skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 112115  
Title: Deterring Constitutional Violations by Law Enforcement Officials: Plaintiffs and Defendants as Private Attorneys General
Journal: Columbia Law Review  Volume:88  Issue:2  Dated:(March 1988)  Pages:247-328
Author(s): D J Meltzer
Publication Date: 1988
Pages: 82
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This article examines the provisions of deterrent remedies as a means of preventing misconduct by law enforcement officials in both defensive and offensive contexts.
Abstract: Defensive deterrent remedies are examined in two settings: the reversal of convictions because of discrimination in the selection of grand juries and the suppression of evidence under the exclusionary rule. The article argues that of the range of reasons for granting these remedies to criminal defendants, deterrence of future misconduct is the most persuasive. The article then considers whether deterrent remedies for constitutional violations by law enforcement personnel are an appropriate form of judicial lawmaking. The author argues that although suits for offensive deterrent remedies raise novel standing questions, there are persuasive reasons (drawn in part from analogies to the defensive context) to hold such suits to be justifiable. The article concludes with an examination of when it is appropriate to award offensive deterrent remedies, concluding that whether a deterrent remedy should be provided should be a context-specific question of remedial policy, whether the issue arises in a defensive or an offensive setting. 476 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Police legal limitations
Index Term(s): Discrimination ; Grand juries ; Exclusionary rule ; Jury selection ; Deterrence
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=112115

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder