Return to Table of Contents
 
Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Programs on Indian Lands (15.039)
Dollars and shares using Dominant RUCA

  Rural Urban Total
Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) Percent of Total Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) Percent of Total Total Obligations (FY2002-2004)
Alabama 94,336 100.0 0 0 94,336
Alaska 100,722 8.8 1,048,400 91.2 1,149,122
Arizona 3,809,910 100.0 0 0 3,809,910
California 18,903 2.4 762,043 97.6 780,946
Colorado 320,000 24.7 977,000 75.3 1,297,000
Idaho 0 0 2,579,376 100.0 2,579,376
Maine 100,695 100.0 0 0 100,695
Michigan 4,628,446 99.7 13,000 0.3 4,641,446
Minnesota 718,000 38.1 1,168,800 61.9 1,886,800
Mississippi 141,654 100.0 0 0 141,654
Montana 2,186,781 100.0 0 0 2,186,781
Nebraska 357,859 100.0 0 0 357,859
Nevada 581,621 100.0 0 0 581,621
New Mexico 1,743,120 85.7 291,960 14.3 2,035,080
North Carolina 335,684 100.0 0 0 335,684
North Dakota 1,070,609 100.0 0 0 1,070,609
Oklahoma 190,940 86.4 30,000 13.6 220,940
Oregon 4,321,632 21.0 16,235,846 79.0 20,557,478
Rhode Island 0 0 158,436 100.0 158,436
South Dakota 1,932,981 100.0 0 0 1,932,981
Utah 120,000 100.0 0 0 120,000
Washington 11,549,610 33.4 23,021,601 66.6 34,571,211
Wisconsin 17,449,499 100.0 0 0 17,449,499
Wyoming 329,240 100.0 0 0 329,240
Total 52,102,242 53.0 46,286,462 47.0 98,388,704

For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported."
(GAO-06-294)