Title: William Guse
Author: Azur Moulaert
Last saved by: Bill Pease
Company: Home PC

510-550-6740
William Guse
199 N Church St. , Wailuku, HI 96793 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

Aloha - 

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
William Guse
199 N Church St.
Wailuku, HI 96793

510-550-6740
Lucilene Morandi
Rua Itaocara, 149 Pe Pequeno, Niteroi - RJ,  24240100 Brazil

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lucilene Morandi
Rua Itaocara, 149
Pe Pequeno
Niteroi - RJ 24240100

510-550-6740
Rachael Hawkey
7005 Cherry Meadow dr. , Austin, TX 78745 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rachael Hawkey
7005 Cherry Meadow dr.
Austin, TX 78745

510-550-6740
Eileen Welch
2134-3rd Street , Moline, IL 61265 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Eileen Welch
2134-3rd Street
Moline, IL 61265

510-550-6740
Patricia Ferrara
25241 Crabapple Lane , Bush, LA 70431 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Patricia Ferrara
25241 Crabapple Lane
Bush, LA 70431

510-550-6740
Maria Alicandu-Thurman
56 Indigo Lane , Goose Creek, SC 29445 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Maria Alicandu-Thurman
56 Indigo Lane
Goose Creek, SC 29445

510-550-6740
K Prescott
4495 Holly Avenue , Fairfax, VA 22030 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to ask you to rethink your initial assessment and reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.  Indeed, this is a chemical that should raise far greater concern than it appears to be raising in the EPA at present.

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. (I personally eat a lot of lettuce and drink a lot of water - I'd imagine my exposure is far greater than your estimates!)  Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.  The EPA has a duty to protect people from contaminants and harm - please follow through and do your duty on this item.

Sincerely,
K Prescott
4495 Holly Avenue
Fairfax, VA 22030

510-550-6740
Steven Kennie
10 Wheatfield Lane , West Dennis, MA 02670 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely, Steven Kennie 10 Wheatfield Lane West Dennis, MA 02670

Sincerely,
Steven Kennie
10 Wheatfield Lane
West Dennis, MA 02670

510-550-6740
Brian Krysinski
302 Cedar Lake Rd S # 1 , Minneapolis, MN 55405 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Brian Krysinski
302 Cedar Lake Rd S # 1
Minneapolis, MN 55405

510-550-6740
Karen Michaelis
21115 Uncompahgre Road , Montrose, CO 81401 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Karen Michaelis
21115 Uncompahgre Road
Montrose, CO 81401

510-550-6740
Laura Escude
4028 Perlita Ave #7 , Los Angeles, CA 90039 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Laura Escude
4028 Perlita Ave #7
Los Angeles, CA 90039

510-550-6740
Selece Matthews
5415 N Sheridan Road, #2511 , Chicago, IL 60640 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Selece Matthews
5415 N Sheridan Road, #2511
Chicago, IL 60640

510-550-6740
Bill Liddle
1374 Weast Rd , Schenectady, NY 12306 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Bill Liddle
1374 Weast Rd
Schenectady, NY 12306

510-550-6740
Jack Zakin
6550 Evening St , Worthington, OH 43085 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jack Zakin
6550 Evening St
Worthington, OH 43085

510-550-6740
Rhonda West
608 Hill St. , Copperas Cove, TX 76522 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rhonda West
608 Hill St.
Copperas Cove, TX 76522

510-550-6740
Joseph Severino
31-D Front St. , Healdsburg, CA 95448 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joseph Severino
31-D Front St.
Healdsburg, CA 95448

510-550-6740
tony kosina
6033 dogwood road , wausau, WI 54401 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
tony kosina
6033 dogwood road
wausau, WI 54401

510-550-6740
Joe Edwards
1232 High Peak Ln , Shipman, VA 22971-2340 

November 4, 2008   12:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. This problem needs addressing now.

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joe Edwards
1232 High Peak Ln
Shipman, VA 22971-2340

510-550-6740
Jeff Archuleta
6 Broadway #217 , Denver, CO 80203 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Osama Bin Laden is Dead.

Sincerely,
Jeff Archuleta
6 Broadway #217
Denver, CO 80203

510-550-6740
Victorea Richeson
1750 9th Ave. , Sacramento, CA 958184110 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Victorea Richeson
1750 9th Ave.
Sacramento, CA 95818-4110

510-550-6740
Harry McNally
44 Second St , Fanwood, NJ 070231222 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Harry McNally
44 Second St
Fanwood, NJ 07023-1222

510-550-6740
Jenna DeGuisseppe
15 Tarpon Road , East Quogue, NY 11942 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jenna DeGuisseppe
15 Tarpon Road
East Quogue, NY 11942

510-550-6740
Carol McGeehan
568 West 31st , Holland, MI 49423 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carol McGeehan
568 West 31st
Holland, MI 49423

510-550-6740
Sharon Dawson
967 West Purchase Road , Southbury, CT 6488 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sharon Dawson
967 West Purchase Road
Southbury, CT 6488

510-550-6740
Michelle Hodalj
4144 North Damen Avenue , Chicago, IL 60618 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michelle Hodalj
4144 North Damen Avenue
Chicago, IL 60618

510-550-6740
Paula Lepore
80 Berwick Road , Berwick, ME 03901 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Paula Lepore
80 Berwick Road
Berwick, ME 03901

510-550-6740
kathy mesch
12 via destino , san clemente, CA 92673 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
kathy mesch
12 via destino
san clemente, CA 92673

510-550-6740
Keith Erickson
8 Whitby court , Cherry Hill, NJ 08003 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Keith Erickson
8 Whitby court
Cherry Hill, NJ 08003

510-550-6740
Roxianne Messel
11320 hwy 662 , Lewisport, KY 42351 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Roxianne Messel
11320 hwy 662
Lewisport, KY 42351

510-550-6740
Julie Kennie
10 Wheatfield Lane , West Dennis, MA 02670 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Julie Kennie
10 Wheatfield Lane
West Dennis, MA 02670

510-550-6740
Michael Englert
520 N St SW Apt S-232 , Washington, DC 20024 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michael Englert
520 N St SW Apt S-232
Washington, DC 20024

510-550-6740
stephanie colony
1822 38th Ave. E. , seattle, WA 98112 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
stephanie colony
1822 38th Ave. E.
seattle, WA 98112

510-550-6740
Barbara Urso
Carleton Road 9C, Storrs Mansfield, CT 06268 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara Urso
Carleton Road
9C
Storrs Mansfield, CT 06268

510-550-6740
Glenn Knoblock
1407 Middletree Road , Joliet, IL 60433 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Glenn Knoblock
1407 Middletree Road
Joliet, IL 60433

510-550-6740
Anne O'Sullivan, RSM
P.O.Box 476 424 Frontier, Eagle Butte, SD 57625 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Anne O'Sullivan, RSM
P.O.Box 476
424 Frontier
Eagle Butte, SD 57625

510-550-6740
roger mangrum
21912 via del lago , trabuco canyon, CA 92679 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
roger mangrum
21912 via del lago
trabuco canyon, CA 92679

510-550-6740
robert wolf
1705 gordon dr , naples, FL 34102 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
robert wolf
1705 gordon dr
naples, FL 34102

510-550-6740
cal lash
3145 E Chandler blvd 110-444 , Phoenix, AZ 85048 

November 4, 2008   12:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am a 68 year old conservative Republican that worked in the Perc industry. Bad stuff so I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
cal lash
3145 E Chandler blvd 110-444
Phoenix, AZ 85048

510-550-6740
Theresa Bartoldus
322 Seventh Avenue #1 , Brooklyn, NY 11215 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Theresa Bartoldus
322 Seventh Avenue #1
Brooklyn, NY 11215

510-550-6740
Kelly Moore
1805 Pilot Way , Garland, TX 750401201 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kelly Moore
1805 Pilot Way
Garland, TX 75040-1201

510-550-6740
Lisa Carnicom
3339 38th St W , Billings, MT 59102 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lisa Carnicom
3339 38th St W
Billings, MT 59102

510-550-6740
Cathie Baumgardner
23W470 Greenbriar , Naperville, IL 60540 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Cathie Baumgardner
23W470 Greenbriar
Naperville, IL 60540

510-550-6740
Laura Rost
3386 SE Waverleigh Blvd. #5 , Portland, OR 97202 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Laura Rost
3386 SE Waverleigh Blvd. #5
Portland, OR 97202

510-550-6740
Philip Brandt
308 West 263 St. , Bronx, NY 10471 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Philip Brandt
308 West 263 St.
Bronx, NY 10471

510-550-6740
GERIE GORE
425 East  58th St. , New York, NY 10022 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
GERIE GORE
425 East  58th St.
New York, NY 10022

510-550-6740
Kim Oates
122 Mill Lane , York, ME 03909 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kim Oates
122 Mill Lane
York, ME 03909

510-550-6740
Mayra Luria
2048 sw 28 terrace , Dania, FL 33312 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mayra Luria
2048 sw 28 terrace
Dania, FL 33312

510-550-6740
Keegan Allen
1396 Pond Road , Hinesburg, VT 05461 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Keegan Allen
1396 Pond Road
Hinesburg, VT 05461

510-550-6740
Letitia Noel
55 West Goethe St , Chicago, IL 60610 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Letitia Noel
55 West Goethe St
Chicago, IL 60610

510-550-6740
June Cattell
200 Pineview Dr , West Columbia, SC 29169 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
June Cattell
200 Pineview Dr
West Columbia, SC 29169

510-550-6740
Amy Neff
2003 Island HOme Blvd , Knoxville, TN 37920 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Amy Neff
2003 Island HOme Blvd
Knoxville, TN 37920

510-550-6740
Lauri Provencher
10440 Seabury Lane , Los Angeles, CA 90077 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lauri Provencher
10440 Seabury Lane
Los Angeles, CA 90077

510-550-6740
Lindsay Seidenverg
20245 Moonlight Court , Bend, OR 97702 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Sincerely,
Lindsay Seidenverg
20245 Moonlight Court
Bend, OR 97702

510-550-6740
Lorraine McCoy
14025 N. Sussex Pl. Unit B, Fountain Hills, AZ 852682115 

November 4, 2008   12:10 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

  I am writing to ask you to do all you can to stop more perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies. Its presence is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Even if our water were still meeting EPA standards, we need to prevent more serious contamination. Some states have set stricter standards to ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

It is imperative that the EPA recognize the need to have stricter measures to keep the water safe for citizens and to act immediately before it's too late.

Sincerely,
Lorraine McCoy
14025 N. Sussex Pl.
Unit B
Fountain Hills, AZ 85268-2115

510-550-6740
Jane Cole
925 Hudson Street , Denver, CO 80220 

November 4, 2008   12:09 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jane Cole
925 Hudson Street
Denver, CO 80220

510-550-6740
Jenna Rose
601 W. 11th Ave , Denver, CO 80204 

November 4, 2008   12:09 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jenna Rose
601 W. 11th Ave
Denver, CO 80204

510-550-6740
David Newman
RR #1, Box 172C , Paw Paw, WV 25434 

November 4, 2008   12:09 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David Newman
RR #1, Box 172C
Paw Paw, WV 25434

510-550-6740
Edward Flounoy Jr
2287 Mott Ave. Apt. 3F , Far Rockaway, NY 11691 

November 4, 2008   12:09 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Edward Flounoy Jr
2287 Mott Ave. Apt. 3F
Far Rockaway, NY 11691

510-550-6740
hunter wallof
12340 sir francis drake blvd , point reyes station, CA 94956 

November 4, 2008   12:09 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
hunter wallof
12340 sir francis drake blvd
point reyes station, CA 94956

510-550-6740
ADELAIDE FORREST
3 CANTABERRY LANE , COVENTRY, RI 02816 

November 4, 2008   12:09 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

DON'T LET BUSH ET AL GET AWAY WITH THIS. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sincerely,
ADELAIDE FORREST
3 CANTABERRY LANE
COVENTRY, RI 02816

510-550-6740
Mary Clare Cadieux
1442 W. Fargo, #2e , Chicago, IL 60626 

November 4, 2008   12:09 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Clare Cadieux
1442 W. Fargo, #2e
Chicago, IL 60626

510-550-6740
Pat Ezzo
2904 Hill Rd , Sellersville, PA 18960 

November 4, 2008   12:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Pat Ezzo
2904 Hill Rd
Sellersville, PA 18960

510-550-6740
Rini Twait
1010 E 5th Ave , Longmont, CO 80501 

November 4, 2008   12:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rini Twait
1010 E 5th Ave
Longmont, CO 80501

510-550-6740
Frances Nohling
5N170 Bluff Dr. , St. Charles, IL 60175 

November 4, 2008   12:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Frances Nohling
5N170 Bluff Dr.
St. Charles, IL 60175

510-550-6740
Jon Lopez
1238 N. Winnetka Ave , Dallas, TX 75208 

November 4, 2008   12:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jon Lopez
1238 N. Winnetka Ave
Dallas, TX 75208

510-550-6740
CYNTHIA BROCKWAY
131 MORRIS NW , NEW BRIGHTON, MN 55112 

November 4, 2008   12:07 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
CYNTHIA BROCKWAY
131 MORRIS NW
NEW BRIGHTON, MN 55112

510-550-6740
M. Renee Taylor
12 Custer Drive , Windsor, CT 06095 

November 4, 2008   12:07 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
M. Renee Taylor
12 Custer Drive
Windsor, CT 06095

510-550-6740
Ingrid Albrecht
833 W. Gunnison Street , Chicago, IL 60640 

November 4, 2008   12:07 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act. 

