Importation of Fruits and Vegetables
[Federal Register: November 10, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 217)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65053-65067]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10no04-2]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. 02-106-2]
Importation of Fruits and Vegetables
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are amending the fruits and vegetables regulations to list
a number of fruits and vegetables from certain parts of the world as
eligible, under specified conditions, for importation into the United
States. All of the fruits and vegetables, as a condition of entry, will
be inspected and subject to treatment at the port of first arrival as
may be required by an inspector. In addition, some of the fruits and
vegetables will be required to meet other special conditions. We are
also recognizing areas in Peru as free from the South American cucurbit
fly. These actions will provide the United States with additional types
and sources of fruits and vegetables while continuing to protect
against the introduction of quarantine pests through imported fruits
and vegetables.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 10, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karen Bedigian, Import Specialist,
Phytosanitary Issues Management, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 140,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1228; (301) 734-4382.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in ``Subpart--Fruits and Vegetables'' (7 CFR 319.56
through 319.56-8, referred to below as the regulations) prohibit or
restrict the importation of fruits and vegetables into the United
States from certain parts of the world to prevent the introduction and
spread of plant pests that are new to or not widely distributed within
the United States.
On December 18, 2003, we published in the Federal Register (68 FR
70448-70463, Docket No. 02-106-1) a proposal to amend the regulations
to list a number of fruits and vegetables from certain parts of the
world as eligible, under specified conditions, for importation into the
United States. We also proposed to recognize areas in Peru as free from
the South American cucurbit fly.
We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending
February 17, 2004. We received five comments by that date. They were
from representatives of State governments, an industry organization,
and individuals. They are discussed below by topic.
Grapes From South Korea
One commenter stated that it is impossible to determine the
efficacy of the proposed risk mitigation method for grapes from South
Korea until a peer review of the supporting data is conducted. The
commenter further stated that data on risk mitigation for Korean grapes
should be published prior to rulemaking in order to increase the
transparency of the regulation.
We do not agree that a peer review of the supporting data is
necessary in order for the efficacy of the phytosanitary measures for
grapes from South Korea to be determined. In the proposed rule, we
cited the pests of concern identified in our risk assessment and
described the phytosanitary measures that would be required to guard
against the entry of those pests, but we did not explicitly link the
role of each measure in addressing the risk presented by each
identified pest of concern. We are providing those connections below.
The quarantine pests of concern for grapes grown in South Korea are
yellow peach moth (Conogethes punctiferalis), grapevine moth
(Eupoecilia ambiguella), leaf-rolling tortix (Sparganothis pilleriana),
apple heliodinid (Stathmopoda auriferella), the plant pathogenic fungus
Monilinia fructigena and the moth Nippoptilia vitis.
Each of these pests exhibits symptoms that are macroscopic and
detectable upon visual inspection. Specifically:
? Yellow peach moth larvae bore into and tunnel the stems
and fruits of host plants. Larvae on the fruit burrow into the green
berries, causing them to split, shrivel, or fall off when damaged.
? Grapevine moth larvae feed on flowers and later on
developing fruit. Larvae cause surface damage to leaves and fruit.
Additionally, larvae may produce webbing on the flower buds and newly
set fruit, which often causes affected parts to drop from the vine.
? Leaf-rolling tortix and Nippoptilia vitis larvae cause
damage to the leaves, fruit, and stem.
? Apple heliodinid larvae cause webbing of the flower buds
and newly set fruit, often causing affected plant parts to drop from
the vine and burrow into the green berries, which may split, shrivel,
or fall off when damaged.
? Monilinia fructigena causes raised light brown pustules on
the fruit that often expand enclosing the fruit to form a dark,
wrinkled, hard mummified fruit
There are three measures in our regulatory approach that
individually and collectively mitigate the risk posed by each of the
six pests. First, field inspections have proven effective since, as
detailed above, the damage these pests cause makes their presence
obvious. Second, fruit is bagged from the time the fruit sets until
harvest. Since bagging is done when the fruit is very young, the risk
of exposure to arthropods and diseases is reduced. Third, fruit is
inspected and certified to be free of the pests of concern by South
Korea's national plant protection organization (NPPO). In addition, an
[[Page 65054]]
additional inspection of a sample of fruit from each consignment will
be conducted upon its arrival in the United States.
These measures have proven to be effective in guarding against
similar pests of concern on sandpears from South Korea and Japan
(yellow peach moth and Monilinia fructigena, as well as two other moths
and a leafroller). We have been importing Japanese and Korean sandpears
under a similar systems approach for over 10 years with no significant
phytosanitary problems.
Finally, we disagree with the commenter's statement that we should
have published data on risk mitigation prior to publication of the
proposed rule. On June 19, 2001, we published in the Federal Register
(66 FR 32923-3928, Docket No. 00-082-1) a notice entitled ``Procedures
and Standards Governing the Consideration of Import Requests'' wherein
we established policies for the publication of risk documents, among
other things. In that document we set out ``routine'' and
``nonroutine'' as the two categories of risk assessments. The terms
``routine'' and ``nonroutine'' do not necessarily connote different
types of risk assessments, but nonroutine assessments are associated
with issues that may require greater resources. In determining the type
of risk assessment, we consider the following factors: Economic value
of the affected crop(s), public interest, environmental and public
health importance, level of uncertainty, local importance, and
precedence (i.e., whether the commodity/origin combination in question,
or a similar combination, has ever been addressed in previous risk
assessments and/or whether the assessment will require the use of new
or different methodologies). Only for nonroutine assessments do we make
the risk assessments available for public review and comment in advance
of rulemaking. Since the issues addressed in our proposed rule were
determined to be routine, we did not make the risk documents prepared
for this proposal available in advance of the proposed rule's
publication.
A second commenter said that the term field needs to be defined.
The commenter also objected to the fact that grapes from a field found
to contain evidence of infestation may be reapproved for export
following one negative inspection.
A definition for the term field can be found in the definitions
portion of the regulations at Sec. 319.56-1. Field is defined as a
plot of land with defined boundaries within a place of production on
which a commodity is grown.
We believe one negative inspection is enough to reapprove a field
for export. Under the systems approach laid out in this document and in
the proposed rule, if evidence of any of the pests of concern is
detected during field inspection, the field will immediately be
rejected, and exports from that field will be canceled until visual
inspection of the vines shows that the infestation has been eradicated.
There are a variety of measures growers may utilize to eliminate
infestation on the leaves, stems, and fruits on the vine. These
measures include contact pesticides in the case of insect infestation,
fungicides in the case of fungal infestation, sanitation measures, weed
removal, pruning, trapping, and/or bait stations. One or more of these
measures would serve to eradicate the pests of concern. As expressed
previously, evidence of the presence of all of the pests of concern is
readily visible; thus we believe that a single inspection would be all
that is necessary to determine whether a field could be reapproved for
participation in the program.
Commodity-Specific Pest Pathways
One commenter stated that beets (Beta vulgaris) from Mexico and
turnips (Brassica spp.) from Peru should be removed from the list of
commodities enterable subject to inspection in Sec. 319.56-2t since
they are both hosts of the potato pathotype of the false root-knot
nematode (Nacobbus aberrans).
Of the two commodities cited by the commenter, only beets from
Mexico are being added to the list in Sec. 319.56-2t in this
rulemaking. Turnips from Peru have been eligible for importation under
the regulations for 11 years and were listed in the proposed rule only
because we set out Sec. 319.56-2t in its entirety due to our revision
of that section's format. By International Plant Protection Convention
(IPPC) standards, a quarantine pest is considered to be ``a pest of
potential economic importance to the area endangered thereby and not
yet present there, or present but not widely distributed and being
officially controlled.'' Since the potato pathotype of the false root-
knot nematode is already present in the United States and not subject
to an official control program, we do not consider it to be a
quarantine pest, therefore we do not regulate imports to protect
against entry of this pest.
Another commenter stated that snow peas (Pisum sativum subsp.
sativum) from Columbia; cole and mustard crops, including cabbage,
broccoli, cauliflower, turnips, mustards, and related varieties
(Brassica spp.) from Ecuador, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Peru, and
Jamaica; Allium spp. from Israel, Mexico, Belgium, and the Netherlands;
Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris) from Peru; beets (Beta vulgaris) from
Mexico; and cucurbits (Cucurbitaceae) from Mexico should be removed
from the list of commodities enterable subject to inspection found at
Sec. 319.56-2t since they are hosts of the pea leaf miner (Liriomyza
huidobrensis Blanchard), which does not occur in the United States.
Another commenter stated that the regulations should specify which
types of cucurbits are allowed entry into the United States from
Mexico.
The only commodities listed by the commenter that are added in this
rulemaking are Allium spp. from Mexico and beets from Mexico. The other
commodities have been eligible for importation prior to this rulemaking
and were listed in the proposed rule only because we set out Sec.
319.56-2t in its entirety due to our revision of that section's format.
