainfall012345678910111/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Rainfall (inch/day) 
Figure C.40 Sewer Plant (Basin B) Rain Measurements 

Appendix D 
(Evaporation and Evapotranspiration Measurements) 
Time Series 6331 
0 
0.1 
0.2 
0.3 
0.4 
0.5 
0.6 
0.7 
0.8 
0.9 
1 
1/1/95 
Pan Evaporation (inch) 
S-5A Evaporation 
2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure D.1 S-5A Pan Evaporation 
Time Series PN932 
0 
0.1 
0.2 
0.3 
0.4 
0.5 
0.6 
0.7 
0.8 
0.9 
1 
1/1/95 Pan Evaporation (inch) 
S-5A Evaporation 
2/5/96 3/11/97 4/15/98 5/20/99 6/23/00 7/28/01 9/1/02 10/6/03 11/9/04 
Figure D.2 S-5A Pan Evaporation 

187 
Station S-5A Time Series Comparisony = xR2 = 100.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.800.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.8Time Series 6331 Pan Evaporation (inch)
Time Series PN932 Pan Evaporation (inch) 
Figure D.3 S-5A Pan evaporation time series comparison. 
STA1W EvapotranspirationTime Series JD470 & KN810 
00.050.10.150.20.250.31/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Evapotranspiration (inch) 
Figure D.4 S-5A Evapotranspiration 

188 
LOXWS Potential Evapotranspiration 
Time Series RW48500.050.10.150.20.250.31/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Potential Evapotranspiration (mm) 
Figure D.5 LOXWS Potential Evapotranspiration 
Comparison between ETand Potential ET00.050.10.150.20.250.300.050.10.150.20.250.3STA1W ET (inch)
LOXWS Potential ET (inch) 
Figure D.6 Comparison between ET measurement from STA1W and Potential ET from 
LOXWS. 

189 
Appendix E 
(Wind Speed) 
ENR308 Wind Speed 
05101520253035401/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Wind (mi/hr) 
Figure E1. ENR 308 Wind Speed 
LOXWS Wind Speed05101520253035401/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Wind Speed (mi/hr) 
Figure E2. LOXWS Wind Speed 

190 
S-5A Wind Speed 
05101520253035401/1/951/1/961/1/971/1/981/1/991/1/001/1/011/1/021/1/031/1/041/1/05Wind Speed (mi/hr) 
Figure E3. S-5A Wind Speed 
West Palm Beach International Airport (PBI) – Wind Speed05101520253035401/1/951/1/961/1/971/1/981/1/991/1/001/1/011/1/021/1/031/1/041/1/05Wind Speed (mi/hr) 
Figure E4. West Palm Beach International Airport (PBI) – Wind Speed 

191 
Wind Direction - West Palm Beach International Airport (PBI)
040801201602002402803203601/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Wind Direction (degrees) 
Figure E5. West Palm Beach International Airport (PBI) – Wind Direction 
USGS Site 1 Wind Speed05101520253035401/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Wind (mi/hr) 
Figure E6. USGS-1 Wind Speed 

192 
USGS Site 1 Wind Direction 
040801201602002402803203601/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Wind Direction (degrees) 
Figure E7. USGS-1 Wind Direction 
USGS Site 3 Wind Speed05101520253035401/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Wind (mi/hr) 
Figure E8. USGS-3 Wind Speed 

193 
USGS Site 3 Wind Direction040801201602002402803203601/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Wind Direction (degrees) 
Figure E9. USGS-3 Wind Direction 
USGS Site 4 Wind Speed05101520253035401/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Wind (mi/hr) 
Figure E10. USGS-4 Wind Speed 

194 
USGS Site 4 Wind Direction040801201602002402803203601/1/952/5/963/11/974/15/985/20/996/23/007/28/019/1/0210/6/0311/9/04Wind Direction (degrees) 
Figure E11. USGS-4 Wind Direction 

APPENDIX F
(Water Quality Parameters)
APPENDIX F1
TP Time Series -Station LOX3 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F1.1 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX3 
TP Time Series - Station LOX4 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F1.2 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX4 

TP Time Series - Station LOX5 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/199 12/11/199 11/30/200 11/20/200 11/9/2004 
6802 
Figure F1.3 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX5 
TPTime Series - Station LOX6 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F1.4 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX6 