Water is necessary for all life, and if our water sources are contaminated  WHAT does that say for our future, our future generations, and that of all living things?  Please follow the Safe Drinking Water Act and set this protective drinking water standard for perchlorate.

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ingrid Albrecht
833 W. Gunnison Street
Chicago, IL 60640

510-550-6740
jan conley
7177  S  E.  Lake Blvd , Lake  Nebagamon, WI 54849 

November 4, 2008   12:07 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
jan conley
7177  S  E.  Lake Blvd
Lake  Nebagamon, WI 54849

510-550-6740
Jeriene Walberg
3857 Williams Ave. W. , Seattle, WA 98199 

November 4, 2008   12:07 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jeriene Walberg
3857 Williams Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98199

510-550-6740
Karen Killian Baker
117 Jacobs road , Saint Simons Island, GA 31522 

November 4, 2008   12:07 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Karen Killian Baker
117 Jacobs road
Saint Simons Island, GA 31522

510-550-6740
William N Whaley
134 Sutton Road , Ardmore, PA 19003 

November 4, 2008   12:07 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
William N Whaley
134 Sutton Road
Ardmore, PA 19003

510-550-6740
Ruth Van Anden
240 S Water St #6 , E Windsor, CT 06088 

November 4, 2008   12:07 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ruth Van Anden
240 S Water St #6
E Windsor, CT 06088

510-550-6740
Elizabeth Chvilicek
632 ne 43rd terrace , KC, MO 64116 

November 4, 2008   12:07 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Chvilicek
632 ne 43rd terrace
KC, MO 64116

510-550-6740
Gitta Brandt
5515  Charles Street , Bethesda, MD 20814 

November 4, 2008   12:07 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gitta Brandt
5515  Charles Street
Bethesda, MD 20814

510-550-6740
Alicia Fiedler
12325 Limerick Ave. , Austin, TX 78758 

November 4, 2008   12:07 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Alicia Fiedler
12325 Limerick Ave.
Austin, TX 78758

510-550-6740
John Gerth
641 7th St , Lake Oswego, OR 97034 

November 4, 2008   12:07 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
John Gerth
641 7th St
Lake Oswego, OR 97034

510-550-6740
Ricky Setticase
312 W Jefferson St , Gardner, KS 66030 

November 4, 2008   12:06 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Without safe water we as is all life on this planet are dead.  So do you job and make the water safe from the industrial polutents that contaminate the water supply every darn day.  

DO YOU JOBS!!!

Sincerely,
Ricky Setticase
312 W Jefferson St
Gardner, KS 66030

510-550-6740
lillian just
222 indian church road , buffalo, NY 14210 

November 4, 2008   12:06 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
lillian just
222 indian church road
buffalo, NY 14210

510-550-6740
Franklin Jennings Sr
1829 Canal St 1st Floor , Northampton, PA 18067 

November 4, 2008   12:06 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Franklin Jennings Sr
1829 Canal St 1st Floor
Northampton, PA 18067

510-550-6740
Andrew Wadsworth
3810 Lynn Avenue , Reading, PA 19606 

November 4, 2008   12:06 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Andrew Wadsworth
3810 Lynn Avenue
Reading, PA 19606

510-550-6740
Theresa Kelly
280 West 86th St., #4R , New York, NY 10024 

November 4, 2008   12:06 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Theresa Kelly
280 West 86th St., #4R
New York, NY 10024

510-550-6740
Steven Borish
31 Corte Ortega, #5 , Greenbrae, CA 94904 

November 4, 2008   12:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act. Basic responsibility to our citizens and their health demands this. 

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Steven Borish
31 Corte Ortega, #5
Greenbrae, CA 94904

510-550-6740
Kelsey Ann Pitts
711 N.W. 190th Lane , Shoreline, WA 98177 

November 4, 2008   12:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kelsey Ann Pitts
711 N.W. 190th Lane
Shoreline, WA 98177

510-550-6740
Dia Redman
2105 North 1 street , North St Paul, MN 55109 

November 4, 2008   12:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dia Redman
2105 North 1 street
North St Paul, MN 55109

510-550-6740
Margaret Remington
P.O. Box 3405 , Montrose, CO 81402 

November 4, 2008   12:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Margaret Remington
P.O. Box 3405
Montrose, CO 81402

510-550-6740
Robert Harrow
863 e. douglas , bellingham, WA 98229 

November 4, 2008   12:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robert Harrow
863 e. douglas
bellingham, WA 98229

510-550-6740
D Smith
2105 1 street north , North St Paul, MN 55109 

November 4, 2008   12:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
D Smith
2105 1 street north
North St Paul, MN 55109

510-550-6740
Marcelo Acevedo
1577 NW101 ST , Miami, FL 33147 

November 4, 2008   12:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Marcelo Acevedo
1577 NW101 ST
Miami, FL 33147

510-550-6740
mary kappus
71 putnam drive , Carmel, NY 10512 

November 4, 2008   12:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
mary kappus
71 putnam drive
Carmel, NY 10512

510-550-6740
Melinda Horne
P.O. Box 3114 , Idyllwild, CA 92549 

November 4, 2008   12:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Melinda Horne
P.O. Box 3114
Idyllwild, CA 92549

510-550-6740
Karen Lanthier
7704 Stanway Place E , Boca Raton, FL 33433 

November 4, 2008   12:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Karen Lanthier
7704 Stanway Place E
Boca Raton, FL 33433

510-550-6740
Susan C Dawson
17855 W Spring Lake Dr , Renton, WA 98058 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Susan C Dawson
17855 W Spring Lake Dr
Renton, WA 98058

510-550-6740
Tina Mohrfeld
38 Inverness Circle , Marlton, NJ 08053 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tina Mohrfeld
38 Inverness Circle
Marlton, NJ 08053

510-550-6740
fran merker
3235 emmons av , bklyn, NY 11235 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
fran merker
3235 emmons av
bklyn, NY 11235

510-550-6740
Kara Pomeroy
19018 18th Avenue NE , Shoreline, WA 98155 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kara Pomeroy
19018 18th Avenue NE
Shoreline, WA 98155

510-550-6740
Gary Norris
8805 244th St SW , Edmonds, WA 98026 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gary Norris
8805 244th St SW
Edmonds, WA 98026

510-550-6740
gaylene hurley
2158 Terrel Dr , Medford, OR 97501 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
gaylene hurley
2158 Terrel Dr
Medford, OR 97501

510-550-6740
Evelyn Huwich
308 E. Capitol Street N.E., #8 , Washington, DC 20003 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Evelyn Huwich
308 E. Capitol Street N.E., #8
Washington, DC 20003

510-550-6740
kate goodwin
810 Stoddard , missoula, MT 59802 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
kate goodwin
810 Stoddard
missoula, MT 59802

510-550-6740
Cid Martins
viseu , Viseu,  3510 Portugal

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Cid Martins
viseu
Viseu 3510

510-550-6740
Zack Bradford
300 Glenwood Circle #263 , Monterey, CA 93940 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Zack Bradford
300 Glenwood Circle #263
Monterey, CA 93940

510-550-6740
Phil Reser
1225 Terra Nova Blvd. , Pacifica, CA 94044 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Phil Reser
1225 Terra Nova Blvd.
Pacifica, CA 94044

510-550-6740
Stacy Tarkowski
17 Troy St. , West Hartford, CT 06119 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Stacy Tarkowski
17 Troy St.
West Hartford, CT 06119

510-550-6740
Geraldine Tyson
522 16th Avenue , Bethlehem, PA 18018 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Geraldine Tyson
522 16th Avenue
Bethlehem, PA 18018

510-550-6740
Joy Looney
5403 28th Street , Lubbock, TX 79407 

November 4, 2008   12:03 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joy Looney
5403 28th Street
Lubbock, TX 79407

510-550-6740
Rene Ferretti
po box 1471 , Columbia Falls, MT 59912 

November 4, 2008   12:01 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Our Drinking Water

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.

Thank you, Rene Ferretti Montana   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rene Ferretti
po box 1471
Columbia Falls, MT 59912

510-550-6740
Clay Anderson
3017 Santa Carlotta St , La Crescenta, CA 91214 

November 4, 2008   12:01 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Clay Anderson
3017 Santa Carlotta St
La Crescenta, CA 91214

510-550-6740
Kerry Reamer
5445 Miamicrest Drive , Cleves, OH 450029633 

November 4, 2008   12:01 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kerry Reamer
5445 Miamicrest Drive
Cleves, OH 45002-9633

510-550-6740
Krista Lohr
3314 Cheshire Ln. Apt. C , Sarasota, FL 34237 

November 4, 2008   12:01 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Krista Lohr
3314 Cheshire Ln. Apt. C
Sarasota, FL 34237

510-550-6740
Kim Bigley
1202 East 23rd , Houston, TX 77009 

November 4, 2008   12:01 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kim Bigley
1202 East 23rd
Houston, TX 77009

510-550-6740
Jeannie Finlay-Kochanowski
229 Majestic Drive , Toledo, OH 43608 

November 4, 2008   12:01 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jeannie Finlay-Kochanowski
229 Majestic Drive
Toledo, OH 43608

510-550-6740
Gail Whitten
417 E Duffy , Norman, OK 73071 

November 4, 2008   12:01 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gail Whitten
417 E Duffy
Norman, OK 73071

510-550-6740
Lynn Fonseca
3457 Kaimuki Avenue , Honolulu, HI 96816 

November 4, 2008   12:01 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lynn Fonseca
3457 Kaimuki Avenue
Honolulu, HI 96816

510-550-6740
Melinda Broadwater
4217 SE 15th Ave , Portland, OR 97202 

November 4, 2008   12:01 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Melinda Broadwater
4217 SE 15th Ave
Portland, OR 97202

510-550-6740
Nancy Lion-Storm
P.O. Box 0074 , Lafayette, CA 94549 

November 4, 2008   12:00 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

In God's name, you must reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nancy Lion-Storm
P.O. Box 0074
Lafayette, CA 94549

510-550-6740
Sorina Eftim
607 9th Street , Laurel, MD 20707 

November 4, 2008   12:00 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations, such as  pregnant women, infants, and small children, are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sorina Eftim
607 9th Street
Laurel, MD 20707

510-550-6740
Barbara Rystrom
138 Summerall Court , Aiken, SC 29801 

November 4, 2008   12:00 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara Rystrom
138 Summerall Court
Aiken, SC 29801

510-550-6740
Susan Nogare
41228 Alline Street , Fremont, CA 94538 

November 4, 2008   12:00 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Susan Nogare
41228 Alline Street
Fremont, CA 94538

510-550-6740
Tatyana Kostrova
4322 Spencer , Houston, TX 77007 

November 4, 2008   12:00 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tatyana Kostrova
4322 Spencer
Houston, TX 77007

510-550-6740
Michael McGuire
18 Chaumont , Mission Viejo, CA 92692 

November 4, 2008   12:00 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michael McGuire
18 Chaumont
Mission Viejo, CA 92692

510-550-6740
Jens Hansen
3917 N Bryce Canyon Place , Meridian, ID 83646 

November 4, 2008   12:00 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jens Hansen
3917 N Bryce Canyon Place
Meridian, ID 83646

510-550-6740
Melissa Goldberg RN
29621 K. St. , Ocean Park, WA 98640 

November 4, 2008   11:59 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Melissa Goldberg RN
29621 K. St.
Ocean Park, WA 98640