Specifically, cucurbits from Mexico have been eligible for importation
under the regulations for 30 years. With regard to Allium spp. and
beets from Mexico, as above, our records indicate that the pea leaf
miner is already present in the United States and not subject to an
official control program, therefore, we do not consider it to be a
quarantine pest.
The commenter additionally stated that the importation of
watermelon from Korea is of concern because of the presence of the
pumpkin fruit fly (Bactrocera depressa). The commenter asked APHIS to
clarify the type of fruit fly trap required, as well as to provide
evidence of its efficacy in trapping the pumpkin fruit fly.
We have considered the commenter's point and have modified the
trapping procedure outlined in the proposed rule to specify that the
fruit fly traps used must be McPhail traps or a similar type with a
protein bait that has been shown to be efficacious in trapping the
pumpkin fruit fly. APHIS has employed the McPhail trap for decades. It
is a generalist trap with a food bait that catches all fruit feeding
tephritids. We use these traps to catch a variety of fruit flies around
the world such as various Bactrocera spp. that are not known to be
attracted by a specific parapheromone lure.
One commenter stated that since the domestic Mexican fruit fly
(Mexfly) regulations at 7 CFR 301.64-2 and the melon fruit fly
regulations at 7 CFR 301.97-2 list Annona spp. as hosts to those flies,
we should have included an analysis of the risk associated with
importation of Annona spp. from Grenada based on the possible presence
[[Page 65055]]
of Mexfly and melon fruit fly in that country.
Our research indicates that neither Mexfly nor melon fruit fly
occur in Grenada. Since there is no scientific evidence of the
existence of these pests in the area in question, there is no need for
further analysis of the risks posed by those pests in this case.
Another commenter claimed that the mitigation methods described in
the proposal with regard to cucurbits (Cucurbitaceae) from South Korea
do not provide adequate protection against cucumber green mottle mosaic
virus (tobamovirus).
Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus is seedborne with no known
biological vectors; it can also be mechanically transmitted. Symptoms
of infection are yellowed leaves and shriveled fruit. These are
macroscopic and detectable upon inspection. Further, the commodities in
question must meet the following conditions:
? The commodities in question must be grown within pest-
proof greenhouses registered with Korea's NPPO.
? The NPPO must also inspect and regularly monitor those
greenhouses and plants, including fruit, at intervals of no more than 2
weeks from the time of fruit set until the end of harvest.
? Each shipment must be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO, with an additional declaration stating
that the commodities were grown in a registered greenhouse.
Growing plants in registered greenhouses will result in additional
scrutiny for symptoms and infected plants will most likely be
discovered and removed. The risk of seed transmission is negligible
since the cucurbits will be imported only for consumption. APHIS is
confident that the inspection and certification measures will serve as
sufficient mitigation against cucumber green mottle mosaic virus.
Another commenter stated that the recent discovery in certain parts
of Mexico of a new phytoplasma related to but distinct from lethal
yellowing disease, which affects coconuts, should be taken into
consideration. The commenter claimed that this new phytoplasma on
coconuts was not included in our risk assessment.
The Malayan dwarf and Maypan varieties of coconut resistant to the
lethal yellowing phytoplasma are also resistant to the new phytoplasma
of concern. Under the requirements set out in the rule portion of this
document, coconut fruit with milk and husk must be accompanied by a
phytosanitary certificate issued by Mexico that includes an additional
declaration stating that the fruit is of the Malayan dwarf variety or
Maypan variety based on verification of the parent stock. This
requirement provides sufficient protection against the spread of
mycoplasmalike organisms.
Shipping and Importation Procedures
One commenter questioned whether roots and soil were included in
our consideration of a whole plant imported specifically from Mexico.
The commodities that were listed in the proposed rule as enterable
from Mexico as whole plants were Allium spp., asparagus, beets,
carrots, eggplants, jicama, parsley, radishes, and tomatoes. All of
these commodities have been previously allowed entry under permit.
Their addition to the regulations is solely in order to improve
transparency.
Currently, the only whole plants allowed importation from Mexico
are Allium spp., beets, carrots, parsley, and radishes. These
commodities are root crops and, as such, are enterable as whole plants
intended for consumption. The other commodities listed enterable as
whole plants in the proposed rule (asparagus, eggplants, jicama, and
tomatoes) were listed as such in error. We have amended the listings in
this final rule in order to correctly list the plant parts that,
historically, have come in under permit. Soil is prohibited entry with
any commodity listed at Sec. 319.56-2t.
Another commenter claimed that the risk of pest contamination is
greater in the case of commercial shipments since the amount of
commodities is greater than that associated with non-commercial
shipments.
Risk of pest dissemination associated with commercial shipments is
generally lower since commercial growers are more likely to utilize
proper phytosanitary practices, are aware of pest problems and the
methods used to control them, and are generally more experienced in
dealing with the importation of various commodities. By contrast,
noncommercial shipments are principally comprised of commodities hand-
carried into the United States by private citizens. There are far fewer
safeguards and assurances associated with such commodities. By
contrast, commercial shipments provide a far higher level of
phytosanitary security.
One commenter stated that lack of funding at the ports of first
arrival in the United States means that many shipments cannot be or are
not inspected.
While the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) conducts a majority
of inspections of agricultural commodities at the ports of first
arrival, inspectors follow established and effective APHIS protocols
regarding inspection rates and procedures. APHIS continues to work with
DHS to ensure that the United States is protected against pests of
concern from agricultural imports. Currently, DHS is sufficiently
staffed at all ports and fully capable of providing the necessary
inspection services.
Pest Risk Assessments
One commenter observed that no statistics on the pest free status
of commercial shipments were included in our risk assessments. The
commenter stated that such information should be available prior to any
approval granted for the importation of new commodities.
Pest risk assessments are prepared for those commodities that have
not been imported previously into the United States. For that reason
there are no pest interception data available to include in our risk
assessments.
Another commenter cited the court decision on APHIS's rule
authorizing the importation of citrus from Argentina (Harlan Land
Company, et al. vs. United States Department of Agriculture) (referred
to below as Harlan Land Co.), and claimed that according to the
decision in that case, APHIS must define what it considers to be a
``negligible level of risk'' in the context of a rule authorizing the
importation of fruit from a disease and pest infested area. The
commenter stated that APHIS must thus define what it considers to be an
acceptable level of risk, and it must adequately explain that
determination, and claimed that the proposed rule does not do so.
We disagree with this comment. In the court decision on APHIS's
rule authorizing the importation of clementines from Spain (Cactus
Corner, LLC, et al. vs. United States Department of Agriculture), the
court concluded that, ``[n]either law nor logic requires an agency to
quantify a numeric threshold of `acceptable risk' every time risk
prevention is sought to be achieved by an agency rule.''
The commenter went on to advise that we should consider all types
of pests, not just those pests that are known to be dangerous. He
argued that pests that pose no danger in their countries of origin may
prove harmful to domestic plants if they become established in the
differing environment in the United States.
We do not regulate imports based on unknown or speculative risks.
We regulate based on sound scientific evidence, consistent with our
authority under the Plant Protection Act. We are
[[Page 65056]]
confident that the mitigation measures detailed in the rule are
sufficient to protect against the scientifically determined pests of
concern.
The commenter cited our failure to consider appropriate monitoring
as a mitigation against infestation and stated that the environmental
assessment does not examine the necessity of monitoring at each stage
of the importation process.
Monitoring, as described by the commenter, is not required in all
cases. Program monitoring is required only when it is found to be
necessary according to pest risk analysis. There is no need to examine
the need for monitoring in the absence of an identified risk. In the
case of this rule, we have determined that all risks are mitigated
sufficiently by the measures described. Our risk assessments found the
probability of artificial spread of pests via these commodities to be
low. Therefore, monitoring at each stage of the import process as
suggested by the commenter becomes unnecessary. We are confident that
the mitigation measures, including port of entry inspection, described
in the rule and considered in the environmental assessment are
sufficient to protect against the quarantine pests of concern.
The commenter stated that a monitoring program must provide a
system by which the public may review and respond to the findings of
that monitoring.
Our Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey (CAPS) reports finds and
movements of damaging foreign organisms from all 50 States and U.S.
territories. CAPS tracks more than 4,000 pests nationwide. The CAPS
survey data collected each year are entered into the National
Agricultural Pest Information System (NAPIS) database which is
available on the Internet at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/. 
Providing constant formal reports on the results of our monitoring
efforts beyond what is available through CAPS/NAPIS would be costly and
time-consuming. Our current rulemaking mechanism allows us to make or
propose changes to the regulations that are based on our consideration
of a variety of complex and changeable factors, including the findings
of monitoring programs.
The commenter suggested that we alter our approach to importation
by phasing in the approved fruit and vegetable imports from each
country over successive years in order to ensure that any pests
imported with the newly allowed commodities will not prove to be
injurious once introduced into the United States.
