Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
Programs and Projects
 

Research Project: NUTRITION, EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY, AND SARCOPENIA

Location: Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging

Title: Reliability of Maximal Voluntary Muscle Strength and Power Testing in Older Men

Authors
item Schroeder, E. Todd - KECK SCH MED, USC
item Wang, Ying - KECK SCH MED, USC
item Castaneda-Sceppa, Carmen - TUFTS/HNRCA
item Cloutier, Gregory - TUFTS/HNRCA
item Vallejo, Alberto - KECK SCH MED, USC
item Kawakubo, Miwa - KECK SCH MED, USC
item Jensky, Nicole - KECK SCH MED, USC
item Coomber, Susan - TUFTS/HNRCA
item Azen, Stanley - KECK SCH MED, USC
item Sattler, Fred - KECK SCH MED, USC

Submitted to: Journal of Gerontology
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: July 25, 2006
Publication Date: May 1, 2007
Publisher's URL: http://biomed.gerontologyjournals.org/cgi/content/full/62/5/543?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=40&sortspec=relevance&volume=62&resourcetype=HWCIT
Citation: Schroeder, E., Wang, Y., Castaneda-Sceppa, C., Cloutier, G., Vallejo, A.F., Kawakubo, M., Jensky, N.E., Coomber, S., Azen, S.P., Sattler, F.R. 2007. Reliability of Maximal Voluntary Muscle Strength and Power Testing in Older Men. Journal of Gerontology. 62A(5):543-549.

Interpretive Summary: Measures of maximal voluntary skeletal muscle strength and power are essential indicators of physical function in older adults and important for quantifying outcomes of study interventions. Few studies obtain multiple assessments of maximal voluntary muscle strength and power prior to interventions, which may result in an overestimation of the success of the intervention (resistance training regimens, anabolic drug therapies, etc.) if there is learning or familiarization with the testing procedures. This is of particular importance in older adults where improvements in strength may be small but have functional significance. We, therefore, hypothesized that performing these tests twice within 7 to10 days would demonstrate a greater than 5% increase due to learning and familiarization. Additionally, we sought to compare the test-retest reliability for the same measures conducted at a different university participating in our multicenter study. We found that test-retest measures of maximal voluntary muscle strength and power in older adult men do not differ by more than 2.3% except for leg extension with relatively low coefficients of variation using data collected from three different studies. Our findings suggest that it may not be necessary to perform multiple baseline tests to eliminate or minimize potential test-retest improvement as a result of familiarization and learning of the testing procedures for most exercises but the leg extension exercise may need to be repeated if this is one of the tests selected. Moreover, these findings were similar between two study sites using different equipment, which further supports the reliability of maximal voluntary muscle strength and power testing in older adult men. Lastly, these findings may be of value to geriatric researchers studying sarcopenia since maximal voluntary muscle strength and power are important indicators physical function in older adults.

Technical Abstract: Background Maximal voluntary muscle strength (MVMS) and leg power are important measures of physical function in older adults. We hypothesized that performing these measures twice within 7-10 days would demonstrate a >5% increase due to learning and familiarization of the testing procedures. Methods Data were collected from three studies in older adult men (60-87 yrs) and divided into two cohorts defined by site and type of exercise equipment. MVMS was assessed in 116 subjects using the onerepetition maximum method at pre-entry (test) and baseline (retest) visits for the chest press, latissimus pulldown, leg press, leg flexion, leg extension exercises and unilateral leg extension power. Results Test-retest scores were not different and did not exceed 0.8 +/- 9.0% in Cohort 1 or 2.3 +/- 9.8% in Cohort 2, except for leg extension which improved by 6.6 +/- 14.4% (p<0.009) and 3.4 +/- 6.8% (p<0.016), respectively. Repeat tests were closely correlated with initial tests (all p<0.001). Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0.74 for leg extension power to 0.96 for leg press. Coefficients of variation were <10% (4.2-9.0%) for all exercises except for leg extension power which was 15.5%. Conclusions These findings suggest that it may not be necessary to perform multiple baseline measures to eliminate or minimize potential test-retest improvement as a result of familiarization and learning of the testing procedures with the exception of the leg extension exercises. Moreover, these findings were similar between two study sites using different equipment, which further supports the reliability of MVMS and power testing in older adult men.

   

 
Project Team
Wilhelm, Kathi
Fielding, Roger
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Human Nutrition (107)
 
 
Last Modified: 02/21/2009
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House