510-550-6740
Mary Elizabeth Leach
5152 La Vista Court , Los Angeles, CA 90004 

November 4, 2008   11:59 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Your job is to protect us, the people, from harm, not to protect businesses or a polluting defense department.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Mary Elizabeth Leach
5152 La Vista Court
Los Angeles, CA 90004

510-550-6740
Scott Bernstein
10 Jones St. Apt. 4H, New York, NY 10014 

November 4, 2008   11:59 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Scott Bernstein
10 Jones St.
Apt. 4H
New York, NY 10014

510-550-6740
Laura Small
Po Box 1807 , Truckee, CA 96160 

November 4, 2008   11:59 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Laura Small
Po Box 1807
Truckee, CA 96160

510-550-6740
Noreen Weeden
493 Vermont St , San Francisco, CA 94107 

November 4, 2008   11:59 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Noreen Weeden
493 Vermont St
San Francisco, CA 94107

510-550-6740
Jonas Wickham
8501 Ridpath Drive , Los Angeles, CA 90046 

November 4, 2008   11:59 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jonas Wickham
8501 Ridpath Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90046

510-550-6740
Magoo Shoulderblade
2118 Central, S.E., #119 , Albuquerque, NM 87106 

November 4, 2008   11:59 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Magoo Shoulderblade
2118 Central, S.E., #119
Albuquerque, NM 87106

510-550-6740
joan richardson
38 pheasant run , voorheesville, NY 12186 

November 4, 2008   11:59 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
joan richardson
38 pheasant run
voorheesville, NY 12186

510-550-6740
John Kunick
20630 Jacaranda Road , Miami, FL 331892410 

November 4, 2008   11:59 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
John Kunick
20630 Jacaranda Road
Miami, FL 33189-2410

510-550-6740
David Giantomasi
26 West Sage Creek Place , The Woodlands, TX 77382 

November 4, 2008   11:59 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David Giantomasi
26 West Sage Creek Place
The Woodlands, TX 77382

510-550-6740
Kathleen Finnerty
4319 NW 70th Terrace , Gainesville, FL 32606 

November 4, 2008   11:59 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kathleen Finnerty
4319 NW 70th Terrace
Gainesville, FL 32606

510-550-6740
Shane Nodurft
4025 North Pulaski Road , Chicago, IL 60641 

November 4, 2008   11:57 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Shane Nodurft
4025 North Pulaski Road
Chicago, IL 60641

510-550-6740
Mary Harp
120 washington st. , Hartford, MI 49057 

November 4, 2008   11:57 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Harp
120 washington st.
Hartford, MI 49057

510-550-6740
rosemarie shishkin
411-44th ave , san francisco, CA 94121 

November 4, 2008   11:57 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
rosemarie shishkin
411-44th ave
san francisco, CA 94121

510-550-6740
Roseann Martinez
55 Park Avenue apt 5, Bloomfield, NJ 07003 

November 4, 2008   11:57 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Roseann Martinez
55 Park Avenue
apt 5
Bloomfield, NJ 07003

510-550-6740
Mike Meyer
7435 Eigleberry Street , Gilroy, CA 95020 

November 4, 2008   11:57 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mike Meyer
7435 Eigleberry Street
Gilroy, CA 95020

510-550-6740
Richard Surwillo
1205 E 6Th St. #329 , Los Angeles, CA 90021 

November 4, 2008   11:57 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Richard Surwillo
1205 E 6Th St. #329
Los Angeles, CA 90021

510-550-6740
Patricia Scully
3607 Chadsworth Way , Sacramento, CA 95821 

November 4, 2008   11:57 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Patricia Scully
3607 Chadsworth Way
Sacramento, CA 95821

510-550-6740
Linda Nerad
21 W Chestnut St , Chicago, IL 60610 

November 4, 2008   11:57 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Linda Nerad
21 W Chestnut St
Chicago, IL 60610

510-550-6740
Annemarie Prairie
4265 Darley Ave , BOULDER, CO 80305 

November 4, 2008   11:56 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Annemarie Prairie
4265 Darley Ave
BOULDER, CO 80305

510-550-6740
Geoffrey Simonds
840 Ramshorn Dr , Estes Park, CO 80517 

November 4, 2008   11:56 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Geoffrey Simonds
840 Ramshorn Dr
Estes Park, CO 80517

510-550-6740
Jill Sheridan
1221 Chippewa Street , Jupiter, FL 33458 

November 4, 2008   11:56 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jill Sheridan
1221 Chippewa Street
Jupiter, FL 33458

510-550-6740
Tamara Logan
146 madison ave #3 , redwood city, CA 94061 

November 4, 2008   11:56 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tamara Logan
146 madison ave #3
redwood city, CA 94061

510-550-6740
Gerald Smith
723 S. Ravencrest Ave. , Bloomington, IN 47401 

November 4, 2008   11:55 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gerald Smith
723 S. Ravencrest Ave.
Bloomington, IN 47401

510-550-6740
GAYLE Graziano
243 BIG SKY DR , HIAWASSEE,, GA 30546 

November 4, 2008   11:55 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
GAYLE Graziano
243 BIG SKY DR
HIAWASSEE,, GA 30546

510-550-6740
Harry Squires
516 S. Francisca Ave. , Redondo Beach, CA 90277 

November 4, 2008   11:55 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

Please reverse the EPA's regulation for perchlorate.   

Data is in?Perchlorate contamination is dangerous for our population. 

Your limite of 15 parts per billion does not take into account that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. And it doesn't include the safety meaures that many states have found necessary to protect the health of their populations. 

Please put the health of our citizens first, as the law requires you to.

Sincerely,
Harry Squires
516 S. Francisca Ave.
Redondo Beach, CA 90277

510-550-6740
Helen Faller
333 Gerritt Street , Philadelphia, PA 19147 

November 4, 2008   11:55 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Helen Faller
333 Gerritt Street
Philadelphia, PA 19147

510-550-6740
Nancy Pernell
PO Box 189 , Shasta, CA 96087 

November 4, 2008   11:55 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nancy Pernell
PO Box 189
Shasta, CA 96087

510-550-6740
Terri Gedo
7521 McConnell Avenue , Los Angeles, CA 90045 

November 4, 2008   11:55 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Terri Gedo
7521 McConnell Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90045

510-550-6740
Anne Swanson
1458 Ridgeley Drive , Campbell, CA 950080706 

November 4, 2008   11:55 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Anne Swanson
1458 Ridgeley Drive
Campbell, CA 95008-0706

510-550-6740
Julia Rutledge
4037 Little Rock Dr. , Antelope, CA 95843 

November 4, 2008   11:55 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Julia Rutledge
4037 Little Rock Dr.
Antelope, CA 95843

510-550-6740
M Wollerman
63 Hill St , Wood Ridge, NJ 07075 

November 4, 2008   11:55 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
M Wollerman
63 Hill St
Wood Ridge, NJ 07075

510-550-6740
Ashley Smith
110 Plain Street , Pembroke, MA 02359 

November 4, 2008   11:55 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ashley Smith
110 Plain Street
Pembroke, MA 02359

510-550-6740
Doreen Tignanelli
29 Colburn Drive , Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 

November 4, 2008   11:55 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Doreen Tignanelli
29 Colburn Drive
Poughkeepsie, NY 12603

510-550-6740
illisa kelman
69 Foster Street , New Haven, CT 06511 

November 4, 2008   11:55 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
illisa kelman
69 Foster Street
New Haven, CT 06511

510-550-6740
peter solt
2301 Ravine Way , glenview, IL 60025 

November 4, 2008   11:54 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

ANOTHER  DUMBFUCK PROPOSAL FROM ANOTHER BUSH SHITHEAD!

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
peter solt
2301 Ravine Way
glenview, IL 60025

510-550-6740
David Swanson
1458 Ridgeley Drive , Campbell, CA 950080706 

November 4, 2008   11:54 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David Swanson
1458 Ridgeley Drive
Campbell, CA 95008-0706

510-550-6740
Jennifer O'Brien
6011 Acorn St. , Houston, TX 77092 

November 4, 2008   11:54 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jennifer O'Brien
6011 Acorn St.
Houston, TX 77092

510-550-6740
Kristen Wright
1707 4th st , jackson, MI 49203 

November 4, 2008   11:54 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kristen Wright
1707 4th st
jackson, MI 49203

510-550-6740
Michelle O'Reilly
184 Dykeman Rd , Carmel, NY 10512 

November 4, 2008   11:54 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michelle O'Reilly
184 Dykeman Rd
Carmel, NY 10512

510-550-6740
Tasha Robinson
9217 SW Cascara Lane , Tualatin, OR 97062 

November 4, 2008   11:54 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tasha Robinson
9217 SW Cascara Lane
Tualatin, OR 97062

510-550-6740
elka brandt
336 central park west 11e, new york, NY 10025 

November 4, 2008   11:54 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
elka brandt
336 central park west
11e
new york, NY 10025

510-550-6740
Eleanor Brennan
9403 Aldabra Ct , San Diego, CA 92129 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Eleanor Brennan
9403 Aldabra Ct
San Diego, CA 92129

510-550-6740
Kristin Scott
8 High Street , Felton, PA 17322 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kristin Scott
8 High Street
Felton, PA 17322

510-550-6740
Bobbi Seymour-Linder
308 Goodrich RD , Bellevue, OH 44811 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to ask you to reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Bobbi Seymour-Linder
308 Goodrich RD
Bellevue, OH 44811

510-550-6740
susan may
1100 doran ct , crescent city, ca, CA 95531 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

Please help keep our water clean. I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
susan may
1100 doran ct
crescent city, ca, CA 95531

510-550-6740
Andrea Dunlay
161 Prospect Blvd , Waterloo, IA 50701 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Andrea Dunlay
161 Prospect Blvd
Waterloo, IA 50701

510-550-6740
ROBERT CLINTON
39 LAKESIDE DR. , HIGHLAND MILLS, NY 10930 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
ROBERT CLINTON
39 LAKESIDE DR.
HIGHLAND MILLS, NY 10930

510-550-6740
larry fleischman
30 canal st , nyc, NY 10002 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
larry fleischman
30 canal st
nyc, NY 10002

510-550-6740
Pam Smith
4140 Amber Hill # 273 , Creston, CA 93432 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Pam Smith
4140 Amber Hill # 273
Creston, CA 93432

510-550-6740
Judith Edwards
737 Franklin Avenue , "Winthrop Harbor,", IL 60096 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Judith Edwards
737 Franklin Avenue
"Winthrop Harbor,", IL 60096

510-550-6740
Daniel Stansloski
260 Goodveiw Ave Apt. 3, Akron, OH 44305 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Daniel Stansloski
260 Goodveiw Ave
Apt. 3
Akron, OH 44305

510-550-6740
Mark Edgren
900 Cragmonet Avenue , Berkeley, CA 94708 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mark Edgren
900 Cragmonet Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94708

510-550-6740
Daniel Shively
779 White Farm Road , Indiana, PA 15701 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Daniel Shively
779 White Farm Road
Indiana, PA 15701

510-550-6740
Matt Martorella
14445 127th Lane NE  #S-13 , Kirkland, WA 98034 

November 4, 2008   11:53 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Matt Martorella
14445 127th Lane NE  #S-13
Kirkland, WA 98034

510-550-6740
Thomas Fedorka
7472 Gordon Loop , Brooksville, FL 34601 

November 4, 2008   11:52 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Thomas Fedorka
7472 Gordon Loop
Brooksville, FL 34601

510-550-6740
Elaine Fox-Haney
2105 Sandford Rd. , Lakeland, FL 33801 

November 4, 2008   11:52 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Elaine Fox-Haney
2105 Sandford Rd.
Lakeland, FL 33801

510-550-6740
J White
1118 s I st , Tacoma, WA 98405 

November 4, 2008   11:52 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
J White
1118 s I st
Tacoma, WA 98405

510-550-6740
Barry Frauman
451 Melrose #209, Chicago, IL 60657=3821 

November 4, 2008   11:52 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barry Frauman
451 Melrose
#209
Chicago, IL 60657=3821

510-550-6740
Dana Stewart
5669 Amaya Drive , La Mesa, CA 91942 

November 4, 2008   11:52 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dana Stewart
5669 Amaya Drive
La Mesa, CA 91942

510-550-6740
JOAN Scocozza
1344 Normandy Blvd , Holiday, FL 34691 

November 4, 2008   11:52 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
JOAN Scocozza
1344 Normandy Blvd
Holiday, FL 34691

510-550-6740
Luci Evanston
752 Glenview Dr #209 , San Bruno, CA 94066 

November 4, 2008   11:52 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Luci Evanston
752 Glenview Dr #209
San Bruno, CA 94066