As a signatory to the IPPC, the United States has agreed not to
prescribe or adopt phytosanitary measures concerning the importation of
plants, plant products, and other regulated articles unless such
measures are made necessary by phytosanitary considerations and are
technically justified. Based on the conclusions of our risk analyses,
we do not believe that there is a technical justification for the
phasing in of imports as suggested by the commenter.
Environmental Assessment
One commenter raised issues regarding the environmental assessment
that we prepared to document our review and analysis of the potential
environmental impacts associated with the proposed rule. A detailed
analysis of the issues raised by the commenter can be found later in
this document under the heading ``National Environmental Policy Act.''
Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this
document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, with the
changes discussed in this document.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The rule
has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 604, we have performed a final
regulatory flexibility analysis, which is set out below, regarding the
economic effects of this rule on small entities.
We are amending the fruits and vegetables regulations to list a
number of fruits and vegetables from certain parts of the world as
eligible, under specified conditions, for importation into the United
States. All of the fruits and vegetables, as a condition of entry, will
be inspected and subject to treatment at the port of first arrival as
may be required by an inspector. In addition, some of the fruits and
vegetables will be required to meet other special conditions. We are
also recognizing areas in Peru as free from the South American cucurbit
fly. These actions will provide the United States with additional types
and sources of fruits and vegetables while continuing to protect
against the introduction of quarantine pests through imported fruits
and vegetables.
We have used all available data to estimate the potential economic
effects of allowing the fruits and vegetables specified in this rule to
be imported into the United States. However, some of the data we
believe would be helpful in making this determination have not been
available. Specifically, data are not available on: (1) The quantity of
certain fruits and vegetables produced domestically; (2) the quantity
of potential imports; and (3) the degree to which imported fruits and
vegetables will displace existing imported or domestic products. In our
proposed rule, we asked the public to provide such data for specific
commodities. In addition, we invited the public to comment on the
potential effects of the proposed rule on small entities, in particular
the number and kind of small entities that may incur benefits or costs
from the implementation of the proposed rule. However, we did not
receive any additional information or data in response to those
requests.
Effects on Small Entities
Data on the number and size of U.S. producers of the various
commodities that will be eligible for importation into the United
States under this rule are not available. However, since most fruit and
vegetable farms are small by Small Business Administration standards,
it is likely that the majority of U.S. farms producing the commodities
discussed below are small entities. The potential economic effects of
this final rule are discussed below by commodity and country of origin.
African horned cucumber from Chile. We are to amending the
regulations to allow the entry of African horned cucumber from Chile.
African horned cucumber is a specialty crop that is grown in small
quantities. Less than 20 acres of the fruit are cultivated in
California, and less than 10 acres in Region V (Olmue) and Region X
(Osorno) of Chile have been cultivated since 1996. Approximately 32,000
pounds of fruit are expected to be shipped to the United States
annually from March to May. There is no reason to believe that allowing
imports of African horned cucumber from Chile will have any significant
economic impact on U.S. entities. In addition, we believe that U.S.
consumers of African horned cucumber will benefit from the increase in
its supply and availability.
Annona spp. from Grenada. We are amending the regulations to allow
the entry of commercial shipments of cherimoya, soursop, custard apple,
sugar apple, and atemoya, which are species of Annona, into the United
States from Grenada. In the United States, Annona spp. are apparently a
specialty crop produced on a small scale mainly in southern California;
thus no data on the U.S. production of Annona
[[Page 65057]]
spp. are available. Although no separate data are available on the
production and trade of Annona spp. from Grenada, data may have been
included with the production of all apples. From 2001 to 2003, Grenada
produced an average of 533 metric tons of apples. In addition, Annona
spp. exports may be included under the category of ``apples, not
elsewhere specified,'' which includes wild apples. The 3-year average
for exports of apples, not elsewhere specified, from Grenada is 5
metric tons. We believe that any exports to the United States will be
minimal and will not have any significant economic effect on U.S.
producers, whether small or large, or consumers. In addition, we
believe that U.S. consumers of Annona spp. will benefit from the
increase in their supply and availability.
Fruit and vegetables from Mexico. We are specifically listing
Allium spp., asparagus, banana, beets, carrots, coconut fruit without
husk, cucurbits, eggplant, grape, jicama, lemon, sour lime, parsley,
pineapple, prickly pear pads, radish, tomato, and tuna as admissible
fruits and vegetables from Mexico. Because these fruits and vegetables
have been admissible into the United States from Mexico under permit,
specifically listing these commodities in the regulations will not have
any economic effect on U.S. producers, whether small or large, or
consumers. While production and trade data are not available for
jicama, prickly pear, and tuna from Mexico or the United States, data
are shown for the other commodities, as available, in table 1. The data
provided in table 1 are based on either a 2- or 3-year average. The
averages presented for most U.S. and Mexican production and trade, as
well as for tomato exports from Mexico, are for the 3-year period of
2000, 2001, and 2002. A 2-year average for 2000 and 2001 is given for
exports from Mexico (except tomatoes), U.S. production of parsley and
beets, and U.S. imports of parsley and cucurbits.
Table 1.--U.S. and Mexican Production and Trade Data (in Metric Tons) of Fruits and Vegetables
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. imports
Commodity U.S. from all U.S. imports Mexican Mexican
production countries from Mexico production exports
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allum spp.:
Shallot and green onion..... 444,429 257,784 159,953 1,021,605 599,491
Garlic...................... 258,680 37,806 14,776 50,894 27,544
Leek and other alliaceous (\1\) 3,040 2,752 (\1\) 87,455
vegetables.................
Asparagus....................... 103,060 75,086 38,231 57,545 44,378
Banana.......................... 12,850 4,232,383 74,560 1,961,201 126,368
Beets........................... 101,738 20,341 15,254 (\1\) 775,100
Carrot.......................... 1,913,700 85,037 23,508 358,054 201,944
Coconut......................... 0 63,075 4,854 1,058,667 87,584
Cucurbits:
Melon and watermelons....... 2,969,250 882,350 363,902 1,469,700 572,529
Cucumbers and gherkins...... 1,078,800 15,035 1,924 416,667 7,880
Pumpkins, squash, and gourds 761,253 223,697 148,343 550,000 372,294
Eggplant........................ 77,290 40,233 36,863 59,000 135,697
Grape........................... 6,495,380 987,124 191,477 427,497 117,510
Lemon and lime.................. 572,250 218,816 184,814 1,658,420 733,184
Parsley......................... 14,210 5,897 (\1\) (\1\) (\1\)
Pineapple....................... 302,500 348,617 19,923 598,629 117,510
Radish.......................... 53,781 15,338 14,654 (\1\) (\1\)
Tomato.......................... 10,590,000 804,548 664,362 2,085,831 1,551,685
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Not available.
Coconut fruit with milk and husk from Mexico. Coconut fruit without
husk have been admissible into the United States from Mexico under
permit. In this final rule, we are amending the regulations to allow
coconut fruit with milk and husk from Mexico to be imported into the
United States. While the data on coconut production and trade do not
differentiate between coconut fruit with or without husk and milk, it
is possible that an increase in imports of coconuts into the United
States from Mexico will occur, since coconut fruit with milk and husk
have previously been inadmissible from Mexico. Because the U.S.
production of coconut fruit with milk and husk is supplemented with
imports in order to satisfy the domestic demand, we do not believe that
allowing the importation of coconut fruit with milk and husk from
Mexico will have a significant effect on either U.S. consumers or
producers. In addition, we believe that U.S. consumers will benefit
from the increase in the supply and availability of coconut fruit with
milk and husk from Mexico.
Pitaya from Mexico. In the United States, pitaya are a specialty
crop produced on a small scale; thus no data on the U.S. production of
pitaya are available. Mexican production and trade data are also not
available.
Melon and watermelon from Peru. We are amending the regulations to
allow the entry of commercial shipments of watermelon and several
varieties of melon (Cucumis melo L. subsp. melo) into the United States
from Peru. The specific varieties of melons that will be considered for
importation include cantaloupe, netted melon (muskmelon, nutmeg melon,
and Persian melon), vegetable melon (snake melon and oriental pickling
melon), and winter melon (honeydew and casaba melon). The melon and
watermelon from Peru will be admissible from the Departments of Lima,
Ica, Arequipa, Moquegua, and Tacna, which we recognize as free of the
South American cucurbit fly.
From 2001 to 2003, the United States produced an average of almost
3 million metric tons of melon and watermelon and imported an average
of 882,350 metric tons. For that same 3-year period, Peru produced an
average of 72,337 metric tons of melon and watermelon. For the 2-year
period of 2000 and 2001, Peru exported an average of 1,393 metric tons
of melon and watermelon. Because the U.S. production of melon and
watermelon is supplemented with imports in order to satisfy the
domestic demand, we do not believe that allowing the importation of
melon and watermelon from certain areas of Peru
[[Page 65058]]
will have a significant effect on either U.S. consumers or producers.