TP Time Series - Station LOX7 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F1.5 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX7 
TP Time Series - Station LOX8 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F1.6 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX8 

TP Time Series - Station LOX9 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F1.7 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX9 
TP Time Series - Station LOX10 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F1.8 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX10 

TP Time Series - Station LOX11 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F1.9 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX11 
TP Time Series - Station LOX12 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F1.10 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX12 

TP Time Series - Station LOX13 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F1.11 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX13 
TPTime Series - Station LOX14 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F1.12 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX14 

TP Time Series - Station LOX15 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F1.13 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX15 
TP Time Series - Station LOX16 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F1.14 TP Time Series – EVPA Station LOX16 

APPENDIX F2
TP Time Series - Statio X0 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F2.1 TP Time Series – Station X0 
TP Time Series - Station X1 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F2.2 TP Time Series – Station X1 

TP Time Series - Station X2 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
TP ( m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F2.3 TP Time Series – Station X2 
TP Time Series - Station X3 
TP (m g/L) 
300 
250 
200 
150 
100 
50 
0 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F2.4 TP Time Series – Station X3 

TP Time Series - Station X4 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F2.5 TP Time Series – Station X4 
TP Time Series - Station Y4 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F2.6 TP Time Series – Station Y4 

TP Time Series - Station Z0 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F2.7 TP Time Series – Station Z0 
TP Time Series - Station Z1 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F2.8 TP Time Series – Station Z1 

TP Time Series - Station Z2 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F2.9 TP Time Series – Station Z2 
TP Time Series - Station Z3 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F2.10 TP Time Series – Station Z3 

TP Time Series - Station Z4 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F2.11 TP Time Series – Station Z4 

APPENDIX F3
TP Time Series - S-5A Station 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1/1/1995 
TP (m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F3.1.A TP Time Series – Station S-5A (Grab Samples) 
TP Time Series - S-5A Station 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1/1/1995 TP (m g/L) 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F3.1.B TP Time Series – Station S-5A (Composite Samples) 

TP Time Series - Station S-5AS 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F3.2 TP Time Series – Station S-5AS 
TP Time Series - Station G300 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F3.3 TP Time Series – Station G-300 

TP Time Series - Station G - 301 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F3.4 TP Time Series – Station G-301
TP Time Series - Station G -310 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
1/1/1995 
TP (m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F3.5.A TP Time Series – Station G-310 (Grab Samples) 

TP Time Series - Station G -310 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
1/1/1995 
TP (m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F3.5.B TP Time Series – Station G-310 (Composite Samples) 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
TP Time Series - Station S-6 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F3.6.A TP Time Series – Station S-6 (Grab Samples) 

0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
TP Time Series - Station S-6 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F3.6.B TP Time Series – Station S-6 (Composite Samples) 
TP Time Series - Station S-10E 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F3.7 TP Time Series – Station S-10E 

TP Time Series - Station S-10D 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F3.8 TP Time Series – Station S-10D 
TP Time Series - Station S-10C 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F3.9 TP Time Series – Station S-10C 

TP time Series - Station S-10A 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F3.10 TP Time Series – Station S-10A 
TP Time Series - Station S-39
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F3.11 TP Time Series – Station S-39

TP Time Series - Station ACME-1 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F3.12 TP Time Series – Station ACME 1
TP Time Series - Station ACME - 2 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F3.13 TP Time Series – Station G-94D (ACME 2) 

TP Time Series - Station G-94B 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F3.14 TP Time Series – Station G-94B 

APPENDIX F4
TP Time Series - Station S5AD 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900 
11/9/2004 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F4.1 TP Time Series – Station S5AD 
TP Time Series - Station S6D 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F4.2 TP Time Series – Station S6D 

TP Time Series - Station L40-1
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F4.3 TP Time Series – Station L40-1 
TP Time Series - Station L40-2 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F4.4 TP Time Series – Station L40-2 

TP Time Series - Station ACME1DS 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
TP (m g/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F4.5 TP Time Series – Station ACME1DS 

APPENDIX F5
Cl Time Series - Station LOX3 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
11/9/2004 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F5.1 Cl Time Series – Station LOX3 
Cl Time Series - Station LOX4 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004
Figure F5.2 Cl Time Series – Station LOX4 

Cl Time Series - Station LOX5 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F5.3 Cl Time Series – Station LOX5 
Cl Time Series - Station LOX6 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004
Figure F5.4 Cl Time Series – Station LOX6 