510-550-6740
Mr. S. Spacek
925 Hwy 80 , San Marcos, TX 78666 

November 4, 2008   11:52 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mr. S. Spacek
925 Hwy 80
San Marcos, TX 78666

510-550-6740
Bert Adams
723 Nw 96Th St , Vancouver, WA 98665 

November 4, 2008   11:52 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Bert Adams
723 Nw 96Th St
Vancouver, WA 98665

510-550-6740
Robin Wilson
P. O. Box 563 , Hawley, PA 18428 

November 4, 2008   11:52 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robin Wilson
P. O. Box 563
Hawley, PA 18428

510-550-6740
Patricia Crimmins
2848 Raintree Ct , Sierra Vista, AZ 85650 

November 4, 2008   11:52 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Patricia Crimmins
2848 Raintree Ct
Sierra Vista, AZ 85650

510-550-6740
Barbara Henderson
PO Box 336 , Paicines, CA 95043 

November 4, 2008   11:51 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara Henderson
PO Box 336
Paicines, CA 95043

510-550-6740
ED SCHLEICHER
7700 SW GARDEN HOME RD. , PORTLAND, OR 97223 

November 4, 2008   11:51 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
ED SCHLEICHER
7700 SW GARDEN HOME RD.
PORTLAND, OR 97223

510-550-6740
Megan Crotty
6091 Providence Drive , Pleasant Garden, NC 27313 

November 4, 2008   11:51 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Megan Crotty
6091 Providence Drive
Pleasant Garden, NC 27313

510-550-6740
Barbara Cain
2385 Shoreside Court , Santa Clara, CA 95054 

November 4, 2008   11:51 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara Cain
2385 Shoreside Court
Santa Clara, CA 95054

510-550-6740
Jerome Parsons
18788 Favre Ridge Rd , Los Gatos, CA 95033 

November 4, 2008   11:51 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jerome Parsons
18788 Favre Ridge Rd
Los Gatos, CA 95033

510-550-6740
Todd Hildebrandt
PO Box 189 , Elmira, OR 97437-0189 

November 4, 2008   11:50 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

You must take action to protect the people of this nation from this dangerous pollutant or you will be derelict in your duty.

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Todd Hildebrandt
PO Box 189
Elmira, OR 97437-0189

510-550-6740
marly Wexler
4314 1/2 Campus Ave. , San Diego, CA 92103 

November 4, 2008   11:50 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
marly Wexler
4314 1/2 Campus Ave.
San Diego, CA 92103

510-550-6740
Judith Lachat
29 Abrew Street , Bay Shore, NY 11706 

November 4, 2008   11:50 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Judith Lachat
29 Abrew Street
Bay Shore, NY 11706

510-550-6740
Craig Mann
5109 Shagbark Dr , Durham, NC 27703 

November 4, 2008   11:50 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Craig Mann
5109 Shagbark Dr
Durham, NC 27703

510-550-6740
Clare Welter
1523 Laurel Avenue , Saint Paul, MN 55104-6739 

November 4, 2008   11:50 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Clare Welter
1523 Laurel Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-6739

510-550-6740
Virgil Hutson
1329 Mayfield Ln , Chattanooga, TN 37343 

November 4, 2008   11:50 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Virgil Hutson
1329 Mayfield Ln
Chattanooga, TN 37343

510-550-6740
MJ Faris
P.O. Box 81117 , san marino, CA 91118 

November 4, 2008   11:50 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
MJ Faris
P.O. Box 81117
san marino, CA 91118

510-550-6740
David Walsh
1463 Portland Avenue Apartment #2, St. Paul, MN 55104 

November 4, 2008   11:50 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David Walsh
1463 Portland Avenue
Apartment #2
St. Paul, MN 55104

510-550-6740
Don and Mrs. Joyce Faulk
6103 Abilene Trail , Austin, TX 78749 

November 4, 2008   11:50 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Don and Mrs. Joyce Faulk
6103 Abilene Trail
Austin, TX 78749

510-550-6740
Don Lichtenberg
715 S Fess Ave , Bloomington, IN 47401 

November 4, 2008   11:49 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Don Lichtenberg
715 S Fess Ave
Bloomington, IN 47401

510-550-6740
Paul Busch
1523 Laurel Avenue , Saint Paul, MN 551046739 

November 4, 2008   11:49 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Paul Busch
1523 Laurel Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-6739

510-550-6740
Gilliam Swink Hicks
137 Hickory Glen , Madison, MS 39110 

November 4, 2008   11:49 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gilliam Swink Hicks
137 Hickory Glen
Madison, MS 39110

510-550-6740
denise kotrla
11316 jollyville rd. , austin, TX 78759 

November 4, 2008   11:49 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
denise kotrla
11316 jollyville rd.
austin, TX 78759

510-550-6740
Robert Leonard
2586 Selleck Ave. , New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168 

November 4, 2008   11:48 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robert Leonard
2586 Selleck Ave.
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168

510-550-6740
TOM BENGAFF
81 RIVERVALE RD , RIVERVALE, NJ 07675 

November 4, 2008   11:48 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
TOM BENGAFF
81 RIVERVALE RD
RIVERVALE, NJ 07675

510-550-6740
Kristjan Thompson
2507-A Dickinson Ave. , Greenville, NC 27834 

November 4, 2008   11:48 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kristjan Thompson
2507-A Dickinson Ave.
Greenville, NC 27834

510-550-6740
Chaz Groves
1910 Langton Street , Cambria, CA 93428 

November 4, 2008   11:47 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Chaz Groves
1910 Langton Street
Cambria, CA 93428

510-550-6740
Isabella Randazzo
730 Hlltop Court , Coram, NY 11727 

November 4, 2008   11:47 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Isabella Randazzo
730 Hlltop Court
Coram, NY 11727

510-550-6740
Dawn Higgins
178 1/2 4th Street , Fond du Lac, WI 54935 

November 4, 2008   11:47 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dawn Higgins
178 1/2 4th Street
Fond du Lac, WI 54935

510-550-6740
Kathy Flocco-McMaster
802 Dover Street , Cherry Hill, NJ 08002 

November 4, 2008   11:47 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kathy Flocco-McMaster
802 Dover Street
Cherry Hill, NJ 08002

510-550-6740
erik shearer
347 94th st , Brooklyn, NY 11209 

November 4, 2008   11:46 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
erik shearer
347 94th st
Brooklyn, NY 11209

510-550-6740
laurel wood ramsden
107 fegley st , mont clare, PA 19453 

November 4, 2008   11:46 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
laurel wood ramsden
107 fegley st
mont clare, PA 19453

510-550-6740
James Gonsman
P. O. Box 125 17010 Burl Lane, Occidental, CA 954650125 

November 4, 2008   11:46 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
James Gonsman
P. O. Box 125
17010 Burl Lane
Occidental, CA 95465-0125

510-550-6740
Carmel Katich
2491 Center Ave. , Alliance, OH 44601 

November 4, 2008   11:46 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carmel Katich
2491 Center Ave.
Alliance, OH 44601

510-550-6740
Dorota Goczal
884 Tallgrass Dr , Bartlett, IL 60103 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dorota Goczal
884 Tallgrass Dr
Bartlett, IL 60103

510-550-6740
Donna Kennett
150 Brand Rd. , Toms River, NJ 08753 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Donna Kennett
150 Brand Rd.
Toms River, NJ 08753

510-550-6740
Alyson Mangini
30 E Concord Street, #23 , Boston, MA 02118 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Alyson Mangini
30 E Concord Street, #23
Boston, MA 02118

510-550-6740
Brian Fourman
1019 west lake , chicago, IL 60607 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Brian Fourman
1019 west lake
chicago, IL 60607

510-550-6740
Piper Lillehoff MD
146 Coral Rose , Irvine, CA 92603 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Piper Lillehoff MD
146 Coral Rose
Irvine, CA 92603

510-550-6740
Mark Levy
Po Biox 559 , Felton, CA 95018 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mark Levy
Po Biox 559
Felton, CA 95018

510-550-6740
Jean Boydston
3035 E. Mabel St. , Tucson, AZ 85716 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jean Boydston
3035 E. Mabel St.
Tucson, AZ 85716

510-550-6740
karen dinkins
1624 northline dr , north little rock, AR 72116 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
karen dinkins
1624 northline dr
north little rock, AR 72116

510-550-6740
Alan Schenck
1784 Kimberly Drive , Sunnyvale, CA 94087 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Alan Schenck
1784 Kimberly Drive
Sunnyvale, CA 94087

510-550-6740
Richard Rawson
2781 Land Park Drive , Sacramento, CA 95818 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Richard Rawson
2781 Land Park Drive
Sacramento, CA 95818

510-550-6740
Kathleen Patterson
P.O. Box 215 , Magee, MS 39111 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kathleen Patterson
P.O. Box 215
Magee, MS 39111

510-550-6740
Lauren Kramer
1353 Walnut Lane , Macungie, PA 18062 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lauren Kramer
1353 Walnut Lane
Macungie, PA 18062

510-550-6740
Nancy Grant
R.R. 3 Box 348 , Sullivan, IL 61951 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nancy Grant
R.R. 3 Box 348
Sullivan, IL 61951

510-550-6740
Ginny McCormick
915 Menlo Avenue Apt A , Menlo Park, CA 94025 

November 4, 2008   11:45 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ginny McCormick
915 Menlo Avenue Apt A
Menlo Park, CA 94025

510-550-6740
Mike and Barbara Sentovich
11642 Wallingsford Rd. , Los Alamitos, CA 90720 

November 4, 2008   11:43 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

Please reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mike and Barbara Sentovich
11642 Wallingsford Rd.
Los Alamitos, CA 90720

510-550-6740
Cory Harden
Box 10265 , Hilo, HI 96721 

November 4, 2008   11:43 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

Please protect our water and food.

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Cory Harden
Box 10265
Hilo, HI 96721

510-550-6740
Robert Maassen
1186 Midway Ct , Novato, CA 94947 

November 4, 2008   11:43 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robert Maassen
1186 Midway Ct
Novato, CA 94947

510-550-6740
M.A. Roberts
2130 Fulton , San Francisco, CA 94117 

November 4, 2008   11:43 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
M.A. Roberts
2130 Fulton
San Francisco, CA 94117

510-550-6740
Charmagne Loveless
12218 W. Saint Martins Rd , Franklin, WI 53132 

November 4, 2008   11:43 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Charmagne Loveless
12218 W. Saint Martins Rd
Franklin, WI 53132

510-550-6740
Marin Kress
133 Cypress St , Brookline, MA 02445 

November 4, 2008   11:43 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Marin Kress
133 Cypress St
Brookline, MA 02445

510-550-6740
Joe Johnson
168 Village Crest , Avila Beach, CA 93424 

November 4, 2008   11:43 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joe Johnson
168 Village Crest
Avila Beach, CA 93424

510-550-6740
Steven Tempelman
9612 Aspen Hill Cir , Lone Tree, CO 80124 

November 4, 2008   11:42 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Steven Tempelman
9612 Aspen Hill Cir
Lone Tree, CO 80124

510-550-6740
diana suzuki
1605 manzanita ave , chico, CA 95926 

November 4, 2008   11:42 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
diana suzuki
1605 manzanita ave
chico, CA 95926

510-550-6740
Mary Grant
222 Colony Point Road , Williamsburg, VA 23185 

November 4, 2008   11:42 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Grant
222 Colony Point Road
Williamsburg, VA 23185

510-550-6740
Daniel Earle
50498 Monroe , Canton, MI 48188 

November 4, 2008   11:42 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Daniel Earle
50498 Monroe
Canton, MI 48188

510-550-6740
mauro oliveira
box 225 , Montgomery Creek, CA 96065 

November 4, 2008   11:42 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
mauro oliveira
box 225
Montgomery Creek, CA 96065

510-550-6740
Ben Woitena
"1302 Waugh Drive, PMB 259" , Houston, TX 77019 

November 4, 2008   11:42 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ben Woitena
"1302 Waugh Drive, PMB 259"
Houston, TX 77019

510-550-6740
Beth Cleaveland
418 Hamlet Ave. , Carolina Beach, NC 28428 

November 4, 2008   11:42 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Beth Cleaveland
418 Hamlet Ave.
Carolina Beach, NC 28428

510-550-6740
chris brazis
10 appleton apt a , San Francisco, CA 94110 

November 4, 2008   11:42 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
chris brazis
10 appleton apt a
San Francisco, CA 94110