In addition, we believe that U.S. consumers of melon and watermelon
will benefit from the increase in its supply and availability.
Watermelon, squash, cucumber, and oriental melon from the Republic
of Korea. We are amending the regulations to allow watermelon, squash,
cucumber, and oriental melon to be imported into the United States from
the Republic of Korea (South Korea) under certain conditions. Table 2
shows the average U.S. and South Korean production and trade data
available for the 3-year period of 2000, 2001, and 2002, with a 2-year
average for 2000 and 2001 for exports from South Korea. Note that the
data include a broader category than what is actually eligible to be
imported; e.g., we are allowing for the importation of cucumber, but
the data are available under the broader category of cucumber and
gherkins.
Table 2.--Production and Trade Data (in Metric Tons) for U.S. and South Korean Fruits and Vegetables
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. imports U.S. imports
Commodity U.S. from all from South South Korean South Korean
production countries Korea production exports
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Melon and watermelons........... 2,969,250 882,350 0 324,260 428
Cucumbers and gherkins.......... 1,078,800 15,035 0 451,175 7,030
Pumpkins, squash, and gourds.... 761,253 223,697 0 240,161 515
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grapes from South Korea. We are amending the regulations to allow
the importation of grapes into the United States from South Korea under
certain conditions. From 2001 to 2003, the United States produced an
average of almost 6.5 million metric tons of grapes and imported an
average of 987,124 metric tons. For that same 3-year period, South
Korea produced an average of 461,198 metric tons of grapes
(approximately 7 percent of the total U.S. production) with an average
export of 101 metric tons. Because the U.S. production of grapes is
supplemented with imports in order to satisfy the domestic demand, we
do not believe that allowing the importation of grapes from South Korea
will have a significant effect on either U.S. consumers or producers.
In addition, we believe that U.S. consumers of grapes will benefit from
the increase in its supply and availability.
This rule contains various recordkeeping requirements, which were
described in our proposed rule, and which have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget (see ``Paperwork Reduction Act''
below).
Executive Order 12988
This final rule allows certain fruits and vegetables to be imported
into the United States from certain parts of the world. State and local
laws and regulations regarding the importation of fruits and vegetables
under this rule will be preempted while the fruit is in foreign
commerce. Fresh fruits and vegetables are generally imported for
immediate distribution and sale to the consuming public, and remain in
foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate consumer. No retroactive
effect will be given to this rule, and this rule will not require
administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
National Environmental Policy Act
We have prepared an environmental assessment for this rule. The
environmental assessment, entitled ``Rule for the 12th Periodic
Amendment of the Fruits and Vegetables Regulations'' (September 2004),
analyzes alternatives to amending the regulations to allow the
importation into the United States of a number of fruits and vegetables
from various areas of the world under certain conditions. The
environmental assessment may be accessed on the Internet at http://
www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/enviro_docs/. Copies of the environmental
assessment are also available for public inspection at USDA, room 1141,
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. Persons wishing to inspect copies are requested to call ahead
on (202) 690-2817 to facilitate entry into the reading room. In
addition, copies may be obtained by writing to the individual listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
The environmental assessment for this rule analyzes two
alternatives, no action and amending the fruits and vegetables
regulations. The no action alternative would be to leave the fruits and
vegetables regulations unchanged. Under the no action alternative, (1)
certain fruits and vegetables from Mexico (i.e., Allium spp.,
asparagus, banana, beets, carrots, coconuts, cucurbits, eggplant,
grape, jicama, lemon, sour lime, parsley, pineapple, prickly pear pads,
radish, tomato, tuna, coconut [fruit without husk], and pitaya) would
continue to be eligible for importation under permit, and (2) cucurbits
and grapes from South Korea, melon from Peru, pitaya and coconut with
milk and husk from Mexico, Annona spp. from Grenada, and African horned
cucumber from Chile would not be approved for importation into the
United States. Under the second alternative--amending the fruits and
vegetables regulations--the previously named fruits and vegetables from
Mexico that have been enterable under permit would be listed as
enterable in the regulations, and the listed fruits and vegetables from
South Korea, Peru, Mexico, Grenada, and Chile would become eligible for
importation into the United States under certain phytosanitary conditions.
The environmental assessment describes the potential environmental
effects associated with each alternative. The environmental assessment
also describes the phytosanitary measures required for the importation
of each commodity, including treatment, specified growing conditions,
limits on dates of shipping, inspection and monitoring of growing areas
by the plant protection organization of the country where grown,
trapping in the growing areas, fruit cutting, safeguarding during
transport, and/or permits and phytosanitary certificates. These
measures have been designed to safeguard all potentially affected
aspects of the human environment, including human health and safety,
non-target species, and protected species and habitat.
We omitted one commodity, coconut with milk and husk of the Malayan
Dwarf and Maypan hybrid varieties from Mexico, from the environmental
assessment that was prepared for the proposed rule and made available
to the public for comment. An analysis of this commodity has been added
to the environmental assessment prepared for this final rule. Two
quarantine pests of
[[Page 65059]]
concern were identified in the proposed rule as being associated with
this commodity, the red ring nematode and lethal yellowing disease. We
have determined that the risk associated with red ring nematode is low
since nuts on infected trees fall prematurely and would not be
harvested. The risk of introduction of lethal yellowing disease would
also be low since coconuts with husk and milk of the Malayan Dwarf and
Maypan hybrids do not harbor lethal yellowing disease, including the
new phytoplasma mentioned by one of the commenters and discussed
earlier in this final rule.
As stated in the background section of this final rule, one
commenter raised objections to the review and analysis of potential
environmental impacts contained in the environmental assessment
prepared for the proposed rule. The commenter raised several issues,
which are discussed below.
The commenter stated that, under the Endangered Species Act,
Federal agencies are required to consult with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
to ensure that their actions will not prove harmful to any listed
species. He further stated that APHIS had not performed such
consultations and asked that we do so.
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 requires that
Federal agencies ensure their actions are not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or result
in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat.
Consultation with FWS and/or NMFS is required only if the proposed
action ``may affect'' listed species or critical habitat.
Prior to the publication of the proposed rule, APHIS prepared a
biological assessment to consider the potential risks to federally
listed threatened and endangered species and species proposed for
listing that could be posed by the proposed importation of certain
fruits and vegetables from Mexico, Chile, Grenada, South Korea, and
Peru. Based upon the ability of the phytosanitary measures described in
the proposed rule to eliminate risks from shipments of these fruits and
vegetables, we determined that the importation of those commodities
would not affect any endangered and threatened species or their
habitats. This ``no effect'' determination is the appropriate
conclusion when an agency determines that its proposed action will not
affect listed species or designated critical habitats. Consultation
with FWS and/or NMFS is not required if the agency has considered the
effects of the proposed action on threatened, endangered, and proposed
species and determined that it will have no effect on those species or
their critical habitats.
The commenter asked that APHIS, in its environmental assessment,
address the cumulative impacts of pesticides and pests on the
commodities in question, the environment, and on humans. He
additionally stated that it is necessary to investigate the infestation
potential of pests when introduced into a new environment, to identify
those undesirable qualities in pests that may be triggered by
environmental factors, and to consider the possibility of destructive
hybridization occurring between native and non-native pests.
Our environmental assessments are uniformly prepared subsequent to
our consideration of the best and most up-to-date scientific data. No
scientific evidence exists to support the commenter's requests. As
stated previously, in the unlikely event of a non-native pest being
introduced into the United States via an imported fruit or vegetable,
we have the authority to immediately prohibit or further restrict the
importation of that commodity. Such action would almost certainly be
taken if a pest were to display new and destructive characteristics
following its introduction into the United States.
APHIS has considered the potential effects of this final rule on
the quality of the human environment. The exclusionary nature of the
phytosanitary measures required by this rule will prevent entry of
invasive species of concern that are associated with the fruits and
vegetables, and this exclusion precludes any effects on native species
or their habitats. Based on the analysis provided in the environmental
assessment and our assessment of the comments submitted on the proposed
rule and its accompanying environmental assessment, implementation of
the rule will not significantly impact the quality of the human
environment and an environmental impact statement does not need to be
prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), the information collection or recordkeeping requirements
included in this rule have been approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under OMB control number 0579-0236.
Government Paperwork Elimination Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA), which
requires Government agencies in general to provide the public the
option of submitting information or transacting business electronically
to the maximum extent possible. For information pertinent to GPEA
compliance related to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste Sickles,
APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 734-7477.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Honey, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
? Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 319 to read as follows:
PART 319--FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES
? 1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450 and 7701-7772; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
? 2. Section 319.56-1 is amended by adding, in alphabetical order, a new
definition for country of origin to read as follows:
Sec. 319.56-1 Definitions.
* * * * *
Country of origin. Country where the plants from which the plant
products are derived were grown.
