(1) Occupatio& Cancer Since the observation in 1775 that the incidence of scrotal cancer was unusually high in chimney sweeps, our knowledge of environmental cancer in man has been chiefly based on studies of occupational groups with unusually high cancer rates, response, and relation of types of cancer to environmental agents has been based on detailed studies of occupational cancer, on the environmental aspects of lung cancer have been obtained in the general population with investigation of such factors as cigarette smoking and air pollution as causal agents. A partial list of occupations as they pertain to cancer of the lung fallows: Our knowledge of such factors as latent period, dose More recently, similar data Radioactive or mining and smelting Coke oven operators Gas works operators Chromium ore refining Nickel ore refining Asbestos mining and use Welders, Steam fitters, Short order cooks, Crane operators, Foundry workers At present, occupational cancer offers two additional unique opportunities for research. (I) The growth in number, efficiency, and reliability of hospital cancer registries, state tumor registries, as well as a most laudable spirit of willingness and cooperation on the part of industry (private corporations as well as nationwide trade associations ) makes it now appear feasible to determine the actual contribution of occupa- tional cancer to the total cancer spectrum in the United States. The increment represented by occupationally determined or occupationally caused cancers may be as little as 2 to 5% or as much as 35 to 5G$* we are awe of this and since correction of occupational cancer environments has thus far been the most effective means of cancer control, a long-term study to determine its actual significance seems timely and important, Further, the study will inevitably contribute to our more accurately assessing the role of non-occupational environmental factors and cancer. (2) The second opportunity provided by studies in occupational cancer is that persons at higher risk to cancer of any site because of occupational experience make up prime population groups for fundamental studies on the pro-neoplastic and pre-neoplastic states, The farmer term describes individuals at higher risk to cancer because of the specific environment in which they mrk; the latter describes individuals who in addition to being in a high risk environment have certain pathological or other biological stigmata irdicating the earliest stages of tissue reactions including benign lesions which may progress to overt cancer. Such patients can be studied using such recent, inportant, and relevant techniques of cytogenetics (chromosomal studies for the presence of abnormalities which may herald an oncoming cancer), biochemistry in which metabolic abnormalities in target organ sites may be identified by enzymes and other protein studies, and histopathological, histochemical and electron microscopic studies of cells from organ or organ systems at high risk. We do not 'know. Because 2 (2) Double Primary An exciting and potentially very useful tool in studying the causes of cancer is the growing recognition and supporting evidence that a person with a previously diagnosed, successfully treated cancer is at greater risk to a second, independent primary cancer than appropriate controls, Recently, the successful treatment of cancer has permitted patients to survive long enough to develop a second cancer, of a second tumor is of critical importance as it may well indicate a systemic factgr in susceptfbility to cancer induction. Though thls has long-beck suspected, this appears to be the first time we have the avail- ability of model systems to study this important problem, For example, a patient with oral cancer who has been treated and cured is perhaps at fifty times the risk to esophageal cancer compared to appropriately selected controls. Similarly, iFcreased ____ risk to visceral cancer (cancer of internal organs) has been observed in patients with cancer in sE6 =-€he skin. Associations of this kind permit the use of these gtients for fundamental biochemical, physiolugical, and pharmacological studies of the pro-malignant or pre-malignant state a8 noted above under occupational cancer. (3) This development I _._-- Metabulic Approach to Epidemiolugic Observations on Selected Populations Just as it has been long known that during an epidemic of an infectious disease not all of the exposed population succumbs, so in high risk cancer environments not all of the exposed develop cancer, For infectious diseases, an Fmmunologic basis for patterns of residence and susceptibility appear to aca unt for the epidemiologic observations, neoplastic disease, a possible explanation may reside in the capability of the host to met-uze, detmify and excrete environmental carcinogens, Specifically, one my ask,'%?hy by far do mast of those two-pack-a-day, twenty- year cigarette smokers not develop lung cancer?" complex and certainly involves such factors as intensity and duration of exposure (dose), age at onset of exposure, and frequency of intervals of exposure as well as host factors which appear to be operative in establishing "susceptibility" and "resistance." Pertinent and relative to this is the observation that populations migrating from country to country as well as from rural to urban areas significantly alter their risk to cancer of virtually all sites, and mortality rates of the country to which they have immigrated, others, they retain the pattern of the country from wbich they emigrated, This can be manifested by eitkr an increase or decrease in risk to cancer of a certain, specific site. In -- __ The explanation is most For cancers of some sites, they adopt the risk pattern For I believe we are ready to investigate the possible metabolic bases for these differences in susceptibility and alterations in risk, Environmental carcinogens do not differ essentially from other environmental, toxic agents in that they too have to undergo metabolic change in the body either for the 3 theoretical. possibility of &ificiSl;lly buffering or protecting tihe various organs against enzyme-neutralizing or enzyme-destroying environmental sub- stances, or conversely, artificially stimifiating enzyme systems so that they I 7,J t, L.- [*c LF' Chemical carcinogens m introduced into the general environment ,;/ut i ~ 7' as constitutents of coaplex mixtureso ' <. %";,&. &).nltaneouslyr In cigarette smoke, aubexhaust, industrial effluents, and polluted urban air, for example, in addition to the carcinogens, numerous structurally-related non-carcinogenic compounds are wudly enitted into the environment as part of tbe pollutant mixtureD These combinations of related compounds (Isomers - same chemical composition but structurally different; and Analogues - similm but not identical in chemical composition and structure) reaet with one another as well as with the host systen they are attacking, It has been shown that carcinogenic potency of these environmental. agents is Several carcinogenic agents are present Jl