510-550-6740
Sara Lincoln
1611 Harbor Road , Shelburne, VT 05482 

November 4, 2008   11:42 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sara Lincoln
1611 Harbor Road
Shelburne, VT 05482

510-550-6740
Nan Scott
3565 Chestnut Drive , Norco, CA 92860 

November 4, 2008   11:42 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nan Scott
3565 Chestnut Drive
Norco, CA 92860

510-550-6740
joseph rodgers   jr.
4348a  w.  valencia  rd. , tucson, AZ 85746 

November 4, 2008   11:40 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.Actually The Safe Water Drinking Act is lax in itself as our clean streams and ground waters are being polluted to the extent of extinction due to the perverse rulings of the EPA in order to satisfy the Bush Administration.Living in Tucson AZ.,one realizes the problems with Perchlorlate pollution as we had seven wells polluted in the area of the Huges, now Ratheon,plant where Govt.projects are worked on.When do you people plan to do what you always have done since your founding.These past eight years have put a dark spot on your history and your political ethics as your job is to protect the people by stoping the polluters and get rich riff-raff that come into power.You have done a piss poor job for the people.Sold out to Bush and his insane ideas.You are responsible to many families across this nation today and in the future.DO YOUR JOB!   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
joseph rodgers   jr.
4348a  w.  valencia  rd.
tucson, AZ 85746

510-550-6740
Ann Vinup
1747 Wentworth Avenue , Baltilmore, MD 21234 

November 4, 2008   11:40 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ann Vinup
1747 Wentworth Avenue
Baltilmore, MD 21234

510-550-6740
Mary Moycik
1160 Greenwich St. #201 , San Francisco, CA 94109 

November 4, 2008   11:40 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Moycik
1160 Greenwich St. #201
San Francisco, CA 94109

510-550-6740
Maureen Barillaro
55 Craigie st #1 , Somerville, MA 02143 

November 4, 2008   11:40 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Maureen Barillaro
55 Craigie st #1
Somerville, MA 02143

510-550-6740
William Houdek
HC7, Box 184 , Payson, AZ 85541 

November 4, 2008   11:40 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
William Houdek
HC7, Box 184
Payson, AZ 85541

510-550-6740
Frances Sawyer
1820 Bern Street , Reading, PA 19604 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Frances Sawyer
1820 Bern Street
Reading, PA 19604

510-550-6740
Denise De Cunzo
1625 N. Fairview Street , Burbank, CA 91505 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Denise De Cunzo
1625 N. Fairview Street
Burbank, CA 91505

510-550-6740
Kelly Cleveland
4775 Argonne St , Denver, CO 80249 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kelly Cleveland
4775 Argonne St
Denver, CO 80249

510-550-6740
sue ann petrie
306 cyprus dr , cocoa beach, FL 32931 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
sue ann petrie
306 cyprus dr
cocoa beach, FL 32931

510-550-6740
Mary Huddleston
4740 N. Malden , Chicago, IL 60640 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Huddleston
4740 N. Malden
Chicago, IL 60640

510-550-6740
pat henry
147 w 15  st , deer park, NY 11729 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
pat henry
147 w 15  st
deer park, NY 11729

510-550-6740
renee milburn
po box 31 , wrightwood, CA 92397 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
renee milburn
po box 31
wrightwood, CA 92397

510-550-6740
Barbara English
7 Sunbury Drive , Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara English
7 Sunbury Drive
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656

510-550-6740
Jennifer Daniels
1038 Firwood Dr , Pgh, PA 15243 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Daniels
1038 Firwood Dr
Pgh, PA 15243

510-550-6740
joel henry
14620 garrett ave. #104 , apple valley, MN 55124 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
joel henry
14620 garrett ave. #104
apple valley, MN 55124

510-550-6740
Gayle Doukas
8520 W. Red Wing Dr. , Franklin, WI 53132 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gayle Doukas
8520 W. Red Wing Dr.
Franklin, WI 53132

510-550-6740
Peter Rawlings
5 Burnham Rd , No Billerica, MA 01862 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Peter Rawlings
5 Burnham Rd
No Billerica, MA 01862

510-550-6740
David B. Tumarkin
38 Smith Avenue , White Plains, NY 106051119 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David B. Tumarkin
38 Smith Avenue
White Plains, NY 10605-1119

510-550-6740
Bill Rivers
4011 Florentine Dr , Longmont, CO 80503 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Bill Rivers
4011 Florentine Dr
Longmont, CO 80503

510-550-6740
Maureen Besancon
4329 Ensenada Dr. , Woodland Hills, CA 91364 

November 4, 2008   11:39 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Maureen Besancon
4329 Ensenada Dr.
Woodland Hills, CA 91364

510-550-6740
Patricia Bitner
1925 E. 26th Ave , Eugene, OR 97403 

November 4, 2008   11:38 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Patricia Bitner
1925 E. 26th Ave
Eugene, OR 97403

510-550-6740
Jean Craig
4743 Merida Ave. , Fort Worth, TX 761153008 

November 4, 2008   11:38 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jean Craig
4743 Merida Ave.
Fort Worth, TX 76115-3008

510-550-6740
Flynn Gourley
18th St , San Francisco, CA 94110 

November 4, 2008   11:38 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you to reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Flynn Gourley
18th St
San Francisco, CA 94110

510-550-6740
jenny turba
4505 s hale ave , tampa, FL 33611 

November 4, 2008   11:38 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
jenny turba
4505 s hale ave
tampa, FL 33611

510-550-6740
Kevin Vaught
505 Oak Forest Circle , Antioch, TN 37013 

November 4, 2008   11:38 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kevin Vaught
505 Oak Forest Circle
Antioch, TN 37013

510-550-6740
Margaret Whittemore
24 Taylor Road , Sudbury, MA 01776 

November 4, 2008   11:38 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Margaret Whittemore
24 Taylor Road
Sudbury, MA 01776

510-550-6740
M.P. Montgomery
P.O. Box 899 , Fort Bragg, CA 95437 

November 4, 2008   11:38 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
M.P. Montgomery
P.O. Box 899
Fort Bragg, CA 95437

510-550-6740
Paul Cardwell
1127 Cedar , Bonham, TX 75418 

November 4, 2008   11:38 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Paul Cardwell
1127 Cedar
Bonham, TX 75418

510-550-6740
Jill Brotman
2075 Coventry Rd , Cleveland Hts, OH 44118 

November 4, 2008   11:38 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jill Brotman
2075 Coventry Rd
Cleveland Hts, OH 44118

510-550-6740
Mark Redmond
"1605 East Olive St., #206" , Seattle, WA 981222789 

November 4, 2008   11:38 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mark Redmond
"1605 East Olive St., #206"
Seattle, WA 98122-2789

510-550-6740
Robert Trimble
600 W. Colorado Ave. Unit J2 P.O. Box 2232, Telluride, CO 814352232 

November 4, 2008   11:38 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robert Trimble
600 W. Colorado Ave. Unit J2
P.O. Box 2232
Telluride, CO 81435-2232

510-550-6740
Patty Libengood
4038 Ridge Parkway , Erie, PA 16510 

November 4, 2008   11:38 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Patty Libengood
4038 Ridge Parkway
Erie, PA 16510

510-550-6740
Kimberley Buckley
2500 West Mall Place , Anaheim, CA 92804 

November 4, 2008   11:37 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kimberley Buckley
2500 West Mall Place
Anaheim, CA 92804

510-550-6740
Rev. Gordon Hills
3556 Wallace Drive , Pittsburgh, PA 152274446 

November 4, 2008   11:37 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rev. Gordon Hills
3556 Wallace Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15227-4446

510-550-6740
Donna Greenwell
46 Waterbury St. , Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 

November 4, 2008   11:37 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Donna Greenwell
46 Waterbury St.
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866

510-550-6740
Patrick Dell'Italia
42 Nostrand Ave. , Selden, NY 11784 

November 4, 2008   11:37 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Patrick Dell'Italia
42 Nostrand Ave.
Selden, NY 11784

510-550-6740
Herbert Boss
235 Andover Dr. , Claremont, CA 91711 

November 4, 2008   11:37 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Herbert Boss
235 Andover Dr.
Claremont, CA 91711

510-550-6740
Catherine M. Holtkamp
1000 St. Anne Drive , Melbourne, KY 410599601 

November 4, 2008   11:37 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Catherine M. Holtkamp
1000 St. Anne Drive
Melbourne, KY 41059-9601

510-550-6740
Margery Race
6008 Club Terrace , Austin, TX 787413302 

November 4, 2008   11:36 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Margery Race
6008 Club Terrace
Austin, TX 78741-3302

510-550-6740
Joshua Heffron
8 East 83 St, Apt 7B , NYC, NY 10028 

November 4, 2008   11:36 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joshua Heffron
8 East 83 St, Apt 7B
NYC, NY 10028

510-550-6740
Diana A. Stokes
1700 E 56th St Apt 3001 , Chicago, IL 60637 

November 4, 2008   11:36 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Diana A. Stokes
1700 E 56th St Apt 3001
Chicago, IL 60637

510-550-6740
Lois Buenau
327 Marietta Road , Mooresville, NC 28117 

November 4, 2008   11:36 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lois Buenau
327 Marietta Road
Mooresville, NC 28117

510-550-6740
Gary Vedvik
40 Reitz Parkway , Pittsford, NY 145342206 

November 4, 2008   11:36 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gary Vedvik
40 Reitz Parkway
Pittsford, NY 14534-2206

510-550-6740
Richard Booth
26250 Dreschfield , Grosse lle, MI 48138 

November 4, 2008   11:36 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Richard Booth
26250 Dreschfield
Grosse lle, MI 48138

510-550-6740
Janis Shaw
862 Maple Avenue , Beaumont, CA 92223 

November 4, 2008   11:36 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Janis Shaw
862 Maple Avenue
Beaumont, CA 92223

510-550-6740
Carolyn Fletcher
150 Mt. Olympus Drive NW , Issaquah, WA 98027 

November 4, 2008   11:35 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carolyn Fletcher
150 Mt. Olympus Drive NW
Issaquah, WA 98027

510-550-6740
Angela Elniski
109 Sunset Ct Apt 8 , Hamburg, NY 14075 

November 4, 2008   11:35 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Angela Elniski
109 Sunset Ct Apt 8
Hamburg, NY 14075

510-550-6740
Paul Doane
825 NE 40th Cir. , Camas, WA 98607 

November 4, 2008   11:35 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Paul Doane
825 NE 40th Cir.
Camas, WA 98607

510-550-6740
Maryalice Webb
63 Felch Road , Natick, MA 01760 

November 4, 2008   11:35 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Maryalice Webb
63 Felch Road
Natick, MA 01760

510-550-6740
Jennifer Valentine
313 1st  Ave , Massapequa Park, NY 11762 

November 4, 2008   11:35 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Valentine
313 1st  Ave
Massapequa Park, NY 11762

510-550-6740
Deanna Keser
4430 E. Waldron Rd. , Rimrock, AZ 86335 

November 4, 2008   11:35 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Deanna Keser
4430 E. Waldron Rd.
Rimrock, AZ 86335

510-550-6740
Tracie Peyton
4476 Harbor Circle , Hoffman Estates, IL 60192 

November 4, 2008   11:35 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tracie Peyton
4476 Harbor Circle
Hoffman Estates, IL 60192

510-550-6740
Laura Redwine
7547 Jerez Ct. , Carlsbad, CA 92009 

November 4, 2008   11:34 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Laura Redwine
7547 Jerez Ct.
Carlsbad, CA 92009

510-550-6740
Amanda Butler
PO Box 58764 , Salt Lake City, UT 84158 

November 4, 2008   11:34 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Amanda Butler
PO Box 58764
Salt Lake City, UT 84158

510-550-6740
Eli Blavin
4140 Duquesne Ave , Culver City, CA 90232 

November 4, 2008   11:34 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Eli Blavin
4140 Duquesne Ave
Culver City, CA 90232

510-550-6740
Ginny Abernathy
623 Paces Ferry Dr , Nashville, TN 37214 

November 4, 2008   11:34 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ginny Abernathy
623 Paces Ferry Dr
Nashville, TN 37214

510-550-6740
wayne Andrews
"472 S. Gilbert St., Apt H" , Castle Rock, CO 80104 

November 4, 2008   11:34 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
wayne Andrews
"472 S. Gilbert St., Apt H"
Castle Rock, CO 80104

510-550-6740
Anna Reycraft
12000 North Bayshore Drive Unit 109, North Miami, FL 33181 