* * * * *
? 3. Section 319.56-2t is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 319.56-2t Administrative instructions: Conditions governing the
entry of certain fruits and vegetables.
(a) The following commodities may be imported into all parts of the
United States, unless otherwise indicated, from the places specified,
in accordance with Sec. 319.56-6 and all other applicable requirements
of this subpart:
[[Page 65060]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional
restrictions (see
Country/locality Common name Botanical name Plant part(s) paragraph (b) of
this section)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Argentina....................... Artichoke, globe.. Cynara scolymus... Immature flower
head.
Basil............. Ocimum spp........ Above ground parts
Currant........... Ribes spp......... Fruit.............
Endive............ Cichorium endivia. Leaf and stem.....
Gooseberry........ Ribes spp......... Fruit.............
Marjoram.......... Origanum spp...... Above ground parts
Oregano........... Origanum spp...... Above ground parts
Australia....................... Currant........... Ribes spp......... Fruit.............
Gooseberry........ Ribes spp......... Fruit.............
Austria......................... Asparagus, white.. Asparagus Shoot (no green
officinalis. may be visible on
the shoot).
Barbados........................ Banana............ Musa spp.......... Flower............
Belgium......................... Leek.............. Allium spp........ Whole plant....... (b)(5)(i)
Pepper............ Capsicum spp...... Fruit.............
Belize.......................... Banana............ Musa spp.......... Flower in bracts
with stems.
Bay leaf.......... Laurus nobilis.... Leaf and stem.....
Mint.............. Mentha spp........ Above ground parts
Papaya............ Carica papaya..... Fruit............. (b)(1)(i),
(b)(2)(iii).
Rambutan.......... Nephelium Fruit............. (b)(2)(i),
lappaceum. (b)(5)(iii).
Sage.............. Salivia Leaf and stem.
officinalis.
Tarragon.......... Artemisia Above ground
dracunculus. parts.
Bermuda......................... Avocado........... Persea americana.. Fruit.
Carambola......... Averrhoa carambola Fruit.
Grapefruit........ Citrus paradisi... Fruit.
Guava............. Psidium guajava... Fruit.
Lemon............. Citrus limon...... Fruit.
Longan............ Dimocarpus longan. Fruit.
Loquat............ Eriobotrya Fruit.
japonica.
Mandarin orange... Citrus reticulata. Fruit.
Natal plum........ Carissa macrocarpa Fruit.
Orange, sour...... Citrus aurantium.. Fruit.
Orange, sweet..... Citrus sinensis... Fruit.
Papaya............ Carica papaya..... Fruit.
Passion fruit..... Passiflora spp.... Fruit.
Peach............. Prunus persica.... Fruit.
Pineapple guava... Feijoa spp........ Fruit.
Suriname cherry... Eugenia uniflora.. Fruit.
Bolivia......................... Belgian endive.... Cichorium intybus. Leaf.
Chile........................... African horned Cucumis Fruit............. (b)(2)(i).
cucumber. metuliferus.
Babaco............ Carica x heilborni Fruit............. (b)(1)(i).
var. pentagona.
Basil............. Ocimum spp........ Above ground
parts.
Lucuma............ Manilkara sapota Fruit............. (b)(1)(i).
(=Lucuma mammosa).
Mountain papaya... Carica pubescens Fruit............. (b)(1)(ii).
(=C.
candamarcensis).
Oregano........... Origanum spp...... Leaf and stem.
Pepper............ Capsicum annuum... Fruit............. (b)(1)(i).
Sandpear.......... Pyrus pyrifolia... Fruit............. (b)(1)(ii).
Tarragon.......... Artemisia Above ground
dracunculus. parts.
China........................... Bamboo............ Bambuseae spp..... Edible shoot, free
of leaves and
roots.
Colombia........................ Rhubarb........... Rheum rhabarbarum. Stalk.
Snow pea.......... Pisum sativum Flat, immature
subsp. sativum. pod.
Tarragon.......... Artemisia Above ground
dracunculus. parts.
Cook Islands.................... Banana............ Musa spp.......... Green fruit....... (b)(4)(i).
Cucumber.......... Cucumis sativus... Fruit.
Drumstick......... Moringa Leaf.
pterygosperma.
Ginger............ Zingiber Root.............. (b)(2)(ii).
officinale.
Indian mulberry... Morinda citrifolia Leaf.
Lemongrass........ Cymbopogon spp.... Leaf.
Tossa jute........ Corchorus Leaf.
olitorius.
Costa Rica...................... Basil............. Ocimum spp........ Whole plant.
Chinese kale...... Brassica Leaf and stem.
alboglabra.
Chinese turnip.... Raphanus sativus.. Root.
Cole and mustard Brassica spp...... Whole plant of
crops, including edible varieties
cabbage, only.
broccoli,
cauliflower,
turnips,
mustards, and
related varieties.
[[Page 65061]]
Jicama............ Pachyrhizus Root.
tuberosus or P.
erosus.
Rambutan.......... Nephelium Fruit............. (b)(2)(i),
lappaceum. (b)(5)(iii).
Dominican Republic.............. Bamboo............ Bambuseae spp..... Edible shoot, free
of leaves and
roots.
Durian............ Durio zibethinus.. Fruit.
Ecuador......................... Banana............ Musa spp.......... Flower.
Basil............. Ocimum spp........ Above ground
parts.
Chervil........... Anthriscus spp.... Leaf and stem.
Cole and mustard Brassica spp...... Whole plant of
crops, including edible varieties
cabbage, only.
broccoli,
cauliflower,
turnips,
mustards, and
related varieties.
Radicchio......... Cichorium spp..... Above ground
parts.
El Salvador..................... Basil............. Ocimum spp........ Above ground
parts.
Cilantro.......... Coriandrum sativum Above ground
parts..
Cole and mustard Brassica spp...... Whole plant of
crops, including edible varieties
cabbage, only.
broccoli,
cauliflower,
turnips,
mustards, and
related varieties.
Dill.............. Anethum graveolens Above ground
parts.
Eggplant.......... Solanum melongena. Fruit with stem... (b)(3).
Fennel............ Foeniculum vulgare Leaf and stem..... (b)(2)(i).
German chamomile.. Matricaria Flower and leaf... (b)(2)(i).
recutita and
Matricaria
chamomilla.
Loroco............ Fernaldia spp..... Flower, leaf, and
stem.
Oregano or sweet Origanum spp...... Leaf and stem..... (b)(2)(i).
marjoram.
Parsley........... Petroselinum Leaf and stem..... (b)(2)(i).
crispum.
Rambutan.......... Nephelium Fruit............. (b)(2)(i),
lappaceum. (b)(5)(iii).
Rosemary.......... Rosmarinus Leaf and stem..... (b)(2)(i).
officinalis.
Waterlily or lotus Nelumbo nucifera.. Roots without soil (b)(2)(i).
Yam-bean or Jicama Pachyrhizus supp.. Roots without soil (b)(2)(i).
France.......................... Tomato............ Lycopersicon Fruit, stem, and (b)(4)(ii).
esculentum. leaf.
Great Britain................... Basil............. Ocimum spp........ Leaf and stem.
Grenada......................... Abiu.............. Pouteria caimito.. Fruit.
Atemoya........... Annona squamosa x Fruit............. (b)(3).
A. cherimola.
Bilimbi........... Averrhoa bilimbi.. Fruit.
Breadnut.......... Brosimum Fruit.
alicastrum.
Cherimoya......... Annona (b)(3).
cherimolaFruit.
Cocoplum.......... Chrysobalanus Fruit.
icaco.
Cucurbits......... Cucurbitaceae..... Fruit.
Custard apple..... Annona (b)(3).
reticulataFruit.
Durian............ Durio zibethinus.. Fruit.
Jackfruit......... Artocarpus Fruit.
heterophyllus.
Jambolan.......... Syzygium cumini... Fruit.
Jujube............ Ziziphus spp...... Fruit.
Langsat........... Lansium domesticum Fruit.
Litchi............ Litchi chinensis.. Fruit.
Malay apple....... Syzygium Fruit.
malaccense.
Mammee apple...... Mammea americana.. Fruit.
Peach palm........ Bactris gasipaes.. Fruit.
Piper............. Piper spp......... Fruit.
Pulasan........... Nephelium Fruit.
ramboutan-ake.
Rambutan.......... Nephelium Fruit.
Iappaceum.
Rose apple........ Syzygium jambos... Fruit.
Santol............ Sandoricum Fruit.
koetjape.
Sapote............ Pouteria sapota... Fruit.
Soursop........... Annona muricata... Fruit. (b)(3).
Supar apple....... Annona squamosa... Fruit. (b)(3).
Guatemala....................... Artichoke, globe.. Cynara scolymus... Immature flower
head.
Basil............. Ocimum spp........ Above ground
parts.
Dill.............. Anethum Above ground
graveonlens. parts.
Eggplant.......... Solanum melongena. Fruit with stem.
