Few of the world’s inland seas compare more closely to the Great Lakes than the
Baltic Sea. With nine countries along its coastline, the Baltic is an
international waterway vital to the economic, social, and environmental health
of each bordering country. Nowhere is this truer than in Finland, a country with
a long and rich maritime tradition. In September of this year, Dr. Richard
Stewart of the Great Lakes Maritime Research Institute led a U.S. and Canadian
delegation to Finland, to explore these similarities and to establish closer
relationships with representatives from Finnish industry, government, and
academia. Craig Middlebrook, Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation,
Deputy Administrator, was a participant on this week-long trip, which proved to
be a revelation, and he was anxious to share his thoughts with our stakeholders.
The surface area of the Baltic is 35 percent larger than the Great Lakes, but
their water volumes are almost identical. The water of the Great Lakes is fresh,
while that of the Baltic is brackish, but just like the Great Lakes, the Baltic
is home to large cities (6 have metropolitan-areas with over 1 million people),
as well as to environmentally sensitive natural areas. The challenges of
balancing economic needs with environmental concerns in the Gulf of Finland
would be familiar to any Quebecer or Minnesotan. The Baltic Sea is also home to
a “sister” lock system to the Seaway: the Saimaa Canal--a binational waterway
consisting of eight locks between Russia and Finland that links the Finnish
interior to world markets 10 months of the year.
In key ways, however, there are major differences between these vast inland
seas, with the Baltic offering a model that many in the Great Lakes would seek
to emulate. For example, the Baltic Sea is home to a vibrant short sea shipping
industry, with regular feeder line and ferry services linking the major ports
throughout the basin. This regularly scheduled service has been operating for
over 30 years, during which time the short-haul movement of containers over
water has become an integral part of the overall logistical supply-chain
management for the region. The Great Lakes Seaway delegation met with such noted
companies as Unifeeder and Finnlines, which operate Seaway-sized vessels (400-1000 containers) throughout the
Baltic. The prospects for growth in this trade are such that the Port and City
of Helsinki are building a brand new container port (to open in November) in
Vuosaari, 30 miles east of the current downtown port. The Vuosaari port project
is a good example of how government, private industry, and environmental
interests can unite to promote economic growth in the maritime sector, while
doing so in a sustainable (i.e., environmentally sensitive) manner. |
|
Could the Great Lakes follow this model of short sea shipping feeder line
service? After all, the vessel operators in the Baltic face some of the same
challenges we do here: ice conditions, potential competition from surface modes,
and overlapping/abutting regulatory regimes. The delegation found in Finland that to make this service a
reality, favorable public policy has to be joined with clear economic need.
Short sea shipping has a longer history in Europe than on our shores, but this
tradition is kept relevant there by public policy that recognizes a robust
intermodal approach to transportation logistics. One step in that direction for
the Great Lakes would be the waiver of the Harbor Maintenance Tax on non-bulk
cargoes. Moreover, the countries around the Baltic are very experienced in
coordinating and harmonizing national policies that affect maritime commerce,
through such organizations as the Helsinki Commission and the European Union. In
the Great Lakes Seaway System, there have been great strides made in better
coordination between the Canadian and U.S. Governments and between the U.S.
Government and the eight Great Lakes States, but more work is needed.
Another area where the Finns are world leaders is in ice management. With
similar climates, the Baltic and the Great Lakes are waterways where transiting
in ice is a regular occurrence during certain times of the year. At the new Aker
Arctic headquarters in Vuosaari, the delegation learned of the latest
technological advances in the design of ice-class vessels. A meeting with the
Finnish Technical Research Center (VTT) in Helsinki also proved particularly
informative. The Finnish Maritime Administration has been using Automatic
Identification System (AIS) technology since 2002 in its vessel traffic control
centers. Building on this experience, the VTT has developed an innovative system
called “IBNet” (Ice Breaking Net) to better manage the deployment of icebreakers
and improve the transiting of vessels in ice conditions. The IBNet combines
several key technologies, including AIS, weather satellite data, and water flow
measuring devices to provide vessel traffic controllers a comprehensive,
real-time analytical tool that greatly improves their ability to control and
direct vessels in ice. Both Sweden and Finland are currently using IBNet with
their large fleets of icebreakers. You can learn more about this amazing new
system at the FMA’s website (www.fma.fi).
A few paragraphs can hardly do justice to what was learned by spending an
intensive week among the Finnish maritime community. Suffice it to say that Dr.
Stewart is (as he so often is) on to something worthwhile here in taking a
closer look at “how they do it” over in the Baltic Sea. As commercial maritime
navigation continues to evolve on the Great Lakes and in the Seaway, the recent
binational trip to Finland provides several tangible guideposts on how our North
American waterway can develop and improve in the future. |