Cl Time Series - Station LOX7 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F5.5 Cl Time Series – Station LOX7 
Cl Time Series - Station LOX8 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004
Figure F5.6 Cl Time Series – Station LOX8 

Cl Time Series - Station LOX9 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F5.7 Cl Time Series – Station LOX9 
Cl Time Series - Station LOX10 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F5.8 Cl Time Series – Station LOX10 

Cl Time Series -Station LOX11 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F5.9 Cl Time Series – Station LOX11 
Cl Time Series - Station LOX12 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Time Period 
Figure F5.10 Cl Time Series – Station LOX12 

Cl Time Series - Station LOX13 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F5.11 Cl Time Series – Station LOX13 
Cl Time Series - Station LOX14 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F5.12 Cl Time Series – Station LOX14 

Cl Time Series - Station LOX15 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
1/1/1995 
Cl (mg/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F5.13 Cl Time Series – Station LOX15 
Cl Time Series - Station LOX16 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
120 
140 
160 
180 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/95 12/21/96 12/11/98 11/30/00 11/20/02 11/9/04 
Time Period 
Figure F5.14 Cl Time Series – Station LOX16 

APPENDIX F6 
Cl Time Series - Station X0 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F6.1 Cl Time Series – Station X0 
Cl Time Series - Station X1 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F6.2 Cl Time Series – Station X1 

Cl Time Series - Station X2 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F6.3 Cl Time Series – Station X2 
Cl Time Series - Station X3 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F6.4 Cl Time Series – Station X3 

Cl Time Series - Station X4 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F6.5 Cl Time Series – Station X4 
Cl Time Series - Station Y4 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F6.6 Cl Time Series – Station Y4 

Cl Time Series - Station Z0 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F6.7 Cl Time Series – Station Z0 
Cl Time Series - Station Z1 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F6.8 Cl Time Series – Station Z1 

Cl Time Series - Station Z2 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F6.9 Cl Time Series – Station Z2 
Cl Time Series - Station Z3 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F6.10 Cl Time Series – Station Z3 

Cl Time Series - Station Z4 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F6.11 Cl Time Series – Station Z4 

APPENDIX F7
Cl Time Series - S-5A Station 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 
Figure F7.1 Cl Time Series – Station S-5A 
Cl Time Series - Station S-5AS 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F7.2 Cl Time Series – Station S-5AS 

Cl Time Series - Station G -310 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F7.3 Cl Time Series – Station G-310
Cl Time Series - Station S-6
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F7.4 Cl Time Series – Station S-6

Cl Time Series - Station S-10E 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F7.5 Cl Time Series – Station S-10E 
Cl Time Series - Station S-10D 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004
Figure F7.6 Cl Time Series – Station S-10D 

Cl Time Series - Station S-10C 
0 
100 
200 
300 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F7.7 Cl Time Series – Station S-10C 
Cl time Series - Station S-10A 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F7.8 Cl Time Series – Station S-10A 

Cl Time Series - Station S-39 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
Cl (mg/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F7.9 Cl Time Series – Station S-39 
Cl Time Series - Station ACME-1
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F 7.10 Cl Time Series – Station ACME 1
Cl Time Series - Station ACME - 2 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F7.11 Cl Time Series – Station G-94D (ACME 2) 
Cl Time Series - Station G-94B 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F7.12 Cl Time Series – Station G-94B 

APPENDIX F8
Cl Time Series - Station S5AD 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F8.1 Cl Time Series – Station S5AD 
Cl Time Series - Station S6D 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F8.2 Cl Time Series – Station S6D 

Cl Time Series - Station L40-1 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F8.3 Cl Time Series – Station L40-1 
Cl Time Series - Station L40-2 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
1/1/1995 11/9/2004 
Cl (mg/L) 
12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 
Figure F8.4 Cl Time Series – Station L40-2 

Cl Time Series - Station ACME1DS 
0 
50 
100 
150 
200 
250 
300 
350 
400 
Cl (mg/L) 
1/1/1995 12/21/1996 12/11/1998 11/30/2000 11/20/2002 11/9/2004 
Figure F8.5 Cl Time Series – Station ACME1DS 

Appendix G. Monthly Missing Data 
Appendix G.1 Interior Station Water Level Data 
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
Station 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
1-7
1-8T
1-8C
1-9
North 
South
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Station 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D
1-7
1-8T
3
1
1
1
1
1-8C
26
31
30
1
1-9
North 
3
2
12
1
1
3
1
1
South
7
2
12
1
1
2
1
1
Complete data are available for this month.
The station was in operation during this month but there are some missing data. The number inside the box indicates the total days of missing data for this month
The station was not in operation during this period
1 

Appendix G.2 Head and Tail Water Level Data 
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 
HW 
TW 
HW 
TW 
HW 6 30 31 1 
TW 6 30 31 1 
HW 
TW 
HW 
TW 
HW 
TW 
HW 
TW 
HW 
TW 1 
HW 
TW 
HW 6 1 4 2 1 4 
TW 7 1 6 7 6 4 5 4 2 2 1 4 1 
HW 1 9 2 2 
TW 3 3 7 1 5 2 1 
HW 1 2 1 10 2 1 1 1 2 
TW 11 3 2 1 18 7 4 2 3 1 3 3 
HW 
TW 1 
HW 
TW 
HW 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 8 
TW 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 8 
HW 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 7 
TW 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 7 
HW 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 
TW 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 
HW 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 
TW 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 
HW 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 
TW 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 
1997 1998 1999 
S-5A 
Station 
Data 
Type 
1995 1996 
S-5AS 
G-300 
G-301 
G-310 
G-251 
S-6 
S-10E 
S-10D 
G-338 
S-10C 
S-10A 
S-39 
ACME#1 
S-362 
G-94D 
G-94C 
G-94B 
G-94A 
20 
Water level data are available and complete for this month 
Structure was not in operation during this month 
Structure was in operation during this month but there are some missing data. The number inside the box indicates the total days of missing data for this month 

Cont. Appendix G.2 Head and Tail Water Level Data 
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 
HW 
TW 
HW 31 30 31 
TW 
HW 
TW 
HW 4 
TW 
HW 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 
TW 
HW 14 
TW 10 
HW 
TW 
HW ` 
TW 
HW 
TW 19 
HW 5 3 16 1 6 3 1 4 1 
TW 5 14 1 6 3 3 1 7 1 6 9 
HW 
TW 
HW 1 1 1 6 3 1 5 4 5 5 1 4 1 
TW 1 6 3 1 2 12 12 1 7 1 1 1 
HW 10 11 
TW 
HW 10 13 
TW 10 13 
HW 2 8 
TW 2 6 
HW 9 
TW 9 
HW 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 2 7 
TW 17 1 6 10 7 
HW 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 
TW 17 3 3 10 12 12 
HW 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 
TW 17 10 12 6 12 
2002 2003 2004 
S-5A 
Station 
Data 
Type 
2000 2001 
S-5AS 
G-300 
G-301 
G-310 
G-251 
S-6 
S-10E 
S-10D 
G-338 
S-10C 
S-10A 
S-39 
ACME#1 
S-362 
G-94D 
G-94C 
G-94B 
G-94A 
20 
Water level data are available and complete for this month 
Structure was not in operation during this month 
Structure was in operation during this month but there are some missing data. The number inside the box indicates the total days of missing data for this month 

Appendix G.3 Flow Data 
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 
S-5A 
S-5AS 
G-300 6 30 31 1 
G-301 
G-310 
G-251 
S-6 
S-10E 
G-338 
S-10D 
S-10C 
S-10A 
S-39 
S-362 
ACME#1 
G-94D 
G-94C 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 
G-94B 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 
G-94A 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 29 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 
S-5A 
S-5AS 
G-300 
G-301 
G-310 
G-251 
S-6 
S-10E 
G-338 
S-10D 
S-10C 
S-10A 
S-39 
S-362 8 6 1 
ACME#1 
G-94D 
G-94C 31 29 31 14 
G-94B 31 29 31 14 
G-94A 31 29 31 14 
Flow data are available and complete for this month 
Structure was not in operation during this month 
20 Structure was in operation during this month but there are some missing data. The number inside the box indicates the total days of missing data for this month 
1998 1999Station 
1995 1996 1997 
20042000 2001 2002 2003 