Fennel............ Foeniculum vulgare Leaf and stem..... (b)(2)(i).
German chamomile.. Matricaria Flower and leaf... (b)(2)(i).
chamomilla and
Matricaria
recutita.
Jicama............ Pachyrhizus Root.
tuberosus or P.
erosus.
[[Page 65062]]
Loroco............ Fernaldia spp..... Flower and leaf.
Mint.............. Mentha spp........ Above ground
parts.
Oregano........... Origanum spp...... Leaf and stem.
Papaya............ Carica papaya..... Fruit............. (b)(1)(i),
(b)(2)(iii).
Rambutan.......... Nephelium Fruit............. (b)(2)(i),
lappaceum. (b)(5)(iii).
Rhubarb........... Rheum rhabarbarum. Above ground
parts.
Rosemary.......... Rosmarinus Leaf and stem..... (b)(2)(i).
officinalis.
Tarragon.......... Artemisia Above ground
dracunculus. parts.
Waterlily or lotus Nelumbo nucifera.. Roots without soil (b)(2)(i).
Haiti........................... Jackfruit......... Artocarpus Fruit.
heterophyllus.
Honduras........................ Banana............ Musa spp.......... Flower.
Basil............. Ocimum basilicum.. Leaf and stem..... (b)(2)(i),
(b)(5)(iv).
Chicory........... Cichorium spp..... Leaf and stem.
Cilantro.......... Coriandrum sativum Above ground
parts.
Cole and mustard Brassica spp...... Whole plant of
crops, including edible varieties
cabbage, only.
broccoli,
cauliflower,
turnips,
mustards, and
related varieties.
German chamomile.. Matricaria Flower and leaf... (b)(2)(i).
recutita and
Matricaria
chamomilla.
Loroco............ Fernaldia spp..... Flower and leaf.
Oregano or sweet Origanum spp...... Leaf and stem..... (b)(2)(i).
marjoram.
Radish............ Raphanus sativus.. Root.
Rambutan.......... Nephelium Fruit............. (b)(2)(i),
lappaceum. (b)(5)(iii).
Waterlily or lotus Nelumbo nucifera.. Roots without soil (b)(2)(i)
Yam-bean or Jicama Pachyrhizus spp... Roots without soil (b)(2)(i).
Indonesia....................... Dasheen........... Colocasia spp, Tuber............. (b)(2)(iv).
Alocasia spp, and
Xanthosoma spp.
Onion............. Allium cepa....... Bulb.
Shallot........... Allium ascalonicum Bulb.
Israel.......................... Arugula........... Eruca sativa...... Leaf and stem.
Chives............ Allium Leaf.
schoenoprasum.
Dill.............. Anethum graveolens Above ground
parts.
Mint.............. Mentha spp........ Above ground
parts.
Parsley........... Petroselinum Above ground
crispum. parts.
Watercress........ Nasturtium Leaf and stem.
officinale.
Jamaica......................... Fenugreek......... Tirgonella foenum- Leaf, stem, root.
graceum.
Jackfruit......... Artocarpus Fruit.
heterophyllus.
Ivy gourd......... Coccinia grandis.. Fruit.
Pak choi.......... Brassica chinensis Leaf and stem.
Pointed gourd..... Trichosanthes Fruit.
dioica.
Japan........................... Bamboo............ Bambuseae spp..... Edible shoot, free
of leaves and
roots.
Mioga ginger...... Zingiber mioga.... Above ground
parts.
Mung bean......... Vigna radiata..... Seed sprout.
Soybean........... Glycine max....... Seed sprout.
Liberia......................... Jute.............. Corchorus Leaf.
capsularis.
Potato............ Solanum tuberosum. Leaf.
Mexico.......................... Allium............ Allium spp........ Whole plant.
Anise............. Pimpinella anisum. Leaf and stem.
Apple............. Malus domestica... Fruit............. (b)(1)(iii).
Apricot........... Prunus armeniaca.. Fruit............. (b)(1)(iii).
Arugula........... Eruca sativa...... Leaf and stem.
Asparagus......... Asparagus Shoot.
officinalis.
Banana............ Musa spp.......... Flower and fruit.
Bay leaf.......... Laurus nobilis.... Leaf and stem.
Beet.............. Beta vulgaris..... Whole plant.
Blueberry......... Vaccinium spp..... Fruit.
Carrot............ Daucus carota..... Whole plant.
Coconut........... Cocos nucifera.... Fruit without
husk.
Fruit with milk (b)(5)(v).
and husk.
Cucurbits......... Cucurbitaceae..... Inflorescence,
flower, and
fruit.
Eggplant.......... Solanum melongena. Fruit with stem.
Fig............... Ficus carica...... Fruit............. (b)(1)(iii),
(b)(2)(i).
Grape............. Vitis spp......... Fruit, cluster,
and leaf.
[[Page 65063]]
Grapefruit........ Citrus paradisi... Fruit............. (b)(1)(iii).
Jicama............ Pachyrhizus Root.
tuberosus.
Lambsquarters..... Chenopodium spp... Above ground
parts.
Lemon............. Citrus limon...... Fruit.
Lime, sour........ Citrus Fruit.
aurantiifolia.
Mango............. Mangifera indica.. Fruit............. (b)(1)(iii).
Orange............ Citrus sinensis... Fruit............. (b)(1)(iii).
Parsley........... Petroselinum Whole plant.
crispum.
Peach............. Prunus persica.... Fruit............. (b)(1)(iii).
Persimmon......... Diospyros spp..... Fruit............. (b)(1)(iii).
Pineapple......... Ananas comosus.... Fruit.
Pitaya............ Hylocereus spp.... Frui.............. (b)(1)(iv),
(b)(2)(i).
Piper............. Piper spp......... Leaf and stem.
Pomegranate....... Punica granatum... Fruit............. (b)(1)(iii).
Porophyllum....... Porophyllum spp... Above ground
parts.
Prickly-pear pad.. Opuntia spp....... Pad.
Radish............ Raphanus sativus.. Whole plant.
Rambutan.......... Nephelium Fruit............. (b)(2)(i),
lappaceum. (b)(5)(iii).
Rosemary.......... Rosmarinus Above ground
officinalis. parts.
Salicornia........ Salicornia spp.... Above ground
parts.
Tangerine......... Citrus reticulata. Fruit............. (b)(1)(iii).
Tepeguaje......... Leucaena spp...... Fruit.
Thyme............. Thymus vulgaris... Above ground
parts.
Tomato............ Lycopersicon Fruit, stem, and
lycopersicum. leaf.
Tuna.............. Opuntia spp....... Fruit.
Morocco......................... Strawberry........ Fragaria spp...... Fruit.
Morocco and Western Sahara...... Tomato............ Lycopersicon Fruit, stem, and (b)(4)(ii)
esculentum. leaf.
Netherlands..................... Leek.............. Allium spp........ Whole plant....... (b)(5)(i).
Radish............ Raphanus sativus.. Root.
New Zealand..................... Avocado........... Persea americana.. Fruit.
Fig............... Ficus carica...... Fruit.
Oca............... Oxalis tuberosa... Tuber.
Nicaragua....................... Cilantro.......... Coriandrum sativum Above ground
parts.
Cole and mustard Brassica spp...... Whole plant of
crops, including edible varieties
cabbage, only.
broccoli,
cauliflower,
turnips,
mustards, and
related varieties.
Eggplant.......... Solanum melongena. Fruit with stem... (b)(3).
Fennel............ Foeniculum vulgare Leaf and stem..... (b)(2)(i).
German chamomile.. Matricaria Flower and leaf... (b)(2)(i).
recutita and M.
chamomilla.
Loroco............ Fernaldia spp..... Leaf and stem.
Mint.............. Mentha spp........ Above ground
parts.
Parsley........... Petroselinum Above ground
crispum. parts.
Radicchio......... Cichorium spp..... Above ground
parts.
Rambutan.......... Nephelium Fruit............. (b)(2)(i),
lappaceum. (b)(5)(iii).
Rosemary.......... Rosmarinus Above ground
officinalla. parts.
Waterlily or lotus Nelumbo nucifera.. Roots without (b)(2)(i).
soil.
Yam-bean or Jicama Pachyrhizus spp... Roots without (b)(2)(i).
soil.
Panama.......................... Basil............. Ocimum spp........ Above ground
parts.
Bean, green and Phaseolus vulgaris Seed.
lima. and P. lunatus.
Belgian endive.... Cichorium spp..... Above ground
parts.
Chervil........... Anthriscus Above ground
cerefolium. parts.
Chicory........... Cichorium spp..... Above ground
parts.
Eggplant.......... Solanum melongena. Fruit with stem.
Endive............ Cichorium spp..... Above ground
parts.
Fenugreek......... Tirgonella foenum- Leaf and stem.
graceum.
Lemon thyme....... Thymus citriodorus Leaf and stem.
