NLM Gateway
A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health
Your Entrance to
Resources from the
National Library of Medicine
    Home      Term Finder      Limits/Settings      Search Details      History      My Locker        About      Help      FAQ    
Skip Navigation Side Barintended for web crawlers only

Predictors of maximal viral suppression in clinical practice.

Moses A, Waring V, Salit I, Logue K, Humar A, Walmsley S; International Conference on AIDS.

Int Conf AIDS. 1998; 12: 341 (abstract no. 22387).

Toronto Hospital, ON, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Following the publication of the International AIDS Society-USA guidelines for antiretroviral (AR) therapy and the availability of viral load (VL) testing many patients (pts) changed their AR therapy in attempts to achieve maximal VL suppression (< 500 copies/ml). OBJECTIVE: To determine what portion of pts in clinical practice achieve maximal VL suppression with a change in therapy in response to a detectable VL. To identify factors which predict which pts reach this goal. METHODS: Retrospective case review of 296 randomly selected pts attending a hospital based tertiary care HIV clinic. Pt data was collected from the time of their first VL determination (available in our centre in 11/96) until 12/97. RESULTS: Of the 296 pts, 48 (16%) had a VL < 500 copies/ml through the entire study period and are excluded. An additional 14 pts with only one VL measure and are also excluded. Of the remaining 234 pts, 185 had a change in therapy in response to a detectable VL and form the cohort for the analysis. Suppression of VL to < 500 copies/ml was achieved in 118 (64%) pts. Univariate analysis demonstrated that pts who achieved maximal viral suppression with a change in therapy were more likely to have a higher mean baseline CD4 count (279 vs 165/mm3, p < .001) and lower mean baseline VL (4.2 log copies/ml vs 4.5 log copies/ml, p = .008). Prior use of PI was strongly predictive of failure to maximally suppress VL (54% vs 75%, p = .006). The number of AR agents changed was not different between the 2 groups (2.27 vs 2.33, p > .05). Logistic regression confirmed baseline CD4 (OR 1.4 per 100/mm3 cell increase, 95% CI 1.13-1.75, p = .003) and prior lack of PI use (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.02-3.80, p = .045) as predictors of maximal suppression. CONCLUSION: Maximal viral suppression was possible for the majority of pts in our out-patient clinic setting. This response was more likely for pts with higher CD4 counts and was less likely for those with PI experience.

Publication Types:
  • Meeting Abstracts
Keywords:
  • Anti-HIV Agents
  • CD4 Lymphocyte Count
  • HIV
  • HIV Infections
  • HIV Protease Inhibitors
  • Humans
  • Viral Load
  • psychology
  • virology
Other ID:
  • 98392524
UI: 102228426

From Meeting Abstracts




Contact Us
U.S. National Library of Medicine |  National Institutes of Health |  Health & Human Services
Privacy |  Copyright |  Accessibility |  Freedom of Information Act |  USA.gov