"TABLE 4 Percentage of Rejected Replications with Different Levels of Effects and Measurement Error (n = 2,000)",,,,,,,,,,,
,,sP,,0,,,0.3µP,,,0,
,,sI,,0,,,0,,,0.3µI,
error ,s?,,H,Hf,Wn,H,Hf,Wn,H,Hf,Wn
C ,0,,5.8,5.6,4.3,4.4,4.6,3.6,5.6,5.6,4.4
C ,0.2,,12.4,12.2,9.4,11.5,11.6,8.9,11.1,10.6,8.8
C ,0.4,,57,52.7,47.5,58.1,54,48.6,56.2,52.2,48
C ,0.6,,99.4,98.7,98.2,99.2,98.5,97.8,99,98.4,97.9
B,0,,5.6,5.8,4.6,3.2,3.2,2.6,5.5,5.4,4.5
B ,0.2,,12,11.6,9,9.8,9.4,7.4,11.8,11.2,9.3
B ,0.4,,58.4,54.8,49.1,50.2,47,42.3,58.6,53.7,48.4
B ,0.6,,99.2,98.6,98.1,98.8,97.9,97,99.2,98.6,98.1
Key: C = classical measurement errors; B = Berkson measurement errors.,,,,,,,,,,,
Note: The null hypothesis was rejected for large values of the test statistic at 5% level (one-tailed test).,,,,,,,,,,,