Mint.............. Mentha spp........ Above ground
parts.
Oregano........... Origanum spp...... Above ground
parts.
Rambutan.......... Nephelium Fruit. (b)(2)(i),
lappaceum. (b)(5)(iii).
Rosemary.......... Rosmarinus Above ground
officinalis. parts.
Tarragon.......... Artemisia Above ground
dracunculus. parts.
Peru............................ Arugula........... Eruca sativa...... Leaf and stem.
Basil............. Ocimum spp........ Leaf and stem.
Carrot............ Daucus carota..... Root.
[[Page 65064]]
Chervil........... Anthriscus spp.... Leaf and stem.
Cole and mustard Brassica spp...... Whole plant of
crops, including edible varieties
cabbage, only.
broccoli,
cauliflower,
turnips,
mustards, and
related varieties.
Cornsalad......... Valerianella spp.. Whole plant.
Dill.............. Anethum graveolens Above ground
parts.
Lambsquarters..... Chenopodium album. Above ground
parts.
Lemongrass........ Cymbopogon spp.... Leaf and stem.
Marjoram.......... Origanum spp...... Above ground
parts.
Mustard greens.... Brassica juncea... Leaf.
Oregano........... Origanum spp...... Leaf and stem.
Parsley........... Petroselinum Leaf and stem.
crispum.
Radicchio......... Cichorium spp..... Leaf.
Swiss chard....... Beta vulgaris..... Leaf and stem.
Thyme............. Thymus vulgaris... Above ground
parts.
Philippines..................... Jicama............ Pachyrhizus Root.
tuberosus or P.
erosus.
Poland.......................... Pepper............ Capsicum spp...... Fruit.
Tomato............ Lycopersicon Fruit, stem, and
esculentum. leaf.
Republic of Korea............... Angelica.......... Aralia elata...... Edible shoot.
Aster greens...... Aster scaber...... Leaf and stem.
Bonnet bellflower. Codonopsis Root.
lanceolata.
Chard............. Beta vulgaris Leaf.
subsp. cicla.
Chinese bellflower Platycodon Root.
grandiflorum.
Dasheen........... Colocasia spp., Root.............. (b)(2)(iv).
Alocasia spp.,
and Xanthosoma
spp.
Eggplant.......... Solanum melongena. Fruit with stem.
Kiwi.............. Actinidia Fruit.
deliciosa.
Lettuce........... Lactuca sativa.... Leaf.
Mugwort........... Artemisia vulgaris Leaf and stem.
Onion............. Allium cepa....... Bulb.
Shepherd's purse.. Capsella bursa- Leaf and stem.
pastoris.
Strawberry........ Fragaria spp...... Fruit............. (b)(5)(ii).
Watercress........ Nasturtium Leaf and stem.
officinale.
Youngia greens.... Youngia Leaf, stem, and
sonchifolia. root.
Sierra Leone.................... Cassava........... Manihot esculenta. Leaf.
Jute.............. Corchorus Leaf.
capsularis.
Potato............ Solanum tuberosum. Leaf.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines.. Turmeric.......... Curcuma longa..... Rhizome.
South Africa.................... Artichoke, globe.. Cynara scolymus... Immature flower
head.
Pineapple......... Ananas spp........ Fruit.
Spain........................... Eggplant.......... Solanum melongena. Fruit with stem... (b)(3).
Tomato............ Lycopersicon Fruit, stem, and (b)(4)(ii).
esculentum. leaf.
Watermelon........ Citrullus lanatus. Fruit............. (b)(3).
Suriname........................ Amaranth.......... Amaranthus spp.... Leaf and stem.
Black palm nut.... Astrocaryum spp... Fruit.
Jessamine......... Cestrum latifolium Leaf and stem.
Malabar spinach... Bassella alba..... Leaf and stem.
Mung bean......... Vigna radiata..... Seed sprout.
Pak choi.......... Brassica chinensis Leaf and stem.
Sweden.......................... Dill.............. Anethum graveolens Above ground
parts.
Taiwan.......................... Bamboo............ Bambuseae spp..... Edible shoot, free
of leaves and
roots.
Burdock........... Arctium lappa..... Root.
Wasabi (Japanese Wasabia japonica.. Root and stem.
horseradish).
Thailand........................ Dasheen........... Alocasia spp., Leaf and stem.
Colocasia spp.,
and Xanthosoma
spp.
Tumeric........... Curcuma domestica. Leaf and stem.
Tonga........................... Burdock........... Arctium lappa..... Root, stem, and
leaf.
Jicama tuberosus.. Pachyrhizus Root.
tuberosus.
Pumpkin........... Cucurbit maximaa.. Fruit.
Trinidad and Tobago............. Lemongrass........ Cymbopogon Leaf and stem.
citratus.
Leren............. Calathea allouia.. Tuber.
Shield leaf....... Cecropia peltata.. Leaf and stem.
Zambia.......................... Snow pea.......... Pisum sativum spp. Flat, immature
sativum. pod.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 65065]]
(b) Additional restrictions for applicable fruits and vegetables as
specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
(1) Free areas. (i) The commodity must be from a Medfly-free area
listed in Sec. 319.56-2(j) and must be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the national plant protection organization (NPPO)
of the country of origin with an additional declaration stating that
the commodity originated in a Medfly-free area.
(ii) The commodity must be from a Medfly-free area listed in Sec.
319.56-2(j) and must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate
issued by the NPPO of the country of origin with an additional
declaration stating that the commodity originated in a free area. Fruit
from outside Medfly-free areas must be treated in accordance with Sec.
319.56-2x of this subpart.
(iii) The commodity must be from a fruit-fly free area listed in
Sec. 319.56-2(h) and must be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO of the country of origin with an
additional declaration stating that the commodity originated in a free
area.
(iv) The commodity must be from a fruit-fly free area listed in
Sec. 319.56-2(h) and must be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO of the country of origin with an
additional declaration stating: ``These regulated articles originated
in an area free from pests as designated in 7 CFR 319.56-2(h) and, upon
inspection, were found free of Dysmicoccus neobrevipes and Planococcus
minor.''
(2) Restricted importation and distribution. (i) Prohibited entry
into Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Hawaii, and Guam. Cartons in which
commodity is packed must be stamped ``Not for importation into or
distribution within PR, VI, HI, or Guam.''
(ii) Prohibited entry into Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, and Guam.
Cartons in which commodity is packed must be stamped ``Not for
importation into or distribution within PR, VI, or Guam.''
(iii) Prohibited entry into Hawaii. Cartons in which commodity is
packed must be stamped ``Not for importation into or distribution
within HI.''
(iv) Prohibited entry into Guam. Cartons in which commodity is
packed must be stamped ``Not for importation into or distribution
within Guam.''
(3) Commercial shipments only.
(4) Stage of fruit. (i) The bananas must be green at the time of
export. Inspectors at the port of arrival will determine that the
bananas were green at the time of export if:
(A) Bananas shipped by air are still green upon arrival in the
United States; and
(B) Bananas shipped by sea are either still green upon arrival in
the United States or yellow but firm.
(ii) The tomatoes must be green upon arrival in the United States.
Pink or red fruit may only be imported in accordance with Sec. 319.56-
2dd of this subpart.
(5) Other conditions. (i) Must be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO of the country of origin with an
additional declaration stating that the commodity is apparently free of
Acrolepiopsis assectella.
(ii) Entry permitted only from September 15 to May 31, inclusive,
to prevent the introduction of a complex of exotic pests including, but
not limited to a thrips (Haplothrips chinensis) and a leafroller (Capua
tortrix).
(iii) Must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by
the NPPO of the country of origin with an additional declaration
stating that the fruit is free from Coccus moestus, C. viridis,
Dysmicoccus neobrevipes, Planococcus lilacinus, P. minor, and
Psedococcus landoi; and all damaged fruit was removed from the shipment
prior to export under the supervision of the NPPO.
(iv) Must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by
the NPPO of the country of origin with an additional declaration
stating that the fruit is free from Planococcus minor.
(v) Must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by
the NPPO of the country of origin with an additional declaration
stating that the fruit is of the Malayan dwarf variety or Maypan
variety (=F1 hybrid, Malayan DwarfxPanama Tall) (which are
resistant to lethal yellowing disease) based on verification of the
parent stock.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
numbers 0579-0049 and 0579-0236)
? 4. Sections 319.56-2y and 319.56-2aa are revised and a new Sec.
319.56-2ll is added to read as follows:
Sec. 319.56-2y Conditions governing the entry of melon and watermelon
from certain countries in South America.
(a) Cantaloupe and watermelon from Ecuador. Cantaloupe (Cucumis
melo) and watermelon (fruit) (Citrullus lanatus) may be imported into
the United States from Ecuador only in accordance with this paragraph
and all other applicable requirements of this subpart:
(1) The cantaloupe or watermelon may be imported in commercial
shipments only.