November 4, 2008   11:34 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Anna Reycraft
12000 North Bayshore Drive
Unit 109
North Miami, FL 33181

510-550-6740
Shelley Potts
1601 Elegance Drive , Raleigh, NC 27614 

November 4, 2008   11:34 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Shelley Potts
1601 Elegance Drive
Raleigh, NC 27614

510-550-6740
Fred & Sara Krauthamer
501 S. Ladera St. , Monterey Park, CA 91754 

November 4, 2008   11:34 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Fred %pa_first_name% Sara Krauthamer
501 S. Ladera St.
Monterey Park, CA 91754

510-550-6740
henry halama
18 marko grove , woodstock, NY 12498 

November 4, 2008   11:34 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
henry halama
18 marko grove
woodstock, NY 12498

510-550-6740
Geoff Bommelaere
13 allston st , allston, MA 02134 

November 4, 2008   11:34 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Geoff Bommelaere
13 allston st
allston, MA 02134

510-550-6740
Christine Razmus
2315 E. Olive Street 1A, Arlington Heights, IL 60004 

November 4, 2008   11:32 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Christine Razmus
2315 E. Olive Street
1A
Arlington Heights, IL 60004

510-550-6740
Ethel Durka
30 Newman St , W Keansburg, NJ 07734 

November 4, 2008   11:32 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ethel Durka
30 Newman St
W Keansburg, NJ 07734

510-550-6740
S Nam
165 Bennett Avenue 4L, New York, NY 10040 

November 4, 2008   11:32 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
S Nam
165 Bennett Avenue
4L
New York, NY 10040

510-550-6740
Elizabeth Johnson
1310 NE 60th Ave , Portland, OR 97213 

November 4, 2008   11:32 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Johnson
1310 NE 60th Ave
Portland, OR 97213

510-550-6740
Lynette Smith
378 84th Avenue , Zeeland, MI 49464 

November 4, 2008   11:32 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lynette Smith
378 84th Avenue
Zeeland, MI 49464

510-550-6740
Irene Gulker
3621 Sandpoint Road , Fort Wayne, IN 46809 

November 4, 2008   11:31 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Irene Gulker
3621 Sandpoint Road
Fort Wayne, IN 46809

510-550-6740
suzanne ristagno
1095 mission st. , san francisco, CA 94103 

November 4, 2008   11:31 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
suzanne ristagno
1095 mission st.
san francisco, CA 94103

510-550-6740
lee ballen
2096 redwood drive , santa cruz, CA 95060 

November 4, 2008   11:31 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
lee ballen
2096 redwood drive
santa cruz, CA 95060

510-550-6740
Andrew Falik
2510 Talon Court, #101 , Naples, FL 34105 

November 4, 2008   11:31 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Andrew Falik
2510 Talon Court, #101
Naples, FL 34105

510-550-6740
Claire Phillips
4249 Alcott St , Denver, CO 80211 

November 4, 2008   11:31 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Claire Phillips
4249 Alcott St
Denver, CO 80211

510-550-6740
steven cohn
567 w. Lake , Chicago, IL 60661 

November 4, 2008   11:30 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

The Safe Drinking Water Act requires that a protective drinking water standard be set for perchlorate, thus I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination on this matter. 

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
steven cohn
567 w. Lake
Chicago, IL 60661

510-550-6740
Deborah Walsh
927 windsor.St. , Santa Cruz, CA 95602 

November 4, 2008   11:30 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Deborah Walsh
927 windsor.St.
Santa Cruz, CA 95602

510-550-6740
Judy Lazzara
719 Westchester Ln. , Bolingbrook, IL 60440 

November 4, 2008   11:30 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Judy Lazzara
719 Westchester Ln.
Bolingbrook, IL 60440

510-550-6740
Jennifer Schmidt
10275 CR 27 SW , Farwell, MN 56327 

November 4, 2008   11:30 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Schmidt
10275 CR 27 SW
Farwell, MN 56327

510-550-6740
Eleanor Short
3950 Lyman Road , Oakland, CA 94602 

November 4, 2008   11:29 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Eleanor Short
3950 Lyman Road
Oakland, CA 94602

510-550-6740
Mark Chudzik
22960 Mastick Rd Apt 203, Fairview Park, OH 44126 

November 4, 2008   11:29 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mark Chudzik
22960 Mastick Rd
Apt 203
Fairview Park, OH 44126

510-550-6740
Douglas Harkins
10208 Scarborough Rd , Bloomington, MN 55437 

November 4, 2008   11:29 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Douglas Harkins
10208 Scarborough Rd
Bloomington, MN 55437

510-550-6740
Pat Frey
30424 Marina Road , Dagsboro, DE 19939 

November 4, 2008   11:29 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Pat Frey
30424 Marina Road
Dagsboro, DE 19939

510-550-6740
Christopher Kornmann
2232 Gunther Avenue , Bronx, NY 10469 

November 4, 2008   11:29 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Christopher Kornmann
2232 Gunther Avenue
Bronx, NY 10469

510-550-6740
Archie Loss
4020 Emmet Drive , Erie, PA 16511 

November 4, 2008   11:29 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Archie Loss
4020 Emmet Drive
Erie, PA 16511

510-550-6740
Lynne Gordon-Watson
"427 E. 83 St., #1B" , New York, NY 10028 

November 4, 2008   11:29 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lynne Gordon-Watson
"427 E. 83 St., #1B"
New York, NY 10028

510-550-6740
Theodore VonBartheld
10121 Owls Hollow Rd. , Gadsden, AL 359016731 

November 4, 2008   11:29 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Theodore VonBartheld
10121 Owls Hollow Rd.
Gadsden, AL 35901-6731

510-550-6740
Sheryl Kapelos
2007 Hewitt Drive , Houston, TX 77018 

November 4, 2008   11:29 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sheryl Kapelos
2007 Hewitt Drive
Houston, TX 77018

510-550-6740
Babette Brown
27  CHURCH ST , BEACON, NY 12508 

November 4, 2008   11:29 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Babette Brown
27  CHURCH ST
BEACON, NY 12508

510-550-6740
Greg Margolis
6027 NE Cleveland , Portland, OR 97211 

November 4, 2008   11:29 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Greg Margolis
6027 NE Cleveland
Portland, OR 97211

510-550-6740
Cathy Blair
7 Clayton Terrace , St. Louis, MO 63131 

November 4, 2008   11:29 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Cathy Blair
7 Clayton Terrace
St. Louis, MO 63131

510-550-6740
frederic mcfadden
2004 San Nicholas St , ventura, CA 930013561 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
frederic mcfadden
2004 San Nicholas St
ventura, CA 93001-3561

510-550-6740
Michele Palatas
8307 Duben Avenue , Anchorage, AK 99504 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michele Palatas
8307 Duben Avenue
Anchorage, AK 99504

510-550-6740
John Nicol
2339 North Terry Street , Portland, OR 97217 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
John Nicol
2339 North Terry Street
Portland, OR 97217

510-550-6740
Rhonda Ordway
8325 SW Mohawk St #222 , Tualatin, OR 97062 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rhonda Ordway
8325 SW Mohawk St #222
Tualatin, OR 97062

510-550-6740
Craig Smith
4130 SW 117th Ave PMB274 , Beaverton, OR 97005 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Craig Smith
4130 SW 117th Ave PMB274
Beaverton, OR 97005

510-550-6740
yara elborolosy
25 12 steinway st , astoria, NY 11103 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
yara elborolosy
25 12 steinway st
astoria, NY 11103

510-550-6740
angela kehoe
132 gatwick ct , riverdale, GA 30274 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
angela kehoe
132 gatwick ct
riverdale, GA 30274

510-550-6740
Craig Gatter
163 Shawmut Ave , north haven, CT 06473 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Craig Gatter
163 Shawmut Ave
north haven, CT 06473

510-550-6740
jerry wayne
4044 Coolidge Ave , Los Angeles, CA 90066 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
jerry wayne
4044 Coolidge Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90066

510-550-6740
Marlowe Mager
53 Sleepy Hollow Loop , Clyde, NC 28721 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Marlowe Mager
53 Sleepy Hollow Loop
Clyde, NC 28721

510-550-6740
donna panza
22 bosque loop , santa fe, NM 87508 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
donna panza
22 bosque loop
santa fe, NM 87508

510-550-6740
Valerie Jordan
524 Myra Way , San Francisco, CA 94127 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Valerie Jordan
524 Myra Way
San Francisco, CA 94127

510-550-6740
Jane Goddard
PO Box 1392 , Dewey, AZ 86327 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jane Goddard
PO Box 1392
Dewey, AZ 86327

510-550-6740
C.  Victor Gabriel
"1101 W. Fir Street, #19" , Portales, NM 88130 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
C.  Victor Gabriel
"1101 W. Fir Street, #19"
Portales, NM 88130

510-550-6740
Cynthia Raha
5 Tudor City Place , New York, NY 10017 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Cynthia Raha
5 Tudor City Place
New York, NY 10017

510-550-6740
Craig Forsythe
4219 Kolze , Schiller Park, IL 60176 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Craig Forsythe
4219 Kolze
Schiller Park, IL 60176

510-550-6740
joyce banzhaf
10041 greenwood , grass valley, CA 95945 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
joyce banzhaf
10041 greenwood
grass valley, CA 95945

510-550-6740
Theresa Piazza
878 Bryan Street , Elmhurst, IL 60126 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Theresa Piazza
878 Bryan Street
Elmhurst, IL 60126

510-550-6740
Casandra Young
505 W. Highland Rd , Howell, MI 48843 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Casandra Young
505 W. Highland Rd
Howell, MI 48843

510-550-6740
Willaim Wallin
5337 Zara Ave , Richmond, CA 94805 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Willaim Wallin
5337 Zara Ave
Richmond, CA 94805

510-550-6740
Judy Rose
P.O. Box 7398 , Santa Monica, CA 90406 

November 4, 2008   11:27 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

By defination, it is your responsibility to avoid and eliminate contamination by anything.

I look forward to your reply and your plans to resolve this unacceptable preventable risk.  Thank you.

Sincerely,
Judy Rose
P.O. Box 7398
Santa Monica, CA 90406

510-550-6740
Tanya Paul
1084 Clinton Road , Sacramento, CA 95825 

November 4, 2008   11:25 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to STRONGLY URGE you that you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. THESE FLAWS MUST BE REMEDIED for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination. I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO PROTECT OURSELVES AND OUR CHILDREN.

Thank you for your time and careful consideration of this important matter.

Sincerely,
Tanya Paul
1084 Clinton Road
Sacramento, CA 95825

510-550-6740
sheri bresson
14A Walnut Hill Road , Bethel, CT 06801 

November 4, 2008   11:25 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
sheri bresson
14A Walnut Hill Road
Bethel, CT 06801

510-550-6740
Sienna Kittelman
10103 E Lazy K Rd , Gold Canyon, AZ 85218 

November 4, 2008   11:25 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sienna Kittelman
10103 E Lazy K Rd
Gold Canyon, AZ 85218

510-550-6740
Scott Kunkler
PO Box 2066 , Scotia, NY 12302 

November 4, 2008   11:25 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Scott Kunkler
PO Box 2066
Scotia, NY 12302

510-550-6740
Mike Donohue
401 Grandview Drive , Richmond, VT 05477 

November 4, 2008   11:25 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mike Donohue
401 Grandview Drive
Richmond, VT 05477

510-550-6740
Claudia Del Balso
13517 SW 114th Ct , Miami, FL 33176 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Claudia Del Balso
13517 SW 114th Ct
Miami, FL 33176

510-550-6740
Jane Charette
20230 N 126th Ave , Sun City West, AZ 85375 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jane Charette
20230 N 126th Ave
Sun City West, AZ 85375

510-550-6740
Carol Ostling
2395 Hillview  St. , Sarasota, FL 34239 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carol Ostling
2395 Hillview  St.
Sarasota, FL 34239

510-550-6740
David Staley
3636 Barbara St , San Pedro, CA 90731 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David Staley
3636 Barbara St
San Pedro, CA 90731

510-550-6740
Eric Newberg
N1759 East Valley Park Rd , Lake Geneva, WI 53714 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Eric Newberg
N1759 East Valley Park Rd
Lake Geneva, WI 53714

510-550-6740
Betty Steehler
1400 Nicolet , Detroit, MI 48207 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Betty Steehler
1400 Nicolet
Detroit, MI 48207

510-550-6740
Karl Stote
3209 Aldrich Avenue South , Minneapolis, MN 55408 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Karl Stote
3209 Aldrich Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55408