Appendix G.4 Rainfall Data 
1995 
1996 
1997 
1998 
1999
Station 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
S-5A 
S-6 
S-39 
STA1W 
WCA1ME 
11 
6 
31 
5 
4 
31 
2 
28 
31 
30 
11 
8 
30 
31 
31 
28 
31 
30 
31 
30 
31 
31 
30 
17 
LOXWS 
1 
13 
21 
31 
30 
3 
26 
3 
17 
2 
Gage1 
Gage2 
Gage3 
Gage4 
Gage5 
Gage6 
Gage7 
Gage8 
Gage9 
Gage10 
2000 
2001 
2002 
2003 
2004
Station 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
S-5A 
S-6 
S-39 
5 
7 
7 
3 
4 
4 
2 
STA1W 
WCA1ME 
1 
20 
18 
1 
21 
7 
28 
7 
1 
LOXWS 
6 
25 
31 
4 
1 
2 
Gage1 
Gage2 
Gage3 
Gage4 
Gage5 
Gage6 
Gage7 
Gage8 
Gage9 
Gage10 
1 
Complete data are available for this month.
The gage was in operation during this month but there are some missing data. The number inside the box indicates the total days of missing data for this month
Data are not available for this period

Appendix G.5 Evaporation and ET Data 
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 
Pan Evaporation 
S5A 16 5 2 15 14 15 16 16 15 9 9 13 14 13 14 14 20 27 19 12 21 22 20 16 20 12 12 14 15 16 5 18 10 9 18 12 15 15 12 10 18 7 14 16 9 11 21 15 16 13 13 6 15 15 9 9 10 11 15 4 
Evapotranspiration 
STA1W 
Potential Evapotranspiration 
LOXWS 4 17 20 17 3 12 19 25 25 16 25 14 17 3 18 31 31 26 1 15 22 31 30 4 27 4 18 3 
1998Station 19991995 1996 1997 
2000 
2001 
2002 
2003 
2004
Station 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
Pan Evaporation 
S5A 
8 
29 
11 
19 
4 
13 
11 
10 
11 
13 
15 
18 
17 
15 
11 
16 
12 
13 
14 
11 
21 
12 
13 
19 
15 
10 
12 
14 
10 
8 
8 
2 
1 
4 
11 
2 
4 
9 
12 
8 
13 
8 
11 
5 
8 
13 
14 
15 
7 
12 
13 
12 
11 
7 
9 
9 
22 
20 
21 
19 
Evapotranspiration 
STA1W 
Potential Evapotranspiration 
LOXWS 
7 
4 
3 
4 
4 
1 
1 
31 
15 
15 
6 
7 
6 
8 
5 
12 
25 
3 
26 
31 
6 
12 
6 
27 
5 
9 
1 
18 
6 
12 
2 
6 
5 
30 
31 
Complete data are available for this month.
The station was in operation during this month but there are some missing data. The number inside the box indicates the total days of missing data for this month
Appendix G.6 Air Temperature Data 
1995 
1996 
1997 
1998 
1999
Station 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
Air Temperature 
LOXWS 
5 
1 
13 
21 
31 
30 
3 
26 
3 
17 
2 
2000 
2001 
2002 
2003 
2004
Station 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
Air Temperature 
LOXWS 
21 
1 
6 
17 
8 
10 
25 
31 
4 
8 
12 
10 
11 
4 
1 
Complete data are available for this month.
The station was in operation during this month but there are some missing data. The number inside the box indicates the total days of missing data for this month

Appendix G.7 Wind Data 
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
Station 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
Wind Speed 
ENR308 
LOXWS 
1
13
3
21
31
30
3
26
3
17
2
S-5A
16
13
PBI
USGS-1
13
3
1
USGS-2
USGS-3
28
30
USGS-4
13
4
18
10
11
10
6
5
20
Wind Direction 
West Palm Beach International Airport (PBI) 
PBI 
1
1
1
USGS-1
12
3
USGS-2
USGS-3
USGS-4
13
4
18
10
11
10
6
5
20
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Station 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
J 
F 
M 
A 
M 
J 
J 
A 
S 
O 
N 
D 
Wind Speed 
ENR308 
1
5
LOXWS
6
1
25
31
4
8
5
2
5
4
12
S-5A
PBI
2
1
1
USGS-1
USGS-2
USGS-3
USGS-4
Wind Direction 
West Palm Beach International Airport (PBI) 
PBI 
2
2
USGS-1
USGS-2
USGS-3
USGS-4
1 
Complete data are available for this month.
The station was in operation during this month but there are some missing data. The number inside the box indicates the total days of missing data for this month
Data are not available for this period