(2) The cantaloupe or watermelon must have been grown in an area
where trapping for the South American cucurbit fly (Anastrepha grandis)
has been conducted for at least the previous 12 months by the national
plant protection organization (NPPO) of Ecuador, under the direction of
APHIS, with no findings of the pest.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Information on the trapping program may be obtained by
writing to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service,
International Services, Stop 3432, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-3432.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) The following area meets the requirements of paragraph (a)(2)
of this section: The area within 5 kilometers of either side of the
following roads:
(i) Beginning in Guayaquil, the road north through Nobol,
Palestina, and Balzar to Velasco-Ibarra (Empalme);
(ii) Beginning in Guayaquil, the road south through E1 26, Puerto
Inca, Naranjal, and Camilo Ponce to Enriquez;
(iii) Beginning in Guayaquil, the road east through Palestina to
Vinces;
(iv) Beginning in Guayaquil, the road west through Piedrahita
(Novol) to Pedro Carbo; or
(v) Beginning in Guayaquil, the road west through Progreso,
Engunga, Tugaduaja, and Zapotal to El Azucar.
(4) The cantaloupe or watermelon may not be moved into Alabama,
American Samoa, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Guam, Hawaii,
Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Texas,
and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The boxes in which the cantaloupe or
watermelon is packed must be stamped with the name of the commodity
followed by the words ``Not to be distributed in the following States
or territories: AL, AS, AZ, CA, FL, GA, GU, HI, LA, MS, NM, PR, SC, TX, VI''.
(b) Cantaloupe, honeydew melons, and watermelon from Brazil.
Cantaloupe, honeydew melons, and watermelon may be imported into the
United States from Brazil only in accordance with this paragraph and
all other applicable requirements of this subpart:
(1) The cantaloupe, honeydew melons, or watermelon must have been
grown in the area of Brazil considered by APHIS to be free of the South
American cucurbit fly in accordance with Sec. 319.56-2(e)(4) of this
subpart.
(i) The following area in Brazil is considered free of the South
American cucurbit fly: That portion of Brazil bounded on the north by
the Atlantic Ocean; on the east by the River Assu (Acu) from the
Atlantic Ocean to the city of Assu; on the south by Highway BR 304 from
the city of Assu (Acu) to Mossoro, and by Farm Road RN-015
[[Page 65066]]
from Mossoro to the Ceara State line; and on the west by the Ceara
State line to the Atlantic Ocean.
(ii) All shipments of cantaloupe, honeydew melons, and watermelon
must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the NPPO
of Brazil that includes a declaration indicating that the fruit was
grown in an area recognized to be free of the South American cucurbit fly.
(2) The cantaloupe, honeydew melons, and watermelon must be packed
in an enclosed container or vehicle, or must be covered by a pest-proof
screen or plastic tarpaulin while in transit to the United States.
(3) All shipments of cantaloupe, honeydew melons, and watermelon
must be labeled in accordance with Sec. 319.56-2(g) of this subpart.
(c) Cantaloupe, honeydew melons, and watermelon from Venezuela.
Cantaloupe, honeydew melons, and watermelon may be imported into the
United States from Venezuela only in accordance with this paragraph and
all other applicable requirements of this subpart:
(1) The cantaloupe, honeydew melons, or watermelon must have been
grown in the area of Venezuela considered by APHIS to be free of the
South American cucurbit fly in accordance with Sec. 319.56-2(e)(4) of
this subpart.
(i) The following area in Venezuela is considered free of the South
American cucurbit fly: The Paraguana Peninsula, located in the State of
Falcon, bounded on the north and east by the Caribbean Ocean, on the
south by the Gulf of Coro and an imaginary line dividing the autonomous
districts of Falcon and Miranda, and on the west by the Gulf of
Venezuela.
(ii) All shipments of cantaloupe, honeydew melons, and watermelon
must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the NPPO
of Venezuela that includes a declaration indicating that the fruit was
grown in an area recognized to be free of the South American cucurbit fly.
(2) The cantaloupe, honeydew melons, and watermelon must be packed
in an enclosed container or vehicle, or must be covered by a pest-proof
screen or plastic tarpaulin while in transit to the United States.
(3) All shipments of cantaloupe, honeydew melons, and watermelon
must be labeled in accordance with Sec. 319.56-2(g) of this subpart.
(d) Cantaloupe, netted melon, vegetable melon, winter melon, and
watermelon from Peru. Cantaloupe, netted melon, vegetable melon, and
winter melon (Cucumis melo L. subsp. melo); and watermelon may be
imported into the United States from Peru only in accordance with this
paragraph and all other applicable requirements of this subpart:
(1) The fruit may be imported in commercial shipments only.
(2) The fruit must have been grown in the area of Peru considered
by APHIS to be free of the South American cucurbit fly in accordance
with Sec. 319.56-2(e)(4) of this subpart.
(i) The Departments of Lima, Ica, Arequipa, Moquegua, and Tacna in
Peru are considered free of the South American cucurbit fly.
(ii) All shipments must be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO of Peru that includes a declaration
indicating that the fruit was grown in an area recognized to be free of
the South American cucurbit fly, and upon inspection, was found free of
the gray pineapple mealybug (Dysmicoccus neobrevipes).
(3) The fruit must be packed in an enclosed container or vehicle,
or must be covered by a pest-proof screen or plastic tarpaulin while in
transit to the United States.
(4) All shipments of fruit must be labeled in accordance with Sec.
319.56-2(g) of this subpart, and the boxes in which the fruit is packed
must be labeled ``Not for distribution in HI, PR, VI, or Guam.''
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 0579-0236)
Sec. 319.56-2aa Conditions governing the entry of watermelon, squash,
cucumber, and oriental melon from the Republic of Korea.
Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus), squash (Curcurbita maxima),
cucumber (Cucumis sativus), and oriental melon (Cucumis melo) may be
imported into the United States from the Republic of Korea only in
accordance with this paragraph and all other applicable requirements of
this subpart:
(a) The fruit must be grown in pest-proof greenhouses registered
with the Republic of Korea's national plant protection organization
(NPPO).
(b) The NPPO must inspect and regularly monitor greenhouses for
plant pests. The NPPO must inspect greenhouses and plants, including
fruit, at intervals of no more than 2 weeks, from the time of fruit set
until the end of harvest.
(c) The NPPO must set and maintain McPhail traps (or a similar type
with a protein bait that has been approved for the pests of concern) in
greenhouses from October 1 to April 30. The number of traps must be set
as follows: Two traps for greenhouses smaller than 0.2 hectare in size;
three traps for greenhouses 0.2 to 0.5 hectare; four traps for
greenhouses over 0.5 hectare and up to 1.0 hectare; and for greenhouses
greater than 1 hectare, traps must be placed at a rate of four traps
per hectare.
(d) The NPPO must check all traps once every 2 weeks. If a single
pumpkin fruit fly is captured, that greenhouse will lose its
registration until trapping shows that the infestation has been eradicated.
(e) The fruit may be shipped only from December 1 through April 30.
(f) Each shipment must be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by NPPO, with the following additional declaration:
``The regulated articles in this shipment were grown in registered
greenhouses as specified by 7 CFR 319.56-2aa.''
(g) Each shipment must be protected from pest infestation from
harvest until export. Newly harvested fruit must be covered with
insect-proof mesh or a plastic tarpaulin while moving to the
packinghouse and awaiting packing. Fruit must be packed within 24 hours
of harvesting, in an enclosed container or vehicle or in insect-proof
cartons or cartons covered with insect-proof mesh or plastic tarpaulin,
and then placed in containers for shipment. These safeguards must be
intact when the shipment arrives at the port in the United States.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 0579-0236)
Sec. 319.56-2ll Conditions governing the entry of grapes from the
Republic of Korea.
Grapes (Vitis spp.) may be imported into the United States from the
Republic of Korea under the following conditions:
(a) The fields where the grapes are grown must be inspected during
the growing season by the Republic of Korea's national plant protection
organization (NPPO). The NPPO will inspect 250 grapevines per hectare,
inspecting leaves, stems, and fruit of the vines.
(b) If evidence of Conogethes punctiferalis, Eupoecilia ambiguella,
Sparganothis pilleriana, Stathmopoda auriferella, or Monilinia
fructigena is detected during inspection, the field will immediately be
rejected, and exports from that field will be canceled until visual
inspection of the vines shows that the infestation has been eradicated.
(c) Fruit must be bagged from the time the fruit sets until harvest.
[[Page 65067]]
(d) Each shipment must be inspected by the NPPO before export. For
each shipment, the NPPO must issue a phytosanitary certificate with an
additional declaration stating that the fruit in the shipment was found
free from C. punctiferalis, E. ambiguella, S. pilleriana, S.
auriferella, or M. fructigena, and Nippoptilia vitis.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 0579-0236)
Done in Washington, DC, this 4th day of November 2004.
W. Ron DeHaven,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 04-25042 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}