510-550-6740
Margaret Adey
48 Willow Run Dr. , Belton, TX 76513 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Margaret Adey
48 Willow Run Dr.
Belton, TX 76513

510-550-6740
Lauren Gottlieb
6278 Adobe Circle Rd , irvine, CA 92617 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lauren Gottlieb
6278 Adobe Circle Rd
irvine, CA 92617

510-550-6740
Jennifer Shortess
14 Sugar Loaf Hill , Clarksburg, NJ 08510 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Shortess
14 Sugar Loaf Hill
Clarksburg, NJ 08510

510-550-6740
Diane Vandiver
530 Princeton Dr , Bolingbrook, IL 60440 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Diane Vandiver
530 Princeton Dr
Bolingbrook, IL 60440

510-550-6740
Carmen Hendershott
"65 Fifth Avenue, LL" , New York, NY 10003 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

Please reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carmen Hendershott
"65 Fifth Avenue, LL"
New York, NY 10003

510-550-6740
Donald Elias
766 Newmans Lane , Martinsville, NJ 08836 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Donald Elias
766 Newmans Lane
Martinsville, NJ 08836

510-550-6740
Edmond Malone
4 Locust Ave. E. , West Harrison, NY 10604 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Edmond Malone
4 Locust Ave. E.
West Harrison, NY 10604

510-550-6740
maria Cutrona
320 Clinton Avenue , brooklyn, NY 11205 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
maria Cutrona
320 Clinton Avenue
brooklyn, NY 11205

510-550-6740
Ania Serafin
2912 Berkeley Circle , Fort Collins, CO 80521 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ania Serafin
2912 Berkeley Circle
Fort Collins, CO 80521

510-550-6740
Ann Siegel
400 Park Avenue , Highland Park, IL 600352629 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ann Siegel
400 Park Avenue
Highland Park, IL 60035-2629

510-550-6740
joseph navarro
173 west 78 street , new york, NY 10024 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
joseph navarro
173 west 78 street
new york, NY 10024

510-550-6740
Mary Firminger
1442 Culbreath Rd , Brooksville, FL 34602 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Firminger
1442 Culbreath Rd
Brooksville, FL 34602

510-550-6740
R. Garry
55 Sugarloaf st B , Sedona, AZ 86351 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
R. Garry
55 Sugarloaf st B
Sedona, AZ 86351

510-550-6740
RANDY MERMEL
6524 BELVIDERE ROAD , ROSCOE, IL 61073 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
RANDY MERMEL
6524 BELVIDERE ROAD
ROSCOE, IL 61073

510-550-6740
Joan Murtagh
7115 Garland Ave. , Takoma Park, MD 20912 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joan Murtagh
7115 Garland Ave.
Takoma Park, MD 20912

510-550-6740
Donald Uphold
437 Madison 2600 , Huntsville, AR 727408355 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Donald Uphold
437 Madison 2600
Huntsville, AR 72740-8355

510-550-6740
Winifred Mclean
2838 Shearwater Cove , Virginia Beach, VA 23508 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Winifred Mclean
2838 Shearwater Cove
Virginia Beach, VA 23508

510-550-6740
Charles Arnold
PO Box1672 , Manchester, NH 03105 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Charles Arnold
PO Box1672
Manchester, NH 03105

510-550-6740
Joann Ramos
64 Fiume ST , Iselin, NJ 08830 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joann Ramos
64 Fiume ST
Iselin, NJ 08830

510-550-6740
Nancy Lynn
1725 Maltman Ave , Los Angeles, CA 90026 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nancy Lynn
1725 Maltman Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90026

510-550-6740
Donna Damarodas
4 Orchid lane , Commack, NY 11725 

November 4, 2008   11:24 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Donna Damarodas
4 Orchid lane
Commack, NY 11725

510-550-6740
T.Ed. & Marie Webb
825 kimry moor , Fayetteville, NY 13066 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

We write to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and instead to set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is already widespread and its toxic effects are too well known for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected there from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population generally exceeds the reference dose set by EPA; Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
T.Ed. %pa_first_name% Marie Webb
825 kimry moor
Fayetteville, NY 13066

510-550-6740
Lorraine Moore
138 Crofton , San Antonio, TX 78210 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lorraine Moore
138 Crofton
San Antonio, TX 78210

510-550-6740
Lisa Harms
995 Potrero Ave. , San Francisco, CA 94103 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lisa Harms
995 Potrero Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94103

510-550-6740
gretchen thunberg
1225 carson ave , kissimmee, FL 34744 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
gretchen thunberg
1225 carson ave
kissimmee, FL 34744

510-550-6740
Meghan Quillen
6 Flandreaux Ave , Glens Falls, NY 12801 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Perchlorate Contamination in our water is dangerous

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   As a pregnant mother, it is important to keep dangerous chemicals out of the water supply.

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Meghan Quillen
6 Flandreaux Ave
Glens Falls, NY 12801

510-550-6740
karen soloman
3657 dorothy lane , waterford, MI 48329 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
karen soloman
3657 dorothy lane
waterford, MI 48329

510-550-6740
Stephen Zerefos
1770 Beechwood St. NE , Warren, OH 44483 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Stephen Zerefos
1770 Beechwood St. NE
Warren, OH 44483

510-550-6740
Kara Grasty
2004 10th St. Unit B , Coralville, IA 52241 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kara Grasty
2004 10th St. Unit B
Coralville, IA 52241

510-550-6740
carol strom
1019 kearns ave , winston-salem, NC 27106 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
carol strom
1019 kearns ave
winston-salem, NC 27106

510-550-6740
Panagiotis Rigopoulos
Agiou Georgiou 77 , Patras,  26225 Greece

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Panagiotis Rigopoulos
Agiou Georgiou 77
Patras 26225

510-550-6740
Melissa LeBlanc
352 Evergreen Dr , moncton, NB E1G 2J2 Canada

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Melissa LeBlanc
352 Evergreen Dr
moncton, NB E1G 2J2

510-550-6740
Charlene Boydston
3951 Donner St , Pahrump, NV 89048 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Charlene Boydston
3951 Donner St
Pahrump, NV 89048

510-550-6740
Jennifer Lee
3616 Las Palmas , Glendale, CA 91208 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Lee
3616 Las Palmas
Glendale, CA 91208

510-550-6740
Tamara Bannister
14803 Sandwedge , Wichita, KS 67235 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tamara Bannister
14803 Sandwedge
Wichita, KS 67235

510-550-6740
Sofia Kyriacos Friberg
500 Tunnel Road , Milford, PA 18337 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sofia Kyriacos Friberg
500 Tunnel Road
Milford, PA 18337

510-550-6740
Sara Winberg
2401 W 6900 S , West Jordan, UT 84084 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sara Winberg
2401 W 6900 S
West Jordan, UT 84084

510-550-6740
Ann Newton
501 N. Arlington St. , Greencastle, IN 46135 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ann Newton
501 N. Arlington St.
Greencastle, IN 46135

510-550-6740
Robert Janusko
43 Upsala Path , West Milford, NJ 07480 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robert Janusko
43 Upsala Path
West Milford, NJ 07480

510-550-6740
Bonnie Gorman
222 Rock Island Rd , Quincy, MA 021693841 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Bonnie Gorman
222 Rock Island Rd
Quincy, MA 02169-3841

510-550-6740
Elizabeth Davis
801 Malaga Ave , Davis, CA 95616 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Davis
801 Malaga Ave
Davis, CA 95616

510-550-6740
Thomas Barrett
1190 W Northern Parkway , Baltimore, MD 21210 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Thomas Barrett
1190 W Northern Parkway
Baltimore, MD 21210

510-550-6740
Terri Knauber
18 Royal Palm dr , Cheektowaga, NY 14225 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Terri Knauber
18 Royal Palm dr
Cheektowaga, NY 14225

510-550-6740
Ramona Gault
12022 Northpark Ave. N. , Seattle, WA 98133 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem.

Why is it important to keep our country's drinking water safe? The answer should be self-evident. The health of our citizens should be your uppermost charge and consideration. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ramona Gault
12022 Northpark Ave. N.
Seattle, WA 98133

510-550-6740
Jerome Decker
6321 So. Eagle Court , Gold Canyon, AZ 85218 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to  ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jerome Decker
6321 So. Eagle Court
Gold Canyon, AZ 85218

510-550-6740
Audrey Burns
87 Kendall Blvd , Oaklyn, NJ 081071511 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Audrey Burns
87 Kendall Blvd
Oaklyn, NJ 08107-1511

510-550-6740
Nancy Bellers
79 N. 4th St. Apt # 15, Easton, PA 18042 

November 4, 2008   11:21 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nancy Bellers
79 N. 4th St.
Apt # 15
Easton, PA 18042

510-550-6740
Debi Shargel
931 Hayes St , San Francisco, CA 94117 

November 4, 2008   11:17 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Debi Shargel
931 Hayes St
San Francisco, CA 94117

510-550-6740
Mary Ferraro
1280 Havana , Aurora, CO 80010 

November 4, 2008   11:17 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Ferraro
1280 Havana
Aurora, CO 80010

510-550-6740
Lewis Gersten
350 West 24th Street , New York, NY 10011 

November 4, 2008   11:17 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lewis Gersten
350 West 24th Street
New York, NY 10011

510-550-6740
Mary Stack
39 Tileston Street , Boston, MA 02113 

November 4, 2008   11:17 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Stack
39 Tileston Street
Boston, MA 02113

510-550-6740
Michael Freeman
4158 Larchview Dr. , cincinnati, OH 45236 

November 4, 2008   11:17 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michael Freeman
4158 Larchview Dr.
cincinnati, OH 45236

510-550-6740
Stephanie Bucalo
Box 968 , Shelter Island, NY 11964 

November 4, 2008   11:17 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Stephanie Bucalo
Box 968
Shelter Island, NY 11964

510-550-6740
Carol Rowe
2244 Graham Road , Bayside, CA 95524 

November 4, 2008   11:17 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carol Rowe
2244 Graham Road
Bayside, CA 95524

510-550-6740
Nicole Cook
726 W. Irving Park Rd #2, Chicago, IL 60613 

November 4, 2008   11:17 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nicole Cook
726 W. Irving Park Rd
#2
Chicago, IL 60613

510-550-6740
Suzanne Gaut
925 harper drive , algonquin, IL 60102 

November 4, 2008   11:17 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Suzanne Gaut
925 harper drive
algonquin, IL 60102

510-550-6740
Gregg Stover
141 East Michigan Ave. Suite 600, Kalamazoo, MI 49007-3943 

November 4, 2008   11:16 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gregg Stover
141 East Michigan Ave.
Suite 600
Kalamazoo, MI 49007-3943

510-550-6740
Cynthia Norris
30 Sunflower Drive , Raynham, MA 02767 

November 4, 2008   11:16 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Cynthia Norris
30 Sunflower Drive
Raynham, MA 02767

510-550-6740
ann houston
sneeden rd , chapel hill, NC 275176354 

November 4, 2008   11:16 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
ann houston
sneeden rd
chapel hill, NC 27517-6354

510-550-6740
jackie mckown
655 colburn , toledo, OH 43609 

November 4, 2008   11:16 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
jackie mckown
655 colburn
toledo, OH 43609

510-550-6740
gary kenyon
2709 indian peaks place , Fort Collins, CO 80526 

November 4, 2008   11:16 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
gary kenyon
2709 indian peaks place
Fort Collins, CO 80526

510-550-6740
Barbara Lange
121 Zachary Rd , Coburn, PA 16832 

November 4, 2008   11:16 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara Lange
121 Zachary Rd
Coburn, PA 16832

510-550-6740
Diana Knowland
43580 20Th Street East , Lancaster, CA 93535 

November 4, 2008   11:16 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Diana Knowland
43580 20Th Street East
Lancaster, CA 93535

510-550-6740
William Bishop
521 Cherokee Mills Dr , Woodstock, GA 301895118 

November 4, 2008   11:16 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
William Bishop
521 Cherokee Mills Dr
Woodstock, GA 30189-5118

510-550-6740
Helena Krolikowski
Rua Thomaz Gonzaga,430-09 Boa Vista, Porto Alegre,  91340480 Brazil

November 4, 2008   11:16 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Helena Krolikowski
Rua Thomaz Gonzaga,430-09
Boa Vista
Porto Alegre 91340480

510-550-6740
Louise Fry
115 Ball Road Apt. 8C, Mountain Lakes, NJ 07046 

November 4, 2008   11:16 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Louise Fry
115 Ball Road
Apt. 8C
Mountain Lakes, NJ 07046

510-550-6740
John Wiles III
9100 Cottonwood Cv , Olive Branch, MS 38654 

November 4, 2008   11:16 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
John Wiles III
9100 Cottonwood Cv
Olive Branch, MS 38654

510-550-6740
mike matrejek
165 north canal #830 , Chicago, IL 60606 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
mike matrejek
165 north canal #830
Chicago, IL 60606

510-550-6740
Madeleine Breen
1228 Clifton Avenue , Akron, OH 44310 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Madeleine Breen
1228 Clifton Avenue
Akron, OH 44310

510-550-6740
Christen Schilling
1415 Idlewood Road , Glendale, CA 91202 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Christen Schilling
1415 Idlewood Road
Glendale, CA 91202

510-550-6740
Eva Steinberg
"348 E. 9th St., Apt. 15" , New York, NY 10003 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Eva Steinberg
"348 E. 9th St., Apt. 15"
New York, NY 10003

510-550-6740
philip barreca
29 west 64th st. , nyc, NY 10023 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws should be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
philip barreca
29 west 64th st.
nyc, NY 10023

510-550-6740
Jun Fetalco
338 Lakemont Court , Bloomingdale, IL 60108 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jun Fetalco
338 Lakemont Court
Bloomingdale, IL 60108

510-550-6740
Howard Petlack
1823 Stonehaven Drive , Boynton Beach, FL 33436 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Howard Petlack
1823 Stonehaven Drive
Boynton Beach, FL 33436

510-550-6740
Julie Ruelle
10507 Stockman Ln , SUGAR LAND, TX 77478 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Julie Ruelle
10507 Stockman Ln
SUGAR LAND, TX 77478

510-550-6740
Martha Hohman
1230 West Market St. , Akron, OH 44313 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Martha Hohman
1230 West Market St.
Akron, OH 44313

510-550-6740
Kelly Dennehy
573 Rhode Island , San Francisco, CA 94107 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kelly Dennehy
573 Rhode Island
San Francisco, CA 94107

510-550-6740
Mary Swann
SWANNM@EXEMPLA.ORG 1835 FRANKLIN ST., DENVER, CO 80218 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Swann
SWANNM@EXEMPLA.ORG
1835 FRANKLIN ST.
DENVER, CO 80218

510-550-6740
Mirek Boruta
6409 Hillegass Ave. , Oakland, CA 94618 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mirek Boruta
6409 Hillegass Ave.
Oakland, CA 94618

510-550-6740
charles arbo
579 wright st lakewood 4-305 , lakewood, CO 80228 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
charles arbo
579 wright st lakewood 4-305
lakewood, CO 80228

510-550-6740
nancy leventhal
p.o. box 522 , pioneertown, CA 92268 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
nancy leventhal
p.o. box 522
pioneertown, CA 92268

510-550-6740
Bill Kuebel
1406 East Ridge Rd , Rochester, NY 14621 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Bill Kuebel
1406 East Ridge Rd
Rochester, NY 14621

510-550-6740
Scott Grinnell
704 10th Ave W , Ashland, WI 54806 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Scott Grinnell
704 10th Ave W
Ashland, WI 54806

510-550-6740
Avery English-Elliott
51 Perry Road , Lambertville, NJ 08530 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Avery English-Elliott
51 Perry Road
Lambertville, NJ 08530

510-550-6740
Melina Schneider
5392 jubilee way , margate, FL 33063 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Melina Schneider
5392 jubilee way
margate, FL 33063

510-550-6740
Mary Schilder
3603 Sleepy Hollow Drive , Santa Rosa, CA 95404 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Schilder
3603 Sleepy Hollow Drive
Santa Rosa, CA 95404

510-550-6740
Heidi Hartman
691 Coppertree Ct , Simi Valley, CA 93065 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Heidi Hartman
691 Coppertree Ct
Simi Valley, CA 93065

510-550-6740
Mark Serour
1924 Langshire Drive, Unit D , Fort Collins, CO 80526 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mark Serour
1924 Langshire Drive, Unit D
Fort Collins, CO 80526

510-550-6740
Martin Greitzer
840 W. Creekbury St. , Meridian, ID 83646 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Martin Greitzer
840 W. Creekbury St.
Meridian, ID 83646

510-550-6740
Kimberly Seger
11373 US Route 422 , Kittanning, PA 16201 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kimberly Seger
11373 US Route 422
Kittanning, PA 16201

510-550-6740
Joe Green
Po Box 235 , Farley, MO 64028 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joe Green
Po Box 235
Farley, MO 64028

510-550-6740
Rachelle VanDerWyst
3022 West Donatello Drive , Phoenix, AZ 85260 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rachelle VanDerWyst
3022 West Donatello Drive
Phoenix, AZ 85260

510-550-6740
Capri Starnes
303 W Avenue B , Copperas Cove, TX 76522 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Capri Starnes
303 W Avenue B
Copperas Cove, TX 76522

510-550-6740
Susan Slattery
1349 E. Downington Ave. , Salt Lake City, UT 84105 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Susan Slattery
1349 E. Downington Ave.
Salt Lake City, UT 84105

510-550-6740
Nicolai Miller
10706 SE 52nd AVE , Milwaukie, OR 97222 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nicolai Miller
10706 SE 52nd AVE
Milwaukie, OR 97222

510-550-6740
Adam Flogel
19419 County Road G , Mineral Point, WI 53565 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Adam Flogel
19419 County Road G
Mineral Point, WI 53565

510-550-6740
Guy Guinn
2606 Griderville Rd. , Cave City, KY 42127 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Guy Guinn
2606 Griderville Rd.
Cave City, KY 42127

510-550-6740
Lucas Lackner
130 East Mountain Drive , montecito, CA 93108 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lucas Lackner
130 East Mountain Drive
montecito, CA 93108

510-550-6740
Anthony Miller
3259 thompson # 2 , Muskegon, MI 49441 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Anthony Miller
3259 thompson # 2
Muskegon, MI 49441

510-550-6740
Kevin Mullins
513 Nadig Ct. , Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kevin Mullins
513 Nadig Ct.
Fort Atkinson, WI 53538

510-550-6740
Wanda Quitiquit
3411 Springe Street PO Box 1153, Nice, CA 95464 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Wanda Quitiquit
3411 Springe Street
PO Box 1153
Nice, CA 95464

510-550-6740
George Mazuzan
5506 Oakmont avenue , Bethesda, MD 20817 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
George Mazuzan
5506 Oakmont avenue
Bethesda, MD 20817

510-550-6740
Virginia Ogburn-Matthews
259 Harvest Moon Dr , Georgetown, SC 29440 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you to reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Virginia Ogburn-Matthews
259 Harvest Moon Dr
Georgetown, SC 29440

510-550-6740
Martha Lankton
1275A Bear Mountain Drive , Boulder, CO 80305 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Martha Lankton
1275A Bear Mountain Drive
Boulder, CO 80305

510-550-6740
J Beverly
803 Shurts Street , Urbana, IL 61801 

November 4, 2008   11:14 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Please protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
J Beverly
803 Shurts Street
Urbana, IL 61801

510-550-6740
Maria Beck
Box 520 P.O. Box 520, Angel Fire, NM 87710 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Perchlorate Limits Wanted!

Dear Administrator Johnson,

We want health-protecting limits set on PERCHLORATE in our drinking water.

We get too much of this poison already through other food sources. The combination of the various sources results in overexposure to this known poisenous substance. (As an aside, why would we even ALLOW ANY traces of poison in our food and water???)

We want swift action--action that sides with the general consumer AND NOT with industry!

We are tired of the EPA & other government offices acting in favor of OR siding with the industry--we do not want more"Erin Brokowitch" situations.

Please lower limits of perchloride in my drinking water!!!

Sincerely,
Maria Beck
Box 520
P.O. Box 520
Angel Fire, NM 87710

510-550-6740
Brendan Relyea
158 Powers Street, 2nd Floor , Brooklyn, NY 11211 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Brendan Relyea
158 Powers Street, 2nd Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11211

510-550-6740
Lori Lorant
3329 189th Pl SE , Bothell, WA 98012 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lori Lorant
3329 189th Pl SE
Bothell, WA 98012

510-550-6740
Stephen Oppenheimer
64 Coburn Rd. , Weston, MA 02493 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Stephen Oppenheimer
64 Coburn Rd.
Weston, MA 02493

510-550-6740
Caroline Luley
153-A Cedar Ave , Cocoa Beach, FL 32931 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Caroline Luley
153-A Cedar Ave
Cocoa Beach, FL 32931

510-550-6740
Lorraine Faford
4613 E 18th St , Vancouver, WA 98661 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lorraine Faford
4613 E 18th St
Vancouver, WA 98661

510-550-6740
Kristie Marohn
2736 Summertree , Carrollton, TX 75006 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kristie Marohn
2736 Summertree
Carrollton, TX 75006

510-550-6740
Johnathan Conley
PO Box 1572 , Provo, UT 94603 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Johnathan Conley
PO Box 1572
Provo, UT 94603

510-550-6740
Linda McCormick
5801 Rio Oso Rd. NE , Rio Rancho, NM 87144 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Linda McCormick
5801 Rio Oso Rd. NE
Rio Rancho, NM 87144

510-550-6740
spike buckley
3333 east bayaud ave. , denver, CO 80209 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
spike buckley
3333 east bayaud ave.
denver, CO 80209

510-550-6740
Richard Pranin
29604 Enrose Ave , Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Richard Pranin
29604 Enrose Ave
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275

510-550-6740
Kathy Bilodeau
31 SR Allred Road , Elon, NC 27244 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kathy Bilodeau
31 SR Allred Road
Elon, NC 27244

510-550-6740
Jeff McGraw
Box 1161 , Fremont, CA 94538 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jeff McGraw
Box 1161
Fremont, CA 94538

510-550-6740
Chris Angelos
716 Elden Dr. , Cary, IL 60013 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Chris Angelos
716 Elden Dr.
Cary, IL 60013

510-550-6740
Elson Boles
1015 Balfour St. , Midland, MI 48640 

November 4, 2008   11:09 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Elson Boles
1015 Balfour St.
Midland, MI 48640

510-550-6740
Richard Rasmussen
12520 manor dr , homer glen, IL 60491 

November 4, 2008   11:07 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Richard Rasmussen
12520 manor dr
homer glen, IL 60491

510-550-6740
Kevin O'Reilly
2355 east lynnwood drive , Longview, WA 98632 

November 4, 2008   11:07 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kevin O'Reilly
2355 east lynnwood drive
Longview, WA 98632

510-550-6740
Jenny Neat
Po Box 8 , Chaptico, MD 20621 

November 4, 2008   11:07 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jenny Neat
Po Box 8
Chaptico, MD 20621

510-550-6740
Dru Bishop
803 N. Eucalyptus Ave #5 , Inglewood, CA 90302 

November 4, 2008   11:07 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dru Bishop
803 N. Eucalyptus Ave #5
Inglewood, CA 90302

510-550-6740
Victor Carmichael
5005 Palmetto Avenue, #55 , Pacifica, CA 94044 

November 4, 2008   11:07 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Victor Carmichael
5005 Palmetto Avenue, #55
Pacifica, CA 94044

510-550-6740
Michelle Enderlin
600 Old River Rd , Stella, NC 28582 

November 4, 2008   11:07 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michelle Enderlin
600 Old River Rd
Stella, NC 28582

510-550-6740
Steve Herman
711 E. Ocotillo Rd. Apt. 1, Phoenix, AZ 85014 

November 4, 2008   11:07 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Steve Herman
711 E. Ocotillo Rd.
Apt. 1
Phoenix, AZ 85014

510-550-6740
Kathi omig
4925 N. Lawn Ave , Kansas City, MO 64119 

November 4, 2008   11:07 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kathi omig
4925 N. Lawn Ave
Kansas City, MO 64119

510-550-6740
Diane Good
7185 Cleveland , Bellaire, MI 49615 

November 4, 2008   11:07 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Diane Good
7185 Cleveland
Bellaire, MI 49615

510-550-6740
Ronald LeMahieu
102 Sequoia Ct. #2 , Princeton, NJ 08540 

November 4, 2008   11:07 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ronald LeMahieu
102 Sequoia Ct. #2
Princeton, NJ 08540

510-550-6740
Sharon Grace
175 Gretchen Way , Friday Harbor, WA 98250 

November 4, 2008   11:07 AM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sharon Grace
175 Gretchen Way
Friday Harbor, WA 98250